School History being re-written in the UK.

Here are a few choice excerpts from a DoE paper “Teaching Emotive and Controversial History 3-19”

“For example, a history department in a northern city recently avoided selecting the Holocaust as a topic for GCSE coursework for fear of confronting anti-Semitic sentiment and Holocaust denial among some Muslim pupils.”

“In another history department, the Holocaust was taught despite anti-Semitic sentiment among some pupils, but the same department deliberately avoided teaching the Crusades at Key Stage 3 because their balanced treatment of the topic would have directly challenged what was taught in some local mosques.”

bringing this to you via David A Levy…
So finally after years of rumour and denial of rumours Britain’s Department for Education and Skills and The Historical Association have finally admitted in a report ( that many schools have decided to not include the Holocaust in history lessons as it offends some Muslims.

Why? What’s so offensive about the holocaust to Muslims?

The report mentions that an educator from northern England stated that there “was a fear of confronting anti-Semitic sentiment and Holocaust denial among some Muslim pupils.”

Those educators have my sympathies, we confront anti-Semitic sentiment and Holocaust denial on this groups page almost daily, however I don’t believe that that’s in itself a reason not to teach the truth about the holocaust and personally I believe that there is another reason why Muslims don’t want to learn about the holocaust as wellIslamists have spent the last 40 years and more building up the facade that they are the victims, the victims of the the crusades, the victims of Zionism, the victim of the UN, the victims of their own leaders corruption etc etc etc .Islamists have become professional victims, whether its spousal murder or bombing a school bus or flying a plane into a building islamists always claim that they did so because they are the victim of some crime- to me it appears that they are professional victims seeking an excuse to justify the violence that is so inherent in and to their ideology.

They CANNOT allow any other group, especially Jews, to in any way be seen as the victims in any incident, I suppose that’s why I’ve NEVER EVER ONCE EVER heard an Muslim admit that Jews were persecuted, humiliated and subjected to horrific treatment under Islamic rule despite such treatment having been documented in detail.

I believe that that is the entire problem. Muslims are oblivious to the 1400 years or mayhem and destruction that they have caused in their quest for conquest in the name of Allah. Until they lift this veil from the narrative that they are being taught no substantive change towards peace will be made in the 20 odd conflict areas around the world that involve Muslims



Now that’s called anti-Semitism

Jews living in Judah, Samaria and in J’Lem, (48′ war of Independence Jews were driven out of E.J’lem) wanting to live as Jews, is considered “Judaization” of these ancient Jewish areas, while mass numbers of Muslims moving into traditional Christian Europe and demanding non-Muslim compliance to Islamic norms…is supposedly not Islamization.

Those of us however, who bring attention to what’s going on, and reject to what’s happening to their civil liberties and rights in the liberal West, are the new ‘bigots’. See how that works folks? Anywhere else Europeans moved to non European countries and imported their unique ideals that stemmed from the enlightenment, it was later deemed as colonialist imperialism and considered evil.

Here the same is happening inside Europe in the 21st century, and it’s called “multiculturalism”, and it’s all good!

Mahmoud Abbas: Jerusalem only has Islamic and Christian history

Mahmoud Abbas: Jerusalem only has Islamic and Christian history, Israel’s “Judaization” is stealing Jerusalem’s “cultural, human, and Islamic-Christian religious history”

Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor: Israel is creating “artificial heritage with a Jewish spirit at the expense of its [Jerusalem’s] true and authentic [identity] as an Arab, Islamic and Christian city”

by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority continue to deny Israel’s 3,000 years of history in Jerusalem, claiming it is solely an Arab, Muslim and Christian city. Earlier this month, Abbas referred to Israel’s presence and activities in Jerusalem as “Judaization” and stated that Israel is stealing what he called the “cultural, human, and Islamic-Christian religious history.”

Last month, Abbas’ advisor for Jerusalem said that Israel is trying:

“to create an artificial heritage with a Jewish spirit at the expense of its true and authentic [identity] as an Arab, Islamic and Christian city.”

This is not the first time that Abbas has denied Jewish history in Jerusalem and claimed the city for Islam alone. Palestinian Media Watch has reported that Mahmoud Abbas said that taking Jerusalem from Israel is a religious Islamic obligation of the highest level, a “fard ayn” – a personal Islamic commandment incumbent on every Muslim:

“I say to the leaders of our Arab nation and to its peoples: Jerusalem and its environs are a trust that Allah entrusted to us. Saving it [Jerusalem] from the settlement monster and the danger of Judaization and [land] confiscation is a personal [Islamic] commandment [Arabic: fard ayn] incumbent on all of us. Therefore, I call all of you to serious and urgent action to save [Jerusalem] and to make available all possibilities in order to strengthen our resolve and to maintain its historical, cultural and religious character.”

