This really is a must see video. Please spread it around
Category Archives: Sharia Law
Who’s your daddy?
From the Telegraph U.K.
Muslims ‘mass producing’ babies to take over Africa, says Nigerian Anglican leader
The new leader of the Anglican church in Nigeria believes that Muslims are “mass producing” babies to take over Africa.
By John Bingham
Published: 9:42AM BST 21 Sep 2009
The Most Revd Nicholas Okoh, who believes that Christianity is under attack from Islam, was elected primate of Nigeria earlier this month, making him one of the powerful figures in Anglicanism.
Nigeria, where the Anglican church has 17 million adherents, is split between Christianity and Islam.
The country has been riven with religious strife in recent years, notably in the predominantly Muslim north.
In a sermon in Beckenham, Kent, in July he spoke of African Christians being “surrounded by Islamic domination”.
In extracts quoted by The Times, he said: “They spend a lot of money, even in places where they don’t have congregations, they build mosques, they build hospitals, they build anything.
“They come to Africans and say, ‘Christianity is asking you to marry only one wife. We will give you four’.”
He went on: “That is the type of evangelism they are doing: mass-production, so if you have four wives, four children, sixteen children, very soon you will be a village.”
A former Lieutenant Colonel in the Nigerian army, Archbishop Okoh was in 1979.
As Archbishop of Nigeria’s Bendel Province, he was one of the prime movers in the Gafcon meeting of conservative Anglicans in Jerusalem last year.
Melanie Phillips gives very important speech.
Pay attention please anyone who thinks what happened in the UK cannot or will not happen ‘here’, it can and it is. Obama’s policies are nearly identical to the U.K. Obama has decided to call Islamic jihad and terrorism ‘man made disasters’ mirroring the British policies described herein. H/T Solstace
‘Behind the Veil’: from Canada’s Globe and Mail- a 6 part series on the women of Afghanistan
Today Canada’s Globe and Mail introduced an in depth, six part series featuring the women of Afghanistan. Here is the first installment. Each Saturday for the next five consecutive weeks, vlad will be posting the Globe and Mail’s related mainline features, articles and interviews concluding October 24. For related videos and additional commentary and coverage, please go to the Globe and Mail”s ” Behind the Veil–An Intimate Journey Into The Lives Of Kandahar’s Women”.
——–
PART ONE
Jessica Leeder
Kandahar, Afghanistan — From Saturday’s Globe and Mail
Last updated on Saturday, Sep. 19, 2009 02:32PM ED
——–
“My dreams are gone.”
“It is already too late for me.”
“My life has been destroyed.”
At first, the words pouring from the mouth of the girl with jewel eyes hemmed in kohl sound like a typical teenage lament.
Her tone is plain and without melodrama – she believes what she says. And there are plenty of reasons she should.
In the span of about one year, the 15-year-old, named Sitara, has been yanked out of school, off a path that hinted at promise, and sold by her father for 700,000 Afghanis (about $15,000) into a marriage that, already, she has “nothing left for.”
“It seems like men take women as servants, so they can be abusive towards them,” she explained in a hushed on-camera interview conducted secretly in Kandahar while her husband was at work. “It’s not just the husband, there’s also the mother-in-law, sister-in-law and brother-in-law, and they all rule over me; … whenever I do something bad, anyone who gets angry with me beats me.”
Rather than poring over textbooks, Sitara has spent most of her sophomore year willing herself to feel love for the illiterate, middle-aged Kandahari who is now her husband, learning to look after his family’s livestock and reconfiguring her singed plans for the future into a form compatible with her new life as this wife.
“And even now, I don’t want my husband,” she said. “I come from a very open-minded family, but since I’ve come to this family, I feel that my life has been destroyed.” Continue Reading →
Bruce Bawer: Ottawa Sept. 14th speech and Q&A
After literally days of editing uploading file size changing and developing cool logos for everyone with some new software I bought, I finally have the Q&A session from the night with Bruce Bawer online for all too see.
I think the interaction of the panel, of David Harris, Terry Glavin, Bruce Bawer, and Marc Lebuis is well worth the time to watch. All of these men come from quite diverse backgrounds and interests politically but have one very strong thing in common. The threat Islam poses to secular liberal democracy.
If you have already seen Bruce’s speech in Ottawa from Sept. 14th, go to the second video and watch the Q&A
Eeyore for Vlad
“The Battery is Dead” A fantastic, on point speech by Geert Wilders
From Gates of Vienna verbatim:
by Baron Bodissey
Geert Wilders gave an important speech in the Dutch parliament yesterday. Our Flemish correspondent VH has translated the text of the speech, as well as some introductory material.
VH notes: “It’s interesting to observe that not only did the government fear his speech, but also the fraction leaders of other parties. Geert Wilders obviously dominates the political debate in and outside parliament.”
First, from MARGINAAL weblog IN DE MARGE
Fraction leaders are terrified of Geert Wilders
“What I notice, and what I hear from our reporter in The Hague, and what is part of it, is that all of them are very, very afraid and terrified of Geert Wilders, and are completely mesmerized, and that everyone, all fraction leaders […] are only busy with what Geert Wilders is going to do in the general debate.”
Below is the translated text of Mr. Wilders’ speech.
I must say that editing this text was pure pleasure. It is absolutely magnificent. Geert Wilders has the entire Dutch establishment by their miserable little government-issued gonads, and is beginning to squeeze. Hard.
Just think of the show when January rolls around and the regime puts this man on trial!
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Speech by Geert Wilders on the first day of the General Debate in the Dutch parliament
It is over. This government has run aground, like an old car that got stuck in loose sand. It still squeaks a little, it cracks. Anyone can see that the little creature will never move one meter again. The battery is dead. It’s all over.
Madam Chairman, it would be laughable if it were not for the future of the Netherlands. Then you could make fun of that little club of helpless people who stare out through the misty windscreen, hoping there is someone who can tell them which way to go. They know themselves that if you look closely, it is way past saving. That they only made the wrong decisions and did not take note of the little sign: “swamp to the left”. Then they did turn left. Because their ideological GPS is programmed to only turn “left” ever since the sixties. They cannot do anything else. Wouter [Bos, Vice PM, Finance Minister PvdA, Socialist] behind the wheel, Andre [Rouwvoet, Youth and Family Minister CU, Christian Union] in the baby seat, and to Jan Peter [Balkenende, PM CDA, Christian Democrat] anything is okay as long as his party gets to stay in the front seat. [V1]
They tried to throw some ballast overboard. Mrs. Vogelaar [former Integration Minister PvdA, Socialist] was tied to a tree. Aboutaleb [Moroccan-Dutch mayor of Rotterdam PvdA, Socialist] got out in Rotterdam with all his passports. Van Geel [fraction leader CDA] would have preferred to take the turn to Brabant to become the Queen’s Governor there. Jan Peter [Balkenende] cries out all the time: “I want to go to Brussels!”, and the Al Gore parrot, Miss Cramer [Environment and Housing Minister PvdA, Socialist] trumpets from the back seat: “Not too fast, that is bad for the polar bears!” The only route the PvdA is proposing is to do a few turns around the [Amsterdam] canals.
Prime Minister, please just stop with this. Send that rusty piece of junk to the junkyard. Collect the scrap fee. It makes no sense anymore. There is only one reason why the government [“Cabinet”, coalition government] continues stumbling: that is out of fear of elections.
I do understand that. I get it. For when the Netherlands gets to vote, it will show that the crisis mainly is happening in one specific place… and that is in the government. The Balkenende/Bos people, who are most of all good at throwing billions towards the chalk lines, to the big banks. If the Netherlands is allowed to choose, it will choose against the snatching habits, the big fat bonuses and bungling with side jobs. How dare the government go after ordinary citizens while they simultaneously spend billions on banks and leftist hobbies, and hundreds of millions for the 19,000 asylum seekers that await us next year, about double the number of last year! Continue Reading →
Bruce Bawer in Ottawa, a review
The Freethinking Film Society, a Canadian organization committed to providing the nation’s capital with interesting conservative/libertarian films, played host last evening to the much anticipated appearance of journalist Bruce Bawer, author of Surrender-Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom at the National Library, Archives of Canada to an enthusiastic audience.
The evening opened with a thoughtful introduction of panel members by Fred Litwin of the Free Thinking Film Society, and his blog Gay and Right, and with another to Mr. Bawer from Marc Lebuis creator of Canada’s most influential French language, anti-Islamist blog Point de Bascule. Also in attendance was James Cohen, the Canadian vice-president of the International Free Press Society, a vitally important global group which defends the universal right of free expression and combats those who would threaten it. The speaking panel consisted of four members, all of which brought remarkable qualifications, specific areas of expertise and varying political partisanship– award winning journalist and author Terry Glavin; David B. Harris, former chief of strategic planning for CSIS and currently a Senior Fellow for terrorism/national security at the Canadian Coalition for Democracies; renowned author Bruce Bawer and Marc Lepuis. It was easily recognizable from the start that despite the differences in their political views, the most potent of similarities between each of these men was a shared and cogent understanding of the very real and direct threat radical Islam presents to universal human values, and to the principle of individual freedoms.
I choose the words universal and human deliberately and carefully, as these terms reflected the basic undertone of the lecture. Each member thoughtfully reinforced the need to concentrate on the human face of this struggle, to reevaluate the usefulness of the popular concepts of left and right political partisanship we have so securely wrapped ourselves in and, to instead, abandon their usage and unite against those engaged in the furious pursuit to coerce and shift the world toward ‘Dar-al-Islam’. It is also important to understand that countless Muslims the world over do not subscribe to the prescription of submission handed them by the fascist elements that live among them. Many suffer greatly with some, bravely seeking freedom from persecution and enslavement by this hateful and intolerant ideology. It is within this recognition the panel made clear, that we share the most common of ground, where all of us can stand united in direct and strong opposition to extremism.
Mr. Bawer illustrated effectively that we are living in the midst of a jihad most of us do not recognize. We have come to believe that the world suffers only from violent jihad; terrorist plots to murder fueled by an intense hatred of western values by seventh century crackpots in suicide gear, self-imploding at the behest of foaming and slathering Imams in far away lands. While it is true that terror attacks happen with great frequency, a simultaneous but less spectacular attack is in motion. Far more dangerous than a street lined with bloodied body parts is the quiet jihad, the stealth jihad of the ‘polite’, bridge-building kind which is being played out in quiet neighborhoods, institutions and courtrooms across the western world. This type is patient, cunning and deceitful, culturally informed, well financed and legally savvy. Foolishly so, we are complicit in it’s advancement by both complacency and capitulation through our romantic attachment to such things as cultural-relativism, diversity projects, and multicultural policies. We have become dangerously vulnerable and as Mr. Bawer pointed out, they know it.
Islamists simply do not care which political office holds the power of the day as western legal codes are in and of themselves contrary to Islam. Left, right and the principle of democracy are man-made ‘illegal’ notions, a beyond-the-pale bastardization of the laws of Allah. These gross deeds can only be corrected by employing the scripture of the Quran as brought to the world by the prophet Muhammed in the form of sharia, the only law suitable for all of mankind.
Mr. Harris pointed to the increasing infiltration of the Islamist element seen increasingly in a vast array of institutions. Today in Canada as in western Europe, the political fascism of Islam has found a comfortable and protected footing among a variety of departments, banking institutions, political offices and inter-faith groups. His earnest call that we should insist upon the permanent crushing of section 13(1) of the HRC code received wide applause. Terry Glavin highlighted the moral bankruptcy of the feminist movement while in their staunch pursuit to defend the western woman, many routinely abandon the very same human needs asked of by an Afghan mother struggling against her male aggressors. Mr. Lepuis wondered why Imams in some Montreal mosques continue to stridently condemn Canada to a packed house of primarily second and third generation Muslims and why some honour killings are being committed at the hands of men who have been raised and educated in western nations. Each had cited circumstances clearly reflected in Bruce Bawer’s writing and each had reinforced truths found in Surrender.
Asked to review the speaking engagement given by Mr. Bawer and the accompanying guest panel, I entered the room like most other audience members. I left amazed and moved by three things: the unflinching bravery of Mr. Bawer and his devotion to reach out to those of us who seek to understand the growing threat of radical Islam and the operation of stealth jihad; the unity, comradeship and professionalism in common purpose held by the panel members to work in tandem against radical Islam and, the realization that we are not defending western values as much as we are defending human and universal ones.
Thank you to Fred Litwin at The Free Thinking Film Society for bringing Mr. Bawer to Ottawa for such an important event. Thank you to Mr. Harris, Mr. Glavin and Mr. Lepuis for their thoughtful analysis, expertise and professionalism and to James Cohen of the International Free Press Society for his attendance. Most of all, thank you to Mr. Bruce Bawer for his courage in writing such a book of importance and necessity, one which helps us to understand the threat of jihad by way of fundamentalist Islam.
Below, please find a video of Bruce Bawer’s excellent lecture in full. The video of the panel discussion is rumored to be ready and posted within a day or so and should be visible in this post as well, below Dr. Bawer’s lecture.
Grace for VTB:
Help an ex-muslim not get sent to his death by the UK
Father, brother to stand trial in girl’s killing

Aqsa Parvez
The Toronto Star… A Mississauga father and son have been ordered to stand trial next year in a slaying that has attracted international attention.
Justice George Gage today decided there was enough evidence for Muhammad Parvez, now 59, and his son Waqas, now 28, to be tried for the planned and pre-meditated slaying of Aqsa Parvez. They were both committed to trial on a charge of first-degree murder in the strangulation death of Aqsa Parvez.
The 16-year-old student at Applewood Heights Secondary School died on Dec. 10, 2007. Aqsa, known to her friends as “Axa” was the youngest of eight children in the family, which immigrated from Pakistan.
The killing, which some have described as a carefully planned honour killing while others say was a horrible case of uncontrollable domestic violence continues to be the subject of world-wide Internet discussion involving a clash of Western and Middle Eastern cultures.
Evidence presented at the lengthy preliminary hearing and the reasons behind Justice Gage’s decision remain under a court-ordered publication ban.
What is ‘desecration’ of a Koran exactly
Let’s see, we had riots in Greece when rumors circulated about a policeman ‘mistreating’ a koran, so I guess that is desecration, fair enough…
We had several Christians killed, their houses burned, and many families dislocated when Mosques trumpeted that one Christian family had torn a page from a Koran in Pakistan, so I guess that is desecration even when it was utterly untrue and again… well fair enough… sort of….
Then, we had some Muslims smuggling Heroin into Europe in a hollowed out Koran and no riots killings burnings or even condemnations at all so, I suppose, that is not a ‘desecration’. I suppose Mohamed must have been an apothecary…
And today, we have a koran hollowed out and bombs placed inside them in order to kill as many of the unwitting as possible in Iraq.
So, granted this is a small sample, but it gives us a place to start.
Desecration of Koran, therefore, must be when anyone not Muslim handles the holy book of Islam in any manner whatsoever that can be construed as disrespectful, and reported truly or falsely in that manner. Desecration of a koran is a tactic for political gain using the politically correct who think that a book is important merely because a non westerner says it is.
Desecration of a koran is not when that book is destroyed,mutilated or carved out for the purpose of advancing Islam in such ways as smuggling dangerous drugs to harm the infidel and raise money for jihad. It is not desecration when it is filled with explosives to kill other Muslims so long as those Muslims are of some other flavour than the bomber, as technically it’s still jihad to advance Islam.
Glad we cleared that up.
Eeyore
Bill Mahar’s fifth anual ‘burkha beauty babes’!
Anjem Choudery makes his imitation Bin Laden film
Im sure lots of you have already seen this British born again Muslim moron’s “We will fly the flag of Islam over 10 Downing Street” video but I do suggest watching it again below. I think I brought it much closer to the real person. I do think it’s sort of cute how he imitates the classic ‘Bin-Laden-big-beard-in-front-of-the-jihad-flag’ sort of thing. Look familiar?
Govt. of England lies to it’s own electorate to conceal important facts.
Thanks to Niccolo for pointing out this important aticle. The fact that the third most common baby boy name in the UK today is Mohamed is probably no surprise to the readers of this blog or to anyone who has read Mark Steyn’s book, America Alone.
What is a surprise and far more disturbing, is the government of the UK, actually concealing information from it’s own people, information which the entire infrastructure and enormous cost of government is supposed to make available.
This has to be in the top five most seditious acts by a Western government since 911, and a seditious act not by a people against its government but a government against its own people. I am shocked and stunned by this. Frankly, the people of the united kingdom would be absolutely justified in full armed revolt against their government for this. One cannot possibly make a good decision for oneself, one’s family, or one’s community and certainly country if one is not in possession of the best information available. A government could be thought of as criminal if it merely neglected to collect or properly disseminate critical information but to knowingly deceive your own people because they may not like what you have done to their nation?
This escalates this entire matter to a new level.
Eeyore
From the Daily Mail:
Mohammed is now the third most popular boy’s name in England. So why this shabby effort to conceal it?
This week, the Office of National Statistics published a list of the most popular boys’ names in Britain: Jack, Oliver, Thomas, Harry, Joshua, Alfie, Charlie, Daniel.
They reflect a cultural tradition as old as the nation’s history, and would provoke approving nods from Jack the Ripper, Oliver Cromwell, Thomas Becket and Harry Hotspur.
There is just one small problem: the list is deceitful. In reality, the third most popular choice for boy children born last year in England and Wales was not Thomas, but Mohammed.
Deceitful: When both spellings of Mohammed are combined it is the third most popular boys’ name in Britain.
The ONS explains blithely that it had no intent to deceive. Its normal practice is to catalogue different spellings separately, as in Mohammed, Muhammed and so on.
But if you add these variants together, as surely seems logical, then Mohammed is right up there, near the top of the list.
Unfortunately, in recent times we have been given plentiful cause for paranoia about attempts by official bodies to conceal from us information about the changing face of Britain which our rulers know that many people will not like.
Immigration figures are routinely distorted. In a rare moment of honesty, a Labour Home Secretary conceded that he had no idea just how many migrants dwell in this country, because of the huge and unquantified pool of illegals.
Many EU nations decline to collate statistics about the religious affiliations of their populations, to avoid rousing sentiment against Muslims.
The ONS’s hit parade of children’s names, as released for publication, seemed designed to mask a simple truth which dismays millions of people, and which politicians and bureaucracies go to great lengths to bury: the Muslim population of Britain is growing extraordinarily fast. Continue Reading →
Democracy and rule of law dead in England? Legal protester arrested, violent Muslims allowed to rampage
According to a Vladtepesblog source in the UK, the EDL, who had a legal right to protest the opening of a giant mosque in London today, was arrested to keep the peace, while over 1000 nearly entirely Muslims who are physically preventing people from joining the protest, are being allowed to continue to do so, unimpeded.
Pics and video from KGS at Tundra and others! thank you all
From our contact:
At this moment Stephen Gash is being told by a senior sergent of the police to call off the demonstration in Harrow. He has been arrested to prevent a breach of the peace…
More than 1000 mainly muslims are gathered infront of the SIOE demonstration and they stop people to attend the demonstration.
If you are on your way to the demo, don’t go, it’s being called off right now. The police can’t handle the muslim counter demonstraters. The senior sergent said that he doesn’t want any of his policemen killed.
Most of the print stories I am reading are spinnning the story to make the British people appear to suffer from advanced rabies. The fact remains, the EDL and SIOE have legal permits to protest the mosque, and it is they who are being arrested and the violent Muslim counter ‘demonstration’ who are being allowed to continue unmolested by the law.
No video as of yet but no doubt there will be hours and hours of it soon. I will post as I get it.

In the video below, listen to the dhimmi news reporter accuse the organizer of the anti Islamic protest of inciting violence because of the likely Muslim reaction to it. This is utterly disgusting. The next step is now clear. TV reporters will accuse women who do not wear a burka of causing their own rape.
Here we see some members of the religion of peace throwing a few stones at people
Check out the flag in this one, I am told it is the ‘Al Queda flag’
It looks a bit like this: 
Afghanistan passes new pro rape law
I took two, recent BBC clips found through Bill Warner’s most excellent bulletin on abuse of women and added an article from today’s Guardian.UK on top. It gets a little busy at times so I will repost the whole Guardian article below the video.
I think we in the coalition fighting in Afghanistan really need to ask some hard questions about why we are there and what our objectives are exactly. Just at the moment, I have a hard time justifying spending one penny or risking on Canadian life on anything other than killing taliban.
Eeyore
Afghanistan has quietly passed a law permitting Shia men to deny their wives food and sustenance if they refuse to obey their husbands’ sexual demands, despite international outrage over an earlier version of the legislation which President Hamid Karzai had promised to review.
The new final draft of the legislation also grants guardianship of children exclusively to their fathers and grandfathers, and requires women to get permission from their husbands to work.
“It also effectively allows a rapist to avoid prosecution by paying ‘blood money’ to a girl who was injured when he raped her,” the US charity Human Rights Watch said.
In early April, Barack Obama and Gordon Brown joined an international chorus of condemnation when the Guardian revealed that the earlier version of the law legalised rape within marriage, according to the UN.
Although Karzai appeared to back down, activists say the revised version of the law still contains repressive measures and contradicts the Afghan constitution and international treaties signed by the country. Continue Reading →



