Category Archives: UN HRC

Hillel Neuer talk in Montreal, Friday December 6th 2024: Exposing the mass narrative attack against Israel and Jews

Posted on by

On Friday, Hillel Neuer of UN Watch came to speak to a small, but interesting group of academics and students in Montreal about the facts on the ground concerning the UN, Mass line narrative attacks against Israel, and a detailed expose of some of the UN principle people along with organizations who are clearly operating by Marxist beliefs and intentions, as well as in method. They are operating dialectically instead of any kind of procedures Westerners would consider an attempt at truth or understanding.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent write up. And for those who wish to send this talk to their associates, who may not be ready for how this site sees things, I recommend sending the RAIR link to them.

In terms of how we do see things, and how they dovetail with Hillel’s talk, there are two main points he raised which nearly rocked me back out of my chair.

  1. Hillel’s pointing out intersectional lines of action, using Genocide accusations against Israel to negate the value of the Holocaust as a deterrent for antisemitism and specifically to allow it to become mainstream again
  2. That the anti Israel messaging by media and in the streets by Muslims and leftists, is every bit as much of a mass line narrative attack as is global warming and the vaxx and covid, the religion of peace. etc. etc.

First, the presentation:

Here is the bit that caught my attention especially:

Below is one of the slides from Stephen’s presentation with us a few weeks ago. It is one of the most impactful from my particular understanding.

At the simplest level, you have the method of attack, or the ‘oppressed group’ to be used as an attack vector on the bottom half of the wheel, and the thing being attacked, an attribute of Western civilization at the top half. These are called, “Intersectional lines of attack.” And after watching Hillel’s presentation, we could add accuse Israel of Genocide on the bottom of the wheel with a new line to the top which says taboo on antisemitism.

Stephen’s recent interview/briefing below:

So the punch line is that the accusations of an Israeli genocide against the Palestinians is exactly the same tactic derived from the same strategy as: Global Warming, The Vaxx, Covid lockdowns, and every other mass line narrative attack we face all the time now. All meant to be destructive, and all being very effective at it.

Anyone interested in seeing Hillel’s Herculean efforts at the United nations should search YouTube for UN Watch, or Hillel Neuer.

The UN is the COMINTERN: Three kinds of attacks on the West by the UN

Posted on by

The problem with being too far ahead of the curve is that you sound crazy. The fact is, the UN has been nothing but a communist plot against the world for a long time now. To be frank, I think someone needs to rewrite the whole Chicken Little story from a much more sympathetic angle. Except that by the time people realized he was right, its too late to fix it by easy means, isn’t it?

From a few days ago: On UNDRIP:

I need to go through some of the material above in greater detail to be sure this is the case. But at one point the claim is made that this will allow any Amer-Indian band to lay claim to any land that they claim to have ever used. This is eerily similar to the Islamic central dogma that any land ever conquered by Islam and ruled under sharia law, is permanently Islamic territory, and it is justified to take it from any non-Muslim who may live there not under Islamic rule.

The following is from several years ago: Pay special attention to this one. It points out the Secretary General of the UN is a life long leader of communist organizations. In this speech he explains how he intends to end freedom of speech.

2018: The following two videos are about how the UN intends to both end the nation state as a system of organizing humanity though the cultural, historical and regional interests of the people in them, but also how the UN has passed a “compact” which if not made into laws in the member states, has clearly been obeyed through other forms of pressure to only report on mass migration as a good thing, if reported at all.

Here, rebellious members of the EU, a more local branch office of the COMINTERN discuss the 2018 UN migration compact and its meaning and implications:

Only one reporter bothered to report on the compact in an honest way that we could find:

This is very important. So here in this one post, you see the UN attack on: Free Speech, property ownership and the nation state through mass migration, even if they use the now familiar language of victimhood to sell these attacks.

