Category Archives: irrational leftism

Videos from yesterday’s press conference on the March for Life today in Ottawa

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Please see the detailed description for each speaker at RAIR Foundation 

Ruth Robert:

George Buscemi:

Jack Fonseca: (If you only have time for one, please make it this one. This one deals with the censorship being applied to those who have counter-abortion views. Once the state takes this power for one issue, well… ah… Covid. Right? Anyone even remember what happened to people who tried to warn against lockdowns or the vaxx when it still mattered?

Josie Luetke:

Pete Baklinski:

The videos are presented here in the exact opposite order that they spoke (in the pouring rain) Yesterday on Parliament Hill.

We could write an essay about how with the left the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point, but no time. In point form, once the state has taken the power to limit your rights, either for the collective good or for health reasons, then that is a power that will become the new normal for all issues where the state has ambitions against the public’s interests and rights. It is never about the issue, although they may seek the desired outcome of the issue as they spin it.

Start listening to Mark Carney and how he uses climate and net zero to obliterate Canadian industry when he is made PM. And he will be. And he will do it.

 

Further to our little rant about taxation…

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Some days ago this site published our opinion on what taxation really means in a world where states like Canada and the US just print all the money they want. Essentially, it means they have all the money they ever need to make policy they want work, and then blame lack of taxation for denying funding, like for veterans and health care etc. In simpler terms, taxation is a con. Canada and the US make up money. They never balance the books in any meaningful way, and they are currently enacting policies that would bankrupt anything in a week or less if they used a real economic model based on responsible spending and tax collection. Canada’s centuryinitiative.ca and America’s invasion of the Southern border alone is proof of this assertion, let alone the cost of the US military and alphabet agencies.

It was a rant so no real proof was submitted beyond the obvious, which is stated above here.

And what follows, isn’t really proof either. But it might constitute a data point. Assuming the man is who it is claimed he is:

I mean that has to be some random guy in the waiting room at Biden’s Dementia clinic, right?

Whoops nope its him.

 

It’s time to take up the fight for the rights of the Metabolically Challeneged

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Sometime early this week, a woman brought a cardio-disabled man into a bank to sign over his bank account to his caretaker.

The teller refused to allow the transaction, despite the signature he did, right in front of the teller, on the mere fact that the man was completely non-responsive.

This kind of injustice has gone on far too long. So we ask our readership to please sign the petition to give long denied rights to the decomposers.

The time is now, because while they have all the time in the world, we, the fully respiratory, or ‘Cis-breathies’ do not. We would like to see this teller removed from her position, and made to write an apology for all the deceased who would have liked to take out a loan.

Justice for the Breathless now

 

Post-Script:

Many years ago now, I told myself that I would no longer make jokes of logical extremes, because they just give tyrants ideas. Life in Canada now actually is a joke of logical extremes as you can see from the previous post about gay transvestites who identify as police officers.

But some things you can’t resist. And as I wrote this last bit of humour for the day, I fully accept that I will probably live long enough to be grimacing at how this gag turns into another dialectic.

One Quebec town is implementing QR codes for exit

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Please watch this video and add it to the events described in the previous post to get a decent sense of the state Canada is in at this stage of the authoritarian revolution which has been implemented for some years now.

Read some story details here please.

Perfect example of intersectionality

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Two words the dialectical left use we need to understand.

“Intersectionality”, and “queer”.

We understand the word queer to mean gay or better, homosexual. But it has been repurposed by the left to mean a kind of corralling of all deviant sexual identities to weaponize them as battering rams against classical civilization and healthy values. Intersectionality, means the point at which various dialectic attacks which are on the surface quite different such as feminism and Islam, but both have the intention of destroying the West. This may be given different names in order to hide the intention somewhat, like “the patriarchy” or “Dar al Harb” the world of war where the infidels rule. But intersectionality is where all groups no matter how different work together to the same purpose.

Below, is just too good an example not to post.

For a much better explanation of the nature of Queer as a concept, please search out James Lindsay’s video on the subject. If I get time, I will add it to this post later on.

It’s not hypocrisy, and it isn’t corruption

Posted on by — 5 Comments ↓

At this point its past undeniable that a communist revolution has taken place in North America, and frankly over a great deal of what was Western Civilization overall.

It has become so obvious that the word communism as an adjective for various events and policies, which mere months to a few years ago caused grimacing and smirks in all listeners, has now become a common descriptor, even among the less aware commenters out there. (No offence meant to the linked hosts. They point out important aspects of the revolution and show clips of Trudeau that all need to see)

A large part of this revolution has been the imposition of pseudo-realities, and forcing people to play along with them. This strategy has been applied to everything from immigration to covid to the created Trans-issue and the created climate ‘crisis’.

Governments across the world are rapidly criminalizing expressing opposing views to government dialectics on things like Global Warming using the ‘hate-speech’ catch-all.

Opposing one of these efforts is what made Jordan Peterson famous and influential. He came on the scene because as a Prof. at U of T, he objected to being forced to use pronouns that people chose for themselves. He referred to this as compelled speech. A much more severe form of communist control than mere censorship. And of course he was entirely correct, even if he himself could not see through the same strategy as it applied to Covid and the Vaxx.

As a commenter said below this excellent example of the captured institution, Scientific American under its article on Gender:

“If a man wants to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to him.

If that man wants me to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to me.

No actually it isn’t. It is now up to the state. This is an excellent juxtaposition of Socratic thinking Vs. Hegelian. Anyone who likely reads this site would find what he said to be a pithy and accurate description of the nature of free thought. One actually worth fighting over. Which it certainly is. But in order to do that and win, we need to understand where we actually are now on a political map. And where we are on that map is well demonstrated on the Scientific American article to which the tweet above is a Response:

One of the complains quite often made on this site is when people confuse hypocrisy with dialectics. The difference is subtle, and yet it isn’t.

Here is a fumbly attempt to explain the difference:

Hypocrisy, like corruption, all exist within a single overarching system. Corruption is when a person or group takes advantage of a position, or weakness within the system to advantage themselves in some way.

Hypocrisy is similar. A person speaks or even leads people in a way that indicates self sacrifice, or claims to behave in a way that results in delayed gratification, or advocates for other morally superior behaviours, while in secret they behave in exactly the way they advise others not to do. In both examples, the hypocrites and the corrupt require our Western system to be intact, in order to take advantage of it.

But the system we all knew and grew up with has been replaced with another one.

Therefore, the advocates of that system are not corrupt. They are in fact ideologically pure, but of another system altogether.  They may, and usually do, speak in a way that lets their fellow travellers know what they really mean and intend, (with Trudeau being an excellent example), while knowing full well how the uninitiated will understand their words.

For example, when Trudeau says that those who will not take the mRNA gene therapy shots are racist, misogynists who take up space, he is really saying they are counter-revolutionaries and must be eliminated, or at least their views must be, with the people who refuse government directives being marginalized and disenfranchised. No travel, no leaving or entering Canada, no restaurant access etc.

As an example of what corruption actually is or better, corruption Vs. revolution, The MAFIA requires that the banks and other institutions work as they always have as they need a place to store their own wealth. They need to know that they can build their own homes with cement that will not fall apart after 6 months. They need to know that the cancer that they often are on civilization, does not fully metastasize. Because organized crime, even regular crime for that matter needs a healthy host.

I read a story recently about gangs of people in the US robbing stores, and opening their own sidewalk stores to sell the goods they just stole. I couldn’t help but wonder when gangs will rob those sidewalk shops and set up their own shops with that same merch another block away.

Now while that would make for a decent comedy sketch, we all know why it won’t happen.

The initial robbers who stole the merch from the legal owners, are unencumbered by the rules that stop actual legal merchants from using force against thieves.

In other words, you can rob from the stores with total impunity in many places in the US. Leftist places. Blue cities and states. But try and steal from the thieves and you will be hurt badly or killed.

The following Tweet by president Trump is a powerful indicator of how the courts and justice overall is now dialect as opposed to, well justice based.

The trial isn’t rigged. Trials no longer do what we all thought they did.

Courts, like the CPSO hearings, like the Helen Grus hearings, like many many processes in the Western World which have been captured have re-tuned their entire process to create a pre-determined political outcome, and no longer exist to determine what is true, or lawful or in the interests of society as a whole.

It is no longer using evidence and reason to a rational outcome, but a needed outcome that determines what reasoning and evidence will be allowed.

Looking at the take-over of the Columbia U campus, and other campuses by leftists and Muslims:

We all know that if anything even 10% as antisocial as this happened by Trump supporters what would happen. Or people opposed to Trudeau mandates in Ottawa. What is being permitted on campuses, like what was permitted in 2020 in Seattle and in many cities where the Marxist revolutionary group wearing a beard of Black victimhood called BLM is not hypocrisy.

It is the product of a fundamentally changed system. We need to understand this going forward.

