Category Archives: The Narrative

Rebel Report on CBC active measures Aktivnye meropriyatiya

Posted on by

The following editorial on the video below was written by Johnny U and posted unedited:

Here is a piece by Rebel News that does not quite grasp its own profundity. It reveals Rebel and the people it is trying to help are missing a few vital keys to fully grasping what is going on: namely an active measure.

One definition:

The term, which dates back to the 1920s, includes operations such as espionage, propaganda, sabotage, assassination, and the collection of kompromat for blackmail purposes based on the foreign policy objectives of the Soviet and Russian governments.

Usually we only see the end results of an active measure. This means we see the headline shaming the political target, but not the setup that created the shame. Another example was the placement of Nazi flags by state actors among the Truckers Freedom Convoy, which was intended to disgrace that whole movement in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This Rebel report gives us a rare glimpse into the actual machinery of an active measure. The language of dialectics, of which active measures is a vital component, is difficult and abstract and hard to learn. It becomes, however, an increasingly blunt instrument the more one learns it. Metaphorically, describing in detail a loaded hand gun to a blind person is an abstraction until the gun is fired and the bullet hits them, whereupon the “Aha!” moment instantly erases all abstraction, along with the implied cleverness of the words used to describe the gun.

The full comment can be read here. 

Canada spraying toxins over our forests and near our cities with an eerie echo of Vaxx narrative enforcement against detractors

Posted on by

There was last Sunday, a gathering of the freedom minded in Pembroke Ontario as happens now annually in August called, “Rally in the Valley.

Amongst the speakers was Josh Alexander’s dad, Matt Alexander who gave an amazing talk about how communist the school board is. Communist both in his words and mine. He was fired from a long term teaching job for refusing to celebrate and affirm sexual identities to THREE YEAR OLDS.

Also Dr. David Speicher, virologist and microbiologist who’s discoveries about the mRNA shots are now peer reveiwed and should have a real impact on court cases if there is even a vestigial hint of real justice or law left in Canada.

Many other speakers were there as well and all will be published as time permits.

But among them were three activist women who spoke on the matter of spraying Glysophate on Canadian forests, and are actively attempting to stop it.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent summary of the talks here with related videos. Including two with Stephanie Seneff, probably the world’s leading expert in glyphosate that isn’t actually selling or making the stuff.

This link is to a NYT Article from August of 2024. It is behind a paywall but maybe we can get away with a couple of short exerpts that will make the point that the exact tactics and thought process behind banning counter-narrative science and speech that took place during Covid has been taking place over glyphosate, and still is.

[…] Doctors at the Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Center in Moncton, the largest city in the province of New Brunswick, Canada, zeroed in on an exceedingly rare condition — Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, caused by prions, misfolding proteins in the brain — as the most likely culprit. 

[…] Laurie’s Creutzfeldt-Jakob test had come back negative.

[…] Laurie Beatty was just one of many local residents who had gone to Marrero’s office exhibiting similar, inexplicable symptoms of neurological decline — more than 20 in the previous four years.

[…] According to P.H.A.C. scientists, both the number of undiagnosable patients and, more important, their ages were “unprecedented at the national and provincial levels.” They called it the “New Brunswick neurological syndrome of unknown etiology.” 

[…] The Canadian Institutes of Health Research offered the province $5 million to help fund a two-year clinical investigation.

But then something changed. A month later, on the afternoon of May 6, 2021, an email from the provincial health department began to circulate saying that all currently scheduled meetings would be “paused” until provincial researchers “had the time to delve more deeply into existing data.” Meetings that had been planned months in advance were wiped from the calendar. Field experts and neurologists were left waiting on Zoom links that never came. “There was a stop, suddenly, abruptly, with no apparent explanation,” says Marrero, who called the decision “unusual by any standards.”

Things grew even murkier 10 days later, when Marrero says he got a call on his cellphone from Dr. Hanan Smadi, the province’s acting lead epidemiologist, telling him to stop reporting potential new cases to the provincial authorities. Marrero was appalled. The number of patients in the cluster — at the time 48, eight dead — was continuing to rise. According to Marrero, when he asked where the request was coming from, Smadi told him, “It comes from higher up.”

Do not report new cases. Pretty much exactly like the instructions on vaxx damage. Not just to the mRNA, but in general, doctors are extremely discouraged from reporting any ill effects of any vaccines for a very long time now. At least in Canada.

Below, the speakers from the Pembroke rally, August 24th 2025

Below, an interview with Stephanie Seneff and Dr. Mercola on the dangers of glyphosate to the health of the environment and human beings.

More of the talks from the Pembroke Rally in the valley to come soon.

 

Exceptional speech in the Dutch Parliament about the destruction of Europe via Coudenhove-Kalergi

Posted on by

This is interesting on a couple of levels. The actual content, which is a must see for sure, even if everyone knows the material. It is well packaged and I guess we can take some form of comfort seeing it expressed in official circles like this. But also because it does not take long till opposition manages to deflect the points he is making into a discussion about freedom of speech. This should not even be a discussion. We should all have it, and no less, Parliamentarians who are exposing the key strategic plan to destroy Europe forever.

But as you watch, even the speaker gets waylaid into losing his own point and engages in this distraction. Which speaks to Maj. Coughlin’s point perhaps, that you can know everything these is to know about Marxism and nothing about dialectics and we lose, but know everything about dialectics and nothing about Marxism and we win. Once you see these dialectical tactics deployed, it changes everything. They won’t work on you.

The good news is, he gets back on the horse and makes his points.

The most disappointing this is his claim that Geert Wilders’ party, the PVV, has entirely caved to globalism, and has only asked for the most trivial of changes to the mass immigration and EU demands.

A summary of his points is available at RAIR

A short and partial list of common (marxist) terms and a translation to reality

Posted on by

This is a post i have wanted to make for a long time. A Marxist to English dictionary, even if its only half a page. The point of it is to understand how to do it much more than just exposing the specific terms we chose as exemplars. Understanding the principles and methods of Marxist dialectical terminology is critical if you want to have any chance of seeing outside the Matrix.

Communism is not much more if anything at all, than a system for attacking and destroying Western civilization at every level at which Western Civilization operates and exists. More than we are even aware of. Every aspect of our nature from our forms of reasoning and cultures as well as all institutions and professions which support our systems. From medicine to engineers, pilots to teachers etc.

Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is an excellent manual on how to use orthodox Marxist methods adapted to the early 20th century. And a lot of those methods can be said to be a subset of Critical Theory.

At one level, critical theory is really simple. It is just criticizing everything about the West. Dishonestly, partially honestly, meaning spinning a real thing into something totally other than it really was to make the West, and especially the US look bad, or even honest criticism in an emergency, so to speak. Meaning when a narrative attack isn’t available. But in nearly all cases, Critical Theory is about a fictionalized version of the target and then a critical theory attack on that fiction.

It is because of this that we noticed that the media would sustain a rabid feeding frenzy over any non-white person killed by police either due to no fault of the police, like with George Floyd, or where the person who was shot richly deserved it as they were in the process of committing a violent crime. Even more importantly, that when a person who could be labelled as a black person was killed by police for reasons that were likely genuinely racist, there was little to no media and certainly no major protests or riots.

And this is 100% sensible when one understands that the idea is not to make the system better, but to destroy it altogether. 

When people protest a real problem there is a solution that makes things even better than they were before. But when the problem is synthetic, the solution the rioters want, defund the police etc. is the only option on the table.

Therefore, when we look at the way we are forced to look at race relations now in the West, and particularity the USA, we can see and understand it as a product of :

Critical Race Theory. A critical theory attack on the West by attacking people of European ethnicity, or “white people” as guilty of any number of things for which they have no connection and in many ways no-one ever was guilty as the history is usually partly or fully fictionalized. Certainly the context will be adjusted for the best effect of the Critical Theory attack.

The communists now in control of the schools are becoming more bold now and use the term, Critical Race Theory more openly. But that is what it is. A branch of Hegelian dialectics as interpreted by Marx and refined by the Frankfurt School tactician, Alinsky. This process of abstracting and expanding Marxist methods of attack on the West continue to this day. And the people fighting for the West for the most part do not understand the nature of the attack, and spend all their resources arguing the reality behind the critical theory attack, if they even get that far. In other words, arguing the surface specifics of a given narrative’s claims, while the critical theory attack does its damage.

As we often say, with the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point.

[I think I first heard that from Diana West but she may have been quoting someone else]

Let’s have a look at a few more terms:

Multiculturalism ~ Critical culture theory.

Like BLM is a marxist expression of critical theory by creating a dialectic confrontation between black and white people with the intention of destroying both ultimately, but ‘white’ people first, Multiculturalism is exactly the same. Bring in people from different cultures. Pretend to the host country that bringing in different cultures really just means interesting new recipes and sophisticated new arts and entertainment. But the reality of Multiculturalism means giving special protection to people from outside the host country to ‘protect their cultures’ while removing basic, even fundamental rights to the citizens of the host country, such that no opposition to what is taking place can happen without the objector being either directly guilty of a crime such as ‘hate speech’, or adjacent to a crime such as ‘racism’ where ‘racism’ while not always and not in all districts is specifically a crime, it can be dealt with by removing additional rights such as social media use, access to banking or even the right to use of a credit card or even accepting credit cards. So while not a crime, it is indeed punishable.

This happened to Robert Spencer for factual and unimpeachable explanations and descriptions of Islam that make Western peoples aware of it as a threat doctrine. Which it is. In case you haven’t noticed. But in all cases, the term, “multiculturalism’ is one deceptive click away from Critical race theory. The use of fictionalized race history and relations, or truthful ones but spun or cherry picked for a political outcome, rather than information. And the outcome is destruction.

Critical Culture Theory is tearing the west apart and down everywhere. And it has moved to pure oppression in the UK.

Climate Change ~ Critical Climate Theory

This one required an extra twist. It required moving from science as a method of understanding the universe, to scientism, where Marxist politicians tell you how the universe works. It is a gnostic cult of the White Coat. Science is never done by consensus. Politics and religion are, and in the case of communism, even that consensus is imposed from above. With Global Warming/Climate Change, we saw experts we never heard of, explain a consensus in the ‘science’ which has ‘already been done’ to explain why the measures being taken to ‘combat climate change’ cannot be questioned. You know, cause so many scientists agree. Real scientists, ones who explain their methods and publish their research get cancelled. Anyone who wants to see an excellent example of this should watch The Cloud Mystery. This is a short documentary by two Danish scientists who actually have a hypothesis on climate and temperature, and then prove it with data going back to Galileo’s first use of the telescope to study the Sun. Then watch the linked video of an explanation on how a Frankfurt School 2nd generation member, Jurgen Habermas, created the framework around which a small minority can impose their will on the majority using ‘consensus’ for political purposes.

Below, a truly amazing example of how Canada’s CBC COMINTERN broadcaster does exactly this. They make any refutation of Critical Climate Theory into hate speech as per Habermas. Have a listen after watching the linked video on Habermas.

But what makes it critical climate theory is its use to destroy Western industry. Communists picked the one marker that all industry in the world produces, CO2, and claimed it is a pollutant and claimed it as an existential threat to the World. Unless it is produced in China, North Korea, or anywhere else already socialist/communist. Then it is not to be mentioned. Like all Critical theory, it is meant to be destructive to Western Civ. And this one is majorly destructive. After all, if it was a real threat the people agitating over it would meet on Zoom and not fly private jets all over the world, and purchasing multi million dollar beach front homes for themselves where they themselves had saiid would be deep under water already from “global Warming”. And we would be building nuclear power plants as fast as we could. Even people who have real or exaggerated concerns about the safety of modern nuclear energy plants, will admit that the risk is not an existential risk to all life on Earth as they claim climate change to be. So in other words, it is a fake problem with real solutions that are avoided, in order to get the solutions they want, which is our destruction.

SOGI (Sexual orientation and Gender Identification) also Gender affirming Care ~ Critical Sex theory.

Destroying how people think of each other in terms of sexuality is a major victory for communists. After all, without reproduction, we go extinct. And yes, that is a victory for communism by some interpretations of communist theory. There are leftist groups across the West now that actively and openly seek human extinction. But as a rule, just for white people. Or more accurately, anyone who supports Western Civilization of any race or colour, as they will be labelled as white people and treated as such or worse by the left. Larry Elder as one clear example.

To the point though, destroying people’s ability to reproduce using drugs and surgical mutilation is a bonus. The main purpose is to destroy how Western people view each other sexually. This one deserves more than its own essay. It deserves a book.

Some point form proofs though, are that China made an official announcement, and passed a law, that no effeminate men can be seen  on TV. In other words, Critical Race Theory is a destructive dialectical weapon against the West and China needs to protect itself from it in case it comes back home. Like Covid.

Below is a truly excellent video on the communist origins of Critical Sex Theory:

DEI ~ Critical institutional theory, or Critical Merit Theory

The whole purpose of DEI is to destroy all the institutions we have. Stephen Coughlin feels it is primarily to destroy our military capability. And it can and it will. But it has already destroyed many other professions. The Merit principle is one of the absolute supporting pillars of Western Civ. The idea that the person best suited for a job and best at it, gets the job, not only enables things to be done well, but advances all of our sciences and arts throughout the history of Western Civ. One can spot quickly the number of positions in leftist governments that use DEI hires, or what we used to call, “Affirmative Action”. An older term used as a disguise for Critical Merit theory. This is not to say that people other than white males are incapable. In fact it has nothing to do with white males. DEI is about making sure the people picked for important and responsible positions are incapable. They would definitely pick a white male for a job requiring training and coordination if the person they picked had advanced Parkinson’s and Alzheimers. In fact they picked one for President of the United States.

The Merit principle also is the best example of actual fairness in human history. Everyone understands when someone who has worked harder, is more dedicated, more talented or simply better at a job gets the job. It was the replacement of nepotism. In fact some historians argue that Lincoln was actually shot by a man who felt that he deserved a well paid and prestigious civil service job by nepotism and was passed over for someone of greater merit. Out of resentment, he shot Lincoln. DEI manufactured the idea that all who are good or accomplished are oppressors, and therefore not deserving. That achievement is cheating. Taking responsibility is privilege and so on. Over the course of the revolution in the West during the past 10 years or so, we see countless examples of Critical merit theory. From Math is Racist to reading to your children is racist.

Harm Reduction:

This is the idea that creating an environment where illegal powerful narcotics can be used with zero legal repercussions and even facilitate its use, resulting in exponentially more addicts, fatalities and resultant crime from the use of these substances, somehow reduces the harm to the users and society as a whole. It is named dialectically as are the others in this list. A case could be made that providing the actual narcotics free could actually reduce harm, as it ends organized crime interest in the purchase and sale, and also guarantees the user a known purity, usually meaning no overdoses. But what the “harm Reduction” policies do is the exact opposite. Harm reduction keeps organized crime at the centre, while eliminating the cost from a legal point of view to the addict. It even removes the shame of it. The results are obvious. EVERYWHERE “Harm Reduction: has been implemented, the number of users has skyrocketed and the real and measurable harm in deaths, serious disease from drug use and prostitution and crime have all risen to the point of destroying entire urban areas.

“Diversity is our Strength” is the dialectic attack on United We Stand, divided we fall. because the intention is to make us fall by division. 

This is only a partial list. Comments are welcome with other phrases used as disguised attacks on us all.

Three incidents of antisemitism which show that communism is implemented by the culture as much as by the state

Posted on by

The first one is a minor but meaningful incident in Australia. While it was resolved by the company and very well, it does not mean that it never happened, or that there is no meaning in it.

Here is a link to a story about how a girl working at a print shop in Australia refused to laminate something for a guy because it had Israeli or Jewish content.

Without doing too deep a dive into this, its likely this worker abused a company rule that allowed them to avoid pornographic material that would be offensive to them in order to justify refusing to laminate this gentlemen’s page. The company did exactly what it should have done, and more. But the question is, how did we get here. How did we get to a place where people can’t show a Jewish heritage or support of Israel, wear a trump hat, or show support for any counter-narrative position without people on the street or with whom they are working with, then feeling justified in whatever measure they may chose to take against you?

Communism it seems, has been implemented via the culture. A Jewish person may not feel comfortable ordering take out when the restaurant staff or delivery person has their name. What might they do rather than just refuse service? Or anyone famously conservative for that matter. We no longer have a trust based society. In fact, we clearly are moving from a de jure society to a de facto one in the sense that it doesn’t matter what the law says when calculating the consequences of expressing a view.  Or even belonging to a group to which others would impute your views onto you and then punish you for them.

The second: A mohel, or a Rabbi specifically trained in how to do circumcisions as Jewish ritual was arrested and jailed and denied bail in Ireland. Keep in mind, Muslims also do circumcision as religious ritual. Not aware of any arrests of their practitioners. And if one imagines that in Ireland they are not doing this also to women with relatively untrained people, they are living in a myopic dream state. This site is full of examples of this having been discovered, right up to where the media stopped reporting on it.

Man in court charged with circumcising child in Dublin

A 47-year-old man has appeared in court charged with circumcising a child at a house in Dublin two days ago without being a registered medical practitioner.

Jonathan Abraham, with an address in London, was remanded in custody.

The judge refused bail on the grounds of the seriousness of the charge, the potential flight risk and the nature of the offence.

Mr Abraham was brought by detectives from Blanchardstown before Dublin District Court.

He is accused of performing a surgical procedure – the circumcision of a male child – without being a medical practitioner.

The offence is contrary to section 37 of the Medical Practitioners Act 2007.

Detective Garda Megan Furey said that she arrested Mr Abraham at 10.15pm last night at Blanchardstown Garda Station and when the charge was put to him, he made no reply.

The court was told that gardaí went into a house in west Dublin on 30 July after 1pm with the consent of homeowners and Mr Abraham was there dressed in a white doctor’s style coat, wearing blue gloves, with medical implements nearby.

Det Gda Furey said that a very young child was naked on a changing pad and a circumcision had been carried out on another child.

She objected to bail. She said he had flown into Ireland at 12pm and had a return flight for 7pm.

Defence solicitor Tertius Van Eeden said that Mr Abraham was a rabbi and a member of the oldest Anglo-Jewish society that governs the practice and procedure for circumcision.

He said he was a mohel, a person trained and allowed to carry out the practice in line with the Jewish faith.

Read the rest at the link above. And whatever your views of this practice are, the issue is the selective enforcement against the Jewish community it in a way that has broader political implications. This kind of enforcement has a word, dia dia something.

Meanwhile in Canada: The hate crime arrests in numbers by a Toronto Police chief.

The concept of hate speech and hate crimes is anathema to a republic. Crime is crime. Motives is up to the trial to determine and punishment is up to the judge to determine based on those motives and the damage done. The notion of thought crimes gives ultimate power to the state and the state will use it in the interests of the state and at the expense of the people. It will be enforced dialectically. We already see that with gangs of communists, college LARPers and Muslims calling for Jewish blood on most Western city streets with a university, and no charges or even statistics recorded. But should anyone say anything that counters the revolutionary narratives, well watch the UK. Here is a link to PJ Watson with a few examples of how the same politicians spoke about violent minority riots in 2020 and the ones this weekend. If they can enforce on reality this diabolically, then what can they do with thought and speech crimes. Hell telling us all what we meant by what we say started as early as the 1960s when words started to be banned for some groups because of what they told us we meant as if we didn’t know why we used those words.

That started a trend in which the entire language became the patented property of the left. You then had to mean what they said, and you better not say it.

As the revolution is not quite complete, or because the above video serves it in some way that isn’t immediately obvious, we see that hate-crimes are still phenomenally more against the Jewish community than against any other group, on top of it being generally protected by the state. Ezra Levant did a great job of demonstrating that with the arson of a Jewish school and several school busses used to bring Jewish kids to school in Toronto. in the past month. The media and police denied the nature of those crimes and the police went so far to specifically deny arson of the Jewish school claiming it was just a homeless guy with a hobo-fire went awry. The Media managed to avoid any mention of the school busses being next to a Jewish school and having Hebrew signs all over them. They only mentioned, the two media that did mention it at all, CTV and City News, that the busses were parked next to a discount grocer.

Since we now know for a fact that this is how it was reported and recorded, at least initially till Rebel found the facts, we can then safely ask, how many attacks on Jewish people, Christians, white people by communists and Muslims are not reported? Once you know the state and the media lies to you, you actually know a great deal. But coming to accept that is difficult.

Hate speech exposed as dialectics in South Africa

Posted on by

Basically just watch this video. Saying or singing “Kill The White Farmer, Kill the White man” is not hate speech according to a South African court of law. But using the word, “Kaffir” is. I don’t think in South Africa it has the exact meaning it does everywhere else. Normally, Kaffir is an Islamic insult of calling all non-believers, subhuman with no right to life because they don’t believe in Islam. Technically, that is a death penalty offence in places with a strict Islamic government. But in South Africa, Kaffir is a derogatory word for black people, although it comes from the same root. You can be jailed for using the word, “kaffir” for six months in South Africa.

This is a sterling example of how uses of things like “hate-speech” is not hypocrisy, corruption or incompetence but is in fact, dialectics.

Is this a meaningful comparison?

Posted on by

Many years ago when this author first noticed irregularities in the Matrix, shall we say, there was a guy who basically put the entire concept of blogs on the map as a thing.

If I recall properly, his name was Charles Johnson. And he ran a site called Little Green Footballs.

What put him on the map was a single event. He affected the outcome of an election by exposing a narrative lie about George Bush II.

60 Minutes, and then all the rest of the MSM, had decided to get rid of Bush by fabricating a story that he had been dishonourably discharged from the Air Force for some invented reason. The story took and of course, conservatives who support the military, honour and so on, somewhat shifted support away from Bush.

Then comes LGF who noticed that the document 60 minutes showed, was written on Microsoft Word which did not exist in 1973. It was clearly a fraud. The Font and line spacing etc. etc would have to have been done on a word processor and printed. not typed.

The narrative fell apart.

Shortly after that, LGF became irrationally leftist and he lost his following. So irrational, again if I recall correctly, that it seemed unlikely that even he believed the stuff he posted.

Flash forward to basically now:

Julian Assange in 2016 released leaked documents that showed a tiny fraction of Clinton malfeasance and far worse, and probably won the election for Donald Trump. Now Assange is not a conservative per se, except in the sense that he appears to believe in the Bill of Rights. Which should be good enough for all of us frankly.

Assange has now been in a British prison without trial since April 11, 2019

In discussions with an old libertarian like-minded counter-jihadist on Twitter this morning, I was reminded of LGF and Charles Johnson. And it auto-collated.

Did both these men suffer the consequences of interfering with a leftist narrative that slowed the revolution down?

 

Dr. Hodkinson on the legal attacks on Peter McCullough for speaking out against the Vaxx/Covid narrative

Posted on by

In this interview, Dr. Hodkinson focuses on the pressure being applied on Dr. Peter McCullough for his brave stance for medical truth. Both in terms of effective treatments for Covid19, and in terms of exposing the lack of informed consent in terms of taking the new mRNA injections. To put it at its very mildest.

For an excellent write up and related videos, please see this Rair Foundation post