Tonight is the first ever Freedom Day Eve for Canada

Today is the first anniversary of the evening before the Freedom Convoy officially started in Ottawa, which was on January 29th

In fact, there was already many people in front of the Hill and around the area of Parliament even a few days in advance. But on the evening before the 29th, the atmosphere was set. Hope. Pride. Connection between Canadians and while it included all people from whatever subgroup they identified with, I think the connection between people from Quebec and all other provinces was never stronger than it was those three weeks.

There is nothing like a tyrant to unite all his victims.

Below a few of the videos we shot on January 28th. I wonder if this inspires the same powerful feelings of love, hope and connection that it brings to me when I watch them, and certainly when i was there shooting these videos.

One thing is for sure. Someday, the forces of genuine liberalism might win. Freedom and individual rights and the right and ability to maintain those rights within boundaries like national borders could be restored. Of course with that, must come the right for individuals to protect themselves from criminals and even governments with the use of force, and force multipliers.

But Freedom day, and Freedom Day Eve, must always be maintained by the people and never government. The fight against tyranny is a fight against a state that has run amok. And if freedom is to be preserved, it must be preserved by remembering and understanding the rights of the individual and what threatens those rights. And when governments take over celebrations, rituals and culture, you get what we have today.

I hope that every year, Freedom day and Freedom Day eve, is always celebrated by the people. And serves as a reminder to government that there are limits to what they can make us do, and stop us from doing.

War on Christmas and repressive tolerance

Johnny U posted a worthy oped from the Washington Times in a much appreciated comment he left at Vlad this morning.

Thank you John, for that and for all your contributions to this site.

The OpEd is about the war on Christmas being in fact about a war on America. This is of course true. But the author went to war and left his guns, uniform and C rations at home. While he noticed that there seems to be, shall we say, inequities in how Christmas is treated by the left and left influenced institutions, he didn’t offer any understanding as to why.

I would like to post my response to that comment here, and with an additional example beyond the response to the comment.

Anyone reading that article should aquaint themselves with the concept of “Repressive Tolerance”.

This, if memory serves, is a Frankfurt School Marxist based tactic.

One uses the concept of tolerance to try and get people to deconstruct all their own traditions and concepts and culture in order to show tolerance to others, while promoting all the others at the expense of your own.

The author of the Washington Times article described the effects quite well, even if he left out the best examples of it and showed lack of awareness as to its strategic origins and nature.

In terms of examples, I would point out that while we are increasingly no longer allowed to acknowledge Christmas, disapproving of women in burkas is a hate crime and closer and closer to a criminal offence every day.

This is Repressive Tolerance at work.

A few years ago, we subtitled a series of videos by a Polish academic on Marxism where he covers this concept. But it is dense and not fun watching even if it is very important and explains a lot. Much like Stephen Coughlin. In fact, Maj. Coughlin actually used those videos in some of his writing and briefs.

But here is James Lindsay, (the Prof. who busted the whole peer-review process with the publication of his phoney essay on “Rape Culture at a Dog Park”) demonstrates how repressive tolerance was devised and is used.

Ultimately, one uses tolerance to do two things.

Move the culture ever leftwards

Be maximally destructive to Western Civilization.

Subsequent to writing this response to Johnny, an example of same leapt to my attention on my phone. Almost as if Google was carefully tracking my interests.

Here is the aforementioned Polish academic explaining how Marxism uses homosexuality as a destructive force on Western civilization

(Actually it’s about much more than that, and worth every second of the 13:42 it lasts.)

Now in case anyone gets the idea that you can beat this thing by simply not going to see crappy commie themed movies like the one she refrences, let’s stop and think about what a social credit score and CBDC actually means. If you don’t go and see whatever propaganda is put out before you, and pay for it with what means you have, you just might get turned down for that critical loan or other item you need for yourself, your business or your family. Hell you may not even be able to see your family.

For that matter, you may not be able to access what you thought of as ‘your own money’. I think a few hundred truckers and people who contributed small amounts to a legal protest over removal of basic civil liberties in Ottawa may be able to see how that can happen.

And if anyone still thinks that the scenario I just described is too far out to be true, you simply have not been paying attention for the past twenty years. Even the last three.

Has Trudeau been planning for CBDC since before 2018?

We posted an amazing video last month on the true nature of CBDCs, or “Central Bank Digital Currencies”. The video in wonderfully simple terms lays out how digital currency can work, and therefore likely will. Government rarely takes on powers without using them, and then abusing them. What starts with an outwardly noble goal for the betterment of ‘society’ rapidly becomes an Orwellian nightmare.

Thinking about that video, as I do often, reminded me of two events since Trudeau became Führer.

One was how in 2018, Trudeau via Stats-Can, explained that without Canadian’s knowledge or consent, banks had been told to collect all data, non-anonymized to be perfectly clear, on half a million Canadians. This would mean all cash withdrawals, all credit card purchases, all deposits and related information and all this tied to your name, address and anything else the bank has on file about you. This was unprecedented. Stats can would usually use anonymized collected data on a cohort of Canadians without knowing which account did what. This however, was personal.

In the video below, Trudeau explains in his usual slight-of-hand way, that the non-anonymized data would never be available to the public. That is already pretty funny since Government data bases are hacked all the time. Just ask China, who usually does most of it. But he doesn’t deny that the data submitted under this program to stats-can would contain names, addresses and specifics of the people and their transactions.

I asked a branch manager about this and she contradicted the video below, which claims that banks had to volunteer the data. She said that if the government asked for this data they would have to comply. She called head office to confirm. This shows that the banks have been an arm of government for some time already, and not just when they froze accounts of contributors to the Freedom Convoy.

Thanks to an alleged banklash about this, the government claimed it would not do the program. Which almost certainly means they did the program and didn’t tell the public. After all, part of the actual plan for Stats-Can, was to not tell the 500,000 that were chosen to be watched, that they were being watched, collected, and sent to the government. So not telling the public that this was happening at all is a very small step from what was announced in the first place.

Then there was the bank account freeze from February 2022 connected with the trucker convoy.

To be clear: Although it is getting harder to find online, the banks at the behest of Trudeau did indeed freeze bank accounts of small business in Canada that contributed small sums to the freedom convoy when it was a fully legal effort. I spoke with an ice-cream shop owner personally who had their accounts frozen, and not in a delicious way, and then were doxxed by an ANONYMOUS hacker who supplied the information to the Trudeau government and somehow it found its way to the press. I was recently informed by a trusted source that this ANON hacker was either working for the FBI then, or does now.

The Press then sent out emails to people who had been doxxed in this fashion, from hacked data, not leaked; threatening them in the MSM/CBC sort of way that they had a certain amount of time to contact them before a story got written on them and how they contributed to whatever string of horrible adjectives they planned to use to describe the Freedom Convoy.

As an aside, what the FBI/Trudeau/CBC/CTV/Global news people did, is what Julian Assange is in jail for. Assange himself though, is not guilty of it as he used leaked data and not hacked.

The following tweet has text from the Washington Post which is nearly identical to emails sent to people we know personally but from Canadian enemy propaganda sites such as CBC and Global.

“Leaked”. Right. They know it’s a crime to use hacked data this way. So they just lied about how it was obtained.

Also as an aside, the term, “Occupation” (which is the rhetorical weapon of choice by enemies of freedom used to describe the protest by Canadians against the illegal and unconstitutional vaccine and travel mandates), means an armed invasion of foreign nationals who take and hold an area. The Freedom Convoy was 100% unarmed as we are learning from the inquiry in Ottawa (a kind of equivalent of the January 6th hearings) and was made up entirely of Canadian citizens.

Back to the point although granted, it takes a tow-truck to get me to do that often:

Trudeau has had dalliances with abuse of people’s finances, bank account and other personal information which could mean preparation for the launch of CBDCs. This is the ultimate slave-chain. With CBDCs the whole world is a gulag and the rules and limits can and will change moment to moment, and there will always be a collectivist reason for it, that probably most will prefer to believe rather than accept the reality of what has been done to them.

Eyes wide open please. Watch for signs of the elimination of cash.

 

Lived Experience explained

This is a timely lesson in Marxist rhetorical weapons. As it happens, there is a dialectic attack on the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa taking place now by a group of Trudeau Foundation flunkies and far left wing activists calling itself “The People’s Commission on the Occupation” or something very much like that. They are in no small part using this exact device to try and crush the actual experience of tens of thousands of people at the Convoy, including the witnesses at their own hearings, in favour of people who hate and fear the convoy, even who did not experience it first hand.

So take note of this. It may come in handy when the materials on the mock trials are posted.

I should add that I believe the person who made the video above, as well as the excellent video on dialectics which we posted here several days ago, are done by one of the Three Professors who demonstrated how staggeringly broken the “peer review” process is, by submitting and having approved a series of ludicrous papers made up of whole cloth with no basis in reality at all.

