Category Archives: War on History

Robert Spencer dismantles Tucker Carlson and his guest, JD Hall’s ludicrous analysis of Islamic history and attacks on Israel

Posted on by — 11 Comments ↓

We were fans of Tucker’s during the communist revolution of 2020. He was the only big microphone to give a platform to counter-narrative voices such as Dr. Peter McCullough, Alex Berenson and many others who stood against the Western-World-Wide totalitarian mandates for experimental gene therapy shots. So maybe it’s a little extra painful to see him turn to the dark side since he went indie.

He has had a lot of guests that promote antisemitism in any number of ways. One was some guy who claimed that Churchill was the baddie and Hitler was just misunderstood. Can’t remember who it was, but even he said in a subsequent interview that Tucker’s introduction of him exaggerated his credentials. Another was a Jewish comedian who did a brilliantly funny routine dismantling Judaism as a belief system. But Tucker had him on as a guest for a very different reason. Having a Jewish comedian to rip on Judaism is essentially like Hamas using those fuzzy tire headed pseudo-Jews demand the end of Israel as a nation state.

In June Carlson had another ‘historian’ on who claimed the Ottoman Empire, the Islamic Caliphate treated Christians better than contemporary Israel does now.

It was so transparently an attack on Jews and Israel that hopefully it undermined its own authority. But then some people still watch CBC so it’s amazing how many digestive enzymes people can contain for the excrement of male cattle.

The article at RAIR can be seen here.

The segment of the JD Hall interview is below:

Robert Spencer’s actual history of the location and period is below:

Ignoring the subject matter altogether, this post also contains an excellent example of the contrast between a claim and an argument. JD Hall makes claims with no substantiating argument. If you fact check it you will find out how accurate it is on your own. Robert on the other hand substantiates his claims with evidence. he makes each one an actual argument explaining context and Islamic law as well as historical proofs.

Please share with anyone you feel would benefit from this.

 

Columbus and Islam: A little needed history

Posted on by

Given the time of Columbus’ voyage in 1492, being pretty close to the end of the period where Spain managed to take its own country back from invading, conquering and perhaps unprecedentedly cruel occupation by the Muslims in that same year, it always seemed to me that the real purpose of the voyage was not geometry, or for a better tasting sandwich, but likely to find a way to keep trade with India going by circumnavigating Muslim territory.

Mohammad, as you may or may not know, started his religion by robbing trade caravans in the desert and funded his larger military adventures that way. So one can imagine the cost of trade across Muslim territory would be horrifically high. (Just a point of interest to those who think Trump’s tariffs are a historical level threat.) The cost in lost merchandise, costs of funding an expedition and the staff who then became dead or slaves was too much.

So likely Columbus was looking for a way to make the cost of trade cheaper.

Nice to have the record set straight on that.

Raymond Ibrahim is a first rate scholar on Islam.

Winston Marshall interview on the whole gestalt including the history of evil of the New York Times

Posted on by

From the YouTube page:

In the aftermath of Mark Zuckerberg’s open letter to Jim Jordan and the arrest of Telegram’s Pavel Durov, renowned investigative journalist Ashley Rindsberg exposes the troubling history of media and social media bias and censorship at the highest levels. In this interview, Ashley reveals how the New York Times has shilled for authoritarian regimes from Stalin to Hitler and again today in America. He unpacks the troubling capture of Wikipedia by progressive interests and it’s relationship with YouTube, Google and the political establishment. The conversation explores the broader “digital civil war” as alternative voices challenge the establishment’s grip on information control. ———————————————————————————————————————– Linktree: https://linktr.ee/winstonmarshall

Israeli Scholar, Mordachai Kedar will be speaking in Toronto, June 25, 2024

Posted on by

This guy is a no-holds-barred scholar on Islam. The details on his in-person appearance is here. Below, some vides of his blistering rebuttals of Islamic narrative attacks on Jews and Israel. Video from 2019

On Islam’s claims to Israel and Jerusalem:

Dr. Kedar on Al Jazeera discusses Islamic and Arab history. Video from 2018:

Dr. Andrew Bostom on Dennis Prager

Posted on by

Pay special attention to the opinion of both men on the self named, ADL or “Anti-defamation League. In our opinion, a dialectical organization who’s purpose is to use Jewish identity as a vector for replacing liberty with communism. Beyond that, this is an excellent reality check on Islam and its central and historical antisemitism.

Story details at RAIR.

Are the globalists attempting to recreate the conditions of the French Revolution?

Posted on by

If the facts in the video below are correct, then it appears very much that current globalist leadership in every aspect, even if by different names and justifications, are attempting to recreate the exact conditions of the French revolution. From the destruction of modern faming, to massive unemployment, in our case through mass immigration. From the destruction of morality and religion to vast increases in prostitution and pornography. One of the things one notices consistently while observing the controlled (for the moment) destruction of our civilization, is that our enemies, Muslims and communists, seem to understand their history as it pertains to the West far better than we do.

‘If any person present knows of any inaccuracy in the video above, they should leave a comment now or forever strive for peace.’

A segment of Russian propaganda about the war against civilians in the Donbas region

Posted on by

This video, is an excerpt of a Russian propaganda video, explaining the motivations for the Russian incursion into Ukraine. While the video is clearly propaganda, that does not make it necessarily untrue, or any less true than anything you see on CNN most certainly. The fact that it is propaganda speaks more to its intention than its truthfulness.

In this case, this was an excerpt from a longer piece linked here, which used as a narrator, a child prodigy musician who is well known in Russia. We did not translate that part, but it can be watched at the link above.

One of our translators, who went over the whole clip, decided to do the part which is of interviews of people who live in the Donbas, or mostly Russian areas of Ukraine, that appear to have been under attack by the Ukraine military since at least 2016. This in no small part, appears to be one of the casus belli (Justification for war) for Russian military intervention in Ukraine.

We felt the public have a right to see this, especially in as much as NATO appears to be posturing to drag Western nations into this conflict.

This video was used as part of a larger RAIR article on a Russian interview with the former PM of Ukraine, who takes a profoundly pro-Russian position on the conflict.

UPDATE: Document on “the Whole Truth about Ukraine’s Crimes in the Donbas”

(Above a PDF download. Don’t know much about it, but if you are researching this conflict, it seems like an important document for understanding it)

 

France sees increasing danger to all teachers who fail to toe Islamic-socialist ideology

Posted on by

The West needs to pay close attention to these events. At this point its surprising that France at least even pays lip service to its own culture and values by offering these teachers protection. In Canada and the US I think we know what would happen to them. And this circumstance will happen more and more often, assuming there are any teachers left willing to stand up for Greek thought, Western values and freedom of conscience and speech.

Please read the whole story and details over at RAIR Foundation

Complete audiobook of the Myth of the Andalusian Paradise

Posted on by

This is an important book for several reasons. There is the obvious one. About how people are being conned that in some way, the great accomplishments of the Spanish people are somehow a result of their having been ersatz slaves under Muslim rule for many centuries. But also because this book shows us exactly how muslim money and leftists perverted scholarship over the last many decades. it gives names places and times for how this happened so we can know exactly what books incepted this nonsense and why.

Link to the book is here.

Below, Dr Daniel Janosik speaks with Tony Gurule to talk about the problems with Islamic Spain (known as Andalusia in ancient times)

Thank you EB.

 

Your daily laugh: A classic Leftist/Islamic attack on history

Posted on by

The highly amusing lie

The facts

When was Big Ben built?

The Palace of Westminster was destroyed by fire in 1834. In 1844, it was decided the new buildings for the Houses of Parliament should include a tower and a clock. 

A massive bell was required and the first attempt (made by John Warner & Sons at Stockton-on-Tees) cracked irreparably. The metal was melted down and the bell recast in Whitechapel in 1858.