[Al-Jazeera TV, March 27, 2010]

More here.

Various Islamic orgs. prepare to aid the Muslim, North Sudan in its efforts to destroy Christian, animist and even black-Muslim South Sudan


A coalition of Islamic jihadist groups are working together to aid the Sudanese government in its military campaign against South Sudan, WND has learned.

In Gaza, Hamas and the al-Qaida-allied Popular Resistance Committees held a rare meeting last week to discuss methods of support for the Sudanese Republic, according to informed Arab officials.

The officials said Jihadiya Salafiya, a Gazan jihad group that works under the ideological banner of al-Qaida, already started recruiting fighters to aid the Sudanese Army.

Jihadiya Salafiya is the military wing of the same Salafist group that just endorsed Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, a former leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, in his run for Egyptian president.

Click to continue:

More on Sudan

On March 15th the US held Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings with George Clooney among many others to discuss the new attempt at genocide, both culturally, religiously as well as racially, against the Christian and Animist South Sudanese.

I have been spending some time going over the C-SPAN footage of these hearings to the extent that time allows.

Below, a short excerpt from a longer excerpt below that. I think its laudable that the US at least allowed that short meek reference to the truth behind the motives for this relentless attack against the South Sudanese by the Arab-Muslim north, given the degree of Islamic influence in the US government today. It wasn’t much, but at least it was said.

I am working on the longer excerpt now which should appear below shortly. In any case, the motives are clearly stated for the constant horror against the Christian, black, non-Muslim south in the clip above.

Sarkozy (and media): “The Muslim faith has nothing to do with the insane acts of this man”

This graphic by Bosch Fawstin beautifully sums up the French President's cowardice. See more of Bosch's work at

From the time the perpetrator of the Toulouse massacre turned out to be a jihadist, there’s been a concerted effort by the Lamestream media to shove the entire incident under the carpet – noticed it?

Whereas before, when they happily concluded a “right-winger” must be responsible, every effort was made to tar Marine Le Pen with responsibility so that the media’s Left wing chums in French politics could benefit from these deaths; now it’s an irrelevant aberation by a diseffected and alienated “French citizen” – and of course, “nothing to do with Islam.”

Where are the press flow charts, the impressive graphics, the fine-tooth-comb examinations of the killer’s “manifesto”, the weeks of lengthy essays by “extremism specialists” pointing to malevolent “worldwide networks” that followed the Breivik slaughter?

There’s been none of it! Just a silent attempt to shoosh everything away and return the populace back to more important matters like reality television and celebrity bra sizes. We’ve been doing our best over here at Vlad Tepes to counter this, and the good folk over at JihadWatch have been putting up a valiant fight too.

Here for example, is an absolute tour de force from Dr Spencer:

from JihadWatch

Imam Sarkozy on Toulouse jihadist: “The Muslim faith has nothing to do with the insane acts of this man”

Muhammad Merah’s murders had everything to do with Islam: he claimed affiliation with al-Qaeda and may have trained with the Taliban, both of which are explicitly and ostentatiously Muslim groups that justify all their actions by reference to the Qur’an and Sunnah. He claimed to be a mujahid, which is a warrior of jihad, which is an Islamic theological and legal concept.

He killed Muslim soldiers who fought in the infidel military — something that only someone who considered one’s loyalty to the umma to trump all other loyalties would have done. So grounded is Merah’s massacre in Islam that it is virtually inconceivable that he would have carried it out had he not been a Muslim.

And so Sarkozy is, like every other leader in the West, whistling in the dark, trying to pretend that there is no problem when there is a huge problem, and basing the future of his nation on the fantasy that the overwhelming majority of Muslims in France do not believe the same things Muhammad Merah believed…

click through for the rest

Allah Most High has chosen the Arabs over other nations

Just in case there is a solitary can-of-cahsews out there that thinks that Islam, as well as being ideologically supremacist and profoundly violently so, isn’t also a vehicle for Arab or racial supremacy, I thought I would post this fatwa. Below is part of it. You can click through for the rest if you want but you will get the idea. This of course makes it even more odd that a black, white or East Asian and perhaps even a South Asian of non-arab decent would ever convert to Islam. But then, Islam was never a way of life for thinking individuals.


I saw in the chapter of suitability of marriage that Allah has chosen Arabs over others. The outer purport of this hadith contradicts the sunna, can you explain?


In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful 

The fact that Allah Most High has chosen the Arabs over other nations is affirmed in rigorously authenticated hadiths of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and give him peace; related by Bukhari and Muslim in their “Sahih” in the beginning of the chapter of merits, # 5897, on the authority of Wathilah ibn al-Asqa` who said, “I heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, say, ‘Verily Allah has chosen Kinanah from the son of Isma`il, and He has chosen Quraysh from among Kinanah and He has chosen Hashim from among Quraysh and He has chosen me from the Bani Hashim.'” Continue Reading →

Failed PM To Sign Us Up With The OIC.

