Two new narrative attacks and moral inversions making the news today

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

It appears that the gentleman who managed to commit academic fraud right up to being a very young prof. at a famous Ivy League University has committed suicide. I say appears cause who knows anymore what is actually true. And his suicide appears to be an excellent tool for dialectical media to attack the people who busted his fraudulent career, damaging many people who are actually deserving and their lifetimes of hard work, as well as clearly delivering inferior service to those who paid fortunes and worked extremely hard for the honour being his students.

But really, no matter. What he did or did not do as a result of being exposed is not the responsibility of the people who exposed it. It is the responsibility primarily of the people who committed the fraud, and secondarily the people who enabled it.

As I recall, we did post an article when his fraud was first discovered. We didn’t follow up with the story of his suicide because it isn’t relevant to this site or its purpose. This isn’t a news site. This is a site about trying to understand the forces at worktop destroy Western Civilization and their effectiveness. And how to stop it hopefully.

Alex Berenson did a good story on his death though. You can read that here.

Berenson appears to put most of the blame and the enablers. Maybe so.

Meanwhile, the purveyors of narrative, the ones that want to make moral equivalence between attackers and defenders, the ones who want to make the person exposing the crime guilty while the criminal is a victim, they are hard at work attacking those who exposed this pseudo-Prof.

A few articles on this below:

DEI Fraud and Cover-Up at Cambridge

“Wouldn’t it be the most ridiculous story ever told, if the boy who couldn’t read and write at 18 gets a PhD before he’s 30?”

Those are the words of Jason Arday—the 2002 Professorial Chair in the Sociology of Education at Cambridge University. Indeed, the story of his metamorphosis from arguably the most disadvantaged person in the UK to elite scholar-athlete-philanthropist would make even Walt Disney raise an eyebrow.

Born to Ghanaian parents, Arday grew up on a council estate (the British equivalent of Section 8 housing) in south London. At age three he was diagnosed with global development delay and autism. Therapists said he would be confined to an assisted living facility. Miraculously, at 11 years old, he spoke his first word (“hello”). When he was 18, he learned to read and write.

Under the influence of a white high school teacher who “gave [him] agency,” Arday pursued higher education. After receiving a PhD from Liverpool John Moores University, he rocketed up the academic ladder as a scholar of racism, education, and inequality. In three years he went from senior lecturer at Roehampton (2018) to associate professor at Durham (2019) to professor at Glasgow (2021). Ivy League universities (plural) tried to recruit him, but he had his heart set on Oxford or Cambridge. In 2023, at age 37, he became the youngest black full professor in the history of Cambridge. He is one of the youngest people of any race to ever hold a chair professorship at Oxbridge.

In his spare time, Arday ran 30 marathons in 35 days and 300 miles in three days.

As of 2023, he had worked with “more than 70” charities and raised more than £5 million.

And here we go…

The language used by the university is a pretty excellent example of how to turn a criminal into a victim and those who notice and point out the crime as the criminal. Remember, we are still in the Defacto stage of the conversion of Rule of Law to dialectical communism. The official nature of the revolution is coming fast. But they are still using the language you see in the Tweet to justify “investigation” and likely a law suit and other extralegal means of punishing him.

Speaking of frauds, it appears Spanish media used a Kuwaiti wealthy party girl to pretend to be an illegal migrant in Cueta being raped and abused by the locals. You may have seen the story, they are doing all they can to propagate it. They have an interview of her camped out on the street. But they don’t show her TikTok’s dancing in the Middle East.

Reuters doing their part of a Maoist Mass Line Narrative attack:

 

Everything about the story appears to be carefully constructed narrative:

APT does their part

 

 

 

A little about Vlad Tepes, the original, another jihadi planning a mass casualty event for Islamic reasons and more: Links 1 for Aug. 21, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

1. The following is an AI video, which actually seems like a good use of AI, but irritatingly is accompanied by an AI written script and voice. The voice I can live with. But the script has that tedious semi poetic prose that especially the free versions of AI generate. (Note to film maker, if you can’t be arsed to write a proper script and show a little personality and emphasis where needed, at least use a good model of AI even if it costs you a couple of bucks) But we are posting it here because the history of its subject, Vlad Tepes, was a small part of the reason of the naming of this site. Because it shows how one person who decided to actually resist Islamic invasion and to fight back, was able to achieve a partial, and temporary albeit, victory.

This AI video’s now very familiar to all, ‘semi-epic prose’ or synthetic lyricism naturally under emphasizes important things and makes one glaze over when they are talking about things that matter. I say naturally because it can’t understand why certain components of the story deserve emphasis or add insight. Although if the person writing the prompts had any insight and was willing to do a little work…

anyway its still an important story for Europe. I would recommend for interested parties, the 2014 movie, Dracula Untold. And yeah, it’s a horror film, and yes it’s entertainment. but it had for the first time a great deal of the facts of the real Dracula. The Real Vlad Tepes who was a hero that some British novelist transformed into the most recognized historical monster, maybe next to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Which is worthy of a post all by itself for that matter.

In this video the main points are there. But importantly, Vlad Tepes learned his military ruthlessness when he was a Janissary. A child soldier given up to the Muslims and raised to be a future soldier to go attack his own former people. Vlad managed to escape and lead his people against the Caliphate. His younger Brother Radu went local though and fought for the Caliph. In any case, Islam still considers Vlad Tepes to be one of their greatest enemies. There was a YouTube lecture by an imam on that. But YouTube changes history every day now. Still, there is a lot of good material on YouTube about the Real Vlad Tepes. Much of it is worth the time.

2. Yesterday in NY a women who converted to Islam, or “reverted” as the Muslims claim in their bizarre temporally inverted universe, was arrested for planing a Jihad attack against government targets.

From our point of view the at least secondarily important component of the story was this:

Bowie converted to Islam approximately five years ago and began using the Islamic name Aisha Saif. That name appears in the court documents and was the identity she operated under while radicalizing and planning the attack.Yet in almost every major news report, the primary name used is Jessica Bowie. The Islamic name is relegated to a parenthetical or a brief aside: “who went by Aisha Saif” or “also known as.” When Western converts to Islam appear in the news for virtually any other reason like activism, celebrity conversions, human-interest stories, or “positive” community profiles media outlets routinely elevate the new Islamic name and treat the birth name as secondary or even disrespectful to mention. I think they even try to quasi-criminalize it as “dead naming:”
When the same type of convert plots mass murder in the name of Islam, the script flips. Suddenly the birth name is restored as the primary identifier, and the Islamic name is treated as a mere alias. The effect is to create distance between the obvious motive the terrorist is framed as a failed Westerner who “went by” a Muslim name, rather than as someone who fully entered and acted upon the ideology she embraced.This selective naming is a quiet but consistent form of narrative management. It protects the brand of Islam by refusing to let the jihadist fully own the identity she claimed. In every other context, that identity is treated as sacred and non-negotiable. In the context of violence, it is quietly set aside.

 

3. The following Tweet is factually correct:

9 of the 18 judges of the International Criminal Court are now under United States sanctions. The 9th was designated on 18th August 2026. She is the Court’s President.The Secretary of State’s statement says the administration “stands ready to take additional measures, if necessary, to systematically dismantle the ICC until it is incapable of threatening American sovereignty.”Tomoko Akane of Japan was elected President in March 2024. She was designated under Executive Order 14203 along with Abdoulaye Seye, a senior trial lawyer in the Office of the Prosecutor.

The same statement says the two “have directly engaged in efforts by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute officials whose government has not consented to ICC jurisdiction.”Designation runs on executive order, not on a criminal charge or a verdict.

Both deputy prosecutors, the former prosecutor and one staff member are designated too.

On 24th July the Assembly of States Parties removed that prosecutor. Secret ballot, 82 in favour against a threshold of 63, for serious misconduct and serious breach of duty.Wind down is authorised through 12.01 a.m. eastern daylight time on 17 September.

I guess that is a blow against the new COMINTERN?

