Looking at the Alberta Referendum and Carney’s secret deal with the EU leaked?

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Comment by JU:

The engineered failure of Europe will be accelerated by the engineered failure of its energy supplies. EU climate management rules (aka Lysenko-like scientism) will continue to decarbonize (and deindustrialize) that continent into ultimate submission to the Comintern. Meanwhile, Mark Carney annexes Canada to Europe so to be the arbiter of valued Canadian natural resources, and subprime human capital, between continents. Brookfield Asset management, Carney’s company, will broker carbon credits to profit from the interstitial ideological lunacy these credits represent. Brookfield has also moved into the heat pump space promoted by Carney for all Canadian households. Heat pumps also occupy the interstitial space between modest effectiveness and freezing solid in the Canadian cold, the former being a lousy gamble even in air-conditioning mode.

Meanwhile, Red China very cleverly creates a conversion mechanism for its non-fungible currency, the Yuan, by creating a clearing house in Hong Kong through which it will launder Yuan for gold. This is mafia-style economics while wearing sovereign suits.

HIs comment contains links to two video. The salient bit of one of them is this Western Standard article about a leaked deal Carney made with the EU which at least on the surface may be some kind of deal to benefit Brookfield. But given that Carney states in his book that his role models are Marx, Engles and Lenin, and that he considers the problems of the West to be derived from ‘Capitalism’, an analysis that fits better would look more like anything that moves power away from the people of the region being ruled, and ideally to unknown, faceless all powerful bureaucrats as far away as possible so that the public actually have no chance of changing how things work in their day to day lives. Central planning don’t ya know. Canadian mineral and other natural resources will be planned and managed by the Communist EU and the CCP. And Canada will make scarcity very well. Which after all, is the only product that socialism always delivers on time.

From The Western Standard:

Canadians are being sold “associate membership” in the European Union without being told what it means or what Ottawa has already offered Brussels in the backrooms. A recent Nanos poll found significant support for the idea among Canadians. Were respondents shown the leaked document Ottawa drafted for discussions with Brussels, given a clear definition of associate membership, or reminded that Canada already has comprehensive trade and defence agreements with the EU? No. 

While Mark Carney tells Canadians and Albertans that Confederation rests on sovereignty, consultation, and strong provincial partners, the document his government sent to Brussels in September tells a different story: Ottawa is prepared to bargain away pieces of that sovereignty without consulting the people and provinces that hold it. Albertans who still believe the federation will protect their resources, their industries, and their constitutional powers may not have much time left to decide whether staying is worth the risk of closer EU alignment.

While Mark Carney tells Canadians and Albertans that Confederation rests on sovereignty, consultation, and strong provincial partners, the document his government sent to Brussels in September tells a different story: Ottawa is prepared to bargain away pieces of that sovereignty without consulting the people and provinces that hold it. Albertans who still believe the federation will protect their resources, their industries, and their constitutional powers may not have much time left to decide whether staying is worth the risk of closer EU alignment.

Lastly, while it is true that Alberta’s cities, Calgary and Edmonton, like all big cities now are far to the left of reality, (a luxury people who live far from the farms and factories that make all the stuff they consume can enjoy temporarily) one may still question how well Monday’s referendum was conducted. And the fact that they allowed mail in ballots, I believe half a million of them, may suggest a planned outcome by the provincial apparatus, since mail ins tend to always favour the collectivist options on any vote.

Asking BRAVE’s AI on the numbers: “519,082 special mail-in ballots were received and counted in Alberta’s October 19, 2026 referendum. This figure represented a tenfold increase compared to the 2023 provincial election and accounted for approximately 43% of the province’s eligible voters, who had already cast their votes before the main election day.”

I asked a follow up: ‘Is it known which way the mail ins were counted? For me at least, the answer raises an eyebrow. Actually high enough to catch in your hat.

There’s no official breakdown by voting method — Elections Alberta reports results by riding and by question, but not separately for mail-in vs. in-person ballots. The special ballots are counted at the same facility and reported alongside in-person ballots.

What is known is a striking participation pattern: mail-in voters were heavily concentrated on Question 10 (the separation question). As one analysis noted, “almost all the mail-in ballots appear to have only answered question 10.” The numbers back this up — Q10 drew roughly 1.9 million votes, while the other nine questions each had participation ranging from only 1 to 1.5 million. Since each question is on a separate ballot and voters can choose to answer any subset, many mail-in voters apparently marked only the separation ballot.

This disparity fueled online speculation of fraud (e.g., claims that Q10 had “38% more votes than actual eligible voters”), which Elections Alberta and analysts have dismissed. The explanation is that the special ballot option was newly unrestricted for the first time, and many of the 519,000+ mail-in voters were specifically motivated by the separation question rather than all ten issues.

As for the direction of mail-in votes on Q10 (remain vs. separate), that’s not publicly broken out. The overall result was ~75% remain / ~24% separate, but you can’t tell from the public data how that split looked among mail-in voters specifically.

We already know the Fed Guv has no ethics, morals or concerns about the law or constitution. Anyone who does not already know that, please go back to listening to CBC. You will find it much more comforting than this site. We know that The Rebel already busted some interference with the referendum for the remain side:

https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_fact_check_elections_alberta_confirms_lukaszuks_forever_canada_petition_was_always_a_referendum_campaign

https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_fact_check_is_thomas_lukaszuks_organization_operating_legally_during_a_referendum_campaign

Search Rebel News for more on Thomas Lukaszuk if you want.

So the patters reads:

Federal Government does the opposite of enforce border control and immigration laws.

Federal Government does the opposite of protect individual rights and has now passed a LOT of legislation which de jure actually makes the state the controller of the most fundamental of basic rights. Like bill C4, criminalizing parents if they try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered at the suggestion of a teacher or whatever other state agent.

Federal Government invoked the Emergency Measures Act, technically the renamed, War Measures Act (in retrospect one wonders if they did not rename it because they expected serious conflict to come from Canadians against the nascent communist state rather than external threats?) in order to quell the Freedom Convoy. An event which at least one brave federal Judge actually ruled was unconstitutional.

So its not much of a stretch to believe the same state government would interfere with a Provincial election where the main issue was the sovereignty of the people in Alberta, the most wealthy province in Canada since Newfoundland farmed out all the lobsters.

Weird about those mail ins only having time to mark question 10 isn’t it? It’s almost like there were far fewer voters than ballots or something.

Reader’s Links for Oct. 21 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

New book club at Carlton features work on Jihad by the Ayatollah Khomeini, Trans-refugees to Holland get bitter pill and Eric Zemmour calls it as it is: Links 1 for Oct. 20, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. Eric Zemmour is in a rare class along with Geert Wilders. Someone who is not Muslim, and manages to speak the truth about Islam and related issues publicly and still has a pulse.

2. Probably most people don’t remember Bruce Bawer. He was a very early example of an American leftist who decided that as a gay man in New York, he was sick of the racism and persecution he faced in America because of his sexual orientation. So he decided to move to the Netherlands, where he imagined life would be paradisiacal for homosexuals. Subsequently he wrote an exceptional book called, While Europe Slept about how in fact Islamic immigration had made things so much worse for gay men than in the US that he had to leave the Netherlands after a few severe beatings. He also went on to reevaluate how he viewed the US as a culture altogether and started touring, speaking about how in Fact, the US was the only culture that made any sense from a more or less libertarian perspective. This book was published on Sept. 11, 2007. And unfortunately, what might be called the sexual-orientation branch of the military colonists spearheading that component of the communist revolution did not get the memo. In fact Bruce was shunned from the organized branches of that component of the intersectional alliance against “capitalism”.

yesterday, Gates of Vienna published a very interesting account of another American, a ‘trans’ person from San Francisco, who, if you can believe it, decided to declare “refugee status” in the Netherlands. You can guess how it went, but it’s a short and excellent read. Please click through.

For those interested, this is Bruce Bawer’s talk in Ottawa from 2009. back then, YouTube had a 15 minute limit for videos so it was initially done in 4 parts but we put it back together as one video here now.

3. Carleton University has authorized a new book club, and tonight’s reading is of a book by the Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the Islamic revolution that turned a thriving and happy Persia back to a near Medieval Islamic Iran back in the 70s. And one thing we can say about the Ayatollah, is he is very honest about Islam. In tonight’s book club reading they have chosen his book, The Greatest Jihad.

Now many people who have had a brief look at the concept of Jihad likely think it’s about an inner struggle for self betterment. Well… that’s kinda true. But what constitutes self betterment in Islam is of course, the Islamic concept of better. Which is not the Western one.

