Ron Johnson testimony broken down and posted at RAIR and French Riot videos along with Ceuta Op Trampoline videos

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. The article and our own footage of Senator Ron Johnson’s appearance at Ottawa’s Allison Inquiry over the Covid measures and mRNA injection damages is now published at RAIR.

Please skip over and give it a look. We broke down the multi-hour presentation of Senator Johnson into watchable chunks with details on each one.

First video of the series here as bait:

Canadians should be aware, Sen. Johnson also spoke to the tensions between Canada and the USA right now as a preamble to the subject of the mRNA shots and their damage. He did not downplay the seriousness of them, but was not over the top either. I think its important for Canadians to understand what the communist leaders of Europe and Canada and the UN are leading is into here.

2.The media, as it has for some time now is working as a key component to the communist revolution overtaking England, France, Spain, Canada and elsewhere in the nations which are the inheritors of Greco-Roman Civilization. The dialectic is to call the Muslims and Communists destroying everything, “Students”. In a comment yesterday, Yucki reminded us that in the 1979 Communist revolution in Iran that was then taken over by the Muslims, our media also called the revolutionaries, “Students”.

This appears to be France. Please note the banners that the “students” are carrying. Grok identified them as:

FSE is a revolutionary student syndicate, not a general communist party flag. It is tied to the far-left student left and often marches with red flags, Palestine flags, and other radical groups. The cardboard sign at the far left is separate and not fully readable.

A branch-office of the Communist party is still Communist.

I remember an old friend in the 1980s visited France and described Paris as “smelling like dog-sh*t and diesel”. I bet they miss that smell now.

Ceuta Spain:

Police allegedly clear migrant camp on beach. Moving them into 3 or 4 star hotels? That’s where they are in Ottawa.

More than 350 Security agents for Operation Trampoline

Reader’s Links for Oct. 6 2026

Posted on by — 6 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Just two items. The “Students” rioting in France seem to have a lot of communist symbols, and an Essay at RAIR on Civilization Vs. Islam

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

France. A short video. When you see media talking about these riots as due to cuts in education, think of it as Covid coming from a Wuhan wet-market after a bat had sex with a Pangolin

Islam Vs. Civilization.

Islam seeks to erase the pre-Islamic past—its art, monuments, history, culture, and competing beliefs—and the West, once driven to preserve knowledge, create beauty, explore new frontiers, and defend individual freedom, now risks surrendering its own civilization by refusing to confront and resist that destruction.

Here are a few videos, each of which reflects in a deep way the fundamentals of the cultures spawned by Islam Vs. those that descended from the origins of Western Civilization. And more importantly the system of thought that supplies the power behind each way of existing. What we call, Civilization, that amalgam of Jewish legal tradition, Christian ethics, Greek systems of philosophy and determining truth, and Roman political systems, all of which together form our values, esteem of life, art, aesthetics, the mastery of skills, of accumulating and sharing knowledge for the future and the greater achievement of mankind. To achieve the impossible through great personal effort, even when that effort is of questionable value or inspiration, or even with no consideration of personal gain.

The commissioner of the work of art inn the video below was an alchemist. But clearly was not of the kind of alchemist who was examining paths of destruction of humanity to scrape out its fleck of gold, but rather a proto-scientist who cherished the natural world and wished to be able to recreate it in order to understand it. One can look at that work of art and see its connection to the moon landings of the 1960s. We did it because “it was hard”. because it was a challenge and because our scientific and Western minds demanded that we breach new frontiers in pursuit of knowledge for a better and more beautiful and wondrous world along with better conditions for Humanity.

Please read the article and see the videos at RAIR Foundation

 

Reader’s Links for October 5th, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Sky-News Oz is the only MSM media left with any truth, An interesting day today for Brazil and more: Links 1 for Oct. 5, 2026

Posted on by — 7 Comments ↓

1. Sky News Australia may be the last man standing when it comes to actual information under the news rubric on main stream broadcast media. Some people are taking this clip and putting it out there saying it’s proof of how corrupt the media is that they didn’t let him speak more. But having been aware of media censorship on any counter-narrative view for some time now, I think we can all agree that during Covid, they NEVER allowed any expert on who was critical of the Covid measures, the safety and efficacy of the shots and if someone did manage to get behind an MSM mic the moment he deviated from script he was cut off and excoriated and the narrative corrected before they could cut to commercial.

In this clip, an Australian pilot manages to explain that the Fly Dubai flight was an act of Islamic Jihad because Muslims feel they have to kill Jews, and further, he leaned on his own expertise as someone who worked as a pilot in the Middle East with various airlines as a pilot. They simply wouldn’t have had him on at all if they were being censorious of these views. So full congratulations to Sky News Oz for this one.

We think they let him speak till the second they figure they would lose their broadcast licence, or the West is past the point of needing to hide the true nature of Islam and therefore is less concerned about what people say about it as there is nearly nothing easy that can be done about it anyway.

2. Today is election day in Brazil. I should have said, “Election day” given what the communists in Brazil did to Bolsonaro at the last election and subsequently. Here is a couple of emails I got from our correspondent down there.

today is our election day in Brazil. Apparently, Flavio Bolsonaro is going to win, but it is difficult to say even if those electronic voting machines were reliable.
In any case, if he does win, it is highly probable the supreme court will intervene and do something, declaring international interference or any other excuse to keep lula in power.
Those same that say the system is 100% safe and that put people in prison for questioning the machines, now are saying Trump is the culprit if Flavio wins.
Unfortunately, I can see friends, family and colleagues arguing that maybe communism is not so bad. It is crazy unbelievable.

To which I responded:

Thank you for this.

Is Flavio Bolsonaro the same Bolsonaro who was president before Lula? I thought he had another first name. Relative?

The answer:

Jair Bolsonaro is the former president. He is in jail (at home now), completely isolated and forbidden to make any public appearance; a couple of people only are allowed to visit him.
He is the father of Flavio Bolsonaro, who is running today, and Eduardo Bolsonaro, who is in USA bringing information about Brazil to the White House, together with Paulo Figueiredo, a reporter and grandson of General Joao Batista Figueiredo, a former president in the 80s. 
Both of them had to flee from Brazil, otherwise they would be in prison for complaining about Alexandre de Moraes and the supreme court.
There is another son, Carlos Bolsonaro, who is “less active”, but also into the politics.

<

We have tens of people, including many journalists, who had to leave the country to avoid prison.

We should be able to test the predictive value of this within hours. Apparently Bolsonaro is doing very well.
>Flávio Bolsonaro 50.63%, Liberal party (PL) | 21,383,323 votes
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 41.44%, Workers’ party (PT) | 19,903,245 votes

3. This seems like something that once upon a time would be considered a threat. No?

4. Sam Cooper: We are at war with China. This video is just under an hour. But Sam Cooper is the man when it comes to Chinese interference with Canadian politics

5. Reality becomes liquid as one cannot tell the police from the rioters

Related article

Hundreds of schools remain closed Monday across France amid student protests

24 schools ‘burned or ransacked’ since start of protests across country, says Edouard Geffray

Up to 500 schools across France will be fully or partially closed Monday due to ongoing violent student protests, the education minister said Sunday.

Classes will be “fully or partially suspended” at some 400-500 high schools because security conditions “have not been fulfilled,” Edouard Geffray was quoted by France 24 as saying.

The official added that 24 schools had been “burned or ransacked” since the start of the student protests demanding better learning conditions.

“There are activists – particularly from the far-left – who have infiltrated the high school student movement, hijacked it from the students themselves, and engaged in extreme violence,” Geffray said.

He said the protests posed a risk to both staff and students, adding that 78 education staff members had been wounded, “something we have never seen before.”

According to the latest data, more than 5,000 people, 85% of them minors, have been arrested since the start of the unrest.

Several organizations representing the student movement, together with left-wing and far-left political groups, have called for a second round of mobilization on Oct. 6 against what they described as police “repression.”

But by who, and why?

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

Reader’s Links for October 4th, 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

France, Canada, US trade, Spain: The revolution as both invasion and bolshevik style street action: Links 1 for Oct. 3, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. I’d like to draw your attention to this article at RAIR. Like a lot of the articles and events that this site tries to zoom in on, this one, while not spectacular in terms of violence etc. is critically important in terms of understanding the engine behind the destruction of the West. In this case, it is how the government of Spain knew about the invasion, that Morocco had even warned them multiple times before it took place that it would and a great deal more information that is pretty much a slam dunk that Leftist Western governments have and are engineering the total demise of Western Civilization and deracination of Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman values and systems of thought.

Furthermore, that dozens of Moroccan military personnel are embedded within the invading forces to monitor Spanish Military and security apparatus response to the invasion, and not for Spanish evaluation.

‘Migration Was Only the Formal Cover’: 72 Moroccan Military Coordinators Embedded in Ceuta

Spanish army intelligence has identified at least 72 Moroccan military personnel still operating inside Ceuta, two months after 80,000 people surged across the border on July 30. Twenty-two are agents of Rabat’s intelligence services. Fifty are soldiers embedded in the invasion. Seven additional Moroccan reservists voluntarily presented themselves to Spanish National Police. The classified reports describe them as “centers of gravity” for financing and controlling the settlements still occupying the city.

The original reporting appeared in El Español on September 28, based on three classified army reports and a senior military officer who spoke on the record. The Telemadrid broadcast summarized the same reports. Brussels Signal confirmed the details independently.

The officer’s assessment is unambiguous: “We have confirmed that there are 72 Moroccan military personnel in Ceuta, and we don’t know if there could be more.”

Please read the whole article at RAIR linked above. The links also will bring you to major related reveals on the nature of this event. This is the revolution gone overt.

2. Those of you aware of the US somehow managing not to deploy the death penalty to a convicted criminal in the US can imagine how Canadians are seeing this. Basically the US should just send over those on death row and have them enter as refugees claiming they are depressed.

3. Overt October 1917 level communist revolutionary action in France remains extreme.

One of the signs shown, translates as: “The youth tells the Front National to Piss off” except they use the French word for shit in it. Merde. So… not a conservative movement here. We should very much appreciate though, that the video has a sort of warning on it, that Euronews is funded in whole or in part by the EU. That is refreshing. Normally they don’t put any kind of caveat on leftist enemy propaganda, and Euronews most certainly is. They are as deceptive and purpose driven as the CBC in Canada.

4. Moose on the Loose covers the right events in his videos. But to the surprise of no-one I don’t always agree with his analysis of those events.

In the case of the first story, the important part is that the state will use defacto methods to destroy people that state counter-narrative views publicly. At least where they cannot use De Jure methods to do so. What should concern us is how it is now trickling down to the plebs. During the communist revolution in the West of 2020, only doctors and scientists and people of influence got punished for stating counter-narrative views, usually more true than the narrative naturally, but now its a guy in a T shirt working at a brewery. And why would that even make the news? As to “not the smartest thing to do to wear it on the national day of blah blah blah” that’s like saying “He broke up with me on the day I found out my turtle was sick”. What would be a good day to break up with you then? Either you believe in freedom of speech or you do not. Trying to amplify the harm done by speaking truth to narrative by referencing a fake holiday based on narrative is more enemy propaganda. And that is just the first item. Nonetheless, the video, like all the MOTL videos are worth seeing to get the events.

5. Another video on the Canada-US trade issues.

Related issue. Many Canadian media outlets will refer to the banning of American products in Canadian stores as a “boycott”. To be clear, a boycott typically means you have the choice of buying something and chose not to do so for whatever reasons. Like all the dialectical language of Canada now, they try and make it look like something the people have chosen, as opposed to imposed on the people by the state. I would like to buy American liquor, but apparently I can’t because the only outlet legally allowed to sell liquor in Ontario, the LCBO, will not allow the sale of US made booze. Therefore I do not have the choice to buy it. So it is not a boycott. Much like the mRNA shots were forced on the public. No, they didn’t put a gun to your head or strap you down and make you take it, although yes, they certainly did to that in many cases to the very vulnerable, but generally they coerced it to the point that the law would have called it force, had it been a secretary that didn’t go out on a date with her boss and got fired for it. This is just another state mass line narrative attack. The attempt is to make Canadians think it’s their idea to disconnect from the US by mass lines against Trump, and against American products as if somehow Donald J. Trump personally profited by every bottle of Jack Daniels or Wild Turkey that was imported to Canada.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

A note about Canada’s bill C-218 which is being voted on Wednesday

This bill attempts to stop the expansion of Canada’s MAiD program to allow the state to murder people based solely on a mental illness diagnosis. Specifically that being Mentally Ill is enough reason to qualify for state administered death.

If recent history is any example, the categories of medical illness will expand to include political views. This is not new. This is how the Soviets did it, and … well I asked my current favorite AI LLM what states used mental illness as a political instrument and here was the response:

Communist States
Soviet Union — The flagship case. The Moscow School of Psychiatry, led by Andrei Snezhnevsky, developed “sluggish schizophrenia” (also called “sluggish-type schizophrenia” or “reformist delusion”), a diagnosis broad enough to cover anyone who opposed the regime but still functioned normally in society. The underlying logic was explicit: since the Soviet system was the best in the world, anyone willing to sacrifice career, family, and freedom to oppose it must be mentally ill. Roughly one-third of Soviet political prisoners were locked in psychiatric hospitals rather than prisons, treated with neuroleptics (often with irreversible side effects). The KGB and Communist Party directed the program. Diagnoses included “sluggish schizophrenia,” “paranoid development with delusions of reform,” and “political intoxication.”

Romania  — Ceausescu’s regime used psychiatric imprisonment systematically. A 1997 IAPUP investigative committee confirmed several hundred victims of punitive psychiatry. A recent (2025) academic article frames it as “Psychiatric Violence as Communist Statecraft.”

People’s Republic of China — Ongoing and systematic. Chinese psychiatric literature explicitly labels political dissidents, petitioners, and Falun Gong practitioners as mentally ill (the diagnosis “political paraphrenia” appears in official texts). Robin Munro’s research documented this extensively. The World Psychiatric Association has repeatedly debated sanctions against China over it.

Cuba — Documented but described as shorter-lived and smaller in scale than the Soviet or Chinese programs.

Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria — Individual cases confirmed, but no evidence of a systematic state program.

East Germany (GDR) — Despite close intertwining of politics and psychiatry, researchers concluded there was no systematic political abuse program (controversial finding).

Nazi Germany
The Nazi case differs in character. Rather than diagnosing dissenters as mentally ill, the regime moved in the opposite direction: it declared the mentally ill and disabled as political/biological threats to the Volksgemeinschaft. The T4 “euthanasia” program murdered an estimated 200,000+ psychiatric patients. The Nazis also sterilized roughly 400,000 people diagnosed with hereditary conditions. This was the politicization of psychiatry inverted: not “dissent is illness” but “illness justifies extermination.” Political opponents (communists, social democrats) were more likely sent straight to concentration camps than to psychiatric wards.

Core Pattern
What unites the communist cases (and distinguishes them from Nazi Germany) is a shared totalitarian logic: the state defines the range of acceptable belief, and deviation from it is ipso facto evidence of pathology. As the PMC historical overview puts it, the Soviet premise was that “persons who opposed the Soviet regime were mentally ill because there was no other logical explanation why one would oppose the best sociopolitical system in the world.” The Civic Solidarity Platform’s 2017 report notes that “virtually all cases of political abuse of psychiatry took place in collectivist (socialist or communist) states.”

Interesting. I know which one Canada most resembles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“From the Masjid to City Hall”: Muslims from the US Are Coming to Canada to Teach Muslims in Canada How to Take Political Power
On October 10, 2026, the Hilton Toronto Markham will host a training session. The trainers are Muslim elected officials from the United States. The trainees are Muslims in Canada. The subject is how to capture political power for Islamic interests.

The session is called “From the Masjid to City Hall”. The convention is the 24th Annual UMAA Convention, organized by the Universal Muslim Association of America, a Shia Muslim NGO with consultative status at the United Nations. The theme: “The Next Chapter: From Identity to Impact.”

Last year’s convention focused on narrative and identity: how Shia communities are perceived. This year’s focus is impact: obtaining power inside public institutions. The shift is stated explicitly. “The Global Shia Narrative: Identity, Challenges, and Opportunities” has become “From Identity to Impact.” The mosque is the base. City hall is the target.

The Speakers
Abdullah Hammoud is the Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, the first Muslim and first Arab mayor in the city’s history. Dearborn is the city where, in April 2024, protesters at an Al-Quds Day rally chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”. Hammoud condemned those chants as “unacceptable and contrary to the heart of this city.” He also vowed to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu “for war crimes if he enters city limits”, and snubbed a meeting with Biden’s campaign manager over the Gaza war.

In September 2025, Hammoud told a Christian pastor at a City Council meeting that he was “a bigot, a racist, and an Islamophobe” who was “not welcome here,” adding that he would “launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out.” The pastor, Ted Barham, had questioned a city sign honoring Osama Siblani, a local publisher accused of supporting Hezbollah. Hammoud did not apologize. In September 2026, a federal lawsuit was filed alleging anti-Christian and anti-Jewish discrimination by Dearborn and its mayor, claiming the city “celebrated” Muslim holidays while denying equal treatment to Christian and Jewish residents.

Alabas Farhat is a Michigan State Representative from District 3, covering Dearborn and parts of Detroit. He condemned the “Death to America” chants at the April 2024 rally, calling them harmful and divisive. His legislative focus, however, tells a different story. He has called on the United States to “enforce its own Lebanon-Israel agreement” (meaning: restrain Israel), urged action on behalf of American citizens “stranded in Lebanon” during the Hezbollah conflict, and advocated for the return of American citizens from Gaza. His advocacy runs consistently against Israel and in favor of Islamic causes, from Lebanon to Gaza.

Akbar Ali is a 21-year-old Georgia State Representative, District 106, the youngest state legislator in Georgia’s history. He assumed office on December 18, 2025. He was endorsed and celebrated by CAIR-Georgia, which hailed his election as a victory for the Muslim community. His public record is thin: he has been in office for less than a year. What matters is that CAIR built him, CAIR backed him, and CAIR is now exporting him to Canada as a model.

Ali Aljarrah is not an elected official. He is a Senior Advisor at CAIR Action NJ, the political arm of CAIR in New Jersey, and serves as treasurer on the CAIR NJ board. CAIR Action NJ endorsed 22 state assembly candidates in the 2025 election cycle. Aljarrah is the machine builder: his job is to organize Muslims in the US into a voting bloc and elect them. He is coming to Canada to teach Muslims in Canada how to replicate the machine.

The Organization Counting the Army
The numbers come from CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. In August 2026, CAIR counted 255 Muslim elected officials across 26 states, the highest number ever recorded. By 2028, CAIR projects more than a thousand Muslims running for office. “The wave is not coming. It is already here.”

CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, the largest terrorism financing trial in American history. Government trial documents identified CAIR as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, whose purpose was to support Hamas “with media, money and political support.” CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, said in 1994: “I’m in support of the Hamas movement.” After October 7, 2023, Awad said he was “happy” to see people “breaking the siege”.

CAIR disputes the co-conspirator label, noting that a federal judge found the Justice Department violated the Fifth Amendment rights of named organizations by publicly filing the list. The Fifth Circuit ruling addressed procedure, not substance. The government’s trial brief identified CAIR as part of the Palestine Committee. The documents are public record.

This is the organization counting the 255 elected officials and projecting a thousand candidates by 2028. This is the organization whose senior adviser is coming to Markham to teach Muslims in Canada how to build the same machine.

The Overt Version, Cancelled
Months before UMAA’s convention in Markham, another Islamic conference was planned in Ontario. Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada announced its “Khilafah Conference 2025: Eliminating the Obstacles that are Delaying its Return,” set for January 18, 2025, in Mississauga. The conference was to promote the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate under Sharia law.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international pan-Islamic organization founded in 1953 in East Jerusalem. Its stated aim is the re-establishment of the Islamic caliphate and the implementation of Sharia globally. It has been banned as a terrorist organization in the United Kingdom (January 2024), Germany, Russia, China, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Australia, and all Arab countries except Lebanon, Yemen, and the UAE. The UK Home Secretary described it as “an antisemitic organization that actively promotes and encourages terrorism.”

The Khilafah Conference was cancelled after public backlash and pressure from Canadian intelligence agencies that were assessing whether to designate Hizb ut-Tahrir as a terrorist entity under Canadian law. The Israeli Ambassador to Canada called on the government to ban the group. The conference was moved from Mississauga to Hamilton, then cancelled entirely.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is the overt version. UMAA is the institutional version. Both are about Islamic power in Canada. Hizb ut-Tahrir says “caliphate.” UMAA says “city hall.” The first was shut down. The second is proceeding, with the backing of an organization identified in federal court documents as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, with speakers who include a mayor who told a Christian he is “not welcome” in his city, a state representative who advocates for Lebanon against Israel, a 21-year-old CAIR product, and a CAIR political operative whose job is to build the machine.

The Doctrine That Connects Them
The link between the cancelled caliphate conference and the proceeding city hall conference is not analogy. It is doctrine. In Islamic law, the world is divided into Dar al-Islam (the house of Islam, where Sharia governs) and Dar al-Harb (the house of war, where it does not). Between them is Dar al-Ahd, the house of covenant: non-Muslim territory where Muslims live under a pact of security with the host state. Under the covenant, jihad does not cease. It changes form.

Imam Tom Facchine, an American convert to Islam and a scholar at the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, was asked about this by a devout Muslim in traditional dress, a full beard without moustache, the appearance of a man who takes his religion seriously enough to dress against the norms of the country he lives in. The questioner’s concern was that classifying the United States as Dar al-Ahd would “divorce Muslims in America from Muslims of the rest of the world who, uncomfortably, are actively at war with the country that we’re residing in.” His concern, in other words, was that the covenant would prevent Muslims from waging kinetic jihad alongside the Ummah.

Facchine corrected him. The struggle does not stop. The means change. Jihad in Dar al-Ahd is “with the pen and with politics.” That is what jihad is in Dar al-Ahd.

[EMBED VIDEO HERE]

The convention in Markham is that jihad. “From the Masjid to City Hall” is the pen and politics. The shift from identity to impact is the shift from narrative to power. The doctrine says it is jihad. The scholar says it is jihad. The convention’s own theme says it in softer words.

The Wave Already Here
The convention’s own framing makes the strategy explicit. Last year: identity. This year: impact. Last year: how Shia communities are perceived. This year: obtaining power inside public institutions. The shift from narrative to power is the stated plan, in the convention’s own words, on its own promotional materials.

The CAIR numbers track the trajectory: 255 elected officials today, a thousand candidates by 2028. The UMAA convention is the training ground for the Canadian phase. The speakers are the products of the American phase. The strategy is the same: use democratic institutions to advance Islamic interests, elect Muslims to public office, and use those offices to consolidate Islamic power inside the institutions that govern everyone.

The province that shut down the caliphate conference is hosting the city hall conference. The first said Sharia. The second says “impact.” The goal is the same. The method is quieter.

This is a global project. This is not a Canadian story. We are exposing a global template of methods for total Islamic control of Western civilization, and the accompanying destruction of all cultures and systems of governance of all the inheritors of Greco-Roman, Judeo-Christian civilization and 5,000 years of history and growth.

Tags: UMAA, CAIR, Dearborn, Markham, Ontario, Muslims in Canada, political power, Sharia, caliphate, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Abdullah Hammoud, city hall,

 

Reader’s Links for October 3rd, 2026

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Riots in France videos

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Apparently the new euphemism for students and Muslims engaged in political violence, is “Students”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The application of law as it concerns state apparatus and more: Links post 1 for Oct. 2, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. One of the most difficult aspects of trying to explain to people that Canada is a communist country, is that people have a fictional and imaginary concept of what communism is. The same goes for war. When you try and explain that the Left and Islam is waging war on Classical civilization, if it doesn’t look like Remains of the Day when they look down the street, they don’t believe it, even as their culture, laws, property, values and even vocabulary is stolen or repurposed for them.

The following story might be a good example of that premise. In Communist polities, the elite are exempt from the laws they force on all the peasants. The more communist it is, the greater the number of agencies that are immune from the law. So it is a matter of degree really. One might argue that in the US, the fact that it is a crime to lie to the FBI but not only can the FBI lie to you, they are instructed to, if it helps them achieve their purpose. Somewhat like Book 0 Justice in Reliance of the Traveller where lying to serve Islam is permitted if the goal is permitted, and mandatory if the goal is obligatory.

This story out of Canada I’ll leave for people to comment as to whether or not this fits a communist polity. But the RCMP seem to have an increasing number of these kinds of things, and some of them much larger scale than this incident, which really is criminal incompetence on behalf of an officer, but nets no transparency and likely no punishment compared to anyone else in Canada who had done the same thing. Ezra Levant once accused Diagalon and Second Sons as being “Feds”. That went to court, and the judge felt it was possible if not actually likely the case. This presents another layer but of a political nature, much more serious than this one incident below in the video, if it’s the case. It means that like The SPLC or its Canadian branch, The Anti Hate network, they may pay hate groups in order to achieve reduction of liberties for the people in the name of combatting the groups they hire.

2. The Rebel tracks a case of an illegal Halal slaughterhouse in Ontario. How this case is handled is also indicative of equality before the law in Ontario, if not Canada. There is some redundancy in the video but near the end when they interview a plaintiff, you get additional information.

3. Some of you may remember a conference last year that was abominable that took place somewhere in or around Toronto. There were slightly veiled calls for genocide of the Jewish people if memory serves, where a slide was shown that called for as Jew-Free-Canada. There was also, and more to the point, more overt discussions about how to take over Canada and make it an Islamic and sharia based society. (Please forgive the redundancy but most people still do not understand that Islam = Sharia and sharia = Islam and there is no distinction whatsoever between these two things. They are NOT equivalents to Catholic or Jewish laws for their own communities which get applied to whatever degree the individuals in the community wish for themselves) Another conference more overtly about Islamic conquest of Canada was cancelled last year, but with a little rebranding and a once-removed strategy for speakers, it is happening again next week.

On Oct. 10th there is another conference planned for Toronto on the same theme, but the wording has been softened to get past any attempt to cancel the event, as it was last time.

‘From the Masjid to City Hall’: Muslims from the US Are Coming to Canada to Teach Muslims in Canada How to Take Political Power

On October 10, 2026, the Hilton Toronto Markham will host a training session. The trainers are Muslim elected officials from the United States. The trainees are Muslims in Canada. The subject is how to capture political power for Islamic interests.

The session is called “From the Masjid to City Hall”. The convention is the 24th Annual UMAA Convention, organized by the Universal Muslim Association of America, a Shia Muslim NGO with consultative status at the United Nations. The theme: “The Next Chapter: From Identity to Impact.”

Last year’s convention focused on narrative and identity: how Shia communities are perceived. This year’s focus is impact: obtaining power inside public institutions. The shift is stated explicitly. “The Global Shia Narrative: Identity, Challenges, and Opportunities” has become “From Identity to Impact.” The mosque is the base. City hall is the target.

4. No idea if this is true or not. But even if it’s totally scripted, the main aspect is true. Western states masquerading as governments, are importing massive amounts of hostile Muslim and African males for the purpose of destabilizing and deracinating all inheritors of Greco-Roman civilization.

5. There is not nearly enough information about this event in this Tweet. Hopefully some of you fine readers can paste recent updates and something approximating truth into the comments on this one.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

 

Reader’s Links for October 2, 2026

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Reader’s Links for October 1st, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Multiculturalism is an oxymoron – 5 data points to illustrate the point: Links 1 for September 30, 2026

Posted on by — 11 Comments ↓

1. Israeli officials say diverted flydubai incident may be attempted ‘terror attack’

JERUSALEM, Sept 30 (Reuters) – The Israeli government believes an incident on a flight from the United Arab Emirates to Israel, which diverted ?to Saudi Arabia after transmitting emergency signals on Wednesday, may have been an attempted “terror attack” by one of the pilots, according to two Israeli officials.
The two Israeli officials said the co-pilot was believed to have stabbed the captain before cabin crew entered the cockpit and took control of the plane. An Israeli official had earlier told Reuters the plane transmitted the emergency signals after the pilots got into a physical altercation with each other.

Around the time the plane landed in Saudi Arabia, Doron ?Spielman, a spokesperson for the Israeli prime minister’s office, told Reuters the incident was not believed to have been a hijacking, describing it as a “different incident”.

Gonna add a comment here. Culture matters. The hubris of the west combined with very calculated dialectical tactics, leads us to believe that all cultures have the same basic values, which curiously makes the demanded concept of multiculturalism, which is an actual oxymoron in any case, totally pointless. Cultures are different at core levels that people steeped in their own, and not exposed to others, cannot understand. Frankly, most people cannot understand other cultures even when presented with the evidence of different core values, preferring instead to image that the individuals behaving in a certain way are criminals or extremists of some kind. Of course even they never ask themselves the question, ‘extremists of what?’. If they are extremists then they are extreme of their own culture. Extremist Jains, as Sam Harris likes to use as an illustration, will filter their water so as not to kill microbes in it.

Islam believes that Islam itself is so sacred as a practice and an instruction set, that individual believers are encouraged to murder people if those people are a threat to Islamic supremacy and authority. Which means disobeying any of the precepts of Islam. This would mean that a religious Muslim co-pilot could easily justify to himself murdering a pilot that was brining a plane load of people to Israel.

It is also a great reason never to hire religious Muslim pilots. And this is far far from the first time anything like this has happened. There was a famous case of an Egyptian pilot that slammed his aircraft into the ocean on purpose while chanting Allah hu Ackbar. This was well before 911 so no one in the West had worked out his actual motive.The report on it is delightfully anachronistic by today’s standards, as today anyone who read about the incident would get it before they got to the second page.

Longer and more detailed video here.

2. Beyond the Belleville shooting up of a Synagogue and the attempted murder of a police officer there to protect it recently, it seems as if there has been several more attacks and attempts at Jewish institutions in and around Ontario. I wish I had enough hard data to support my working hypothesis into a theory about this. But let me just drop an isolated fact into the mix here. Not all that long ago, Ezra Levant of The Rebel accused Jeremy MacKenzie of being “an op”. This means that he accused this man, a leader of initially Diagalon, and then and now, Second Sons, of actually being an agent of one or another government services. MacKenzie, who is quite litigious, took him to court, and the judge agreed that Levant had enough evidence to reasonably assert that the Second Sons leader was indeed a federal agent of some kind. Just mentioning this in case it stimulates any ideas leading up to the various municipal elections taking place across Canada in October.

Whitby man, 19, accused of threatening to shoot up synagogue in Durham Region

News of arrest came less than 24 hours after shoutout near Belleville synagogue that left police officer seriously hurt

A 19-year-old Whitby man has been charged after allegedly making threats online to shoot at a synagogue in Durham Region.

WARMINGTON: Waterloo Region latest community probing alleged threats against Jews

Arrest of 33-year-old Kitchener man has allegedly prevented third serious threat against Ontario’s Jews in less than two weeks

Three incidents of threats being made against Ontario’s Jewish community in less than two weeks would not be tolerated if any other group was being targeted. It should not be tolerated here either.

Not even including a number of others here like this Islamic State plot in Quebec. This looks like a bona fide Muslim doing Islam as prescribed.

3. Another important example of disinformation intended to destroy people’s ability to know what’s real as a secondary effect, and primarily to get people to not believe genuine reports of this exact behaviour.

First, the disinformation video:

Note that there is zero evidence in the clip for the claim. This could be about anything. Something personal or a behaviour that had the guy ejected from the location. Anyone checking it, which is woefully few, would dismiss it outright and therefore, dismiss other claims that are on topic but true. We saw this kind of disinformation attack constantly during Covid. One of the principle instigators was a suddenly massively popular Rumble ‘show host’ out of nowhere and is now again nowhere. He would have on real scientists and doctors and in between, have people spreading insane narratives about dead people who had bluetooth networks in their blood created by the Covid shots, thereby negating the real claims by valid doctors and scientists. We are indeed in an age of information warfare. After all, communism is nothing but dialectics, and that is what we are drawing your attention to here.

There is a real case that happened recently in the UK that is important though. A Sikh named Harman Singh Kapoor had a restaurant in England and elected not to sell Halal food. He even had a sign that said he didn’t have halal, to save people the time and trouble of asking. He was arrested for his efforts.

4. This however is an accurate juxtaposition of how a former ISIS commander (former leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). Before that he was known as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani and headed Jabhat al-Nusra, the Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria. He fought in Iraq after 2003 with groups that later became part of ISIS, but he split from ISIS/Baghdadi) who directly or indirectly is responsible for the atrocities in the Tweet, was indeed honoured at the UN.

5. In a communist country, as we saw in a previous item on not serving halal food, enforcing the actual law of the land and protecting your own family or people will be treated as a crime.

Paul Weston adds this in a follow up Tweet

Having spent a year in prison he could then be found innocent of the second charge. This is how a threat to treacherous and tyrannical government can be dealt with. Jailed for a year BEFORE being found innocent / guilty of anything. It is a monstrous injustice but short of storming the Bastille there is nothing we can do about Labour Party totalitarianism

Thank you all for checking out this site.

I beg all Canadians and Americans to watch this video. For the rest of the West, it’s too late. Don’t bother. But for Canadians and Americans, this is proof-positive of the communist nature and ending of rule of law in Canada.

Reader’s Links for September 30th, 2026

Posted on by — 10 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.