A federal labour board has ruled that Employment Insurance’s call-centre management acted properly when it fired a probationary agent whose on-the-job tirade questioned Black Lives Matter protests and asked coworkers, “When will there be a day to remember white people?”

Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board adjudicator Christopher Rootham said the remarks showed the worker “unsuitable to serve in a diverse public-service workplace committed to equity and respect.”

Although the discussion had no link to her duties, Rootham wrote that behaviour during working hours is part of a probationary review and that dismissal was a “good-faith response.”

The six-month employee launched into her commentary on what a colleague described as a “slow day for calls,” criticising 2020 demonstrations where then-prime minister Justin Trudeau knelt with marchers.

Witnesses recalled her saying Black Lives Matter protesters wanted to erase history by scrapping brands like Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben and insisting that “it’s not like Hitler was walking around killing people.”

Affidavits also recounted her claims that Covid-19 threats were exaggerated, that masks were unnecessary and that media coverage of suspected graves at an indian residential school in Kamloops, B.C., was overblown because the events “happened years ago.”

I guess the joke was on her. There were no graves at all.

3. This is Germany, but its clearly in concert with Canada:

I think we can guess which politicians it is criminal to insult. The current German govt actually PAYS ANTIFA to attack, insult, lie about and otherwise frame AfD supporters as they attempt to make the party itself illegal.

4. Top constitutional lawyer slams Indigenous land acknowledgements as virtue signaling

Indigenous land acknowledgments have increased in Canada since unproven claims that unmarked graves were discovered at former residential schools gained media attention.

(LifeSiteNews) – One of Canada’s top constitutional lawyers gave a blunt assessment regarding his views of so-called Indigenous “land acknowledgements” that have become commonplace in all forms of Canadian society, saying they are nothing more than “hypocritical virtue signaling.”

“Aboriginal land acknowledgements are hypocritical virtue signaling by people who would never ever give away their own home for free to an Aboriginal,” Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) president John Carpay said in a recent video message.

“They like to pretend the land was stolen, but they themselves are not going to give up their own home or land and give that back to an Aboriginal.”

Carpay noted that in his view, if the land is “stolen,” then to “give it back.”

“If you’re not willing to give it back, don’t describe it as stolen land acknowledgements do nothing to help Aboriginals on reserves who are facing poverty and unemployment and high rates of suicide, drug addiction, often very corrupt local governments,” he reasoned.

Indigenous land acknowledgments have become common in Canada and have increased since the unproven claims that unmarked graves have been discovered at former residential schools gained media attention. Indeed, so prevalent that even King Charles III gave one recently while delivering the Throne Speech on behalf of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government.

John Carpay and his law firm, are at this point the last hope for rule of law, and actual constitutional rights in Canada. But he is wrong in a key aspect of his assertion. In fact, Land Claims are FAR MORE than mere virtue signalling. They are the dialectic narrative attack on Canadians to ensure they feel they have no grounds with which to object to the deracination of their culture, laws, beliefs, reproductive taboos or any other aspect of their identity whatsoever as it is destroyed in part by mass immigration.