Media Release from the Q Society:

Australians to be healed from ‘Islamophobia’ by head of global Islamic organisation
Sunday, February 12, 2012 – Q Society of Australia Inc.

This week Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd has invited Professor Ekmelledin Ihsanoglu[sic], the Secretary General of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), to discuss “Transition and Change: The OIC and the Islamic World”

Events take place on February 15th and 16th at the National Press Club of Australia and at Griffith University, Brisbane. Following similar events in Europe and Washington, Mr Rudd’s visitor is here to educate and help us overcome “Islamophobia” in Australia.

The OIC, which represents 56 Islamic states, makes up the largest voting bloc of the UN.

United in their effort to limit critical discussion of the Islamic religion and sharia law, these countries refuse to sign the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. OIC members construed the ‘Cairo Declaration’, in which human rights are subject to interpretation by Islamic clergy and sharia law. The OIC is headquartered in Saudi Arabia, a feudal monarchy renown for violation of basic human rights under strict sharia law.

The feigned concern of the OIC with discrimination against Islam and more notably views not supportive of Islam is in contrast to the violent intolerance experienced by non-Muslim minorities in many Islamic countries. Indigenous religious minorities, which are not afforded the same respect, recognition or equality demanded by the OIC for Muslim immigrants in the West.

Author and human rights activist Ayan Hirsi Ali ‘s recent article ‘The Global War on Christians in the Muslim World’ highlights “… an unrecognised battle costing thousands of lives.” With these facts in mind, there are serious questions democratic governments should be asking the OIC, before taking advice from Professor Ihsanoglu.

Q Society appeals to Mr Rudd to show courage and openly address this discrepancy and the discrimination against non-Muslims, evident in almost every OIC country.

Vilifying critics of Islam and sharia practices as ‘islamophobic’ is in fact aiding and abetting those who seek to silence the debate about the rise of Islamic sharia, both in the West and in the once secular countries of the OIC.

Kevin Rudd, our erstwhile Prime Minister and current Foreign Minister, has a bit of a reputation as a grandstander. The current view is that he’s bucking for a seat with the UN (Security Council, no less – even temporary is good to this fellow), and a part of his sleazing towards that goal is sucking up to the OIC.

He’s given a lot of money to help the less fortunate in countries other than Oz, which you’d expect as Foreign Minister. But…

Continue Reading →


“Israel’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Danny Ayalon explains the historical facts relating to the issue of refugees in the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The video explains the reason there are still refugees after more than six decades is because of Arab leaders’ recalcitrance to accept their brethren and the United Nations which created a separate agency with unique principles and criteria. The video also highlights the issue of the Jewish refugees who were forced out of their homes in the Arab world, and were subsequently absorbed by the State of Israel.”

NOTE: Brian of London spots the following:

At 1:15 Danny says: “Over 850,000 Jews, from ancient Jewish communities predating Islam and the Arab occupation of the Middle East, were forced out of their homes”

This is, of course, completely true and completely at odds with all Islamic teaching. I’d say this is the strongest and most negative thing about Islam I’ve ever heard any official of the Israeli Government say. But you do have to know something about Islam to understand why.

He’s telling us two absolutely correct things that are completely and utterly denied, refuted and considered blasphemy by all significant schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

  1. Islam, carried by Arabs, conquered and occupied the previously non-Muslim and non-Arab middle east.
  2. Judaism’s claim on Israel is the strongest national claim still left in the whole of the middle east because Islam has erradicated by the force of its occupation, almost every other pre-Islamic national identity. Just try to visit independent Kurdistan or the national home of the Copts.

Witnessing History.

I get asked why I blog, why I talk to people and why I continually wade through the muck of modern decay.

I get asked why I put up with being called all sorts of names. After all, it can’t be pleasant, and it’s far from a delightful way to spend the day.

Why not let someone else make waves (not that I do much wavemaking – more like the occaional miniscule ripple).
Continue Reading →


General feeling is that they’ll get it from Zero.

Mutual respect? How can a genocidal fundamustard outfit that underlines its self significance with the hatred of the non-Muslim, have respect for what they believe is an infidel nation supporting their enemy Israel? Anyone see any logic in that? KGS

Muslim Brotherhood Spokesman: We Are Willing to Dialogue with US

In response to statements by State Secretary Hillary Clinton about an American intention to dialogue with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB), the movement’s spokesman, Mahmoud Ghazlan, said that the MB was willing to engage in dialogue as long as it is based on mutual respect. He said that so far no dialogue has taken place, except for some contacts between officials at the US embassy in Cairo and former parliament members from the MB. Dr. ‘Issam Al-‘Arian, deputy-chairman of the MB political party, said that several US congress members visited the party headquarters last week.


New Mosque? Time To Lawyer Up.

In my line of work, such as it is, I meet a lot of people from around the world. One of these is Mr. Gavin Boby, a lawyer who specialises in building applications.

If you want to build something or don’t like the idea of a potential development, then he’d be one of the people you want to talk with. He knows the by-laws, the regulations, and how to deal with the authorities.

That’s what he does.

What makes him a bit different is that he’s now set up a foundation to offer his services pro bono (that’s FREE for those of us who didn’t go onto tertiary education) to help people campaign against the ever-increasing proliferation of mosques.
Continue Reading →

Madagascar flies home maids abused in Lebanon


ANTANANARIVO (AFP) – Madagascar’s government early Thursday flew home 86 women domestic workers from Lebanon who had been subjected to abuse, amid concerns over the deaths of 17 Madagascan maids in the past year.

Most of the women “had run away from their employers,” said Population Minister Nadine Ramaroson as she welcomed them at Antananarivo airport.

“Their return home was negotiated by the Madagascan consul in Lebanon after either the women themselves or their families asked for them to be repatriated,” Ramaroson said.

The government decided to charter a plane after numerous cases of abuse were reported. The Population Ministry received more than 600 repatriation requests from maids or their families.

The Union of Qualified Domestic Workers (SPDTS), an non-governmental organisation that helps the victims and their families, says that in the past year alone 17 Madagascan maids in Lebanon died from abuse suffered at the hands of their employers.

“There have been a lot of deaths,” Prime Minister Camille Vital said. “That’s why the government has decided to repatriate those who wanted to come home. The government is paying for this rapatriation.”

On their arrival at the airport the young women were met by social workers from SPDTS and by staff from different ministries tasked with providing medical care and counselling.

“My boss used to hit me and didn’t give me my salary. I’m very, very happy to be back home,” said 25-year-old Leonie.

Another woman who gave her name as Augustine said: “The friend with whom I ran away from my boss wasn’t able to get on the plane at the last minute. I’m really worried about her. She’s not in good shape.”

More than 7,000 Madagascans work in Lebanon, according to SPDTS. In 2010 around 500 of them came home before the end of their contract.

“The Horror, the Horror” – What an Arab Peace Looks Like in Israel

From the New English Review

IDF troops in Itamar in Samaria

Our thanks to Lori Lowenthal Marcus, President of Z Street for this report.

The mainstream media is entranced with the prospect of democracy occurring in the current round of daily stories about protests against autocracy in the Arab Middle East.  We noted what US Rep. Joseph Pitts  (R-PA) said  in remarks before the House of Representatives  about the attacks on the minority Copts in Egypt, with Church burnings, abductions, rapes of Christian women and slaughter by Jihadi Muslims:  “Democracy without Protection of Minority Rights is Mobocracy”. In the Arab Muslim Middle East it means freedom to commit Jihad against non-Muslim neighbors.

The latest graphic evidence of that came on Friday night in the Israel settlement of Itamar in Samaria, not far from Nablus.  Friday night, an Arab stealthily entered the home of a Jewish family and murdered in cold blood all five members:  mother, father and three small children. Read this report: ‘West Bank Settler Family Murdered in their Beds”

Watch this Reuters Report and note the comments by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu about Palestinian duplicity: talking peace in English and incitement to murder in Arabic conveyed in Mosques, Schools and in state controlled media.

This was patent Jihad against innocent Jews. It is the latest example of what an Arab Muslim ‘peace’ would look like, if Jewish settlements in Samaria and Judea were included in any proposed peace agreement between Israel and what passes for the Palestinian Authority in the disputed territories.  What is the Arabic expression: “first the Saturday people, then the Sunday people”. This is the latest example of Arab Muslim savagery directed towards unbelievers who dare to return to live in realms that Allah had bequeathed after the early waves of Jihad.    Think of the Jihad perpetrated against Jews and Christians in Middle East modern history:  the slaughter of Jews in Hevron in 1929; the Farhud-Nazi Arab massacre of   Iraqi Jews in  1941;  the pogroms against Libyan and Egyptian Jews in 1945; Christian Maronites in the Lebanese civil war of the 1970’s,  Assyrian Chaldeans in ‘liberated Iraq’ and  the Copts in Egypt in 2011. And now this in Samaria.

This may be too graphic, but here are pictures of the victims slaughtered in this Jihad in Itamar and Marcus’ report:

For the rest of this excellent article please click over to the NER