One paper, the only one I vaguely remember, had something to do with rape culture in dogs parks. By dogs.

 

 

The video of German pathologists and claims for what is in the mRNA shots

A few days ago, we posted a link to a gates of Vienna which had this video as its feature. We wrote up our own explanation of why it should be viewed in more than one way. At face value, but also as a potential weapon of information warfare to move people incrementally away from what is true, to what is not, in order to protect those who profit by what is true and do not want us to know, be certain of, or act on those truths.

Here is the video with both the RAIR write up, and our own for what we hope is a gestalt of it.

France sees increasing danger to all teachers who fail to toe Islamic-socialist ideology

The West needs to pay close attention to these events. At this point its surprising that France at least even pays lip service to its own culture and values by offering these teachers protection. In Canada and the US I think we know what would happen to them. And this circumstance will happen more and more often, assuming there are any teachers left willing to stand up for Greek thought, Western values and freedom of conscience and speech.

Please read the whole story and details over at RAIR Foundation

On the current acceptability of actual science in our postmodern societal rules

 Academic paper on evolution flushed down the memory hole.

To understand the enormity of the importance of this article, I once again refer to the (probably soon to be illegal) excellent documentary, Dogs Decoded. Pay special attention to how the Soviet Union treated actual science, especially evolutionary biology, that contradicted Marxism’s axioms.

Especially the segment on Silver Fox bred in the barn for domesticity or aggression. This renegade experiment, while illegal in all ways in the Soviet Union has been invaluable ever since for real science in the understanding of certain attributes which we can loosely call, domestication. This article may be experiencing a less blunt force train of events than the Russian experiment on Silver Fox, but for the precise same reason our Russian evolutionary-biologist had to hide his intentions and methods from the government. But the subtle and frankly, pure Postmodernist way in which it was done is in fact far more effective in preventing the work from reaching academic circles.

The only thing it can use for potential exposure is the Streisand effect, which of course is why I link to it here. And the fact that it appears here, will be used as an excuse as to why they believed that this truth must not be known. And the great truth that is so scary?

Men and women are biologically different in general.

Here is an excellent video on this subject of the state of academia today:

Remember this moment from a James Damore discussion?

 

 

 

Important update added: Trudeau makes his most concerning comment yet on his form of governance

Please see this correction to the translation that was sent in today for this video above:

at 1:33   it is the journalist that says affirmatively  :  “… écouter aussi évidemment… ” 
the nuance here would be …” but evidently you will also have to listen to what those are saying, don’t you ? “
 
the “dont’ you ? “part is not expressed by words but by the intonation 
and to that trudeau answers “… oui , mais surveiller “
and  that would be   ” yes … but to monitor (them) ” 

If that isn’t clear, lets look at these clips to add mental context:

I think this is actually 2016…

Here is a popular Quebec TV host discussing this newest shove to Orwell out of Trudeau’s mouth:

A German Father: “I Am A ‘Concerned Citizen’. Go Ahead, Ridicule Me.”

Preface: “Concerned Citizen”, besorgter Bürger, is a recent, sarcastic pejorative for people who criticize the government’s “refugee” policies, implying that only losers would be concerned. Example: “I wonder if Germany can handle that many migrants” – “Haha, look at this concerned citizen!”

An original translation from Achse des Guten.

I am one of them. A concerned citizen. Now go ahead, ridicule me.

Thilo Schneider
I have a 19-year-old daughter. She is, in my opinion, a pretty and ambitious girl, funny and sensitive. Back then, 36 months ago, I did not care if she went to town or to a club, on her own or with a friend. I thought it was cool when she and her girlfriends took the train to visit other major German towns, maybe party. She is young, full of life, it is her bloody right to explore the world.

These times are over. I am worried. I have lost faith in the state protecting her and her girlfriends when I’m not there. I lost trust that the people she will meet will respect her dignity and her integrity. I am worried for her. I don’t want to constrain her, but I lose sleep when she’s not home. We did not read for her at bedtime, and we did not do math homework with her, so that some asshole from some weird country gropes her because, in his eyes, she is an “unbeliever slut” and “worthless”. And I don’t trust that anyone will help her if she is in duress. After all, she is “only” a “German”.

I am aware that there are also filthy pigs among those “who have been living here for a bit longer” [Merkel’s recent expression to avoid the word “Germans”], who can’t keep their hands off others, but in my opinion, this is not an argument to invite people in, sort of as a “compensation”, who have a — let’s say “conservative” — view of women, and where our state isn’t even interested in who they are, how old they are, and what they are up to.

I am sorry that she can’t grow up in the same free country that I grew up in. I am sorry that she can’t go to a swimming pool without taking care, without constantly being on the lookout for whether trouble is imminent, and without keeping “an arm’s length distance”. As if anyone whose entrance ticket I subsidize with my tax money would care. Thank you to those who opened the flood gates without examining who is coming in. I imagine that neither I, nor my children deserved this.

Perfect target for “the new arrivals”
My son was beaten up by Russians. Just because. Because they could. He did not fight back, to prevent worse. He was right. There is no point in resisting. Our children were not raised in, and for, violence. This makes them, when the state fails, perfect targets for the “new arrivals”. The “integration industry”, which battens itself at the public trough, does not even watch in indifference. They watch as appeasers, insulting and downplaying, spitting on the victims of the collateral damage of their protégés who allegedly “seek refuge”.

We spend Christmas behind concrete barriers, the controls at concerts are stricter than at the airport. And, yes: some districts with predominantly newly arrived inhabitants are now filthy and dirty and not a good place to live. Because it is the people living there who lack any consideration and respect for other people’s property, because they have completely different challenges and desires.

They have no obligation to the greater common good outside their own family and clan. And those zones are under the rule of the relevant clans. And they behave accordingly. They hate me, and the country that reached out to them when they were in need. They still like to take our monthly welfare cheques.

And I am getting older and wondering where I can find affordable living, where I won’t have to dwell under threat for life and limb. Yes, I am concerned. I am a concerned citizen. Now go ahead and ridicule me.

EU Seeks Methods To Implement New Level Of Censorship

An original translation from the blog of Vera Lengsfeld.

EU-Commission Plans The Final Solution To “Disinformation On The Internet”

Guest author Hanno Vollenweider

There are growing concerns in Brussels over the disinformation of the citizens over the internet. That is why an “expert group” of researchers, journalists and the representatives of platforms is meeting in Brussels, and will finally present suggestions for a final solution of avoiding disinformation on the internet to the EU commission.

„Since the election of Donald Trump as the president of the USA at the end of 2016, there are increasing worries in Europe that fake news on the internet might drastically manipulate public debate. The EU commission therefore wants to take measures against fake news, and, for this purpose, has summoned a group of experts from the sciences, and representatives of the media industry and platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter. This ‘High Level Group’ will submit suggestions for fighting fake news on the internet until summer, write Netzpolitik.org on their website about the plans of the Eurocrats. One does not need particular skills in reading between the lines to understand what this means: The electoral success of Trump was only possible because he had a large voting base who had lost their trust in mainstream media, and who were looking for “alternative” information on the web, far away from anti Trump campaigns. This must not happen in Europe! Just imagine how Eurocracy might end, if the people in Europe were no longer to listen to the soothing mainstream media.

In the German sphere, the so-called “alternative media” are on the march, while “long-established” magazines like Bild, Spiegel, Stern, Focus, etc., keep losing readers. The reason is simple: their unconditional courting of the Merkel regime.

So many of the positive news about the mass migration was such a brazen pack of lies that it was insulting to the readers’ intelligence. This is taking vengeance now, and will probably not be reversibly easily.

And exactly that is the reason why there now will be a political interference. What is particularly telling is that, no matter what the committee of experts will suggest to the EU commission in the end, we will never know, because it has been ordered from the highest place that all documents will remain secret.

There is a reason for that.

There are two suggestions at the moment:

– So-called “Fake News” will be outright banned, and the operators of social networks, servers, alternative websites and other platforms will be required by law to completely delete content. You can imagine who will define what is “fake news” and what is not.

– The competitors of the “Fake News”, in other words, mainstream media, will be made more visible, by
promoting the news that is, in the opinion of the EU, more credible. Additionally, the awareness of “Fake News” will have to be increased by training, for example in schools.

All this reeks of censorship, cooptation (Gleichschaltung) and reeducation, and should be fought sternly before it comes into effect.

Do not rely on politicians, become active! Send news from alternative media per email to friends, educate your friends and family about the possibilities to receive news outside the mainstream media! Beat the Eurocrats by warning as many people as possible about the “reeducation” through these so-called “educational measures”.

Translator’s note:
Read the original EU statement here. It is pretty clear where it is truly aiming:
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/ansip/announcements/statement-vice-president-ansip-european-parliament-strasbourg-plenary-debate-hate-speech-populism_en