“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
The remain in Canada arguments should be excellent exercises in creative sophistry and appeal to emotion. Could be instructive in an emergency for anyone.
Start time should be 8:00 ET but anyone joining later should be able to scroll back to the start.
UPDATE: At 8:36 PM ET the pro-Canada side used the “racism” dialectic. That is a great example of both sophistry and appeal to emotion.
Emergency alerts has just been sent to everyone’s phone in the area. I don’t know if its all Montreal or just the area!
Best Live Links Right Now:
Official sources (check these for confirmed updates):
(they usually post official statements)
UPDATE AS OF 1:54 PM ET
Confirmed Casualties:1 Police Officer — killed (died from wounds).
1 Additional Police Officer — injured (condition varies in reports, some say critical).
1 Civilian — wounded.
Suspect — “neutralized” (killed) by police.
What Happened:Shooting started around 11:30 a.m. near Courtrai Avenue & Trans Island / Décarie area, close to PA Westbury grocery store.
Suspect was armed and exchanged fire with police (reports mention camouflage clothing and shooting from an elevated position).
Heavy police response, helicopters, dogs, and a wide shelter-in-place emergency alert.
The area has a large Orthodox Jewish community, with kosher restaurants and institutions nearby.
Suspect Identification:No name or detailed identity released yet.
Police have not publicly identified the shooter. The investigation is still very active, and they’re reviewing surveillance footage and witness statements.Current Status:Scene is still secured.
No confirmed motive at this time.
Some early speculation on X about possible targeted antisemitic attack given the location, but nothing official supports that yet.
Good Live Sources:Montreal Gazette live updates: https://montrealgazette.com/news/breaking-two-montreal-police-officers-shot-in-cote-des-neiges/
CTV News / CBC Montreal coverage
SPVM official statements (they’re updating gradually)
If anyone for a single moment thought Ontario Premiere Doug Ford was opposing this plan, note how he leapt in at the end to actually bolster the entire agenda to destroy Canadian identity and economy by stating “…and that’s why we have to build more homes.”
That was pure pretend opposition. The answer is of course, Remigration. Send all the people here not based on a vetted procedure for Canada and Canadians benefit back to point of origin. Not destroying all our farm land and wildlife habitat to build government funded houses and Soviet like high rises with taxes and printed money. Homes for people who for the most part, have zero miscibility with Canadian culture or Western Civilization, and many of whom actually work three shifts to destroy it.
Doug Ford has always been a Conservative mask on a useful idiot it would appear.
Although Carney himself answers questions in this interview in typical Emperor’s New Clothes fashion, in other words, incomprehensibly but in a way that makes you feel that you are the stupid one if you don’t pretend to understand admire its wisdom, the initial question and the nature of the person who asks the question makes it all very clear. Why did Carney agree to be interviewed by Irish Communist, Alex White SC. A former Labour Party politician.
Fist, for those that don’t know who Antonio Gramsci is, look at this very brief summary in Key Wiki:
Antonio Gramsci (January 22, 1891 – April 27, 1937) was an Italian political theorist and founding member and onetime leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s theories have quietly been incorporated into American culture for at least 50 years. Gramsci believed that the way to incorporate Marxism in capitalist societies was best achieved from the bottom up by stealthily changing the beliefs of the culture itself, called “cultural hegemony.” Cultural hegemony involves softening, or radicalizing, the culture’s beliefs about various social issues such as homosexuality, marriage, education, women’s issues, religion, divorce, pornography, media, abortion and established political parties. The idea is to move everything to the left so that eventually new norms are rooted into society – a Gramsci form of the Overton Window if you will…[1]
Gramsci Symposium
The College of Arts and Letters at Michigan State University hosted “Gramsci Now: Cultural and Political Theory,” an international symposium to mark the 70th anniversary of the death of Antonio Gramsci, November 9-11, 2007 in East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Presenters were: Stanley Aronowitz, Joseph Buttigieg, Kate Crehan, Roberto Dainotto, Michael Denning, Benedetto Fontana, Stephen Gill, Marcia Landy, Guido Liguori, Frank Rosengarten, David Ruccio, Epifanio San Juan[2].
References
Communist Antonio Gramsci Resides In The White House NewsReal Blog, Nov. 24, 2010
http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org/communications/news.html
As an interesting aside, Pete Buttigieg, who was US secretary of Transportation under Biden (Obama’s 3rd term) was the son of Joseph Biden, who was the founding president of the International Gramsci Society, and spent much of his academic career translating and editing the definitive English edition of Gramsci’s prison diaries. He was a Marxist prof. of literature at Notre Dame.
So for Carney to be discussing accomplishing Gramsci’s vision with an Irish communist, well as the expression goes, “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” -John Heywood, 1546.
I haven’t made it all the way through this yet. But here is the entire video from which that except was taken in case anyone wants to know if there is a contextual conflict between my claims and the entire speech.
1. Law Prof. Bruce Pardy speaks to how the state in Canada treated the Freedom convoy and its supporters are half of the equation proving that Canada was, is and is becoming an increasingly totalitarian authoritarian state.
On occasion one may find oneself in debate with leftists over the Freedom Convoy. So far, I have never had a disagreement with anyone who was actually in attendance. In fact I know of people who vehemently disagreed with the Convoy at the time until they were made to go and check it out in person, at which point, they admitted they had been lied to about it. However, all the people I have had this disagreement with, watch CBC, CTV and Global.
2. I found this interesting an a couple of levels. For one thing, I didn’t know she was talking about the UK till very far into the video. Which shows you that galloping statism, tyranny, is a Commonwealth wide issue. Not just Canada or the UK or Australia etc. But also because there is one point with which I very much disagree. She says this is not a new problem but has been developing over hundreds of years. This is not true. This is the result 100% of relatively recent efforts, maybe over 100 or so years by communist think tanks like The Frankfurt School, Runnymede Trust, The Fabian Society, the WEF, almost certainly the secret meetings of Bilderberg etc.
The battle between state power and individual power is indeed an ancient one. But the destruction of Republics, which basically formed after WW2 in the West is a recent effort, even if it has historical ties and precedents.
She also appears to be wearing a Catholic Rosary. Which kinda confirms that the only people willing to risk their personal liberty and safety for the rights of all of us, tend to be those who believe in God. Those who believe life is all you get, tend not to put themselves out for others like she is.
3. Similar stories in the West are quite common. This is because Muslim women are taught that the only virtue they can have is by supporting Islamic precepts, and the practice of Islamic precepts.
4. Can’t stress this importance of this enough, both to the UK and to Canada.
Note the dry contempt with which the Judge reads a Tweet, and then interprets it in a way to make it criminal and worthy of two years in prison.
The United States may have to give the same access to enter for British, Canadian and Australian people as they did once to Cubans.
Stephen Coughlin once, when at the curious meetings of the OSCE asked specifically if truth could be hate speech. This was May, of 2015. PLEASE pay close attention. This was clearly predicted by Maj. Coughlin and many others 11 years ago and earlier.
We are not posting it as an “I told ya so!” but because often when the prediction and model used for it is paired with the results down the road, it helps to cement it home what has actually happened. This is a very hard pill for many to swallow. Probably not people who read this site, but for sure the friends and family of those who read this site. We are attempting to provide data points to help enough people come around before the panopticon is complete. Which is very soon. To hopefully mobilize people into some kind of action that will stop and reverse the galloping tyranny and destruction of our nation-states, as well as the total deracination of our identities.
5. On this last one, I argued with Grok for quite a while on its veracity. The way it is filmed, graded and edited, I was pretty sure it was fake. It has the classic Hollywood, Orange and teal set design and colour grading. I love that look, but it’s better reserved for fiction as that is its purpose in a way. To help people ease into a narrative. The camera angles and so on. But Grok assured me this is real and provided me with the links to the data to prove it.
So once again, another massive conspiracy theory which we are all shouted down for, becomes fact.
And now I really wanna know more about tick borne illnesses.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
This particular post feels like a kind of end game statement in a way. And in a way it is, This is the evidence that much of what we have claimed is happening, has now happened. As the statement at the Gates of Vienna says, “We are in a new phase of a very old war”. This is true. But this particular phase may mean that the normal means of defending one’s individual identity only exist as mirages, when they seem to exist at all.
Once again, we may have to look at the Egyptian example where the people took to the streets in 2011, and stayed there till they deposed a tyrant, not once, but twice within a short period. The first protests lasted from January 25th to February 11. The second round to depose Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammad Morsi, was in June/July of 2013. Both protests being around the same length as the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, but with a LOT more people. But then the people have to have a cost benefit to motivate them to take to the streets like that, which the current communist state apparatus may be too clever to allow to occur.
A few days ago we posted an interview for RAIR Foundation with one of the lawyers of the JCCF, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms in Western Canada. We discussed bill C-34, yet another bill to protect children by taking away all the privacy and liberty of adults, while simultaneously creating mechanisms which would allow powers of arrest for “hate speech” where hate speech will of course, be dialectically determined. In other words, to the benefit of state power, and to the ultimate detriment of all of us.
In case you haven’t seen that interview yet, here it is again below.
Here are a few thoughts from the Twitterati on the matter.
I might be able to save you time on the above video. The answer to the question was long, monotonous, and contained no information whatsoever.
What we can say though. is that Canadian federal and other government data bases are hacked constantly, in fact so much so, one wonders if it isn’t part of a previous more informal “strategic partnership” with China, and going forward, they won’t need to ‘hack’ it because part of our “strategic partnership”, which actually means the integration of systems, means the systems are integrated and no ‘hacking is needed’. Speculative, but consistent with reality. Those of you that have faced the Long Form Census maybe should wonder if the fine and jail is worth not giving up all that information. It feels a little like rape answering those questions to a state that hates you.
This guy is interesting though:
For those of you over 60, you may remember these:
Screenshot
After maybe looking up what those things are, for those that don’t remember, also look up the word, Samizdat.
Short discussion with lawyer from the JCCF on some of the more outrageous, (even though voted down ultimately) aspects of some of Canada’s most totalitarian legislation.
Interview with Luke Neilson
Please read this post over at RAIR about the MAC Convention in Toronto and know two additional things.
MAC as an organization receives ongoing federal funding (hundreds of thousands to millions over the years, including a larger $349k grant in 2021 for anti-racism work)
Secondly, that the Ottawa Government went to great pains to shut down a film a few years ago at the Ottawa Public Library which was a factual documentary about the consequences of mass Islamic importation into Europe. The movie was called, Killing Europe. And various state agents within the municipal government of Ottawa went to great efforts to shut it down.
Killing Europe is below:
After various agents associated with both the Ottawa council and one or another “Human Rights Commission” (clearly not considering freedom of speech to be a human right) the same film maker made another documentary about how his first one had been shut down, where he exposed the various agents involved, we have tactfully not named in this article.
This post is a microcosm of how things now work across the West — especially in the Commonwealth, Germany, France, and much of Western Europe.
Add in the definition of dialectics from the daily Reader’s Links, and the picture becomes complete. It is a big ask to watch two films, but when you consider when they were made (killing Europe: 2017 and Killing Canada: 2018) and read the RAIR piece, the jigsaw feels complete. What we are living through is the culmination of decades of deliberate effort by leftist agencies: the systematic disempowerment of the individual and the elevation of the State to near-God status — a State that decides what is true, what may be said, and what must be punished.
It is a big ask to watch two films. But when you think about when they were made, and look at the post at RAIR it forms a pretty well completed jigsaw. There have been things at work for decades culminating in what is here and what will grow, shaped mostly via empowering small minded people by making certain thoughts either outright criminal, or worthy of social ostracism.
All moves take society to the left.
All dialectic attacks move society to the left.
All new laws take society to the left.
Taking things to the left means the disempowering of the individual and creating a near God-like state that can determine what is true and not true and enforce those narratives as suits their agenda at any given moment.
Islam is one of their primary cudgels. And in a few years from now, what legacy Canadians remain might look at the last 20 years with a great deal of sympathy for Harp Seal pups. We shall know what it is to be clubbed.
