THIS WAS OUR BERLIN MOMENT

Posted on by — Leave a reply

THE BC PROVINCIAL ELECTION OF 2026

This is a guest post by BC author, Tim Murray with thanks!

Screenshot

Above: On November 10th of 1989 East and West Berliners picked up hammers and chisels to tear down the symbol of Communist tyranny and failed  socialist economics.  After Ronald Reagan famously implored “Mr. Gorbachev” to “take down that wall”, impatient  Berliners decided to do it themselves. It had  divided them for 28 years and they were tired of waiting for divine intervention.  Well British Columbians grew  tired of waiting too. They seized the opportunity that a cynical opportunist afforded them by calling an unnecessary snap election and they took a wrecking ball to an incorrigibly doctrinaire regime  intent on doubling down on its  disastrous policies.

Arguably the most incompetent and tyrannical government in Canadian history was toppled by BC voters on October 24th 2026 . I was one of them. Now I know how Berliners felt 37 years ago when they used sledgehammers to break down the wall. It is the same feeling that American marines and sailors felt when they saw the stars and stripes appear on the top of Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima. The same feeling I had when I saw TV images of the Freedom Convoy pass by ordinary Canadians of all hues who braved freezing temperatures to cheer them on, some hanging maple leaf flags from highway overpasses.

These are the moments and images that one never forgets.

You hold onto them because they remind you that when things look hopeless and you are on the brink of giving up on the human race, there are people out there who think independently and have not succumbed to scaremongering, indoctrination and mass psychosis. These brave hearts are not content to be passive bystanders. They are prepared to act on their beliefs and push back in the face of intimidation and vilification. On October 24th B.C. voters used the ballot box to do the pushing.

History informs me that it is unwise to invest all of your hopes in politicians or believe that a new government will solve all of the problems that a defeated one left us. For most of us, this was not so much a vote for the opposition party but a renunciation of a manifestly bad one. As Churchill observed, if there is not a political party worth voting for, there is always one worth voting against. And David Eby gave us so much to vote against: Historically unprecedented debt and deficit levels, rising debt servicing costs that exceed the costs of all but two ministries, secret treaties with aboriginal tribes that threaten property rights, harm reduction policies that fueled an opioid crisis, ideologically driven education policies that are more concerned with allowing children to transition than to learn how to read and write, human rights tribunals that resemble kangaroo courts which make outrageous rulings, a strangulating bureaucracy that crushed free enterprise, the obstruction of Alberta’s exports of oil and natural gas and all the insanity financed with ever rising taxes….the list goes on.

On October 24th the majority of BC voters decided to flush the toilet. Done.

Tim Murray

October 25, 2026

Reader’s Links for Oct. 26th, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Reader’s Links for Oct. 25th, 2026

Posted on by — 21 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

5 items and an explanation of how this site views events: Links post 1 for Oct. 24, 2026

Posted on by — 5 Comments ↓

1. Pretty much all Western nations, and this includes the United States depending on where exactly, is at one or another stage of the following process. The disassembly of rule of law, and its replacement with a dialectically driven state. And by rule of law, I mean fundamentals. Like equality before the law. And while that was never fully achieved, it was to the extent that most people enjoyed the fruition of their efforts and a reasonable expectation of justice for wrongs committed against them, even by the state. That individuals had rights that would stand up in court, and mostly, (and many highly sleepy people and even lawyers still believe this one) “The truth is always an absolute defence”. I remember a lawyer I knew insisting that was still the case in 2023 after 3 years of people being persecuted and prosecuted for telling the truth about Covid, the vaccines or the origins of the virus.

By a dialectical state, I mean one driven by state created narratives, hammered down to the public via Maoist mass lines, each one of which was made for the same purpose. To convince people to sacrifice their individual rights and move political power upwards to an increasingly distant and unaccountable state. And increasingly, that the only real crime is opposing a state narrative. Especially with facts and evidence, and exponentially so from a position of recognized authority. Like a doctor, lawyer, politician, or influential social media person.

Initially, Cancel culture was used as the defacto punishment. Professional bodies like colleges of physicians were used to destroy someone who dared suggest the state narrative was inaccurate or dangerous to the public. People would be accused of being racist or some other term which made them untouchable in their social and professional circles. This did not need to be something that saw the inside of a court. Like Islamic accusations of blasphemy, the entire process takes place via mob mentality. The truth of the claim has the opposite of importance, and the procedure for determining guilt is the accusation alone. It would attach a smell to the person that others could not afford to have in their orbit. Racism being one of the prime examples, even when it is used ludicrously far from its proper meaning. Like Islamophobia for dislike or opposition to a voluntary belief system, or homophobia, being opposition to special status for people who prefer some sexual practices over others. (I’ll accept some latitude in the definition of the latter. There will be objections and some of them are valid)

Slowly this process worked its way up the chain from defacto to de Jure. Arguably, but I would easily accept correction on this, it became a matter of law and courts when people started to broadcast the obvious facts around the jihad attack of many young girls at a Taylor Swift dance party. The narrative was it was an English Choir boy, while in reality it was a Muslim jihadi with a room full of Islamic State propaganda. People who pointed out the actual nature of the crime fit jihad perfectly rather than the typical behaviour of a Catholic or CoE Choir boy, were arrested and jailed. Sometimes for over a year. And that looked like the shift from a cancel culture off-the-record enforcement of state narrative, to one where the organs of state began to enforce them officially.

Canada has passed the legislation to do this. However its enforcement is nascent. We saw a leading edge example of this when police visited Tanya Gaw over a social media post in British Columbia this spring.

Being as generous as I can to the state, the police somewhat apologetically explained that they had a complaint and so they had to investigate. Sounds reasonable on the surface. But if I make a complaint to the police that my neighbour is enjoying the sunshine in her back yard, there would be no investigation unless there is some law saying you cannot enjoy the sunshine in your back yard.

(Mind you as I typed that last bit I had to stop and struggle to find a ludicrous example, as every one I thought of is probably illegal in some way. Even that one if the back yard person isn’t dressed appropriately etc etc.)

Canada has passed several laws that make counter narrative opinions illegal and are planning more. Bill C4 that criminalizes parents, fines and potentially jails them, and removes their children if they try and suggest they should not be spayed and neutered in the name of “trans-affirming-Care” till they are old enough to buy cigarettes is such a large example most don’t believe it even if you show it to them in black and white. Several people have suggested Climate Denialism and mass Indian graves at residential school denialism should be a criminal offence. And already people are being defacto punished for it with the same above mentioned methods. Loss of professional standing etc. Being reviled by legacy enemy propaganda media and so on. Probably we can blame that on the criminalization of Holocaust denialism. All efforts to do that typically just create the Streisand effect but hand the state the power to determine what can be said. And that itself is a crime against humanity. People will believe what they want about historical events. Legislating what they have to believe wont change that, but will create tyranny.

And it is with this in mind that one should read this site and look at these events. We are not looking for rage bait. We think that is counter productive for reasons stated at the end of this post.

We are looking for data and a model which we can use to understand what is happening to us, and to stop it, and reverse it. And if not reverse it, move forward to a new truth-based individualist society with equal opportunity and inequality of result. Because at the end of the day, being the author of one’s own story is the greatest freedom man has ever known. And because what constitutes inequality of result rests more on the tool you use to measure it, than the actual value of the result. As free people, we value different things, and pursue different things. And to force all of humanity to value the same thing the same way is tyranny. Communism and Islam are perfect examples.

2. For those of you who like this site and feel it has something to offer you, please consider subscribing to Daniel Greenfield’s site. He has been a purveyor of insight and reason on Islam and the left for many a year. In this article he explains why the ‘Palestinian’ flag is being used to trash every Western country, beyond the totem value of a phoney cause to justify communist and Islamic revolution. Like trashing an art gallery cause Global Warming when the real purpose was trashing the art gallery.

Why do the rioters trashing Paris wave the ‘Palestinian’ flag? Because to them, France is Israel and they’re the ‘Palestinians’ out to destroy it and replace it with their own terrorist state.

The ‘white’ in the ‘Palestinian’ flag represents the Umayyad caliphate which had once invaded France, conquered Narbonne, and genocided its Christian population, until it was thrown back by indigenous Christian resistance at the Battle of Toulouse and the Battle of Tours.

The past Islamic conquest of France is just one of the symbols in the ‘Palestinian’ flag.

The ubiquitous presence of the ‘Palestinian’ flag at riots from New York City to Milan isn’t an expression of solidarity: it’s a statement of genocidal intent for every country where it’s flown. Its colors represent the historic Islamic caliphates which once ethnically cleansed the Middle East.

Every place in the world is just a few million Muslims away from becoming another Israel. And Israel is a symbol of what the mobs intend to do to Europe and every nation they invade.

[…] The ‘Palestinian’ flag symbolizes the ability of Muslims to move to any country and then take it over. That’s what makes it a better symbol for what they are doing than any national flag or any flag short of the traditional Islamic battle flag waved by end-stage ISIS and Al Qaeda militias.

3. Muslims mass-murdered Christians in a Church in Jordan. But Christians don’t worry about it they just have a thing about Israel. or the Jews. Or something.

Jordan: Two gunmen open fire on church funeral, murdering seven, for reported ‘Islamic extremist motives’

If this was indeed a jihad attack, why would the jihadis strike at a funeral? Because the Christians were gathered together there:

“Kill them wherever you find them…” (Qur’an 2:191, 4:89, 4:91, cf. 9:5)

But why not have compassion for the mourners? Because the whole idea is to terrify and terrorize the unbelievers: “Make ready for them all that you can of force and of warhorses, so that by them you may strike terror in the enemy of Allah and your enemy…” (Qur’an 8:60)

As well as Greenfield, Jihad Watch is a must read.

Chances are, if it wasn’t for Elon Musk and his purchase of Twitter, we would never actually have known about this event at all, or, maybe a CNN sanitized and dialectically altered version of the story where the attackers were generic, tribally motivated or somehow disconnected from Islamic Jihad.

This is graphic footage showing the wounded victims at the Church in Jordan.

The above link is graphic so cannot be embedded outside of Twitter.

4. Young Israel of West Hempstead reports attempted break-in, fire: Lakeview man charged

While many people will yawn at this story, it’s worth noting that one of the mechanisms of revolution is to normalize horror by mass repetition of events like this such that the public is no longer perturbed by them. In other words, the first time a Synagogue, or even the first few Jewish institutions are vandalized because they are Jewish, the public is shocked. But at this point now it doesn’t even make the news. Even the counter-narrative news barely bothers. This newly minted lack of interest itself is the story. People can get used to anything. Perhaps part of the information warfare taking place against the legacy populations of Western nations is to normalize horror through news. To report on child rape until it stops registering as a problem. Attacks on Jewish people for being Jewish, and very soon Christians, and then all non-Muslims and opponents of communism. The arrest of people for publishing truth about Islam on social media for example, also not making the news much anymore. Well, it never made legacy news of course. But even on sites like this, with 30 arrests a day (probably a lot more) in the UK of people just stating the truth about Islam, migration or any other data or opinions that challenge state narratives, no one really reports on it much as it fails to shock. In part, it is why reading The Gulag Archipelago is so difficult. It is painful to hear endless stories of the arrest of the innocent, their torture and interrogations and prison time for nothing endlessly with no relief. Eventually, it’s just background noise.

Perhaps it may be why sites like this are tolerated even to the extent they are. Because we unwittingly assist that process.

Information warfare is so sophisticated that trying to explain even some of the simpler tactics to people results in disbelief and dismissal. Reading even just the introduction to a book like, Disinformation by Natalie Grant will straighten that out within a couple of hours. But Disinformation, or active measures as a formal method of attack has become a lot more sophisticated since the fall of the Soviet Union when that book was written. It takes a lot of sober second thought to figure out what you hear, see and even say figures in to the gestalt of the revolution that is happening around us, and more and more openly. Knowing what is true, is now the province of experts. And that is a very bad thing.

The suffering of the victims though, is not lessened whatsoever by the indifference of the population to their suffering. And yes, it is impossible to maintain outrage, anger, frustration at what is being made to happen to our former official or unofficial republics by our ruling class, we cannot let it morph into indifference. Calm, calculated action, a clear head, and a running internal inventory of what is taking place, what we are losing and what it is being replaced with, is crucial if we hope to ever get back anything like a reality based free civilization.

There are a lot of dystopian future movies and books out there, but for this particular sentiment, Fahrenheit 451 maybe says it best. Each of us recognizing that the state has totalitarian power, knows we cannot physically preserve our past and our ideas. But we can each commit to memorizing one aspect of it and bring it forward into the future.

According to Fjordman, who’s essay on this is linked at the top of every page of this site, the enlightenment in Europe happened because when the Muslims ransacked Constantinople, all the priests, monks, clergy and intellectuals grabbed armfuls of books from the treasure chest of Greek and Roman knowledge from Byzantium, and escaped Westwards towards Rome. Muslims of course eventually managed to destroy most of Byzantium’s actual history and transformed the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. But the preservation and restoration of that knowledge is what brought Europe out of a period of intellectual darkness.

So yeah, we cannot sustain the outrage and anger at these events Muslims and Communists are perpetrating against us all. but we cannot lose purpose either.

From the above linked article:

A 29-year-old Lakeview man was arrested and charged with arson and criminal mischief after allegedly attempting to set a fire at Young Israel of West Hempstead and damaging a Nassau County Police Department auxiliary vehicle near Halls Pond Park, police said.

According to Nassau County Fifth Squad detectives, officers responded to a report of criminal mischief at Halls Pond Park, 831 Hempstead Ave., at approximately 11:30 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 21. A witness reported seeing a man break the side mirror of an auxiliary police vehicle and called 911.

While officers searched for the suspect, another man stopped them and reported seeing someone starting a fire nearby, police said.

Officers responded to Young Israel of West Hempstead, at 630 Hempstead Ave., where they found Azzm Khan, 29, of Park Avenue in Lakeview, and a bush on fire.

Detectives said Khan had taken a lawn sign from the area, set it on fire and attempted to push it beneath the synagogue’s entrance door. He then allegedly placed the burning sign in a bush, causing it to catch fire, before returning to the entrance and repeatedly kicking the door, damaging it.

 

“Azzm Khan, a Lakeview man”. Ok then.

5. Probably one of the most common themes used on all counter-narrative sites, including this one for the first several years of its existence, was the device of asking people to imagine the same event but with reversed people in the same roles. It’s perfectly understandable why anyone would want to use that device. Demonstrating the grotesque difference between how the state treats the same event depending on who did it is an excellent tool for mining outrage. I don’t mean that cynically. It is a perfectly good reason to be outraged. But thinking it through, what may matter more is understanding that this outrage comes from the mistaken view that we still live in a system of law and order which at this point is vestigial. Like hip bones on a whale. They don’t do a lot of walking anymore but they still have hips.

Below what we see is not an example of two tier justice, but the replacement of the system of Rule of law with another one. One which is so consistent in its effects that to deny it is self hypnosis. Muslims and leftists may behave in certain ways that the legacy population could not even discuss or suggest on social media. This is perfectly consistent. That means there is a new system in place and not a corrupted one from the past.

Act accordingly one way or the other.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Ben Bankas actually says it about as well as it can be said. In fact it’s been like this fora very long time. In the 80s it became obvious that the Canadian state loathed success and worshipped mediocrity. But its hit a whole new level now.

 

Reader’s links for October 24th, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Quick post about a series of jihad attacks in Queens NY and why the response is guaranteed to ensure more of them

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

It’s been a busy day at Chez Tepes, but I did want to cross post this item.

A jihadi launched three attacks on the Jewish community of Queens NY and in one of them, murdered a woman as she walked along the street with her husband of 45 years.

The story is an interesting one. but the insight is at this article over at RAIR Foundation. The bottom line? Treating jihad, which is a fundamentally military problem as a law and order one is a guaranteed path to failure, and that is why leftist governments are doing it, and have been for some time now. Please read the article at RAIR.

If I had anything to add to the article at RAIR, it might be that it is worth noting how, in all the major jihad attacks in India, France, and elsewhere the terrorist group be it Pakistan’s ISI or the Islamic State or whatever other front for orthodox Islam claimed the attack that a proportion of the total resources allocated for the entire attack would be disproportionately used to attack a Jewish soft target. In India, it was the Chabad house. In France, if memory serves, it was a Jewish deli or some small business. On all of these occasions, had they not reallocated their people and various Ordnance to those specific attacks, their mass casualty attack would have been much higher. This data point should give some pretty solid indication of doctrinal Islamic antisemitism.

Reader’s Links for Oct. 23rd, 2026

Posted on by — 7 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Senator Shane Jett on the Islamic Communist threat to the West

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Here is an interview with Oklahoma State Senator, Shane Jett speaking directly to the threat to the West by the Islamic communist alliance. This was done in Ottawa at the Biker’s Church conference on the issue titled, “Are Christians Safe in Canada“.

An example of what makes Canada a dialectically driven (Narrative based) state rather than rule of law

Posted on by — Leave a reply

So we take the position that Canada, and a lot of other Western nations for that matter, but Canada for the moment, is a dialectically driven society rather than anything even similar to a Republic.

And what is meant by that is while we maintain the illusion of Rule of Law and the existence of the Individual as an entity with protected rights, in fact we are a narrative driven society. The state invents what is tantamount to divine truth, and then used the apparatus of the state to enforce that truth and punish all opposition to it, with priority going to the most influential of opposition.

So if a real climate scientist comes out against ‘Man made global warming’ they will face cancelation at best. If a doctor or scientist comes out against the various and multiple Covid and mRNA narratives, often total loss of everything. Charles Hoffe as one excellent example.

Also the organs of state are named more for what damage they do to the named function of the department, rather than serving that function. Health Canada is more about abortion, MAiD, and sterilizing and creating vast amounts of injury and illness to children under the rubric of “Trans Affirming Care” rather than actually helping them with any emotional issues which may make them suggestible to getting spayed or neutered and taking vast amounts of dangerous drugs.

Recently, Biker’s Church in Ottawa had an event on whether or not Christians are safe in Canada. They had quite an all star cast of speakers, some of whom can be seen at this RAIR Foundation article.

For the immediate purpose of this post, we wish to focus on one woman who was not a scheduled speaker, but was on the panel at the end for a Q&A.

Linda Gibbons protested abortion in a peaceful and non threatening way for which she spent eleven years in jail. A question was asked of her by RAIR Foundation during the Q&A

We hope to get more on her and her story at some point soon.

But when you compare what she did to what happened to her, and that she was exorcising her constitutionally protected freedom of speech, (and doubly so based on Canada’s charter of rights and freedoms of Diefenbaker’s) to what happens to Muslims who openly preach for mass murder, Islamic conquest and the fall of democratic or representative law, which Muslims slyly refer to as, “Man made law” implying that their sharia replacement is somehow not just the fantasies of a medieval warlord but somehow passed down by God as absolute and mandatory for all of humanity, then we start to get a picture of how Canada is a dialectically driven society. Something legal gets a harmless older woman 11 years in jail, but an endless parade of imams can call for mass deaths and the destruction of Canada’s entire system of laws and governance to be replaced with their own, and the only ones that make it to a court are the ones caught ready to commit murder directly. At least for the moment.

This is just one example from a Toronto mosque. Pretty much nothing happened to anyone involved but the Toronto Star actually hired a translator known to make bogus translations from Arabic to try and cover this guy’s tracks. No jail time for anyone though and as far as we know, no job losses or cancel-culture consequences either. but certainly no 11 years in jail.

This was just the easiest example to find at the moment. If you go to MEMRI.org it will take time to get more examples only because there are so many you have to really refine your search terms.

So: Protesting against the deaths of people yet to be born, 11 years in jail for a woman with no criminal record or history of violence, and none for those advocating for genocide and the overthrow of republic-democratic law to be replaced with sharia.

OK then.

Here is an AI generated list of links of Imams in Canada advocating for that which is illegal under several statutes:

MEMRI-Documented Canadian Imam Sermons

1. Younus Kathrada (Victoria, BC) — Muslim Youth Victoria

This is your most prolific subject. MEMRI has at least three separate clips of him:

Date MEMRI Clip # Key Content
July 31, 2026(sermon), posted Aug 3, 2026 #12963 Palestine is Muslim land; no “infidel” (non-Muslim) can rule it; must be governed by sharia, not democracy or “infidel laws”; Muslims’ duty to expel the Jews from Palestine; prayed for Allah to “destroy the plundering and occupying Jews along with the infidels and hypocrites that help them” and to grant victory to the mujahideen
Nov 24, 2023 #10725 Titled “Is Islam at War?”; Israel has no right to defend itself; prayed: “Oh Allah, bring annihilation upon the plundering and criminal Jews”
June 24, 2022 #9663 Homosexuality is an “abomination”; again prayed for Allah to “bring annihilation upon the plundering, criminal Jews” and to return the Al-Aqsa Mosque to Muslim control

All three were sourced from the Muslim Youth Victoria YouTube channel. Kathrada has been the subject of a joint Vancouver police / RCMP hate-crime probe (reported by the World Jewish Congress) and a criminal complaint filed by CIJA.

2. Moulana Amir Hosein Amazi (Toronto) — Madina Tul Ilm Mosque

Date MEMRI Clip # Key Content
Sep 25, 2026 #13054 Friday sermon marking the anniversary of Nasrallah’s assassination; prayed that America and the Israeli regime be destroyed “as swiftly as possible” with the help of Imam Mahdi; praised Hizbullah mujahideen

Sourced from “Madina Tul Ilm Toronto on YouTube.”

3. Imam Ayman Taher (Ontario)

Date MEMRI Clip # Key Content
Apr 18, 2025 #11973 “Vote Palestine” sermon ahead of Canadian federal elections; warned against political parties “hijacking” the Canadian Muslim community; less explicitly violent but framed Canada’s political future through a Muslim solidarity lens

4. Abdullah Hakim Quick (Toronto) — TARIC Islamic Centre

Date MEMRI Clip # Key Content
Apr 25, 2025 #11977 Following the Pope’s death; said the Prophet said Jesus would return to “break the crosses, slay all pigs”; compared Vatican Christians to ancient Christians who were invited to Islam or paid the jizya poll tax; said Christians “have no modesty, use pagan symbols”

5. Montreal Mosque (Al-Andalous / AS-SSunah) — 2017

Not on MEMRI’s Canada clips page directly, but well-documented:

  • An imam at a Montreal mosque recited the notorious hadith about stones and trees calling Muslims to kill Jews hiding behind them (the “Gharqad tree” hadith). This was reported by CBC, Times of Israel, and the CJN. A second anti-Semitic sermon from the same mosque surfaced weeks later. A police warrant was issued for the imam (a Palestinian-Jordanian national, per BBC).

Where the Videos Actually Are

MEMRI’s full video clips are behind their paywall/archives for professionals. But the original sources are all on YouTube:

  • Kathrada’s sermons: Muslim Youth Victoria YouTube channel
  • Amazi’s sermon: Madina Tul Ilm Toronto YouTube channel
  • Taher’s sermon: Ayman Taher YouTube channel
  • Quick’s sermon: TARIC Islamic Centre YouTube channel

We will post more on the Biker’s Church event soon. But for the moment, we wanted to give this thought a little oxygen. The juxtaposition between treatment of these groups of people is too severe. There was also a Catholic Priest, who’s photo randomly appears as the banner for this site, who was repeatedly jailed for holding a sign within a block of a abortuarium which read, “Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of Civilization”.

He never confronted a woman having an abortion. he merely advocated for freedom of speech where none is allowed.

 

Staggering amount of Hegelian language used by Texas Senatorial political candidate, James Talarico

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Just observing patterns here, but it seems to me that when a candidate openly advocates for this much communist policy and uses this much dialectical language, or put another way, initiate language of the left, they believe the election is rigged for them. That way when they ‘win’, they can implement the policies with the plausible idea that the majority of the people actually voted for them and face less resistance.

For those that remember several of James O’Keefe’s hidden cam reveals of Democrat politicians, there was a solid theme back in 2020 and 2016. The leftist candidates would all lie about what they wanted, but talking to volunteers and campaign staff, they were of course open about their real intentions. Those elections were only fraudulent then, in the sense that the candidates were not honest in order to trick people into voting for them. Then they would move policy leftwards.

Full text:

Every word is James Talarico’s. 27 clips. 4 minutes. 2019–2026. “God is non-binary.” “…many more than two biological sexes. In fact, there are six.” “If you deny your child’s gender identity… it’s abusive for sure.” “There’s only one person who can determine a child’s gender identity, and that’s the child.” “I want to acknowledge that our trans community needs abortion care too.” “…the bill that would have denied gender-affirming health care to trans children… All these ideologies stem from this Christofascism movement.” “The way I fought for trans kids in the legislature is how I will fight for the U.S. Senate, and my position hasn’t changed.” “Prophetic voices like Jesus have helped me reckon with my own whiteness.” “It’s always rich to me that defund the police is considered off limits…” “Prison is violence.” “Tear down this secret police force.” Assault weapons ban? “Absolutely.” Send this to 10 Texas voters and tell them to vote today.

But when someone is this open about their intentions, and it should be obvious, perhaps especially in Texas that they could not be elected with this platform, it makes one suspect that they have machinery in place to help assure an electoral victory beyond the one person one vote model.

Reader’s Links for Oct. 22, 2026

Posted on by — 11 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Leonard Cohen in 2009 describes writing in a nascent communist Canada/West

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

I thought this description, and Cohen’s repeated use of the term, “Slogan” to be very interesting. Especially back in 2009: He describes how various political slogans dramatically affects how and what artists can write and say.

In the following video, Counter-spell group discusses how what we call, Political Warfare, which appears to be what Cohen describes as ‘slogans’ is really a much older method of control of the public called, “Spell-craft”.

It’s a fascinating video and explains a great deal of modern political phenomenon. Specifically how nearly all of entire populations will, for example, inject themselves multiple times with untested gene therapy even though it should have been obvious to all of them, that all they were told about the disease and the shots were transparent lies. Nothing which has never been tested can be known to be “safe and effective” for example. So we know it was a lier.

At VladTepes we think of this kind of spell-craft as ‘incantations’. Repeat it enough and it has an effect on people. It becomes an instruction.

Looking at the Alberta Referendum and Carney’s secret deal with the EU leaked?

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Comment by JU:

The engineered failure of Europe will be accelerated by the engineered failure of its energy supplies. EU climate management rules (aka Lysenko-like scientism) will continue to decarbonize (and deindustrialize) that continent into ultimate submission to the Comintern. Meanwhile, Mark Carney annexes Canada to Europe so to be the arbiter of valued Canadian natural resources, and subprime human capital, between continents. Brookfield Asset management, Carney’s company, will broker carbon credits to profit from the interstitial ideological lunacy these credits represent. Brookfield has also moved into the heat pump space promoted by Carney for all Canadian households. Heat pumps also occupy the interstitial space between modest effectiveness and freezing solid in the Canadian cold, the former being a lousy gamble even in air-conditioning mode.

Meanwhile, Red China very cleverly creates a conversion mechanism for its non-fungible currency, the Yuan, by creating a clearing house in Hong Kong through which it will launder Yuan for gold. This is mafia-style economics while wearing sovereign suits.

HIs comment contains links to two video. The salient bit of one of them is this Western Standard article about a leaked deal Carney made with the EU which at least on the surface may be some kind of deal to benefit Brookfield. But given that Carney states in his book that his role models are Marx, Engles and Lenin, and that he considers the problems of the West to be derived from ‘Capitalism’, an analysis that fits better would look more like anything that moves power away from the people of the region being ruled, and ideally to unknown, faceless all powerful bureaucrats as far away as possible so that the public actually have no chance of changing how things work in their day to day lives. Central planning don’t ya know. Canadian mineral and other natural resources will be planned and managed by the Communist EU and the CCP. And Canada will make scarcity very well. Which after all, is the only product that socialism always delivers on time.

From The Western Standard:

Canadians are being sold “associate membership” in the European Union without being told what it means or what Ottawa has already offered Brussels in the backrooms. A recent Nanos poll found significant support for the idea among Canadians. Were respondents shown the leaked document Ottawa drafted for discussions with Brussels, given a clear definition of associate membership, or reminded that Canada already has comprehensive trade and defence agreements with the EU? No. 

While Mark Carney tells Canadians and Albertans that Confederation rests on sovereignty, consultation, and strong provincial partners, the document his government sent to Brussels in September tells a different story: Ottawa is prepared to bargain away pieces of that sovereignty without consulting the people and provinces that hold it. Albertans who still believe the federation will protect their resources, their industries, and their constitutional powers may not have much time left to decide whether staying is worth the risk of closer EU alignment.

While Mark Carney tells Canadians and Albertans that Confederation rests on sovereignty, consultation, and strong provincial partners, the document his government sent to Brussels in September tells a different story: Ottawa is prepared to bargain away pieces of that sovereignty without consulting the people and provinces that hold it. Albertans who still believe the federation will protect their resources, their industries, and their constitutional powers may not have much time left to decide whether staying is worth the risk of closer EU alignment.

Lastly, while it is true that Alberta’s cities, Calgary and Edmonton, like all big cities now are far to the left of reality, (a luxury people who live far from the farms and factories that make all the stuff they consume can enjoy temporarily) one may still question how well Monday’s referendum was conducted. And the fact that they allowed mail in ballots, I believe half a million of them, may suggest a planned outcome by the provincial apparatus, since mail ins tend to always favour the collectivist options on any vote.

Asking BRAVE’s AI on the numbers: “519,082 special mail-in ballots were received and counted in Alberta’s October 19, 2026 referendum. This figure represented a tenfold increase compared to the 2023 provincial election and accounted for approximately 43% of the province’s eligible voters, who had already cast their votes before the main election day.”

I asked a follow up: ‘Is it known which way the mail ins were counted? For me at least, the answer raises an eyebrow. Actually high enough to catch in your hat.

There’s no official breakdown by voting method — Elections Alberta reports results by riding and by question, but not separately for mail-in vs. in-person ballots. The special ballots are counted at the same facility and reported alongside in-person ballots.

What is known is a striking participation pattern: mail-in voters were heavily concentrated on Question 10 (the separation question). As one analysis noted, “almost all the mail-in ballots appear to have only answered question 10.” The numbers back this up — Q10 drew roughly 1.9 million votes, while the other nine questions each had participation ranging from only 1 to 1.5 million. Since each question is on a separate ballot and voters can choose to answer any subset, many mail-in voters apparently marked only the separation ballot.

This disparity fueled online speculation of fraud (e.g., claims that Q10 had “38% more votes than actual eligible voters”), which Elections Alberta and analysts have dismissed. The explanation is that the special ballot option was newly unrestricted for the first time, and many of the 519,000+ mail-in voters were specifically motivated by the separation question rather than all ten issues.

As for the direction of mail-in votes on Q10 (remain vs. separate), that’s not publicly broken out. The overall result was ~75% remain / ~24% separate, but you can’t tell from the public data how that split looked among mail-in voters specifically.

We already know the Fed Guv has no ethics, morals or concerns about the law or constitution. Anyone who does not already know that, please go back to listening to CBC. You will find it much more comforting than this site. We know that The Rebel already busted some interference with the referendum for the remain side:

https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_fact_check_elections_alberta_confirms_lukaszuks_forever_canada_petition_was_always_a_referendum_campaign

https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_fact_check_is_thomas_lukaszuks_organization_operating_legally_during_a_referendum_campaign

Search Rebel News for more on Thomas Lukaszuk if you want.

So the patters reads:

Federal Government does the opposite of enforce border control and immigration laws.

Federal Government does the opposite of protect individual rights and has now passed a LOT of legislation which de jure actually makes the state the controller of the most fundamental of basic rights. Like bill C4, criminalizing parents if they try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered at the suggestion of a teacher or whatever other state agent.

Federal Government invoked the Emergency Measures Act, technically the renamed, War Measures Act (in retrospect one wonders if they did not rename it because they expected serious conflict to come from Canadians against the nascent communist state rather than external threats?) in order to quell the Freedom Convoy. An event which at least one brave federal Judge actually ruled was unconstitutional.

So its not much of a stretch to believe the same state government would interfere with a Provincial election where the main issue was the sovereignty of the people in Alberta, the most wealthy province in Canada since Newfoundland farmed out all the lobsters.

Weird about those mail ins only having time to mark question 10 isn’t it? It’s almost like there were far fewer voters than ballots or something.

Reader’s Links for Oct. 21 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.