Three videos from the past dozen years or so, that reveal what the UN really is, and what they really plan to do to its member states

Posted on by

Like the EU and other supranational organizations, their current intention, if not at founding but now certainly, is to dissolve the polities that make up their constituency and remake them as all one thing under their rule. If one could come up with a Latin phrase for that, it might be solve et coagula. 

Below are three videos that I hope will convince the reader that this is the case. None of these are exactly opinion videos. One is the head of the UN himself explaining how freedom of speech must be eliminated world wide. The other two deal with a motion passed by the UN to which all left-leaning Western nations, which is damn nearly all of them, conformed. Once you see them, you will recognize the effects of the UN migration compact in our own immigration policies, and how they are reported on.

This first one is a dissident group within the EU trying to stop the UN Global Compact on Migration. It is accurately described. Notice how he describes what we know to be the Discourse Theory method of criminalizing opposition to the consensus view, in this case on dialectic negation of local populations through mass migration.

Below, the ONE report I have ever seen that was an honest report at the UN about what that body had passed:

This last one is the head of the UN himself. A life long communist. He explains how he is going to negate all freedom of speech world wide. I post this one from time to time, so if you have seen it before, you are forgiven if you skip this one.

Two news items on the ironically named, ‘United Nations’

Posted on by

1. This is wonderfully consistent with other groups they have on the UN Human Rights panel like Iran and Saudi Arabia

2. And in order for them to continue doing such a wonderful job as they do now, they want all nations to be tithed to them at least to the tune of 10%.

Measures to cope with coronavirus impacts

•    Global actions must include a stimulus package reaching double-digit percentage points of the world’s GDP, with explicit actions to boost the economies of developing countries.•    Regional mobilization must examine impacts, monetary coordination, fiscal and social measures, while engaging with private financial sector to support businesses and addressing structural challenges.

•    National solidarity needs to prioritize social cohesion and provide fiscal stimulus for the most vulnerable along with support to small- and medium-sized enterprises, decent work and education.

And for anyone who has forgotten, or has not yet seen this, here is the Secretary General of the UN explaining how its critical that all people of the world lose any freedom of speech that contradicts the Marxist narrative:

There is a video of this same Marxist explaining how the UN has to replace self governance for our own sake of course. But it’s long. Perhaps a day must be taken to dissect it and upload it with the proper references.

The whole video is below. It is just under 16 minutes.

 

A quick reminder of how and why the UN acts

Posted on by

Saudi Arabia covets the presidency of the Council for Human Rights

Posted on by

An original translation by Oz-Rita with much thanks!

From TDG.Ch

Embarrassment among diplomats, fear and anger among NGOs. The Saudis want to chair the Council for Human Rights.

It all began with a rumor that has spread and reached the corridors of the Palais des Nations. Saudi Arabia covets the presidency of the Council for Human Rights impossible — unimaginable. However, this rumor is no longer a rumor. Faisal bin Hassan Trad, the Permanent Representative of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations, in Geneva since January 2014, is indeed campaigning in the Asian group to be its candidate for the renewal, which will take place by the end of the year.

Currently, the Council is chaired by the German Joachim Ruecker, whose qualities and commitment are unanimously lauded. Before him, it was an African, the Gabonese Nganella Baudelaire, who was not well-remembered among the NGOs, who were frustrated by his year as president.

The rotation rule requires that the next president of the Council of Human Rights come from the Asian group comprised of thirteen countries (Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, China, UAE, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Maldives, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Qatar and Vietnam). Faisal bin Hassan Trad has a very good chance, and the battle promises to be close. The Europeans will all try to dissuade members of the Asia Group from this choice, considered in advance as disastrous for the IMAGE of the Council for Human Rights. [emphasis added]

Arm-twisting by the Saudis

Saudi Arabia is twisting the arms of these other countries to be designated. If they succeed, it will be a disaster for the Council of Human Rights. “This could send us back to the worst times of the former commission who had sunk into disrepute,” says a Western diplomat on condition of anonymity. Continue Reading →