More Pakistani Muslim plans to attack Indian civilians

INDIAN police say they have arrested two men for planning to attack a fuel facility and a shopping centre in Mumbai, where Pakistani gunmen killed 166 people 15 months ago.

Mumbai’s anti-terrorism police chief, K.P. Raghuvansh, told reporters that the two men were Indian and had taken orders from inside Pakistan.

They intended to target a fuel storage complex owned by state-run energy firm Oil and Natural Gas as well as a popular shopping arcade, he said.

“These two have been in constant touch with their handlers sitting across the border in Pakistan, who want to do something in India,” he said.

“When we thought they were planning to act, we arrested them.”

India has blamed the Pakistan-based Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba for the November 2008 attacks on luxury hotels, a restaurant and a cultural centre in Mumbai.

Nine of the ten people who carried out the attacks died as security forces fought to regain control of the city.

The sole surviving gunman, who is currently on trial, has said he is a Pakistani national.

The Press Trust of India news agency named the two men arrested late on Saturday as Abdul Latif Rashid, 29, and Riyaz Ali, 23.

Last month 11 people were killed in a blast at a restaurant in the city of Pune, near Mumbai.

A previously unknown Islamist group claimed responsibility.

Phyllis Chesler: Victim blames herself for being raped and beaten by Muslim?

The other day, a pediatric nurse in New York City refused to dance with Mbarek Lafrem, a Moroccan man, in a New York City bar. What did Lafrem do? He followed her into the women’s bathroom where he attempted to rape and savagely beat her. The woman was found unconscious and is now hospitalized. She required 50 stitches to close just one of her lacerations; she also suffered a broken eye socket, a broken nose, skull fractures, and a busted jaw.

The media pointedly refrain from telling us that he is a Muslim, but with a name like “Mbarek” or ‘Mubarak,” what religion are we talking about? Lafrem now claims that she started it, that the nurse “berated him when he barged into the women’s restroom shortly after she’d rebuffed him on the dance floor.”

To a certain kind of man, from a certain kind of culture, women are always supposed to say yes, and when they say no they are provokers and deserve a beating. More: If the woman is a naked-faced infidel and dances with strange men in a public setting—she is, by definition, a prostitute and is not entitled to say no. Saying no is a “provocation” and deserves a beating. Or worse.

Now, let’s shuffle off to Buffalo, where Muzzammil ”Mo” Hassan—remember him?–is about to stand trial for beheading his wife, Aasiya Zubair Hassan. Guess what this monster’s claiming? That he’s the victim, that he was a “battered husband.” Guess what this crafty self-promoter has been doing from his jail cell? Writing letters to the media in his mother’s name in which he paints himself as the “abused” spouse. Mo’s letters also refer to an “epidemic” of battered men.

For the rest please visit this excellent site:

Something is Rotten in Rotterdam

Taken verbatim from Gates of Vienna:

Our Flemish correspondent VH has compiled a report about massive voting fraud during the recent municipal elections in Rotterdam, mainly in immigrant neighborhoods. His account reminds me of what happened in Philadelphia in November 2008, when armed New Black Panther auxiliaries at the polling stations made certain that white voters understood who was in charge of Philly.

VH includes this explanatory note:

What happened in Rotterdam is something for others in Europe to be aware of at their next local or national elections. An official from Leefbaar Rotterdam visited polling stations in immigrant neighborhoods early in the morning, to see whether the voting process went neatly and according to law, but he was shocked at what he encountered, at almost any polling station he went to visit. Many complaints and witness reports followed later that day (when the outcome was still fully unknown). This happened previously in Rotterdam and Amsterdam in 2006, and also occurred in other cities last week. But it seems the worst cases were of fraud and intimidation were in Rotterdam.

Rotterdam vote fraudIn the Netherlands, immigrants without a Dutch passport and/or knowledge of Dutch language are allowed to vote in municipal elections.

The photo at right was taken at one of those polling stations, showing people together in a voting booth telling someone who to vote for.

Below is an article from Contradicere, as translated by VH:

Municipal elections in Rotterdam: what happened?

by Contradicere

Rotterdam Mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb admits that unauthorized things took place in the polling stations in his city.

Aboutaleb [finally] admits that it has been proven that in at least 13 polling stations voters were influenced to vote for a certain party. Sometimes even by parties present there. Possibly even by the staff present there.

In a number of polling stations people huddled together in a voting booth. In a significant number of cases this was done under the eye of the polling staff, who did not interfere. In some cases it was tolerated.

There are cases which go beyond imagination. In a number of cases witnesses speak in particular about the elderly — including indigenous people — where intimidated even into the voting booth to vote for a “certain” (read: PvdA, Socialists, Labour) party.

In some cases people came into the polling stations with a letter especially for those who do not speak the Dutch language, which contained instructions on which party to vote for (PvdA) and even which candidate. Continue Reading →

When Kurds can’t have their way

Scuffles broke out between Iraqi Kurds and British police at a polling station in London after many Kurds were told that they did not have proper documentation and would not be allowed to vote, they told reporters. (March 6)

More on the Quebec Niqkab woman.

Turns out CTV and CBC not surprisingly have sanitized this story quite a bit, omitting more onerous demands that men not face her etc. in the class. This women clearly went in with the intention of agitating and eventually going to the HRC. The plain fact is, this was tactical. The women never intended to go there to learn French, but to teach sharia for control and profit. Another thing that really annoys me about the Canadian attitude. In the CTV video below, you see some professional Canadian from some Multi-Culti board or another use the usual platitudes of compromise and balance. Utterly emetic.. To these spoiled civil servants, when a Muslim demands that all Jews in Canada be dead, they believe that it would be a satisfying decision just to make them all really really sick.

Thanks to our reader Kaffir_Kanuc for finding this Gazzette article:

An unidentifed woman wears a niqab. A judge's decision not to allow a woman to wear the Muslim head covering has sparked a legal and religious debate.More Images »

An unidentifed woman wears a niqab. A judge’s decision not to allow a woman to wear the Muslim head covering has sparked a legal and religious debate.

Photograph by: Phil Noble/Reuters, np

Quebec Immigration Minister Yolande James authorized the expulsion of a Muslim woman from a government-sponsored French class at Cégep St. Laurent, a report said Tuesday.

The student, an Egyptian who is a permanent resident of Canada and who wears a veil over her face known as a niqab, apparently refused to reveal her face in class and insisted male students not face her, according to La Presse.

The Cégep tried various ways to accommodate the woman between February and November 2009. But the situation became tense and created problems at the school.

Roger Giroux, the director of francization with the Quebec Department of Immigration, made several requests to the woman for her to remove the veil at the risk of being expelled. She refused and insisted that Giroux’s ultimatum be confirmed in writing. Giroux informed the woman in a letter that she was indeed required to remove her niqab in order to participate in the class, since part of the objective of the class is to encourage interaction with other students.

The woman was informed, however, that she could take the same class on the Internet.

The woman has since then apparently complained to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which will study the complaint in the coming months, La Presse said.

The woman initially agreed to remove her niqab when meeting with a female student advisor and when posing for her school ID card. She also agreed to receive some instruction without the niqab from a female teacher in an isolated area of the school.

The school’s accommodations extended to allowing the woman to give an oral presentation at the far end of the classroom facing away from other students. It became difficult to provide the woman with the instuction that is part of the curriculum, the La Presse report explained, because it involves teaching proper elocution and seeing how a person pronounces words in French.

The report notes that although there are regular requests for special accommodations in French classes for cultural reasons – some of which are deemed acceptable and some not – the cases rarely lead to expulsion. This was the only student expelled because of that among 39,000 students last year.
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Niqab+dispute+sparks+debate+over+right+veil/2633767/Student+expelled+wearing+niqab+report/2631626/story.html#ixzz0hCpQ0Bgu

Below, please find a nicely sanitized version from CTV news:

Same tactic tried in England:

interesting analysis:
thank you don’t bend over for allah

Canada: Muslim lauches complaint against Quebec school for non-compliance to sharia

From the CBC

Niqab-wearing woman pursues Quebec college

The niqab is a style of headwear that covers the whole body,  leaving only the eyes exposed.The niqab is a style of headwear that covers the whole body, leaving only the eyes exposed. (CBC)

Quebec’s Human Rights Commission is studying a complaint from a permanent resident expelled from a French college class last year after she refused to remove her niqab veil.

The Egyptian woman was enrolled in a language class for new immigrants at the CÉGEP St-Laurent in northwest Montreal when she was asked to remove the religious clothing.

She claims school officials violated her freedom of religion by requesting she not wear her modest dress, which covers the entire face and body and leaves only the eyes exposed.

The school says it tried to accommodate her on several occasions. Officials say she was not wearing her niqab veil when she applied for the program, nor when she met with school representatives for the first time prior to the 10-month course.

But when she showed up for class, she was wearing a niqab because of the presence of male students.

The school said the teacher allowed her to do her oral tests alone in a separate room, and present her assignments with her back turned to the class.

The teacher told her it was important when learning a new language to be able to see others’ faces.

The woman’s demands created tension in the class, school officials said.

“For the teacher it was more difficult to hear her, and it was more difficult for all the people to understand what she has to say,” said the school’s director, Paul-Émile Bourque.

But one Montrealer who wears a niqab said she doesn’t understand how it could be a problem in the classroom.

“I went through four years of university in engineering and I graduated with distinction,” said Afifa Naz. “It didn’t affect my grades. I participated in projects with my group and really I had no problems.”

But the government is sticking by its guns.

A spokesman for the province’s immigration minister says the woman could have stayed in the French class had she agreed to remove her niqab for certain exercises.

She claims school officials violated her freedom of religion by requesting she not wear her modest dress, which covers the entire face and body and leaves only the eyes exposed.

The school says it tried to accommodate her on several occasions. Officials say she was not wearing her niqab veil when she applied for the program, nor when she met with school representatives for the first time prior to the 10-month course.

But when she showed up for class, she was wearing a niqab because of the presence of male students.

The school said the teacher allowed her to do her oral tests alone in a separate room, and present her assignments with her back turned to the class.

The teacher told her it was important when learning a new language to be able to see others’ faces.

The woman’s demands created tension in the class, school officials said.

“For the teacher it was more difficult to hear her, and it was more difficult for all the people to understand what she has to say,” said the school’s director, Paul-Émile Bourque.

But one Montrealer who wears a niqab said she doesn’t understand how it could be a problem in the classroom.

“I went through four years of university in engineering and I graduated with distinction,” said Afifa Naz. “It didn’t affect my grades. I participated in projects with my group and really I had no problems.”

But the government is sticking by its guns.

A spokesman for the province’s immigration minister says the woman could have stayed in the French class had she agreed to remove her niqab for certain exercises.

How sexy; Politiken on it’s knees for Islam.

After a settlement to the Saudis, Middle Eastern and Australian Muslim groups, Politiken took a swipe at freedom in favour of sharia. “We apologize to anyone who was offended by our decision to reprint the cartoon drawing”. Although the paper stands by it’s decision to print what it wants, they are sorry for any hurt feelings. Islamist groups are thrilled and predictably the Oh I See welcomes the apology.

We should understand that pictures of Muhammed complimentary or not, were and still are, quite common and have not been met with very much if any incident, outside of the Jyllands-Posten episode. We also have to understand that within Islamic theology, the Quran can abrogate itself to suit it’s selected political purpose of the day. For a thorough understanding of such abrogation in Islam see here (second video) and here. Think of  it as an ‘in the heat of the moment’ or the ‘here and now’ doctrine, Muslim scripture in the ‘fast lane’. What better way to charge ahead against the ‘enemies of Islam’ than to conveniently abrogate the Quran to suit the present, chosen circumstance? Foolproof, I’d say.

” None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Sura 2. The Cow-Verse 106.

The picture above is an illustration of Muhammed. Greek, 19th century. It is currently housed in the Benaki Museum in Athens. What would the Imams say? Or what of this one below, used as an illustration advertising soup stock powder? Would it be permitted as long as the soup were made without pork?


1928 German advertisement for bouillon extract shows Gabriel guiding Mohammed up to Allah.

There are thousands of depictions of Muhammed old and new, created by artists around the world including ones created in Muslim nations. The claim that he cannot be depicted in picture form is clearly false.

From The Telegraph U.K.

Danish newspaper apologises over Prophet Mohammed cartoon

A Danish newspaper on Friday became the first in the country to apologise for offending Muslims by printing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with a bomb-shaped turban, rekindling a heated debate about free speech.

Published: 5:38PM GMT 26 Feb 2010

Politiken said its apology was part of a settlement with a Saudi lawyer representing eight Muslim groups in the Middle East and Australia.

The daily drew strong criticism from Danish media, which previously had stood united in rejecting calls to apologise for 12 cartoons that sparked fierce protests in the Muslim world four years ago. Continue Reading →

Dutch Labour party has some counting to do.

It would appear that some Islamic schools in Holland are using their multicultural right to educate children the old fashioned way. With a cane. Crosscream, One of Hollands national treasures, has translated this article from the Dutch press:

Parents report improper conduct


Getting beaten during quran school

By Eric de Brouwer and Gerda Frankenhuis, freely translated by Ahcim/Cross

Rotterdam This month a young child was physically abused during Koran lessons in the city of Rotterdam. The pupil was beaten with a stick by one of the employees of an Islamic school, the man who beat the child arranges the lessons outside official school hours.

Because of the incident in Rotterdam, the previous abuses that where discovered in a mosque school in Den Hague do not seem to be an independent affliction anymore. The parliament has assigned the GGD (concerns public and mental health) to do research on physical abuse in Quranic schools in the larger cities. Though the incident is over 1.5 months old, the incident has only recently been reported. The mayor and his assistance have given report of the incident after the VVD asked questions.

One of the spokespersons of the county of Rotterdam-city said that the beating did not happen during school, but was done by someone who was not an official teacher, but hired to give the children extra quranic lessons.

”The school leadership did well reporting this incident to the GGD” said the municipal spokesperson, ”the employee in question received a reprisal”. The GGD does not believe that the school was at fault, ”because they reported the incident” says Denis Wiering, team leader youthpolicy of the GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond.

The GGD passed the information on to the AMK (child abuse) of the bureau for youthcare. Chief executive officer René Meuwissen of the bureau for youthcare said, ”we have had talks concerning the incident, but as of yet the parents do not want to press charges”, the AMK did not do research on the child home situation because of yet there have been not any reported abuses within the family. The local Rotterdam-municipality alderman of education Lamers (Christiandemocrats), told use that he has not intention of banning schools of renting space to other organisations

* Take into account not all legal, judicial or political terms are translated correctly.

Illegal immigrants now have legal right to 100% of UK benifits

England, you once led the world in spreading reason and true liberalism. Now you are committing suicide as rapidly and dare I say it, ‘diversely’ as you possibly can.

Turkish father tells German court he stabbed daughter, 15, to death

Out of curiousity, if you were to stab someone in your home, how many times would you have to stab them before you recognized it was your own teenage daughter? One? Five? Sixty eight seems a little high to me.

Eeyore with a hat tip to R.E.A.L.

From Earth Times:

Schweinfurt, Germany – A Turkish doner kebab vendor told a German court Wednesday how he stabbed his teenaged daughter 68 times in their home, but he denied the attack was an honour killing. Prosecutors in the southern town of Schweinfurt have charged him with murder, alleging he killed Busra, 15, because she had a boyfriend, 17, and was a heavy user of her mobile phone and the internet.

But Mehmet O, aged 46, claimed he mistook her for a burglar.

“What I did was horrible,” the accused said in a statement read out for him by his lawyer. “What happened has nothing to do with family honour.” He claimed he heard a noise in the night last June, grabbed a kitchen knife, and attacked an intruder.

The girl’s bloodied body was found the next day on the sofa where she had slept. The accused vanished. When police caught him, he made a remark about his daughter “not choosing the Muslim way.” The court is expected to ask him what that meant. Continue Reading →

British Jihadis face prison time, home made video was evidence

Well, once again some British Jihadis made a video of themselves firing off guns and crawling around in the park and spliced in pictures of OBL and the usual Muslim imagery and ended up in a British jail. Here is a link to the original video, and below, my own treatment of it. Basically, it is just their video with some added images. I felt it needed the Vlad touch.

From The Times Online:

A home-made film showing two would-be terrorists on military-style manoeuvres crawling across a public park in Blackburn in broad daylight has been played to a jury at Manchester Crown Court.

Abbas Iqbal, 24, his brother Ilyas, 23 and Muhammad Ali Ahmad, a white Muslim convert, were said to be “intoxicated by the evil of terrorism” and planning to carry out jihad, or holy war.

The trio, who styled themselves “The Blackburn Resistance”, were said to have studied guerrilla warfare, gathered a stockpile of weapons and a library of jihadist material. Although some of material was comical, the prosecution has suggested, their purpose was wholly serious.

Edward Brown, QC, for the prosecution, suggested that Abbas Iqbal filmed his brother and Ahmad, 26, in the style of typical al-Qaeda propaganda. Their aim was to distribute the material abroad.

The video apparently shows one of the duo carrying a rifle as they “leopard crawl” through Corporation Park, in the centre of the Lancashire town.

Mr Brown said the “promotional collage” for The Blackburn Resistance was among material which Abbas Iqbal had intended to radicalise others.

The video was introduced by a voice stating “They are fighting against oppression, they are The Blackburn Resistance”, before it showed two of the group crawling through woodland and across a path in the park.

In the background, someone chants: “I am the armour for those who believe in the unity of Allah. I am the fire against the aggressor.

“I am the machinegun against the one who starts fighting. I am the one whose sun is shining. Over my day and my pride.” Video clips of the trio holding and firing weapons while shouting Allah Akbar (God is Great) in a back yard were also found on the storage card, along with photographs of them in camouflaged clothing and carrying weapons.

The Iqbal family home in Blackburn, was later searched. Police discovered a camcorder video tape which showed Abbas Iqbal holding a young boy and raising a machete.

Playing the tape in court, Mr Brown told the jury: “It is plainly a joke and he obviously has no intention of hurting the boy.” The boy, aged about eight, is on camera in a room with two girls as Abbas Iqbal holds the weapon and, in Urdu, says: “This is what I am going to do to somebody. God willing, when I find a Kuffar (non-believer), this I show, I am going to take his head off.” Mr Brown said that the material was discovered in Abbas’ suitcase when he was arrested at Manchester airport in August 2008, en route to northern Europe with another alleged extremist, who cannot be identified for legal reasons.

Later Mr Ahmad told police that the video was “just a bit of fun”.

For the rest of this article, please click here:

Islamic antisemitism on campus.

Here is a trailer for what looks like an interesting movie and project. Frankly, I think it’s too little too late. Universities are broken. The fact that Muslims have all the children and the oil revenues mean that university campus’s are demographically tilted towards brainwashed Muslims aided by self blinded leftists have pretty much set the agenda, and all pretence to scientific objectivity, or adjusting views post hoc to sit with the facts are gone. It’s about Marxism or some disguised version of it, and hatred of Israel.

Even so, I applaud the efforts of these people even if it is putting out the stable fire after the horses are all dead.

What is interesting, is how fast this video got views on youtube not to mention comments after I put it up. There is nothing like something which questions the demonization of Israel to get fast comments nd lots of views. A truly politically-incorrect point of view.

Meanwhile in the Islamic world, 12 year old boys are taught to cut the heads off of people who they don’t agree with religiously. Yet the political left in the west seem church-mouse quiet on that issue. Do not watch if you are sensitive at all. Do not watch if there are children present. Perhaps I should just advise you to, ‘do not watch’ the video below. However it is a stark contrast. Universities and leftists and Muslims siccesfully demonize Israel as an entity altogether, yet Islam is not taken to account for what you see below. This video is of a 12 year old boy cutting the head off of some captive. I suspect its a larger violation of the Geneva convention than… well any other one since Genghis Khan.