The CBC does what it always does and protects Islam as much as possible, and arguably endangering the safety of all Canadians by attempting to deceive us all of the threat of that culture and value set.
Nacime Kouddar was charged Sunday by telephone with armed assault with a vehicle, aggravated assault and hit and run for hitting a 25-year-old security guard in the parking lot of the Walmart in Sherbrooke.
• Also read: Accused of hitting a security guard
At the end of the day Saturday, the security guard and father of five, Philippe Jean, refused to let Kouddar and the woman who accompanied him both enter Walmart. The store rule states that only one person per vehicle is allowed to enter the business due to the pandemic.
Then, the couple and the security guard exchanged a few words right in the middle of the parking lot.
“At a certain point, the frustrated customer drove directly with his vehicle to the employee, even dragging him over the hood for several meters,” said Sherbrooke police.
Severely wounded in the head, Mr. Jean victim is said to be still in critical condition.
Sherbrooke police director Danny McConnell launched a “call for calm” on Sunday with his fellow citizens affected by the COVID-19 crisis.
A crowdfunding campaign was launched to help the father of five children. To date, it has raised $ 43,545.
Please remember, both of these reports where available at the same time.
The CBC had access to the exact same information as did the Journal de Montreal. They chose not to name the attacker because they do not want Canadians to form opinions that are true and which may threaten the policies of the far left Trudeau government and the stratospheric management at the CBC.
This is why BBC and CBC MUST be privatley funded. If they want to hawk a utopian communist agenda and destroy classical Canada while they are at it, let them find private sponsors to do it. Don’t make Canadians pay for it.
At least in the UK, the BBC licence fee is separate from taxes and they can refuse to pay it and suffer the consequences. What an enviable position they are in compared to Canada. There is nothing we can do but suffocate in the smug and the sanctimony of the CBC.
Thank you Sassy for the translation of the French video.
Watch Swedish media torture themselves and language itself to avoid saying the central fact of this story. That migrants, probably Muslim ones, humiliated this native Swede because they hate him because he is a native Swede. The clue is that, and somehow this got past the censors, the migrants called him a “fuc**ng Sven”.
A few days ago, we published an article on the mysterious graffiti defacement of a monument at a Toronto area school, dedicated to the victims of an Islamic jihadi who slaughtered many women because he felt women should not get an education. We noted that it was the first time that something like this has happened but there is no photo of the damage done.
This of course is leading us into a full fledged communist-Islamic state where no one can know anything true that leads them to a conclusion that evidences a reality other than a state imposed one.
Today we know why:
Four men aged 18 to 20 have been charged with mischief after a plaque dedicated to the 14 women murdered in the 1989 Ecole Polytechnique massacre was defaced with slurs inside a Scarborough school.
A plaque was in place at the Scarborough Centre for Alternative Studies on Midland Avenue when sometime on Dec. 3, four male suspects defaced it reportedly with slurs.
Four days later, police arrested three men and charged them each with one count of mischief under $5,000.
They were identified as Ahmed Sido, 20, Muhammed Nanaa, 19 and Abdullah Al-Mosuli, 21.
On Dec. 8, a fourth suspect identified as Adnan Al Noumayri, 18, was arrested and charged with mischief.
The article ends with a narrative lie though, saying that the Ecole Polytechnique massacre was done by “an avowed misogynist”.
The facts speak for themselves.
PC sent in this oddly related link:
Three homophobic thugs who lured gay men onto dates using Grindr then beat and robbed them have been jailed for more than 10 years each after one of the victim’s blood was found on a coat.
Mohammed Sohail Khan, Qaasim Ahmad and Muhammad Umar, all 18, set up fake profiles on the app and posed as gay men wanting a date.
Between January and March this year the trio tricked four men into meeting them in Bordesley Green, Birmingham.
When the victims turned up for their dates the men were then forced onto wasteland where they were attacked and robbed.
The thugs also humiliated their victims by spitting on them and shouting homophobic comments at them while one had a screwdriver held up against his eyeball.
The first attack happened on January 5 and three further reports of attacks were made on March 18, 24 and 29, sparking a major police manhunt.
Both of these ‘reports’ are classic examples of the old saying, “A half truth is the damnedest of lies”. And to be clear, it is because a Half truth is the most effective of lies. Admitting it was men with muslim names who did these acts, was a cover for explaining that both these acts had islamic MOTIVES. And this is something that our socialist government-media complex will never allow us to understand, as Islam is still the greatest vector of attack against what was a fairly peaceful, tolerant and successful society.
One of the first distinctly Islamic terrorist attacks, or perhaps in this case one could say, acts of Islamic Jihad that took place in North America and predated 911 by so much that few even now know it was an act of jihad, was the mass murder of women at a Montreal engineering school by a man with an Algerian father who felt that women should not get an education.
His name was Gamil Rodrigue Liass Gharbi, and the attack was December 6, 1989.
Lépine had long complained about women working in “non-traditional” jobs. After several months of planning, including the purchase of a semi-automatic rifle, he entered the École Polytechnique on the afternoon of December 6, 1989, separated the men from the women in a classroom, and shot the women, claiming that he was “fighting feminism“. He then moved into other parts of the building, targeting only the women, before killing himself. His suicide note blamed feminists for ruining his life.
It should be noted that Algeria, where his father is from, uses the Maliki form of Islamic jurisprudence, the same system that ruled Spain for centuries and was stunningly harsh.
Here is an article by feminist author, Phyllis Chesler on Garbi which makes the connection to his cultural heritage. But what Ms. Chesler doesn’t mention is that the Lepine massacre was used as an excuse to start a massive misanthropist movement throughout Canada. They decided to blame his Y chromosome rather than his Islamic cultural heritage and march annually against male violence. This was also an example of early repressive tolerance, as the inscription on the monument in Ottawa, Vancouver and elsewhere was in direct violation of Canada’s hate-literature law act for vilifying an identifiable group, but no one would do anything about that at all.
(The inscription has since been changed quietly to remove the phrase “male violence” at the end, if memory serves.)
A few days before the 30th anniversary of the attack at Ecole Polytechnique this year, on December 3, 2019, a memorial to the victims of the attack was defaced with insulting terms for women, in Arabic.
“At the beginning of this week, a temporary message board was set up in the lobby of the Scarborough Centre for Alternative Studies as part of a display to mark the 30th anniversary of the Ecole Polytechnique tragedy,” Toronto District School Board spokesman Ryan Bird explained Friday.
“After school ended on Tuesday, staff were alerted to misogynistic messages that had been written on the board,” he said. “This kind of language is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated at any TDSB school.”
Police confirmed the troubling incident was reported Wednesday by the principal from SCAS — a school on Midland Ave., south of Eglinton Ave. E., offering educational opportunities and programs to students over 18.
“A group of males were allegedly seen writing on the remembrance sign,” Const. Victor Kwong said. “Officers went to the school and saw there were words written in Arabic and in English.”
The English words included “b——” and “f—,” he said.
Four suspects have been identified but as of Friday no charges had been laid.
Videos or photos of the vandalism will be added if found.
One may speculate though, that white male misogynist, non-muslim women-haters of Canadian background would not make their inscriptions in Arabic.
Also noteworthy, when searching for images of the defaced memorial, there are no photos or videos, but lots and lots for leftist defaced statues of Sir John A. Macdonald.
UPDATE: Johnny U. Left this Mark Steyn link on the subject in the comments. As usual, Mr. Steyn does a rather splendid job of explaining how Canada weaponized the jihad attack against all men in Canada.
In true, Canadian-Soviet style, there is no word of radicalization of what exactly. But we do know from an earlier report that these two muslims with a house full of explosives on the cusp of radicalization, are not a national security matter. Said by the same guy who scrubbed all mention of Islam in any form from the National Security brief.
From May 14:
Muslim father and son charged with possessing explosive devices and local police tipped off by US border services, but Public Safety Minister, Ralph Goodale, the same deceptive ‘Grima Wormtongue’, who scrubbed the terror report of any and all references to any form of Islam, says its not a national security issue.
On the day of the MUSLIM attacks on Sri Lankan Christians and tourists, I reported at this site that I was getting phone calls from friends, concerned that all the reporting they heard on the news that day, CNN, CBC, BBC and everywhere else, did everything it could to make sure people did not consider muslims as the possible killers. In fact they slandered Buddhists and often even managed to make the Christians the bad guys for alleged previous actions that brought retaliation from Hindu groups or Buddhists.
This is some early Dutch language reporting from that day, not sure yet if its Belgian or The Netherlands, but forcing that same insane narrative:
Thank you C. for your find and translation on this.
H/T Johnny U.
“The half truth is the damnedest of lies”. Defund the CBC
Seems like an appropriate place to repost my interview with Ingrid Carlqvist, who’s view-count Youtube is no doubt suppressing.
PLEASE SEE UPDATE AT BOTTOM:
In this Daily Mail report of a brutal and sadistic rape in Madrid, we learn that photos and video are available, that the arrested is in custody and that the victim could describe her assailant in great detail. Yet all we hear of the attacker is that it was a “man”.
A men’s rights group should really sue and as I write this, it becomes less and a less tongue in cheek suggestion with each passing word. Why does the left get away with playing the ‘shifting level of abstraction’ game?
Why is it OK to blame, for example, muslim crimes motivated by Islamic teaching and culture on “Asians” or “youths” or in the case of CBC reporting on Rotherham mass rape and forced sex slavery of over a thousand children, “men”?
(I cannot find the article now, but about a year after the Rotherham rape gangs hit the news in a big way, the CBC finally covered it describing the mostly Pakistani, all muslim sex slave gangsters of children, as “groups of men”.)
This is just shifting the level of abstraction to one which lays fault where cultural_marxism wants it, and away from where it actually belongs, which is more often that numbers should allow, muslims.
A sort of amortization of guilt if you like, spreading it from many muslims, who do these things as a matter of religious, cultural and historical norms, to all men with the added bonus of making men as a group look bad. The one identifiable group that oddly, the group slander laws seem not to cover.
Meanwhile, and as a direct result, this keeps happening:
Because how are women, children or men supposed to make informed choices for their own safety when all information is calculatedly and pointedly untrue? A lie of omission is still a lie.
The leftist government media complex is making an omelette. It is an omelette of social paradise and the eggs are all the decapitated, raped, groped, beaten and robbed women who made the sanctimonious choice for lack of testable information. And we know how many eggs the last century’s communist tyrants broke to make this omelette, one which never actually came out of the pan, just by the way.
Over one-hundred-million of them.
And that, was their own people, and in peacetime.
Three hours after I published this little opinion piece, I saw this in a related msg to me:
Four days. That was the time it took the National Police to capture the man who raped and brutally assaulted the American student Andrea Sicignano next to the Aluche interchange. There, on the morning of December 9, a man of 35 years and Spanish nationality (although of Algerian origin, data that is being hidden by the media) assaulted the girl after getting off at the same stop of the night bus in which both traveled. As soon as the facts were known, the agents launched an investigation that culminated in his arrest on the 12th in Carabanchel. The attacker had up to nine records, although none of a sexual nature.
This is a grab of text from a google translation. But I think we can all agree that “Of Algerian origin” is pretty unambiguous.
Media withholding information that would assist the public in a democratic state to help shape their own national policy is a crime, and more than that, it is fascism.
Whatever the people choose to do in defence of their right to be properly informed would be more than just in this author’s opinion.
Probably one of the best examples of the week of why there must not be a state owned media in any nation that wants to call itself free or democratic.
Here is the Sputnik article that inspired this interview.
The most important thing of course, is that you do not name the threat in case people decide that maybe that threat is problematic.
You can watch it here, but its way more fun to watch it on Youtube so you can read the running commentary on it till CBC takes it down.
German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, who I maintain is a Nazi by proxy, meaning that she intends to obliterate the Jewish people in Germany and Europe by importing people who will do it rather than don the uniform herself and have the honesty of her convictions, has provided another data point for this theory.
So in order to not be seen as ‘racist against islam’, she, like the British press who refer to horrific crimes motivated by Islam as being of “Asian” origin rather than Muslim, has decided to be actually racist and say it is an “Arab” thing and not mention the roots of it, which is of course, koran and islam.
“The fact that no nursery, no school, no synagogue can be left without police protection dismays us,’ [Merkel] said.”
Perhaps Ms. Merkel can create some kind of secure camp for Jews to live in. For their own protection. Somewhere they have lots of work related activities for example.
For those who missed it, the interview or at least this segment of it stems from a video taken by an Israeli Arab, where he was attacked by what is said to be a Syrian muslim refugee in Berlin. We put that video on Youtube first, but Youtube took it down and gave us a community guidelines strike and then took away upload ability for 2 weeks while everyone else and their pet hamster has the exact same video on their own channels.
You can see it below:
Berlin – on Wednesday, a loudly yelling Afghan ran towards Angela Merkel, as she was leaving the Reichstag, and was wrestled down by two security guards. It was caught on camera, and aired live, more or less accidentally.
Please have a look at the two following videos and compare.
The first one aired LIVE, so the interviewer and his guest keep on talking, as they have no idea what is going on. The sound is un-edited and you can hear the yelling very clearly.
Then please watch the second clip, produced by Bild newspaper afterwards, and compare the sound of the two.
1. The clip that aired live, relevant part beginning at 7 seconds in:
2. Bild’s edited clip. Please pay attention to the sound:
Die Welt reassure us that the “disturber was merely running towards Merkel”, no harm intended, and that there is no reason for a “knee jerk reaction”, just because someone runs toward you, yelling “something in a foreign language” that “sounds similar to Allahu akbar”.
We are translating it for the humor:
“Heart stopping moment in front of the Bundestag: On Wednesday, an Afghan ran towards the chancellor, yelling something – then, a bodyguard stopped him. WELT learned from police insiders what they know about the man and how they assess the incident.
(…) He is an Afghan, 23 years old. But he does not live in Berlin. He is from Swabian Ostfildern, southeast of Stuttgart. And he has no police record so far.
His motive does not seem to have been hostile. He simply ran towards the world-famous chancellor. Upon doing so, he was stopped by a bodyguard, whose job it simply is to prevent such incidents. And he did not yell anything political – no slogans, and definitely no suicide attack slogans.
So the case is treated by regular police, not by state security.”
One is reminded of the famous advice that a German criminal psychologist gave, after the axe attack on board a Würzburg train:
“It is understandable that you feel threatened when someone with an axe enters the train. But we mustn’t become paranoid. It helps to go there and politely ask what it’s all about.”