Brand sentencing is proof there is not two tiered justice

Posted on by — Leave a reply

This is not a small point, nor is it an attempt at being clever. This matters. A lot.

The UK is communist in the most classical sense, but in a modern method of execution. it is also being implemented in stages as opposed to all at once. We are in a phase of that revolution across the West and most noticeably to we English speakers in the Anglosphere for obvious reasons. That is the news and social media posts we can understand. Germany and other Western nations are also undergoing the same process though.

A  central feature of a communist revolution is the movement upwards of political power from the individual to the state. That power can then be exorcised in what seems as even a whimsical way by the faceless bureaucrats and leaders who run the state. False narratives that are clearly and obviously untrue can be invented and launched on to the public with massive consequences to the culture and people’s most fundamental rights. Opposing them is initially fought by unofficial state thugs like ANTIFA or BLM, Me Too movement etc. while the revolution is still nascent and then later as the revolution becomes mature, by statute. Off the top of my head I can’t think of a better example than Canadian bill C4 that criminalizes parents if they try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming care” after a state agent like a teacher or councillor talked them into it. Usually with an insane metaphysic like “being born in the wrong body”. This one dialectic is all of the above in one Line of Operation.

In a modern Communist state, the crime most important to power is to stand against a state narrative from a position of authority. That will be punished severely. We can know this by what happened to every doctor or scientist that objected to the Covid measures and the mRNA injection mandates. Any doctor, scientific authority or influential journalist who spoke against these insane measures found their lives destroyed. This site is too full of examples to mention here although the first one we interviewed personally, Dr. Mary O’Connor is truly a stellar example of the state modus operandi and its consequences. They will not call it that though. They will use a device and the most convenient one for wealthy powerful or famous men is usually the ‘Me Too’ method of negating a person by accusations of sexual misconduct. The British have been doing this a while now. They did it to Vladimir Bukovski. He was a high profile ex-Soviet citizen who escaped to the UK and become well known for explaining that the EU was in fact a reproduction of the Soviet system of control and even by design of the USSR. He was cancelled in the UK for illegal pornographic material on his computer.

For those who want to know more about Bukovsky, find anything you can by Diana West on him. Also there are still lots of videos of his lectures. They are worth it if you want to know what the true nature of the EU is.

Brand also went against state narratives. During Covid he was pretty good actually. We were personally suspicious of how someone of his stature could actually stand against the Western States’ narratives on Covid and the Vaxx and not be arrested. Those questions are here somewhere on that site. But he went against a lot of state narratives and did point out some of the dialects directed against reality itself. Like the metaphysic of people being born in the wrong body. There is a video at the bottom of this post where he spends over half an hour with Charlie Kirk on some of these.

We covered somewhat on another post in the last few days the obvious contrast between how Muslims who do real rape are handled in the UK (and in the West in general) with evidence, DNA, video, recent testimony and witnesses. These cases are pretty much treated like littering or parking infractions. Ok some of the worst do time somewhat close to Brand’s sentence, although I don’t know how long they serve inside, but their crimes are crimes. Not 20 year old allegations resting on reframed descriptions of events where the names of the accusers are not known, and police actually asked them to come forward. No right to face the accuser. In France not that long ago, a Muslim broke into an elderly Jewish woman’s apartment, raped her and threw her off her balcony to her death. He was acquitted because he was smoking Marijuana at the time. I bet you Russel was high on a lot more than that when he was hitting on women who didn’t seem to object at the time. And why am I comparing France to England? Because they are all undergoing the same communist revolution at the same time, deploying the same revolutionary methods against their legacy populations. The mass import of hostile aliens, the transformation of Rule of Law into this hybridized Sharia-Communist system, the raising to the level of sacred scripture of state narrative and the total capture of mass media and replacement of truth with language that forces people of legacy culture to accept the morbid and grotesque untruths  as morally superior to how every culture everywhere throughout all of history would deal with these issues.

As we have said many times, hate speech laws are the secular equivalent of blasphemy laws in Muslim countries. And like blasphemy laws, they are applied in ways that increases state power. Not in any form of equal application of justice. We see that across the West and especially in the UK and soon Canada, where people are being arrested by the tens of thousands for criticizing Islam even in a totally factual and important way, while in Mosques 5X a day they openly call for the extermination of Jews and Christians. This again, is NOT two tiered justice. It has a Telos. It has a purpose. It has an end state which all of the enforcement and judgments and so on point to. This is not corruption of a system. it is an entirely new system with a different objective than the one people are feverishly clinging to and imagining still exists.

At this point people actually know the real laws. Legacy British people know what will happen if they accuse a migrant, especially a Muslim or rape. The chances of them being arrested for pointing out the Islamic fact of their behaviour, dress and so on means they might more likely be arrested than the rapist.

No. This is not an exaggeration and has been the case for over 10 years now. Again, read Peter McLoughlin‘s book, Easy Meat or watch the interview in Michael Hansen’s movie, Killing Europe with a Rotherham Harem survivor.

Tommy Robinson is another obvious example of this system from day 1. The fact that he has managed to keep going despite the time in jail in multiple sentences, one of which was for actually questioning convicted Muslim Harem operators in the UK, is close to a miracle.

(As another aside, reading or listening to the Audiobook of Aristotle’s The Politics is wonderful to behold as we see the same issues and problems from three centuries before Christ. It offers a wry smile on every couple of pages for those contemplating the trade-offs a society has to make between power ,money and populations and even collectivization vs. individualism. So that didn’t start with Marx or Hegel.)

So in essence then, The UK, Canada, France etc. do NOT have a “two tiered justice system”. They have a very different system of laws and enforcement that people will either not understand, or most commonly, refuse to allow themselves to believe that such a thing is possible. They will cling to some version of Hanlon’s Razor that this is a corruption of the system they must believe still exists rather than accept that a fundamentally new system altogether is in place.

For example I know two men personally in Canada who in divorce court, the judge tilted the table against the fathers and explained why by using the word, “Patriarchy” in the court. This is no small thing. This is a negation of all fairness and the systematic attribution of malevolence to the male simply because he is a male. In both cases, the facts, the money, the custody of children made zero difference. It was a narrative dictated decision. Males are of the patriarchy, and therefore all judgements must heavily favour the female.

Look at what happened to people who gave a few dollars to the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, before the trucks even arrived in that city for the protest. They had their accounts frozen by the state, and state thugs, namely ANTIFA attacked their homes and businesses. Those people just supported those who opposed totalitarian communist state narratives on movement, business and forced injections. And while the protest was still legal in the old fashioned sense of being legal. In other words, within the rights of the individual. Trudeau and Carney both passed bills that totally obliterate the individual’s rights to freedom of speech, control over your children’s decisions including not to get spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming-Care”. And that is just one dialectic of many.

Frankly this subject really is the coinage of this site for the last at least 7 years. But in summary, calling it “two-tired-justice is to miss the target to the point where you have no effective opposition to it. Understand the enemy first. Then develop strategies and tactics. Ezra Levant may be the first person to defeat the “Canadian Human Rights Commissions”, itself a communist (and dialectical) organization who’s purpose is to remove human rights and create state controlled collective ‘rights’. Rights which are to be dialectically enforced like all the other examples given here, with Russel brand’s conviction and sentence being the anchor. Levant managed to defeat the previously undefeated “Human Rights Courts” by shining a powerful light on what they do to people. But that tactic no longer works because of the sheer volume of what people see as gross injustices by the state. It is now too much to bear and people switch off. As another rather laser sharp example of the dialectical nature of the CHRC,they convicted ethnic hair-waxing salons and fined them out of business because they refused to wax the testicles of a man who decided to claim he was a woman, and therefore his testicles had been alchemically converted into a Vulva and they were legally obliged to wax it. The CHRCs agreed. You can look up Johnathan Yaniv on this site or Blazing Cat Fur and find the whole ordeal in detail.

 

This understanding matters because the only shot we have to recover an individualist state, what people call a Democracy, is first, to understand we can’t fix this system within the system when it is not the system we think it is whatsoever. We have to understand what has actually taken place and we have to stage a counter-revolution to either reclaim what our ancestors have built, or more likely, re invent the wheel. Create a proper Constitution like the US one in modern and clear language with solid lines drawn between state power and individual rights, and then describe the machinery needed to preserve that constitution, fight for it, then raise children with an understanding of the system and how to preserve it.

The number of people who voluntarily left school and university to go fight WW2 compared to how many students dropped out to protest the Vietnam war tells us a lot about how education was captured first and what that led to is now obvious.

Still, Russel Brand is really just one data point for this thesis.

The following videos are good descriptions of what happened to Brand other than they call it a miscarriage of justice, or an example of a two tiered state. Again, it’s neither. It is in fact, a good example of the actual system that is now in place.

34 minutes of Charlie Kirk and Russel Brand. Both ‘inconvenient’ men are now dealt with.

Frankly, we don’t know or care if Brand’s Christianity is an act or not. if he is sincere, it will have the benefit of making his jail term easier. The value of faith is it allows greater endurance of suffering. One might argue that is why it exists in the first place. But he certainly looks like he is in the category of those canceled by the Communist state for opposing its narratives, whatever else he may be.

The following video has some crude imagery. but he gets a lot of the important elements right.

Reader’s Links for Nov. 10th, 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

About the mid terms, Canada, as a communist polity (lots on that) and the UK as a diseased state: Links 1 for Nov. 9, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

As a brief aside, I got a call from one of the most educated on East Europe, Communism, and Islam this morning about the post from last night where I speculated that the Polish attacker may in fact be a National Bolshevik. She informed me that the date of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 according to the Julian Calendar, was Nov 7th. So it adds a real data point to my hypothesis. In fact it may even make the cut as a theory at this point. And if he isn’t specifically a Dugenist, or as they say, NazBol, he is NOT anything like what we would call “right Wing”, Picking that date is a nod to communism, and the communist revolution. Not like, July 4th or anything.

More information also tilts heavily towards this being a German. His social media was full of pictures of playing cards, but they were all from German decks as opposed to Russian or Polish or Ukrainian. There were other indicators that he was German, or acting for Germany, or his personal motives were connected to German identity as he saw it.

1. Richard left this comment this morning on the site:

The odds of the Dems winning 29 of 30 contested Senate seats are over 5500 to 1 there is no way that election was honest.

There is an article about this on The Gateway Pundit but I can’t figure out how to paste the URL on my phone

I would like to answer it with the contents of an email I received this morning. No additional comment from me. I have not looked into it yet.

It appears that there is a distinct possibility of election fraud in
the midterms. The “15% band” identifies a fairly uniform 15% of votes
that went from Trump to Democrats, fairly uniformly across all
election races. It appears to be the result of algorithmic bias.

I maintain a catalog of articles on possible election fraud at:

Ballot Busting
https://www.cairco.org/news/ballot-busting

This isn’t conspiracy theory stuff, but rather, reporting of
information that the mainstream media buries.

I have found Gateway Pundit to be an excellent resource, and Geller
Report is quick to report on election irregularities.

My opinion is that election fraud is involved. It simply doesn’t make
intuitive sense that conservatives abandoned MAGA en masse to vote
for socialists and communists,

2. CBC assists the Marxist effort to make facts into hate speech when used in a way that may interfere with the communist destruction of nation states

Regina councillor shared great replacement conspiracy theory with colleagues during mosque broadcast debate

Experts say it’s concerning to see city councillor share Islamophobic conspiracy theory

As Regina debated a mosque’s decision to broadcast a call to prayer, Ward 1 Coun. Dan Rashovich forwarded an email to his colleagues that contained what experts say is the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, which falsely suggests immigrants are attempting to replace a country’s white population.

The email, obtained by CBC News through a freedom of information request, says the Islamic call to prayer or adhan is a “strategic tactic” to expand Islam in Canada through changing demographics.

“Thank You for your email. You nailed it!” Rashovich wrote in an email CC’d to every member of Regina city council, as well as Regina police Chief Lorilee Davies, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and provincial Justice Minister Tim McLeod.

Rashovich declined multiple requests for an on-camera interview.  Instead, in a series of emailed statements, Rashovich said he did not see the email’s entire contents before sharing it.

If Canada wasn’t already a communist country, the good councillor would have countered the accusation with readily in evidence facts. For example the UN Replacement Migration policy papers. Or the UN Migration Compact of 2018 and any number of facts showing that people defended from classical civ, and not just ethnically, but who hold a belief in classical civ are being disenfranchised all over the west. But instead he did what any Soviet denizen would do. he denied knowing what the email said.

3. There has been several attacks on Jewish owned restaurants in Montreal recently. The most recent one was on the anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Nazi night of Broken Glass when Nazis went out in numbers to German streets and attacked Jewish stores.

4. Back to the subject of Canada as a communist polity:

Signal explains why it may bail on Canada thanks to laws that force them to pony up Canadian’s communications to the state

A complete lack of description of someone wanted for assaulting a woman in Ottawa feels pretty commie as well for that matter.

Oh and this of course.

And this:

5. I guess Canadians can at least say, “Well at least we’re not the UK!

Thank you all for reading this site. 

 

 

 

Reader’s links for Nov. 9th, 2026

Posted on by — 8 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

Poland & Russel Brand: Links post 1 for Nov. 8th, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

There really is a great deal going on and a great deal of propaganda and disinformation surrounding it.

The attack in Poland is probably very much aligned with the cult of Alexander Dugin known as “national Bolsheviks”, which was the same group the 2 kids who shot up a mosque and Gardner in the US recently and then shot each other was connected to, and of course most famously, the Christchurch NZ shooter.

So far no symbols such as the Black Sun has been shown to the public, as Poland, now being an EU/UN communist state is feverishly trying to call the man who murdered his own family then trued for a mass casualty event in Warsaw, “far right wing”, as they always do.

Here is some of what has found its way to the public.

At the moment there is no evidence linking him to National Bolshevism. And I am not arguing that absesnce of evidence is evidence of censorship. There may not be a link at all. But it’s a reasonable theory given how the media treated the Christchurch attacker of mosques. They made possession of his maniefsto illegal and immediately rewrote it to suit a leftist internationalist anti-Nation-state agenda, linking Trump and so on and so on. The document is now widely available online other than for New Zealanders. So it’s a worthy hypothesis.

Interestingly, there are convoys of German military vehicles in Poland now for some reason. Some opinion publishers suggest an eerily German scent to events in Poland recently in general. One Polish ex-pat we spoke with at some length has deep suspicions that this is a German op. A kind of political false flag to get Poland under German control. Not the first time they tried that, so…

Well, not for SOME reason. For this reason. Or is it an excuse?

The other thing that is dominating the attention-o-sphere is the conviction of Russel Brand. People arguing on one or the other side of the issue feel the need to state what they think of him. Actually what matters is rule of law and do we have any. And no, we don’t. There is tons and tons of videos and opinion pieces out there more informed and better than anything I could write. Instead, I ask you to look at these links and ask yourself to compare the coverage and justice of it, to what Russel Brand is alleged to have done, 20 years ago.

Full text:

“They tried to penetrate every opening of our bodies.”

German woman Claudia Vosen and her daughter suffered a mass sexual assault at the hands of Arabs during the Cologne New Year’s Eve attacks of 2015/16.

After the harrowing sexual assaults, Vosen faced a new hell from co-workers who called her racist.

She is speaking out now, a decade later, to EMMA magazine.

She said when migrants finished sexually assaulting them over the course of a half-hour, the women were “spat out.” Vosen filed a complaint that night; she was one of 627 women who did so just in one city, Cologne.

What followed, she said, was almost as damaging as the attack.

“When I arrived at work in January and told everyone what had happened to me, they said: ‘You’re crazy. They really messed me up. What are you saying… that’s not true. Otherwise we would have heard or read something. You have something against foreigners,’” said Vosen. “Everything was swept under the rug. That was the worst part. It was denied, covered up.”

Vosen’s daughter also suffered. On the schoolyard, her daughter heard, “Just be glad you weren’t raped.”

Vosen’s daughter began avoiding groups of young men who appeared Arab.

“Young women don’t defend themselves the way we used to,” says the mother. “They no longer dare to laugh in the face of a group of boys who cause them problems. They answer cautiously. They are afraid.”

“New Year’s Eve opened my eyes,” said Claudia Vosen. “For me, there is a before and an after.”

She also stated that afterwards, the demonstrations were not against the mass sexual assaults and rapes but instead focused on “racism.”

She said these protesters did not act out of solidarity with the victims but with the migrants.

“Instead of simply saying who the perpetrators are, whether right or left. We weren’t allowed to say back then: ‘Those were Arabs.’ All that remained was: people with a foreign appearance,” she said.

Nationwide, 1,200 women filed reports of sexual violence that fateful night. Estimates indicated the number of men involved at more than 2,000.

Cologne Police President Wolfgang Albers initially called the night “largely peaceful.”

Days later, he admitted, as reported by the BBC, that a “very large number of sexual assaults” had been committed by groups of young men “largely of North African or Arab appearance.”

An internal federal police report revealed that women ran a “gauntlet” through masses of heavily intoxicated foreign men “that words cannot describe.” The report labeled the scene as “chaotic and shameful.”

North Rhine-Westphalia Interior Minister Ralf Jäger later told a state parliamentary committee that the perpetrators were “almost exclusively” people with a migration background.

“All signs point to these being North Africans and people from the Arab world,” he said, adding that asylum seekers who had arrived just months earlier were among the suspects.

Of 153 suspects identified in Cologne for offenses that night, about two-thirds were from Morocco or Algeria; roughly 44% were asylum seekers and another 12% were believed to be in Germany illegally.

However, actual convictions were almost non-existent due to the chaos and the lack of footage, which means hundreds of women went without justice.

From the UK. But frankly, as shocking as this example is, anyone who read Peter McLoughlin’s book, Easy Meat which was a 100% vetted and properly researched book on Muslim Harems, or what should be called, “Child-sex slavery of non-Muslim girls, would know how stunningly typical this is in the UK now, and for at least the last twenty years. The Pakistani Muslims who kept Charlene Downs in sex slavery, then killed and fed her body to the public in Kebabs, which is how all available evidence shows this took place, were not convicted of anything. That case in fact is what promoted Tommy Robinson to prominence. No one else would publicize the case and Tommy managed to get major protests out about it and the issue of Islamic harems of British girls in general. This is why the British state has been using all its power to persecute him while being careful not to martyr him. Another reason by the way, we should always remember the name of Kevin Crehan, who died in prison serving a one year sentence for leaving a strip of bacon on a mosque doorknob. No harm to anyone, and no violence whatsoever. Just left some bacon. The formal charge in a rational world MIGHT be littering. he got the death penalty by proxy.

And three more picked at random.

Adil Rashid (Nottingham, UK, 2013)
An 18-year-old Muslim from Birmingham, educated in a madrassa/Islamic school, met a 13-year-old girl on Facebook, arranged to meet her, and had sex with her (statutory rape). He claimed he did not know it was illegal because of his “sheltered” upbringing and education that devalued women. Judge Michael Stokes at Nottingham Crown Court imposed a nine-month youth custody sentence suspended for two years, plus a two-year probation order. The judge cited Rashid’s sexual naivety, immaturity, and passivity, and said immediate custody would do “more damage than good.” Reporting at the time noted that comparable cases typically attracted 4–7 years’ imprisonment.? Daily Mail

Mohamed Aziz Ben Ishak (Quebec, Canada, 2026 reporting of earlier offence)
A Tunisian national (temporary resident) violently assaulted his partner after she lit a cigarette before sunset during Ramadan. He kicked her in the ribs, punched her repeatedly in the head, extinguished a lit cigarette on her forearm, and dragged her by the hair. A Quebec court judge granted a conditional discharge (no conviction/criminal record if conditions are met) plus three years’ probation and 240 hours of community service. The judge described the sentence as “lenient” and acknowledged it was unlikely to satisfy the victim, while taking into account the offender’s lack of prior record, remorse, and immigration status.? Nationalpost

Afghan refugee (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, 2021)
A refugee from Afghanistan sexually assaulted a stranger in Kitchener. Justice Karey Katzsch accepted a joint Crown-defence recommendation for a conditional discharge (finding of guilt but no conviction, with conditions). The defence highlighted that a conviction risked deportation and possible execution by the Taliban; the judge agreed to the non-custodial outcome. This is one of several Canadian cases in which immigration consequences have been weighed in sexual-offence sentencings involving newcomers.?Therecord

Again, whatever else we think of Russel Brand, compare what happened to him with, well what you read on an X feed pretty much every day if you look for that sort of thing. This is not an injustice. This is the justice of a totally different system than the one people think they live in.

Thank you all for reading this site:

Reader’s Links for Nov. 8th, 2026

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

Western Standard interview with Libertarian head of the Dominion Society

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Interesting interview overall I think.

Here at Castle Tepes we have been crazy busy for the last few days on related materials. Of course what happened during the mid terms deserves discussion, but it’s not like there isn’t a lot of excellent analysis all over the place. So we didn’t see any need to add to it. it think most people know what happened here. And President Trump and the Republican part have more than a small share of the blame here.

In any case, this is an interesting video of a kind of moderate libertarian on the state of Canada.

It is we who say he is libertarian by the way. He speaks for himself in this interview, and very well.

Reader’s Links for Nov. 7th, 2026

Posted on by — 5 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

Reader’s Links for Nov. 6th, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

Indigiqueer and other dialectical neologisms, The Allison Inquiry and more: Links post 1 for Nov. 5, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. I am posting this as a personal thing. One of the narrative attacks on the US that irks me the most, is the one that claims the US moon landing never took place. I watched it live, but granted, I was VERY young at the time. But what I do remember well, was that it was probably the most unifying event in Human history. The US went to great pains to make this a human accomplishment, rather than just an American one. People across the world celebrated it like a personal victory.

I have personally challenged, and castigated people on open line radio shows that were hawking their books or otherwise making a couple of bucks by denigrating this accomplishment as an American hoax. I put it in the same category as that history book now taught in high schools with a purely cynical and critical theory attack on the US.

So I found this video to be refreshing. Also for those interested, and looking for a great night’s entertainment, find the Australian film, The Dish. A very enjoyable account of how the moon landing was actually carried to the world by a small radio telescope in a sheep paddock in Australia. By the same people who did Strictly Ballroom and Castle I believe, which are also really charming and entertaining films.

2. There were 4 days of testimony at The Allison Inquiry in Ottawa in early Sept. We posted just a few of them, and especially where we had a chance to interview some of the people giving testimony. But not posting someone is not a measure of the quality or value of the testimony whatsoever. It is more a statement about what time permits, and what decisions have to be made completely independent of the value of the testimony. For those interested in what the Covid measures did to people, Canadians as the example here, but if you saw Senator Johnson’s testimony clearly it is also Americans, interested parties may want to watch all of it. Schedule a little time on weekends or something and pick one and watch.

Links to them all are here:

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3 and 4 can be seen by clicking day 1 or day 2 and scrolling down the page.

For the moment, here is a lawyer who is involved in litigation against the state who explains the machinery behind the ironically named, (dialectical) compensation program, where state money was funnelled to the bureaucracy and nearly none of it made it to vaxx injured Canadians.

This fellow also was profoundly inspirational. This is not a victim statement. This is a personal triumph over becoming a victim despite massive vaccine injury. It was extraordinary to be in the room when this man spoke. In a private conversation with him afterwards, his general knowledge and fields of expertise are as impressive as the bio he gave in the testimony.

3. The problem is that this kind of thing is so astonishingly common now, that we could, and many do like RMX news, make the entire content about showing incidents of Muslims and illegal migrants raping, stealing from, beating and killing indigenous Europeans.

Law is, and this is a point we simply do not make often enough, nothing at all but a codification of a people’s values. A group of people with shared values, be it a tribe or a country, is a nation. The Nation of Israel for example, refers to jews worldwide who are assumed to have a common set of shared values. And laws in all places are the codification of whatever values the people there have. Unless they are corrupted by communism of course.

When you mass import a large group of people into a location with fundamentally different values than those already there, the laws will change, because it becomes impossible to enforce the legacy laws. This is of course, accelerated by programs like multiculturalism, that insist the way to deal with Islamic mass sex-slavery of non-Muslim females is to make muslims into the police. This has very predictable results. One of the two men in the conversation below makes on critical error. It is not that Muslims see women as communal property. It is that Muslims see themselves as having the Allah-granted right to take as personal property any non-Muslim woman they want to and then do whatever they want with them. When it comes to Muslim women, they do not see them as communal property but as each man’s personal “tilth”.

4. This may be the most complicated protest sign yet on parliament Hill. If anyone has a clue what it is about, please explain in the comments.

5. I learned a new word today. I learned it while helping a friend film the monument for $15M (not including the value of the prime land it occupies) for “survivors” of LGBTQ+ETC oppression. The word is: INDIGIQUEER

Which is a neologism worthy of the German language that is an amalgam of “indigenous” – invoking the must-never-be-questioned suffering of the tribal peoples on the continent before Europeans sailed to North America – and “queer”, which people mistakenly think means homosexual, but in fact means taking a dialectical position against civilizational normalcy.

(Video explaining that below)

Here is a screen grab from the video of the monument, which itself is actually pretty cynical. It is essentially a giant phallic-like inside-out disco ball reminiscent of the 1980s Disco motif. For a monument that is to memorialize supposed oppression and injustice, it does not communicate anything resembling dignity.

imagine a Holocaust memorial as a statue of a bunch of religious-looking Jewish people dancing the Hora around the opening of a new retail store by analogy.

But this memorial to various persecuted sexual preference groups as an inverted disco ball, looks more like a money laundering op complete with (yes, for real) a strobe light inside to really enhance that disco ball effect.

But in its defence, the likely massive money-laundering true purpose of this object does make it very much Canadian.

 

To understaand the concept of “Queer” as it is actually used by the current crop of communist dialectical engineers, watch the following video:

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This is fascinating! Did you know that Roman Emperor’s actually tried the same con that Mamdani is attempting in New York and the NDP in Canada?

Reader’s Links for Nov. 5th, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

Reader’s Links for Nov. 4, 2026

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani

A few thoughts about Russia, Ukraine & Poland

Posted on by — Leave a reply

 

(Before I make my case, and frankly it’s more of an open question than it is a case, I feel it’s important to point out one fact. If anyone chooses to read this, please do so with some caution. I am out of my wheelhouse here. But the video of the feminist group asking for an audit on Ukraine spending in this post doesn’t require any analysis from me. So watch that anyway and decide for yourselves what that means.
But I have dug my own rabbit hole here for anyone who is interested. Of course, any counter arguments or ideas to the contrary are most welcome. Pelase deliver them in the spirit this is written. Thinking out loud. Not prognosticating or in any way being didactic.)

I see Ukrainian flags everywhere in my city in Canada. From what I know, it is mostly on the homes and cars of leftists who have all the correct narrative views on everything. But one thing I absolutely do notice, is that never has there been a report of roving gangs of Russian thugs, torching cars or breaking windows of homes with the Ukrainian flags in or on them. But put an Israeli flag out and chances are you won’t even get an insurance pay out for what happens. And certainly not twice.

This is a meaningful stat. Interpret it how you will. But it sure seems like Russia and Russians are not the enemy they were made out to be by the state-media complex. But the Anti-Israel complex is indeed a state-media creation. Like the facts of Russia-Ukraine, they are non-existent on CBC. Just approved narrative attacks.

This video we post now and again because, well it shows how the people of the Donbas were treated by the Ukrainian state:

This is from 2014:

But here’s the October surprise, as it were, here in Canada. From what might be called a legacy feminist no less. From CPAC

 

She goes farther than simply accusing Carney of money laundering. She questions the moral authority of the war itself on its premise. She is decidedly contradicting the narrative of an “unprovoked aggression” by Russia. (Although personally I don’t like Jeffrey Sachs as a source, but he is only one of the sources she quotes, and I can’t remember why I don’t like him as one)

In 2018, President Trump went to Germany and spoke at a NATO summit, specifically warning Germany that they had made themselves totally dependant on Russian energy. In fact, Germany has torn down to the roots a brand new state of the art coal plant for electric generation that produced very little CO2 for those that believe this is a problem. Merkel signed the Nord Stream deal in 2015, and once the war was imminent, they did not allow delivery of LNG. But Germany, France etc. really did destroy their own energy production including nuclear, Which you know, doesn’t convert any carbon into gas form.

  • The dependency on Russian oil was built with full knowledge before the war — 2015 deal, Trump’s 2018 warning delivered to their faces at NATO, US sanctions on the project from December 2019, and Germany kept laying pipe anyway (construction resumed December 2020 despite sanctions).
  • They didn’t stop when they saw the war coming — pipeline finished September 2021 with troops already massing; even the certification freeze only came February 22, 2022, two days before the invasion, and even then it was Scholz, not Merkel (she left office December 2021).
  • Merkel defended the decision after the war started, with full knowledge of what it produced — “Nord Stream 2 was not a mistake,” “even in the Cold War, Russia was a reliable energy supplier.” She didn’t sin off on it post invasion. But that she still defended the policy in hindsight after seeing the invasion her policy funded. She had all the information in the world and said she’d do it again.
  • The invader’s revenue flowed regardless — NS2 never opened, but Germany kept buying through Nord Stream 1, the Polish and Ukrainian transit lines, and later LNG — ~€140 billion to Russia in the first year of the war. They built a second pipeline to double the money flow while being warned, and when it was blown up in September 2022, the flow just went through the other pipes.

Then we get to Poland today.

The European Union, which has an astonishing track record of destroying sovereignty, conning member states into surrendering self interest to faceless overpaid bureaucrats in the European Commission, and a litany of other crimes against culture and individuality like mass immigration of Muslims, seem to have managed to pull of a coup in Poland where a successful leader of Poland for the Polish people has been replaced with an EU sycophant.

And now suddenly, there are troops amassed on the Polish border with Russia, although that looks like it may have been a fairly normal response to a Russian military exercise. And given that a Russian military exercise immediately preceded the invasion of the Donbas, was probably a good idea.

Speaking with a knowledgeable Polish expat we know who speaks 5 languages fluently today, Her speculation was interesting.

Poland, I am told, now holds more gold than the European Central Bank. Around 632 tonnes. The ECB, 507.

  • Poland is Europe’s largest gold BUYER — by far. It added ~50 tonnes recently per the World Gold Council, holds the top spot on the biggest-increases list, and the NBP has approved a plan for up to 150 more tonnes, targeting 20%+ of reserves in gold and a stated goal around 700+ tonnes.
  • Poland is the largest holder in Central and Eastern Europe — Russia aside (and Russia’s ~2,300t is Asia-booked in most analyses since much is held in China/own vaults).
  • Poland is the only major European economy whose gold program is explicitly framed as insurance. Glapiski has said categorically: gold is held domestically in Polish vaults specifically because “in the event of a crisis, external markets could become inaccessible” — and Poland repatriated 100 tonnes from London in 2019.

Poland is also a hold out against the Euro. And the EU doesn’t like that at all. They recently suckered Bulgaria into switching to the Euro and our friends there are reporting massive increase in costs of living as a result.

And Poland now faces the EU’s excessive deficit procedure. And the EU is actively trying to hook Poland’s rearmament into EU financing: the SAFE-style EU loans come with a requirement that 65% of components come from EU/Ukraine-based companies — which deliberately excludes Poland’s two main suppliers, the US and South Korea (National Defense Magazine). Warsaw has been resisting: “Poland takes Brussels’s billions but wants US, Korean weapons.” So yes — there is a live EU effort to make Poland’s military build-up financially dependent on Brussels and to redirect the procurement to German/French industry.

It’s almost as if the EU/Germany was more concerned about screwing over Trump and the USA than its own survival. Getting Poland away from its independence through gold holdings, and forcing it to stop using the USA as its supplier of military equipment.

In terms of Tusk and his politics, The Guardian’s account and Politico’s both note the EU Commission immediately sided with Tusk. Which tells you a lot.

Here is some speculation sent in by another reader that the coup in Poland could be a precursor to Martial law there:

….could be a pretext to introduce martial law ???
=====================
Poland foils attempted ‘provocation’ on Russian border, PM Tusk says
====================
Großeinsatz in Polen an Grenze zu Kaliningrad
=================
Polnischer Spezialeinsatz an Grenze zu Kaliningrad
In any case, it was interesting to see leftist, feminist, albeit legacy 60s feminists, or, “first wave” as the following more clearly Marxist wave, speaking against the Ukrainian-Russian narrative.

Reader’s Links for Nov. 3rd, 2026

Posted on by — 10 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meani