People who look a little deeper may find that there are two forms of Jihad, The greater, which is the self betterment kind, and the lesser, which is waging war on the unbeliever till all the world is for Allah and Islam is all there is for religious devotion.

In the book, Jihad al Akbar, The Greatest Jihad, the Ayatollah actually explains what the Greater Jihad actually means. Or more precisely what self improvement means in Islam:

With love of self and position, with arrogance and pride, you cannot mount any resistance. An evil scholar, a scholar who inclines toward the world, a scholar who thinks of preserving his position and administrative post, will not be able to combat the enemies of Islam. He will be more harmful than others. Take a step for the sake of God. Dispel the love of the world from your heart. Then you will be able to engage in combat.

From this moment on, develop and raise this point in your heart, that I must be an armed soldier of Islam, and sacrifice myself for Islam. I must work for Islam until I am destroyed. Do not make excuse for yourself that today is inappropriate. Try to be useful for the future of Islam. In short, become a human being! The colonialists are afraid of human beings. They are afraid of man. The colonialists, who want to plunder all we have, will not allow the training of human beings in religious and scholarly universities.

OK so now we know. The Greater Jihad means to become more authentically Muslim. To lose your love of the world and prepare yourself to die fighting the lesser jihad, killing infidels. Finally this all makes sense. As I say, nothing more useful than an honest Muslim leader. We felt pretty much the same way about Anjem Chaudary.

Then there are Khomeini’s speeches and writings from the 1940s where he was pretty clear about his views, which are ones the naive or those not paying attention would imagine the left might oppose.

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of other countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world.”
This is one that should resonate with Islam’s useful idiots in the West:
“Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those who say this are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by the unbelievers? Islam says: Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter their armies. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender [to the enemy]? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to paradise, which can be opened only for holy warriors! There are hundreds of other Koranic psalms and hadiths urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”

Both from his book Kashf al-Asrar (Unveiling of Secrets), written in 1942

It would be interesting to know what kind of clubs have been refused by Carleton U. Maybe none. But I bet anti-Abortionists are not allowed on campus at all, let alone to start a pro-life club there.

Actually yeah. Predictably, there is quite a record of selective denial of club status:

Well-documented case involving a pro-life club at Carleton University in Ottawa.

The group was Carleton Lifeline. The Carleton University Students’ Association (CUSA) repeatedly restricted or denied it official club status because of its anti-abortion stance.? From the National post

2006: CUSA passed a policy stating that no resources, space, recognition, or funding would be allocated for activities seeking to “limit or remove a woman’s right to choose.” This effectively barred pro-life groups from official club status. Carleton Lifeline was targeted.? From CBC

2010: After members set up a graphic Genocide Awareness Project display (comparing abortion to the Holocaust and other atrocities), several students were arrested for trespassing. Campus security and Ottawa police intervened when the group refused to confine the display to a designated indoor area. Shortly afterward, CUSA decertified Carleton Lifeline. The association said the club’s constitution (which described abortion as a “moral and legal wrong” and called for legal protection of the unborn) violated its anti-discrimination policy. Lifeline was told it could regain status only by amending its constitution to affirm a woman’s right to choose.? National Post

CUSA upheld the decision. The club pursued legal options, including a lawsuit against the university administration (alleging discrimination and unequal treatment of displays) and a judicial review of the student association’s actions.? From Lifesite news
By around 2012–2013, CUSA revised its policy and Carleton Lifeline was later re-certified as a club.?
The university administration was not always identical in position to CUSA. In the 2006 episode, for example, the university stated it was not bound by the student association’s decision and would still allow groups to book space under existing policies (with possible restrictions on graphic images handled case-by-case).?

These events were widely covered at the time by outlets including the National Post, Globe and Mail, CBC, Maclean’s, and LifeSiteNews, and they sparked broader debate in Canada about free speech and student-union policies on campus. No equally prominent recent (post-2013) denials of pro-life or similar clubs at Carleton appear in the main reporting.

So that all makes sense. And is perfectly consistent with the new revolutionary Canada.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

Reader’s Links for Oct. 20th, 2026

Posted on by — 8 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Demands for sharia sent to schools in Scotland, Ireland and elsewhere attached to bomb threats

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Canada seems to be implementing UK style thought police: Interview with Tanya Gaw

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Article at RIAR Foundation

The actual police at the door recording:

Pro-Communist demo in Montreal Oct. 18, 2027 by Brazilian Latte communists

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Reader’s Links, Oct. 19, 2026

Posted on by — 11 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Getting it wrong on France, Spain and elsewhere – Who is really to blame?

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

First, let’s look at some material from Ottawa’s Freedom Convoy of 2022. A couple of things to take note of. They had street cleaning patrols. The streets were cleaner during the Freedom Convoy than the rest of the year before and after the Convoy.
Also crime went DOWN. Several Canadian military Veterans patrolled the Cenotaph at police request as well as the War Memorial on Elgin 24/7 to see that it was kept safe and clean. For this, some like Jeff Evely, where actually arrested, tried, and banned from entering Ottawa for quite a while.

Here is a HEAVILY sanitized CBC propaganda clip on the wierd, anonymized police used to attack the Freedom Convoy using the now officially illegal and unconstitutional Emergency Measures act:

CBC lies like a rug on this of course, making claims about Children used as human shields while actual live footage at the time showed nothing of the sort. Also CBC doesn’t show police pulling people out of trucks and beating them and leaving them cuffed in horrible positions in the -30C weather for extended periods.

Here is a little footage of the militarized anonymized police attack on the protestors on Feb. 18, 2022

There is aa lot more footage of the police abuse of peaceful protestors from that day. If you search YouTube or X though, you get enemy propaganda clips from CBC, CTV and Global with framing that is the opposite of what actually took place. Which should be no surprise to anyone who finds themselves reading this site.

So what does this have to do with France today? I mean, France and Canada, they are different countries. Right?

No. They aren’t. The West for the most part is under one supranational and transnational set of diktats. From the UN, the EU, and the WEF as well as the Fabians and other orgs we haven’t heard of. The Known unknowns. And really, what did they do at those Bilderberg meetings?

The plan is the same for all these countries, including the United States, although Trump put a brake on aspects of the planned demolition of the West by re-taking the borders. Which explains why there was I think, 5 or 6 attempts to murder him that we know of so far. He is a genuine obstacle to the new COMINTERN plot to destroy the West.

Police smashing windows and dragging people out of the trucks

Amer-Indian woman being trampled by police horses 

Some footage of the initial contact between massive amounts of anonymized state thugs and the peaceful, tidy and lawful protestors on Wellington St.

Now compare that to the total lack of response by the French state to these profoundly destructive revolutionary riots, largely by people who have no actual justification even for being in France in the De Jure sense. De facto, the state brought them in, and the state knew with certainty that they would do this exact thing. Remember when Notre Dame was burned down? It was an early narrative much like Covid. The ancient Oak beams used in the ceiling of the Cathedral apparently caught fire from a cigarette from a worker doing renovations. Only we spoke to a number of carpenters and contractors, all of which said that the older the oak, the harder it is to light and centuries old oak would need actual thermite to get it lit.

In fact here is a demonstration of just how hard it is to light old oak beams. The older, the more fire resistant it is.

France also banned or destroyed stockpiles of Hydroxychloroquine when in vivo use showed it would save people’s lives who had 1st gen Covid. They lied about the fire at Notre Dame. They utterly and completely failed to send an appropriate response to the revolution taking place on the streets this past week or more, and in contrast, Canada sent a response that was orders of magnitude greater than the situation called for in 2022. And why? Because those were legacy Canadians demanding the rights they had before the communist revolutionaries who actually run things now took over. And to make the revolution complete, they need to import millions who hate us and feel entitled to everything that we built, and at a certain point, let them or make them assert their dominance.

Covid, Notre Dame, the mRNA mandatory injections along with lockdowns and masks, Islamophobia narratives, Global Warming and an easy ten or more mass line narrative attacks used to destroy Western Civilization are nearing the end of their usefulness. Or better stated, they won’t need those kind of narratives anymore. In France and in Spain, its open street warfare by imported young male mostly Muslim migrants against an aging (thanks to feminism and leftist anti-family narrative attacks) and unarmed population. Also thanks to leftist narratives that the public should not be armed.

Last night there was this:

The four Olds of Mao: old ideas, old culture, old customs, and old habits

These are clearly under attack.

