Muslims had nothing to do with Beslan massacre

_46302822_gym2Five years ago Muslim extremists invaded a school in Beslan, Russia. These Muslim terrorists held over a thousand people, most of them children, hostage. For three days these Muslim terrorists killed and tortured countless victims. The ways in which they were treated I will abbreviate . Children were shot for crying. Teachers and parents were shot for trying to calm the hostages. Young girls were gang raped. Young girls were raped with gun barrels and other objects. Many young girls did not survive these rapes. Children were forced to drink their own urine before being executed. The list of inhuman acts committed by these Muslim animals is as nothing I have ever heard before.

Now to the reason I have titled this “Muslims had nothing to do with Beslan massacre”.

Today I wanted to post something in the memory of the poor souls murdered in Beslan, so I started looking for a nice story already written and spell checked that I might copy and paste here. What I found disturbed me. Both BBC and SKY NEWS have stories about the five years after the event in Beslan. Neither story mentions Muslims or Islam. The British news is perverting history by not mentioning the identities of the attackers. It’s hard to believe that with Beslan on my mind today that I could find something in the news that would cause me disgust.

Muslims attempt to deny any connection between Jerusalem and Jews.

This is such an egregious lie it will likely work. Just FYI, the term ‘Wailing Wall’ was coined by Christians who saw the religious Jews dipping in prayer at the properly named ‘Western Wall’ of the original temple of the old testament and as it appeared to them as if they where crying and lamenting due to the dipping. bowing and praying, they called it the ‘Wailing Wall’ and it stuck. So its funny that these Muslims accuse the Jews of calling it that to somehow make it Jewish.
H/T GAR

US textbooks show Jesus was a palistinian and the USA was discovered by Muslims

History on Iran and Islam. Iran was amazing before Mohamed.

From American Thinker: H/T Proud Kaffir

“An early victim of these marauding conquerors was Persia – Iran — arguably one of the greatest civilizations known to humanity. It was the ancient Iranians who gave humanity its first charter of human rights, championed the ideals of tolerance, justice and autonomy of the diverse peoples in their vast empire. Islam systematically destroyed that civilization and, over time, tried its utmost to replace it with a way of thinking and behaving rooted in the tribal past. Millions of Iranians resisted the savagery and paid with their lives. Some were forced to live under jazyyeh — poll tax levied on non-Muslims.”

Islam’s Victimization of Iran

By Amil Imani

// ]]>
Some 1400 years ago, across the arid Arabian Peninsula roamed disparate savage tribes in a constant state of war with one another.  Acts of violence, pillage and slave trading were their way of life. Out of necessity and expediency, they refrained from active warfare for only one month a year-the month of Moharam (the forbidden month). Even during this lull in active warfare, the various tribes rearmed and prepared for the next eleven months of bloodletting. Violence of the worst kind and form was their way of life.
Although the ongoing warfare inflicted great suffering and death, it remained the major means of livelihood for the survivors in the harsh desert that sustained little other than the hardy goats, desert-suited camels and the indispensable vehicles of war-horses.
Violent death ruled. The victor had a reprieve for a time ‘til he became the victim.
Then there was a new summons. An orphan from the tribe of Quraish by the name of Muhammad, the son of the late Abdullah, offered the savages a deal they couldn’t refuse. He said that they should stop worshiping all the various idols in the idolatry of Mecca and turn to the one and only god, Allah, one of their numerous idols. He said it is Allah who is the creator of the universe and Allah has another world of immense bounty and pleasure. He promised the savages that by embracing Allah, banding together and carrying out his commands they assure themselves of great worldly spoils as well as eternal admission to a glorious paradise.
Muhammad promised further that instead of warring against one another, as they have done for millennia, for pittance of reward, they could venture out beyond the impoverished desert into a world of great wealth and bounties. Muhammad motivated his rapidly growing body of followers to rally around him by proclaiming, (1) if they are victorious they will have the treasures of the infidels as well as their women and children as slaves to hold or sell, (2) if the faithful kill the infidels in doing the work of Allah, further reward awaits them in paradise and, (3) in the unlikely event that they are killed, they find themselves in Allah’s glorious paradise for an eternal life of joy and bliss.
The outlandish, frequently confused and often contradictory incoherent rhetoric of Muhammad made the less gullible few question his sanity. They dismissed him as, “Insane Poet.” Yet, the generality of the savages found in him their savior — the one who would lead them to all the good in this world and the next. It was a win-win proposition for them. Win and you are rewarded handsomely, lose your life, and you go directly to heaven. How could they refuse? Continue Reading →

Muslims take credit for what they prevent, UN goes along with them.

Here is how typically and historically Islam works in terms of the field of human endeavour. First, Islam does everything it can to prevent advancement and works hard in fact for regression. Tactics include things like burning the library at Alexandria (Caliph Umar I) killing all the people who actually invent new medicines such as Jews and well, infidels and historically, robbing anyone traveling across their lands to get to new things and ideas.

No one seems to remember why in 1492 Columbus was willing to take such enormous risks to find a new sea route to India when Europe was already going back and forth through the middle east. It was far far less dangerous to risk men ships and resources on a harebrained idea that the world could be circumnavigated that way then lose yet another caravan to Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula.

When we did survive the trip back and forth to the Hindu’s and brought back useful things like the zero and a numbering set that made more sense than the Roman lettering one, Muslims took credit for their invention. Yes we call our numbers ‘Arabic Numerals’ because of an accident of geography. They are in fact Hindu as is the Zero.

More recently, Muslims take credit for modern microbiological advancements by claiming that Pfizer and other massive drug companies stole modern medicine from Sura’s in Islamic holy books, specifically the ones that refer to ‘dipping one wing of the fly that lands in your drink back into your drink then the other, because while one wing of the fly may have a disease the other wing will have the cure.’ I’m not making this up. Check the link. It has a video!

Today, the most barbaric force on earth, the one that does as much killing in a day as the KKK did in fifty years, the force that would have killed more than communism if it allowed for the technological growth to develop nuclear weapons (they are stealing that technology now though) and the group that threw out hundreds o thousands of Jews and attempts to eliminate all non Muslim from Muslim controlled lands, now has the utter temerity, the unmitigated gall to take credit for the UN’s refugee policies. A policy that Muslims take advantage of because of Islamic cruelty and western governments actually invented and offer to the Muslim world, the UN now agrees Muslims invented. Prepare yourself with an anti emetic for this:

UN: Islamic law is major influence on refugee law, says study

New York, 23 June (AKI) – The 1,400-year-old Islamic custom of welcoming people fleeing persecution has had more influence on modern international refugee law than any other traditional source, according to a new study sponsored by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

High Commissioner Antonio Guterres said that more than any other historical source, Islamic law and tradition underpin the modern-day legal framework on which UNHCR bases its global activities on behalf of the tens of millions of people forced from their homes around the world.

This includes the right of everyone to seek asylum as well as prohibitions against sending those needing protection back into danger, Guterres said in the foreword to “The Right to Asylum between Islamic Sharia and International Refugee Law: A Comparative Study.”

In the study, Professor Abu Al-Wafa, Dean of the Law Faculty at Cairo University, describes how Islamic law and tradition respects refugees, including non-Muslims; forbids forcing them to change their beliefs; avoids compromising their rights; seeks to reunite families; and guarantees the protection of their lives and property.

“The international community should value this 14-century-old tradition of generosity and hospitality and recognize its contributions to modern law,” wrote Guterres.

He said that “racism, xenophobia and populist fear-mongering manipulate public opinion and confuse refugees with illegal migrants and even terrorists.”

These attitudes have contributed to misperceptions about Islam, and Muslim refugees – who account for the majority – have paid the price, said Guterres.

“Let us be clear: refugees are not terrorists. They are first and foremost the victims of terrorism. This book reminds us of our duty to counter such attitudes.”

The study, published by UNHCR in cooperation with Naif Arab University and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, is scheduled to be launched on Tuesday at Naif Arab University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

H/T GAR

Rather pithy video showing Galloway’s true colors.

Loath as I am to give George Galloway any more publicity than he already has, I feel its important for the sake of turning even one useful idiot against him. When Galloway gave his teleconference in Ottawa Canada he had many useful idiot supporters, some of whom where wealthy over sixty Jewish women in fact, reveling in their rebelliousness. People who had become so consumed with hatred of Bush and all things American they blindly joined forces with all things against it. With elderly Jewish people, there is also the sense that because they appear to be acting against their own interests in an identity politics sort of way, there is a kind of sanctimony in it.

Specifically, if a Jewish person defends Israel’s existence he or she will likely be dismissed by the left, that is any one who has graduated from a western university in the past five years, as simply doing so out of self interest. So Jews who side with illiberal forces such as Galloway get to feel that they are intellectually superior.

They need to know one thing:

Defense of Israel should be done because it is right and just to do it. Because Israel has the best human rights record for all people, women, blacks whites and all religions in the middle east certainly and perhaps in the world. Because Israel has the same right to exist as any other nation on earth and perhaps much more depending on your criteria. It should not matter if you are Jewish or not when you argue the case if indeed you are interested in truth and justice.

In any case Galloway attracts a lot of these types. Perhaps if they all watched this video, one of them may come to understand that it takes more courage to stand up for the truth even when others will accuse you of defending your own interests when really, you are setting yourself up for hatred scorn and derision and very possibly personal danger.

One may notice, this is a common theme of history itself. The truth has always been unfashionable. More often a lethal liability.

Eeyore for Vlad:  (I can’t find the email from whoever sent me these excellent videos but thank you)

The Crusades, Spain and the Moors, truth and fiction.

ControlGFK thank you very much for sending me these videos. Your emails are much appreciated.
Jdamn thank you for making the vids into one play list.

I am a huge fan of Robert Spencer, an intelectual and a scholar who is meticulous and unimpeachable. Spencer and Christopher Hitchens are perhaps the two great intelectual giants of our day.

There are several good articles here on Vlad about the much misunderstood facts of the Crusades. Please use the search feature on the sidebar to check them. I believe they are well researched and worth reading and understanding. Its a true pleasure to have Spencer in video form adding to this cannon of information.

Please enjoy these videos detailing important facts of history which play heavily into modern policies.

Bridgitte Gabrielle on the Islamic war on history itself.

While these are shocking and unsubtle examples of the war on History which Muslims and Islam itself by nature are perpetrating on the ‘Dar Al Harb’ (World of war or non Muslim world) they are not the most serious. In Saudi Arabia and all Islamic lands, evidence of a pre-Islamic past is typically wiped out altogether. In Muslim controlled parts of Israel artifacts of ancient Judaism are looked for and destroyed for the same reasons Muslim armies burned the great libraries at Alexandria. This video illustrates why we have a ‘War on History’ category on Vladtepesblog. But it is not the most serious example.

History of modern India Occidental Soapbox #7

There are two people who I always look forward to seeing new videos from. Pat Condell and Occidental Soapbox. I was delighted this morning to find the latter had done another excellent and accurate video depicting bits of history of India and it’s relationship with Pakistan, the British empire and Islam that most simply do not know. Watch, be informed and enjoy!

Eeyore for Vlad

Queen’s medal of honour scrapped… because it’s too Christian for Muslims and Hindus

Nice to see England sweeping up the last remnants of it’s own history and culture. Now that it is an islamic state there is no point in the unnecessary expense of infidel rituals symbols and institutions. The British, ever fastidious in appearance are doing their usual good job of ridding themselves of what remains of their actual English heritage. The monarchy itself may be allowed to remain so long as the lineage changes. Perhaps the Saudis can spare a prince or two. Lots of room at Buckingham for a royal harem. Just so long as they know, Arab Muslims will never accept white people as equals if they memorize Koran and move right into mosques. A quick look at the Sudan or an examination of the Barbary wars should be sufficient evidence. But never mind carry on England.

Hamlet. Act V scene I

HAMLET
Ay, marry, why was he sent into England?

First Clown
Why, because he was mad: he shall recover his wits
there; or, if he do not, it’s no great matter there.

HAMLET
Why?

First Clown
‘Twill, a not be seen in him there; there the men
are as mad as he.

Eeyore for Vlad

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 10:38 AM on 08th May 2009 from The Daily Mail:

A medal established by the Queen is being withdrawn after it was declared unlawful and offensive to Muslims and Hindus.

The cross-shaped honour – The Trinity Cross of the Order of Trinity – has been handed to distinguished members of the former colony of Trinidad and Tobago.

Cricketers Brian Lara and Garfield Sobers are among those who have received the medal along with diplomats and politicians.

Trinity Cross
New Trinity Medal

The old Trinity Cross (left) is replaced with the Order of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, which has removed any Christian symbols

The Christian name and cross are now being replaced with the Order of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago – a circular medal featuring a sun, stars, water and a map of the islands.

The Privy Council, made up of 12 law lords, ruled the merit decoration was unlawful because it discriminates against non-Christians.

Now other honours are being reviewed over their references to Christian Saints or symbols. Continue Reading →

PJTV: Video on Hiroshima bombing and an answer to ‘historical relativists’

PJTV as usual did a stellar job of this. Many of you already knew all these facts, but to see them so well presented and in response directly to the kind of sloppy intellectual slight of hand so in fashion with America bashers is a breath of fresh air. Please take the 16 minutes to watch and if you have five dollars, go to Pajamas Media and contribute. They richly deserve our support as they have truly earned the money.
[kaltura-widget wid=”1nenu8vlns” width=”410″ height=”364″ type=”dark” addPermission=”3″ editPermission=”3″ /]

An interesting article on the original lyrics of the Star Spangled Banner

This post ripped verbatim from ibloga

The Star Spangled Banner Was Originally About Subduing Muslims In Battle


UPDATES AT BOTTOM OF POST

Well, what do you know. The original Star Spangled Banner was about victory in the War against the Barbary Pirates (read Muslims).

From Her Royal Whyness (with special thanks to Democracy Broadcasting):


Earlier today, I viewed a video lecture

(also forwarded link to you –  subject: Arabs and Zionists’ tug-og-war over America since 1776 – Professor Michael Oren video)


given by historian and author
Dr. Michael Oren, here .

Quote from the end of the lecture (he’s a real tease, that one) :


“Why the original lyrics of the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ talked about Muslims bowing down to the victorious flag of the United States.”


Well, it turns out the Star Spangled Banner was originally written for Bainbridge and Stephen Decatur in 1805.


In it, the lyrics included phrases:

“turbaned heads bowed”
“for the brow of the brave”
“In vain frowned the desert,”
“To a far distant shore, to the battle’s wild roar, ”
“And pale beamed the crescent, its splendor obscured ”
“By the light of the star-spangled flag of our nation.”


The lyrics changed in the War of 1812.

Continue Reading →