This means there is no changing things back to individual rights and a truth based system by using the system, even if there are partial and occasional victories in the courts.

We need to see first how those victories translate into policy that actually is put into effect to know if our institutions still have any meaning as we thought, and many still think they do.

We, as freedom minded people, as classical liberals perhaps, as believers in the rights of the individual including the right to private property, and raise our children according to our own values, cannot develop effective tactics if we cannot understand the enemy strategy, and more importantly or at least more immediately, know where we are on the game board and what stage of the game is being played.

Senator Babet in Australia does a decent job of listing some of the dialectic attacks for which their system is being re-tuned. Censorship is the new normal now. It has been for decades really, but its enforcement is now overt and exponentially more common. The focus is the same though. Again, David Suzuki and Nuclear Winter as a stunning example of how dozens if not hundreds of hours of TV appearances by Canada’s Fruit Fly Scientist who was banging a drum daily about how Western industry would block out the sun and cause an ice age, are impossible to find. Al Jolson videos from the 1920s. But nothing from Suzuki’s Nuclear Winter narrative attacks from the 1970s. There was video tape by then. Two kinds.

Full text:

Canada does an excellent job of demonstrating dialectical enforcement of protests for or against narrative positions:

Gender identity protestors face arrest in BC if law bans demonstrating at schools

British Columbia’s NDP government is considering new legislation that makes it illegal to demonstrate within 20 metres of school grounds to block gender identity curriculum protests.

Premier David Eby said that the Ministry of Education “has documented 18 major disruptions” of protests at schools in the province since the start of the 2023-24 school year, which he claims disrupt educational activities and intimidate students. 

“We’ve had people banging on school windows in British Columbia,” he said.

“It never crossed my mind to be worried that a grown adult would be waiting on the school perimeter to yell at my child about pornographic books or about puberty blockers,” added Eby.

 

In fact, the Government of BC is passing a law creating bubble zones around schools in the same way the Fed Guv did around abortion clinics.

Laws which are enforced strictly enough that a man who stood with a sign which merely read: “Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of our civilization” was arrested for holding it across the street and yards down the block from an abortion facility. And now, you won’t be able to protest the state sterilizing your own children near a school. Interestingly, both policies have the same outcome. No babies. Quell Coincidence non?

Meanwhile, at NYU

Columbia U:

Not Hypocrisy.

Revolution.

Chip Roy, and what he is missing

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Seems that Chip Roy is about 60% of the way to figuring it out. But clearly has not got it all.

Not going into how and why both sides of the house are making everything worse, because in effect, that is all this whole website is about. The capture of institutions by the COMINTERN and the move from Socratic methods of determining and utilizing objective truth, to a Hegelian one of imposing a pseudo-reality on the public, and punishing both legally and extra-legally anyone who won’t obey that pseudo-reality for being a counter-revolutionary.

What I do want to go into, is taxes. More and more it is clear that governments pretend to use tax dollars as the fuel for their programs. In fact they use taxes to punish the middle class while creating the illusion of rational (read microeconomic theory) financing. The juxtaposition I like for Canada is this one:

When Trudeau doesn’t like a relatively low cost program:

Meanwhile, Trudeau seems to be financing this semi-official program called, The Century Initiative. This is the plan to bring Canada’s population up to 100,000,000 people by the end of the century, and they are ahead of schedule, having brought in another million people to Canada since Stats Canada CELEBRATED an official population of 40,000,000 people just a few months ago. Note the stunningly propaganda nature of this Stats-Canada video. This was never the purpose of Stats-Can. It was to coldly report facts in an unbiased way in order to help determine policy for the future. A Socratic epistemology. First figure out the truth, then apply the truth in a way that makes things better until you have a better truth. That is not what Stats-Can is now. The video below is pure propaganda and a central department of state pushing a policy, rather than reporting on the population and showing how the numbers were determined.

 

Nearly all of these people are from Africa and the middle East. Few have the resources to live in a country like Canada where heat is expensive and mandatory for survival. Many have lots of children. And one gets the impression that Children in Canada are expensive, especially if you have to obey all the rules and laws that apply to children, such as car seats and so on. So it kinda sorta looks like 2/3rds of the nation’s new citizens will be funded by the state to one degree or another, while veterans who want proper medical care for damage taken in the military will not be funded ‘for lack of available funds’.

So beyond the clear illusion of taxation as a necessary part of the weaponization of money for the destruction of Canada, we also have PROOF that the Trudeau government itself knows global Warming is a lie, since each person from the middle East and Africa multiplies his or her carbon footprint by a factor of FOUR. That’s right. If you move from a 3rd world, tropical or desert country to Canada, the carbon required to keep you warm and moving to the things you need to do, is 4 X greater than it was a point of origin, and the state knows this for a hot fact.

The same thing obviously has happened with Health Canada. This is a fun exercise you can follow along with at home!

In summary:

– Taxation is likely an illusion to one degree or another. The government prints to do what it wants to do, and taxation is for the illusion of rationality, and likely to punish the middle class, given the Marxist-Leninist-Hegelian nature of our rulers in nearly all of the West today. For those who haven’t read it, you may want to carefully read this NP article on the next prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney.

-Global Warming is another dialectical bomb to destroy Canada in whatever way they need at the moment. Often by selectively enforcing elements of it as needs be.

-Canada’s various departments have all been transformed into a Hegelian-Marxist weapon against Socratic reality. What vestigial aspects of these departments remain, is largely to create the illusion to the blue pill people that their reality is safe. That the rest of us are Chicken Littles, and no amount of clouds or meteors hitting them in the head will allow them to suspect maybe that tiny poultry was in fact correct. As a prediction, the pretence is likely about to be removed. Slowly the institutions of state will allow themselves to be known more closely as to what they really are, as they determine that their old names and purposes were racist and anathema to the revolution.

Lawyer Peter Krusse explains the tyranny being imposed on the world by the UN WHO

Posted on by

14 minutes.

Toronto anti-Israel protest: Who was arrested and who not and more importantly what effect that has on Civilization and rule of law

Posted on by

At one of the constant anti-Israel, anti-civilization protests in Toronto by Communists and Muslims, (COMSLIMS? MUSUNISTS?) the only person to be arrested was an Iranian expat carrying a Canadian flag and a sign saying “Hamas is a terrorist organization”. Lets see who was, and was not arrested at the same demonstration to understand the true state of the revolution in Canada, and for that matter, the Anglosphere and probably all of the West today.

So to be clear: This ex-pat Iranian, who knows exactly the game, was arrested for a sign which is a statement of fact, and wearing a Canadian flag.

Beth Baisch interviews him below

He was in fact, a political prisoner in Iran

The following photo is of a person said to be at the same demonstration, but who was not arrested.

It is our contention that police for the last decade at least across the West no longer enforce the law, which means there is no rule-of-law per se. But there is no anarchy or increased freedom either. What police do now, is manage the collapse of civilization in a controlled manner. A controlled demolition of the towers of civilization if you like, in order to make sure the transition to the authoritarian collectivist system now in place will not be too violent or face too much resistance.

The dialectical use of force by state agencies like the police has a clear outcome. Extrapolating from existing data makes it very easy to determine. Those who message in favour of Western values and religion will be persecuted at first, and eventually prosecuted. Christians caught praying in a way that is blasphemous of the new religion of the state will be arrested for thought crimes, and if not punished legally, punished extra legally. Thought crimes such as silent praying near an abortuarium in the UK. A police actually asker he what she was doing standing silently, and then asked her what she was praying about. The first overt arrest for a thought crime perhaps in the Western world. At least since feudal kings.

“…but also names prayer and counselling as forms of protesting.”

This is all clearly the retooling of language to serve the revolution. Rule of law, in terms of the protection of individual rights, is dead. All outcomes must be the state’s desired outcomes, and those are fungible at any time and without notice. This means that entire segments of society suddenly become criminals. Also, laws increasingly are becoming retroactive, both de jure and de facto. A politically incorrect statement made decades ago by someone currently a threat to the revolution will be punished, even if it was fully within the culture of the day. But also, actual laws are starting to include the notion of being retroactive. We have seen this in Quebec and federally in Canada concerning criticism of Islam. An example of De facto punishment would be the ginning up of hatred of Donald Trump for an off hand remark he made in a locker room a decade before he went into politics. He didn’t drown a woman in his car or anything. He just mentioned that rich famous men were able to have extraordinary reproductive access to women. A fact no one denies. He said it in a humorous way, but he was not wrong. For this he was soundly punished.

The police argument for their actions, at least in terms of protests, will be that they make these arrests to protect the person they are arresting from an obviously hostile mob. However true this may be, it does not take away from the absolute fact that it means the police, in Canada especially where police have the sole monopoly on use of force, have taken on the role of guaranteeing supremacy of mob rule. The group most likely to behave violently will set the laws for that time and space and police will make sure no one does anything the mob finds objectionable. The result, intentionally or not, is the large hostile group owns the territory with police in on the assist.

This is not rule of law.

 

 

Tucker Carlson with Cardinal Muller on the fall of the West

Posted on by

Two TIK History videos dealing with the system of thought of Hitler’s gnosticism

Posted on by

One thing should have become apparent to all who study Islam and communism as a threat doctrine. And that is when dealing with an alien system of thought, any attempt to fight it is doomed to fail or at least the cost of winning becomes unimaginably high if you do not understand how the enemy thinks, and therefore why they do what they do, and even in fact, what it is they intend to do. Once you can understand these things, you can predict their actions. If you can predict their actions you have at least the potential to defeat them.

For example, Islam differs from Christianity in several fundamental ways. One of them is in the eschatology. Christianity believes that “Jesus will come as a thief in the night” . One critical aspect of this is that nothing humans do can make these events unfold. Christian end times events are set by God and not by man.

Islam on the other hand, believes that it is up to the followers of Mohamed to create the conditions to bring on the end times. Worse, that the martyrs who died fighting for global Islamic manifest destiny are stuck waiting in their graves for the final battle in a city in Syria until the believers can force this mighty battle to decide all things. This city was Dabiq and was also the name of the Islamic State monthly magazine when they had it. And this is why all roads from the Islamic eschatology point of view, leads to Dabiq.

Understanding even this one tiny example of the fundamental difference in system of thought allows for a large degree of greater understanding in terms of Islam and what it seeks and why.

Another more contemporary example, and one that will set keyboards afire as they object to it, is how Israel had allowed itself to think that Hamas was in fact thinking like Israel does, and was trying to accumulate wealth and build a civilization for their own people and had given up the idea of the destruction of Israel. This I am told, by significant sources, was the reason for Israel’s lack of readiness on Oct. 7 2023. They were not able to understand Islam’s actual core motivations, and therefore Iran’s, The Muslim Brotherhood and its various branch offices like Hamas. Islam, like Nazism has a core belief that motivates their actions. Material comfort and security is not among the attributes. But they do understand how we think very well and use that to their advantage in all propaganda and attacks.

The basic human tendency when looking at huge things is to try and reduce it to the simplest formulae within our own frames of reference. This is because learning another frame of reference is difficult and very few can be bothered to do so, especially when the threat appears to be over. At this point we might all agree that these threats are likely never really over so much as dormant. The “Cold War” with communism being the best current example. And understanding the system of thought of threat doctrines is key to preventing its total victory over us. And it it never really too late to do that even though the later the hour the higher the cost of reconquest.

The current examples of course, are leftism and Islam. Both of which have boat loads more in common with each other than with Western thinkers. And while this may seem counter-intuitive based on leftist and Islamic propaganda, but any self-honest observer can see the truth of it.

In the following two videos, TIK History makes the case that Nazism was also a religion, and an old one at that. A Gnostic cult and provides evidence from Hitler’s own speeches and book. And a case can be made, and it has, that we are fighting the Nazis now. More accurately, the Nazis are fighting us now as we aren’t really fighting back yet. But the COMINTERN, UN, EU and WEF have more in common with Nazis than anyone else except maybe Maoists. And one might argue that would also be a distinction without a difference.

UPDATE: New video from TIK History. Correcting the myth that Hitler was funded by capitalists

 

Stephen Coughlin: The Deep Attack – Marxism’s war on women

Posted on by

I cannot stress enough how good, and how important this is.

In Stephen’s presentation, he uses the illustration of a wild pig trap as an analogy to how we are lured into the blast zone of a dialectical bomb. Its a worthy and effective analogy.

The one below we feel is as good but perhaps for a slightly different aspect of how the COMINTERN states wage information war on us all. The “Two weeks to flatten the curve” is the easiest example, but there are many.

Major Jordan’s diaries on communist subversion of the US back to WW2

Posted on by

This is an astonishing document. As far as I know, only two people were jailed and for a very, very long time for assisting the Soviets to get the nuclear bomb. Yet listening to Major Jordan, it should have been a goodly part of Washington DC. Having read part of the Whittaker Chambers book, Witness, this video makes an excellent companion to his document about the nature of communism in that era, and how penetrated the US, and clearly Canada was at the time.

Psychiatrist, Dr Keith Ablow explains to Tucker Carlson why the DEA stole his laptop and guns and never returned them, or charged him with anything, ever

Posted on by