Here is Grok’s analysis of the way Churches were described in Orwell’s 1984:

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the old churches of London no longer serve any religious purpose. Organized religion has effectively disappeared under the Party, and the surviving church buildings have been either ruined or repurposed.?Online.flipbuilder

The clearest references come in Book One, Chapter 8, when Winston visits Mr. Charrington’s junk shop and sees an engraving of what he recognizes as a building near the Law Courts:

St. Clement’s Danes was bombed years earlier and is now a ruin. Winston had not known it had once been a church.
Mr. Charrington tells him, “There’s a lot of them left, really… though they’ve been put to other uses.”
St. Martin’s-in-the-Fields (still standing in Victory Square, the former Trafalgar Square) has been turned into a museum for propaganda displays—scale models of rocket bombs and Floating Fortresses, waxwork tableaux of enemy atrocities, and similar exhibits.?Rvb
Winston has never heard church bells ring in his lifetime. The old children’s rhyme beginning “Oranges and lemons, say the bells of St. Clement’s…” survives only as a half-remembered fragment among the elderly proles, evoking a lost London whose steeples are now “ghostly” and silent.

Later in the novel, Winston and Julia also meet in the belfry of a ruined church in the countryside, another example of these buildings existing only as empty shells of the past.

In short, the Party has erased the churches’ original function. What remains are ruins, state museums for war propaganda, or other non-religious uses, while the history of the buildings themselves has been obscured or rewritten so that the pre-revolutionary past cannot be reliably recovered from them.

We are watching the communist destruction of the West at end game. For now, the Churches will be replaced with mosques. Communists likely imagine that the Mosques are a temporary tactic to destroy Christianity and Judaism/Jews, and then the revolution will destroy them as well. but it won’t work out that way. The dialectical con of making people forget who they are, and stop defending themselves and resort to tribalism and attack each other over every conceivable issue, real or imagined, worked against Western people very well. We tribalized over every issue to the point that people will support politicians over only one issue like abortion, while letting everything else go right to hell. The Muslims don’t do that. They vote in blocks for one thing only. The advancement of Islam and Sharia. And even some of the more enlightened people do not yet understand or care about the threat this represents.

Main stream media is not covering the end of France, or even if it is just unprecedented rioting and destruction, at most it gets an en passant reference as “students upset about insufficient funding” or other narrative mass lines. But those watching on social media still do not get it. They lament, “Oh why did they let those immigrants in! Look at what they are doing! The French state is so stupid!”

Nope.

The French state bought them in to do exactly what they are doing. It’s a bitter pill to swallow. If you like, it is Hanlon’s Razor at scale. This is the public insisting to themselves that it is incompetence when it is indeed malice. Everything points to it going back to every leftist narrative that has been destructive to Western culture, civilization and nations. From Feminism to acid rain to global warming to making abortion a sacrament, gay marriage, the trans-narrative, right up to the Gaza ‘genocide’ each of which is to split the Western legacy population and culture into tribes and have us war with each other while Muslims, united in their doctrinal and violent hatred of all that is not ruled by sharia, gain dominance,.

[necessary addendum] We do not oppose homosexuals living under any arrangement they want. We believe in personal liberty. However marriage meant something specific and was for the betterment of the family. Something gay people cannot make, (or at least not by accident.) Civil Unions would have been a real solution to a minor-problem. But instead they chose to make the solution one which would deconstruct a central pillar of Western civilization. Redefining marriage to mean 2 men or 2 women, which then meant that marriage means nothing at all and now, depending on where, can mean whatever people want it to mean, so it means nothing and fewer and fewer people will commit to it. Especially men since, well frankly it is insane given the power imbalance to women today. So the issue is not removing rights from homosexuals, It is not using homosexual arrangements as a wrecking ball against the pillars of civilization.

Reader’s Links. Oct 18, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

About Rubio’s Greek Speak, Turley on the coming kinetic war in the US, life in jail for jihad means a few years and parole and France is still enjoying a communist/Islamic revolution: Links 1 for October 17, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

About yesterday’s announcement of the Tesla supercar… this is too funny not to post. Porche launched a new model on the same day. It didn’t look good

1. On October 7th, Sec. State Rubio gave a stirring speech in Athens on the importance of Western Civilization, its origins and threats it now faces. Diana West wrote this article pointing out the two rather considerable omissions in that speech.

2. Constitutional Lawyer, Jonathan Turley: “You Better Get Ready for … War”: Socialists Call for “War in the Streets” and the End of Capitalism

“You better get ready for … war.” Across the country, radicals are openly planning for the next stage of their movement, and notably, the Democratic establishment is not part of their plans. Despite the talk of a “Big Tent Party,” socialists are riding high on a surge of support and talking purges and revolution.

In Chicago, radicals gathered for a conference on Marxism during what many view as the heyday of socialism in the United States. The Democratic Socialists of America is now larger and more powerful than at any time in our history. Socialist candidates are winning elections across the country as Democratic establishment figures from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) to Gov. Gavin Newsom pander to the movement.

Speakers in Chicago used the conference to push supporters to the next stage in the movement, including some openly calling for violence and the end to capitalism.

University of California Santa Barbara History Professor Butch Ware said Democrats “must be destroyed” and urged attendees to be ready for “war in the streets.” Notably, in postings on X, Ware has said that candidates such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed are too restrained and are being pushed by the establishment “to contain radicalism.”

The professor “of Africa and Islam” whose faculty page is appropriately found under “bware” is the latest radical to dismiss the “Big Tent Party” rhetoric of establishment figures like Schumer. He declared, “The Democrats cannot be reasoned with. They must be destroyed.” There is little subtlety in the message, Ware has explained: “You cannot call yourself a revolutionary and not be talking about training with weapons.”

It is another example of the delusion that establishment Democrats have that they will be able to use these radicals to destroy their political enemies but not themselves.

3. Toronto 18 jihadi terror boss granted full parole

The Parole Board of Canada says the would-be terrorist who planned to bomb CSIS no longer shows signs of extremism

A ringleader of the failed Toronto 18 terror plot has been granted full parole after the Parole Board of Canada concluded he no longer shows “any signs of holding onto extremist beliefs or radical ideologies.”

Zakaria Amara helped recruit members of a group that planned to storm Parliament Hill and bomb several places across Toronto. He’s been on day parole with multiple conditions for the past four years, and the board moved his release forward after they reviewed his case last week.

The two-member panel says Amara, 41, demonstrated “positive change, both in attitude and behaviour” after taking a deradicalization process while he was in jail. The panel’s decision, which included redactions, says Amara wants to live in his own home, work a full-time job, attend a mosque, see family and participate in “appropriate leisure activities.”

It gets depressing to have to say these things. But saying he shows no signs of extremism means they don’t even stop to think for a second, “extremism of what exactly?” Also that he just wants to go to a mosque. There is not a single mosque that does not preach from Koran and Hadiths that demand total global Islamic manifest destiny. The prayer against Jews and Christians, Koran 1:7, is repeated at least 7 times a day in every mosque. Read the article linked above to the Sun. Life in Prison for a mass casualty plan now means a few years inside and then parole to go back to the same ideology that put you there. Until people realize that Islam is the problem, and this is so easily demonstrated by its history, its canonical teachings, modern events taking place across the non-Islamic world and sermons within mosques world wide, not to mention published documents by the most authoritative Muslims in the world such as Tantawi, we don’t stand a chance.

“The problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam”. -Sam Harris.

4. I don’t think the importance of this can be overstated. Not only have national borders been utterly negated, they have been reversed. Our state, not our government in any usual sense but Carney, the EU, China and the WEF etc. which are the true rulers of Canadians and creators of policy, have reversed the borders and are actively bringing in millions of unvetted migrants from parts of the world who have radically different values than classical Canada does. The seeming hypocrisy is so large it can’t be properly described to those who choose not to look without those who are simply stating facts in evidence seeming to be complete lunatics or ‘conspiracy nuts’. This is the demoralization Yuri Bezmenov speaks about of course.

5. Is Hollywood pivoting away from Global Warming back to Nuclear Winter, or at least a variant of it? One may think so, especially as they use gay and authoritative black people to explain it to us. Is this just a random disaster movie plot? or a new mass line narrative attack/active measure. It would be interesting to watch people deeply committed to Anthropogenic Global Warming pivot back to Nuclear winter if we hadn’t already seen it happen from Nuclear Winter to Global warming. Maybe once they clear the snow off their solar panels and save up enough trickle power to watch TV they may change narratives. The one thing that is true though, is that colder temperatures, even by a couple of degrees, means real disaster. Mass starvation and death. If Global Warming was real, that would actually create better conditions for life on Earth.

6. Here is an hour and change of recent footage of the communist-Islamic revolution in France. May as well call it what it is or it makes no sense at all. RAIR details it here.

Geert Wilders offers this:

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Reader’s Links for Oct.17 2026

Posted on by — 8 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

UK at end game, border guard leaks: Links 1 for Oct. 16, 2026

Posted on by — 6 Comments ↓

1. Worthy podcast by Raymond Ibrahim. In this 80 minute podcast, Raymond actually goes in to a lot of the detail about Islamic beliefs which are important to know for those who actually are trying to understand it for the purposes of debate or any other. There are certain islamic ubiquitously used deceptions Muslims use when trying to convince or assuage peoples fears about Islam which are addressed here. For example, Muslims often say they worship Jesus as well. But of course it’s a totally rewritten Jesus for Islamic purposes, and bears no relation to the Christian or Biblical Jesus. But he explains in detail that according to islamic eschatology, when Jesus returns he comes to abrogate one of the three choices Islam gives to the unbeliever nations and states. Namely convert, pay the Jizya tax in a humiliating way, or die in jihad wars. When Jesus returns, the Jizya options are abrogated and Christians are faced with convert or die.

2. The UK is at endgame.

3. People know about this I’m sure, and opinions about it are 100% predictable. Canadians and others with TDS will pretend that this was only done for political revenge or some other purpose by Trump despite the fact the investigation started under Biden. Those of us that have followed her and the rest of the DemocRAT pack already knew much of her criminal activities, and I bet there are billions in money laundering and fraud via the Somali community in her state.

But this is a bit of fun ‘related’ news.

4. This talk is very important for two reasons. The first is because its both a nearly accurate description of what happened in Iran and what is happening now in Canada, across the West and very possibly even in the US, and secondly because the use of the word, “Islamism” or “Islamists” instead of Islam or Muslims moves the muzzle away from the target just enough to not actually do any good.

Actually this brings me to a second related point. The first being that there is no such thing as Islamism, Islamists or other variations that may exist which create the illusion that there is some narrow warped type of Islam that is responsible for jihad. This notion is created by a second fallacy, that Islam is in need of some kind of reformation, invoking the misunderstanding of the Protestant reformation.

The protestant reformation was the idea that the Catholic Church had strayed from its original purpose and teachings and had become corrupt. I don’t think that is much in dispute since Jesus never sold indulgences as far as I know. But the Muslims did in fact have a reformation. It was the Muslim Brotherhood. The MB DID reform Islam back to its roots in exactly the way Martin Luther did to Christianity. The difference is just that Islam is authentically an ideology of violent global manifest destiny. After WW1, Islam was somewhat domesticated. But the Ikwan (Muslim Brotherhood) returned it to its authentic and original doctrinal canon and teachings.

When you speak as this woman does, and one who at least appears to be too young to remember the Iranian revolution, started by communists and finished by Muslims, and use terms that perpetuate the myth of “Islamic Extremists” you work for the enemy whether you know it or not.

5. Here are a couple of related posts to #4.

Daniel Greenfield: Manhattan Jewish Anti-Israel Activists Try a ‘Two-State Solution’ with Hamas supporters on Oct 7

Here we see how the Islamic factor in the communist revolution is actually racing past the end game to enforce antisemitism against even Jewish useful idiots who stand with the communists. And leaping ahead here, my guess is those Jewish useful idiots will not learn from this experience. Any Jewish leftist that didn’t figure out at least the Islamic part of the equation after Oct. 7, 2026 will not ever get it. They are more loyal to their ideology than to change it based on personal consequences of them.

A group of liberal Jews opposed to Israel had invited Zohran Mamdani to an Oct 7 vigil. The vigil was supposed to show why Israel’s war on Hamas was cruel, senseless and wrong.

Instead, the vigil became an object lesson in why Israel exists and why it must fight.

Israelis for Peace, whose logo is a dove in flight, had booed marchers at Israel’s parade in New York City, and gathered at Union Square not long after the attacks to protest Israel’s military campaign against Hamas while brandishing signs like “How Many Children Is It Okay to Kill”.

By joining the small group’s vigil, Mamdani had hoped to defuse claims of antisemitism and to boost the reputation of the handful of anti-Israel activists who, contrary to the group’s name, included veteran non-Israeli activists like Rachel Timoner: best known as Schumer’s ‘rabbi’.

