Category Archives: United Kingdom

Please do not skip this post: FIVE major indicators of where Canada and the Anglosphere are now

Posted on by

1. Law Prof. Bruce Pardy speaks to how the state in Canada treated the Freedom convoy and its supporters are half of the equation proving that Canada was, is and is becoming an increasingly totalitarian authoritarian state.

On occasion one may find oneself in debate with leftists over the Freedom Convoy. So far, I have never had a disagreement with anyone who was actually in attendance. In fact I know of people who vehemently disagreed with the Convoy at the time until they were made to go and check it out in person, at which point, they admitted they had been lied to about it. However, all the people I have had this disagreement with, watch CBC, CTV and Global.

2. I found this interesting an a couple of levels. For one thing, I didn’t know she was talking about the UK till very far into the video. Which shows you that galloping statism, tyranny, is a Commonwealth wide issue. Not just Canada or the UK or Australia etc. But also because there is one point with which I very much disagree. She says this is not a new problem but has been developing over hundreds of years. This is not true. This is the result 100% of relatively recent efforts, maybe over 100 or so years by communist think tanks like The Frankfurt School, Runnymede Trust, The Fabian Society, the WEF, almost certainly the secret meetings of Bilderberg etc.

The battle between state power and individual power is indeed an ancient one. But the destruction of Republics, which basically formed after WW2 in the West is a recent effort, even if it has historical ties and precedents.

She also appears to be wearing a Catholic Rosary. Which kinda confirms that the only people willing to risk their personal liberty and safety for the rights of all of us, tend to be those who believe in God. Those who believe life is all you get, tend not to put themselves out for others like she is.

3. Similar stories in the West are quite common. This is because Muslim women are taught that the only virtue they can have is by supporting Islamic precepts, and the practice of Islamic precepts.

4. Can’t stress this importance of this enough, both to the UK and to Canada.

Note the dry contempt with which the Judge reads a Tweet, and then interprets it in a way to make it criminal and worthy of two years in prison.

The United States may have to give the same access to enter for British, Canadian and Australian people as they did once to Cubans.

Stephen Coughlin once, when at the curious meetings of the OSCE asked specifically if truth could be hate speech. This was May, of 2015. PLEASE pay close attention. This was clearly predicted by Maj. Coughlin and many others 11 years ago and earlier.

We are not posting it as an “I told ya so!” but because often when the prediction and model used for it is paired with the results down the road, it helps to cement it home what has actually happened. This is a very hard pill for many to swallow. Probably not people who read this site, but for sure the friends and family of those who read this site. We are attempting to provide data points to help enough people come around before the panopticon is complete. Which is very soon. To hopefully mobilize people into some kind of action that will stop and reverse the galloping tyranny and destruction of our nation-states, as well as the total deracination of our identities.

5. On this last one, I argued with Grok for quite a while on its veracity. The way it is filmed, graded and edited, I was pretty sure it was fake. It has the classic Hollywood, Orange and teal set design and colour grading. I love that look, but it’s better reserved for fiction as that is its purpose in a way. To help people ease into a narrative. The camera angles and so on. But Grok assured me this is real and provided me with the links to the data to prove it.

So once again, another massive conspiracy theory which we are all shouted down for, becomes fact.

DNI Press Release 

DNI graphics as evidence of the contention of bio-labs in Ukraine and elsewhere, doing gain of function work etc. 

And now I really wanna know more about tick borne illnesses.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This particular post feels like a kind of end game statement in a way. And in a way it is, This is the evidence that much of what we have claimed is happening, has now happened. As the statement at the Gates of Vienna says, “We are in a new phase of a very old war”. This is true. But this particular phase may mean that the normal means of defending one’s individual identity only exist as mirages, when they seem to exist at all.

Once again, we may have to look at the Egyptian example where the people took to the streets in 2011, and stayed there till they deposed a tyrant, not once, but twice within a short period. The first protests lasted from January 25th to February 11. The second round to depose Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammad Morsi, was in June/July of 2013. Both protests being around the same length as the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, but with a LOT more people. But then the people have to have a cost benefit to motivate them to take to the streets like that, which the current communist state apparatus may be too clever to allow to occur.

Douglass Murray notices the dialectic at work in the UK and lots of examples of policies built on it: Links 1 for June 3, 2026

Posted on by

1. This is not a Kirpan, and Starmer clearly wants these kinds of events to happen.

2. The UK is screwed. There is so much wrong here it would take more time to detail it all than we have. But the one thing that MUST be mentioned, is that it doesn’t matter a tinker’s damn if the guy DID make a racist remark. Stabbing someone is attempted murder and in this case murder. Hurty words are hurty words and not a crime. This means that the UK has now officially become a dialectic state in every sense the daily Reader’s Links post details, but more. That the state can impute what you mean by things, punish you for it, and even more, take an accusation of you having said hurty words as grounds to arrest and bleed out a stabbing victim. ALL of the arguments and apologies by the police are insane. They have no bearing on reality whatsoever.

