Category Archives: Blasphemy

2015: BBC manipulation to scrub the Islam out of one of the most horrifying mob murders we were allowed to know about

Posted on by

First, please watch this BBC report on the murder of an allegedly devoted Muslim woman in Kabul who was murdered in a way worse than anything you have seen on Chimp Wars.

One of the focus points of this site has been the stunning transformation of Western media outlets into agents of enemy propaganda. But that nomenclature falls so short of the mark it’s a lie of understatement.

Using carefully crafted dialectical narrative attacks, the media does more than any kind of Tokyo Rose blunt force, and even comical level propaganda; it does manipulation of reality on a grand scale, such that its users now put themselves in harms way to support those narratives. Narratives that without that propaganda would be so obviously false, that in a now, barely vestigial rational world, no one would let someone get the end of the sentence when they tried to tell you that a man could declare himself a woman and therefore really was one and had to be treated as such. That an untested brand new injectable gene therapy was a “safe and effective vaccine”. So safe that everyone had to take it or lose their career. Or that ICE law enforcement that are trying to arrest illegal migrants, raping, killing and otherwise tearing down the fabric of society should be run over with your car.

That Western emitted CO2 during the process of doing anything productive would cause an existential climate crisis to the entire planet, as demonstrated by the occasional rise and fall of volcanic islands in the ocean. Yes, somehow the Ocean has learned to rise only in one small spot in the South Pacific.

These are ideas that would be patently unbelievable even in a dystopian future movie if it was made in the 1960s or before. Maybe even much later.

Understanding the machinery of this media manipulation is key. And this site repeatedly tries to expose these tactics. I’ll put a couple of videos below of 2 short speeches given in front of the CBC building back during the post Freedom Convoy, but still remnants of the Covid measures era.

In the case of the BBC video at the top of the post, we ask you all to watch the video very carefully. Take notes of how they frame this murder, the victim, and the killers. Also how the Afghan women allegedly reacted to the killing. Also note please what is not said. What motives were not even mentioned in the BBC report, and remember, it was from 2015. Then click through to RAIR Foundation and read this article on the event.

On the tactics and responsibility of the CBC for their crimes against Canadians:

Ari:

John:

It would be great to see comments where people identify propaganda points about the BBC story in the comments.

Remember, deception of omission is as powerful or more so, than deception by insertion or fabrication. Framing is also important.

I really hope an actual discussion gets going in the comments. To understand this media weaponry as throughly as possible is a solid key to thinking your way out of the Panopticon that has been constructed for the people of the West now.

Leftist Tactics of deflection to shield Islam and its followers from any effective policies to stop shaira: “The tiny minority”

Posted on by

The following interview has gone viral on Twitter and other places on the net. It is a German journalist, one I would suspect is of the left, interviewing an Imam. Keeping in mind that in Suni Islam as I understand it, pretty much anyone can be an imam as the authority is the koran followed by the rest of the cannon such as the Hadiths, the Sunna and Reliance of the Traveler and so on.

So while it is natural to accept the authority of this speaker from his “headgear” (A favorite term of mine coined by the Canadian media when Sikhs demanded exceptions to all our various laws concerning helmets for their turbans) as we do that in general for religious figures and musicians alike, what this man is saying is really just orthodox and near universally accepted belief among Muslims based on Koran and Hadiths.

Following this allegedly shocking interview, the journalist adds post script explaining that there is nothing to worry about here, as it is only a tiny minority who believe these things.

To be clear, it is not. But it might be a tiny minority who act on these beliefs to kill homosexuals. The thing about sharia law which this journalist misses entirely, and it is THE thing about it, is that any and all Muslims are deputized to implement death penalty sentences to people who they deem are guilty of death penalty offences in Islam.

These include ‘offences’ such as sexual misconduct as according to Islam, and belief offences such as apostasy. (Or Trudeau’s favourite, the catch-all of “Making mischief upon the land” which Canada has abbreviated to just ‘Mischief’.)

It is worth noting also that there was also only a tiny minority of Nazis who were in the SS. This doesn’t mean that the rest of them didn’t support the mission of the SS, or supply the needed material support for them.

Beyond that, the issue is the jurisprudence. There is no presumption of innocence, and there is no due process. A person is thought to be guilty of homosexuality or improper belief and they are killed for it.

I am reminded of a case in Pakistan which was my first exposure to sharia law in terms of my personal awareness of it. Two teenagers were in front of a judge, accused of throwing a blasphemous piece of paper towards a mosque from a motorcycle. They faced the death penalty for it. The judge was only allowed to see the box within which was alleged to contain the piece of paper. The judge, according to sharia in that time and place, was not allowed to see anything blasphemous. So he had to convict them, which he did, on the basis of being told there was a blasphemous piece of paper in the box which, he had been told, was thrown towards a mosque by the two boys.

In that case there was the appearance of jurisprudence because there was a judge and a court. But the way it operates makes it really just a conviction-machine with a veneer of confirmatory process. Often there isn’t even that, Muslims act on their own, as Koran makes it clear that the only way into heaven is to die fighting in Allah’s way (Jihad). (If anyone wants to challenge me on that, do it in the comments and I will respond.)

The journalist made two critical errors. First, being horrified at execution of people for certain crimes, and second the nature of the crime.

This allowed the ‘imam’ to counter him on one of them, but he missed the opportunity on the other, to counter that the United States executes people with the electric chair. He might have also pointed out that the West pretends to punish people who have sex with children, and occasionally does if they aren’t in any real position of power or influence. And many people in the West would like to see the death penalty for that.

So once again, the ‘journalist’ managed to create opportunities for Muslims to use relativism to justify sharia, without addressing the real issues with sharia. And those are the total lack of evidence or reality based debate between defence and state, in other words, due process, and any presumption of innocence. So at the end of the day, this interview actually creates space to justify sharia law in the West. After all. this ‘shocked journalist’ did not tell us anything all of us didn’t already know, and almost certainly he already knew it as well. And his lack of meaningful questions tends to make one think this was more predictive programming than an actual opposition of sharia law.

As Diana West often says, quoting a US intel officer, “Beware of anyone claiming to be an expert or on the inside who doesn’t tell you anything you don’t already know”.

Every culture codifies its beliefs and values into law. That is all law is, and this is why multiculturalism is an oxymoron. You cannot have two sets of laws operating in the same area unless you do so in order to destroy one or both. The issue with sharia law is that it codifies a different set of values for sure. But also a different set of processes. Sharia is created to protect the authority of Islam in all ways and in all places. It is not in any way about what is best for the people, or what is true.

It is always about what expands or confirms the authority of Islam, and all decisions will reflect that. Much like communism for that matter. Those people whose actions are counter-revolutionary will be guilty, even where the crime is undefinable or non-existent, like JP Ayout’s. Those who commit actual crimes to the advancement of the revolution will likely not be charged or molested by the police, (see BLM riots from 2020) but if they are, a defence of their ideology from on high will follow and punishments will not be equivalent to those who are counter revolutionary.

Stephen Coughlin thread on the tactical use of “Islamophobia” now of growing importance with UK new laws

Posted on by

Six part Stephen Coughlin thread on X on the critically important use of the term, “Islamophobia” as a catch all to censor all non-revolutionary speech.

Here is Tweet 1/6 but click through for the whole thread.

I decided to reproduce the entire thread here because it is very good and people should see it as its importance to Western Civ has gone up several notches since various Western countries are now implementing Sharia law, even if they disguise it in Marxist language. But Please do click through if you have an X account and re tweet it so that as many as possible can read this thread.

Remember, Hate-speech is just the Marxist equivalent of Islamic Blasphemy laws, but with MUCH wider applications, and not nearly as specific.

Full text of Tweet 1:

1) Islamophobia has no definition – by design. When a term is manufactured to impose one’s will on others that lacks definition, it is a warning that it can mean anything or nothing at all. Stated differently, it means whatever the state wants it to mean.

Hence, the failure to define is a FEATURE, not a FLAW in the drafting

Islamophobia is designed to be interactively interoperable with the intersectional Marxist term “Racism.” Islamophobia is designed to impose Islamic speech laws against non-Muslims in non-Muslim lands.

Check out “Warning on Racism” (word Search “Blair” – and related) –

Tweet 2:

2) At an OSCE Meeting in Warsaw, Poland, in 2013,(below), I directly intervened to get the status on Islamophobia straight from the official horses’ mouths that Islamophobia lacks a definition along lines developed by the OIC and UK-based (the still EU) Marxists (Runnymede Institute) for implementation through international lines.

The Marxist left and the IM have used international forums to introduce, socialize, normalize and then enforce their vocabulary along extra-legal lines while sounding “rule-of-law-ish.” Today, the international language of diplomacy is Marxist in design and intent.

Towards the end, that’s yours truly securing the definition and meaning of Islamophobia from official OIC releases, drafters, and leaders for use in OSCE functions. There is no speculation about Islamophobia – nor its hostile intent.

National leaders who fail to account for this, and even use the term against fellow American citizens, impose Islamic speech laws on U.S. (and N. American, and EU) on American citizens inside the United States – whether they know it or not.

Check it out, this is how the subversion sausage is made (The Runnymede Institute is the Marxist entity that manufactured the term “Islamophobia” in its current use):

 

Tweet 3:

Tweet 3)

In May 2015 in Vienna, Austria, at an official opening forum of the OSCE, we got the official panel to expressly state that saying something known and stipulated to be true can constitute “hate speech.” Hate speech is the Marxist term that Islamophobia is designed to be fully interactive and interoperational with at international, national, and local levels. (It drives the “Palestinian” branded street action on American campuses and streets today).

To be clear, when the UK PM commits to imposing Islamophobia mandates on UK citizens inside the UK, they are engaged in a deliberate effort to supersede UK law in favor of facially neutrally stated Islamic law on slander against those same UK citizens. And it’s a civil rights catastrophe.

KNOW WHAT YOU SEE:

Tweet 4.

It’s a “Dialogue and Praxis” thing. Impose the language and use it, you will become it. Adopt the language of Marxism; YOU WILL EXECUTE the Marxist agenda even when you erroneously believe you’re using it to contest it. The opportunity cost of using the Marxist terms developed to implement Marxist mass lines is that you’re not using your language, and you’re not using the language of freedom. It’s just that simple. (Sorry, but the video is down, but the transcript is still posted)

Tweet 5.

 This is what Islamophobia implements.

The Islamic Law that Islamophobia executes through facially neutral language is that of Islamic notions of slander – which ARE NOT Western notions of the same.

As I explained this back in 2012 when, having just been purged from DOD (again), I put together a makeshift office in my basement. The following was cut in those circumstances, here, to explain Islamic slander laws. (Yes, not looking my best but WT . . .)

 

Tweet 6.

 BTW, Islamophobia laws (“Defamation of Religions” [where only one religion can be defamed]) is what al-Issa is currently socializing to great effect on all those friendly speaking tours, including with the Marxist head of the UN and religious leaders who ought to know better.

Al-Issah runs the Wahhabi World Muslim League (WML)
that is under the direct control of Saudi Arabia and operates in conjunction with KSA policy and OIC guidance.

When interfaith, the Left, and militantly gullible say “building bridges,” force yourself to draw a solid (not a dotted) line to Qutb’s controlling meaning of that phrase.

Rasmus Paludan speaks on the murder of Salwan Momika for criticizing Islam

Posted on by

Last night we booked an interview with Rasmus Paludan to talk about some new charges he is facing, as the various Northern European governments all move to sharia law. A few hours later, what I would call a proxy for the Swedish government, murdered another Islam critic, Salwan Momika  during a live stream broadcast from a Swedish town.

We spoke to Rasmus about that instead.

Here is a detailed story on the assassination of the Iraqi expat 

The RAIR story on the interview

Question: If a person, say, Klaus just to make up a name at random, was to drive over to the log cabin where you live, and dump in truck loads of carpenter ants and termites, pass laws such that you could not call an exterminator, or even describe what these insects did to your cabin, and even make it a crime to call out what you see in front of your eyes and who was doing it, where does the agency lie when the cabin falls down?

 

A question of agency in Islam with Robert Spencer

Posted on by

As some of you may know, I started a Substack to allow for some different materials and ideas to be published with also the hope that a few people might get a paid subscription as a few have mentioned they would like to support this work, but are allergic to PayPal. Substack has an excellent solution for this.

Anyway, so far the focus of the Substack has been to revive older videos I either shot myself, subtitled with the awesome team from Gates of Vienna, or just saved over the last 16 years or so that have been removed from the net and are now perhaps even more relevant and important than they were then. The problem with being too far ahead of the curve on a topic like leftism or Islam, is that the average sleeper cannot take it seriously since its effects aren’t within the 50mm focal length of the average human eye sight.

Since October 7th people seem to be a lot more willing to consider the issue of Islam than they were on October 6th though.

In 2016, ACT4Canada brought Robert Spencer to a secret location in Montreal, (yes it was already so bad in 2016 that you couldn’t have a gentle and scholarly critic of Islam speak publicly) to give a talk on the nature of Islam. Of course that has as far as I know, been removed from the internet.

The talk and full Q&A is available at the Substack post linked here. But below is one question to Robert from that talk on the Islamic view of agency, which I personally think is one of the most critical aspects of the difference between Islamic thought and Western Judeao-Christian-Greco-Roman thought. In other words, who do muslims blame for events and why? Especially when it comes to criticism of Islam, and women on sexual matters.

Robert’s answer is very important. And again, the whole talk and Q&A is linked here.

2013: BBC clip on death for blasphemy laws implemented in Bangladesh

Posted on by

This was in 2013. Death for criticism of Islam or its founder, the pirate Mohammad, is central dogma in Islamic scripture and sharia law. As Muslims become more numerous around the world, the decrease in freedom of speech is becoming obvious already. And while some countries have blasphemy of Islam laws disguised within “hate-speech” laws, most nations avoid speaking truthfully about Islam where muslims are numerous because Muslims will simply kill you themselves. This was the case quite often, certainly in France and the UK, but quite possibly in Denmark over two cartoonists and other less famous examples.

But one only needs to remember the Danish Cartoon Crisis which really began the suppression of freedom of speech in the West, if Salmon Rushdie wasn’t enough of an alarm clock.

The end game is what you see below. And it will happen here. As noted, for many it already has. Just ask anyone who worked at Charlie Hebdo. Or Samual Patty. 

Interview with Michael Stuerzenberger after he received a six month custodial sentence for what is tantamount to Islamic blasphemy

Posted on by

Please read the story details at: https://rairfoundation.com/ground-breaking-germany-sentences-islam-critic-to-six-months-in-muslim-filled-prison-exclusive-interview/

 

Muslims in Sweden use the familiar extra-legal means to destroy rule of law and implement sharia

Posted on by

From RAIR Foundation: Quran Riots in Sweden: Islamic Migrants Violently Seize Control As Police Retreat (Videos)

“Our actions have shown that freedom of speech and freedom of peaceful assembly no longer exists in Sweden. Now, Sharia is the law of the land.” – Rasmus Paludan

On Thursday and Good Friday, Rasmus Paludan, the leader of the Danish Stram Kurs political party, scheduled protests in Sweden against Islamic Supremacy. Paludan organized demonstrations in some of the country’s most dangerous, immigrant-dense areas, widely considered no-go-zones. These protests, which coincide with the Muslim holiday Ramadan, were to show that Islamic values ??are not compatible with liberal Swedish society and its freedom of expression and opinion.

Sweden’s exploding violent migrant crime rate poses a threat to his neighboring country Denmark, explains Paludan, because of the easy access between Scandinavian countries due to the Nordic Passport Union. The Nordic Passport Union allows illegal migrants in Sweden to easily travel and reside in Denmark without any travel documentation or even a residence permit.

Please visit the RAIR link for the rest of the article, and several good videos on this event. 

As he often does, Danish politician and lawyer, Rasmus Paludan has forced Islam to expose itself as non-miscible to Western civilization, but also forced Western governments to expose its own inability to control Muslims within Scandinavia. In this case, the tale of the tape is spectacular.

Thank you Snaphanen.Dk and M for all the examples:

No idea how to embed a Gettr video so here is the direct link.

In this video, police have pistols drawn. Uncertain if fired:

https://twitter.com/PontusPersson5/status/1515093382703554572?s=20&t=s-I051uD3utHrltbQKg-Cg

One way you can tell a leftist from a reasonable person, is that a leftist will think that someone destroying a piece of their own property for whatever reason, is far worse than people destroying much more valuable property belonging to other people because they object to the person who is destroying their own property. Its basically a litmus test for people who may not think they are communists, but have been converted to it by stealth.

 

 

Thorough update on the Islamic forcing of sharia on a UK school

Posted on by

1. British school and local governments capitulate to sharia law with unabashed appology to muslims and a promise of an investigation for showing a cartoon.

For context, if a school showed a Nazi era cartoon to show what Nazi cartoons of Jews were, that would be both OK and even necessary on a course which included Nazi propaganda. So this is about only one thing. Enforcing sharia limits on the West. And its working.

BBC article to get up to speed for those unfamiliar with the tempest in a teapot which this issue should be. As I write this though, it occurs to me, the way to take total control of a teapot is to create a tempest in it.

Prophet Muhammad cartoon sparks Batley Grammar School protest

A teacher who showed pupils an “inappropriate” cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad – sparking protests outside a school – has been suspended.

The image depicting the founder of Islam was used in a lesson at Batley Grammar School on Monday.

Videos posted online show dozens of people standing outside the school on Thursday, with some demanding the teacher be sacked.

The government said it was never acceptable to “intimidate” teachers.

Head teacher Gary Kibble apologised “unequivocally”, adding the member of staff had “given their most sincere apologies” and been suspended pending an investigation.

Apology by school head.

A lone voice worried about the consequences of capitulation?

Tweet calling for protest:

Muslims use the classic threat of jihad against the school in the form of group allah ackbarring.

Statement by spokesman of the muslim community, who may or may not be a parent of one of the children. Chances are not, if its anything like the Sam patty event.

The demand for criminal proceedings against the teacher is much in accordance with UN resolution 16/18 which demanded that each nation enact some kind of legislation that would make Islamic blasphemy or criticism of Islam to be a criminal matter.

With religion and blues musicians as a rule, the bigger and more ornate the hat, the more important the leader or performer. Below, a complex hat delivers a lecture on the matter.

Another video of the protest:

Daily Mail story on some of this. Note that the protestors are not the parents. This is a critical aspect. This is the Islamic use of an extension of the Rahm Emanuel slogan. Create a crisis, then maximize its use.

Thousands sign petition started by students calling for suspended teacher ‘who showed Prophet Mohammed cartoons’ to keep his job – after he was whisked away from home on police advice over death threats

A petition started by students of the teacher suspended by Batley Grammar School has been signed by thousands of people today – at a rate of one per second – as it was revealed he was forced to flee his home because of death threats.   

The ‘burly Yorkshire lad’ in his 20s, who has not been named, is getting support from police after he allegedly showed cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed as the headteacher today kept 980 children at home after 50 Muslim protesters from outside the area turned up for a second day.  

Some of his students have launched a petition trying to save his job, which has been signed by more than 3,000 people by 2pm today, up by 2,000 in the past 12 hours.

People who backed the campaign to save his job have described him as a ‘good man’ and a ‘diligent teacher’ who is ‘respectful of all religions’. Others said the school must stand by him, insisting he was being ‘bullied out’ by ‘radicals’. 

One Muslim parent signed the petition, named Mohammed J, wrote: ‘I would like to convey my support for the school and also the teacher concerned. He has taught my daughter and she speaks very highly of him. I would not hesitate to see him teach her again. I am confident that the teacher concerned did not mean any offence and I hope following an investigation he returns to his role at the school.’

Thank you C. for all your hard work assembling these links.

 

 

 

France sees increasing danger to all teachers who fail to toe Islamic-socialist ideology

Posted on by

The West needs to pay close attention to these events. At this point its surprising that France at least even pays lip service to its own culture and values by offering these teachers protection. In Canada and the US I think we know what would happen to them. And this circumstance will happen more and more often, assuming there are any teachers left willing to stand up for Greek thought, Western values and freedom of conscience and speech.

Please read the whole story and details over at RAIR Foundation

The video that was the call to arms to the jihadi who decapitated a teacher in France over a cartoon

Posted on by

Please go to RAIR Foundation to read a lot of not before reported info on the jihadi murderer of the teacher in France, but also some material that had previously been incorrectly reported elsewhere and is accurate at the RAIR post.

Frau Merkel’s appeal to crush freedom of speech to save freedoms in Germany

Posted on by

Direct link.

Newspeak at its apex. Thank you MissPiggy for the examination and translation of this one.

This is most likely Merkel’s tandem effort with Erdogan and the OIC to impose Islamic blasphemy laws in Germany and by extension, the EU.

As we have come to expect, the method is to use th Frankfurt School’s Political Correctness in order to slide blasphemy laws in under the guise of tolerance. But it is in reality, the Marcusean Repressive Tolerance, which is the gateway to full Soviet like control on what can and cannot be said aloud. And if thoughts that run counter to the official consensus (global warming, men cannot become biological women) are said in private, the power bestowed on the listener to destroy your life makes #Metoo look trivial.