Secure messaging service Signal yesterday became the latest company to warn that Bill C-22, the lawful access bill, could force it to leave the Canadian market rather than comply with provisions it says would compromise its end-to-end encryption and create new cybersecurity risks. Signal vice-president Udbhav Tiwari told the Globe and Mail that the company “would rather pull out of the country than be compelled to compromise on the privacy promises we have made to our users.” The comments are part of a steady stream of similar warnings from Apple, Meta, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Cybersecurity Advisors Network, and the chairs of the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs Committees. Despite growing concern, the government’s response has been to launch a misleading social media campaign and repeatedly insist that the experts and companies are mistaken.
The pattern will be familiar for anyone who lived through the Online News Act. Supporters of then-Bill C-18 dismissed warnings from Meta and Google that the bill’s mandated payments for news links were unworkable and that they would comply by blocking the links in Canada. Witnesses confidently told Senate committees that the companies were bluffing and that, “when legislated to do so, they will come to the table.” But by the end of summer 2023, Meta had stripped news links from Facebook and Instagram, an approach that continues to this day.
The government’s defence of Bill C-22 follows much the same script. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has accused the U.S. tech giants of “misinterpreting” his bill and his department insists the legislation is “encryption-neutral.” When Apple released a statement warning that the bill “could allow the Canadian government to force companies to break encryption by inserting backdoors into their products, something Apple will never do,” officials replied that it “categorically rejected” the claims. When the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs chairs wrote that providers of end-to-end encryption “will inevitably face directives to create backdoors and architectural changes that bypass or weaken encryption,” the minister’s spokesperson said the letter reflected “a misunderstanding of how Bill C-22 would function in practice.” When Signal said it would leave, it responded that the concerns regarding installing capabilities to enable surveillance are false. In other words, the government thinks everyone is wrong and the risk of market exits are overblown.
Read the rest at the link above please.
This morning, while perusing the pretend-random YouTube feed that comes up on my sandboxed YT app, I decided to watch one titled, “Why AI agents are either the best or worst thing we’ve ever built“.
It was pretty much what you may expect if you have watched a bunch of videos on AI but slightly better than average in presentation. It wasn’t political, or philosophical at all. That is until about 7 minutes in. Then the philosophical issue of agency came up. The argument ran that instead of the more or less 1950 sci-fi imaginings of a human brain/agency and robot bodies, which we have had pretty much for decades now, we are switching to robot brains/agency and human bodies.
She brought on a guest. A philosopher, Niklas Lönnblad. I can’t tell between her accent and his name being strongly Scandinavian. Then it got interesting from our PoV.
Without using the term, ‘game-theory’ he started out by defining an aspect of it. The issue of limited time and resources hence each agency, be it a person or a state would necessarily prioritize for what goals needed to be addressed while ignoring the rest due to lack of actual agency/agents.
Time and agency will be removed from the equations of life, which means a fundamental shift. All animals factor in the time and effort required to achieve a goal. Imagine what would happen if that wasn’t a factor, and a Marxist state deployed that kind of game-change.
The example they used was, if suddenly the state, which they refer to as the government, were suddenly able, through the use of AI agents, to ticket EVERY car that went 1 KM over a speed limit, you would, as he put it, have a dictatorship within a democracy.
We clearly, clearly are approaching that exact example now without even having AI. Just speed cameras and regular old computers sending tickets to people who go over the limit based on licence plate connection to the car owner.
But the concept is worth extrapolating on, because it will be the case. The state can essentially criminalize everything and arrest or otherwise hurt any given person based on what the actual priorities of the state are, rather than a criminal justice hierarchy of crime.
In other words, they can know any minor infraction you did, and then arrest you because you denied Global Warming, or insisted on biological reality of human sexual dimorphism.
And again, this already happened in the Soviet Union as painstakingly detailed in the Gulag Archipelago decades before there were computers. Or even cell phones. But AI actually extends agency to the state to infinity. This will change a lot of equations. And might explain why Mark Carney was so adamant about building massive AI server farms as (at one point) his main campaign platform, while also BSing everyone that they all insisted on large amounts of “green electrical supply”. A lie anyone who bothered to think about it for a moment could see through instantly. No company ever cared where its power came from.
In the following excerpt from the video, the examples given of course are banal. But I would ask anyone interested enough to read this, or watch the video to extrapolate. See where this has already happened, or how it will be applied. As Mark Twain said, “History does not repeat itself. but it does Rhyme”.
“I’m not sure how to feel about this. So, we have autonomous AI agents already out there hiring humans to do their bidding, which sounds like the plot of a very bad science fiction film. But I called up my friend, the philosopher Niklas Lönnblad.
Nice, I’m so excited I get to talk to you about this. Likewise. Have you been playing around with OpenCLR? Of course I have, absolutely.
He had a different way to think about this:
Well, I think autonomy is widely overvalued, because autonomy means that it does what it wants. And we’re nowhere near designing bots that have a will of their own or agency of their own.
We call them agents, but they’re really delegates. Nature develops agency first. Intelligence is a resulting effect or emergent effect of the looping of agencies.
And then that’s how you get intelligence. Whereas we’ve done it sort of really backwards with the artificial intelligence project, where we build intelligence first. And then we’re now sort of going back to figuring out, can we do agency? What we want is to be able to delegate and extend our agency in different ways.
I think that will present a whole different class of problems for us. The troubling thing then isn’t yet that AI has too much agency, it’s that we do. Almost all societies are premised on the fact that agency is scarce.
Attention is scarce. We’re limited by time. Take a super simple example, like there is a concert and the tickets are being released.
You have people queuing up to get to this concert. And this queue works why? It works because there’s a limited amount of attention, time and agency that people can spend. Now, imagine a world in which you
can tell your agents that if there’s any concerts by this particular band and I want a ticket, so queue up for me virtually.
Suddenly there’s like this abundance of agency and the queue breaks. Think about a society where everybody can will 10 times more, 100 times more, 1000 times more. What does that mean if we increase the amount of will in society? A lot of our other concepts like justice depend on this too.
Because now flip the coin and imagine that the government has abundant agency, infinite agency. And suddenly every single violation of the law can be enforced. So imagine, for example, every time you speed and you’re three or four or five kilometres or miles per hour over the limit, you’re automatically issued a ticket.
There’s something about this full enforcement of the law through abundant government agency that actually comes very close to a dictatorship, although we’re still in a democracy. Abundant agency in the hands of governments is potentially terrifying. But what about in the hands of an individual? Because one thing that you can say about humans is that we have no shortage of ideas.
What we have is a shortage of time and energy and frankly, the will to deal with the admin. Cass (the name of the AI agent they built, short for Casandra and is the name the AI agent picked for itself) has none of those problems. And so we thought what is the most ambitious thing that we could ask her to do? Not fix a pothole, not buy paperclips.”
It continues with an interesting idea about using it to create destructive propaganda. Their example is about trying to crash a stock. People might figure it out eventually, but by then the damage is done. This also is a perfect reflection of Western nation’s reality since 2020 or before. Covid, the vaxx, global warming, all of it was Maoist mass line narrative attacks, intended to create an effect. The state becomes less interested in preserving the narrative itself once the goal, which is the damage that is done to the target, has been achieved. At 12:50 more or less, she describes tasking an AI agent to create a mass line narrative attack in order to tank a stock. Again, extrapolate forwards, and interpolate backwards to see how this was already done to damage individualism. What is the multiplier on this effect AI will have, going forwards?
She also touches on another of Stephen Coughlin’s themes. Ultimately, the damage is done to trust in the systems altogether. This is what Stephen calls, “The liquification of reality”. A total destruction of our own ability to make decisions on any of the information coming our way.
(As a complete aside, for anyone looking for a temporary solution to the immediate problem of same, it is easy. Stop watching TV and stop listening to news on radio. Especially in Canada. For people who say, “Where will I get my news” the answer is easy, You are not getting news now. For information, search X. When you see anything interesting, query Grok, X’s AI agent as to the date and trtuth of the Tweet in question. So far I have found it to be on the whole, very good for that.)
Interestingly Canada is still preserving the Trans-narrative attack in spades, along with several others. Many thinkers are claiming that Canada is dropping the Global Warming narrative attack because no one believes it anymore.