When Mamdani showed up, he was surrounded by more extremist clergy, including Jill Jacobs, a longtime activist who leads the T’ruah anti-Israel group, Sharon Kleinbaum, the co-founder of New York Jewish Agenda with Timoner, once accused of reciting prayers for Hamas terrorists, and Ellen Lippmann, an activist in a series of radical anti-Israel groups including T’ruah, J Street and Jews for Racial and Economic Justice. None of them were actually ‘Israelis’.

Please read the rest at the source. It will flesh out the Iranian revolution in important ways. Also this Prof. Jonathon Turley article about how the US left is now openly calling for violent revolution to overthrow “capitalism” and Democrats. Worth the read. For Canadians, it is worth asking oneself what would happen if any non-Communist wrote an article asking non-communists or non-Muslims to even just prepare themselves for violent revolution with a potentially violent response. It would certainly be reframed for your court case into something else. Related to all this, is this interview with a Spanish Border guard whistle blower. He explains how the Spanish state and media is part and parcel of the invasion of Spain by the Moroccan military along with what Daniel Greenfield in many articles calls, “Military Colonists”.

Military Colonists are what you see now at many hotel chains across the West, as our government now is bringing in uncounted thousands of military age men mixed with trained military personnel for a purpose people simply cannot let themselves believe.

Here is a partner article to the Spanish Whistleblower linked above. This one from Manchester UK:

Here are 6 of the 21 questions. The whole interview can be read at the source link.

COMPLETE INTERVIEW — ALL 21 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Q1: Thank you for agreeing to meet with me. Please tell me a little bit about yourself.

A: I hold a position within Border Control based at Manchester Airport. We report to a Regional Director, who then reports directly to the Director General of Border Control and Immigration, who then of course reports directly to the Home Secretary.

Q2: How long have you been with Border Control?

A: I have been with Border Control for twenty?one years, which includes service with Customs as well. I have worked at various locations, but I have been based at Manchester Airport for the last six years.

Q3: You’ve been with Border Control for a long time — tell me a little bit about the role that you undertake.

A: We have a quite diverse operation. This includes Immigration — checking that those who come into our country are legally allowed to be here, and checking their visa status. But we also look at packages and carry out Customs checks on all items. We look for any unusual shipments — ranging from contraband, Class A drugs, to weapons. In fact, we look for anything that should not be legally brought into the UK.

Q4: It sounds like quite a diverse and exciting role.

A: Well, not really. It becomes more of a standard job — you go to work, you come home, you relax, and you go back to work again. It sounds exciting, but it’s not — because a lot of it is process?driven, and in the main it can be quite mundane. However, what does get complicated is the way that we report our findings through to senior management. We have had a lot of issues in the past, and I believe that Manchester Airport is one of the most poor?performing airports in the UK — long queues, slow processing — simply down to lack of personnel and management structure.

Q5: I understand. So tell me — why have you approached us with information you feel is important for the public to hear?

A: I’ve come to you because I’ve watched your work over the last four or five years. Often you just don’t know who to trust. However, watching what you do — and seeing the information you put in the public domain — it’s clear that you have an understanding, honesty, and respect for what is right and wrong, morally and ethically, in our country. I find it difficult to understand how the mainstream media doesn’t pick this up — and it’s left to people like you to try and give it publicity. I do not trust any mainstream media outlets — including GB News.

Q6: So tell me — why don’t you trust the mainstream media?

A: Quite clearly, they have an agenda. They push a political narrative which is promoted by the Government. You have to be a fool not to see that clearly. But also — the likes of GB News pick up stories, and I would call them “fake patriots” — people who have their own agenda, often for financial gain or worse — they could just be a mouthpiece for the Government. That’s why it’s difficult to trust even the so?called alternative media. A lot of my colleagues just laugh about it — watching the news report almost unilaterally pushing one single message. And what really irritates me most is those people who call themselves “patriots” — who clearly demonstrate they haven’t got a clue — apart from how to fill their own pockets.

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Elon Musk is either an alien, or he is getting large incremental tech from them.

Seriously though, this is the same tech he uses to make his rocket stages land on ships the right way up at the next level. Very freaking cool.

Reader’s Links, Oct 16, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.