On this anniversary of the 911 jihad attacks against the United States, and the Twin Towers as a symbol of Western economic strength, it is worth contemplating how much Islam has gained since the attacks. The CBC attempting to block any reporter from calling 911 a “terrorist attack” at all, let alone Islamic Jihad should be an indicator. That and an avowed communist-jihadi as mayor of New York.
Something worth thinking about for a few minutes today.
Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.
ADDENDUM:
This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.
Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)
We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary
or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.
Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.
This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.
Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.
Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.
This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.
Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.
Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.
Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.
That is dialectics.

When my youngest son was 17 he told me he wanted to get the SHOT. This was in 2021. He had just found his first girlfriend, and to date her, her parents insisted he get it. I paid (donated to his favorite charity) $1200 for a 15-minute conversation with a rebel doctor who tried to rationally convince him not to take it. He took it anyway. Luckily, whatever they shot into his arm was from a harmless batch, or had not been sufficiently frozen so has not resulted in injury thus far.
Of course, the girlfriend is now history. Imagine, though, the reframing of those parents’ demand through my eyes; “…to date our daughter you will take this experimental injection, suffer any possible health consequences, or else you must disappear from her life.” Both parents were federal government employees. Nuff said.
Some day my headstone should say simply, “I tried”.
When my friend’s wife was placed in the psyche ward in 2021 the doctors gave her at least one covid injection despite the fact she could not have possibly provided legal informed consent, because she was not legally of sound mind. They did not consult with him before they did this, so he couldn’t even try to prevent this on his wife’s behalf. Shortly thereafter she got turbo breast cancer.
My point is that there is a constellation of angles through which to view the impact of the state experiment that was the covid-19 injection program. I refer to it as an experiment very loosely. I cannot know the true motives, but do know that a line of state action will not be squandered on a single purpose. Most likely big pharma money was the other propellant to this horror, but most of us know this.
The other thing we know for certain is that the authorities were aware of the damaging side effects of these mRNA injections before they mandated them. This is a crime against humanity.
Still, the majority of the injected “defend their purchase” only because they have the luxury of sufficient health to do so. Those who have been hurt badly enough no longer give a damn about defending their purchase, because the cost obliterated the veneer of that vanity.
The culprits must be brought to justice. These stories coming from Parliament Hill are heartbreaking. Trudeau and Carney should be brought in shackles and forced to listen to these statements.
https://youtu.be/TwXrn2QYrqU?si=Z8ug0N4hOOFcSOqp
Before they face punishment, Because they KNEW.
https://rumble.com/v7fbos2-interview-dr.-james-thorpe-at-allison-inquiry.-sept-9-2026.html