3. Nope. not idiotic. That is Hanlon’s razor.

4. On the communist revolution moving from covert to overt:

5. I guess the 15 year old rape victim should be grateful she wasn’t arrested and handcuffed by police for racism.

Thank you all for reading this site.

I have seen a lot of exploding antisemitism recently. Often coming from the elite on the left. Wealthy and influential people who literally said “I celebrated Oct. 7th” and more along that vein. Jewish people are leaving Canada now, and many on social media are celebrating it. But it should be noted that those Jewish people who are leaving are often the highly skilled and disciplined people who provided a major service to Canadians to all who needed it. Like this Surgeon for example. I hope those people celebrating the loss will enjoy their replacements. It will be a very different Canada.

And one where it won’t just be religious Jews who personally choose not to eat pork for example, but one where you discover that all of your choices have been altered to suit the replacement religious group. This in fact has already happened.

The proportion of food in Canada that is now halal is so large that no one but no one can go through their cupboards and fridges and not have it in there. And it will become more difficult to make any choices that are not in accordance with the sharia, on more than just food.

It is far less safe for unaccompanied women to walk the streets of many areas now in Canada. So the joy of those happy to see the last of the Jewish people may be short lived. Or maybe not. Maybe they want this kind of Islamic-communsit dystopia forming from the narratives that have directed our choices, votes and thinking for decades now. From the metric system to gay marriage instead of something like a civil union.. From the belief in debating ideas to the utter suppression of any counter-narrative view. To the promotion of any concept that is destructive to Western Civilization like MAiD or the consecration and sanctification of abortion, to the near and looming criminalization of any view that opposes or even questions a destructive narrative. Like the mass graves that aren’t at residential schools. Themselves a progressive idea at the time.

Interestingly, Douglass Murray appears to have caught up to Vlad Tepes and noticed the dialectic and Hanlon’s Razor

 

 

 

 

The body cam footage of the police assisted murder of a British citizen by a Sikh attacker has been released

Posted on by

Article here

But they apologized so it’s all OK. Right?

 

Tempted to write an article about this, but at this point one wonders if telling the truth about how prioritizing Sikh murderers over British victims would constitute hate speech against British police and be the greater crime.

The full 1984ing of Great Britain is moving from the abstract and obvious to the blunt force and obvious: Anyone watching?

Posted on by

1. First, please understand the contents of this Tweet. Don’t skim this one. Think it through.

?? The Ministry of Justice has ordered the deletion of the UK’s largest court reporting archive.

Courtsdesk, a platform launched to improve media access to magistrates’ court data has been ordered to delete its archive of records by David Lammy’s Ministry of Justice.

According to Courtsdesk, the platform has since been used by more than 1,500 journalists from 39 media organisations and the data provided has highlighted serious failures in the courts system.

It said journalists were given no advance notice of 1.6 million criminal hearings, the number of court cases listed was accurate on just 4.2 per cent of sitting days and half a million weekend cases were heard with no notification to the press.

In November, HM Courts and Tribunal Service issued the company a cessation notice, citing what it called “unauthorised sharing” of court data, on the basis of a test feature, claiming this was a “data protection issue.”

Enda Leahy, the Courtsdesk chief executive said: “We built the only system that could tell journalists what was actually happening in the criminal courts.

We wrote 16 times asking for dialogue. Last week we got our answer: delete everything. If the government were interested in open justice, they would engage in a dialogue.”

Follow:
@europa

So what does this mean? Well, it’s self explanatory. But is it equal across the board? Of course not. Dialectical societies use information like a shape charge. It destroys whatever the target du jour is.

2. This goes a long way to explaining it.

3. More on this exact thing. a demand for the data on Muslim sex slavery gangs and harems of white British girls.

4. Winston Smith’s job description at the Ministry of Truth, or MINITRU as they preferred to be called, according to Chat GPT

Winston worked in the Records Department at MINITRU, where his task was to:

  • Rewrite past newspaper articles

  • Alter historical records

  • Correct “errors” in previous Party statements

  • Ensure the past always matched the Party’s current claims

If the Party said something yesterday that later proved wrong, Winston’s job was to change the past so it looked like the Party had always been right.

How he did it

  • He received instructions through pneumatic tubes

  • He edited text using a speak-write machine

  • The original records were destroyed in a “memory hole” (incinerator system)

  • The revised version became the official truth

The deeper purpose

His job wasn’t just clerical — it was ideological:

  • To make objective truth disappear

  • To ensure reality depended on Party control

  • To enforce the principle: “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”

I bolded and made red one of the points in the description. In Ontario, there are directives to get rid of any book prior to when cultural-Marxism entered the mainstream, This is taking place across the West, showing that the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury should also be understood for its messaging and as a prescription to help keep ideas and truth as literature alive such that one day when the dialectic state defeats itself, reality as a governing principle for the state and for ourselves as individuals can be restored.

“There is a German proverb: ‘Mut verloren — alles verloren’ (When courage is lost, all is lost). There is also a Latin saying: the loss of reason is the true harbinger of destruction. What happens to a society when both these losses — the loss of courage and the loss of reason — intersect? This is the picture which I have found the West presents today.”

From Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Harvard commencement address, titled:

“A World Split Apart.”

 

The UK, in its rush to go full Soviet, is passing laws that will criminalize casual speech in a bar, and penalize bartenders and waitresses if they fail to report you for it

Posted on by

Those who have not yet read The Gulag Archipelago. and or 1984, may want to start right away.

One of the fascinating aspects of the Gulag Archipelago, is the occasional use of the word, Dialectics. At one point, in book 1, section 1, Page 100-101 it is explained that a dialectic is kind of an equivalent of a Fatwa. It is a decree of something ludicrously untrue and destructive to your person and liberties but must be obeyed. At this point, Islam, 1984 in its portrayal of communism and The Gulag Archipelago in its matter of fact description of communism as it actually operated in real time in front of the author and his witnesses, intersect perfectly.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich (one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which

became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for The Interrogation mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only. He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth established by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,

so to speak, relative. Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.8 Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable

witnesses-for they can say different things at different times. The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interrogator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity, his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)

For me at least, this compares perfectly with the part of 1984 where it is explained in Goldstein’s Book:

In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four.

 

And now in the UK, some of the most astonishing narrative enforcement measures ever in that ancient kingdom.

Having said that, as a Canadian, I have been extremely careful what I say near a waiter or waitress, because at this point the left has been so inculcated with hate, certainty and entitlement already, that while they may not as yet be able to call the police on you, what they can do to your food or drinks may be worse. So situational awareness all around please ladies and gentlemen.

Short segment of The Gulag Archipelago: The nature of crime in a communist polity

Posted on by

Solzhenitsyn’s book is maybe one of the most important documents in political history.

People tend to write about the unusual, and ignore the normal, no matter how recently the bizarre became normalized.

As a result, we don’t have as many records of things from the past that reflect the day to day reality.

Just for an example, as a bird photographer among a group of bird photographers, we really don’t have many, if any, pictures of pigeons, starlings, crows or the myriad of little brown birds all over the place, but tend to focus on the rare, bizarre, magnificent or beautiful ones that take effort to find and get a decent photo of.

The Gulag Archipelago is the day to day machinations of a communist society. It is an amazingly powerful read if you are looking for the signs of growing totalitarianism in order to properly estimate your personal, or collective cost-benefit to fighting back against a state, increasingly divorcing itself from the interests of the people in general. More accurately, a power structure that increasingly oppresses the public, rather than solves problems or is an administrator of basis systems for them.

Like reading 1984 today, these books suddenly make sense as our personal experience begins to overlap with the frame of reference of the authors of the books. And no, this isn’t a good thing in terms of what is happening to us. Not having to read a map is good. But having one when you are lost is also good. And that is what these books are.

In this segment, there is a string of descriptions of arbitrary arrests and the reasons given for them. It is a very small sample of the ones in Alexander’s book, which is a very very small sample of the ones that actually took place. But I chose to truncate this file because the last one seems eerily like a string of recent arrests in the UK.

I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide what relationship, if any, these two cases have with each other. Not to mention the other 30 odd arrests every day in the UK for thought crimes. Many of which are posted here, and many more are on X.

 

 

 

The Sultanate of the Proletarian state of Great Britainistan

Posted on by

One of the most telling aspects of a Communist state, is the curious way in which all people are empowered to destroy anyone else in that polity, so long as it enhances the power of the state and the state narratives.
Having had numerous conversations, (although not nearly as many as I want to) with expats from the former Soviet Union and beyond the iron curtain, one common feature is how a neighbour can rat you out to the state and get you taken away or otherwise destroyed if you for example, fail to publicly grieve for a dead official with sufficient intensity.

No where is this more obvious than in North Korea. But I am reliably told this also happened in Poland and other parts of Soviet Controlled Eurasia.

If a person had a romantic interest in a woman, or did want want to pay back a loan, the constant looming threat of being outed for some kind of thought crime was an effective form of blackmail. Pretty much exactly like blasphemy laws in Islam.

Currently there is a case against a boy in Pakistan who is facing the death penalty for receiving a blasphemous image on his phone from someone. No one has seen this image, and no evidence of it is presented. But he was found guilty of having recieved it and may be murdered by the state because of it if there isn’t massive US state dept. intervention.

Which reminds me of my first exposure to Islamic law well over 20 years ago. There was an article in the Ottawa Citizen about a boy who was alleged to have thrown a piece of paper with blasphemous writing on it off the back of a motorcycle towards a mosque. But Pakistani law says that a sharia court judge may not look upon anything blasphemous. So he had to take the prosecution’s word for it and find the accused guilty on the say-so of the prosecutor that inside this sealed cigar box, was a piece of paper with a blasphemous writing which had been hurled at a mosque by a kid on a motorbike.

And once again we see there is no meaningful daylight between Islam and communism.
Currently, across the West, but with focus on the Anglosphere for the moment (shy of the US thank Trump) laws are being implemented that causing offence to an arbitrarily defined, protected group. And for that matter, even entirely fictitious groups so long as people can be persuaded to claim to belong to it.

Also laws are being passed that allow anyone to report anyone who might be in breach of those laws, and hold people to account for even an unrelated person breaking those laws. And even if someone suspects that someone else might say something which could be offensive to some self identified member of a fictitious group.

So it seems as if a bar owner can be held liable if a customer of that bar says something in any context that an employee can arbitrarily decide was offensive.

This is of course, a dialectic attack on the individual. The removal of real rights to invented collective rights, and enforceable arbitrarily by the state to the point of whimsy. Less whimsical though, is that enforcement will pretty much always be whatever is the most destructive to classical constitutional republics like the West was post WW II.

The precedent has been created for decades as well. The incremental destruction of agency for the purpose of collective guilt as defined by the state. The fact that a bartender can be held responsible for what an adult does who gets himself drunk and gets in an accident even if the bartender had no idea how much the patron had to drink.

And my personal favorite, a woman can go to a bar, get herself drunk, pick up a man, drag him home, undress and have sex with him and in the morning if she wishes she hadn’t done those things, according to Canadian law, the man is guilty of rape.

What all of these things have in common is the attack on the individual. The assumption that people have agency and are responsible for their actions as well as may enjoy the rewards of them, such as hard work and disciplined savings.

And of course, the constant, looming threat of utter tyranny and the deracination of the individual, even as a concept in one’s own mind.

The mRNA shots coercion proved that out well. A large percentage of the population defaulted to collective rights at the expense of anyone who felt their right to refuse something which was frankly, patently insane. You either had to give yourself an autoimmune disease to protect your grandmother who you couldn’t visit anyway or have your whole life’s work destroyed. Your vaccine protects the public. The collective good, as defined not by science, but by the state’s literal declaration of what the science was, as Fauci himself declared out loud.

Scientism in a word.

Black Belt Barrister has a video on the newest vice-like crushing destruction of the individual in Great Britain under Sultan Starmer. Or is it Comrade Sultan Starmer.

This is and has also been happening in Canada for a long long time. And Comrade Carney’s actions since taking the reins have been so consistent with everything Trudeau has done, it also adds fuel to the idea that Carney was always the architect behind Trudeau’s destruction of Canada.

No idea if this is true or not yet, but I wouldn’t bet against it. This appears to be the source but I can’t find that actual info yet.

John Ivison: The first Carney spending numbers are out, and they’re as bad as Trudeau’s

 

The real nature of the UK and Canada are coming into focus, as well as the corruption and ideology of the last US administration: Links 1 for May 21, 2025

Posted on by

There is quite a laundry list of items waiting to be posted I’m afraid, and all of them are worth attention from the perspective of this site.

The fact that the UN-WHO has actually passed the “Pandemic-Treaty”, with all the totalitarian and anti-democratic measures reinstalled into it, including that the WHO can declare when there is a Pandemic, (and there is one at least every year, even if reality matters anymore) and thereby suspend all national laws to all member states should be grounds for a people’s revolution the likes of which has never been seen. But most don’t know about it. And if you try and tell people, they will likely take you off their Christmas card list.

The head of the WHO, a certain Eritrean Marxist terrorist called up Fico, the PM of Slovakia a day or two ahead of the UN treaty vote and asked him to just sign the thing and skip all that pesky democracy, knowing that the Slovak Parliament would vote against the treaty. He said no. It passed anyway at the UN.

Mark Carney is likely shoulder to shoulder with the architects of this new ‘treaty’. And when they call a pandemic, and they will soon, Canadians will think Covid was a cake walk. The ability to refuse some kind of treatment will be much lessened than during Covid. Carney has been creating new powers for himself, similar to executive powers in the US but more arbitrarily created, and apparently, Canada won’t have a budget this year meaning no need to even pretend to Parliament, which I dunno, is it still prorogued? No idea… which means he doesn’t even have to pretend to be accountable with all the billions he is just signing for, and dispensing willy nilly without any kind of transparency.

HIs supporters will either deny this or claim its adult behaviour that we desperately need. It doesn’t matter anymore though. Carney is or is not a tyrant. If he is, it won’t matter who supports him or what they say about him. The only people able to do anything about it will be in his employ.

1. This is a good article on the conviction of Tamara Lich and Chris barber after a 13 month ‘Mischief’ trial. Worth the read.

Does the right to peacefully protest and freedom of speech still exist in Canada?

The Freedom Convoy was sparked by the Liberal government’s insistence that truck drivers entering Canada who were unvaccinated be required to quarantine for 14 days. Others entering Canada who were unvaccinated were required to quarantine for five days. The requirement was an outlier among nations where other countries continued to view truck drivers – who drove their trucks in solitude – as an essential part of the supply chain, and foundational to sustaining the economy. In response to the protest that lasted from January 28 to February 20, 2022, the government invoked the Emergencies Act, froze hundreds of citizens bank accounts without warrants, and had police use physical violence against non-violent protesters to end the protest.

Two of the participants in the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa in the winter of 2022, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, have been found guilty of mischief. On April 3, 2025, a verdict was delivered in the longest mischief trial in Canadian history. I was in the courtroom to hear the verdict read. Mischief trials typically last half a day. The verdict was delivered after 45 non-consecutive days of a trial which stretched from September 5, 2023 until September 23, 2024.

Showing unity with a large group of people, no matter how long someone participates, can also be considered mischief. Both Lich and Barber were charged with six counts: 1) counselling mischief “which was not committed,” 2) intimidation and counselling intimidation, 3) counsel others to obstruct police, 4) obstruct police, 5) “that they…did wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling one or more persons to abstain from doing anything that the person had the lawful right to do, or do anything that the person had a lawful right to abstain from doing, block or obstruct one or more highways,” and 6) Mischief. [1]

On a seventh count, Barber alone was charged “with disobeying a court order which was not committed,” regarding the February 7, 2022 injunction to stop honking horns (or encouraging others to honk horns in the future). [2]

Please read the rest at the link above. Also this Chris Dacey thread on today’s testimony by Chris Barber with important facts about his role in the Convoy.

2. A British woman made this Tweet shortly after 11 little girls had been stabbed in Sothport by a Muslim waging jihad and during the minimalist pushback immediately after. She got two and a half YEARS in prison.

By this standard everyone who ever fought the Nazis or encouraged others to fight the Nazis would be in prison for years.
Which goes to the hypothesis that the Nazis, as represented by the Fabian Society, are actually in control of the UK.

Seems insane to you? Ladies and Gentlemen, The FOUNDER of the Fabiens:

Charlie Kirk speaks on this issue with GBN News:

3. Truly fascinating Tweet by President Trump. It goes a very long way to revealing the fact that Biden was never in control of his own bowels let along the US government. That he had been used by an evil group of people and that they should be hunted down, and tried for a large variety of very serious crimes. Crimes which are in the constitution as death penalty offences.

Related:

4. Going back to item 2 for a sec, if you thought the UK couldn’t get any more Orwellian than it is now…

5. I am certain this site has readers that have the mathematical skills to verify the claims in this Facebook video. Almost as certain as I am that his claims are accurate on the face of them. Any and all comments appreciated on this one. But it really does look like the paint, the furniture, the curtains and the lights of the theatre are coming down fast and the cinderblock substance of the authoritarian nature of Canada is coming into view. To borrow an analogy from Frank Zappa.

Thank you for checking out this site and its perspectives.

Gotta like this guy

No opposition to state narratives can be permitted in a communist or dialectical state: Example UK and abortion

Posted on by

 

This is the letter sent to Scottish households near abortuariums.

GB.

 

 

Fiat currency, war, and the anti-state using hotels as barracks against Western civilization

Posted on by

I have probably logged well over 100 hours and maybe many multiples of that, discussing with friends and ideological foes as well, the economic system and value of fiat currency Vs. gold or crypto etc. etc. ad nauseam.

I claim zero expertise on economics. It’s all voodoo to me. Actually I understand voodoo much better than economics. Make a powerful drug, invent a narrative, then deploy the drug secretly in such a way that the people who see its effects think its the narrative at work and not the drug. Maybe economics is also like that in some ways.

But the following story is perhaps the best example of why a state should not have the power to invent money by just printing and deploying it.

First of all, this man defines for us a couple of important terms. He defines corruption by not being corrupt and he defines integrity by refusing a dump truck full of money because he was offered it for something terrible, and evil. The total destruction of his town, culture, way of life and people. In a sense, you could say that integrity means someone who recognizes that money is not the only currency in life, and that what you take money for can often be to sell something of much greater value than what you can do with the money. After all, what profiteth a man if he gains the world but the world is a totally awful place to live as a consequence?

We can also learn that the people offering him the money are not corrupt. They are ideologically consistent. They intend to destroy everything Western forever. They are not selling out what they have for fleeting wealth. They are the principal agents of destruction. The hotel owners that take the money to destroy the towns and cities however, are corrupt and deserve whatever contempt and defiance can be heaped upon them.

Allowing the state to just invent money is what gives it the power to pay people to self destruct.

We see this across the West now, where the communist revolutionaries who have their hands on the presses, are printing money to fund armies of protestors and disruptors, pay off institutions to either not do their jobs or do the opposite of their jobs such that an institution which keeps an aspect of our civilization working properly, then makes it unstable and destructive, and then narratives are used to stop people from pointing it out. DEI is the easiest example. But BLM, ANTIFA and many others are also easy examples.

The case for fiat though, is also powerful.

If a nation finds itself attacked by a neighbour or enemy at any distance, bent on its obliteration, then the state being attacked has a number of options. Two of them would be to borrow money from banks to finance an army to resist the attack. This means the survival of the nation, people and culture is dependant on how much of a risk the bank feels the loan is worth. So it may refuse it, or it may make the loan so expensive that they just change who holds the whip hand from the enemy to the banks. Or, they could print the money, finance the army and hopefully win, and over the course of a generation or two of proper financial management, amortize the costs of printing money such that the public doesn’t feel it much or at all. Clearly that has been the US strategy for some time now.

Ultimately it boils down to who holds the levers of the printing press. Those who actually represent the culture, values and history of the people whose printing press they control? Or someone whose real intention is to use those tools to end them, and even the remembrance of them now, and forever. A black-hole magnitude memory hole.

Either way, that hotel owner should be on a speaking tour of the whole western world. What better proof that the people running Western nations are out to deracinate us. This is the smoking gun we knew was there, we have seen for years, but never actually heard first hand, probably because the people who took the money where both sworn to silence and hopefully because they are very, very ashamed.

One thing is for sure. Should we pull civilization out of the fire somehow, charges need to be laid on those who took the money to knowingly house illegals, which is in no way different than charges are often laid against people who profit from any other kind of crime.

  • 18 U.S. Code § 2 – Principals (Aiding and Abetting):

  • 18 U.S. Code § 1956 – Money Laundering:

    • Overview: This law criminalizes conducting financial transactions with proceeds from unlawful activities, including profiting from such activities.?
    • Full Text: Access the statute’s text at: ?Findlaw

Add to that war crimes, and we have appropriate charges for the hotel owners who sold out our countries.

The systematic destruction of rule of law in the legislature of the UK

Posted on by

The UK allegedly left the EU in BREXIT. Instead, it raced ahead of most of it to Orwellian communism, and medieval sharia. Germany is there for sure as we read at RAIR the other day about the German journalist, jailed for thought crimes. But the UK is moving that way officially in every direction it can, as opposed to Germany, or Canada for that matter, where the defacto is separate from the dejure for now, until they adjust the official way things are done till they sort of match again.

Now the UK is making prison terms much harsher for white British males than anyone else for the identical crimes and circumstances. This, is equity over equality. And is most certainly dialectics. And is therefore, communism in any meaningful sense.

On the sharia side, although the above is also sharia, we have this proposed new law in the UK:

Possessing photos of a Muslim woman without her hijab should be made a criminal offence, MPs say

Possessing photos of a Muslim woman without her hijab should be made a criminal offence, MPs have proposed.

The Commons’ women and equalities committee said pictures of a Muslim woman without her headscarf – taken without her consent – should be considered ‘non-consensual intimate images’.

Such photographs should be treated the same as child sex abuse images, possession of which can carry long prison sentences, the MPs said.

RAIR Foundation also has a more in depth article about this written by Teresa Monroe-Hamilton:

Labour Party MPs are falling all over themselves in Britain to have the nation bow before Shariah. They are proposing that any picture of a Muslim woman without her hijab (Shariah head covering) should be treated as a crime akin to revenge porn or some such nonsense.

This comes from the Commons’ Women and Equalities Committee, according to the Daily Mail. The British MPs are equating any picture taken of a Muslim woman while she is not wearing her headscarf without her consent to “non-consensual intimate images.” This is the act of overlaying British law with Shariah, more or less turning the British into an Islamic Ummah one step at a time, and they are pretty much there already.

Ummah in Arabic refers to the Muslim community or the collective of Islamic believers. It can also mean “nation” or “religious community.” Shariah is Islamic religious law that guides Muslims’ personal and communal lives. In many Islamic nations, it rules above all else and can be brutal when carried out. Many Muslims only recognize Shariah, or at the very least, put it before other laws. They seek to insert it into the legal system where they are living in any way possible.

But wait, there’s more!

If you are anything but a Christian white male, you are less likely to go to jail for the same crime

Like the vast majority though, he doesn’t get that this is not “two tier” but the replacement of a system based on equality and merit, with a dialectical system which reverses the entire concept of process to outcome. The outcome is predetermined for political reasons, and the process must create that result. That is not two tier. It just looks that way on flatland. 

It certainly is one way for the UK and other Western governments to deal with this chronic problem.

After all, from the perspective of the indigenous Brits, soon to be consigned to reservations, violently raping their young daughters is a crime. So it shall be a crime if one of them does this. But to Islam, it is recommended to take infidel women as slave girls etc. So for them, it won’t be a crime. Problem of Muslim invaders to the UK creating massive child sex slave harems, solved. Not a crime when they do it.

UK Parliament discuss destroying equality and rule of law

Keir Starmer signs 100 year partnership with Ukraine, hints at conscription in the UK

Posted on by 

"The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives,
but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces,
or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea,
materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable,
and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are
not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of
expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed.
A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that
would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as
obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with
further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built. In principle
the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might
exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs
of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is
a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on
as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups
somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity
increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the
distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early
twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere,
laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy
his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the
better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three
servants, his private motor-car or helicopter--set him in a different world
from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have
a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call
'the proles'. The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the
possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and
poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and
therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste
seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival."

-George Orwell. 1984

Labour MP in UK assist in total destruction of central freedoms with fake challenge

Posted on by

First, those who don’t agree that the entire purpose of freedom of speech is to criticize, mock, ridicule and otherwise challenge religious and political authority should ask themselves what is its purpose then? Because the second you cannot challenge or speak your mind about political and religious authority in any way you want, then everything else gets placed under the rubric of either politics, or religion. Including women’s fashion. Don’t believe me? Try and criticize what women have to wear in Islamic countries and suggest something more fashionable and see how that goes for you.

And now, the dialectic in action with another Labour MP in on the assist for the total destruction of freedom of speech in the UK:

We have often described how in Canada and elsewhere, the media would pretend to speak truth to power by bringing on government officials at one level or another and appear to be asking tough questions, but in reality were demanding that the governing leftists do more to crush freedoms and questioned why so much liberty was still permitted.

For example why more harsh vaxx mandates were not imposed, or why no curfews like Quebec had in a challenging tone. This allowed the government to appear benevolent by saying those measures were not needed at the time, but also opening the doors for these measures when they thought they would be. At no time did the MSM ask them if any of these measures where ever necessary or even legal or constitutional.

Here we see the exact same play in the UK Parliament. A Muslim Labour MP named Tahir Ali wants desecration of all religious texts and … well read it from his own Tweet:

Full text:

During PMQs today, I asked the Prime Minister to introduce measures to prohibit desecration of religious texts and targeted vilification of all the prophets of the Abrahamic faiths.

As November marks Islamophobia Awareness Month, it is vital the Government takes clear and measurable steps to prevent acts that fuel hatred in society.

Nice play. It makes Muslims look like they care about other “Abrahamic faiths” to get what they want, which is Islamic blasphemy laws, while the communists get total control of freedom of speech, which is what they want. An accelerant is guaranteed to follow if this proceeds at all:

Buddhists, Hindus and all observers or just people who identify with faiths other than the “Abrahamic” ones, will demand the same protection for their own symbols, deities and so on. And of course, they will get it. Karl Marx will be protected no doubt, and along with him, Stalin, Lenin, Mao and yes, probably even Hitler, unless they continue to use him as the God of Evil instead of the socialist tyrant he was, in competition with Stalin. And with each new restriction, the state grows more and more powerful.

Below, South Park explains this scam in the not-ironically now banned episodes called, Cartoon Wars. This is a short clip from Episode 1 of the 2 part series. Anyone who has not seen it owes it to themselves to find the (I think 5) banned episodes of South Park and watch them all. This was first broadcast on April 12, 2006. That would be going on 19 years ago.

Loss of freedoms is done by increments, where the first increment is sold to the public as a noble or good enough thing to justify an ‘exception’ to fundamental freedoms.

Making antisemitism illegal is far too good an example to ignore.

Chat GPT: “During The Weimar Republic (1919-1933): In the interwar period, following World War I, the Weimar Republic provided Jews with legal equality, enshrined in the constitution of the republic. Jews were full citizens and participated widely in the cultural, political, and economic life of the country. ”

That made no difference once Hitler worked his way into power, just as all the hate speech laws make no difference today whatsoever, other than protecting antisemitic speech, and ignoring its targets. Examples of that are too numerous to even link to, although recent clips with Ezra Levant are exemplars.

We all have to stand up for all freedom of speech, at least in the legal space. This doesn’t mean private domains like this have to tolerate speech which is insulting or anathema. But neither would we consider it a legal matter, or one deserving of reporting to any kind of authority unless it contained a criminal threat with immediacy. In other words, a threat with a time and place attached to it.

More importantly, we have to know what we see, when someone appears to be defending our rights when in fact they are targeting them for obliteration.

Some of Trump’s cabinet picks, and a couple more examples of the Ministry of Justice as it is in the UK today

Posted on by

One reason we haven’t said much about the Trump cabinet picks is that I’m afraid I’ll wake up and find out it was all a dream.

Also, the expectation that there is a plan in place to greatly damage both America and the incoming Trump admin 2.0. Fauci in 2017 made it clear that they would do exactly that to his first term. Many people feel, and with great justification, that a financial catastrophe which has been created by the Democrat COMINTERN govt since Obama is ready to be launched like a torpedo against us all with Trump in the big chair. Or, in some other sector, or another pandemic with the UN Pandemic treaty being the goal this time as well as other forms of submission to the “new world order”. So enthusiasm is being kept on a leash for now.

 

So here are a few items of hope, as well as policy statements that at least for the moment look like knock-it-out-of-the-park counter revolutionary moves.