4. The state narrative from Spanish city of Ceuta is that most of the invaders went home right away for some reason. That doesn’t appear to be the case on the ground. It looks more like the invasion is happening in waves.

5. The case of Helen Grus has been wrapped up by the state. We will have a proper analysis and relevant materials soon I hope. For the moment, from Donald Best:

All the text from Det. (Ret.) best’s tweet:

 

@OttawaPolice

offered Detective Helen Grus a deal… If she apologized for starting her investigation – if she abandoned her duty to the public, and to the deceased infants and their families – she would be spared the ordeal of the past four years. If she wouldn’t mention that five of the dead infants died from causes that are listed as adverse effects of the COVID vaccines. IF she would just not talk about the NINE infant deaths. that Ottawa Police are covering up. Helen Grus refused that deal. She remained true to her oath and to her personal integrity. And for that, she and her family have paid dearly – with hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses and four years of attacks.

They stopped Detective Grus because her inquiries threatened to reveal what many medical researchers – and the Pfizer documents – have since confirmed many times over: COVID vaccines can kill and injure infants in the womb and the newly born. And so it was that the Ottawa Police – under the proven influence of Public Health Agency of Canada personnel – suspended, investigated, charged, convicted and punished Detective Helen Grus of ‘Discreditable Conduct’ over an ‘unauthorized investigation’. They even illegally wiretapped Helen and her family in an act of intimidation that yielded no evidence. The internal Tribunal that convicted and sentenced Helen Grus was biased to the core.

Tribunal Officer Chris Renwick refused to allow medical, legal, and police expert witnesses who could prove that Detective Grus was both correct in her suspicions and had a legal right and duty to investigate the infant deaths. Just before Detective Grus was to testify, an Ottawa Police Inspector sent her a criminally threatening email – demanding that she withhold specific evidence and documents from the Tribunal. That’s a criminal offense in Canada: witness tampering and obstruction of justice. The Inspector resigned shortly thereafter. I am not angry at the conviction and sentencing of Detective Helen Grus. I am saddened because it proves that the profession I loved and dedicated my life to is gone. Corrupt. Owned by politics and political agendas. Tribunal Officer Chris Renwick, and Ottawa Chief of Police Eric Stubbs have no idea what they have just unleashed.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Reader’s Links for August 21st, 2026

Posted on by — 5 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Digital Fahrenheit 451, Sharia mayor of Toronto? Spain need a Reconquista 2.0: Links 1 for August 20, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. The Dystopian future novel, Fahrenheit 451 is also coming to pass but in multiple ways, and some unforeseeable and worse ways than the author had envisioned. Not only are the books being destroyed, but they are being absorbed by a giant and infinitely maleable machine such that the books and stories can become whatever is needed for that day’s crop of narrative attacks. Grok tells me the word I want for this is Protean. “extremely changeable and adaptable to any form or purpose.” Get ready to search for Romeo and Juliet to find out they were a mixed race homosexual couple who are celebrated for killing their parents for not accepting their relationship.

2. Can’t see why she wouldn’t be mayor of Toronto. She is the most outrageous and anti-Canadian candidate in the field, so good chance she will become Mayor. Note that we are saying ‘will become mayor’, but not necessarily that she will be elected per se.

As to “hidden agenda”, that all boils down to what you consider to be hidden. She is a sharia compliant Muslim. And Sharia compliant Muslims must, not might or could be or chances are, if she is sharia compliant, she MUST want to make the rest of the world sharia by any and all means she has at her disposal. This is a fundamental of Islam. Not some bogus notion of an “extreme version of it”. There is no Islam without sharia, Islam is sharia. That is not me saying it. That is every Islamic jurist who ever was from the founder of Islam, Mohammad, to everyone since.

So a sharia compliant Muslim has an agenda. it is only hidden to the degree that you don’t understand what that Muslim jurist in the video above explained in 90 seconds.