Big Ben first rang across Westminster on 31 May 1859. A short time later, in September 1859, Big Ben cracked. A lighter hammer was fitted and the bell rotated to present an undamaged section to the hammer. This is the bell as we hear it today.

 

Mr. Jones: Netflix totally avoids saying communism even once

Posted on by

Last night I had the chance to watch the docu-drama, Mr. Jones.

While on the one hand, it is refreshing to see any pop culture reference to the Holomodor, something which pretty much no one knows about thanks in no small part to the subject of Mr. Jones, a certain historical class monster, Walter Durante, it is highly disturbing that at no point do they say why it happened.

The only other attempt to explain it is the excellent film, The Soviet Story. Something which should really be a mandatory part of all high school curricula.

In fact, as I write this, I am having a txt chat with a friend who also watched the film. And as I type here, he asked the question:

“I wonder what the conditions were for the massive starvation. It wasn’t bad crops”.

The fact that within hours of watching this movie a question like that would appear shows the failure of the movie and perhaps more sinisterly, the real agenda.

Netflix is notoriously leftist. On the board is Barack and Michelle Obama as well as Susan Rice. So it was a shock to hear they made a film about Durante at all. But it gets clearer after you watch it.

The Ukrainian genocide, you would think from the film, was not the fault of communism. No of course not. It was the fault of a hedonistic, corrupt, megalomaniac, sex fiend, white-male, American who worked for the New York Times and perhaps Stalin who was not doing things right. ‘Imperfect’ let’s say.

What they do not tell you, is that it is Communism that did this Genocide.

That Stalin was a good communist in the way that Mohammad was a good Muslim and Dr. Mengele was a good Nazi. They were all excellent representations of the ideology they believed in and acted on.

Politics is downstream from philosophy, and Stalin knew exactly the politics of Marx.

The film even went so far as to credit a famous saying by Stalin, “To make an omelette you have to break a few eggs”  to Durante. Which shows how anxious it was to foist this historical class crime on an American opportunist. Next project for Netflix, they will make a drama about how the tens of millions of deaths in China under Mao are the fault of Norman Bethune.

The Holodomor was about killing millions of people in the Ukraine for the exact same reason that Mao killed tens of millions of Chinese farmers. Because Communist ‘science’ required it. Which is never mentioned in the movie at all.

In fact there was no communist or Soviet iconography in the film, which was in fact as ubiquitous as Nazi icons were in Nazi Germany. (Early Nazi art was actually taken from Soviet art as we learn in The Soviet Story. A more real attempt to educate rather than deflect.)

The film also neglects this interesting titbit from Durante’s belief system:

Crowley of course, was famous for claiming to be The Antichrist, and although British, worked to undermine the allied war effort against the Nazis. Another Socialist government which is also whitewashed pretty much by everyone within a thousand miles of Hollywood.

Seeing as how both Marx and Alinsky dedicated their most important work to Satan, it seems like no coincidence that Durante would be a close friend of Crowley’s. Even to the point of cordially marrying Crowley’s mistress.

The film does do an interesting treatment of George Orwell, painting him as a sympathetic leftist desperate to believe that communism was working and a good thing in the Soviet Union, and even willing to justify the deaths of millions of Ukrainians as needed for the greater good. Of the survivors one presumes. All during this film, they cut to Orwell writing Animal Farm. But if even Wikipedia says that although a self proclaimed atheist and provocateur, he was a regular attendee of Church of England and a lover of Traditional British values, then I have to go with that.

As I watched there was one thing that did come to mind quite often though. It was that amazing quote by Goebbels that we post often on this site:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels

You certainly see that in action by Stalin and the Soviet Union all through this movie. But they do not credit the underlying philosophy to communism or fascism where it belongs.

At the end of the day, Mr. Jones is more a product of one of Orwell’s characters than it is of George Orwell himself, which the movie seems to imply at the beginning. Specifically Winston Smith, as the film clips facts that the party does not want known from history and burns them, and replaces them with the things you are to believe today as surely as 2+2=5.