1. A few words on Israel and policy by and about the new Trump defence pick:

2. This item is to make two points. The first being choosing RFK Jr. as the top dog in all agencies concerning public health and medicine, could not possibly be a better choice. I have read roughly 2/3rds of his book, The Real Anthony Fauci and his case on the problems is based on science and historical facts. More interestingly, Fauci has not made any moves to try and sue him for defamation whatsoever. Much like David Fisman has not made a peep about the excellent and important book, Fisman’s Fraud around the exact same issues concerning Covid deceptions and the vaxx lies in Canada. The author, Regina Watteel Ph.D., even named her book as lawsuit bait and nothing. The second point is how CTV spins and spits it:

Technically this is more lie and enemy propaganda than spin. RFK has never been against all vaccines and has stated so frequently. Anyone who bothers to listen to him speak his own mind knows this. CTV operates under dialectical lines of operation though. The phrase, ‘anti-vaxxer’ was created to be a pejorative for anyone who questioned the safety or methodology or necessity of the mRNA shots for Covid. He is also against all other vaccines which have not met the prescribed medical safety testing, or has been shown to do more harm than good over the term it has been in use. Calling a person like that an “anti-vaxxer’ is like calling someone who objects to forcible raping of women “anti-sex”. And this is what makes it a dialectic. The clever commie trick of switching levels of abstraction in order to create the wrong impression but the results the communists want. Here is Dr. Peter McCullough on the issue.

3. This one is unconfirmed, but interesting. Kash Patel Reportedly in Consideration for FBI Director

Kash Patel, one of the leading figures in discrediting the Democrats’ Russia Collusion Hoax and defending Trump, is reportedly being considered for the role of FBI Director in the next Trump Administration. 

Kash Patel, one of the leading figures in discrediting the Democrats’ Russia Collusion Hoax and defending Trump, is reportedly being considered for the role of FBI Director in the next Trump Administration.

It was previously reported that according to GOP sources, Kash Patel was rumored to be in consideration for the head of the CIA. However, President Trump announced on Tuesday that John Ratcliffe would be the new Director of the CIA.

Still, as The Gateway Pundit reported, Patel is rumored to be in consideration for head of the FBI. GOP Sources have also independently confirmed this to The Gateway Pundit.

Additionally, Congressman-elect Abe Hamadeh, when asked Wednesday if Kash Patel would have a place in the Trump Administration, told The Gateway Pundit, “He’ll do amazing at the FBI,” noting that “he’s been very loyal to President Trump since the first Russia Collusion Hoax.”

Going from memory, I think 4 or more US presidents have pretty clearly stated the danger that the Intel agencies are to the Republic. I think even Biden mumbled something about not crossing those guys. So whoever he picks will be one to watch. I still think the Babylon Bee headline says it best:

“FBI discovers that it is harder to solve crimes they did not actually commit”.

4. Trump on dealing with college antisemitism:

I find it interesting that this is also how he restored freedom of speech to universities in his first term. He explained that all federal funds to universities that denied the first amendment rights of non-leftist clubs on campus and denied the speakers they chose to come and speak would be suspended. The next day, students who had been denied club status etc. got calls from the dean’s office for a meeting about getting the clubs going. The freee market solves a lot of problems. Like Canada’s current postal strike, getting rid of the law that says no private company can compete with the post office for regular mail would make the strike totally irrelevant, which means it would not happen at all.

In this case, Trump is not denying the 1st amendment rights of people who want to slander Jews. He is just not paying for it. Fair enough. This is an order of magnitude better than applying hate speech laws, which are a communist dialectic and are to hate speech, what gun control laws are to violent crime and what Global Warming BS is to fixing pollution. It is the correct solution, to stop federal funding.

5. Trump explains that Biden has two waves of illegals. The known ones from Mexico etc. And a massive wave of jihadis.

6. New US Director of Intel: Tulsi Gabbard

https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1857087137822171314?t=qzhkt_7p5YDbUlA0gxZwxg&s=19

Thank you all for your kind attention.

Here are a couple of items that probably should be added to yesterday’s post:

U.K. police continue sweep of arrests over ‘offensive’ social media posts

[…] Aside from murder, Rudakubana is facing charges of producing the poison ricin and the possession of an al Qaeda training manual.

The wave of arrests in the U.K. for so called hate speech and offensiveness via social media continues. On Friday, video surfaced of a man being arrested for saying online that he does not want Palestinian flags displayed across the U.K. 

Police officers came to his home at 4 a.m. 

In another case, Irish teacher Enoch Burke was arrested at Wilson’s Hospital School after a series of events involving his refusal to endorse and affirm transgender ideology, reported Sky News.

Burke is currently in prison for breaching a court order.

Some Canadians are worried Canada under Justin Trudeau is heading in the same direction as the U.K. and other countries when it comes eroding civil liberties and censorship.

According to a Fraser Institute report, Canada’s Online Harms Act contains “tucked within it amendments that are not about anything online but are hate-related offences.”

And this item: