Category Archives: Islam

Belated minimalist post on trying to stop a mosque in Texas

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

It’s been extremely busy here for a couple of days.

Most guys like watching sports. I have tried it many times now and again over the years and could never find the excitement in it other guys have. This doesn’t mean I disrespect them, or minimize their importance. I have just barely enough wisdom to know that what is and is not important does not revolve around my personal preferences.

But last night I totally got it. I really, really love watching intense school board or city planning debates when it comes to the narrative Vs. counter-narrative arguments. It feels exciting. A team sport where the left or the Muslims have an objective, and a serious one, a consequential one and the rest of us are trying to stop them and establish reality and individual rights back into the net.

I have been doing a lot of that the last few days. Watching, cutting, subtitling and branding. Some of the speeches were amazing.

There are too many to post tonight. But for sure a couple of them, and by no means the best necessarily, but exciting ones I’lll put below. These are from a McKinney planning council in Texas for a new major mosque and Islamic beachhead which has no business to be built in the US by any number of metrics. The plans where deceptive, they don’t have the requisite parking, hell I have watched over 100 of these videos where the majority explained why this mosque cannot and must not be built. But here are a couple of them.

Notice the guy behind her who is so intense you think he may burst.

Here’s why. And yeah, I know how he feels.

Much more to come. In the meantime, another Ben Bankas clip about Canada.

Gotta say, he has guts to do these shows in Carneytopia after all those bills have passed.

 

Reader’s Links for August 5th, 2026

Posted on by — 9 Comments ↓

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Interview with Dr. Andrew Bostom: How Islamophobia is used to decide exactly how much and what kind of attention a crime will get (real world example)

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Article at RAIR

Government agencies and the liquification of reality: Links 1 for Aug. 1, 2026

Posted on by — 8 Comments ↓

1. The only thing surprising about this post is that CTV News appears to have made at least an attempt at a kind of samizdat to tell the truth about the event. Which is frankly the real news here. That a Network Canadian news program attempted to deliver real information during a news broadcast that might help shape people’s opinions and ability to make decisions for themselves.

On a report about a stabbing in an Ottawa park they actually show the demographic most likely responsible for the stabbing at the 47 second mark and again once later for a second.

2. The obvious story is Spain. Many headlines have said in the past years, “Spain has fallen” and other headlines that don’t leave a lot of room for what was coming. Now though, could be a decent time for headlines like that.

Someone’s 33 minute documentary on the invasion of Spain. No idea if it’s good yet. Will watch tomorrow. But in case anyone wants to first, here it is.

3. 30 year old SNL sketch on the Trans-movement that would probably get them kicked off the air now. As an aside, this doctor portrayed in the Sketch is not that far from the reality of Drs. John Money and Anke Ehrhardt, and their colleague, Dr. Howard W. Jones Jr. Now of course they would be fat rich and semi celebrities for their Dr. Mengele like work on the premise of Feminist theories on “gender identity”.

3. Woman who wins Irish women’s beauty contest is a Somali, sufficiently Islamic as to not allow a single hair to be seen.

How can anyone say these things are not lines of effort to deracinate Western cultures and nation states?

4. Video on mass migration into France. From our PoV, the only value of the video below is that it is again, a rough, grotesquely understated colour commentary on what is going on in France, also failing to note that it’s going on everywhere, and failing to notice or mention the reason behind the “debate” on the side of the continued destruction of, in this case France, but clearly the West. the video on the Irish contest at least provides better data points for the reality of what is taking place. Look, it isn’t really even worth watching the video below. But if you want to see what controlled opposition looks like in terms of making sure you do nothing because others are observing the same surface level effects of the underlying cancers of leftism and Islam that is destroying Western Civilization in every conceivable attribute that defines it, watch it. And no, it isn’t just because we find layered arpeggiated piano music to add drama annoying as hell under fact based videos. But yeah that does add a data point to this being propaganda of one sort or another.

5. Tim Horton’s manages to navigate around cancel culture to do a promotion of a Harry Potter themed event. Below is the Rebel news video on it. Of course, the entire thing is framed around the author of Harry Potter’s books being in favour of women’s rights, which has been dialectically negated by the Trans-line-of-Operation. In other words, if you look at Marxism’s feminist lines of efforts, and each subsequent expansion of that effort such that it negates the previous one, you can see how feminists using critical theory attacks, first used oppressor oppressed narratives to destroy men and the family, and over a few feminist “waves” (Lines of Operation) they are negating women by forcing the idea that a man who says he is a woman is a real women and must be affirmed by all as such, and to not do so is a criminal offence. Certainly in Canada. 4th wave feminism asserts there is no biological reality, and to assert that there is, is a hate crime. This is how Jordan Peterson became famous in the first place. He refused to submit to the law which forces people to use the ‘gender’ pronoun of any individual who may have weaponized their self-perception such that it threatens everyone they interact with. Compelled speech, he rightly asserted, was the stuff of more than the Soviet Union, as they only demanded you could not say things that are true. (One might argue that clapping till you pass out or suffer a stroke or heart attack after a Stalin speech could be called compelled speech though.)

We have all seen many videos of large men with some sort of indicator that they think they are women flipping out or even being violent with store clerks who might have said “Sir” to them. This also being a perfect example of the leftist tactic of provoke a reaction from a sane person and then weaponize the reaction against them till everyone submits to the 2+2=5 which we must all come to accept about everything in our day to day experience. This is true for each and every line of Effort from feminism, of which the trans-movement is a subset, to Global Warming, to Amer-Indian children buried-not-buried near residential schools, (Themselves a progressive idea) And of course a dozen I can’t remember off the top of my head and of course, the dozen more to come until there is nothing left of reality at all except a stain on your shoe you have to hope the thugs who the state hires to replace police don’t notice.

Here is a great recent example of the inversion and liquification of reality by the state in Canada. In this video by the Rebel, we learn that statistics Canada now requires men who identify as women and commit crimes to be counted as women committing crimes. This of course is the destruction of reality. At the same time, many police forces will not keep accurate race-based crime statistics, which is the avoidance of reality. The two together of course create a completely false picture, and create another rot in the foundation of civilization. Which clearly is what it is meant to do. Police must record the false, and not record the real. As an additional proof of the thesis, “hate-crimes” race based stats is recorded. So its OK when it supports narrative.

But then again, there is another possible reason for Tim Horton’s stance. It could be somewhat principled as the Rebel points out, and that would be great. But what principle exactly.

We should be happy at the fact that Ottawa’s major school board, the OCDSB has decided not to send teachers and students to one of a number of ‘pride’ parades this year with an obviously transparent excuse, not a reason but an excuse, that would have applied equally every other year. This year the claim that the parades are outside the school year was enough to get them to cancel. Except the likely real reason was Islamic pressure on the school board.

At least in part, it is likely the reason that Ontario schools have dropped music programs to a huge degree. Music is among the ten most forbidden things in Islam. And Muslims, almost uniquely find it not enough to observe sharia themselves, but it must be forced by blunt force, or by increments and deception on to everyone.

 

At the end of the day, all roads lead to Pyongyang. Or London as the case may be.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

Another Islamic attack, this time in Paris

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Before watching the video on the current Paris attack, please consider reading this article from RAIR Foundation, about why RAIR, will never (and none of us should ever) use the term, “Islamist”. It is way overdue, for someone to say and explain this out lout. gratitude to RAIR for doing it so well.

 

RAIR also has a write up on the Paris attack here. 

Diana West on grand scale arson for politics, and reality checks for LGBTQ: Links 1 for July 26, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

1. Diana West: About them there forest fires:

She asks, Is this Fire Jihad?

It is probably climate engineering that has turned forests into tinder, and disrupted the hydrological (and every other) weather cycle; but what about the arsonists on the ground?

About those fires — the likes of which, from Lahaina, to Pacific Palisades, to Canada, to France, Spain, Italy and beyond, we have no memory of; and about those fire phenomena, from their so-called “pyrocumulus” clouds, “heat domes” and continent-wide smoke contamination, which we have no history of — who is setting them? This is a logical question when arson appears to be playing a role in these conflagrations, albeit a role usually drowned out in a firehose of “climate change” stories.

Take Spain —

Please read the rest at Diana’s Substack

This is a meaningful addition to that post of Diana’s from THIRTEEN YEARS AGO

2. Reality Vs. Marxist dialectics from a movie star vs reality check

Reality:

 

Marxist lecturing by a rich famous beautiful movie star:

 

Reality check:

When a reality check, even a deadly one, has no impact on your views:

3. “British woman got a longer prison sentence for a social media post than these two attempted rapists and possibly worse:

It is clearly time to re think how you do things Western legacy people.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

Now reporting on illegal entrants to the west’s crimes are less important than reporting on the enforcement and judicial operations to encourage those crimes, Also Elon Musk and the viral clip: Links 1 for June 25, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

1. There is a wildly viral clip you have all seen by now with Elon Musk and a leftist propagandist from The Economist, where he schools her on one of the more common dialectical weapons used for the past few decades. That would be the one where the left calls anyone with normal, healthy views, “far Right” often with the term extremists added to it.
Elon tells her off rather well.

We have a few things to add. Firstly, in the very unlikely event that Elon rever  eads this site, he should know that one never ever does an interview with enemy propaganda without filming it yourself separately, either overtly or covertly. I have to say that one of the people who really did understand this was British lawyer com jihadi, Anjem Choudary (also known as Abu Luqman). I really appreciated his videos as he was the first English jihadi leader who actually just told the truth about Islam and its intentions and beliefs. Frankly at one point I thought he was an op of some kind as he didnt use the initiate language of islam or any of the forms of deception classical fiqh recommends for such cases. But I noticed that in all his interviews he did with anyone, he had one or more cameras on tripods running in the room himself. Had Musk done that, he wouldn’t have had to say, “Leave that part in” hoping they would but knowing he had no power. Instead, he could have published it separately afterwards had they edited it out, doing vastly more good of exposing the leftist media than the way he did it.

It always annoyed me that our side just didn’t learn that simple lesson and as a consequence, we became edited into tools of enemy propaganda.

I havent seen the entire interview yet, but from the few minutes I did see, it was the same as many British and Canadian legacy journalists interviewing prominent non-leftists. In no way was it an interview, where the purpose is to get the subject to explain their views or area of expertise. What it was, from the few minutes I saw, was a series of dialectic attacks using terms that are initiate, to put it mildly, or that automatically direct the belief in the viewer, and usually also the subject the wrong way. Here is the whole interview for context. But in the now famous clip, Elon rightly straightens her out on the critical theory attack phrase of “The far right”.

Skipping around you hear a parade of these kinds of terms, And we here at Vlad Tepes view these terms as one of the enemy’s most potent weapons. IF we had the time and money, making a small dictionary to remind people of what the words used to mean, or how they are used today, or what new terms really mean in fact and effect would be a worthwhile project.

A couple of examples while we are on it. NEVER use the word God, for Allah. It immediately disarms the listener and puts them in a position where they logically should defend Islam. But a thing, real or imagined is defined by its attributes. And calling Allah God is the same as calling Superman, Donald Duck. Or Zeuss, Thor. Or Hercules, Jesus. Or Cupid, Moloch. That last one is maybe the best analogy. At least in terms of distance of attributes.

Jordan Peterson faced an identical tactician on British Channel4 in the UK around 8 years ago.

2. In New York yesterday there was an Islamic jihad attack stabbing Jewish people.

Of course, in keeping with modern trends of publishing things in such a way as to avoid informing people, we don’t know if he is a convert, or born to a Muslim family but we are led to believe there is a mental health issue with the man who stabbed two people while yelling Allah Ackbar. At times like this we really need to read people like Dr. Thomas Szasz, The Myth of Mental Illness. But then again, it is always what Western media says after a Muslim wages jihad. Or, they blame it on a target of the left. Like when a Muslim in Montreal murdered many young engineering students at a girl’s school in Montreal, they gave him an Anglo name, Mark Lepine, and claimed the problem was male hatred of women, avoiding any mention of his Algerian Muslim father and a lifetime of propaganda about the rightful role of women.

The second issue is that frankly, like calling Muslim child-sex-slave gangs in the UK, “Asian”, they have taken a belief and made it into an actual racist issue. No Japanese people were or are involved in the UK (and many more locations) forced prostitution of child girls. Or Chinese as far as we know. But LOTS of Muslims who where not Asian were most certainly involved. In this case, they characterize the Mentally ill as people ready to go off and stab people yelling Allah Ackbar. Keep in mind that in Western mental hospitals, those who have identity issues and think they are Jesus, may walk around in sandals and a bedsheet blessing people and forgiving them. Those who think they are Mohammad would try and murder entire tribes of people and write about the rivers of blood on the streets. So the problem isnt so much mental illness, as who they are trying to emulate.

“Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith,

a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today)

and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. 

3. At this point, posting news stories about grotesque crimes and antisocial acts by Muslim and occasionally other illegal entrants to the UK and West in general, is not where the story lies. It actually is in how the judicial and enforcement systems themselves now operate as part of a larger machine to crush the legacy peoples and cultures that created the West as it is, and are the inheritors of Classical civilization, ranging from Israel to Rome and Greece. Bringing in people very likely to commit these acts, paying them to not have to do anything purposeful like learn a trade and actually become part of Western Civilization, and then when some of them inevitably commit atrocities, the publicity around the act will inevitably make them the victim and their victims the perp, framed sometimes in the Marxist Oppressor/Oppressed narrative, but sometimes as they are victims of mental illness in a society that doesn’t care about them and their victims are privileged. Meaning white people or Jews who actually work or have families. That being of course, just a minor variation of the Marxist method.

This story fits the theme very well. But is probably the tenth one I have seen this week, and that is without looking for them.

4. More on the same theme:

5. The public must learn to distrust the MS Media if it hopes to EVER understand the simplest things taking place around them.

Woman stabbed and set on fire inside Stuttgart shopping center

Police arrested a 54-year-old German national following a two-hour manhunt, but questions remain over whether the description refers to a German-born or a naturalized suspect

A 47-year-old woman was left fighting for her life on Thursday after she was repeatedly stabbed and then set on fire inside Stuttgart’s Milaneo shopping center.

Emergency calls began reaching police shortly after the mall opened at around 10:15 a.m. The victim, reportedly an employee at one of the stores, was rushed to the hospital with life-threatening injuries and underwent emergency surgery.

According to Bild, the suspected attacker fled the scene, prompting police to evacuate and seal off the shopping center while armed officers searched the complex. A helicopter was also deployed.

Officers arrested a 54-year-old man at approximately 12:10 p.m. in Stuttgart-Heumaden, several miles from the mall. Prosecutors said the suspect and victim were, or had previously been, in a relationship.

Investigators are reviewing surveillance footage and securing evidence as they attempt to establish the motive. Authorities said there was no continuing danger to the public, and the Milaneo later reopened.

I asked Grok for an update and yeah there is substantive information if you know what you are seeing. But only if you already know enough to know what is likely the case:

According to German police and media reports (including SWR, Stuttgarter Nachrichten, and others):The suspect is a 54-year-old man described as a German national (deutscher Staatsangehöriger).

He is the husband of the 47-year-old victim (or was in a relationship with her; later reports specify he attacked his wife).
The attack happened at her workplace — a food store in the basement of the Milaneo shopping center in Stuttgart — on the morning of 23 July 2026.
He repeatedly stabbed her with a knife and then set her on fire. She suffered life-threatening injuries and required emergency surgery.
He fled, was hunted for about two hours (including with a helicopter), and was arrested after members of the public spotted him on a city tram and alerted police.
A detention order was issued; he is in custody on suspicion of attempted murder.

No further personal details (birthplace, ethnicity, migration background, prior convictions, or mental-health history) have been officially released. German authorities often list naturalized citizens simply as “German nationals,” so it is not yet clear whether he was born in Germany or acquired citizenship later. Police explicitly said they are still operating under the previous disclosure rules.

No name for perp or background offered.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

I found this interview with comedian, Ben Bankas by Louder with Crowder to be quite interesting. Entertaining as well. Which is a nice combination.

This woman runs an interesting channel. She is a Mortician, and has a YouTube channel where she discusses her work and aspects of death. In a very non-offensive way actually. I am not aware if she mentions the white fibrin clots of the mRNA injected, but this one is about Jeffery Epstein and things that puzzled her about his death.

I would only add one thing.

There are only 2 reasons for a political assassination. 1. Obviously to get rid of a problem. But 2. To make sure everyone knows that it was a political assassination as a deterrent to anyone else who may be thinking of becoming a problem to the actor in question. The Clintons seem to have made their kills obvious in the same way. Like one Wikileaks whistleblower, Seth Rich, who was found killed in a DC suburb in Bloomingdale with a Gold Rolex on him, and a wallet full of cash and the official story was it was a robbery/mugging. His family hired a PI who openly stated that this was a political assassination and then the family fired him. Which I didn’t understand. Till I found out they had another son. In that context everything she says makes perfect sense.

Canadian/UK state apparatus and media retasked as communist dialectically operating orgs

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

The various ministries or departments of a republic are clearly intended to operate as per their title, to accumulate information or regulate industry for the benefit of the people within the parameters of their field and authority. The media was to make sure they did their task as designed and hold them accountable when they did not.

The communist revolution across the West has made these institutions into ones that operate, as one would expect, as they do in communist polities like the Soviet Union. Statistics Canada no longer collects important information in order to inform government policy and to let the public know what the facts are to see how they should vote in order to affect said policy, but to promote state narratives no matter how destructive they are. And, like all dialectical organizations, their very purpose is destruction. So the operation of the media and institutions of state is now destructive by design.

Here are two examples from Statistics Canada. One is obfuscating reality in order to have no idea about the truth of crime statistics whatsoever, and the other a promotional video celebrating the consequences of destructive state policy, namely mass immigration by hostile ideologies into Canada.

Both of those videos show that the agency is operating in the opposite manner that it was created for, and how people expect they still operate. It is too difficult a pill for most Canadians to understand this transformation however. Explaining it to them kindly, with patience and with enough evidence for any pre-communist court or actual scientific analysis to conclude this is the case, only makes them come to a slow boil rather than convince them.

Still, one has to try. The more they listen and absorb, the faster their own day-to-day experience will lead them to the truth of their senses. And it will be because of what you showed them, even if they don’t remember it, admit to it, or credit you. But we must do it.

Moving on to Health Canada:

This is a presentation at Parliament Hill on Oct. 25th 2025 by Shawn Buckley, a Constitutional lawyer who started and ran the National Citizens Inquiry which was the only forum for truth, or if truth is an uncomfortable word in the purest sense, the only venue for counter-narrative views and science during the Covid years.

In this presentation they discuss Health Canada’s newer regulations which prevent people from accessing effective health care.

Moving on to police/media complicity to enforce narrative. This has become so common that it feels like a potential insult to the reader to post examples. But it is very important to stay aware of the real nature of the media and state organs if one wishes to preserve ones’ sanity in these times.

Below, the ongoing narrative attack on Private property by the state, using the totem of abuse of Amer-Indian people. For those that don’t know, for months, flags were at half mast and the public was bombarded by state media on alleged graves of Amer-Indian children at residential schools, the evidence for such claims has never been demonstrated, and now there is talk of criminalizing requesting that evidence. This would be “Residential school denialism”. This fits into the Orwellian pattern the rest of this post is pointing to. More on that farther down.

In this clip, someone trotted out to be an Amer-Indian leader explains that they do not want the alleged bodies exhumed and they want them left right where they are, but they can just sense that they are there. This is where reality gives way to scientism, exactly as it did during Covid.

OK this is maybe marginally related. But the fact that she queued in to the destruction of the English Language with Orwell’s essay on Newspeak makes it worth putting here.

I think this was somewhere in the city still called, Toronto, but bearing no resemblance to a Canadian city of a few decades ago, an employee at a GoodLifeFitness gym followed her instructions to evict anyone displaying a weapon. She was promptly fired for it. Of course it was a Sikh. And as one might expect, his behaviour in the gym at least appears to have been deliberately provocative to create this exact scenario such that he has an easy payday ahead of him, and equality before the law gets dissolved a little bit more in the acid of dialectical multiculturalism.

I don’t know who this guy is, or what his deal is or his party is. But overall what he said is exactly right. I would take minor issue with some of his history, but in terms of the nature of these bills he references, yeah. It’s what he said. And yes, there is a configuration of these bills that can end with life in prison for thought crimes.

Today’s excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago. I would ask that all of you, Canadian, American, European if you can still even read this site (I get reports that many cannot) PLEASE read this little excerpt then search for videos on Canadian bills, C9. now law, C22, C8 and C 34 I think it is.

“Article 58 consisted of fourteen sections. In Section 1 we learn that any action (and, according to Article 6 of the Criminal Code, any absence of action) directed toward the weakening of state power was considered to be counterrevolutionary.

Broadly interpreted, this turned out to include the refusal of a prisoner in camp to work when in a state of starvation and exhaustion. Thls was a weakening of state power. And it was punished by execution. (The execution of malingerers during the war.)

From 1934 on, when we were given back the term Mother- land, subsections were inserted on treason to the Motherland- la, 1b, 1c, 1d. According to these subsections, all· actions directed against the military might of the U.S.S.R. were punishable by execution (lb), or by ten years’ imprisonment (la), but the lighter penalty was imposed only when mitigating circumstances were present and upon civilians only.

Broadly interpreted: when our soldiers were sentenced to only ten years for allowing themselves to be taken prisoner (action injurious to Soviet military might), this was humanitarian to the point of being illegal. According to the Stalinist code, they should all have been shot on their return home.

(Here is another example of broad interpretation. I remember well an encounter in the Butyrki in the summer of 1946.

A certain Pole had been born in Lemberg when that city was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Until World War II he lived in his native city, by then located in Poland; then he went to Austria, where he entered the service, and in 1945 he was arrested there by the Russians. Since by this time Austrian Lemberg had become Ukrainian Lvov, he received a tenner under Article 54-1a of the Ukrainian Criminal Code: i.e., for treason to his motherland, the Ukraine! And at his interrogation the poor fellow couldn’t prove that treason to the Ukraine had not been his purpose when he went to Vienna! And that’s how he conned his way into becoming a traitor.)

One important additional broadening of the section on reason was its application “via Article 19 of the Criminal Code”-“via intent.” In other words, no treason had taken place; but the interrogator envisioned an intention to betray and that was enough to justify a full term, the same as for actual treason. True, Article 19 proposes that there be no penalty for intent, but only for preparation, but given a dialectical reading one can understand intention as preparation. And “preparation is punished in the same way [i.e., with the ~_ame penalty] as the crime itself’ (Criminal Code). In general, “we draw no distinction between intention and the crime itself, and this is an instance of the superiority of Soviet legislation to bourgeois legislation.”

This section goes on for some time. But it is clear as day what it is speaking about. The rapid creation of a number of laws that were created specifically to be interpreted as broadly as possible such that the state can get anyone, at anytime, for anything.

And the top legal experts in Canada such as John Carpay and Bruce pardy have been VERY clear that the recent spate of laws passed in Canada, some of them WITHOUT DEBATE are written in exactly that way.

Many interviews are on this site with both experts.

Moving on to Transport Canada:

So this would be an example of the dialectical transformation of both Provincial, (in this case Ontario) and Federal regulatory bodies to make highways unsafe and trucking in particular a threat to transportation. There is simply no way that a school or schools like the ones issuing Potemkin licences to illegal, mostly Sikh migrants could possibly ever operate for 40 minutes without being shut down by police in a functional republic as Canada was not long ago. Think about each and every ticket you have had, showing licences and registration and insurance to police for a busted tail light or speeding a little over the limit. This MUST be by design.

Screenshot

Thank you all for checking out this site.

 

Did modern social engineers look to the ancients to best know how to destroy our civilization?

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

If one adds the access to easy and free pornography to the equation described in the video below, we have even more reasons why it may be the same situation today as in Ancient Rome. Another reason why men may avoid committed relationships with women. Or more accurately, another variable to an equation which the state has tipped the scales heavily in every aspect and variable of the family equation.

One wonders if the Left who have been engineering the demise of the West for over 100 years now, didn’t have a solid grasp on the ancients and use that knowledge to erode the foundations of Western Civilization. Clearly feminism was an attack on the family, and as Raegan correctly observed, the family is the basis of Western Civilization.

“The family is the keystone of Western civilization. The family is the basic unit of society. It is the foundation upon which all other institutions are built.” -R. Raegan.

Is the actual quote. And clearly the left knows it, and clearly the left attacked it.

Feminism today has most decidedly changes the equation such that many young men avoid committed relationships with women. In part because as the video says, in Roman times the equation was changed legally to make it inequitable, but also from what they have seen with their own eyes happens to men in marriage. Often in their own families.

Add to that the lionization of homosexuality, and the curiously reasonable settlements for failed relationships as compared to what happens within that which I have come to think of as “a mixed marriage”, (one with a male and a female).

There is a skirmish line, or perhaps an ORBAT of dialectical weaponry which has been attacking Western Civilization in every aspect And its effects are now inescapable, even to those in denial. Many, perhaps most still are in denial of the cause and intentions. But at this point few argue the effects.

Below, Stephen Coughlin’s short brief on Feminism as a Marxist war on women. The first couple of minutes he is discussing previous speakers, so the confusion there is natural. But as he gets into his own presentation, it’s quite compelling and clear.

There is another aspect to the attack on the family which requires a lengthy and detailed analysis, but this is not the place to do it.

But in brief, it is the attack, rapidly gaining ground in the West, where institutions and therapists are estranging children from their parents. That picayune and ordinary conflicts expected between personalities, but not in any way at the magnitude or real abuse or torture, are weaponized such that children are convinced to divorce themselves from their parents.

Arguments can be made that sometimes this is the right move for the child. And sometimes it likely is. But it’s far far more rare than the actual occurrence of it. One could say that it is like divorce and abortion in that sense. A necessary evil becomes a weapon against the entire institution.

A couple of links on that phenomenon. First how therapists use Marxist reasoning in general, but its easy to see how it applies here.

This therapist has an entire practice of attempting to undo this particular attack on the family.

This shifting level of abstraction for dialectical , or destructive purposes is a repeated tactic of the left. Canadians for example may remember how the media in the 1989 attack on women engineering students in Montreal, reshaped a Muslim’s attack on the women at Ecole Polytechnique such that marches took place regularly to demonize men overall as misogynistic and evil by nature, while scrubbing the Islamic culture from the motive and perpetrator.

We call that trick, the skipping of layers of abstraction. You take an event and change the level of abstraction of the components of it to suit a narrative, rather than the truth. Muslim crime based on Muslim culture and the structure of its Deen, are projected onto all men. They still did that to cover for the Islamic mass child-sex-slave-gangs in the UK and elsewhere for a while. “That’s always happened!”. “British men did that to!”

The exception becomes the rule when it isnt.

As an aside, the counter to that is that when a non-Muslim murders a woman in their family it is a crime, and thought of as such by all people including the perp himself and the family. But in Islam it is a matter of celebration. The state they live in may consider it a crime, but the family does not, as they are the ones who did it collectively and therefore it is apples to oranges.

The only unusual thing here is the family was given life sentences. But the family itself knows it did “the right thing ” by its own values.

If you search for honour killings in the UK however, you will find that the sentencing for these exact kind of murders are very light as a rule.

POSTSCRIPT

This post is a little ramblish and stream of consciousness. It is basically just the author of this site trying to make sense of events and connecting them to historical situations to understand both the now, and more importantly, the impetus and motives for the agencies behind how things are now.

The current state of the West is not organic. It is the result of sustained attacks on reason, truth and nature to achieve an untenable situation to tip over Western Civ. It’s principle weapon is dialectics. It’s main kinetic weapon is the importation of Islam.

I hope some of this makes sense to someone.

 

Stephen Coughlin’s 2015 Red Pill Brief and newly published 2024 report: October 7: Black Revolution

Posted on by — Leave a reply

RAIR Foundation has republished the entire Stephen Coughlin Red Pill Brief from 2015 in Vienna. For those who have not seen it, or have not seen it for some time, we recommend it highly.

Each segment is presented with a synopsis so you can easily find the segment you want should you wish to revisit it or send it to a colleague.

Fast Forward to today, Stephen has published a brief he has from July 2024 concerning the October 7th attack against Israel and how it is part of a joint strategy between islam and the Left to create chaos across the West. While the document was written a couple of years ago, it was not published until today.

 

 

Intersectional lines of attack in the arts: The dialectical destruction of culture

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

It’s been quite a few years now since people started noticing how many TV series’ and movies suddenly had homosexual or otherwise ‘woke’ characters in them. Series and movies where there was no actual value to the story by having a homosexual or otherwise non-typical sexual practitioner as a lead role. It served no purpose other than to shove gay characters in front of the audience within a series or movie which had earned a significant platform by its own merits. A usurpation of sorts of a meritorious production in order to either cause people to disconnect from the story, thereby destroying its value as a cultural icon, or to get people to accept as normal the imposition and injection of political narratives into the culture. Therefore, a win-win for the leftist social engineers. Dialecticians more accurately since the purpose was destruction in the final outcome.

They destroy the aspect, icon, component of the culture or, they warp it to their own purpose. Either way, a win for the left.

We are of course defining the left as a strategy for the destruction of the West, and any culture for that matter down to the roots and below using dialectics. As time goes by, it becomes more and more clear that this is what it is. Listen to CBC TV or radio for any given hour with a clear head about what you are actually hearing and you get at least an undergrad degree in the process. They cannot have a single interview about anything without injecting one or another state narratives into the subject. Global warming, the evil of the right, Orange-man-bad or whatever it is. And this could be in an interview about squirrel migration patterns or the curious patterns of Scottish socks.

Examples are legion. This process, this form of attack has permeated almost all pop culture at this point. But a couple of examples stick out for me, although each of you I am sure will have your own examples of ruined pop-culture that sticks in your craw. They are even doing it to sports with rainbow days or whatever.

This campaign which permeated Hockey and NFL Football was called, “Hockey is for Everyone” or “Football is for Everyone”. This of course is using the inclusion dialectic device. Typically inclusive is a word weaponized to mean, everyone but the people who normally are involved. In this case it is more a function of. if hockey is for everyone it’s for no one. Which is like the end state they are after. it isn’t like gay people etc. couldn’t enjoy hockey before this if they wanted to. Or play it. They just couldn’t have men dress like women in ball gowns and make up and read to kids on the ice while dancing suggestively.

I think the odd team told them to stick it but all to often we see pro football, baseball and even hockey doing ‘pride’ gestures at games.

Again, a win win for the left. The public comes to accept the unacceptable or lose interest in professional sports. Either way, the destruction of the culture is the teleological goal.

Star Wars is probably the single most iconic cultural product for white American young men, now pretty much totally ruined by awful sequels and TV series where the writing centred around aliens with bizarre sexual practices and their discussions around them along with the usual victim oppressor narratives. People tuned out. The franchise is dead. Commenters would talk about the woke nature of the shows and movies, but mistakenly thought that it was a fashion error on the part of the writers. They don’t get the intention of it all. There is simply no way this can happen by accident.

A vastly smaller example, but one where the same or similar device was used to destroy other icons, was the series The Exorcist. It was a short lived TV series based on the next generation from the movie. In the series, the daughter who was possessed, played in the movie by Linda Blair, is now a mother of her own children. I wont’ say more cause the point doesn’t need spoilers.

The first season was actually pretty good. But in season 2, the rugged priest who was the essence of a moral, John Wayne like, quiet suffering noble character goes and has sex with a rugged fisherman he meets somewhere. Purely unnecessary to the story. But an excellent way to nuke the series off the air as well as pollute one’s vision of the priesthood, the movie, the series, and everything related.

This device is used a lot to ruin iconic cultural products of the West.

Again, the issue is not having a homosexual character. it is using one to be an intersectional line of attack against the series, movie or concepts within it, itself.

It is weaponizing non-typical sexuality. Prior to the revolution there were many gay people in movies and on TV. They were participants in the culture. There was no issue, or there was no issue remotely like the one today.

This brings me forward to a story told to me by a musician recently. He had gone to an amateur coffee house to see a singer guitar player and see what was up. It was a typical young woman who could strum a few chords and sing a few songs. Still, nice to see people go to that instead of sitting on their phones. Live music should be a more important part of our culture than it is today.

But the second song he saw was interesting. It had a very familiar melody, arrangement and, well frankly absolutely everything about it was exactly familiar to a famous song except the lyrics.

After thinking on it a bit, he figured out what the original song was.

Here are a couple of videos of the original song. Then the version that was played at the coffee house:

Personally I love the Whitney Houston version a lot:

So the title: The Battle Hymn of the Republic

The Hook line prior to the Chorus: His Truth goes marching on

The Chorus: Glory Glory Hallelujah 

He did not record the artist. But the song she did turns out to be a well known one in certain circles:

 

Title: Solidarity Forever

The hook line prior to the Chorus: The Union Makes us Strong

Chorus: Solidarity Forever

Every note and the arrangement is a steal from The battle Hymn. This is not an accident.

Often when these attacks first started, the odd person asked the question: “Hey why do they have to inject all this woke crap into movies and music? Why can’t they write their own”? The answer is why these things exist. They were never meant to be artistic expression. They are a Marxist form of attack on culture itself. They are a less obvious form of attack than Post Modernism which shows contempt for art through its own cynical creativity. Most famously as an example, the man who submitted a urinal from a mens room to a gallery sculpture competition. Cynical, contemptuous of art, but at least it was an original idea. The musical equivalent? Listen to Yoko Ono Sing.

Seriously, Listen to Ono sing but keep one or two aspirins nearby and for the love of God not the whole bottle. Leave her on for too long and the temptation to MAiD oneself could be overwhelming.

She is clearly doing a postmodern attack on Music. Which is a pretty cynical thing for the wife of John Lennon to do.

In this case though, this is a direct intersectional line of attack on a musical cultural icon of the United States. The song is patriotic, Christian, profound and meaningful to American culture and belief. And it was copied note for note into a communist anthem and sung by someone who had never seen the inside of a mine or swung a pickaxe in her entire life.

This is the dialectic negation of culture via art.

9 data points on the collapse of North America due to joint attacks by Islam and communism: Links 1 for July 12, 2026

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

1. Amazing testimony at a planning council to try and stop a sharia compound from being built and populated.

The Tweet by Amy Mek has the facts of the situation as well as the details of the Military Vet who gave this testimony.

2. Germany: Record high 53% of gang rape suspects were foreigners in 2025, 751 victims gang raped

So at this point, the ‘per-capita’ thing just doesn’t even matter anymore. Although per-capita the numbers are now overwhelming. We can now say with conviction that our political class has done this to us deliberately. 

The share of foreigners involved in gang rapes hit a record high in 2025, reaching 53 percent. A total of 751 victims were gang-raped in the country. The data comes from a response by the German federal government to a parliamentary request by the Alternative for Germany (AfD).

According to the statistics, 53 percent of the suspects — a total of 574 — did not have German citizenship in gang rape cases. Broken down by nationality, 110 suspects came from Syria, 64 from Afghanistan, 46 from Iraq, 44 from Turkey, and the rest from other countries, Focus Online reported.

Among the victims, 80 percent were German citizens.

While the report discloses that 509 suspects came from Germany, data about a possible migration background among German citizens was not recorded separately. Previous studies have shown that when the first names of gang rape suspects are analyzed, a total of 75 percent of gang rapes are committed by individuals with a foreign first name.

One wonders what a 5 year sentence for a Muslim looks like in Germany. One would guess 3 months in a club fed then an increased home living allowance.

3. The Church of England is reverting. Once upon a time (in 2018) we published a guest essay from a young woman in the UK who was exposing what she learned while a CoE member about the plan to implement, “Chrislam”. This is clearly what is happening here.

Click through and read. 

4. So this happened in Vancouver. The media has censored it.

For those that want an answer to the question, “Who’s ordering the CBC to run this story and not that story”, search Rumble for anything with Rodney Palmer.

Here is the first hit:

5. Feminists who agitated for female police, as well as unchecked mass immigration, will find that very soon, female police will be back at desk work, or working only on the streets in safe, non-Islamic or non-South-Asian neighbourhoods that they won’t admit are a thing.

6. These people are paid to do this, and suffer minimal consequences if any for these kinds of actions. As far as we can tell, not even deportation, although that usually just means at worst another boat ride back in.

7. I guess the only reason he is allowed to post this on Twitter, is his deflecting use of the word, “Islamist” when there is in fact no such thing. The proper word is Muslims. One would not call the people who worked at Nazi death camps, “Nazistists”. They were just the pointy end of one of the many Nazi spears.

8. Wales: (Not that it matters. The new COMINTERN has destroyed the nation state in favour of the Umma and a communist world disunited in dialectics.

9. TWO mass shooting in Toronto this weekend

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

More of the same really – several data points out of thousands that indicate the state-islamic-Communist actions against the legacy population of Western Civ: Links 1 for July 10, 2026

Posted on by

It is very important to understand the mechanisms under what we are fed as “information” today.

What we are experiencing is NOT “two tier policing”. Nor is it “Hypocrisy. It is a well laid out blueprint by the UN, EU, WEF, Bilderberg people etc. etc. Who Stephen Coughlin refers to as, “The powers that be” or PTB.

Start with this RAIR article on some of the solid evidences of this. below, a few more examples that really should be a slam dunk for the case. We all see these examples every day all over social media. What we are asking for here, is for people to see it differently in order to come to an actual understanding of the cause, rather than just an endless amount of rage and frustration from seeing its result.

1. The story below represents two separate Lines of Effort. The communist one to deracinate Western identity and individualism. But also the Islamic one to replace Western Rule of law and equality with sharia and Islamic supremacy.

Here is Grok’s explanation of the post, as I was not familiar with this tradition and needed context on this event:

Tommy Robinson criticizes the arrest of a 56-year-old man in Moygashel, Northern Ireland, after a replica mosque and signs reading “Secure our borders” and “End the threat of radical Islam” were placed on a large loyalist bonfire ahead of July 12th commemorations marking the Battle of the Boyne.
Police detained the man under Article 9 of the Public Order (NI) Order 1987 for suspected display of material intended to stir up hatred, with the PSNI confirming the action amid widespread condemnation from politicians and church leaders.
The post and replies frame the incident as disproportionate policing of political protest during traditional unionist bonfire season, contrasting it with other controversial displays that have not led to similar enforcement.

2. De facto sharia:

3. Unrelated really, but someone should make a movie Kind about. this.

We all know the facts. The guy who threw the rock would never face an hour in jail or a day in court. The guy who took retribution might have his life completely destroyed based on the laws as they are written, and the law as it is now deployed, which is what this post is about.

So how bad are things really when people are ready to risk the consequences of the unfairness of the system to deal with these matters themselves?

4. How much time do you think he will actually serve, and will it deter him from his goals?

5. The swapping out of Rule of Law for Sharia appears to be moving from the Commonwealth to the USA now

On that subject, read RAIR Foundation. They are the most up to date on the Islamification of the United States.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

A couple of sorta random data points:

 

Robert Spencer dismantles Tucker Carlson and his guest, JD Hall’s ludicrous analysis of Islamic history and attacks on Israel

Posted on by

We were fans of Tucker’s during the communist revolution of 2020. He was the only big microphone to give a platform to counter-narrative voices such as Dr. Peter McCullough, Alex Berenson and many others who stood against the Western-World-Wide totalitarian mandates for experimental gene therapy shots. So maybe it’s a little extra painful to see him turn to the dark side since he went indie.

He has had a lot of guests that promote antisemitism in any number of ways. One was some guy who claimed that Churchill was the baddie and Hitler was just misunderstood. Can’t remember who it was, but even he said in a subsequent interview that Tucker’s introduction of him exaggerated his credentials. Another was a Jewish comedian who did a brilliantly funny routine dismantling Judaism as a belief system. But Tucker had him on as a guest for a very different reason. Having a Jewish comedian to rip on Judaism is essentially like Hamas using those fuzzy tire headed pseudo-Jews demand the end of Israel as a nation state.

In June Carlson had another ‘historian’ on who claimed the Ottoman Empire, the Islamic Caliphate treated Christians better than contemporary Israel does now.

It was so transparently an attack on Jews and Israel that hopefully it undermined its own authority. But then some people still watch CBC so it’s amazing how many digestive enzymes people can contain for the excrement of male cattle.

The article at RAIR can be seen here.

The segment of the JD Hall interview is below:

Robert Spencer’s actual history of the location and period is below:

Ignoring the subject matter altogether, this post also contains an excellent example of the contrast between a claim and an argument. JD Hall makes claims with no substantiating argument. If you fact check it you will find out how accurate it is on your own. Robert on the other hand substantiates his claims with evidence. he makes each one an actual argument explaining context and Islamic law as well as historical proofs.

Please share with anyone you feel would benefit from this.

 

South Africa street demo against mass immigration? Canada should be treated like Cuba by the US pretty soon: Links 1 for July 5, 2026

Posted on by

1. Diana West: Marx Didn’t Distinguish Between “Communism” and “Socialism”; Why Should We?

NB: This column in its original form ran in The Epoch Times on February 3, 2020. As Americans once again clash over the unimportant and purposefully distracting “differences” between socialists and communists, it seemed like a good time to run it again.

When President Donald Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity that he believes the Democrats’ frontrunner, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), is a communist, the president clarified, “You could say socialist,” but then again, “I think of Bernie sort of as a socialist but far beyond a socialist.”

As the pundits trip over poli-sci-class definitions, my question is, what’s the difference?

As far as freedom-lovers go, safeguarding our liberties guaranteed by the Constitution, there is none. To be sure, communists and socialists argue and split hairs. They fight and break heads. But they also work together and destroy liberty because they all travel to the same soul-crushing destination of collectivism.

What anti-communists need to know is that communists and socialists—and “democratic socialists,” Fabians, progressives, “Alinskyites” (not to mention most Democrats and an awful lot of Republicans)—believe in the same centrally planned, varyingly totalitarian vision for America that our Founding Fathers would have had to declare independence from all over again.

To that point of ideological convergence, here are a couple of argument-settling quotations from recognized experts—one, from the anti-communist camp; the other, from the communist camp.

Please read the rest of this important post at Diana’s substack. This does matter. The number of arguments I have had with Canucks over Canada, or Scandinavian countries being Socialist not communist etc. is large. Even the ones well onside tend to look at socialism as a gateway drug for communism. In fact, becoming communist like an area becoming Islamic. its a process, always moving towards more of itself.

Our personal view is that what Canadians see as “socialism” in Canada, obviously prior to the communist revolution of the election of Justin Trudeau, is actually just civilization. Stay with me here a minute please.

Civilization is about skimming surplus wealth from a culture within a jurisdiction or polity that allows the state to make everyone’s lives better. Roads, rail when needed and useful, infrastructure, police, military to protect the liberties and culture of the state etc. And as the people get more affluent because of their activity, it may generate more tax revenue that could allow for more things that in theory could make life better for everyone. THIS IS NOT Socialism.

This is civilization.

Socialism is not state paid medical care. Socialism is when the state decides who is worthy of it for political or narrative reasons. When people are discriminated against within the system for any demographic or political reasons. Most of what we see in Canada is the retaking of legitimate civilizational impulses for the purpose of destroying civilization itself. The Cloward Piven Strategy is an apex example of this.

Socialism/Communism is diabolical. It is the evil transformation of all that is good into a destructive, hate filled, cynical force of destruction. It is the obliteration of all that is right and good. It is no accident that before Marx started in on his Communist writings he was a Satanist. Wrote poetry to Satan and his disciple, Saul Alinsky, dedicated his most famous book, Rules for Radicals to Satan.

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

As it turns out, Solzhenitsyn agrees.

Templeton Prize Address (1983) – “Men Have Forgotten God”

“Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force, more fundamental than all their political and economic pretensions. Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to communist policy; it is not a side effect, but the central pivot. To achieve its diabolical ends, communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails the destruction of faith and nationhood.

Anyway, please click through to Diana’s full article.

2. Extrapolating on what we have seen the Trudeau/Carney state do up to now, we think the black redacted square in this document which was redacted, would likely be an aporxamation of: Any speech published from any kind of authoritative position that is in defiance of or contradiction to, a state narrative. It won’t be those exact words. But it will be that concept. The definitions they use to describe speech that is verboten also is so nebulous that it can be interpreted however the state wants and to whomever the state wants. Just like it is now for hate speech etc.

This documents specifically lists a number of Maoist mass line narrative attacks as things that need to be protected. The memo also explains that the CSE will be the ones to “educate Canadians on on what disinformation is, while also increasing awareness of who creates it and why they do it.”

Ladies and gentlemen I would like to point out that the photo below is in fact of the CSE, Canadian Security Establishment agency building HQ in Ottawa:

If anyone had been told for the last several thousand years that a man could become a woman or a woman could become a man merely by declaring themselves as such, and various mutilations could be done to slightly approximate the effect but not the reality in any reproductive sense, and then had it explained to them that the word, Disinformation means the deliberate spreading of a falsehood in order to damage a target, then the flag on the CSE HQ the size of a soccer field would perfectly constitute disinformation.

Watch the video and be afraid. And send it to anyone you know in Canada, or that needs to understand the nature of Canada as it actually is and as it is becoming today.

3. Wanna know why the British government took away force multipliers from the public?

A few facts on how the British people dealt with guns, the public and the police prior to 1920:

Gun ownership was more common in Britain (especially pre-1920) than it is today. Middle-class and upper-class people could legally buy handguns and rifles relatively easily for self-defence, sport, or protection of property. There was no strict licensing system like today.
British police (bobbies) generally did not carry firearms routinely. This was a deliberate policy from the founding of the modern police force in 1829 — they were meant to be a civilian force, not militarised.
There were occasional incidents where unarmed police borrowed pistols from members of the public during emergencies. The most famous example is the Tottenham Outrage in 1909, where during a long armed chase, several police officers borrowed handguns from bystanders to return fire. Some civilians also joined the chase while armed.

Anyone think Pakistani harems of British children would have been a thing then?

4. Conservative Treehouse has this exactly right. The CBC is an extension of the Canadian government, and uses some of the same condescending devices especially used by Trudeau and Carney. Especially when they state what Canadians think, feel and what our culture is.

U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra appears for an interview on CBC News to share perspectives on U.S-Canada relations.  However, what happens within the interview is a case study on how Canadian media represent an extension of the Canadian government.

This example is exactly why the Canadian people have no reference point for information counter to the official propaganda policy from their government offices. Rebecca Zandbergen, host of CBC’s Ottawa Morning represents the voice of government in combative tone, condescending attitude and refusal to accept counter arguments.

The level of passive-aggressive condescension highlights why Canada has continued to lose position in a world where pretending has become devalued.  However, it’s clear why the Canadian people will be stunned when it all collapses around them.  They have no reference points. Ambassador Hoekstra should get hazard pay. WATCH (prompted):

The best thing I have seen on this was something along the lines of, ‘The Canadian people may or may not realize the fact that the Elbows Up movement has in fact become the Ankles Up one. Read the article over at the

5. When South Africa has street demonstrations against mass immigration, you know something huge is going on, and where the people of the world have no damn say in their own affairs or governance.

And when one of the signs reads against not have any “no go zones” we can assume the issue is Islamic immigration.

Thank you all for checking out this site, and to Gates of Vienna for several tips on things concerning the world and Canada.