Category Archives: War on women’s rights

French teen gets her own police protection after short video with plain talk about Islam

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Where to begin with this one.

Many men have gone to jail or faced court for saying less than this about islamic immigration or islam. But we have to be pleased that in this case, she is getting protection.

But then we have the problem that if the French state is going to offer protection to anyone who tells the truth about Islam, or more directly, speaks in a way about Islam which is not favourable, then France is clearly going to have to import millions of muslims and hire them to be guards for people who do not like Islam and say so. Because the obvious solution of using the rule of law, and ending the immigration of hundreds of thousands of people who adhere to a retrograde ideology which is antithetical to Western thought and culture, and I am being so kind in my language that it is effectively a lie of omission, will not be considered.

Marine Le Pen is France’s only hope of surviving as a French polity as is Salvini’s Italy’s.

For more on the story of what happened to this young woman, please read this Daily Mail article. 

Jihad Watch article on Sweden’s retail sector and how muslim immigration is hurting women’s employment

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

Link to Jihad Watch article:

“Independent journalist Joakim Lamotte has claimed that women working at Stockholm’s Kista Galleria shopping centre are quitting their jobs due to harassment from foreign men who refuse to be served by women…..The women also allegedly claimed that many of the male customers would refuse to be served by them, demanding to be served by a male coworker instead. ”

 

Since 2017, Jihad Watch has reported that even Swedish feminists were running away from no-go zones. They have been rather silent about abuse from migrant men; yet only a couple of months before that Jihad Watch report, over a thousand protesters in Stockholm came out to demonstrate against Trump, when they should have been opposing misogynist Muslim men over Sharia-based discrimination against women and infidels — those same men that they were running away from not long after. […]

Video of secret recording of muslim complaining to store and threatening with police because he was served by a woman:

A group of women try and take back the right to be on the street in Creil France

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

A few years ago we titled a video made by a couple of French women that would not get served in Cafe’s in parts of Paris because muslims. Clearly the situation is much worse now.

The video below are excerpts from a “Dossier Tabou” documentary from October of 2017, showing the way women are de facto banned from streets and cafés in a neighbourhood of Creil (a town 70km [45mi] north of Paris).

Here is one we did in 2016 which was a news piece on another one we did earlier, which this one refers to. If that is too confusing, basically this one below is how bad it was in 2016 and the one above is now.

Yes, time machines do exist. You just have to break about 70% of muslims in an area and you go back about 1400 years. Except for cell phones and machine guns of course.

One other point about the video above. Notice how multiple times, the TV presenter refers to the women as “militants”. This is critical to understand how consensus is built and how we are manipulated into being enemies of ourselves.
“Militants” is also the term the media uses to describe Islamic State terrorists who do mass killing and torture operations for the advancement of Islamic supremacy.
So the government-media complex, the leftist-Islamic propaganda machinery in other words, equates two women trying to go to a cafe in a Paris suburb with a Muslim terrorist who decapitates people for dressing out of Islamic edicts or saying a bad thing about Islam.

Now it might be worth having another look at the nature and purpose of consensus, which is not to be confused with agreement.

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmSojBXPV414w7RQmS5Kbw4dAPoQoXyNnRn2qJuhY23DvM

Shiia islamic clerics pimp 9 year olds for fun and profit

Posted on by — 6 Comments ↓

Really pay attention just after the 20 minute mark.

H/T M.

 

Don L. sent the following email about this video being pulled.

If all these fail, we shall see what we can do to make it available.

Hello Vlad,
The video of the Islamic pimps called “Iqaq’s Secret Sex Trade has been pulled from your post here:
Incredibly the Muslims want the documentary pulled as it “disrespects” Islam.
Here are two links to that , David Wood and the Daily Mail
and
and because shit disappears on the Internet here’s the archive:

BBC clip on Saudis fleeing Islam in the KSA

Posted on by — 17 Comments ↓

Proof that the BBC is not as driven by a postmodern narrative as Canada’s CBC.

Or its more afraid of what should happen to a state broadcaster who betrays it’s own people and the truth itself once the people catch on. Either way, the CBC is unlikely to ever do anything even this honest.

h/t Wrath of Khan.

On the current acceptability of actual science in our postmodern societal rules

Posted on by — 25 Comments ↓

 Academic paper on evolution flushed down the memory hole.

To understand the enormity of the importance of this article, I once again refer to the (probably soon to be illegal) excellent documentary, Dogs Decoded. Pay special attention to how the Soviet Union treated actual science, especially evolutionary biology, that contradicted Marxism’s axioms.

Especially the segment on Silver Fox bred in the barn for domesticity or aggression. This renegade experiment, while illegal in all ways in the Soviet Union has been invaluable ever since for real science in the understanding of certain attributes which we can loosely call, domestication. This article may be experiencing a less blunt force train of events than the Russian experiment on Silver Fox, but for the precise same reason our Russian evolutionary-biologist had to hide his intentions and methods from the government. But the subtle and frankly, pure Postmodernist way in which it was done is in fact far more effective in preventing the work from reaching academic circles.

The only thing it can use for potential exposure is the Streisand effect, which of course is why I link to it here. And the fact that it appears here, will be used as an excuse as to why they believed that this truth must not be known. And the great truth that is so scary?

Men and women are biologically different in general.

Here is an excellent video on this subject of the state of academia today:

Remember this moment from a James Damore discussion?

 

 

 

23 YO girl in Iran sentenced to 1 year in jail for no head cloth

Posted on by — 8 Comments ↓

As Dr. Peterson says: