In this interview, Neil discusses the WHO treaty for global control, and “those who saw it coming”.
In this interview, we talk to one of the organizers of the events planned for June 30th in Ottawa, the arrival of James Topp.
Taken at face value, it would almost seem that when playing by the city, or indeed any level of government’s rules, they are not attempting to work with us for the best outcome, but in fact seek the information they need to make sure your event is a failure.
It seemed that way with Rolling Thunder when at the last minute, the Veterans were not allowed to ride around the War Memorial, and it seems that way on the attempt to have a family picnic a couple of miles from Parliament Hill and the Downtown core. When the permit was issued, it had impossible conditions. Then the city said the park would not be available for family picnics, even though that is what it’s for, and that indeed NO CITY FACILITY would be available for the veterans or supporters of James Topp.
Quite a contrast to what they let you do if you claim to be a member of a sexual activities group that cannot possibly produce offspring.
Perhaps it isn’t as it seems. Maybe this is just bureaucracy at work and, like is so often stated, “don’t mistake incompetence with malice”. I gotta say though. After watching 15 years of various lines of effort against Western thought and civilization it is exactly the opposite. Do not mistake malice for incompetence. Because they cannot get it exactly that wrong, that often, with such predictable results unless that was the desired outcome.
As the US and Canada are both gearing up to become totalitarian states where paid state thugs can just take your property, and to quote Aaron, “There is a difference between voting on police protecting your rights and voting to have them take your rights away”, I thought it was worth the week long (an hour or two a day) looking through old hard drives to find this particular video.
If you like it as much as I, please spread it around.
Please watch the entire thing. Andrew cuts to the chase at the end. Being permanently suspended from Twitter is certainly a serious thing when all you did was post a peer reviewed paper on the vaxx and male fertility.
Put another way, you are put in information solitary confinement for speaking what is scientific truth in the National Town Square.
By the end of the video, Dr. Bostom starts to talk about the state of science in the US. I would extrapolate that to the entire West. He specificlly cites Lysenko. The Soviet conclusion based reasoning method that destroyed so many lives in so many ways from 1917 to today in communist states.
3Speak appears to be down. Below is the same clip from Bitchute
There is a lot to be infuriated about in this video.
But the main two things for this site are:
The news reader talks about “CIS Gender” as if she buys into the notion that sex is merely an arbitrary designation by a doctor at birth by looking at genitals. Its so obscenely an attack on our taxonomy that you could make the same claim about species and even phylum. A person is born and declared a human being when really they could be a half a pound of squash.
The second thing is how the law only works to move the culture to the left. This person is breaking laws on hiring discrimination wherever he is for absolute certain. But there will be no penalties. If you asked him if he thought it was OK for a similar business to not hire black or gay people, we all know what he would say. The law only operates to enhance the dialectic. To move the culture ever leftwards.
Please read an article on other aspects of this interview at:
Please read the story details at:
Remember the climate huxter, David Suzuki? In the 80s he used to shill for communists by claiming Western industry was going to destroy the Earth by putting out soot (Carbon) that would block out the sun and cause an ice age. He called this, ‘Nuclear Winter’. Then, once CBC buried all the video of him saying this bilge, he reappeared with the exact opposite narrative and started saying carbon from Western industry would cause ‘global warming’.
Here is he blackmailing children to send him money to save the polar bears.
The worst kind of ugly climate propaganda: David Suzuki targets kids at Christmas in the name of climate change
Here’s the popup
messagesolicitation you get when you visit the website for the first time:
Climate change is melting the North Pole and it’s no longer safe for Santa and his Workshop. So our dear old friend is packing up the sleigh to find somewhere else to live.
You can help! Move your mouse over this website to find gifts you can buy Santa to help him set up a temporary Workshop and protect the North Pole for his return.
Of course, you’re savvy enough to know we won’t be sending actual gifts to Santa. You will receive a tax receipt for 100% of your purchase and proceeds will be used by the David Suzuki Foundation to support our critical work to protect nature and the environment from threats like climate change.
Buying these green gifts and personalized ecards on behalf of hard-to-buy-for friends or relatives on your holiday list is a great way to show you’re thinking of them — and the planet!
The current vaccine, digital currencies, Covid, and lots of other attacks on the west via language, are not the first lines of effort against classical thought. Crypto-environmentalism was most definitely one of them. A line of effort is a point of focus for a disinformation campaign intended to damage a target in specific ways.
Let’s take a purely hypothetical and absurd example as I find fiction often helps to illustrate a point.
One of the main targets of disinformation would be the enemy military. So imagine if you can, that say, the US military picked a man to be a four star general who openly stated he was really a woman, and they picked him, not because he was the best candidate with a peculiarity but specifically because he is a man who insists he is a woman, and has some of the outward trappings of a female, but clearly is not one.
Just to add to the impossibility of this farcical situation, imagine the military was paying for cosmetic surgery for any person to sort of kind of look like the other sex, making them sterile for sure, but also making them less effective as soldiers, and certainly taking them out of potential combat for some long period of time.
Then imagine that the military would put time money and effort into making flight suits specially for pregnant women, where the high G forces of fighter jets would most certainly damage or destroy a gestating baby no matter what the costume worn. G forces are G forces. And the human limit is about 9 Gs for a fit healthy person with no hangover. Imagine what just 2 or 3 X the normal pull of gravity would do to a developing embryo. The most expensive abortion of all time.
(It is possible that the military developed a flight suit, which is basically just customized overalls for pilots and not a G suit for pregnant women. This should have cost about USD $19.95 at wall mart though. A normal flight suit with some spandex around the middle would work fine.)
All of this seems absurd of course. As absurd as if the US government picked a supreme court judge who said as she wasn’t a biologist, she didn’t know the difference between men and women.
Clearly none of these things could possibly happen. But if they did, it would mean the end game of a massively successful disinformation campaign intended to damage all aspects of the machinery of state. And these hypotheticals would represent just one other line of effort. The attack on basic taxonomy. It has become effectively a criminal offence, even if punished outside of the legal space, to advocate or claim there is truth in classical thinking on the biology of sex. On chemistry of climate. On asking for proof of the safety of medicines. Of asking for availability of medicine which is safe and actually works.
It would almost be like as if a Climate activist were to go to the Louvre, disguised as an old woman, and rip of the wig and attack the painting of the Mona Lisa with a cake. What has the Mona Lisa to do with climate? Global warming activism is about one thing. A line of effort against classical thought, culture and values and especially industry. The Mona Lisa is a major symbol of classical artistic achievement. So if such an absurd thing where to happen, well that might explain it.
And then there is defence of Western culture from one of the most pernicious disinformation attacks of all, the oxymoronic concept of “multiculturalism”. Culture is a set of values which each society codifies into law. Having more than one set of these laws operating within on jurisdiction is not sustainable. Either you have animal cruelty laws or you do not. You cannot allow muslims to slaughter goats or sheep in the garage because they feel its a religious/cultural obligation on them. Either men and women are equal before the law, or they are not. The multicultural aspect of the disinformation lines of effort could go on for volumes. But the point is made.
Around May of 1983, approximately 4 months before being shot down in KAL007, Congressman Larry McDonald takes on Pat Buchanan and Tom Braden on Crossfire as they badger him about his new role as Chairman of the John Birch Society. He easily handles them and answers questions concerning the Elite’s Conspiracy for a One World Government.
It is interesting to watch the host castigate the John Birch Society for statements it made on or before 1983 which have turned out to be 100% true. Here is the zip file of the pdf of the actual Rockefeller document showing exactly what he said is factually correct. It is from 2010. Decades after they described it.
“The State who?”
“The State who says your home is under occupied.”
And this was all in my own head. Yes, they came and knocked on the door of my mind. It was a man and a women, neatly dressed, with official-looking laminated name tags on their chests. I looked behind and saw a large room. Cluttered with photographs, it’s odd what one remembers. Old girlfriends, flashes of moments–I read somewhere that these flashes are the sum total of our lives.
Cluttered, dusty and fairly chaotic, the woman muttered something beneath her breath about my house being a reflection of my mental state.
“My mental state is perfectly fine,” I said, catching her off guard. She didn’t know I had heard her.
“Of course you would say that,” she blurted. “It’s your mind so you don’t know any better. We’re from the Department of Mental Housing. We have a report from an anonymous complaint that says your mind is under occupied.”
“What does this mean? That I’m stupid or vapid? Because that’s what it sounds like.”
“No, Sir,” the man said. “It means you will have to take on tenants. You are the only occupant here, if our records are correct. Under regulation four-fifty-one, paragraph seven, line “D”, all minds must maintain a minimum of two-point five occupants per head.”
“When did this rule take effect?”
“September 21st, 2030,” the man replied.
“Well, that’s ridiculous. I suggest you both leave immediately.” I began to close the door.
“Not possible,” he replied.
“Oh? Who says? There’s no room here for any more.”
“You have plenty of room, Sir,” said the woman. “In fact you’re lucky we don’t fine you as a mental Kulak. How have you managed to hide so much mental space for so long?”
“I keep my door locked and curtains drawn. Now get lost.”
“No Sir.” The man placed his foot in my door as I began to close it.
“How many in your head?” I asked the woman.
“I have an Eritrean family of seven.”
“And I have three Ukrainians,” said the man proudly, straightening his posture as he said it. I could almost see the blue and yellow flag waving in his eyes. Ten-years on and that war was still going. “We are serving the greater good, and so must you.”
Suddenly there was a noise behind me in the room. I turned, and, much to my surprise two old men came through a door from the far side. “Who is this?” said the one old man with a long grey beard.
“It’s people from Mental Housing,” I said.
“Get rid of them. You’re up to code.” The old man came to the door. “This is my son and that’s his uncle. That makes three, now please leave.”
“Is this true?” the man asked.
“Of course. Your records are mistaken,” I answered.
“Very well, then. But we will be back to check on you.”
I closed the door. Lucky for me I had been listening to “uncle” Orwell’s 1984, and “papa” Solzenitzen’s gulag stories on audio books. I had been thinking about them alot..
Thank you Johnny U.
Scott Ventureyra is an Ottawa author with a doctorate in theology, and recently published a book on Covid measures and how it is the reaction to covid that is a threat to humanity, more than the actual pathogen.
For the story details and more analysis on this interview, please visit RAIR Foundation at this link
NEW – EU Commission is expected to publish the draft law on "chat control" tomorrow. Lawmakers seek AI-based checks of all message content & images directly on users' devices.
Critics say this is an attack on the digital privacy of correspondence and leads to mass surveillance.
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) May 10, 2022