3. NY woman busted in ISIS-linked plot to bomb state Capitol after converting to Islam, cheering 9/11 attacks: feds

A New York woman plotted to bomb the state Capitol in Albany after pledging allegiance to ISIS and celebrating the 9/11 terror attacks, the FBI said Thursday.

Jessica Bowie, 35, from Albany, allegedly began strategizing the attack in July — and planned to place the bomb in a DoorDash food delivery bag, taking apparent glee in the bloodshed it would cause,the feds wrote in a criminal complaint.

“Blowing kafirs [non-Muslims] brains out is beautiful,” she told someone who turned out to be an FBI informant, the complaint said. 

This article, which does have before and after photos of her conversion, obeys the PC rule of when referring to a Muslim convert doing things that look great for Islam but bad to the rest of us, dead-naming her. They give her Islamic name of Aisha Saif once, but then refer to her as Jessica Bowie for the rest of the article. Interestingly when a person converts to Islam and is in the news for any reason other than terrorism, it is a near crime to use their pre-conversion name. Just in case you thought the New York Post was immune from allowable counter-narratives and dialectic nudging.

4. Just another data point for the true nature of the judicial system in most Western nations now. The fight has to be properly directed.

5. If Spanish Culture is to survive into the future, it may have to do so as a diaspora.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

 

Reader’s Links for Aug. 20, 2026

Posted on by — 12 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

In Canada, biological truth is now a police matter

Posted on by — 11 Comments ↓

Things have been very busy the past couple of days. There should be a slew of new and worthwhile posts over at RAIR Foundation, and hopefully tomorrow we can catch up to some of the revolutionary things (see what I did there?) that are happening around us.
For the moment, Canada has moved criminalization of truth from covert and extralegal to overt and directly handled by the official machinery of state as opposed to proxies like Antifa

Not related other than in that defiance of reality is compulsory way. Ok yeah its totally related actually.

Reader’s Links for Aug. 17, 2026

Posted on by — 17 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Comrade Freeland’s office and the crushing of counter-narrative Canadian patriots

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Asking Grok for verification of this I get:

  • Blacklock’s Reporter published new records showing Chrystia Freeland’s office and the RCMP distributed a federal blacklist of Freedom Convoy sympathizers in 2022 to thousands of corporations, including foreign banks like the Bank of China, with no distribution restrictions.
  • The list targeted trucking companies and individuals linked to the 2022 Ottawa protests against COVID-19 mandates, enabling account freezes under the Emergencies Act that affected millions in funds before the measures were lifted.
  • The blacklist was later subject to legal scrutiny as part of broader challenges to the Act’s use, with the post sparking thread comments on accountability, potential class-action lawsuits, and demands for those involved to face consequences.

If one is looking for even more evidence that the Carney-Trudeau state is the enemy of the Canadian people, this qualifies. But at this point if one doesn’t already understand this, no amount of data points, or even proof such as we got when the Federal Court determined the Emergency measures act was unconstitutional, would convince anyone.

Paywalled Blacklock link here.

https://www.blacklocks.ca/blacklist-checked-by-freeland/

Islam and Nazism still solidly linked

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of five major scholarly and well referenced books on Islam in general, but more recently his focus on Islamic antisemitism, toughed it through 90 minutes of a massively tedious and hate-filled Islamic rant on many things, but primarily on people of Jewish identity.

He isolated the most revealing parts in a condensed video of under 2 minutes and put it together as well as wrote an article for RAIR on it.

The article can be seen here at RAIR Foundation and the extracted minute or so here below.

This connection between the Nazis and Islam is as old as the Nazis themselves. Although to hear this imam above, you would get the idea that Hitler got his views from Islam.

Below is the German-French documentary, the Turban and the Swastika. We found and translated and subtitled this many years before Germany started literally arresting, convicting and sentencing people to JAIL for showing accurate, true, historical photos of the connection between Nazi leaders and Islamic ones. For reals. An interview with one activist for historical truth is below the documentary.

This means that the issue has multiple very important components, as so many do today.

Two other them are:

A: The Nazis and Islam are inexorably linked through their focused and genocidal antisemitism.

