Category Archives: forcing sharia
More Islam taught at Islamic schools in the UK
Once again, the hunt is on for that ever elusive, moderate Islam.
Thank you Don’t bend over
More on the Quebec Niqkab woman.
Turns out CTV and CBC not surprisingly have sanitized this story quite a bit, omitting more onerous demands that men not face her etc. in the class. This women clearly went in with the intention of agitating and eventually going to the HRC. The plain fact is, this was tactical. The women never intended to go there to learn French, but to teach sharia for control and profit. Another thing that really annoys me about the Canadian attitude. In the CTV video below, you see some professional Canadian from some Multi-Culti board or another use the usual platitudes of compromise and balance. Utterly emetic.. To these spoiled civil servants, when a Muslim demands that all Jews in Canada be dead, they believe that it would be a satisfying decision just to make them all really really sick.
Thanks to our reader Kaffir_Kanuc for finding this Gazzette article:
An unidentifed woman wears a niqab. A judge’s decision not to allow a woman to wear the Muslim head covering has sparked a legal and religious debate.
Photograph by: Phil Noble/Reuters, np
Quebec Immigration Minister Yolande James authorized the expulsion of a Muslim woman from a government-sponsored French class at Cégep St. Laurent, a report said Tuesday.
The student, an Egyptian who is a permanent resident of Canada and who wears a veil over her face known as a niqab, apparently refused to reveal her face in class and insisted male students not face her, according to La Presse.
The Cégep tried various ways to accommodate the woman between February and November 2009. But the situation became tense and created problems at the school.
Roger Giroux, the director of francization with the Quebec Department of Immigration, made several requests to the woman for her to remove the veil at the risk of being expelled. She refused and insisted that Giroux’s ultimatum be confirmed in writing. Giroux informed the woman in a letter that she was indeed required to remove her niqab in order to participate in the class, since part of the objective of the class is to encourage interaction with other students.
The woman was informed, however, that she could take the same class on the Internet.
The woman has since then apparently complained to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which will study the complaint in the coming months, La Presse said.
The woman initially agreed to remove her niqab when meeting with a female student advisor and when posing for her school ID card. She also agreed to receive some instruction without the niqab from a female teacher in an isolated area of the school.
The school’s accommodations extended to allowing the woman to give an oral presentation at the far end of the classroom facing away from other students. It became difficult to provide the woman with the instuction that is part of the curriculum, the La Presse report explained, because it involves teaching proper elocution and seeing how a person pronounces words in French.
The report notes that although there are regular requests for special accommodations in French classes for cultural reasons – some of which are deemed acceptable and some not – the cases rarely lead to expulsion. This was the only student expelled because of that among 39,000 students last year.
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Niqab+dispute+sparks+debate+over+right+veil/2633767/Student+expelled+wearing+niqab+report/2631626/story.html#ixzz0hCpQ0Bgu
Below, please find a nicely sanitized version from CTV news:
Same tactic tried in England:
interesting analysis:
thank you don’t bend over for allah
Canada: Muslim lauches complaint against Quebec school for non-compliance to sharia
From the CBC
Niqab-wearing woman pursues Quebec college
The niqab is a style of headwear that covers the whole body, leaving only the eyes exposed. (CBC)
Quebec’s Human Rights Commission is studying a complaint from a permanent resident expelled from a French college class last year after she refused to remove her niqab veil.
The Egyptian woman was enrolled in a language class for new immigrants at the CÉGEP St-Laurent in northwest Montreal when she was asked to remove the religious clothing.
She claims school officials violated her freedom of religion by requesting she not wear her modest dress, which covers the entire face and body and leaves only the eyes exposed.
The school says it tried to accommodate her on several occasions. Officials say she was not wearing her niqab veil when she applied for the program, nor when she met with school representatives for the first time prior to the 10-month course.
But when she showed up for class, she was wearing a niqab because of the presence of male students.
The school said the teacher allowed her to do her oral tests alone in a separate room, and present her assignments with her back turned to the class.
The teacher told her it was important when learning a new language to be able to see others’ faces.
The woman’s demands created tension in the class, school officials said.
“For the teacher it was more difficult to hear her, and it was more difficult for all the people to understand what she has to say,” said the school’s director, Paul-Émile Bourque.
But one Montrealer who wears a niqab said she doesn’t understand how it could be a problem in the classroom.
“I went through four years of university in engineering and I graduated with distinction,” said Afifa Naz. “It didn’t affect my grades. I participated in projects with my group and really I had no problems.”
But the government is sticking by its guns.
A spokesman for the province’s immigration minister says the woman could have stayed in the French class had she agreed to remove her niqab for certain exercises.
She claims school officials violated her freedom of religion by requesting she not wear her modest dress, which covers the entire face and body and leaves only the eyes exposed.
The school says it tried to accommodate her on several occasions. Officials say she was not wearing her niqab veil when she applied for the program, nor when she met with school representatives for the first time prior to the 10-month course.
But when she showed up for class, she was wearing a niqab because of the presence of male students.
The school said the teacher allowed her to do her oral tests alone in a separate room, and present her assignments with her back turned to the class.
The teacher told her it was important when learning a new language to be able to see others’ faces.
The woman’s demands created tension in the class, school officials said.
“For the teacher it was more difficult to hear her, and it was more difficult for all the people to understand what she has to say,” said the school’s director, Paul-Émile Bourque.
But one Montrealer who wears a niqab said she doesn’t understand how it could be a problem in the classroom.
“I went through four years of university in engineering and I graduated with distinction,” said Afifa Naz. “It didn’t affect my grades. I participated in projects with my group and really I had no problems.”
But the government is sticking by its guns.
A spokesman for the province’s immigration minister says the woman could have stayed in the French class had she agreed to remove her niqab for certain exercises.
Dispatches: Britain’s Islamic Republic
The rest will be posted soon. Here is part 1. which is worse, the Muslims or the British government face for them, making preposterous claims about Islam.
STOPshariaLAWnow posts this video:
It is refreshing to see a woman actually fighting back against the horror of Islam. Modern feminism seems to be in league with Islam as modern feminism is more concerned with being in alignment with anti-West and anti-capitalism than they are with actual women’s rights as human beings. My only criticism of this video, is that while STOPshariaLAWnow is 100% correct that the ‘small stick’ or the ‘beat them lightly’ is not a mitigating factor in any way whatsoever, and in fact it is obscene to even sugest it is, Robert Spencer’s book on Koran exposes how actually only in the English translations of Koran and other Muslim holy books, are those preposterous excuses used, and not in the original, placed there to anaesthetize western peoples to the true depth of horror and depravity which is Islam.
Infidel cyclist run over by a holy car of Riyadh
Vlad has to a small degree, focused on how Islam is antipathetic to the arts and music and musicians in particular. There are many reasons for this not the least of which is that artists tend to be the most sanctimonious of the leftists, not to mention strident advocates of multiculturalism. The other is that supporters and producers of the arts need to know, that other cultures, specifically Islam, do not see the arts as Americans do.
Celebrity culture is uniquely an American experience even if it has been exported to many western nations. Rome for example, loved and admired the arts but felt Artists overall, were considerably lower in status than people in the trades. I tend to agree with the Romans.
In any case, now cyclists have been targeted in Saudi not so much because they are cyclists, but because they are infidels. The trial, if there is one, and the sentence, if there is one, will be very revealing as to how sharia law will view this, if indeed it is a crime at all.
The bigger point is, that in a world with increasingly higher numbers of Muslims being brought into western nations, nations which have a profound culture of their own but are in denial of it, we will start to see the following.
Our culture, which allows for people to make themselves very vulnerable to strangers from time to time, will begin to change those behaviours. That we will have to start to examine our food and where it is from more. To not use bicycles trivially for exercise and sport where we may be vulnerable to strangers in cars.
‘Situational awareness’ will become something people learning more and more circumstances and not just something taught to spies and security personnel. We already see this in aviation to a very large degree. Aviation is merely the first area where western civilization has grudgingly changed its sense of security to accommodate the multi cultural fantasy. But it will not be the last.
Our refusal to accept the fact that we are indeed at war with Islam, as we have been historically more often than not, means we will have to come up with more and more creative reasons why we are losing and why its somehow OK, or more likely, our own fault. Civilization has already thrown Israel and by extension Jewish people, under the bus. Israel’s foreign policy has aggravated the peaceful Muslims and made victims of the ‘Palestinians’ and they deserve what they get or some other rationalization.
There is also of course, massive denial of the facts on the ground for Jewish people world wide and especially in universities. Have a look at this stunning case of selective enforcement at York U. This is a very serious matter. This means that York has allowed the most vicious and hostile people to western ideas, the very ideas a university is supposed to perpetuate, to set the agenda, and the parameters of who may and may not speak, and what ideas may or may not be presented to the student body.
Granted this example of the cyclist was in Saudi Arabia but this is about stages. With larger numbers of Muslims, you get a larger demand for more and more strict applications of sharia law. Already at Carleton U. in Canada, the main bar, Roosters Pub, which was rumoured to be one of the largest beer outlets in North America, was forced to go booze free to accommodate Muslim ‘students’* who felt they had a right to be in there without being offended by the presence of infidels drinking.
Much more disturbingly, the facts, which at the time where printed in local newspapers etc. where hushed up and its very difficult to find evdience of this now. This by the way, was in the 1990s or earlier. I went in and interviewed staff members myself who refused to speak on the matter or denied knowing anything about why a massively profitable institution became dry.
It will be well worth watching the trial of those arrested for deliberately running over foreign workers in the KSA who were cycling. It is the future of our own nations. First in the behaviour, the attacking of the vulnerable in any way possible in order to destroy our trust based culture, and then in the judicial process that follows. All this I guarantee until and unless we admit in the west, that we are indeed at war, with Islam.
Eeyore for Vladtepesblog.
Col Allen West speaks in Washington D.C. Feb 19 2010 from Vlad Tepes on Vimeo.
*I put ‘students’ in single quotes because people who are there to learn seldom demand that everything at the institution of education change to conform to what the ‘student’ already knows.
How sexy; Politiken on it’s knees for Islam.
After a settlement to the Saudis, Middle Eastern and Australian Muslim groups, Politiken took a swipe at freedom in favour of sharia. “We apologize to anyone who was offended by our decision to reprint the cartoon drawing”. Although the paper stands by it’s decision to print what it wants, they are sorry for any hurt feelings. Islamist groups are thrilled and predictably the Oh I See welcomes the apology.
We should understand that pictures of Muhammed complimentary or not, were and still are, quite common and have not been met with very much if any incident, outside of the Jyllands-Posten episode. We also have to understand that within Islamic theology, the Quran can abrogate itself to suit it’s selected political purpose of the day. For a thorough understanding of such abrogation in Islam see here (second video) and here. Think of it as an ‘in the heat of the moment’ or the ‘here and now’ doctrine, Muslim scripture in the ‘fast lane’. What better way to charge ahead against the ‘enemies of Islam’ than to conveniently abrogate the Quran to suit the present, chosen circumstance? Foolproof, I’d say.
” None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Sura 2. The Cow-Verse 106.

The picture above is an illustration of Muhammed. Greek, 19th century. It is currently housed in the Benaki Museum in Athens. What would the Imams say? Or what of this one below, used as an illustration advertising soup stock powder? Would it be permitted as long as the soup were made without pork?

1928 German advertisement for bouillon extract shows Gabriel guiding Mohammed up to Allah.
There are thousands of depictions of Muhammed old and new, created by artists around the world including ones created in Muslim nations. The claim that he cannot be depicted in picture form is clearly false.
From The Telegraph U.K.
Danish newspaper apologises over Prophet Mohammed cartoon
A Danish newspaper on Friday became the first in the country to apologise for offending Muslims by printing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with a bomb-shaped turban, rekindling a heated debate about free speech.
Published: 5:38PM GMT 26 Feb 2010
Politiken said its apology was part of a settlement with a Saudi lawyer representing eight Muslim groups in the Middle East and Australia.
The daily drew strong criticism from Danish media, which previously had stood united in rejecting calls to apologise for 12 cartoons that sparked fierce protests in the Muslim world four years ago. Continue Reading →
Dutch Labour party has some counting to do.
It would appear that some Islamic schools in Holland are using their multicultural right to educate children the old fashioned way. With a cane. Crosscream, One of Hollands national treasures, has translated this article from the Dutch press:
Parents report improper conduct
Getting beaten during quran school
By Eric de Brouwer and Gerda Frankenhuis, freely translated by Ahcim/Cross
Rotterdam This month a young child was physically abused during Koran lessons in the city of Rotterdam. The pupil was beaten with a stick by one of the employees of an Islamic school, the man who beat the child arranges the lessons outside official school hours.
Because of the incident in Rotterdam, the previous abuses that where discovered in a mosque school in Den Hague do not seem to be an independent affliction anymore. The parliament has assigned the GGD (concerns public and mental health) to do research on physical abuse in Quranic schools in the larger cities. Though the incident is over 1.5 months old, the incident has only recently been reported. The mayor and his assistance have given report of the incident after the VVD asked questions.
One of the spokespersons of the county of Rotterdam-city said that the beating did not happen during school, but was done by someone who was not an official teacher, but hired to give the children extra quranic lessons.
”The school leadership did well reporting this incident to the GGD” said the municipal spokesperson, ”the employee in question received a reprisal”. The GGD does not believe that the school was at fault, ”because they reported the incident” says Denis Wiering, team leader youthpolicy of the GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond.
The GGD passed the information on to the AMK (child abuse) of the bureau for youthcare. Chief executive officer René Meuwissen of the bureau for youthcare said, ”we have had talks concerning the incident, but as of yet the parents do not want to press charges”, the AMK did not do research on the child home situation because of yet there have been not any reported abuses within the family. The local Rotterdam-municipality alderman of education Lamers (Christiandemocrats), told use that he has not intention of banning schools of renting space to other organisations
* Take into account not all legal, judicial or political terms are translated correctly.
“Give me segregation, or give them death!”
More primitivism from the tablecloth brigade in Saudi. I swear that somewhere in Italy there is a restaurant that has the worlds highest linen bills.
From Real Courage.org
Reuters reports: “Whoever mixes the sexes should be killed: Sheikh Barrack
Saudi cleric backs gender segregation with fatwa
A prominent Saudi cleric has issued an edict calling for opponents of the kingdom’s strict segregation of men and women to be put to death if they refuse to abandon their ideas.
Shaikh Abdul-Rahman al-Barrak said in a fatwa the mixing of genders at the workplace or in education “as advocated by modernisers” is prohibited because it allows “sight of what is forbidden, and forbidden talk between men and women.”
” Whoever allows this mixing … allows forbidden things, and whoever allows them is an infidel and this means defection from Islam … Either he retracts or he must be killed … because he disavows and does not observe the Shariah “
“All of this leads to whatever ensues,” he said in the text of the fatwa published on his website (albarrak.islamlight.net).
“Whoever allows this mixing … allows forbidden things, and whoever allows them is an infidel and this means defection from Islam … Either he retracts or he must be killed … because he disavows and does not observe the Shariah,” Barrak said.
“Anyone who accepts that his daughter, sister or wife works with men or attend mixed-gender schooling cares little about his honor and this is a type of pimping,” Barrak said.
Libya’s Gaddafi urges jihad against Switzerland
From Reuters:
Libya’s leader Muammar Gaddafi attends the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Food Security Summit in Rome November 16, 2009.
Credit: Reuters/Filippo Monteforte/Pool
BENGHAZI, Libya (Reuters) – Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi called on Thursday for a “jihad” or armed struggle against Switzerland, saying it was an infidel state that was destroying mosques.
“Any Muslim in any part of the world who works with Switzerland is an apostate, is against (the Prophet) Mohammad, God and the Koran,” Gaddafi said during a meeting in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi to mark the Prophet’s birthday.
“The masses of Muslims must go to all airports in the Islamic world and prevent any Swiss plane landing, to all harbors and prevent any Swiss ships docking, inspect all shops and markets to stop any Swiss goods being sold,” Gaddafi said.
The Swiss Foreign Ministry said it had no comment on Gaddafi’s remarks.
Libya’s relations with Switzerland broke down in 2008 when a son of Gaddafi was arrested in a Geneva hotel and charged with abusing domestic servants. Continue Reading →
R.I.P. Sweden
Thank you Lili for sending me this clip
al-Shebab fashion police crack down on wardrobe malfunctions
Get the look: Men’s fashion in Somalia never looked better. Fatigues look great paired with inexpensive tea towels and strands of bullets. Finish off the look with some stolen plastic cups, a bamboo cane, rifle and you’re set to go. For a sexy, sporty look, rub some sand around the eyes. For women, the modern look and ease of the burqa is a must-have in any well-styled wardrobe. They come in two fabulous colours, complimentary to any Muslim women’s skin tone, black and blue. Original designs provided by the House of Allah, brought to you by al-Shebab.
From The Telegraph U.K.
No splitting hairs with fundamentalist fashion police
Armed with assault rifles and scissors, the Shebab’s religious police are imposing a reign of terror – as well as crew cuts and bushy beards – on Somalia’s youth.
Published: 11:05AM GMT 23 Feb 2010
Wearing a T-shirt with a Western print, a pair of tight jeans and wavy gelled back hair, Ahmed Aydarus Abdi is a dedicated follower of fashion, but not the style advocated in the Shebab’s hardline Wahhabi brand of Islam.
“I was stopped by Shebab gunmen who asked me questions about my haircut. They said the way I designed my hair was very silly,” he said.
“Without waiting for my reply, one of the gunmen pulled out a pair of scissors and cut off huge locks on one side of my head. He was dealing with it like it was grass, not human hair,” Abdi said.
As he recounted how he reluctantly had to finish the job himself, the 19 year-old cast worried glances around him, aware that his appearance was likely to still be offensive to the canons of Shebab sartorial elegance.
His friends encouraged him to comply.
“If he had attempted to defend his right to wear his hair the way he chooses, he would have been lashed in public, so we restrained our friend,” 20-year-old Mohamoud Hassan said. Continue Reading →
England
Mayor in France feels Hala burger chain discriminates against infidels.
This is an interesting conundrum. Much like the ban on burkas, how can the government of France maintain both French values and culture and still allow freedom for people to chose how to dress and what to eat. Of course Muslims understand this and use freedom to take freedom for non Muslims away. It’s a kind of sadistic genius actually. Now a major burger joint chain is all halal. No more bacon-burgers. Does this discriminate against infidels? Well sort of if that infidel wants a bacon burger. But not in any actionable sense that they are not allowed to enter or are not treated the same as Muslims. So really, Muslims have won again, due to western governments refusal to deal with the real issue, Islam. I for one will not eat at any restaurant that does not serve pork products. That doesnt mean I always eat them, although I nearly always do, but if they do not serve them, I don’t go in. Consider a similar policy for yourselves perhaps as wallets speak louder than bombs in the long run.
Thank you Don’t Bend Over for Allah for sending me this video which he found here at the good Sheik’s place
