Studies on mask use and Covid suppressed while some areas double down on forced masking OUTDOORS

1. Danish study shows that masks do not do what we are forced to believe they do

Delingpole: Why Won’t Top Medical Journals Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study?

Do masks protect against Chinese coronavirus and reduce its spread — or are they, as their critics maintain, mere empty gesture politics?

A major study which might finally have answered this question has been postponed indefinitely after three of the world’s top three medical journals mysteriously declined to publish it.

The researchers behind a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask are having great difficulty in getting their research results published. One of the participating professors in the study admits that the still secret research result could be perceived as ‘controversial’.

For weeks, the media and researchers around the world have been waiting with increasing impatience for the publication of a large Danish study on the effect – or lack thereof – of wearing a mask in a public space during the corona pandemic.

Now one of the researchers who has been involved in the study has said that the finished research result has been rejected by at least three of the world’s leading medical journals.

These include the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA.

“They all said no,” says the Chief Physician in the Research Department at North Zealand Hospital, Professor Christian Torp-Pedersen.

However, the Professor does not wish to disclose the journals’ reasoning.

Let us all remember that the New England Journal of Medicine AND The Lancet knowingly published fake ‘studies’ on the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine for the purpose of discrediting that treatment, not to inform the public. The studies were so badly faked that enough scientists screamed loudly forcing retractions. But no policy changes came making the treatment available. The fact that these journals did not accept these studies at this stage makes it reasonable to think that the Danish study is well done, but contradicts the narrative, or more accurately, the “consensus” (political position taken by a small group to be imposed on a large group which usually imposes a pseudo reality at the expense of actual reality) and therefore must not be stamped with the rapidly diminishing credibility of these once great publications. Hopefully like their fellow Danish scientists who discovered through rigorous application of the scientific method that the Earth’s climate is driven by the sun, and that CO2 levels FOLLOW temperature changes and not the other way around, these Danes will also go straight to the public with a film.

To prove a point, the German Government in a fully Orwellian way, is now sending the police forth in the streets of Frankfurt to announce that masks are mandatory for all OUTSIDE now. Which adds a lot of weight to the theory directly above:

Translation below:

“To all pedestrians on Schweizer Strasse,
Due to the increasing corona numbers, the city of Frankfurt has decided in a general decree that in every shopping street as well as (every?) Schweizer street, mouth and nose covers are to be worn on the street to protect everyone at all times. Put on a mouth and nose cover, otherwise you may be fined.”

So there you have it. Germany is making mask wearing mandatory OUTSIDE on the basis of ‘cases’ almost certainly from increased testing and not serious illness, even as evidence mounts that masks may not do what we are told they do.

Meanwhile, as Christmas Markets in Germany likely fold, some effort is being made to make masks more festive at the expense of, well an actual festival. What we need are masks that say, “This is s token of communist control”

 

Good article on the “mostly peaceful murder” of a Trump supporter

Article here:

In part:

A man participating in what was billed as a “Patriot Rally” sprayed mace at a left-wing demonstrator, and the left-wing demonstrator shot him with a handgun. Ambulances responded to the scene. Police said Saturday afternoon they were working on a homicide investigation.

Never forget that the enemy always gets a vote.

UPDATE: the killer is “a self-described BLM/Antifa member”, which will presumably inspire the media to describe the murder a “mostly peaceful” one.

UPDATE: Now the killer is reported to be a bodyguard for Denver 9NEWS. But he looks more like he’s taking the offensive in a close-up photo of the shooting.

UPDATE: “The fake news media is literally killing conservatives. Do not go near them. Could end up shot and killed.”

[Click through for the rest. Still looking for video of the murder which apparently is out there and is clear.]

Thank you Gates of Vienna, who just celebrated 13 years in existence this week!

MORE:

Leading up to the shooting:

CBC demonstrates how it creates enemy propaganda from minor events

CBC actually claims in this bit that Trump “repeatedly and falsely says there is the potential for fraud” with mail in ballots.

Not only is there potential for fraud, but the Austrian election a few years ago had to be redone because the left had cheated it so much with mail ins. In fact after a whole new election, it was the conservatives (more or less) who won, whereas the first election attempt, they had won but it was overturned with mail ins.

In the 2016 election in the US, some districts which Trump won, got turned over with mysteriously found mail in ballots in enormous quantities. And even the Green party leader, who is widely suspected of being funded by Soros, attempted to do recounts on some areas where Trump had one, only to discover that he had won by a larger margin than had previously been announced officially.

So here we see how and why the CBC has earned for itself, so much public contempt that its crews no longer wear any insignias on the street and can only be identified by tiny stickers on their cameras which you have to ask them directly to see. CBC doesn’t show up to non-leftist events at this point and offer any coverage at all, but does show up for every little minor communist inspired or leftist event, even if its just a half dozen ACORN activists and make sure they get national coverage.

The spin doctoring here is so fast you may need an antiemetic to avoid getting nauseous. They attempt to spin President Trump’s answer, which is that if there is no cheating he will not have to leave office, and if there is cheating there won’t be a peaceful transition of power because it is not an honest election. This is what any leader would say. But CBC’s attempt to make President Trump appear to be refusing to relinquish power is what that COMINTERN network has come to.

For anyone still in doubt, it might be worth waiting till next week for this:

Here is the ACTUAL ANSWER to the question:

Oh yeah and one last thing:

More on the thrown away mail in Greenville:

 

Doctor who appeared in HCQ conference, fired, and is suing CNN

One of the central doctors trying to tell us all that Hydroxychloroquine is part of an effective treatment for Wuhan Flu, CCP virus, was fired due to media reaction and has retained the services of Lin Wood, the same lawyer who took CNN to the cleaners representing Nick Sandmann.

Below is the entire presser she did along with other doctors on HCQ. Skip ahead to about 4 minutes.

Addendum: I have been trying to add the Tucker Carlson segment into this post with the doctor he interviews. It is STUNNING how the search engines have been tuned against Tucker Carlson now. Search Youtube, or Google, or Twitter for Tucker Carlson and you will find a litany of nasty anti-Carlson materials often having nothing to do with your search parameters other than it conforms to Marxist critical theory as a way of negating his influence. Eventually that clip will appear somewhere and we will make a new post with it. But that is where we are at now. Rule of law has been ‘Aufheben’ or replaced with something closer to a MAFIA based system where large groups willing to use violence, this would be Islamic groups and leftist ones, have created an anti-state at every level so what is actually the law, or are your constitutional rights, matter nothing compared to the consequences of going against these group’s imposed ‘laws’ on you. Which of course is the point of this entire article. Samisdat is all we have now against Aufheben. And we had all better get on board with that.

Thank you EB for finding this!

 

NYT now advocates for the end of the merit principle altogether

Link to New York Times page

Indeed. Contemplate the enormity. It is Harrison Bergeron being demanded and nothing less. The Dystopian future novels set is nearly complete.

Resignation letter to the New York Times of Bari Weiss

This was powerful enough that it was worth getting out of bed and posting.

I joined the paper with gratitude and optimism three years ago. I was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who would not naturally think of The Times as their home. The reason for this effort was clear: The paper’s failure to anticipate the outcome of the 2016 election meant that it didn’t have a firm grasp of the country it covers. Dean Baquet and others have admitted as much on various occasions. The priority in Opinion was to help redress that critical shortcoming.

I was honored to be part of that effort, led by James Bennet. I am proud of my work as a writer and as an editor. Among those I helped bring to our pages: the Venezuelan dissident Wuilly Arteaga; the Iranian chess champion Dorsa Derakhshani; and the Hong Kong Christian democrat Derek Lam. Also: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Masih Alinejad, Zaina Arafat, Elna Baker, Rachael Denhollander, Matti Friedman, Nick Gillespie, Heather Heying, Randall Kennedy, Julius Krein, Monica Lewinsky, Glenn Loury, Jesse Singal, Ali Soufan, Chloe Valdary, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Wesley Yang, and many others.

But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Please read the rest at Bariweiss.com

We suggest downloading and saving the page as it likely won’t be online long.

Adding tweets as we find them:

“The real story is the loss of the news altogether, and the news cannot report on it”

President Trump reminds the media who they really are and what they really do

Trudeau keeps trying to hide his errors. Its like he has never heard of The Streisand effect

The story:

DISTURBING: Video Of Trudeau Giving Poutine To Laughing Reporter & Saying “The Liberal Party Always Supports The CBC” Has Been Taken Down

Who requested removal, and why?

A deeply disturbing incident has changed the conversation from media bias, to outright election interference by the establishment press.

 

Earlier, @CanadaBuster shared a video, showing a CBC reporter fawning over attention from Justin Trudeau, accepting poutine fries with a hearty laugh. It was notable because the CBC reporter – David Cochrane – had previously been defending Justin Trudeau’s indefensible avoidance of the reporters questions and scrutiny.

 

The video spread rapidly, showing in clear picture how fawning much of the media is over Trudeau – a huge contrast to their brutal coverage of the Conservatives.

But then, the Twitter account – which is often anti-Trudeau – where it was spread was the subject of a ‘copyright’ removal. It was seemingly removed everywhere except Global News.

Video below:

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmNa8zNXZacLnYZp9GWcvcnnmjMmfbbrHo9XbL4MVEphLC