Category Archives: Media bias

Two images from downtown Ottawa July 13, 2024

Posted on by

First, there was a march for Jesus. I am posting a photo from it because no main stream media will cover it at all. It isn’t really much of an event perhaps in that there is not a lot of controversy to drive views. It is organized by mostly black Christian groups I am told, but attracts people of all Christian denominations to come celebrate their love and faith in Jesus first in a public park, and then a short walk around downtown ending on Parliament Hill. I would estimate it at around 600 people attended. This image is from the end of the march as they approach Parliament Hill on Wellington St.

This one is of the National Arts Centre, which has an enormous semi-transparent screen outside on the front about 3 stories tall. On it they rotate images usually for about 20 minutes before they repeat of the various events at the NAC as well as quite often a Ukrainian Flag, although NEVER an Israeli one. I chose this image because it shows NAC Orchestra members performing while wearing those stupid surgical masks. On July 13, 2024. Just in case people think Covid Tyranny and stupidity is behind us. it is not. Doctors who were fired for not taking the shots and destroyed professionally for daring to voice a counter-narrative opinion about them are still destroyed. Some left Canada, others were defrocked so to speak.

The government narrative as expressed by the screen at the NAC will not be let go until it is replaced by another and more destructive one to our liberties and identities.

Geert Wilders victory and let’s play Media Bullsh*t Bingo

Posted on by

PJ Watson on the electoral victory of Geert Wilders

Here is a link to a BBC assassination piece on Wilders. Perhaps we should adopt the Global Warming rhetorical scam-spotting game, Bullsh*t Bingo and adapt it to dialectical tactics by the MSM.

On your card you could have:

Insulting insinuations not used for leftist candidates. An example would be a critique of Wilders’ hair style but never attacking any leftist candidate for hair plugs or dye or any other form of quaff.

“Controversial”. One of my personal favorite dialectical/rhetorical weapons of the MSM. CBC uses it sprinkled on eggs every morning for breakfast. A politician is controversial if he is counter-revolutionary. If that politician or person is a communist revolutionary that word is not used. A general example would be a Prof. of Biology with Ph.D.s in the field, who says that a man cannot simply become a woman by saying so, is controversial. While a man claiming to be a woman on one day to take all the top spots in women’s sports and then going back to being a man afterwards is not controversial. Because of the stance that J.K. Rowling has taken on this, she is now considered a far right wing, and highly controversial figure. A Canadian nurse was investigated in fact, for involvement with a billboard saying I (heart) JK ROWLING.

(Her ordeal is still ongoing as of November 9th this year)

The article continues in more subtle ways to disparage Wilders. They discuss his arrest for a thought crime and that communist UK refused to allow him into the country, even though Wilders at that time was an MPs in the European Union and the UK was still inside the EU. This shows the real nature of the beast. The European Union is a revolutionary organization like the UN. Although their rules stipulate that one country must grant access to members of parliament from other EU states, the truth was that this only applies to agents of the revolution. This site emphasizes the single metric by which all things work today. And that is communist-revolution Vs. counter-revolution. The evidence for this is as common as gravel and salt on the roads in the winter in Canada. All processes work this way. When a court or hearing or ‘Human Rights Tribunal” adjudicates on the actual evidence, rule of law, and real human rights, meaning individual ones and not arbitrarily defined collective ones, it’s the exception.

In the case of Wilders, think of it this way. Leftist activists invent all kinds of bogus organization to create awards to give to left wing activists in order to add gravitas to their agenda. There is one dialectical-Jewish man (He uses his ethnicity as a sword and a shield to advance leftist objectives, hence ‘dialectic Jew) who heads a dialectical communist organization much like the SPLC in the US, in Canada  who even speaks at events sponsored by CAIR-Canada (now NCCM) to combat ‘islamophobia ‘who’s talks are prefaced with all kinds of awards. We see this often with the left. It is a way of getting people to listen, and giving authority to people who have accomplished nothing but are advancing the communist agenda. With Wilders, they invent charges and events which are not legal or proper procedure which they know will fail under scrutiny of any court not yet fully revolutionary. But that doesn’t matter. What does, is that they can talk about the accusation. So kind of the inverse of the awards scam. For leftists, invent fake awards to give gravitas, for counter-revolutionaries, invent charges and prohibitions to destroy their public image. Alinsky Rule 13.

Wilders was convicted of inciting discrimination, although later acquitted, and he was refused entry to the UK back in 2009.

Accused. They took him to court over asking his constituency a question of immigration policy. The actual job of government. They accused and tried him twice of a thought/speech crime because the question he asked, “Do you want more Moroccan immigration (to the Netherlands) or less”? was a counter-revolutionary one. See in a contemporary democracy you have total freedom of speech so long as its all in perfect accordance with the communist nation-destroying, individual-crushing agenda. Wilders dared ask the people of the Netherlands what they want for the future of the Netherlands and was tried twice and acquitted for it. But the BBC uses that accusation as a cudgel. Same as his rejection from the UK, which is actually a breach of rules, if not illegal, of the UK not Wilders. The BBC are dialectical engineers.

For those interested, here is Geert’s closing statement at one of the struggle sessions trials he was put through over this matter:

 

But Europe’s far right believes their views have now become more mainstream.

This one above we all know. It’s called, Moving the Goal Posts. What was once the absolute obvious reasonable goals of any nation state, to protect itself, to protect its citizens, to have equality before law for all etc. etc. is now “far right wing”. There is a double irony here. The left, in what is probably the greatest con of the 20th century, have convinced people that the Nazis are some how right wing. The National Socialist Worker’s Party under Hitler, far right wing by some act of alchemy. The party who”s leader’s speeches, notably at Nuremberg, quoted Marx chapter and Verse, who hated the Russians because he didn’t think they could pull off socialism while the Germans could, those guys were right wing. All powerful state and the crushing of individual rights is in no way right wing. That is Hegelian/Marxist communism. Libertarian, maximal individual rights with minimal state power, is the true right wing. And there is the double, and maybe even triple irony. It means that Wilders, Orban, Trump, The new Argentinian guy, possibly Poilievre in Canada and other people the media call “far right wing” are in reality somewhat right wing, but in the opposite way of the impression they are trying to create. Frankly, by libertarian standards, all these leaders are still more collectivist and big government than is desirable. So in fact they are just more right wing in the good way than the revolutionary communists now running the Western world and its media and institutions. Hence the triple irony.

With a little more effort we could flesh out all the score card points for Bullsh*t bingo of leftist dialectical journalism. Probably all of it from that one BBC article, although I’m sure there are other devices they may have neglected to use in that one article. Feel free to leave ones you may have noticed in the comments.

 

Former Israeli PM takes BBC to task and VERY WELL

Posted on by

…and it’s about f***ing time someone did call them out on air for the manipulative bastards the BBC (and CBC etc.) are.

Even Bennet actually missed one of the BBC’s dialectical engineer’s lies. She tries to correct him when he claims she never asked questions about the Israeli side of the victim issue, and he tripped on it. She explains that she opened up with questions about the hostages. This is a contextual lie. She opened up trying to shape Israeli policy by saying that an attack on Gaza might make getting the hostages back more difficult. So in other words, she lied. She used the hostages as a dialectic to force the exact side of the narrative he accused her of.

I really hope former Israeli PM Bennett sees this post.

Examining media tactics to deconstruct classical thought and civilizational cornerstones: Links 1 for September 22nd, 2023

Posted on by

1. This is an excellent example of one of the media cons used to destroy our civilization right down to the conceptual level. I used to think of it as ‘sleight of hand with levels of abstraction’. In other words, false equivalence. In this example they claim that Hungary is being hypocritical because they are presented as anti-immigration but are dependant on immigrants for certain kinds of labour and treat them quite well.
This is conflating invasion with immigration. In pre-revolutionary times, all nations were anti-invasion and all where fine with vetted, predetermined immigration to get people with skills that enhance the nation and are not a drain or increase in crime, as well as fit in culturally. The media conflates invasion with immigration creating the illusion of hypocrisy. If you do not allow your nation to be literally negated by mass immigration, crushing your culture, economy and so on, you are anti-immigrant. The same tactics the left uses to force a narrative on most issues. Like saying you don’t want a public school to talk your young son to have his penis and testicles cut off means you are a fascist and against trans-rights. Whatever that is.

By way of analogy, one could make the same case about Hungary’s family planning policies. Euronews could say, ‘Hungary paid families to have children by offering reduced taxation and other incentives by lessened government pressures while ironically keeping rapists in jail”. Or, ‘Hungary’s department stores are having a sale to encourage shoppers while ironically putting thieves in jail.’  The false equivalence works this way. A rapist and a couple making love both are having sex. A thief and a customer are both removing goods from a shop. A little jump-shift in level of abstraction to make an equivalence while also removing the major component of volunteerism. A slave is the same as a farm hand because they both pick cotton. Be wary when watching dialectical news. They lie right to your face while fully equanimous but for those who remember the age of reason, a moment’s thought and it becomes clear. This is a good reason to cut off all live TV and only see ‘news’ as clips on YouTube where you can pause it when they insert a dialectic of one kind or another. This way you can pause and think before moving on with the clip. It would be interesting to see what percent of people who did or did not take the vaxx watch TV. One might suspect that those who did not watch TV took the vaxx far less than those who do. As even the left admitted during the first major push for mandates of one kind or another, those of us who were against masks and vaxx had more and better information than the pushers did, hence they suggested other more Critical theory means to get people to obey. So less TV means more information if this hypothesis is correct. (Cannot find that set of news items from a couple of years ago. I hope you all remember that amazing little story)

2. Jamie Sarkonak: Public must pay for gender-affirmation surgeries abroad, says Ontario review board

If there are guardrails on Ontario’s coverage for niche genital surgeries, they are very low

When a public health authority is asked to subsidize a novel, understudied medical procedure, it can say “no.” If it says “yes,” it better have good reasons, because the rest of us have to pay for it. Those being made to pay for unproven treatments have the right to question why exactly they’re being forced to pony up the cash.

Those questions are now justifiably being asked by Ontarians about publicly funded sex-change operations. The Health Services Appeal and Review Board’s (HSARB) recent ruling on what procedures must be covered by the public has opened the door to funding just about any novel surgery — even those that are so niche, no surgeon in Canada can (or will) perform them.

Advancing the case was a 33-year-old non-binary male patient, known as KS, who identified as “female dominant.” KS came to the review board after having been denied public coverage for a “penile preserving vaginoplasty” (a surgery that adds an opening to serve as female genitalia, without removing the penis), which isn’t listed on the slate of sex-reassignment procedures covered by the province.

In fact, this procedure isn’t offered by any doctor in Canada — the standard vaginoplasty here involves the “penile inversion” technique. The “penile preserving” technique must be performed abroad; KS asked to be sent to a specific clinic in Austin, Texas (the clinic told me, over the phone, that gender-affirming genital surgeries can range from US$10,000-US$70,000 (C$13,500-C$94,000), depending on what exactly is being done).

3. PJ Watson on Russel brand. No, this is in fact much more than gossip. This is examining a weapon against anyone who is seen as an effective agent of the counter-revolution. PJW understates his own case though. When he discusses a BBC journalist examining if platforms planned to remove Brand in every aspect, well, let’s just say we know more than one person personally where a “journalist” actually used the power of the publicity they could generate and a dialectical spin on the story to make sure that people who stood in the way of the revolution where destroyed as thoroughly as possible, short of anything that could get them jailed for a long time. Alinsky rule XIII. But much more refined than it was in Alinsky’s day. We also know with certainty that the left uses issues to create a revolutionary positive result, that has nothing to do with the issue itself. The expression, “With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point” is very important to understand. In this case its more than the destruction of Brand. It is about the destruction of a central pillar of Western thought. The Presumption of Innocence. One cannot have a proper communist authoritarian state until we can do away with that particular central dogma of Western jurisprudence. Communism, like Islam, requires the accusation to be all that is needed to remove an obstacle to state power and state narratives. Watson refrences the presumption of innocence at around 4:50. That is likely the real issue. Speaking of the point is never the point, if only we could figure out why Trudeau is trying to make another Kashogi issue out of a Sikh assassinated in Surry BC apparently. Is it because they send useful meds by mail for Covid, encouraging “vaccine hesitancy”? That makes more sense than anything official.

4. Dr. John Campbell: mRNA in breast milk and the lies they told you to put it there

5. M Files: Enemy propaganda on the mRNA injection push that is ramping up for this fall. Note authors, times and messages.

CANADIAN PRESS –

Amid vaccine fatigue, doctors say the updated COVID-19 shot is important this fall
[…]Health Canada recently authorized an updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, manufactured by Moderna, thattargets the XBB.1.5 Omicron subvariant circulating now. The federal government is sending the new vaccine out to the provinces and territories, which are in charge of rolling it out to the public.
“I think the timing is going to be good,” said Dr. Jeffrey Pernica, head of the division of infectious disease at McMaster University in Hamilton.
[…]HOW THE NEW VACCINES WORK
The updated vaccines specifically target the coronavirus subvariants that are circulating right now, which are “pretty different from the original recipe,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan.
[…]So even if you got the bivalent booster, it’s still worth getting the new shot targeted to XBB.1.5, she said.
[…]Dr. Lawrence Loh, executive director of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, agrees.
[…]It is safe to get both the COVID-19 booster and the flu shot at the same time, the Public Health Agency of Canada said.
[…]”I think what we sort of leave out when we think about why people don’t get vaccinated is logistics,” said Dr. Kumanan Wilson, chief scientific officer at the Bruyère Research Institute in Ottawa and an immunization researcher. “Make access as easy as possible.”
more :
https://www.thestar.com/life/health-wellness/amid-vaccine-fatigue-doctors-say-the-updated-covid-19-shot-is-important-this-fall/article_69a9db57-a79e-5206-b254-e13701189d58.html
================================
same author – FEB 2023 :
COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy helps protect newborns, Canadian study suggests
Protection most effective when mothers got 2nd or 3rd mRNA dose during pregnancy, study says
[…]Canadian infectious diseases specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists and immunologists have long urged pregnant people to stay up to date on their COVID-19 vaccinations — including boosters — because they are at higher risk of serious illness if they become infected.
That in turn can harm the fetus, they say.
The study shows that getting vaccinated during pregnancy is also “of great benefit to the infant” after they’re born
more :
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/covid-vaccination-pregnancy-canadian-study-1.6741947
======================
LILLEY UNLEASHED: Dr. Tam’s mask sham!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0Cta8yk6kc

 

Perhaps its worth revisiting our interview with Dr. James Thorp. A highly credentialed OBGYN on the issue of the mRNA and pregnant women and the newly arrived.

Also having a look at this article: https://rairfoundation.com/exposed-leaked-hospital-email-reveals-explosion-of-stillbirths-video/

Thank you all for checking out this site and its perspective.

There is a renewed conversation about Canadian official media, now weaponized past the point of merely being state propaganda. At this point, the main three TV stations, Global, CTV and especially perhaps, CBC are now dialectic weapons of destruction alongside the state as instructed by the ideology of the COMINTERN.

Below, a few videos about the CBC by ex-reporters from that institution. If you have not seen them, it is well worth the watch. As always please click the little gear at the bottom and select the highest quality stream if you want to watch with the best clarity.

Rodney Palmer testifies to the NCI in Ottawa:

The Q&A from the video above:

Rodney Palmer testifies earlier to the NCI in Toronto:

CBC’s Cathy Jones at the NCI

CBC’s Marianne Klowak:

The following is an opinion speech about CBC given at a protest of that organization sometime last winter. It is a very close approximation of how this site felt about that attack vector at that time.

CBC gets served on Parliament Hill Yesterday

Posted on by

People are on to the tactics of CBC overall. Perhaps not the reasons, or each and every nuanced dialectic the CBC used to push the revolution ever onwards, but a lot of people generally know that CBC is at the very least a lying sack of vulture puke. Here a woman tells her story to the CBC reporter that had the temerity to show up on the Hill and finishes with a beautiful summation of what the CBC is. Please watch to the end and enjoy every second of it. The CBC got served. As far as I know, they did not show this video.

CBC interviewed Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson yesterday as well. If anyone happens to find the interview, please post the link to the comments and perhaps, just perhaps we can find another camera that filmed that interview to compare it with. I believe one of her own people filmed it but others did as well.

From a comment below:

https://twitter.com/therationalpost/status/1704950275847413958

 

When the proof of the real nature of the Freedom Convoy is overwhelming, what do you think govt and law will determine?

Posted on by

8,456 views Nov 15, 2022
8,456 views • Nov 15, 2022

As the inquiry into Justin Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act continues on, Jen, the creator of the convoylive.com joins me to talk about why she created this amazing archive of largest peaceful protest in Canadian history. Visit the website here: www.convoylive.com

 

NBC redacts its own report on underwear hammer attack

Posted on by

How corrupted is MSM in the US? Well, now and again they manage to sneak in an actual news report which is problematic for the controllers and they remove it lickety-split.

Tucker spoke about this last night. Will post that show soon.

One example of countless on how Google’s bias created propaganda and not information

Posted on by

I was searching for the website for America’s Front Line Doctors for a friend and got this result from Google:

A stunning amount of links that diminished the group I was looking for, and none of them brought me to their material. Just attacks on them and competition to them from the other side.

Then I tried Duckduck go:

Every result was what I was actually looking for and related hits.

It is stunning that Google still exists as a search engine. At this point, Google is to finding what you want online what CBC, CNN, or BBC is to news.

Facebook and blatant manipulation of opinion goes back several years at least. Remember Tommy Robinson policy?

Posted on by

Recently, Project Veritas released materials with hidden recordings of Facebook insiders revealing some of the lengths they go to, in order to manipulate public opinion, and force a narrative on the world. This narrative has nothing to do with facts, or public health. What it does have to do with, is a matter of speculation. But what is fact, is that Facebook has been doing this for years and years. Covertly and overtly.

While discussing the Project Veritas materials with a colleague, a memory of a Danish TV interview with the top man for Facebook in Scandinavia surfaced, where overtly, not on hidden camera, but right there at a news desk, in front of all of Denmark, on TV, he explained that Facebook had a policy whereby Tommy Robinson was banned from the platform, and anyone who posted anything of his would be blocked or banned, and no supportive posts would be tolerated. But, the Facebook executive explained, anything bad someone wanted to say about Tommy Robinson would be allowed. And presumably promoted.

This needs to be added to the recent Project Veritas materials on Facebook for a more complete understanding of the true hideousness that make up the Zuckerberg organization.

This clip was translated and published sometime before September, 2019:

Here are the new Project Veritas materials on Facebook’s deceptiveness and manipulations.

Documents here.