Brand sentencing is proof there is not two tiered justice

This is not a small point, nor is it an attempt at being clever. This matters. A lot.

The UK is communist in the most classical sense, but in a modern method of execution. it is also being implemented in stages as opposed to all at once. We are in a phase of that revolution across the West and most noticeably to we English speakers in the Anglosphere for obvious reasons. That is the news and social media posts we can understand. Germany and other Western nations are also undergoing the same process though.

A  central feature of a communist revolution is the movement upwards of political power from the individual to the state. That power can then be exorcised in what seems as even a whimsical way by the faceless bureaucrats and leaders who run the state. False narratives that are clearly and obviously untrue can be invented and launched on to the public with massive consequences to the culture and people’s most fundamental rights. Opposing them is initially fought by unofficial state thugs like ANTIFA or BLM, Me Too movement etc. while the revolution is still nascent and then later as the revolution becomes mature, by statute. Off the top of my head I can’t think of a better example than Canadian bill C4 that criminalizes parents if they try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming care” after a state agent like a teacher or councillor talked them into it. Usually with an insane metaphysic like “being born in the wrong body”. This one dialectic is all of the above in one Line of Operation.

In a modern Communist state, the crime most important to power is to stand against a state narrative from a position of authority. That will be punished severely. We can know this by what happened to every doctor or scientist that objected to the Covid measures and the mRNA injection mandates. Any doctor, scientific authority or influential journalist who spoke against these insane measures found their lives destroyed. This site is too full of examples to mention here although the first one we interviewed personally, Dr. Mary O’Connor is truly a stellar example of the state modus operandi and its consequences. They will not call it that though. They will use a device and the most convenient one for wealthy powerful or famous men is usually the ‘Me Too’ method of negating a person by accusations of sexual misconduct. The British have been doing this a while now. They did it to Vladimir Bukovski. He was a high profile ex-Soviet citizen who escaped to the UK and become well known for explaining that the EU was in fact a reproduction of the Soviet system of control and even by design of the USSR. He was cancelled in the UK for illegal pornographic material on his computer.

For those who want to know more about Bukovsky, find anything you can by Diana West on him. Also there are still lots of videos of his lectures. They are worth it if you want to know what the true nature of the EU is.

Brand also went against state narratives. During Covid he was pretty good actually. We were personally suspicious of how someone of his stature could actually stand against the Western States’ narratives on Covid and the Vaxx and not be arrested. Those questions are here somewhere on that site. But he went against a lot of state narratives and did point out some of the dialects directed against reality itself. Like the metaphysic of people being born in the wrong body. There is a video at the bottom of this post where he spends over half an hour with Charlie Kirk on some of these.

We covered somewhat on another post in the last few days the obvious contrast between how Muslims who do real rape are handled in the UK (and in the West in general) with evidence, DNA, video, recent testimony and witnesses. These cases are pretty much treated like littering or parking infractions. Ok some of the worst do time somewhat close to Brand’s sentence, although I don’t know how long they serve inside, but their crimes are crimes. Not 20 year old allegations resting on reframed descriptions of events where the names of the accusers are not known, and police actually asked them to come forward. No right to face the accuser. In France not that long ago, a Muslim broke into an elderly Jewish woman’s apartment, raped her and threw her off her balcony to her death. He was acquitted because he was smoking Marijuana at the time. I bet you Russel was high on a lot more than that when he was hitting on women who didn’t seem to object at the time. And why am I comparing France to England? Because they are all undergoing the same communist revolution at the same time, deploying the same revolutionary methods against their legacy populations. The mass import of hostile aliens, the transformation of Rule of Law into this hybridized Sharia-Communist system, the raising to the level of sacred scripture of state narrative and the total capture of mass media and replacement of truth with language that forces people of legacy culture to accept the morbid and grotesque untruths  as morally superior to how every culture everywhere throughout all of history would deal with these issues.

As we have said many times, hate speech laws are the secular equivalent of blasphemy laws in Muslim countries. And like blasphemy laws, they are applied in ways that increases state power. Not in any form of equal application of justice. We see that across the West and especially in the UK and soon Canada, where people are being arrested by the tens of thousands for criticizing Islam even in a totally factual and important way, while in Mosques 5X a day they openly call for the extermination of Jews and Christians. This again, is NOT two tiered justice. It has a Telos. It has a purpose. It has an end state which all of the enforcement and judgments and so on point to. This is not corruption of a system. it is an entirely new system with a different objective than the one people are feverishly clinging to and imagining still exists.

At this point people actually know the real laws. Legacy British people know what will happen if they accuse a migrant, especially a Muslim or rape. The chances of them being arrested for pointing out the Islamic fact of their behaviour, dress and so on means they might more likely be arrested than the rapist.

No. This is not an exaggeration and has been the case for over 10 years now. Again, read Peter McLoughlin‘s book, Easy Meat or watch the interview in Michael Hansen’s movie, Killing Europe with a Rotherham Harem survivor.

Tommy Robinson is another obvious example of this system from day 1. The fact that he has managed to keep going despite the time in jail in multiple sentences, one of which was for actually questioning convicted Muslim Harem operators in the UK, is close to a miracle.

(As another aside, reading or listening to the Audiobook of Aristotle’s The Politics is wonderful to behold as we see the same issues and problems from three centuries before Christ. It offers a wry smile on every couple of pages for those contemplating the trade-offs a society has to make between power ,money and populations and even collectivization vs. individualism. So that didn’t start with Marx or Hegel.)

So in essence then, The UK, Canada, France etc. do NOT have a “two tiered justice system”. They have a very different system of laws and enforcement that people will either not understand, or most commonly, refuse to allow themselves to believe that such a thing is possible. They will cling to some version of Hanlon’s Razor that this is a corruption of the system they must believe still exists rather than accept that a fundamentally new system altogether is in place.

For example I know two men personally in Canada who in divorce court, the judge tilted the table against the fathers and explained why by using the word, “Patriarchy” in the court. This is no small thing. This is a negation of all fairness and the systematic attribution of malevolence to the male simply because he is a male. In both cases, the facts, the money, the custody of children made zero difference. It was a narrative dictated decision. Males are of the patriarchy, and therefore all judgements must heavily favour the female.

Look at what happened to people who gave a few dollars to the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, before the trucks even arrived in that city for the protest. They had their accounts frozen by the state, and state thugs, namely ANTIFA attacked their homes and businesses. Those people just supported those who opposed totalitarian communist state narratives on movement, business and forced injections. And while the protest was still legal in the old fashioned sense of being legal. In other words, within the rights of the individual. Trudeau and Carney both passed bills that totally obliterate the individual’s rights to freedom of speech, control over your children’s decisions including not to get spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming-Care”. And that is just one dialectic of many.

Frankly this subject really is the coinage of this site for the last at least 7 years. But in summary, calling it “two-tired-justice is to miss the target to the point where you have no effective opposition to it. Understand the enemy first. Then develop strategies and tactics. Ezra Levant may be the first person to defeat the “Canadian Human Rights Commissions”, itself a communist (and dialectical) organization who’s purpose is to remove human rights and create state controlled collective ‘rights’. Rights which are to be dialectically enforced like all the other examples given here, with Russel brand’s conviction and sentence being the anchor. Levant managed to defeat the previously undefeated “Human Rights Courts” by shining a powerful light on what they do to people. But that tactic no longer works because of the sheer volume of what people see as gross injustices by the state. It is now too much to bear and people switch off. As another rather laser sharp example of the dialectical nature of the CHRC,they convicted ethnic hair-waxing salons and fined them out of business because they refused to wax the testicles of a man who decided to claim he was a woman, and therefore his testicles had been alchemically converted into a Vulva and they were legally obliged to wax it. The CHRCs agreed. You can look up Johnathan Yaniv on this site or Blazing Cat Fur and find the whole ordeal in detail.

 

This understanding matters because the only shot we have to recover an individualist state, what people call a Democracy, is first, to understand we can’t fix this system within the system when it is not the system we think it is whatsoever. We have to understand what has actually taken place and we have to stage a counter-revolution to either reclaim what our ancestors have built, or more likely, re invent the wheel. Create a proper Constitution like the US one in modern and clear language with solid lines drawn between state power and individual rights, and then describe the machinery needed to preserve that constitution, fight for it, then raise children with an understanding of the system and how to preserve it.

The number of people who voluntarily left school and university to go fight WW2 compared to how many students dropped out to protest the Vietnam war tells us a lot about how education was captured first and what that led to is now obvious.

Still, Russel Brand is really just one data point for this thesis.

The following videos are good descriptions of what happened to Brand other than they call it a miscarriage of justice, or an example of a two tiered state. Again, it’s neither. It is in fact, a good example of the actual system that is now in place.

34 minutes of Charlie Kirk and Russel Brand. Both ‘inconvenient’ men are now dealt with.

Frankly, we don’t know or care if Brand’s Christianity is an act or not. if he is sincere, it will have the benefit of making his jail term easier. The value of faith is it allows greater endurance of suffering. One might argue that is why it exists in the first place. But he certainly looks like he is in the category of those canceled by the Communist state for opposing its narratives, whatever else he may be.

The following video has some crude imagery. but he gets a lot of the important elements right.

Poland & Russel Brand: Links post 1 for Nov. 8th, 2026

There really is a great deal going on and a great deal of propaganda and disinformation surrounding it.

The attack in Poland is probably very much aligned with the cult of Alexander Dugin known as “national Bolsheviks”, which was the same group the 2 kids who shot up a mosque and Gardner in the US recently and then shot each other was connected to, and of course most famously, the Christchurch NZ shooter.