Untrue on both counts. The elbows up crowd still chant it like life depends on it, and the state doesn’t give a rats kidney if people believe it or not. They are happy to have their useful idiots out on the street pushing these narratives, but they don’t care who believes them. They just care that people are afraid to oppose them. Because, as we often say, “with the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.” -David Horowitz Obama’s Rules for Revolution/Diana West.
Arguing against the narratives is ignoring the intent of them. And inadvertently working for the enemy, unless one includes the telos of the narrative. The effect the narrative will have on individualism and classical thought.
On to the list of indicators of the state of Western nations:
1. A decent example of Canada moving from a nation of rule of law to a dialectically driven, narrative based state
Click through to read the entire commentary.
2. Multiculturalism in Spain is going as expected
Also comments under that one.
3. This, like similar programs, are great for getting a few people that don’t already know what is happening with Islam especially in Gaza to wake up to the facts. People who are committed to the Islamic and ‘Palestinian’ cause of course, would just agree with the training and propaganda. it would make no difference to them. but at the end of the day, none of that matters. What does matter is: A: Do we have faith in our own right to exist, our culture, our beliefs, our history and B: are we ready to fight for it with the requisite amount of force and sacrifice to win.
Generally speaking I would say no. Most do not believe in either, and those that do believe in A are not ready to believe in B.
4. Ezra follows up with the whole Rocket Launch pad con that the Fed Guv and the socialist Nova Scotia provincial government set up. Of course most news that bothers to report on this at all, say, CBC, CTV and Global, IF they bother to write on this, will frame it as incompetence, or at worst corruption. But what they won’t ever say, is where the money goes. I would argue it goes to hotels and caterers who house, feed and otherwise pander to all the needs of the endless supply of Africans and Muslims being brought in to Canada and housed at Holiday Inns (at least one I know of in Ottawa’s East End) to replace liberty minded Canadians and deracinate Canadian-ness.
5. The political state of Canada. Watch all of these for a decent snapshot of how Carney and the WEF/Bilderberg revolution is coming along.
I wonder if the USA will have an issue with Canada deciding that Taiwan is rightfully Chinese now.
Passed Fact Check:
Thank you all for checking out this site.
A little something to add to the pile of the Global Warming narrative damage data.
Lastly, PLEASE if you are in or near Ottawa on Tuesday, don’t forget about this event!
There will be a Town-Hall with all the speakers in a panel and I think taking questions from the public Tuesday evening as well. The location is very central to downtown and there is parking not far away.
Every word he says is accurate as far as we can recall. If anyone finds an error please post it in the comments.
RFK Jr. offered a few words on Canada’s MAiD program as well.
Although the following thing seems relatively trivial, it goes to the deracination of Canadian history and culture.
Some of you might have seen photos in the banner of a number of guards in front of the Governor General’s estates in Ottawa taken a couple of years ago at a Changing of the Guard ceremony. It used to take place every and all summer with some frequency. It did not happen last year at it appears that it will not this year, as the little guard huts placed in front of the GG gates are no longer there.
The banner photos show the traditional Bear Skin tall hats (now synthetic) the guards wear and the bright red tunics and black pants they wore as well as some with a Scottish military Kilt on other guards.
We will check if this still takes place downtown, but even that ceremony, the main one, was scaled back dramatically last time we checked.
Before even watching this video, please go over to RAIR Foundation and read the fundamentals of this situation. A man who was a prisoner of the Communist Chinese due to arbitrary arrest, as a Canadian Diplomat! was purely retaliatory for putting the daughter of a Chinese military general and owner of Huawei under house arrest for a while.
In the person of Mr. Kovrig, we have a rare combination of understanding at the strategic level, diplomatic experience in both good and bad ways, (as a prisoner in China) and as we see in this video below, also an understanding of the philosophical threat that China presents.
“The critical thing to understand […] is that Western countries, particularly democracies have policies and plans. (the) Chinese Communist Party has narratives. And the narrative it is trying to build is of inevitable preeminence and centrality in shaping both its region and ultimately world order.”
That, is the New. World. Order that Carney is proud of joining.
UPDATE: RAIR Foundation has a lot more on this story!
For those who don’t yet know, the dialectical enemy propaganda organization, the Southern Poverty Law Centre, has been formally indicted for fraud. They collected money from .. I am trying to find an adjective that is not also a pejorative in this case, let’s go with ‘concerned citizens’ to stop “extremism and hate” while in fact literally funding the Ku Klux Klan. According to FOX, they were also funding “National Socialists movement”. In other words, freaking Nazis.
Having followed these communist SOBs for many years now, we have done the odd article including secret video released of one of their meetings where they admit the real objective. To destroy classical America.
Tucker Carlson even did a good segment on them before he kinda… effectively… you know…
In 2018, the John Birch society did a video exposing the SPLC for what it really did. Attack any non-communist group or any Conservative group or any group that was a threat to the Islamo-communist plans for the United States using the now overly familiar dialectical labels of “hate” “intolerance” etc. ad inf.
Below, a video from 2018 by a Christian group that had their event cancelled because of pressure from the SPLC. Please note who did the agitation to shut them down, and who the SPLC was siding with:
So in the US, The SPLC was partnered with ANTIFA, and CAIR, and in Canada, the SPLC North, CAHN, is partnered with CAIR Canada, or the NCCM.
That is something we at VTB and others have repeated about them for years and years.
But The United States has now actually formally pressed charges against them. The joy one should feel, especially perhaps if one is from the left as the left represents itself, is enormous. But as a Canadian I am reminded of something I read back in the 80s. I have no idea if it is true exactly, but I know in principle it is.
“At any given time, there are over 100 elected representatives in jail in the United States.”
I remember reflecting that it is interesting that this is a badge of great honour for America. In Canada, no elected representative ever goes to jail for anything at all. This doesn’t mean none of our reps are criminal. It means we do not have anything like a republic. There is no equality before the law. There is nothing in Canada even approximating a republic. What Canada has instead of equality, is sanctimony. And that is not a substitute.
Canada has its own version of the SPLC. It is headed by an odious fellow named Bernie Farber. He in fact claimed that Neo-Nazi literature was found at the Freedom Convoy. A narrative that was widely amplified by the main state propaganda network, Comrades before Citizens, better known as the CBC.
In fact the pamphlet in question was from a years older march in Florida.
Here are some of the connections between the SPLC and the Canadian Anti-Hate network:
Confirmed Connections Direct Funding:
The SPLC provided $25,000 as seed/start-up funding to help establish the Canadian Anti-Hate Network. This has been reported by Ezra Levant (Rebel News) and others, and has not been credibly disputed by CAHN.
Partnership / Modeling: Multiple sources describe CAHN as being modeled after the SPLC and acting as its Canadian counterpart or “partner.” The Federalist (2019) explicitly referred to CAHN as an “Anti-Hate Southern Poverty Law Center Partner.”
Ideological and Operational Alignment: Bernie Farber (founding chair of CAHN) and the SPLC have collaborated for years on “hate group” monitoring, reporting, and public advocacy. Farber has been quoted by the SPLC and has appeared in joint or aligned efforts against what both organizations label as “far-right” or “hate” groups in North America.
Shared Tactics: Both organizations use similar methodologies — publishing “hate maps,” monitoring individuals and groups they define as extremist, and advocating for deplatforming, funding cuts, and legal pressure against their targets.
Background on the People/OrganizationsBernie Farber:
Former CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress, now founding chair emeritus of CAHN. He is a prominent Canadian Jewish activist who has long focused on fighting antisemitism and far-right extremism. Critics (especially on the right) accuse him and CAHN of being overly broad in their definition of “hate,” often targeting conservative Christians, critics of mass immigration, and opponents of certain Islamist ideologies.
In fact, CAIR Canada, now called NCCM (National Council of Canadian Muslims) hired or asked Farber to give a presentation at Ottawa City Hall on Islamophobia several years ago. Something Farber is curiously worried about above and beyond antisemitism, except where antisemitism is a useful device to devalue Conservative groups the AHN targets.
Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN): Founded in 2018 in Toronto. It monitors and reports on what it considers far-right and hate groups in Canada. It receives some federal Canadian government funding and has been controversial for its aggressive stance against those it calls, “right-wing figures and organizations”.
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC): The well-known U.S.-based organization famous (and controversial) for its “Hate Map” and lawsuits against extremist groups. It has faced significant criticism and legal setbacks in recent years for its expansive labeling practices.
Summary of the RelationshipThe SPLC and CAHN/Bernie Farber have a documented financial, ideological, and operational relationship. The SPLC helped fund CAHN’s creation, and the two groups function as aligned organizations with overlapping goals and tactics in the “anti-hate” space.
It is a very safe bet that no similar indictments will be levelled against the Canadian Antti-Hate network. Like elected reps in Canada, they are above the law, especially if they are working against Classical Canada. And the CAHN most certainly does.
For those who have not seen Michael Hansen’s excellent film, Killing Canada, banned from the Ottawa Public Library, there is also a very good and well researched segment on the CAHN that should be seen. Below is the whole movie. Perhaps later I’ll excerpt that section. But the whole film is well worth the time. It was filmed shortly before the Communist Revolution of 2020.
The Brilliant German Substack writer, Eugyppius also has an article on these indictments. You can read it here.
In a comment on this post, I was reminded that a fine group of young patriots, who were in fact very much classical liberals, were destroyed and made illegal by the Canadian parliament BY UNANIMOUS vote, called the Proud Boys. They are well featured in the Hanson movie above, including interviews with the leadership in Ottawa. All of the impetus to do this to them came from the CAHN. All of it was lies. Again, this is as much an indictment of the Canadian “Conservative” party as it is the Liberals, as one expects this from the Liberals.
At no point did the Parliament of Canada attempt to make ANTIFA a terrorist group as they did the Proud boys, even though ANTIFA is in fact a terrorist group by any rational definition, and the Proud Boys merely defended Canadians from ANTIFA.
The details:
The Parliamentary Motion (January 26, 2021)
The Canadian House of Commons passed a non-binding motion calling on the government to designate the Proud Boys as a terrorist entity.
This motion was passed unanimously by unanimous consent (no recorded vote needed, as no one objected).
The Actual Designation (February 3, 2021)
The final decision to add the Proud Boys to Canada’s list of terrorist entities was made by the federal government(specifically Public Safety Minister Bill Blair under the Trudeau government), not by a parliamentary vote.
This was an executive action under the Criminal Code, not a vote in Parliament.
There was no parliamentary vote on the actual listing itself.
So while the symbolic motion in the House of Commons was unanimous, the legal designation of the Proud Boys as a terrorist entity was a government decision, not a parliamentary vote requiring unanimity.
Once again we see that the Conservative Party of Canada is a Potemkin veneer of Canadian values and more a lubricant to the communist revolution than an opponent of it.
First. Diana Fox Carney:
Now this one will look like a stretch to skeptics. But we can all take comfort in knowing when it becomes ubiquitous and the new normal, the skeptics will all say it was obvious.
Please note where it lists the name of the Government department on this stupid and unnecessary weather alert in Ottawa:
Ben Bankas has a message for Americans.
‘Don’t let your babies grow up to be Canadians’
The following videos are the speeches given on Parliament Hill on March 12th by Constitutional lawyers, pastors, Members of Federal Parliament, activists and the head of the Christian Heritage Party concerning Bill C9. One of a tranche of totalitarian bills aimed at eviscerating all the most basic rights of anything like a republic in Canada. Speech which counters any state narrative will be actually criminal, instead of the extra judicial punishments the state has used so far such as doxxing and use of Jacobins like ANTIFA to punish those dare oppose each or any narrative attack.
Please watch them all. Each of these speakers covers a component of the issue. Spread them around to those you know that are unaware of the problem, or are on the fence on the issue.
Write up on each speaker at RAIR Foundation.
1. Christine Van Guyn. Canadian Constitutional Lawyer, interim Director.
2. Rod Taylor: Christian Democrat Party leader
3. Rev. Joel Dykstra: United Reformed Church
4. Colin Postma
5. Paul Lawton: Dir. Grass Roots Action for Upper canada
6. MP Jacob Mantle plus 8 other MPs (Cons,)
7. MP Andrew Lawton: