A little comparison shopping: Food prices on average for Canada Vs. the USA, or, food in free Vs Communist countries

Posted on by — Leave a reply

National average price for a whole chicken in the USA:

Whole bird: $6.00 to $9.00 USD or CDN $10.43

Loblaws advertised price today:

Screenshot

T bone steaks-

US Average price:

Per Pound: $12-18 average
Premium/Organic: $18-25+
Grocery Store Range: $10-22 per pound depending on grade and region

In Canadian that would be around CDN $20.85 per lbs.

At Loblaws, which is maybe the biggest Canadian grocery chain and a reasonable metric for average food price:

Screenshot

That is CDN $25.00 per LBS

National average price in US for potatoes:

Per Pound: $0.75 – $1.25 average
Russet Potatoes: $0.60 – $1.00/lb
Red/Yukon Gold: $1.00 – $1.50/lb
Organic: $1.50 – $2.50/lb

So around say, CDN $1.40 or so.

Loblaws:

Screenshot

I am doing this post because I ran into a business man who has a well known large company that moved it and his other interests from Canada to the USA. In a casual conversation with him, he said that food in the most expensive Nevada grocery store was in fact cheaper than it is in Food basics, one of Canada allegedly least expensive food outlets.

I would say he is right.

The US has 10X the population of Canada. The reason for this imbalance is almost certainly government and the regulations and road blocks it gives farmers, largely in the form of Lines of Action such as “Carbon Tax” which makes farming nearly altogether impossible for Canadian farmers.

We have Mark Carney, the current leader of the state himself saying many years before he was in the position he is in now, explaining that Canadians will eat less meat and life will be harder. By design. Not because of some disaster, or at least not a natural one.

It might also be because Canada has decided to bring in MILLIONS of people who all eat, and few of them appear to do any useful work. Fewer likely farm.

In the 1960s and 1970s, Canada was the lucky recipient of hundreds or thousands of Dutch Farmers who wanted to farm knew how to farm and were willing to bust their humps at menial labour to save money to buy a farm and then work it.

I know some personally. Now we are literally plowing over the best farmland in Canada and some of the best anywhere to build beehives for illegal migrants.

This makes higher food prices an additional hidden tax for the government plan to deracinate legacy Canada.

I asked Hermes, a local AI Agent what its thoughts on this article are. Here is its answer:

This creates an interesting dynamic where the people most affected by Canada’s food pricing policies are those least able to leave, while those with means can simply move to areas with more affordable groceries. It’s essentially a form of economic stratification – those who can afford to vote with their feet do so, while those who can’t are left dealing with the consequences.

This also means the “brain drain” effect might be more pronounced among the wealthy and professional classes, potentially reducing the tax base that could fund solutions to these very problems.

Of course what it doesn’t know, is the problems is the intention of leftist governments.

 

Now reporting on illegal entrants to the west’s crimes are less important than reporting on the enforcement and judicial operations to encourage those crimes, Also Elon Musk and the viral clip: Links 1 for June 25, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. There is a wildly viral clip you have all seen by now with Elon Musk and a leftist propagandist from The Economist, where he schools her on one of the more common dialectical weapons used for the past few decades. That would be the one where the left calls anyone with normal, healthy views, “far Right” often with the term extremists added to it.
Elon tells her off rather well.

We have a few things to add. Firstly, in the very unlikely event that Elon rever  eads this site, he should know that one never ever does an interview with enemy propaganda without filming it yourself separately, either overtly or covertly. I have to say that one of the people who really did understand this was British lawyer com jihadi, Anjem Choudary (also known as Abu Luqman). I really appreciated his videos as he was the first English jihadi leader who actually just told the truth about Islam and its intentions and beliefs. Frankly at one point I thought he was an op of some kind as he didnt use the initiate language of islam or any of the forms of deception classical fiqh recommends for such cases. But I noticed that in all his interviews he did with anyone, he had one or more cameras on tripods running in the room himself. Had Musk done that, he wouldn’t have had to say, “Leave that part in” hoping they would but knowing he had no power. Instead, he could have published it separately afterwards had they edited it out, doing vastly more good of exposing the leftist media than the way he did it.

It always annoyed me that our side just didn’t learn that simple lesson and as a consequence, we became edited into tools of enemy propaganda.

I havent seen the entire interview yet, but from the few minutes I did see, it was the same as many British and Canadian legacy journalists interviewing prominent non-leftists. In no way was it an interview, where the purpose is to get the subject to explain their views or area of expertise. What it was, from the few minutes I saw, was a series of dialectic attacks using terms that are initiate, to put it mildly, or that automatically direct the belief in the viewer, and usually also the subject the wrong way. Here is the whole interview for context. But in the now famous clip, Elon rightly straightens her out on the critical theory attack phrase of “The far right”.

Skipping around you hear a parade of these kinds of terms, And we here at Vlad Tepes view these terms as one of the enemy’s most potent weapons. IF we had the time and money, making a small dictionary to remind people of what the words used to mean, or how they are used today, or what new terms really mean in fact and effect would be a worthwhile project.

A couple of examples while we are on it. NEVER use the word God, for Allah. It immediately disarms the listener and puts them in a position where they logically should defend Islam. But a thing, real or imagined is defined by its attributes. And calling Allah God is the same as calling Superman, Donald Duck. Or Zeuss, Thor. Or Hercules, Jesus. Or Cupid, Moloch. That last one is maybe the best analogy. At least in terms of distance of attributes.

Jordan Peterson faced an identical tactician on British Channel4 in the UK around 8 years ago.

2. In New York yesterday there was an Islamic jihad attack stabbing Jewish people.

Of course, in keeping with modern trends of publishing things in such a way as to avoid informing people, we don’t know if he is a convert, or born to a Muslim family but we are led to believe there is a mental health issue with the man who stabbed two people while yelling Allah Ackbar. At times like this we really need to read people like Dr. Thomas Szasz, The Myth of Mental Illness. But then again, it is always what Western media says after a Muslim wages jihad. Or, they blame it on a target of the left. Like when a Muslim in Montreal murdered many young engineering students at a girl’s school in Montreal, they gave him an Anglo name, Mark Lepine, and claimed the problem was male hatred of women, avoiding any mention of his Algerian Muslim father and a lifetime of propaganda about the rightful role of women.

The second issue is that frankly, like calling Muslim child-sex-slave gangs in the UK, “Asian”, they have taken a belief and made it into an actual racist issue. No Japanese people were or are involved in the UK (and many more locations) forced prostitution of child girls. Or Chinese as far as we know. But LOTS of Muslims who where not Asian were most certainly involved. In this case, they characterize the Mentally ill as people ready to go off and stab people yelling Allah Ackbar. Keep in mind that in Western mental hospitals, those who have identity issues and think they are Jesus, may walk around in sandals and a bedsheet blessing people and forgiving them. Those who think they are Mohammad would try and murder entire tribes of people and write about the rivers of blood on the streets. So the problem isnt so much mental illness, as who they are trying to emulate.

“Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith,

a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today)

and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. 

3. At this point, posting news stories about grotesque crimes and antisocial acts by Muslim and occasionally other illegal entrants to the UK and West in general, is not where the story lies. It actually is in how the judicial and enforcement systems themselves now operate as part of a larger machine to crush the legacy peoples and cultures that created the West as it is, and are the inheritors of Classical civilization, ranging from Israel to Rome and Greece. Bringing in people very likely to commit these acts, paying them to not have to do anything purposeful like learn a trade and actually become part of Western Civilization, and then when some of them inevitably commit atrocities, the publicity around the act will inevitably make them the victim and their victims the perp, framed sometimes in the Marxist Oppressor/Oppressed narrative, but sometimes as they are victims of mental illness in a society that doesn’t care about them and their victims are privileged. Meaning white people or Jews who actually work or have families. That being of course, just a minor variation of the Marxist method.

This story fits the theme very well. But is probably the tenth one I have seen this week, and that is without looking for them.

4. More on the same theme:

5. The public must learn to distrust the MS Media if it hopes to EVER understand the simplest things taking place around them.

Woman stabbed and set on fire inside Stuttgart shopping center

Police arrested a 54-year-old German national following a two-hour manhunt, but questions remain over whether the description refers to a German-born or a naturalized suspect

A 47-year-old woman was left fighting for her life on Thursday after she was repeatedly stabbed and then set on fire inside Stuttgart’s Milaneo shopping center.

Emergency calls began reaching police shortly after the mall opened at around 10:15 a.m. The victim, reportedly an employee at one of the stores, was rushed to the hospital with life-threatening injuries and underwent emergency surgery.

According to Bild, the suspected attacker fled the scene, prompting police to evacuate and seal off the shopping center while armed officers searched the complex. A helicopter was also deployed.

Officers arrested a 54-year-old man at approximately 12:10 p.m. in Stuttgart-Heumaden, several miles from the mall. Prosecutors said the suspect and victim were, or had previously been, in a relationship.

Investigators are reviewing surveillance footage and securing evidence as they attempt to establish the motive. Authorities said there was no continuing danger to the public, and the Milaneo later reopened.

I asked Grok for an update and yeah there is substantive information if you know what you are seeing. But only if you already know enough to know what is likely the case:

According to German police and media reports (including SWR, Stuttgarter Nachrichten, and others):The suspect is a 54-year-old man described as a German national (deutscher Staatsangehöriger).

He is the husband of the 47-year-old victim (or was in a relationship with her; later reports specify he attacked his wife).
The attack happened at her workplace — a food store in the basement of the Milaneo shopping center in Stuttgart — on the morning of 23 July 2026.
He repeatedly stabbed her with a knife and then set her on fire. She suffered life-threatening injuries and required emergency surgery.
He fled, was hunted for about two hours (including with a helicopter), and was arrested after members of the public spotted him on a city tram and alerted police.
A detention order was issued; he is in custody on suspicion of attempted murder.

No further personal details (birthplace, ethnicity, migration background, prior convictions, or mental-health history) have been officially released. German authorities often list naturalized citizens simply as “German nationals,” so it is not yet clear whether he was born in Germany or acquired citizenship later. Police explicitly said they are still operating under the previous disclosure rules.

No name for perp or background offered.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

I found this interview with comedian, Ben Bankas by Louder with Crowder to be quite interesting. Entertaining as well. Which is a nice combination.

This woman runs an interesting channel. She is a Mortician, and has a YouTube channel where she discusses her work and aspects of death. In a very non-offensive way actually. I am not aware if she mentions the white fibrin clots of the mRNA injected, but this one is about Jeffery Epstein and things that puzzled her about his death.

I would only add one thing.

There are only 2 reasons for a political assassination. 1. Obviously to get rid of a problem. But 2. To make sure everyone knows that it was a political assassination as a deterrent to anyone else who may be thinking of becoming a problem to the actor in question. The Clintons seem to have made their kills obvious in the same way. Like one Wikileaks whistleblower, Seth Rich, who was found killed in a DC suburb in Bloomingdale with a Gold Rolex on him, and a wallet full of cash and the official story was it was a robbery/mugging. His family hired a PI who openly stated that this was a political assassination and then the family fired him. Which I didn’t understand. Till I found out they had another son. In that context everything she says makes perfect sense.

Reader’s links for July 25th, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

On the Global Warming active measure

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Thie following video is attempting to repair the damage of a previous dialectical bombing run. Namely the human or “Anthropogenic” Global Warming narrative attack. Although frankly, this particular narrative is ongoing. We are still bombarded with Global Warming narratives in Canadian and other media on a regular basis as the explanation for a great deal of phenomenon, real and imagined. The now annual massive forest fires which choke out cities across North America are real. But the cause is not Global Warming. If it was, there wouldn’t be a single tree anywhere in South America or South Asia or Africa.

So it is still necessary, and worth it to try and explain to people that the anthropogenic ‘global warming’ narrative attack is exactly that. A narrative attack.

And that narratives are false by definition. But much more importantly, it is very necessary to explain what it is and what it is for. And that is a mass-line narrative attack on reality, on individualism perhaps especially. But then so are all narrative attacks. After all, when the problem, especially an existential one is of a global scale, then the solution has to be individual sacrifice for a collective. And what constitutes that collective is always determined by the state. The whimsical fungible state who picks and chooses the targets of attack as well as beneficiaries of them on political expedience. Not reality. Liars you must know, know they are lying. So explaining to them why they are wrong is pointless. This is why they are passing laws to make sure countering those narratives, or defending against dialectical attacks cannot be done without punishment. Especially from any position of real influence. Bill C-9 being the most current example.

There are now rumours floating around that Canadians are experiencing door-knocking by agents of the state based on things they have said prior to the passing of bill C-9. That fact is worthy of its own post and will get one soon. But for the moment, it is just an illustration of the extent the state will go to, to maintain their narratives and punish someone guilty of counter-narrative speech. Which, in a communist society, in a sense is the only real crime. The lengthy list of laws and regulations frequently mentioned in the Gulag Archipelago could be fairly summarized as, “speech or thoughts which are counter to state narratives and authority”

The video below is another excellent scientific bust of the Global Warming narrative. And yeah, it’s useful, sort of, in the exceptionally rare instance that you talk to someone who looks at climate science as science, and not an entrenched political position. Which unfortunately nearly everyone does. Especially perhaps In Canada. An opinion of a matter that can be easily determined by even a cursory check, establishes your political identity and no one changes that merely because all the evidence goes the other way. The wearing of flimsy surgical masks during Covid was just one of many easy examples, even during Covid alone. This has become so bad, that in Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada, Pierre Poilievre’s CPC for all intents and purposes is mere controlled opposition, even if it is just because they believe that telling the truth about Global Warming, islam, immigration, Multiculturalism, Chinese influence, Critical Gender Theory or any other narrative-attack on reality would diminish their chances at electoral victory. And you know, they may be right.

Which essentially means: “We have met the enemy, and it is us”. -Walt Kelly

Below is our interview with Stephen Coughlin where Dr. Sam Dubé and I get a briefing on the nature of dialectical bombing runs, and the problem of trying to repair one attack with the truth while the bomber is now several miles ahead launching another series of attacks. This description is precisely what is happening to us. No sooner can we even start talking about the reality of ‘transexualism’ when suddenly every flag in Canada is at half mast for months on end because of alleged graves at Amer-Indian residential schools for which there is no evidence, and unusually, there is quite a bit of evidence that there are none. Including zero reports from parents of ‘missing children’.

Ottawa’s own Tom Harris also does excellent presentations on Global Warming in terms of the science and reality of climate.

As a related aside, below Tom Harris speaks to the massive forest fires which we never had before and now are darkening the skies and making breathing an awful experience in major Canadian and US cities. This is from 2024. And here we are in 2026 and it is happening again.

Thank you all for checking out this site. I really hope this post makes sense. Understanding that what the state forces on us through dialectical enemy propaganda like the CBC, CTV and Global is only a fraction of the issue. In a way, not the issue at all. It is the telos, The idea that the end effect of this and all narrative attacks is about the utter destruction followed by or concurrent with, the TOTAL destruction of our identity and history of our identity has to be understood in order to fight these narrative attacks.

Knowing what they are, means not being affected by them.

Reader’s links for July 24 2026

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

White ‘Fibrin’ clots in the bodies of the vaxxed now peer reviewed as fact

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Interview we did in 2022 with an embalmer on this issue:

RAIR article with John Campbell and John O’looney on the clots

Unveiling a Terrifying Reality: Embalmer John O’Looney Exposes Alarming Surge in Blood Clot Deaths with Dr. John Campbell Ph.D. (Video)

 

Survey of embalmers from 2023

 

 

Reader’s Links for July 23, 2026

Posted on by — 17 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Islamophobia laws make way for Islamic conquest in the most brutal sense: Links 1 for July 22, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. Video on Islamophobia laws as the leading edge of Islamic conquest of Western nations

I am tempted to make small corrections to an otherwise accurate thesis. I don’t think there ever was a “homosexual movement” so much as a leftist movement, weaponizing the perceived oppressed status of homosexuals. I knew a gay conservative once that made multiple attempts to publish articles about Islamic views of homosexuality to one of those free newspapers you find in cities. This one was well funded enough to have boxes all over town with copies inside for distribution. They declined his submissions every time, and when he pressed for an answer as to why, they explained their real orientation. It had, like the women’s movement, exactly screw-all to do with homosexual rights, but the use of that demographic for leftist purposes. Otherwise this video has a lot of value in terms of the nature of Islamophobia as a weapon of dialectical conquest.

2. These kinds of stories now flood my Twitter feed. But the story is secondary at best. It is the fact that these people were BROUGHT IN to the West TO DO EXACTLY what they are doing, and are paid very well for it. More than  huge fraction of the working and retired or veteran populations of Western countries. Also secondary to the fact that the law gives them special treatment, bending over sideways to find reasons not to jail them. The reasons sometimes hitting heights of absurdity. Many years ago now, Elisabeth Sabbaditch Wolfe was found guilty of a hate crime for asking a question to a class she was teaching about Islam, a private class I should mention, not through a school of any kind, where she asked the following question: “Mohammad ‘married’ Aisha at 6 and consummated their relationship when she was 9. What would we call such a person here today?”

So asking a question where the obvious answer is “pedophile” landed her a guilty verdict. One that she appealed all the way to the European Union Human Rights Court. They found her guilty as well. The logic was, that because Mohammad was still screwing Aisha when she hit age of majority, he therefore was not a pedo, and so calling him one, or asking a question about him where the obvious answer is he is one, remains a crime.

This is what we call, “Pretzel Logic”.

The amazingly badly made film, Citizen Vigilante became the most watched movie in the world at one point because it actually addressed this crucial point. That judges are letting extremely dangerous people back on the street, and failing to convict illegal immigrants for serious crimes using similar logic, resulting in the victimization of increasing numbers of actual Europeans.

So when we list these things, rage bait doesn’t come close to what it should be. And the contempt should be directed at those who worked their way into power, and then proceeded to dismantle everything good that hundreds of millions of citizens, past and present sacrificed to build the greatest, most productive and safest civilization the world has ever known.

“Wir schaffen das”.

3. How petty and vindictive can the Canadian judicial system be when it comes to the United States?

Click through for the comments.

In fairness, it might not be the judicial system. I smell political interference.

4. Only Canada and China ay? Pity.

5. Tunisian migrant jailed for 10 years after raping two Italian teens lured by fake tattoo offer

The 33-year-old threatened one victim with a knife after taking the friends, aged 17 and 18, to an isolated farmhouse outside Milan

A Tunisian man has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping two young women after posing as a tattoo artist and luring them to an isolated farmhouse near Milan.

As reported by Il Giorno, the victims had met at a residential center for troubled girls and formed a close friendship. The younger girl, who was 17, wanted the name of her 18-year-old friend tattooed on her arm as a symbol of their bond.

The pair met the 33-year-old man in Milan last spring after he claimed he could carry out the tattoo. Instead, he took them to a farmhouse, where he assaulted them and held a knife to the throat of one of the victims during the attack.

I guess the media couldn’t call him an “incel” then can they?

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

Explaining a substantial number of deaths attributed to “Covid 19”

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

This video is from July 21, 2026

April 2020

April 2020

Reader’s Links for July 22nd, 2026

Posted on by — 27 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Reader’s links for July 21st, 2026

Posted on by — 18 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Canadian/UK state apparatus and media retasked as communist dialectically operating orgs

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

The various ministries or departments of a republic are clearly intended to operate as per their title, to accumulate information or regulate industry for the benefit of the people within the parameters of their field and authority. The media was to make sure they did their task as designed and hold them accountable when they did not.

The communist revolution across the West has made these institutions into ones that operate, as one would expect, as they do in communist polities like the Soviet Union. Statistics Canada no longer collects important information in order to inform government policy and to let the public know what the facts are to see how they should vote in order to affect said policy, but to promote state narratives no matter how destructive they are. And, like all dialectical organizations, their very purpose is destruction. So the operation of the media and institutions of state is now destructive by design.

Here are two examples from Statistics Canada. One is obfuscating reality in order to have no idea about the truth of crime statistics whatsoever, and the other a promotional video celebrating the consequences of destructive state policy, namely mass immigration by hostile ideologies into Canada.

Both of those videos show that the agency is operating in the opposite manner that it was created for, and how people expect they still operate. It is too difficult a pill for most Canadians to understand this transformation however. Explaining it to them kindly, with patience and with enough evidence for any pre-communist court or actual scientific analysis to conclude this is the case, only makes them come to a slow boil rather than convince them.

Still, one has to try. The more they listen and absorb, the faster their own day-to-day experience will lead them to the truth of their senses. And it will be because of what you showed them, even if they don’t remember it, admit to it, or credit you. But we must do it.

Moving on to Health Canada:

This is a presentation at Parliament Hill on Oct. 25th 2025 by Shawn Buckley, a Constitutional lawyer who started and ran the National Citizens Inquiry which was the only forum for truth, or if truth is an uncomfortable word in the purest sense, the only venue for counter-narrative views and science during the Covid years.

In this presentation they discuss Health Canada’s newer regulations which prevent people from accessing effective health care.

Moving on to police/media complicity to enforce narrative. This has become so common that it feels like a potential insult to the reader to post examples. But it is very important to stay aware of the real nature of the media and state organs if one wishes to preserve ones’ sanity in these times.

Below, the ongoing narrative attack on Private property by the state, using the totem of abuse of Amer-Indian people. For those that don’t know, for months, flags were at half mast and the public was bombarded by state media on alleged graves of Amer-Indian children at residential schools, the evidence for such claims has never been demonstrated, and now there is talk of criminalizing requesting that evidence. This would be “Residential school denialism”. This fits into the Orwellian pattern the rest of this post is pointing to. More on that farther down.

In this clip, someone trotted out to be an Amer-Indian leader explains that they do not want the alleged bodies exhumed and they want them left right where they are, but they can just sense that they are there. This is where reality gives way to scientism, exactly as it did during Covid.

OK this is maybe marginally related. But the fact that she queued in to the destruction of the English Language with Orwell’s essay on Newspeak makes it worth putting here.

I think this was somewhere in the city still called, Toronto, but bearing no resemblance to a Canadian city of a few decades ago, an employee at a GoodLifeFitness gym followed her instructions to evict anyone displaying a weapon. She was promptly fired for it. Of course it was a Sikh. And as one might expect, his behaviour in the gym at least appears to have been deliberately provocative to create this exact scenario such that he has an easy payday ahead of him, and equality before the law gets dissolved a little bit more in the acid of dialectical multiculturalism.

I don’t know who this guy is, or what his deal is or his party is. But overall what he said is exactly right. I would take minor issue with some of his history, but in terms of the nature of these bills he references, yeah. It’s what he said. And yes, there is a configuration of these bills that can end with life in prison for thought crimes.

Today’s excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago. I would ask that all of you, Canadian, American, European if you can still even read this site (I get reports that many cannot) PLEASE read this little excerpt then search for videos on Canadian bills, C9. now law, C22, C8 and C 34 I think it is.

“Article 58 consisted of fourteen sections. In Section 1 we learn that any action (and, according to Article 6 of the Criminal Code, any absence of action) directed toward the weakening of state power was considered to be counterrevolutionary.

Broadly interpreted, this turned out to include the refusal of a prisoner in camp to work when in a state of starvation and exhaustion. Thls was a weakening of state power. And it was punished by execution. (The execution of malingerers during the war.)

From 1934 on, when we were given back the term Mother- land, subsections were inserted on treason to the Motherland- la, 1b, 1c, 1d. According to these subsections, all· actions directed against the military might of the U.S.S.R. were punishable by execution (lb), or by ten years’ imprisonment (la), but the lighter penalty was imposed only when mitigating circumstances were present and upon civilians only.

Broadly interpreted: when our soldiers were sentenced to only ten years for allowing themselves to be taken prisoner (action injurious to Soviet military might), this was humanitarian to the point of being illegal. According to the Stalinist code, they should all have been shot on their return home.

(Here is another example of broad interpretation. I remember well an encounter in the Butyrki in the summer of 1946.

A certain Pole had been born in Lemberg when that city was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Until World War II he lived in his native city, by then located in Poland; then he went to Austria, where he entered the service, and in 1945 he was arrested there by the Russians. Since by this time Austrian Lemberg had become Ukrainian Lvov, he received a tenner under Article 54-1a of the Ukrainian Criminal Code: i.e., for treason to his motherland, the Ukraine! And at his interrogation the poor fellow couldn’t prove that treason to the Ukraine had not been his purpose when he went to Vienna! And that’s how he conned his way into becoming a traitor.)

One important additional broadening of the section on reason was its application “via Article 19 of the Criminal Code”-“via intent.” In other words, no treason had taken place; but the interrogator envisioned an intention to betray and that was enough to justify a full term, the same as for actual treason. True, Article 19 proposes that there be no penalty for intent, but only for preparation, but given a dialectical reading one can understand intention as preparation. And “preparation is punished in the same way [i.e., with the ~_ame penalty] as the crime itself’ (Criminal Code). In general, “we draw no distinction between intention and the crime itself, and this is an instance of the superiority of Soviet legislation to bourgeois legislation.”

This section goes on for some time. But it is clear as day what it is speaking about. The rapid creation of a number of laws that were created specifically to be interpreted as broadly as possible such that the state can get anyone, at anytime, for anything.

And the top legal experts in Canada such as John Carpay and Bruce pardy have been VERY clear that the recent spate of laws passed in Canada, some of them WITHOUT DEBATE are written in exactly that way.

Many interviews are on this site with both experts.

Moving on to Transport Canada:

So this would be an example of the dialectical transformation of both Provincial, (in this case Ontario) and Federal regulatory bodies to make highways unsafe and trucking in particular a threat to transportation. There is simply no way that a school or schools like the ones issuing Potemkin licences to illegal, mostly Sikh migrants could possibly ever operate for 40 minutes without being shut down by police in a functional republic as Canada was not long ago. Think about each and every ticket you have had, showing licences and registration and insurance to police for a busted tail light or speeding a little over the limit. This MUST be by design.

Screenshot

Thank you all for checking out this site.

 

Reader’s Links for July 20th, 2026

Posted on by — 23 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Canada finally finds way to tax the air, UK and Canadian media shape reality in predictable ways, health Canada hides deadly detail about mRNA shots: Links 1 for July 19, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

1. In previous major fires in Canada, something that has become the new normal in the past few years, yet which frankly never happened before that. I mean in decades in Canada I cannot remember the city chocking with smoke from distant forest fires, it has been established that these fires are the result of an interesting combination of new and bad forestry management practices, where underbrush that serves as kindling for fires is no long cut back, and arson. Many people have been arrested and tried for arson in setting these fires. No idea what happened to them after that. But it would be meaningful to know.

Some of them were alleged to be from ANTIFA. Likely the same group burning down over 100 Churches in Canada.

Now the US is threatening to freeze Carney’s massive assets in the USA if he doesn’t do something to stop these fires. Which means the US is confident that Canada has the ability to either stop setting these fires, or put them out quickly. As Canada’s #1 corporate Welfare recipient, Bombardier actually makes water bombers, one might image there are a few of them in hangers somewhere in Canada.

2. The video above also mentions Chinese election interference. The Bureau, Sam Cooper’s Substack is the best place to see that, especially in terms of Chinese influence in Canadian affairs. But also US.

A Communist Party Talent-Recruitment Official Co-Wrote a Book With the Canadian Scientist Now Charged With Copying Thousands of Government Files

OTTAWA — Dennis Lu, the Natural Resources Canada scientist at the center of one of the most consequential foreign-interference prosecutions in the country’s history, co-authored a scholarly book on carbon-capture technology that his publisher released in December 2024 — months after Canada’s national security police had already detained him. The Bureau has confirmed Lu’s co-author was a Chinese professor who is also a Communist Party personnel official: the man who, since 2020, has helped run the recruiting machinery at Southeast University in Nanjing and today directs its Talent Work Office.

The two scientists earned degrees at that same university, decades apart — Lu a master’s in thermal energy and power engineering in 1985, his co-author a doctorate in 2010 — and they were still publishing together as Lu awaited trial. Beyond the 2024 monograph, Fluidized Bed Reactors for Carbon Capture, the two men are listed as co-authors on a further book chapter that appeared in October 2025, about a year after Lu’s arrest.

3. There was a murder in the UK of a prominent politician. But the bigger threat to civilization than the killer is the media. This has become the new normal. The media fabricates or enforces a state narrative in a way that the public is mentally disarmed and unable to know what is and is not a threat to them, their children, their safety, their wealth and their very identity.

Pay close attention to this man’s analysis.

4. Now the Canadian version of the same problem. I have to say, this bowled me over when I saw it several days ago. Watch the CBC anchor during what is sold to the public as a “news” broadcast actually contradict the people they interview in the bit from the studio. Not on location where they can explain themselves, but in the post production, and in the most patronizing and condescending way imaginable. He defines democracy for them to make them appear like right wing ignorant hicks. Which is the CBC way. And without any of them having the chance to explain themselves. it would be interesting to see the uncut footage of the interviews as well. I would bet that they cut out much of what was said that makes their case for them. CBC likely cut it to give the worst impression, then smirks them off in that oh-so-CBC way of mocking the rubes.

The anchor defines “democracy” for them without asking one of them what they meant or why they felt it was “totalitarian”. And given the Trudeau Carney regime of the last dozen years or more, I bet they are closer to reality than the truth-averse CBC are on every issue.

5. Donald Best tweet: Health Canada proves the dialectical nature of its name again. Health Canada isn’t its intention. It is its target.

Full text:

1/ Another FOI home run for
@scoopsmcgoo
… this time it’s in Health Canada’s confidential internal documents.

Straight from the released file: “it was not known or expected that these plasmids would contain the SV40 enhancer.”

2/ Pfizer didn’t tell Health Canada – and that’s against the law. The FOI docs state SV40 promoter was in every lot released in Canada and “was not previously disclosed by Pfizer.” Pfizer was required to inform Health Canada, and they decided not to.

3/ When Health Canada saw the health issue – they stepped around it. The internal email admits the author “left out any analysis into impact on human health,” and instead framed it “more regulatory along with negative public perception.”

Once again, the people supposed to be looking out for Canadians are more concerned with image than safety.

4/ Remember what this actually is: experimental genetic (mRNA) technology. And in Sept 2021 the very definition of “vaccine” was quietly changed.

Ask yourself why the category needed adjusting right as these experimental and untested genetic treatments were rolled out.

5/ And here’s the risk they never tested: the Covid shots contain stray DNA carrying an SV40 promoter… which raises the question of whether that DNA can splice into your genome.

This isn’t fiction. In an X-SCID trial, gene therapy gave almost half the children leukemia.

So before injecting billions with the COVID vaccine, someone should have tested whether that residual DNA – carrying the SV40 promoter, wrapped in lipid nanoparticles built to enter cells – can integrate into the human genome. That safety study was never done.

And the one safety limit they did set was blown through. Some Pfizer lots had up to 153 times the approved limit of residual DNA.

Scientists have a word for that: contamination. That’s what Pfizer hid from governments and health authorities.

6/ None of this needs exaggeration. It’s in the government’s own released paperwork. Read it and decide for yourself.

Government docs + full breakdown at his website. Link in next comment…

Reader’s Links for July 19th, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.