So far no symbols such as the Black Sun has been shown to the public, as Poland, now being an EU/UN communist state is feverishly trying to call the man who murdered his own family then trued for a mass casualty event in Warsaw, “far right wing”, as they always do.

Here is some of what has found its way to the public.

At the moment there is no evidence linking him to National Bolshevism. And I am not arguing that absesnce of evidence is evidence of censorship. There may not be a link at all. But it’s a reasonable theory given how the media treated the Christchurch attacker of mosques. They made possession of his maniefsto illegal and immediately rewrote it to suit a leftist internationalist anti-Nation-state agenda, linking Trump and so on and so on. The document is now widely available online other than for New Zealanders. So it’s a worthy hypothesis.

Interestingly, there are convoys of German military vehicles in Poland now for some reason. Some opinion publishers suggest an eerily German scent to events in Poland recently in general. One Polish ex-pat we spoke with at some length has deep suspicions that this is a German op. A kind of political false flag to get Poland under German control. Not the first time they tried that, so…

Well, not for SOME reason. For this reason. Or is it an excuse?

The other thing that is dominating the attention-o-sphere is the conviction of Russel Brand. People arguing on one or the other side of the issue feel the need to state what they think of him. Actually what matters is rule of law and do we have any. And no, we don’t. There is tons and tons of videos and opinion pieces out there more informed and better than anything I could write. Instead, I ask you to look at these links and ask yourself to compare the coverage and justice of it, to what Russel Brand is alleged to have done, 20 years ago.

Full text:

“They tried to penetrate every opening of our bodies.”

German woman Claudia Vosen and her daughter suffered a mass sexual assault at the hands of Arabs during the Cologne New Year’s Eve attacks of 2015/16.

After the harrowing sexual assaults, Vosen faced a new hell from co-workers who called her racist.

She is speaking out now, a decade later, to EMMA magazine.

She said when migrants finished sexually assaulting them over the course of a half-hour, the women were “spat out.” Vosen filed a complaint that night; she was one of 627 women who did so just in one city, Cologne.

What followed, she said, was almost as damaging as the attack.

“When I arrived at work in January and told everyone what had happened to me, they said: ‘You’re crazy. They really messed me up. What are you saying… that’s not true. Otherwise we would have heard or read something. You have something against foreigners,’” said Vosen. “Everything was swept under the rug. That was the worst part. It was denied, covered up.”

Vosen’s daughter also suffered. On the schoolyard, her daughter heard, “Just be glad you weren’t raped.”

Vosen’s daughter began avoiding groups of young men who appeared Arab.

“Young women don’t defend themselves the way we used to,” says the mother. “They no longer dare to laugh in the face of a group of boys who cause them problems. They answer cautiously. They are afraid.”

“New Year’s Eve opened my eyes,” said Claudia Vosen. “For me, there is a before and an after.”

She also stated that afterwards, the demonstrations were not against the mass sexual assaults and rapes but instead focused on “racism.”

She said these protesters did not act out of solidarity with the victims but with the migrants.

“Instead of simply saying who the perpetrators are, whether right or left. We weren’t allowed to say back then: ‘Those were Arabs.’ All that remained was: people with a foreign appearance,” she said.

Nationwide, 1,200 women filed reports of sexual violence that fateful night. Estimates indicated the number of men involved at more than 2,000.

Cologne Police President Wolfgang Albers initially called the night “largely peaceful.”

Days later, he admitted, as reported by the BBC, that a “very large number of sexual assaults” had been committed by groups of young men “largely of North African or Arab appearance.”

An internal federal police report revealed that women ran a “gauntlet” through masses of heavily intoxicated foreign men “that words cannot describe.” The report labeled the scene as “chaotic and shameful.”

North Rhine-Westphalia Interior Minister Ralf Jäger later told a state parliamentary committee that the perpetrators were “almost exclusively” people with a migration background.

“All signs point to these being North Africans and people from the Arab world,” he said, adding that asylum seekers who had arrived just months earlier were among the suspects.

Of 153 suspects identified in Cologne for offenses that night, about two-thirds were from Morocco or Algeria; roughly 44% were asylum seekers and another 12% were believed to be in Germany illegally.

However, actual convictions were almost non-existent due to the chaos and the lack of footage, which means hundreds of women went without justice.

From the UK. But frankly, as shocking as this example is, anyone who read Peter McLoughlin’s book, Easy Meat which was a 100% vetted and properly researched book on Muslim Harems, or what should be called, “Child-sex slavery of non-Muslim girls, would know how stunningly typical this is in the UK now, and for at least the last twenty years. The Pakistani Muslims who kept Charlene Downs in sex slavery, then killed and fed her body to the public in Kebabs, which is how all available evidence shows this took place, were not convicted of anything. That case in fact is what promoted Tommy Robinson to prominence. No one else would publicize the case and Tommy managed to get major protests out about it and the issue of Islamic harems of British girls in general. This is why the British state has been using all its power to persecute him while being careful not to martyr him. Another reason by the way, we should always remember the name of Kevin Crehan, who died in prison serving a one year sentence for leaving a strip of bacon on a mosque doorknob. No harm to anyone, and no violence whatsoever. Just left some bacon. The formal charge in a rational world MIGHT be littering. he got the death penalty by proxy.

And three more picked at random.

Adil Rashid (Nottingham, UK, 2013)
An 18-year-old Muslim from Birmingham, educated in a madrassa/Islamic school, met a 13-year-old girl on Facebook, arranged to meet her, and had sex with her (statutory rape). He claimed he did not know it was illegal because of his “sheltered” upbringing and education that devalued women. Judge Michael Stokes at Nottingham Crown Court imposed a nine-month youth custody sentence suspended for two years, plus a two-year probation order. The judge cited Rashid’s sexual naivety, immaturity, and passivity, and said immediate custody would do “more damage than good.” Reporting at the time noted that comparable cases typically attracted 4–7 years’ imprisonment.? Daily Mail

Mohamed Aziz Ben Ishak (Quebec, Canada, 2026 reporting of earlier offence)
A Tunisian national (temporary resident) violently assaulted his partner after she lit a cigarette before sunset during Ramadan. He kicked her in the ribs, punched her repeatedly in the head, extinguished a lit cigarette on her forearm, and dragged her by the hair. A Quebec court judge granted a conditional discharge (no conviction/criminal record if conditions are met) plus three years’ probation and 240 hours of community service. The judge described the sentence as “lenient” and acknowledged it was unlikely to satisfy the victim, while taking into account the offender’s lack of prior record, remorse, and immigration status.? Nationalpost

Afghan refugee (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, 2021)
A refugee from Afghanistan sexually assaulted a stranger in Kitchener. Justice Karey Katzsch accepted a joint Crown-defence recommendation for a conditional discharge (finding of guilt but no conviction, with conditions). The defence highlighted that a conviction risked deportation and possible execution by the Taliban; the judge agreed to the non-custodial outcome. This is one of several Canadian cases in which immigration consequences have been weighed in sexual-offence sentencings involving newcomers.?Therecord

Again, whatever else we think of Russel Brand, compare what happened to him with, well what you read on an X feed pretty much every day if you look for that sort of thing. This is not an injustice. This is the justice of a totally different system than the one people think they live in.

Thank you all for reading this site:

A few thoughts about Russia, Ukraine & Poland

 

(Before I make my case, and frankly it’s more of an open question than it is a case, I feel it’s important to point out one fact. If anyone chooses to read this, please do so with some caution. I am out of my wheelhouse here. But the video of the feminist group asking for an audit on Ukraine spending in this post doesn’t require any analysis from me. So watch that anyway and decide for yourselves what that means.
But I have dug my own rabbit hole here for anyone who is interested. Of course, any counter arguments or ideas to the contrary are most welcome. Pelase deliver them in the spirit this is written. Thinking out loud. Not prognosticating or in any way being didactic.)

I see Ukrainian flags everywhere in my city in Canada. From what I know, it is mostly on the homes and cars of leftists who have all the correct narrative views on everything. But one thing I absolutely do notice, is that never has there been a report of roving gangs of Russian thugs, torching cars or breaking windows of homes with the Ukrainian flags in or on them. But put an Israeli flag out and chances are you won’t even get an insurance pay out for what happens. And certainly not twice.

This is a meaningful stat. Interpret it how you will. But it sure seems like Russia and Russians are not the enemy they were made out to be by the state-media complex. But the Anti-Israel complex is indeed a state-media creation. Like the facts of Russia-Ukraine, they are non-existent on CBC. Just approved narrative attacks.

This video we post now and again because, well it shows how the people of the Donbas were treated by the Ukrainian state:

This is from 2014:

But here’s the October surprise, as it were, here in Canada. From what might be called a legacy feminist no less. From CPAC

 

She goes farther than simply accusing Carney of money laundering. She questions the moral authority of the war itself on its premise. She is decidedly contradicting the narrative of an “unprovoked aggression” by Russia. (Although personally I don’t like Jeffrey Sachs as a source, but he is only one of the sources she quotes, and I can’t remember why I don’t like him as one)

In 2018, President Trump went to Germany and spoke at a NATO summit, specifically warning Germany that they had made themselves totally dependant on Russian energy. In fact, Germany has torn down to the roots a brand new state of the art coal plant for electric generation that produced very little CO2 for those that believe this is a problem. Merkel signed the Nord Stream deal in 2015, and once the war was imminent, they did not allow delivery of LNG. But Germany, France etc. really did destroy their own energy production including nuclear, Which you know, doesn’t convert any carbon into gas form.

  • The dependency on Russian oil was built with full knowledge before the war — 2015 deal, Trump’s 2018 warning delivered to their faces at NATO, US sanctions on the project from December 2019, and Germany kept laying pipe anyway (construction resumed December 2020 despite sanctions).
  • They didn’t stop when they saw the war coming — pipeline finished September 2021 with troops already massing; even the certification freeze only came February 22, 2022, two days before the invasion, and even then it was Scholz, not Merkel (she left office December 2021).
  • Merkel defended the decision after the war started, with full knowledge of what it produced — “Nord Stream 2 was not a mistake,” “even in the Cold War, Russia was a reliable energy supplier.” She didn’t sin off on it post invasion. But that she still defended the policy in hindsight after seeing the invasion her policy funded. She had all the information in the world and said she’d do it again.
  • The invader’s revenue flowed regardless — NS2 never opened, but Germany kept buying through Nord Stream 1, the Polish and Ukrainian transit lines, and later LNG — ~€140 billion to Russia in the first year of the war. They built a second pipeline to double the money flow while being warned, and when it was blown up in September 2022, the flow just went through the other pipes.

Then we get to Poland today.

The European Union, which has an astonishing track record of destroying sovereignty, conning member states into surrendering self interest to faceless overpaid bureaucrats in the European Commission, and a litany of other crimes against culture and individuality like mass immigration of Muslims, seem to have managed to pull of a coup in Poland where a successful leader of Poland for the Polish people has been replaced with an EU sycophant.

And now suddenly, there are troops amassed on the Polish border with Russia, although that looks like it may have been a fairly normal response to a Russian military exercise. And given that a Russian military exercise immediately preceded the invasion of the Donbas, was probably a good idea.

Speaking with a knowledgeable Polish expat we know who speaks 5 languages fluently today, Her speculation was interesting.

Poland, I am told, now holds more gold than the European Central Bank. Around 632 tonnes. The ECB, 507.

  • Poland is Europe’s largest gold BUYER — by far. It added ~50 tonnes recently per the World Gold Council, holds the top spot on the biggest-increases list, and the NBP has approved a plan for up to 150 more tonnes, targeting 20%+ of reserves in gold and a stated goal around 700+ tonnes.
  • Poland is the largest holder in Central and Eastern Europe — Russia aside (and Russia’s ~2,300t is Asia-booked in most analyses since much is held in China/own vaults).
  • Poland is the only major European economy whose gold program is explicitly framed as insurance. Glapiski has said categorically: gold is held domestically in Polish vaults specifically because “in the event of a crisis, external markets could become inaccessible” — and Poland repatriated 100 tonnes from London in 2019.

Poland is also a hold out against the Euro. And the EU doesn’t like that at all. They recently suckered Bulgaria into switching to the Euro and our friends there are reporting massive increase in costs of living as a result.

And Poland now faces the EU’s excessive deficit procedure. And the EU is actively trying to hook Poland’s rearmament into EU financing: the SAFE-style EU loans come with a requirement that 65% of components come from EU/Ukraine-based companies — which deliberately excludes Poland’s two main suppliers, the US and South Korea (National Defense Magazine). Warsaw has been resisting: “Poland takes Brussels’s billions but wants US, Korean weapons.” So yes — there is a live EU effort to make Poland’s military build-up financially dependent on Brussels and to redirect the procurement to German/French industry.

It’s almost as if the EU/Germany was more concerned about screwing over Trump and the USA than its own survival. Getting Poland away from its independence through gold holdings, and forcing it to stop using the USA as its supplier of military equipment.

In terms of Tusk and his politics, The Guardian’s account and Politico’s both note the EU Commission immediately sided with Tusk. Which tells you a lot.

Here is some speculation sent in by another reader that the coup in Poland could be a precursor to Martial law there:

….could be a pretext to introduce martial law ???
=====================
Poland foils attempted ‘provocation’ on Russian border, PM Tusk says
====================
Großeinsatz in Polen an Grenze zu Kaliningrad
=================
Polnischer Spezialeinsatz an Grenze zu Kaliningrad
In any case, it was interesting to see leftist, feminist, albeit legacy 60s feminists, or, “first wave” as the following more clearly Marxist wave, speaking against the Ukrainian-Russian narrative.

Islam and RFK Jr.

1. Historian gives accurate and succinct breakdown of the nature of Islam:

RFK Jr. Manages to ignore scriptural, historical and contemporary Islamic reality and tweet this:

Full text:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
Leftist mainstream media outlets piled on this week to express outrage at my observation, during a speech in Grand Rapids for Mike Rogers, about the troubling dearth of scientific output from the world’s 22 Arab nations over the past five decades. These reporters —
@fatimathefatima

@AP
,
@Kanishka183

@Reuters
,
@rachel_roubein

@washingtonpost
,
@baylisswagner

@nytimes
,
@stevebenen

@MSNOWNews
— omitted critical context, presumably to bestow plausibility on their accusations that my statements were racist and Islamophobic.

However, my speech was not a critique of Arabs or Islam, but of Islamism (also known as “Islamofascism” or “Political Islam”), a toxic ideology conceived and promoted by the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood. Let’s see which reporters take the time to read this post and then correct their stories.

Criticizing Islamism is neither Islamophobic nor racist. Islamism is a violent corruption of mainstream Islam that summons adherents back to the seventh-century ideal of bloody jihad, the homicidal and suicidal religious zealotry that propelled a motley cadre of desert nomads to conquer half the world. Sheikh Ahmed El-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar — the Muslim equivalent of the Vatican and the highest authority in Sunni Islamic thought — has rejected Islamism as “false Islam” and a “perversion of the Islamic religion” and accused it of “barbaric crimes.”

Islamism is intensely anti-American, anti-Western, and hostile to modernity. It is explicitly contemptuous of democracy, constitutional government, capitalism, minority rights, gay rights, women’s rights, free speech, and virtually all personal freedoms. Its central aspiration is for a global caliphate ruled by a single theocratic despot with absolute power to impose sharia law that dictates every aspect of human conduct. The Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, Hassan al-Banna, taught that the highest aspiration for a Muslim was martyrdom in the achievement of that goal; the purpose of every Islamic nation is to “perfect the industry of death” until world domination is accomplished.

I pointed out in my speech that the Muslim Brotherhood’s antipathy for modernity is a dramatic departure from Islam’s historical affinity for science and learning. During the Muslim Golden Age, spanning the eighth through the fifteenth centuries, Muslim leaders dignified Islam’s wealth and power by promoting a brilliant flowering of innovation and scholarship in science, mathematics, philosophy, art, literature, astronomy, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, architecture, medicine, and navigation that continues to enrich the world today. Arab leaders fostered an intellectual ferment unmatched by any other in human history. A long line of enlightened caliphs assembled—and abundantly rewarded—an unparalleled galaxy of jurists, scientists, physicians, philosophers, musicians, artists, poets, and wits. Muslim rulers elevated the role of reason and tolerance, cultivating a milieu of religious and intellectual freedom—where Jews and Christians also flourished—and encouraged sages of various faiths and ethnicities to collaborate and freely exchange ideas.

For five centuries, Arabic was the world’s most learned and literary tongue and the lingua franca of science and scholarship. Most mosques had libraries (Córdoba hosted 600!). Muslim princes in the tenth century often had more books in their personal collections than existed in all of Europe. Baghdad had 100 bookstores in AD 891. England would have to wait another 420 years until 1309 to see paper for the first time.

Islam’s second Golden Age during the Ottoman Empire (1299–1922) birthed a cosmopolitan and pluralistic civilization centered in Constantinople that yielded additional bonanzas in poetry, music, art, and a tsunami of scientific innovation from coffee to water pumps, steam engines, gears, surgical scalpels and clamps, the first smallpox vaccine, and the cannons that allowed the Ottomans to dominate Europe to the gates of Vienna.

In 1928, six years after the Ottoman Empire collapsed, the Muslim Brotherhood began to spread its dark strain of violent fundamentalism from Egypt to Palestine and across the Muslim world. Islamism’s contagious proliferation ended the dialogue between Islam and the intellectual classes and demoted the role of reason in Islamic life. The Muslim Brotherhood’s principal philosopher, Sayyid Qutb, was contemptuous toward public education in science, math, and philosophy, believing that the only source of truth is the Koran. For Qutb, the purpose of education was not to celebrate life, or to nourish the intellect, but to indoctrinate children in the art of war, the glorification of death, and a blind obedience to an autocratic caliph.

Qutb railed against reason, which he considered the seed of apostasy. He sought to silence the humanities and viewed science as a sinister displacement of religion. He derided pluralism, rationalism, innovation, and tolerance. In doing so, he deprived Islam of its modern potential and its own greatest inheritance: the confidence to learn from the world, preserve its wisdom, and surpass it.

In his obituary for Muslim culture, The Closing of the Muslim Mind (2010), Robert R. Reilly recognizes that Qutb’s outlook dooms his followers to inertia. A religion that values obedience over initiative, that seeks to obviate independent reason, is a religion of violence. Where there is no framework for rational mediation, all disputes must be settled by force.

It didn’t worry Qutb that discouraging education in physics, mathematics, medicine, or engineering would atrophy intellectual and economic development in the Muslim world. Qutb explained that Muslim countries were so far behind the West in the sciences and technology that there was no hope to catch up. Muslims, he preached, should do what they do best—study the Koran and embrace martyrdom as the path for achieving global dominion: “The Muslim community today is neither capable of nor required to present before mankind great genius in material inventions, which would make the world bow its head before its supremacy.”

Qutb’s diatribe against Muslims competing in science and technology was nothing less than civilizational malpractice—especially given that he wrote it in 1964. Had Japan, Singapore, or South Korea accepted Qutb’s logic in 1964, they would have opted out of modernity. Instead, they chose to accept the challenge of competition. Their decision to engage has yielded stunning achievements that transformed their nations into economic and technological superpowers and enriched all of humanity.

The anti-intellectualism of Islamism—the rejection of evidence and the scientific method, the hostility toward objectivity, the suppression of contrary information, the deification of dogma, the embrace of pseudoscience, the contempt for reason as the path for discerning objective truth, and Islamism’s association of science with immorality—has helped close off the Islamic mind. The staggering metrics of intellectual and scholastic enfeeblement in Muslim nations attest to Islamism’s systematic squandering of human capital including the creative potential among the world’s two billion Muslims.

Korea issued 260,000 patents in 2024, while nine Arab countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, issued fewer than 10,000 in total, with 8,000 of these coming from a single nation—Saudi Arabia—which has made herculean efforts in recent years to de-Islamize its society. Japan, which represents about 1.5% of the world’s population and is practically devoid of natural resources, granted 306,855 patents in 2024 alone. There are 127 million Japanese, compared to 500 million Arabs.

According to Hillel Ofek’s 2011 analysis, there were a mere nine scientists, engineers, and technicians per thousand citizens in Islamic nations. The global average was forty-one. Among the 1,800 universities in Muslim nations, only 312 housed scholars who had published articles in journals.

Muslims represent 26% of the world’s population, and Muslim countries control half the world’s crude oil resources and 40% of natural gas resources. And yet the 53 Muslim countries combined publish only 5% of the world’s scientific literature. Hillel Ofek points to a 1989 study showing that in a single year, the United States published 10,481 frequently cited scientific papers, but during that same year, Arab countries published just four. A 2002 analysis of Arab science in Nature magazine identified only three scientific areas of excellence from Islamic countries: desalination, falconry, and camel reproduction. According to Nobel laureate physicist Steven Weinberg in 2011, “for forty years I have not seen a single paper by a physicist or astronomer working in a Muslim country that was worth reading.”

Contrast the Arabs’ dismal record of intellectual achievement in modern times with that of their closest cousins, the Jews, nearly all of whom live in democratic societies with laws that separate religion and politics.

Keep in mind that Jews, who number 15.8 million worldwide, represent a mere 0.2% of the world population. As of 2025, no Muslim has ever received the Nobel Prize in medicine or economics, and only four Muslim scientists—all living in Western democracies—have received the Nobel Prize in chemistry or physics. In contrast, some 200 Jews have received Nobel Prizes in science. About 26% of Nobel Prizes in math and science, 28% in medicine, 40% in economics, and 39% in chemistry have gone to Jews. Since 1901, some 22% of Nobel Prizes in all categories have gone to Jews.

Genocidal hatred against ALL Jews and Christians and other minorities is foundational to Islamism. Only in the West does Jew hatred pretend to require the alibi of Palestine or hide behind anti-Zionism. Muslim Brotherhood cosmology describes the universe as a cosmic, existential war between Islam and Jews that began with Muhammad and which only one side can survive. “Since Islam subdued them [in Medina],” Qutb warned, “they are unforgiving and fight furiously through conspiracies, intrigues, and also through proxies [the United States] who act in the darkness against all what Islam incorporates.” Islamist utopia will only emerge when every Jew is exterminated. Jews in Qutb’s theology are not just political adversaries, but perpetual and metaphysical evil. “The Jews,” he said, “are behind materialism, animal sexuality, the destruction of family, and the desolation of society.”

And Jewish genocide, for Islamism, is more than a theoretical aspiration. In 1948, the world’s 22 Arab nations were host to 750,000 Jews living in communities that predated Muhammad by 1,000 years. Today, there are virtually no Jews in those nations: Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Algeria, Yemen, Mauritania, Somalia, Sudan, Jordan, Gaza, or the PA-governed areas of the West Bank; in Nazi terminology, they are Judenrein: Jew-free. There are fewer than 1,000 Jews in Tunisia, down from 105,000. In 1948, Christian populations represented 20% of those nations; today they represent 4%. These are the real ongoing genocides of the Mideast.

Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime bonded with early Islamists over their shared Jew hatred. The Nazis became the principal funder of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1930s, and the Muslim Brotherhood operated propaganda, espionage, and sabotage operations for the Nazis during World War II. Joseph Goebbels and an army of Nazi and ex-Nazi propagandists built the Muslim Brotherhood’s powerful propaganda machine in the 1930s, ’40s, and ’50s. The massive influx of money from Iran and the Gulf States starting in the 1990s turned this operation into an amplifier of unmatched power that makes Goebbels look like a piker. A global propaganda barrage by this outfit has distracted Hamas’s Western dupes from Islamism’s authentic genocides by persuading them that Israel committed a genocide in Gaza, even though, according to the CIA Factbook, Gaza’s population has actually increased since October 7, 2023.

Islamism is genocidal against Christians and Jews, but among its most pitiful victims are the Arab societies that suffer the misfortune of living under its rule. Despite all their petroleum wealth, Muslim countries have slipped behind Asia and Latin America in virtually every metric of political freedom, technological progress, and social well-being. Islamism’s merger of politics and religion has robbed Islam of its intellectual vigor and doomed most Muslim populations to living in stifling tyrannies with little freedom to elucidate their thoughts and speech or fulfill their creative potential. Those countries are predictably stagnant, unable to evolve in the modern world. The dark shadow of fundamentalism over scholarship and progress has proven toxic to the Muslims’ transition to modernity. The very civilization that practiced tolerance and celebrated pluralism and dialogue, filled a thousand libraries with its books, gave the world observatories and universities, and stunning innovations in science, has become closed, aggrieved, and violent, and averse to reason, curiosity, freedom of inquiry, and scholarship.

All 22 Arab nations in the Mideast and North Africa are autocratic dictatorships. Almost all are apartheid states that legally restrict the rights of minorities. Gays in many of the nations are put to death. Under sharia law, women have little more rights than cattle. They live stunted lives behind veiled faces, enduring systematic servitude, legalized domestic violence, child marriage, chattel slavery, and public stoning for adultery, which is legal for their husbands. In September 2021, the Taliban made it illegal for girls to attend school after age 12. The Taliban’s Vice and Virtue law forbids women from speaking aloud in public.

If you want to understand the Muslim Brotherhood’s vision for society, look no further than Gaza. Hamas, which rules Gaza, is the Palestine branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Palestinians have received over 4X per capita in international aid than Europeans received under the Marshall Plan. (See Clawson 2002.) Europe used its money to rebuild 17 nations. Palestinians couldn’t build themselves even one. Under Hamas’s iron fist, Gaza squandered its share on bombs, weapons, extravagant salaries for its billionaire kingpins, and a billion-dollar bunker and tunnel system built for its warriors—but off-limits to its citizens. Gaza remains a stunted and stagnant, impoverished society under tyrannical oppression, with no free speech or other basic freedoms. Hamas governs through force, including brutal crackdowns on discourse, public executions of dissenters and collaborators, tight controls on humanitarian aid distribution, and onerous taxes on almost every activity. No elections have occurred since Hamas took over in 2007. Instead of building a nation, Hamas has transformed Gaza into a death cult wallowing in victimhood, nursing aggrievements, addicted to violence, resentments, and yearning for a seventh-century miasma. Hamas nurses Palestinian infants from birth on genocidal hatred of ALL Jews—not just Zionists—and indoctrinates children in the savagery and unspeakable barbarism that the world witnessed on October 7. Hamas shows its contempt for the Palestinian people by deploying them as child soldiers and civilian shields, and placing rocket launchers and ammo dumps in schools and hospitals. Hamas’s greatest strengths are its propaganda operation and its willingness to impose unlimited pain on its own population to achieve its ideological goals.

Islamist governments like Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah distract their populations from their misery by blaming the myriad social ills and the predictable government failures on scapegoats: Jews, Zionists, and America. They’ll have us believe that all their derelictions are the result of the evil Zionists, the “Little Satan” Israel, and the “Great Satan,” the U.S. And just as victimhood is paralyzing to personal growth, it deprives Islamist nations of national success by robbing its practitioners of agency. Islamism’s cult of victimhood and its coterminous abolition of self-criticism have stagnated global Islam and locked it in hatred, violence, brooding resentment, and isolationism. Referring to the Arab world, Fouad Ajami described this as “a political tradition of belligerent self-pity.”

Contrast Gaza’s failures with the successes of its closest neighbor, Israel, a tiny sliver of swamp and desert 1/600th the size of its Arab neighbors, that blossomed into an agricultural juggernaut and a global economic and technological superpower. Jews took one of the few places in the Mideast with no oil, gas, or other resources, and despite being surrounded by enemies, they nevertheless turned the barren landscape into a vibrant, pluralistic democracy where Jews and Arabs vote as they please; worship according to their convictions; serve beside each other in the judiciary, the army, and political leadership; and enjoy equal rights. Women and gays in Israel have all the rights of men, and Israel’s biggest annual celebration is the Pride parade in Tel Aviv. As the only democracy in the Mideast, Israel is a robust and heroic outpost for freedom and Western values.

And Israel is merely a nugget among the bounties bestowed by Jews on Western civilization. There is no ethnic or religious group that has contributed more than Jews to the welfare of humanity or to the advancement of liberal democracy. Jewish traditions of ethics and thinking have shaped Western civilization and global progress through foundational moral concepts, including our monotheistic Christian belief system with its roots in Judaism, milestone scientific breakthroughs, medical innovation, and innumerable cultural achievements in art, literature, education, health, and entertainment. Relative to their proportion of the population, the astonishing contributions by Jews have been breathtaking. An abbreviated list would include medical advances like the polio vaccine (Jonas Salk, Albert Sabin), chemotherapy and immunology (Paul Ehrlich), streptomycin and the age of antibiotics (Selman Waksman), penicillin (Ernest Chain), pacemakers (Paul Zoll), and blood typing (Karl Landsteiner).

In sciences, a short list of Jewish luminaries would include Albert Einstein (theory of relativity), Niels Bohr (quantum mechanics), and Paul Berg (first recombinant DNA molecule).

Jewish contributions to business and technology include Google (Sergey Brin), Meta (Mark Zuckerberg), Oracle (Larry Ellison), Salesforce (Marc Benioff), Intel (Andrew Grove), and Dell Technologies (Michael Dell).

Jews virtually created the American entertainment industry, including founding six of the eight major Hollywood studios responsible for 75% of the classic Golden Age movies. They also revolutionized laughter. A 1978 TIME magazine survey found that 80% of professional comedians were Jewish.

The major figures of twentieth-century Western thought—Jesus Christ, Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, and Karl Marx—were all Jewish. Twenty percent of philanthropic giving in the United States comes from Jews. Jews compose twenty-five percent of America’s most generous givers. They are overrepresented on lists of secular organizations that benefit human rights, social security, higher education, personal freedom, and constitutional rights. They represent 14% of doctors and 29% of psychiatrists. Their contributions to America’s global economic leadership include Salomon Brothers, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Blackstone, Wells Fargo, and Vanguard. In a rational universe, wouldn’t non-Jews be expected to celebrate these contributions with gratitude?

Now, here are some things that Jews don’t do: suicide bombings, rape gangs, beheading people, killing gay people, aspiring to kill all non-Muslims, forcing young girls to wed older men, lynching women for wearing makeup or showing hair, female mutilation, religious dictatorship, Christian genocide, polygamy, rioting and burning down cities, applying the death penalty for leaving Islam, cooking babies in ovens, hijacking airliners (and driving them into buildings), bombing buses and crowded restaurants, disfiguring girls with acid for failing to wear the hijab, operating modern slave markets where hereditary Black slaves are bought and sold by Arabs, advocating global jihad, and committing 90% of the terrorist acts globally.

These are the gifts that Islamism has bestowed on the world, along with closed minds, poverty, starvation, ignorance, oppression, and violence. This comparison begs the question, “Why does the world hate Jews and embrace Islamists?

The answer, of course, is a sophisticated mass propaganda campaign that ignores evidence and inverts reality to make Israel a global villain.

Looking at Islamism’s track record, seven nations with substantial Muslim populations—Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Syria, and Russia—have outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood, branding it as a terrorist organization. Kenya and Argentina have also banned the Brotherhood for fear of its impacts on their societies. The Brotherhood today sees its best opportunities for expansion as Western nations that are unequipped to deal with its tactics.

In 2004, the FBI discovered the U.S. Brotherhood’s archives in a Virginia basement, including a 1991 “Explanatory Memorandum” characterizing the Brotherhood’s work in America as “a kind of gradual Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.” Muslim Brotherhood documents describe this process of gradual infiltration as “gradualism,” “entryism,” or “Da’awa.”

In a 1995 speech in Toledo, Ohio, the Brotherhood’s leading cleric, Yusuf al-Waradawi, told his audience: “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’awa.” As a board member and outreach chair of a Muslim Brotherhood front group, Abdul El-Sayed ran a high-school recruitment program entitled “How to do effective Da’awa.”

The Muslim Brotherhood’s explicit written strategy for taking over Western nations is to broaden its appeal through a “red–green alliance” by adopting Leftist rhetoric and allying itself with liberals, socialists, and communists. This was the strategy first initiated by Yasser Arafat in the 1960s and then implemented by Muslim Brotherhood acolyte Ayatollah Khomeini during his 1979 Iranian Revolution, and later by Muslim Brother Mohammed Morsi during his 2011 color revolution in Egypt. After they gained power, the Leftists, in each case, learned that they were not actually Islamism’s partners, but only its useful idiots. Khomeini hunted down, jailed, and murdered his former Leftist and communist allies. Morsi sidelined his. A 2012 Arabic-language statement bearing Abdul Al-Sayed’s name backed Morsi’s presidency and urged him to “purge” the media and police.

Anyone wondering what America’s future looks like if the Muslim Brotherhood gets its way has only to look at France, where Islamist mobs of the red–green alliance, following the Muslim Brotherhood playbook, chant communist phrases, wave Palestinian flags, and vent their destructive hostility toward the West by destroying the iconic monuments of our shared civilizations.

Abdul El-Sayed mocks his critics as Islamophobic or anti-Arab racists when they inquire about his continued loyalties to the Muslim Brotherhood. But El-Sayed and his family have long and deep entanglements with the terrorist organization. A 20,000-word investigation by The Project for the Investigation of Terrorism documents El-Sayed’s two decades of intensive affiliations with the Muslim Brotherhood, and nearly every one of its legacy front groups that the Brotherhood set up in the U.S. to Islamify and destroy our democracy. That same organization recorded dozens of instances in recent years where Abdul El-Sayed has either directly lied about his relationship or refused to disavow the Muslim Brotherhood.

On Oct. 1, an Ohio voter became the latest to ask Al-Sayed to disavow the Brotherhood. Under persistent badgering before national news cameras, Al-Sayed finally caved: “Sure. Yeah, absolutely!” he said unconvincingly. He then spent five minutes attacking the man’s motives.

El-Sayed said nothing about the Brotherhood itself, its ideology, or the Muslim Brotherhood front organizations he works with. A disavowal that names nothing and condemns nothing is a disavowal in name only.

Why can’t El-Sayed give us a full-throated and detailed condemnation of this terror group, and disavow also its poisonous ideology without ambiguity? Why can’t he acknowledge that the Muslim Brotherhood is a despicable terror organization, and that Islamism and sharia law are anathema to American values? Americans shouldn’t have to worry whether a U.S. Senate candidate has loyalty to an ideology that openly hates our country and has vowed to destroy it.

While it’s nice to see someone in his position calling out some of the facts of Islam, allowing it to wear a disguise negates the value of telling some of the truth. Much like if during WWII we had been told to embrace Nazis but beware of Naziist extremists or Nazismist fundamentalism. We would never have fought back and been taken over with very little difficulty. ‘Nazis after all, are the leftist politics of peace. It was really only the extremists that are the problem and if you read Mein Kampf properly, or not at all, you will see that.’ Right? Am I right or am I right?

RAIR published a piece on why it never used the word, Islamism:

Best read at RAIR linked above. But Andrew Bostom came out with a direct refutation of the post here:

A short excerpt…

In a personal “X” account posting 10/30/26, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr (RFK Jr.) criticized “Islamism” as an alleged “toxic ideology” that he averred was a “violent corruption of mainstream Islam.” RFK Jr. invoked current Al-Azhar University Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayeb as an authoritative avatar of mainstream Islam to bolster his contention about “Islamism” as being somehow distinct from normative Islam:

“Sheikh Ahmed El-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar — the Muslim equivalent of the Vatican and the highest authority in Sunni Islamic thought — has rejected Islamism as ‘false Islam’ and a ‘perversion of the Islamic religion’ and accused it of ‘barbaric crimes.’”

Notwithstanding RFK Jr.’s assumptions, the invocation of Al-Azhar Grand Imam al-Tayeb completely undermines his false premise of “toxic Islamism” versus his imaginary Islam as an historical bastion of “reason and tolerance, cultivating a milieu of religious and intellectual freedom.”

Grand Imam al-Tayeb and Al-Azhar University in fact represent all the liberty-crushing totalitarianism, jihad bellicosity, and Sharia-bigotry of mainstream, authoritative Islam that RFK Jr. errantly decries as uniquely attributable to “Islamism,” and embodied by the bogeymen of the “Muslim Brotherhood.” The unbowdlerized public record of al-Tayeb, and Al-Azhar University reveals plainly his and Al-Azhar’s rejection of freedom of conscience and expression, sanctioning of traditional jihad war, and virulent, even annihilationist Islamic Jew-hatred.

During a 2016 interview, al-Tayeb reiterated his endorsement of the traditional Sharia-based rejection of freedom of conscience by sanctioning the killing of “apostates” from Islam because they were considered a “danger” to an Islamic society:

We could post a hundred videos from authoritative imams and Islamic leaders refuting this BS. As Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdo?an. said very clearly, “Islam is Islam is Islam”. He also said, Islam is sharia, sharia is Islam. Both these things are of critical importance to understand if there is any hope of pulling Western Civ out of the fire it put itself in.

But let me add our perspective here at Vlad.

One of the most common misunderstandings of Islam and European history is said by people who know enough about Islam to know it’s a problem, but not enough not to say the following:

‘The problem is, Islam has not had its reformation yet. It is still a young religion in its primitive state and needs its Martin Luther moment’. Or one of a dozen variants of that.

Here is why it’s wrong.

The protestant reformation was a reaction to the Catholic Church’s massive corruption at that stage. In fact it was somewhat similar to Islam, as the Church and its clergy would take money to give the faithful a ticket to heaven. Islam does that as a matter of doctrine. It isn’t even corrupt. It’s doctrinal Islam. Having watched maybe 100 videos asking for money from Muslims to build mosques in the West, they always mention that Mohammad made it clear that contributing to the building of mosques would guarantee you a place in the lascivious sky-brothel that is the Islamic paradise.

(sadaqah jariyah — “whoever builds a mosque for Allah, Allah will build for him a house in Paradise,” Bukhari and Muslim)

But for Catholics, that was corruption. So Martin Luther demanded a reformation of Christianity that would bring it back to its authentic teachings of Jesus and the Gospels as he understood them. So reformation meant the disassembly of a corrupted ideology and institution and a return to its original structure and philosophy.

Well Islam has had that.

The Islamic reformation was by the emergence of the Ikhwan or Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 which was specifically created to restore the Islamic Caliphate. After WW1, the Islamic empire, which controlled the entire Middle East and other areas was broken up and under control of the allies, A contract was forced on the Middle East breaking it up into modern nation states instead of the Caliphate that it was, and making generally speaking, minorities in charge of majority populations. The theory was, that then there couldn’t be a massive Sunni Vs. Shia genocide. That there would be a kind of equilibrium and life could go on for everyone more or less safely. But the Muslim Brotherhood was in fact starting to reform Islam back to its jihadi-Caliphate, Koranically and scripturally correct form which was exactly as Mohammad is reported to have done things. Islam as it is today is the reformed version. The few decades we enjoyed where Islam was staying in its own lane and enjoying Western (mostly Roman in nature) institutions and methodology, including a more rational system of laws, was being disassembled. Looking at photos from Iran and Afghanistan in the 1960s and now gives you the general idea.

 

Marseilles I believe this weekend but can’t tell yet

Poland uses Aristotle and Trudeau/Carney tactics, uses non-polish police to quell rightful protests against the Communist coup

We were reminded about this tactic being used at the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022. I walked along the side street the day after the state thugs cracked heads at Trudeau/Carney’s request under the illegally used, Emergency Measures act. Those fully anonymized police did not seem to be Canadian, and many of them were not speaking English or French to each other. If I had to bet, it would be Ukrainian.

There will be a lot more from a great source tomorrow hopefully

 

 

Several data points suggesting Europe is changing its posture towards it’s immediate future

The following was compiled by reader, Johnny U with much thanks!

It seems like a nascent mass-line narrative attack is quickly taking form. A general paranoia is setting in created from multiple angles. Perhaps the jangled nerves and untethered anxiety from the last few years have created a general form of ptsd. Rogue AI agents hacking everywhere, wars, economic deterioration, Europe’s riots–general chaos is surely highly efficacious for another government move on individual sovereignty. We can be certain of one thing: those behind the plandemic learned a lot from their experiment, and they are not yet finished.

Maybe some warnings are legitimate, but don’t tell me the Russians plan to invade Europe. Why would anyone want it?

Here are a few examples of what I mean. Is it malicious fear mongering or realistic preparation? I’d bet it’s both:
Glenn Beck:

Glenn Beck is a very entertaining Casandra. But gets it right often enough to be worth at least fact checking. And no, not holding him to account much higher standard. No one gets it always right unless they are the actual conductor of future events, and even then, things don’t always happen as expected. But Beck is one of the more interesting and well reasoned of the prognosticators.

The following video is from BBC itself:

Beck’s analysis makes more sense than the BBC one for sure. Typically leftist governments consider those who stockpile to be far right wing extremist scare mongering or whatever narrative attack they need to direct attention away or towards whatever it is they make up.But if the UK, Canada or EU nations are telling people to stockpile, the only thing we could probably make money betting on, is it won’t be for whatever reason they say it is. Global Warming for sure. Beck’s analysis that Europe has cut its own throat by destroying its own energy production is for sure the better reason. He should have added destroyed its own food production as Canada has done. If anyone needs a reminder of how, this interview we did with a Canadian farmer protesting the “Carbon tax” a few years ago should help explain it.

Some self appointed pundit using public source like FOX News

Some of these directives though, sound like they should be situ-normal. ALL of the West should probably have those new mini-nuclear reactors. The Egg and so on. But what is this, an issue with AI attacks? That would make some sense. My own network has told me about major hacks written by AI under prompt that require massive team effort by human code people to mitigate, protect against or otherwise fix that would otherwise result in a crisis of one kind or another. Either way centralized power is a bad idea. Ask anyone from the former Soviet Union.

Seattle News Tonight:

 

 

This speech by Macron should give a clear indication of the extent of Europe’s alliance with communist and Islamic revolutionaries

Please watch this speech by Emanuel Macron carefully. It is not very long and the important bit is at the start:

The details of its meaning are over at RAIR Foundation 

Quick post about a series of jihad attacks in Queens NY and why the response is guaranteed to ensure more of them

It’s been a busy day at Chez Tepes, but I did want to cross post this item.

A jihadi launched three attacks on the Jewish community of Queens NY and in one of them, murdered a woman as she walked along the street with her husband of 45 years.

The story is an interesting one. but the insight is at this article over at RAIR Foundation. The bottom line? Treating jihad, which is a fundamentally military problem as a law and order one is a guaranteed path to failure, and that is why leftist governments are doing it, and have been for some time now. Please read the article at RAIR.

If I had anything to add to the article at RAIR, it might be that it is worth noting how, in all the major jihad attacks in India, France, and elsewhere the terrorist group be it Pakistan’s ISI or the Islamic State or whatever other front for orthodox Islam claimed the attack that a proportion of the total resources allocated for the entire attack would be disproportionately used to attack a Jewish soft target. In India, it was the Chabad house. In France, if memory serves, it was a Jewish deli or some small business. On all of these occasions, had they not reallocated their people and various Ordnance to those specific attacks, their mass casualty attack would have been much higher. This data point should give some pretty solid indication of doctrinal Islamic antisemitism.

Senator Shane Jett on the Islamic Communist threat to the West

Here is an interview with Oklahoma State Senator, Shane Jett speaking directly to the threat to the West by the Islamic communist alliance. This was done in Ottawa at the Biker’s Church conference on the issue titled, “Are Christians Safe in Canada“.

Demands for sharia sent to schools in Scotland, Ireland and elsewhere attached to bomb threats

Getting it wrong on France, Spain and elsewhere – Who is really to blame?

First, let’s look at some material from Ottawa’s Freedom Convoy of 2022. A couple of things to take note of. They had street cleaning patrols. The streets were cleaner during the Freedom Convoy than the rest of the year before and after the Convoy.
Also crime went DOWN. Several Canadian military Veterans patrolled the Cenotaph at police request as well as the War Memorial on Elgin 24/7 to see that it was kept safe and clean. For this, some like Jeff Evely, where actually arrested, tried, and banned from entering Ottawa for quite a while.

Here is a HEAVILY sanitized CBC propaganda clip on the wierd, anonymized police used to attack the Freedom Convoy using the now officially illegal and unconstitutional Emergency Measures act:

CBC lies like a rug on this of course, making claims about Children used as human shields while actual live footage at the time showed nothing of the sort. Also CBC doesn’t show police pulling people out of trucks and beating them and leaving them cuffed in horrible positions in the -30C weather for extended periods.

Here is a little footage of the militarized anonymized police attack on the protestors on Feb. 18, 2022

There is aa lot more footage of the police abuse of peaceful protestors from that day. If you search YouTube or X though, you get enemy propaganda clips from CBC, CTV and Global with framing that is the opposite of what actually took place. Which should be no surprise to anyone who finds themselves reading this site.

So what does this have to do with France today? I mean, France and Canada, they are different countries. Right?

No. They aren’t. The West for the most part is under one supranational and transnational set of diktats. From the UN, the EU, and the WEF as well as the Fabians and other orgs we haven’t heard of. The Known unknowns. And really, what did they do at those Bilderberg meetings?

The plan is the same for all these countries, including the United States, although Trump put a brake on aspects of the planned demolition of the West by re-taking the borders. Which explains why there was I think, 5 or 6 attempts to murder him that we know of so far. He is a genuine obstacle to the new COMINTERN plot to destroy the West.

Police smashing windows and dragging people out of the trucks

Amer-Indian woman being trampled by police horses 

Some footage of the initial contact between massive amounts of anonymized state thugs and the peaceful, tidy and lawful protestors on Wellington St.

Now compare that to the total lack of response by the French state to these profoundly destructive revolutionary riots, largely by people who have no actual justification even for being in France in the De Jure sense. De facto, the state brought them in, and the state knew with certainty that they would do this exact thing. Remember when Notre Dame was burned down? It was an early narrative much like Covid. The ancient Oak beams used in the ceiling of the Cathedral apparently caught fire from a cigarette from a worker doing renovations. Only we spoke to a number of carpenters and contractors, all of which said that the older the oak, the harder it is to light and centuries old oak would need actual thermite to get it lit.

In fact here is a demonstration of just how hard it is to light old oak beams. The older, the more fire resistant it is.

France also banned or destroyed stockpiles of Hydroxychloroquine when in vivo use showed it would save people’s lives who had 1st gen Covid. They lied about the fire at Notre Dame. They utterly and completely failed to send an appropriate response to the revolution taking place on the streets this past week or more, and in contrast, Canada sent a response that was orders of magnitude greater than the situation called for in 2022. And why? Because those were legacy Canadians demanding the rights they had before the communist revolutionaries who actually run things now took over. And to make the revolution complete, they need to import millions who hate us and feel entitled to everything that we built, and at a certain point, let them or make them assert their dominance.

Covid, Notre Dame, the mRNA mandatory injections along with lockdowns and masks, Islamophobia narratives, Global Warming and an easy ten or more mass line narrative attacks used to destroy Western Civilization are nearing the end of their usefulness. Or better stated, they won’t need those kind of narratives anymore. In France and in Spain, its open street warfare by imported young male mostly Muslim migrants against an aging (thanks to feminism and leftist anti-family narrative attacks) and unarmed population. Also thanks to leftist narratives that the public should not be armed.

Last night there was this:

The four Olds of Mao: old ideas, old culture, old customs, and old habits

These are clearly under attack.

Here is Grok’s analysis of the way Churches were described in Orwell’s 1984:

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the old churches of London no longer serve any religious purpose. Organized religion has effectively disappeared under the Party, and the surviving church buildings have been either ruined or repurposed.?Online.flipbuilder

The clearest references come in Book One, Chapter 8, when Winston visits Mr. Charrington’s junk shop and sees an engraving of what he recognizes as a building near the Law Courts:

St. Clement’s Danes was bombed years earlier and is now a ruin. Winston had not known it had once been a church.
Mr. Charrington tells him, “There’s a lot of them left, really… though they’ve been put to other uses.”
St. Martin’s-in-the-Fields (still standing in Victory Square, the former Trafalgar Square) has been turned into a museum for propaganda displays—scale models of rocket bombs and Floating Fortresses, waxwork tableaux of enemy atrocities, and similar exhibits.?Rvb
Winston has never heard church bells ring in his lifetime. The old children’s rhyme beginning “Oranges and lemons, say the bells of St. Clement’s…” survives only as a half-remembered fragment among the elderly proles, evoking a lost London whose steeples are now “ghostly” and silent.

Later in the novel, Winston and Julia also meet in the belfry of a ruined church in the countryside, another example of these buildings existing only as empty shells of the past.

In short, the Party has erased the churches’ original function. What remains are ruins, state museums for war propaganda, or other non-religious uses, while the history of the buildings themselves has been obscured or rewritten so that the pre-revolutionary past cannot be reliably recovered from them.

We are watching the communist destruction of the West at end game. For now, the Churches will be replaced with mosques. Communists likely imagine that the Mosques are a temporary tactic to destroy Christianity and Judaism/Jews, and then the revolution will destroy them as well. but it won’t work out that way. The dialectical con of making people forget who they are, and stop defending themselves and resort to tribalism and attack each other over every conceivable issue, real or imagined, worked against Western people very well. We tribalized over every issue to the point that people will support politicians over only one issue like abortion, while letting everything else go right to hell. The Muslims don’t do that. They vote in blocks for one thing only. The advancement of Islam and Sharia. And even some of the more enlightened people do not yet understand or care about the threat this represents.

Main stream media is not covering the end of France, or even if it is just unprecedented rioting and destruction, at most it gets an en passant reference as “students upset about insufficient funding” or other narrative mass lines. But those watching on social media still do not get it. They lament, “Oh why did they let those immigrants in! Look at what they are doing! The French state is so stupid!”

Nope.

The French state bought them in to do exactly what they are doing. It’s a bitter pill to swallow. If you like, it is Hanlon’s Razor at scale. This is the public insisting to themselves that it is incompetence when it is indeed malice. Everything points to it going back to every leftist narrative that has been destructive to Western culture, civilization and nations. From Feminism to acid rain to global warming to making abortion a sacrament, gay marriage, the trans-narrative, right up to the Gaza ‘genocide’ each of which is to split the Western legacy population and culture into tribes and have us war with each other while Muslims, united in their doctrinal and violent hatred of all that is not ruled by sharia, gain dominance,.

[necessary addendum] We do not oppose homosexuals living under any arrangement they want. We believe in personal liberty. However marriage meant something specific and was for the betterment of the family. Something gay people cannot make, (or at least not by accident.) Civil Unions would have been a real solution to a minor-problem. But instead they chose to make the solution one which would deconstruct a central pillar of Western civilization. Redefining marriage to mean 2 men or 2 women, which then meant that marriage means nothing at all and now, depending on where, can mean whatever people want it to mean, so it means nothing and fewer and fewer people will commit to it. Especially men since, well frankly it is insane given the power imbalance to women today. So the issue is not removing rights from homosexuals, It is not using homosexual arrangements as a wrecking ball against the pillars of civilization.

About Rubio’s Greek Speak, Turley on the coming kinetic war in the US, life in jail for jihad means a few years and parole and France is still enjoying a communist/Islamic revolution: Links 1 for October 17, 2026

About yesterday’s announcement of the Tesla supercar… this is too funny not to post. Porche launched a new model on the same day. It didn’t look good

1. On October 7th, Sec. State Rubio gave a stirring speech in Athens on the importance of Western Civilization, its origins and threats it now faces. Diana West wrote this article pointing out the two rather considerable omissions in that speech.

2. Constitutional Lawyer, Jonathan Turley: “You Better Get Ready for … War”: Socialists Call for “War in the Streets” and the End of Capitalism

“You better get ready for … war.” Across the country, radicals are openly planning for the next stage of their movement, and notably, the Democratic establishment is not part of their plans. Despite the talk of a “Big Tent Party,” socialists are riding high on a surge of support and talking purges and revolution.

In Chicago, radicals gathered for a conference on Marxism during what many view as the heyday of socialism in the United States. The Democratic Socialists of America is now larger and more powerful than at any time in our history. Socialist candidates are winning elections across the country as Democratic establishment figures from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) to Gov. Gavin Newsom pander to the movement.

Speakers in Chicago used the conference to push supporters to the next stage in the movement, including some openly calling for violence and the end to capitalism.

University of California Santa Barbara History Professor Butch Ware said Democrats “must be destroyed” and urged attendees to be ready for “war in the streets.” Notably, in postings on X, Ware has said that candidates such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed are too restrained and are being pushed by the establishment “to contain radicalism.”

The professor “of Africa and Islam” whose faculty page is appropriately found under “bware” is the latest radical to dismiss the “Big Tent Party” rhetoric of establishment figures like Schumer. He declared, “The Democrats cannot be reasoned with. They must be destroyed.” There is little subtlety in the message, Ware has explained: “You cannot call yourself a revolutionary and not be talking about training with weapons.”

It is another example of the delusion that establishment Democrats have that they will be able to use these radicals to destroy their political enemies but not themselves.

3. Toronto 18 jihadi terror boss granted full parole

The Parole Board of Canada says the would-be terrorist who planned to bomb CSIS no longer shows signs of extremism

A ringleader of the failed Toronto 18 terror plot has been granted full parole after the Parole Board of Canada concluded he no longer shows “any signs of holding onto extremist beliefs or radical ideologies.”

Zakaria Amara helped recruit members of a group that planned to storm Parliament Hill and bomb several places across Toronto. He’s been on day parole with multiple conditions for the past four years, and the board moved his release forward after they reviewed his case last week.

The two-member panel says Amara, 41, demonstrated “positive change, both in attitude and behaviour” after taking a deradicalization process while he was in jail. The panel’s decision, which included redactions, says Amara wants to live in his own home, work a full-time job, attend a mosque, see family and participate in “appropriate leisure activities.”

It gets depressing to have to say these things. But saying he shows no signs of extremism means they don’t even stop to think for a second, “extremism of what exactly?” Also that he just wants to go to a mosque. There is not a single mosque that does not preach from Koran and Hadiths that demand total global Islamic manifest destiny. The prayer against Jews and Christians, Koran 1:7, is repeated at least 7 times a day in every mosque. Read the article linked above to the Sun. Life in Prison for a mass casualty plan now means a few years inside and then parole to go back to the same ideology that put you there. Until people realize that Islam is the problem, and this is so easily demonstrated by its history, its canonical teachings, modern events taking place across the non-Islamic world and sermons within mosques world wide, not to mention published documents by the most authoritative Muslims in the world such as Tantawi, we don’t stand a chance.

“The problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam”. -Sam Harris.

4. I don’t think the importance of this can be overstated. Not only have national borders been utterly negated, they have been reversed. Our state, not our government in any usual sense but Carney, the EU, China and the WEF etc. which are the true rulers of Canadians and creators of policy, have reversed the borders and are actively bringing in millions of unvetted migrants from parts of the world who have radically different values than classical Canada does. The seeming hypocrisy is so large it can’t be properly described to those who choose not to look without those who are simply stating facts in evidence seeming to be complete lunatics or ‘conspiracy nuts’. This is the demoralization Yuri Bezmenov speaks about of course.

5. Is Hollywood pivoting away from Global Warming back to Nuclear Winter, or at least a variant of it? One may think so, especially as they use gay and authoritative black people to explain it to us. Is this just a random disaster movie plot? or a new mass line narrative attack/active measure. It would be interesting to watch people deeply committed to Anthropogenic Global Warming pivot back to Nuclear winter if we hadn’t already seen it happen from Nuclear Winter to Global warming. Maybe once they clear the snow off their solar panels and save up enough trickle power to watch TV they may change narratives. The one thing that is true though, is that colder temperatures, even by a couple of degrees, means real disaster. Mass starvation and death. If Global Warming was real, that would actually create better conditions for life on Earth.

6. Here is an hour and change of recent footage of the communist-Islamic revolution in France. May as well call it what it is or it makes no sense at all. RAIR details it here.

Geert Wilders offers this:

Thank you all for checking out this site.

UK at end game, border guard leaks: Links 1 for Oct. 16, 2026

1. Worthy podcast by Raymond Ibrahim. In this 80 minute podcast, Raymond actually goes in to a lot of the detail about Islamic beliefs which are important to know for those who actually are trying to understand it for the purposes of debate or any other. There are certain islamic ubiquitously used deceptions Muslims use when trying to convince or assuage peoples fears about Islam which are addressed here. For example, Muslims often say they worship Jesus as well. But of course it’s a totally rewritten Jesus for Islamic purposes, and bears no relation to the Christian or Biblical Jesus. But he explains in detail that according to islamic eschatology, when Jesus returns he comes to abrogate one of the three choices Islam gives to the unbeliever nations and states. Namely convert, pay the Jizya tax in a humiliating way, or die in jihad wars. When Jesus returns, the Jizya options are abrogated and Christians are faced with convert or die.

2. The UK is at endgame.

3. People know about this I’m sure, and opinions about it are 100% predictable. Canadians and others with TDS will pretend that this was only done for political revenge or some other purpose by Trump despite the fact the investigation started under Biden. Those of us that have followed her and the rest of the DemocRAT pack already knew much of her criminal activities, and I bet there are billions in money laundering and fraud via the Somali community in her state.

But this is a bit of fun ‘related’ news.

4. This talk is very important for two reasons. The first is because its both a nearly accurate description of what happened in Iran and what is happening now in Canada, across the West and very possibly even in the US, and secondly because the use of the word, “Islamism” or “Islamists” instead of Islam or Muslims moves the muzzle away from the target just enough to not actually do any good.

Actually this brings me to a second related point. The first being that there is no such thing as Islamism, Islamists or other variations that may exist which create the illusion that there is some narrow warped type of Islam that is responsible for jihad. This notion is created by a second fallacy, that Islam is in need of some kind of reformation, invoking the misunderstanding of the Protestant reformation.

The protestant reformation was the idea that the Catholic Church had strayed from its original purpose and teachings and had become corrupt. I don’t think that is much in dispute since Jesus never sold indulgences as far as I know. But the Muslims did in fact have a reformation. It was the Muslim Brotherhood. The MB DID reform Islam back to its roots in exactly the way Martin Luther did to Christianity. The difference is just that Islam is authentically an ideology of violent global manifest destiny. After WW1, Islam was somewhat domesticated. But the Ikwan (Muslim Brotherhood) returned it to its authentic and original doctrinal canon and teachings.

When you speak as this woman does, and one who at least appears to be too young to remember the Iranian revolution, started by communists and finished by Muslims, and use terms that perpetuate the myth of “Islamic Extremists” you work for the enemy whether you know it or not.

5. Here are a couple of related posts to #4.

Daniel Greenfield: Manhattan Jewish Anti-Israel Activists Try a ‘Two-State Solution’ with Hamas supporters on Oct 7

Here we see how the Islamic factor in the communist revolution is actually racing past the end game to enforce antisemitism against even Jewish useful idiots who stand with the communists. And leaping ahead here, my guess is those Jewish useful idiots will not learn from this experience. Any Jewish leftist that didn’t figure out at least the Islamic part of the equation after Oct. 7, 2026 will not ever get it. They are more loyal to their ideology than to change it based on personal consequences of them.

A group of liberal Jews opposed to Israel had invited Zohran Mamdani to an Oct 7 vigil. The vigil was supposed to show why Israel’s war on Hamas was cruel, senseless and wrong.

Instead, the vigil became an object lesson in why Israel exists and why it must fight.

Israelis for Peace, whose logo is a dove in flight, had booed marchers at Israel’s parade in New York City, and gathered at Union Square not long after the attacks to protest Israel’s military campaign against Hamas while brandishing signs like “How Many Children Is It Okay to Kill”.

By joining the small group’s vigil, Mamdani had hoped to defuse claims of antisemitism and to boost the reputation of the handful of anti-Israel activists who, contrary to the group’s name, included veteran non-Israeli activists like Rachel Timoner: best known as Schumer’s ‘rabbi’.

When Mamdani showed up, he was surrounded by more extremist clergy, including Jill Jacobs, a longtime activist who leads the T’ruah anti-Israel group, Sharon Kleinbaum, the co-founder of New York Jewish Agenda with Timoner, once accused of reciting prayers for Hamas terrorists, and Ellen Lippmann, an activist in a series of radical anti-Israel groups including T’ruah, J Street and Jews for Racial and Economic Justice. None of them were actually ‘Israelis’.

Please read the rest at the source. It will flesh out the Iranian revolution in important ways. Also this Prof. Jonathon Turley article about how the US left is now openly calling for violent revolution to overthrow “capitalism” and Democrats. Worth the read. For Canadians, it is worth asking oneself what would happen if any non-Communist wrote an article asking non-communists or non-Muslims to even just prepare themselves for violent revolution with a potentially violent response. It would certainly be reframed for your court case into something else. Related to all this, is this interview with a Spanish Border guard whistle blower. He explains how the Spanish state and media is part and parcel of the invasion of Spain by the Moroccan military along with what Daniel Greenfield in many articles calls, “Military Colonists”.

Military Colonists are what you see now at many hotel chains across the West, as our government now is bringing in uncounted thousands of military age men mixed with trained military personnel for a purpose people simply cannot let themselves believe.

Here is a partner article to the Spanish Whistleblower linked above. This one from Manchester UK:

Here are 6 of the 21 questions. The whole interview can be read at the source link.

COMPLETE INTERVIEW — ALL 21 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Q1: Thank you for agreeing to meet with me. Please tell me a little bit about yourself.

A: I hold a position within Border Control based at Manchester Airport. We report to a Regional Director, who then reports directly to the Director General of Border Control and Immigration, who then of course reports directly to the Home Secretary.

Q2: How long have you been with Border Control?

A: I have been with Border Control for twenty?one years, which includes service with Customs as well. I have worked at various locations, but I have been based at Manchester Airport for the last six years.

Q3: You’ve been with Border Control for a long time — tell me a little bit about the role that you undertake.

A: We have a quite diverse operation. This includes Immigration — checking that those who come into our country are legally allowed to be here, and checking their visa status. But we also look at packages and carry out Customs checks on all items. We look for any unusual shipments — ranging from contraband, Class A drugs, to weapons. In fact, we look for anything that should not be legally brought into the UK.

Q4: It sounds like quite a diverse and exciting role.

A: Well, not really. It becomes more of a standard job — you go to work, you come home, you relax, and you go back to work again. It sounds exciting, but it’s not — because a lot of it is process?driven, and in the main it can be quite mundane. However, what does get complicated is the way that we report our findings through to senior management. We have had a lot of issues in the past, and I believe that Manchester Airport is one of the most poor?performing airports in the UK — long queues, slow processing — simply down to lack of personnel and management structure.

Q5: I understand. So tell me — why have you approached us with information you feel is important for the public to hear?

A: I’ve come to you because I’ve watched your work over the last four or five years. Often you just don’t know who to trust. However, watching what you do — and seeing the information you put in the public domain — it’s clear that you have an understanding, honesty, and respect for what is right and wrong, morally and ethically, in our country. I find it difficult to understand how the mainstream media doesn’t pick this up — and it’s left to people like you to try and give it publicity. I do not trust any mainstream media outlets — including GB News.

Q6: So tell me — why don’t you trust the mainstream media?

A: Quite clearly, they have an agenda. They push a political narrative which is promoted by the Government. You have to be a fool not to see that clearly. But also — the likes of GB News pick up stories, and I would call them “fake patriots” — people who have their own agenda, often for financial gain or worse — they could just be a mouthpiece for the Government. That’s why it’s difficult to trust even the so?called alternative media. A lot of my colleagues just laugh about it — watching the news report almost unilaterally pushing one single message. And what really irritates me most is those people who call themselves “patriots” — who clearly demonstrate they haven’t got a clue — apart from how to fill their own pockets.

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Elon Musk is either an alien, or he is getting large incremental tech from them.

Seriously though, this is the same tech he uses to make his rocket stages land on ships the right way up at the next level. Very freaking cool.

Italian city enjoys new Sharia council and courts

1. Article at RAIR Foundation: Sharia courts created and operating in Italy. This is not an extremist thing. This is not a rare thing. This is the sole purpose and intention of Islam. There is no division between sharia law and its implementation and islam. Islam is sharia, and Sharia is Islam. Actually don’t listen to me saying it. Listen to the Turkish Islamic leader Erdogan:

And in case you think that is just a political leader speaking to his own crowd, maybe listen to Dr. Haitham al-Haddad. And in case you think he is just another bearded wierdy he is:

PhD in Islamic Jurisprudence (SOAS, University of London, thesis submitted 2010) – Focused on “A Critical Analysis of Selected Aspects of Sunni Muslim Minority Fiqh, with Particular Reference to Contemporary Britain.”?

Bachelor’s degree in Shar?‘ah and Law – From the University of Omdurman, Sudan.?Islam21c

Degree in Engineering / BSc (Computer Science or related) – From King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) in Saudi Arabia.?Islam21c

He also studied ‘Islamic sciences’ for many years under scholars including the late Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ibn Baz, holds classical ij?z?t, and has long served as a judge/jurist on UK and European Islamic Sharia councils (e.g., Islamic Council of Europe).?

Therefore:

Anyone who is enjoying a massively growing islamic presence in your nations, cities, towns and neighbourhoods can expect an increase in sharia law observance, firstly by the faithful, and then enforced sharia against the legacy populations and cultures of those same cities, towns and neighbourhoods. Clear? Good.

Islamic values are NOT Canadian values or any other values but Islamic.