B: The German government is determined that you do not know this, because their reboot of Nazism in the current era, is through the mass importation and support of Muslims.

Below, our interview with Michael Stürzenburger about his 6 months (non-custodial) sentence for posting a historical photograph. This was recorded in 2022.

This post, like every post for the last few years, is really about how modern Western communist governments have turned information, notice we are not saying truth, into shape charges against the people via dialectics and any other information warfare you might find in any Soviet propaganda manual. These are what is meant by mass line-narrative attacks. Creating a true (rarely) or partly true (fairly often) or totally fabricated issue and weaponizing it to remove your ability to resist the destruction of your identity. The careful management of how the instruments of state, not just law enforcement but professional bodies like colleges of psychologists and doctors and dentists etc. and unions, and as Trudeau Jr. once said, and which only really frightened the people who thought about it, “The Whole of Government” would be used to (in that case) combat Islamophobia. In Canada, the whole of government means teachers, nurses, anyone in public health, civil service, firemen, frankly a very large percentage of the working population of Canada, is under that sword of Damocles. You will be hurt if you exert effort to get out of that situation, but you will get equally hurt if you do nothing long enough. Just ask any violinist. That horse hair has a limited time before it breaks under the weight of the sword.

As a related aside, here is an article of ours from not too long ago on the fact that the Nazis were a far left wing movement, showing that the synergy and connections between Islam and the Nazis were as much a leftist-Islamic alliance as it is today.

 

Reader’s Links for Aug. 16, 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Stockwell Day does social media post about Covid and Vaxx damage

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

UPDATE: 

Please read the contents of this Tweet by Donald Best before reading this article. I think the article still has valid points in the meta, but it appears that Stockwell Day’s video has more authority than I was aware of.

Yes it’s early, but I am bewildered a little by this post.

For those that don’t know, and that is nearly everyone, Stockwell Day was the leader of the Canadian Alliance (the successor to the Reform Party) in the early 2000s.
Decades ago, when the old Progressive Conservative Party was pretty useless on issues of individual rights, the Reform Party under Preston Manning did very well and came within a seat or so of becoming the Official Opposition to the Liberal government.
In 1995 there was a by-election in Ottawa—Vanier (and further by-elections in 1996) that could have helped Reform overtake the Bloc Québécois for Official Opposition status. I remember this clearly because it was the only time in my life I went door-knocking for a political party.
The goal was to get the BQ out of Official Opposition.  In 2000 the Reform Party became the Canadian Alliance. Stockwell Day won the leadership contest that year and, after the November 2000 election, became Leader of the Official Opposition. (A separatist party that I have a lot more sympathy with today than I did then.)

I remember all this because it was the only time in my life I went door knocking for a political party. The idea was to get the BQ out of official opposition status, which is a position that affords some political power. Although to be fair, the BQ actually did a decent job as opposition, even on federal issues. Everyone had expected them to just winge about Quebec and French language and speakers rights, but they actually did a decent job.

This is also when I began to question what people think of as “democracy”. Canvasing in Vanier, a then French part of the city of Ottawa, got me a nearly uniform answer from every door that opened.

“My Gran-fader voted Liberal, my Fader voted Liberal, and I vote Liberal”.

It was as if I had asked them to support a different hockey team. None of them cared that an actual separatist party was the opposition and their vote for Reform could have set the federal project back on the rails. It was purely a matter of family tradition. And suddenly I understood, to a small degree, why a Constitutional Republic was the only hope for a free people.

In 2000, the Conservative Party merged with Reform creating the Canadian Alliance, and Stockwell Day won the leadership contest and became official Opposition leader that same year.

Ok that is enough about who Day is. Since then I have seen him appear very rarely on some issues. But recently he has popped up a couple of times. Here he is on the state’s Covid response:

People much more sophisticated than I on matters of Canadian politics tell me this is an important thing. This candid questioning of the blatant totalitarian measures may represent a milestone in the journey to truth and a restoration of liberty in Canada.

Our cynical suspicion is that it is, or will result in a steam kettle mitigation. This is a personal expression of ours. We see the state treating the public as if the state was a stovetop and the people a steam kettle. You create as much heat as you can under it, and when the pressure of the horrors the state is inflicting on the public gets so high the people might actually do something potentially effective, like the Freedom Convoy, they allow the kettle to whistle a little till the pressure goes back down to something which is no threat to the state agenda of the total deracination of Canada as it always had been.

We interviewed the doctor Day mentions in this Tweet back in 2023 as part of a series of doctors and scientists we interviewed back then. Dr. Hoffe was a serious scientist who had his own lab at home, which mysteriously burned down shortly after he went public with what damages he saw from the mRNA shots, who blew the whistle on the stunning percentage of serious injuries and deaths that his patients, and who happened to be Amer-Indians, which he treated.

The case of Dr. Hoffe tells us many things. One of which as a partial aside, is that the state, which calls itself the Government of Canada, does not give the 24 hours-post consumption end-product of a Beef Vindaloo about the Amer-Indian peoples of Canada, but does find them politically expedient quite often when the state wishes to launch a narrative attack against individual rights of all Canadians. When Hoffe came forward with the damages the shots did to Canadians, Amer-Indian or not, he was silenced using measures that are pretty clearly defacto totalitarian and thuggish along with all the machinations of ‘Cancel Culture’ that the communists used at that stage of the revolution. At that point, defying a state narrative was indeed punished harshly, but using extra-legal means like sending ANTIFA to hurt you in one way or another, destroying your professional reputation with media driven-whisper campaigns, mass media attacks on them and of course, they had achieved full institutional capture of the various colleges and professional organizations which held doctor’s your licence over their heads like a Sword of Damocles.

I hope my friends are right though. Stockwell Day’s strong statements may reflect a changing political climate or lead to real remedies.

Days’ statement in that Tweet at least reflect major components of the truth of the Communist Revolution which is usually referred to as T”he Covid Years”. And during which, MANY changes were enacted under the radar of transparent Parliamentary procedures. The Carney-Trudeau led state at that time passed the Canadian equivalent of executive orders, except they aren’t really supposed to have those powers, along with a Privy Council that is really just a stamp of approval, enacted a major expansion of the prohibited-firearms category, affecting large numbers of law-abiding Canadian gun owners, (That case is about to be taken to the Supreme Court by a self rep. We will have a lot more on that coming up)

  • May 2020 (early COVID): Order-in-Council banned ~1,500 “assault-style” firearms.
  • 2022: national freeze on handgun sales/transfers.

Other rights where altered, lessened or removed during this period, the details of which slip memory at the moment. But in any case, what is needed is a counter-revolution. What we might get, is a partial admission that some things where not done right, but it was understandable given the circumstances, (circumstance which of course, were 100% manufactured by the state itself) and maybe the state will print up bunch of money and give it to select victims such that the costs of covid and vaxx damage will be borne by the same people who are damaged by them. Inflation will make food more expensive for all Canadians, but the vaxx damaged might enjoy a new flatscreen TV.

In our opinion, a real remedy would be gutting the wealth of high level bureaucrats and politicians who it can be demonstrated, knew for a fact that the shots were unsafe, the lockdowns were not necessary, and all other measures were theatre like masks. The 1.4B$ that the CBC gets every year should be immediately stopped and high level executives at that network should be personally sued with full public disclosure for their role as propagandists instead of their fiduciary duty to actually oppose power and inform the public with at least 2 sides of the story. Which they not only did not do, but used their massive powers to ridicule, damage or ignore genuinely expert scientists who warned against all aspects of the measures deployed against the Canadian peoples at that time. And there were many of them.

And frankly, no solution that does not include a hard and fast law at the constitutional level guaranteeing the rights of Canadians to never have the state have this much power has any value at all. If the state can run roughshod over all of its people for as long as it wants, abusing the massive powers it has taken over the years, and then print a few bucks years later while being even better positioned to do it agin, it wasn’t a solution. It was part of the problem.

 

 

Reader’s links for Aug. 15, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Data points on Islamic and Leftist attacks on Western Civ, how to recognize them and how to get ahead of the tactics to see the strategy: Links 1 for August 14th, 2026

Posted on by — 10 Comments ↓

1. Muslims took a Viennese girl as a slave. This is the story, the justification and the reason it will get much much worse unless we the people decide to assert our own right to exist.

‘By Allah, I Will Kill You’: The Vienna Case and the Jihadist Model of Enslaving Non-Muslim Girls

2. Comedian, Ben Bankas gets a critical theory attack by the CBC.

Maybe the most important thing about this CBC critical theory attack on Bankas, Critical theory with more than a pinch of Discourse theory and mostly Habermas’ Repressive tolerance, is how they panned his act without seeing it.

In 1994, a book was released by a singularity brilliant and insightful man named Charles Murray, along with Richard J. Hernstein, the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology and who earlier served as chairman of Harvard’s Department of Psychology (1967–1971). I only heard of the book because it was reviewed everywhere in print, radio etc. The one thing all the reviews had in common was that the reviewers did not read it, and neither should anyone else.

I had never seen a review like that before. But it was intriguing. More than forbidden fruit, this heralded a new era in Canadian official culture where pressure was applied not to think or be exposed to certain thoughts. I can understand debating them, but this was new, and to me even back then, was an obscenity and a reason to hold Canada as a state in contempt.

So naturally I went out and got the book and read as much as I could of it. As much as I could because at a certain point, as the book itself predicted, it became too dense for my own ability to absorb the information. But from what I did read, it was extremely clear that the book was the opposite of what all the reviews claimed it was and why we shouldn’t read it. Yes, the book defied a critical and fundamental state narrative, but not the one or the way they said it did. Which has now become the norm for Canada. And Ben Bankas has become big enough and authoritative enough to get the same treatment as Charles Murray.

At this point for him to tour Canada is a genuine act of bravery and defiance. But then again, as Ezra reminds us, he did that all during Covid doing comedy shows in the park in Toronto while the fun police tried to shut him down.

Another women who didn

t go see him talked about Bankas as always punching down instead for up. As Ezra says, she means not making fun of Trump. But the reason the crowd likes Bankas so much in the clips she may be referring to, if she’s even seen them, are the jokes Bankas makes about those who actually DO have an unfair amount of power compared to everyone else because of a socialist government. And it’s the exact groups she names. Women, those allegedly born in the wrong bodies, (trans) Amer-Indians. The people who the law protects at the expense of the most fundamental rights like freedom of speech. That parents under C4 can be flipping jailed for trying to talk their own pre pubescent children out of being spayed or neutered! That IS punching up. What this woman means of course, is not engaging in the Orwellian 2 minutes of hate against Trump.

Another point to add to Ezra’s accurate observation about a joke about ‘Bad Bunny’. Had Bad Bunny been anyone, not even nearly as successful as he actually is, who had the same act but was counter-narrative then he would be attacked by the exact same CBC consensus-comedians for exploiting women etc. etc. In other words, all attacks on movies, comedians and entertainers in general are teleological in nature. In other words, the content is good or bad based on its effects to the state and state narratives. And that is the summary for the reviews on The Bell Curve, Ben Bankas and so on. It’s actually very simple and impossible to unsee once you get it. The one critic who talks about George Carlin proves both Ezra’a and my points. No one really laughs at carlin, they clap at his witty attacks on conservative (for the most part) people and principles.

One comment on YouTube under this video says it all:
@lsdave

The fact the CBC doesn’t allow commenting on any of their online videos is telling.

As they say, the best revenge is living well, and Bankas appears to be doing so.

If the Bell Curve is still available, I strongly recommend getting it, reading it, and hiding it somewhere in your walls very well. Fahrenheit 451 is not that far away in the Anglosphere. And maybe someday I will do my own review if I remember enough of it to justify doing it.

3. This is the reason that DEI was implemented. To create this. Never forget that.

4. Dr. Trozzi asks what is really a rhetorical question.

5. Here is a link to an Alex Berenson article which contains a letter to him from a college Prof. who responded to another article of Berenson’s about the youngest ever Ivy League prof. who made up his resume in an obvious way and DEI principles, if that is what you can call them, placed him in a rapid incline to authority for the opposite of reasons. We published a video about him some days ago when it briefly hit the news cycle. The article and letter are good of course. But this is important for all who think that under Trump the US is immune to all these Lines of Effort to destroy the country in every possible way by leftist policies like DEI.

6. This is too good and too important to wait for a new post.

This video showing how the study that shows that children raised by same sex couples have 4X the rate of emotional problems got buried, shows a singular methodology used by the Left to warp reality overall to achieve the predetermined outcome the narrative demands.

We may remember during Covid how everything got redefined in order to allow for outcomes the state wanted. One of the moments where my views on the mRNA experimental gene therapy shots moved to a state of crimson alert was when they redefined the word, vaccine, to accommodate something which meant none of its usual defining attributes in order to legally maneuver it as a vaccine. Watch this video with that in mind. Again, like much this site attempts. the idea is not to bring a single issue to your attention, but a methodology being used to control you and remove components of who you are overall. The methods are far more important than the individual targets. You can spend your life doing damage control for each Line of Action, like Gay Marriage (As a quasi-libertarian I believe people should be able to live however they want. But gay Marriage was an attack on marriage. Had it been about homosexual rights, a Civil Union would have solved those issues without being a clear and obvious dialectic on marriage itself) or Global arming etc. the real need is to understand the method so you can actually get ahead of it and recognize an attack when you see it coming rather than in the rearview and then head back and try and put out the fires.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Related: Here is the same woman doing a proper look at the real outcomes of Gay Marriage. Again, important in terms of understanding reality Vs. Narrative, but not dealing with the purpose of Gay Marriage as a dialectic attack on marriage as a whole.

For those who doubt this premise about the real purpose of Gay Marriage being an attack on Marriage itself, this talk by a notable Lesbian activist below should help settle it.

This is notable leftist activist, Masha Gessen.

Key lines from her remarks:

  • “It’s a no-brainer that we should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist.”
  • “Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we’re going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change… I don’t think it should exist.”

Reader’s Links for Aug. 14, 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Fauci knew and discussed it with political authority: This is more than science saying it was a bad idea

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

I’m sure everyone is aware of this by now. Bt it is not trivial. In the flood of real information and simultaneous target obscuring, disinformation that followed the release of the mRNA gene therapy shots, this is actually a shiny diamond in a giant and deliberately made great lake of propaganda mud. This is not something that can be dismissed by Hanlon’s Razor, which is the typical response of anyone still determined to maintain faith in a system which now works against individualism. This is proof of who knew what and when. This means that authorities were not wrong. They were lying. This matters. A lot.

Below, the CDC spokesman, Peter marks makes it clear that pregnant and breastfeeding women should get these shots.

This was released as an official communique from the CDC on May 19, 2022

Up to this point, pretty much everything was dismissible by a determined detractor. Political authorities flagrantly defying their own edicts was to our mind the proof they were lying. We saw that a lot. When the cameras were off, they would remove their masks and gather fat private parties, arranging restaurants to be opened for them and many more events like that. But detractors could dismiss it one way or another.

This is another matter though. This is them admitting they knew. The forced release of the Pfizer papers should have been enough. The massive amounts of post vaxx deaths should have been enough., After all they stopped the Swine flu vaccine, which was a regular vaccine, after I think 40 deaths. This was at least 2 orders of magnitude greater than that in mortality overall. (I will catch flak from both sides for that off the cuff estimate I know)

This was, as readers of this site know, in effect a communist revolution where reality and science are sidelined for arbitrary state diktats. But this might offer a chance to pull civilization out of the fire.

As an afterthought, this also puts the prosecution of Helen Grus into sharp relief. While it was already clear this was a political prosecution and not a breach of conduct one, anything but a complete dismissal of her case makes it clear what this is really about. Protecting a state narrative attack on the public.