Studies on mask use and Covid suppressed while some areas double down on forced masking OUTDOORS

1. Danish study shows that masks do not do what we are forced to believe they do

Delingpole: Why Won’t Top Medical Journals Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study?

Do masks protect against Chinese coronavirus and reduce its spread — or are they, as their critics maintain, mere empty gesture politics?

A major study which might finally have answered this question has been postponed indefinitely after three of the world’s top three medical journals mysteriously declined to publish it.

The researchers behind a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask are having great difficulty in getting their research results published. One of the participating professors in the study admits that the still secret research result could be perceived as ‘controversial’.

For weeks, the media and researchers around the world have been waiting with increasing impatience for the publication of a large Danish study on the effect – or lack thereof – of wearing a mask in a public space during the corona pandemic.

Now one of the researchers who has been involved in the study has said that the finished research result has been rejected by at least three of the world’s leading medical journals.

These include the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA.

“They all said no,” says the Chief Physician in the Research Department at North Zealand Hospital, Professor Christian Torp-Pedersen.

However, the Professor does not wish to disclose the journals’ reasoning.

Let us all remember that the New England Journal of Medicine AND The Lancet knowingly published fake ‘studies’ on the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine for the purpose of discrediting that treatment, not to inform the public. The studies were so badly faked that enough scientists screamed loudly forcing retractions. But no policy changes came making the treatment available. The fact that these journals did not accept these studies at this stage makes it reasonable to think that the Danish study is well done, but contradicts the narrative, or more accurately, the “consensus” (political position taken by a small group to be imposed on a large group which usually imposes a pseudo reality at the expense of actual reality) and therefore must not be stamped with the rapidly diminishing credibility of these once great publications. Hopefully like their fellow Danish scientists who discovered through rigorous application of the scientific method that the Earth’s climate is driven by the sun, and that CO2 levels FOLLOW temperature changes and not the other way around, these Danes will also go straight to the public with a film.

To prove a point, the German Government in a fully Orwellian way, is now sending the police forth in the streets of Frankfurt to announce that masks are mandatory for all OUTSIDE now. Which adds a lot of weight to the theory directly above:

Translation below:

“To all pedestrians on Schweizer Strasse,
Due to the increasing corona numbers, the city of Frankfurt has decided in a general decree that in every shopping street as well as (every?) Schweizer street, mouth and nose covers are to be worn on the street to protect everyone at all times. Put on a mouth and nose cover, otherwise you may be fined.”

So there you have it. Germany is making mask wearing mandatory OUTSIDE on the basis of ‘cases’ almost certainly from increased testing and not serious illness, even as evidence mounts that masks may not do what we are told they do.

Meanwhile, as Christmas Markets in Germany likely fold, some effort is being made to make masks more festive at the expense of, well an actual festival. What we need are masks that say, “This is s token of communist control”

 

German epidemiologist makes video for Hungary on the science of a vaccine for Covid 19

Could any medical or science people please weigh in? Readers of this site might remember that this was one of the very first detractors from the narrative on the Wuhan Flu and we posted his early videos here. Oz-Rita who sent in the video below, tells us that this particular video gets removed from Youtube within hours of an upload.

Cloth masks, THIRTEEN TIMES more likely to cause infection in wearer

1. The science, and the science of the studies, on mask use to prevent. Wuhan Flu transmission. (Long but really good)

Mask Facts: The Science & History Of Masks In Medicine from Shawn Model on Vimeo.

The psychology of wearing masks: (Short but very satisfying)

 

Thanks to all who sent in links and tweets to these two videos.

 

A few minutes before and after yesterday’s perfect space launch

When America, and the West needed a win more than ever, a NASA-Space X joint venture was a massive success. For a feel good few minutes, enjoy this launch into orbit of America’s first homemade spacecraft since before Obama retasked NASA to be a Muslim outreach organization.

Shortly after they cut away from the astronauts, the head of NASA talked about President Trump’s presence at the event. It was so refreshing to hear something positive about the president in this video. Sadly, I stopped recording before they got to that part. But one of the main points was that President Trump had taken quite a risk to attend this event. Had the launch failed or worse, scorn would be heaped upon President Trump like fertilizer to a mushroom farm. The success of course, would not be credited to him. So it’s a no win. But he went anyway. The sign of a man who operates on principle instead of optics.

Perhaps if time permits that segment can be located and added to this post.

Meanwhile, a reminder of the Obama legacy of NASA and space travel.

 

A few items on the Wuhan Flu and vaccines

The following story is from a reader at Vlad who wishes to remain anonymous, but has a story which very much is in sync with the 60 Minutes piece posted yesterday and posted here again below her email:


Also might be a good idea to dig up the story bout the guy who invented vaccination in the first place.
He noticed that milk maids did not get smallpox.  They got cowpox, a mild thing, and then smallpox did not infect them.
So, he bought a 5 year old boy and infected him with some of the fluid from a cow pox pustule and after a bit, infected him smallpox.
He traveled the country with the boy and publicly vaccinated him over and over to sell his vaccine (called vaccine because of the cow pox origin).
The boy died in his teens.
Now to my story.
When my older son was born, I wanted to be the best parent I could be.  That meant, of course, that I followed the vaccination schedule very rigorously.  My son was healthy, strong, big and very bright.
After he got his MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) vaccine, he got a little sick – but that is to be expected:  a vaccine must make you a little sick in order to evoke the required immune system response.  He got better fast.
A few days later, we noticed that sometimes, he looked cross-eyed:  but only sometimes.  The next time we saw a doctor, we asked that he take a peek.  Turns out, my son cannot move his left eye to his left.  That is, his eye has full range of motion from the middle (straight ahead) to the right side of his eye, but cannot move it past straight ahead to his left side.
Our family doctor said it was a textbook example of vaccine damage and that there is no way to fix it.
I was devastated:  Here, I thought I was doing the right thing for my son, and now I have permanently damaged him!  He will have double vision his whole life.
The next bit surprised me:  I asked what documentation he needs from me – the pictures, videos of him before and after the vaccine was administered, demonstrating that it is not a pre-existing condition…and the doctor said:  ‘Nothing, I am not allowed to report vaccine damage.’
I was shocked and he looked exasperated.  He told me that when he had accurately reported Vaccine damage in the past, he got a warning that if he reports more than 3 vaccine damages in one year in his family practice, the Ontario Medical Association will strip him of his license to practice.
So I thought I should sue the vaccine maker myself.  And the doctor said that no MD will go to court to testify about vaccine damage.  They are that afraid to say anything.  The best he could do was give me a medical certificate that he is exempt from vaccines on medical grounds.  Which he did.
But that is not all.

I went to the CDC website to read up on this and found out that they recommend that people with immune system disorders or diseases and their close blood relatives should not be vaccinated because the danger of vaccine damage is dangerously high. Examples included allergies to peanuts and eggs as well as asthma and lupus.

That’s me.   Well, I should have checked earlier…
Don’t bother looking at the CDC site now:  when President Bush Sr. said that in case of a bio-warfare  attack or a pandemic, he will make vaccination mandatory for everyone, that statemement was disappeared from the CDC website!

Once again, politics over-rules the science!
But it gets ‘better’.  The last time I went for an annual physical exam, the MD recommended that I get a pneumonia vaccine, because my diseased immune system makes me vulnerable, and all the vulnerable people must be vaccinated first…  because this is what they are teaching in Medical schools now.

Anon for VladTepesBlog

And now, a Nobel Prize winner in Medicine discusses the Wuhan Flu/Covid19 virus

The 60 Minutes episode from the 1970s that ties in to the personal story above:

Could SARS CoV-2 be a bioweapon?

This is a Sticky Post for a while. Its importance also merits a little more time at the top we think. Please scroll down for newer posts for now. Thank you.

A Ph.D in biology familiar to the authors at VladTepesBlog, took the time and effort to really look at some of the available documents on the nature of the Wuhan strains of the Corona virus now shutting down the world.

There are a number of anomalies that differentiate it from all other strains of Corona which deserve a closer look. One of which, and one of several, is the insertion of segments of the HIV virus which is not found in any other strain of Corona anywhere. But there is much more to cause concern and raise suspicion that this is really a WMD bioweapon from the Communist Chinese government.

Below, the executive summary of this Dr.’s investigation.

A summary of some of the research papers used to write this summary can be downloaded here.

could SARS CoV-2 be a bioweapon?

Dr. Anon Ph.D.

On January 31st, Indian scientists (Pradhan et al.) posted on a research website a not-yet-peer-reviewed paper called “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag.” They looked at the genomes of all of the versions of the new coronavirus now known as SARS CoV-2 that were available at the time (there were 28) and also the genomes of all coronaviruses whose genome sequences were published in databases (there were 55). The different versions of the SARS CoV-2 virus differ in generally less than a dozen nucleic acids in its approximately 30,000-nucleic acid genome. Such mutations are typical of viruses. Pradhan et al. found the most closely related virus to be the SARS CoV virus that caused the 2002-03 pandemic.

They then also closely compared the spike protein of the new virus with that of SARS CoV and generated a three-dimensional structure of the spike protein of the new virus. They found that all 28 strains of the new virus contained four insertions of amino acids that were not present in SARS CoV. They named the insertions insertion 1, 2, 3, and 4. They also looked for the insertions in all of the other 55 coronaviruses and did not find them. One other group (Zhou et al.) had reported three insertions but those authors had not looked at the entire sequence of the spike protein.

Looking for where the insertions might have come from, Pradhan et al. used the nucleic acid sequence of each insert as a “query” of all available viral sequences found in databases. They found that each of the four inserts aligned with short segments of the HIV-1 virus. Inserts 1, 2, and 3 aligned with parts of the HIV-1 gp120 protein and insert 4 aligned with a short segment of the HIV-1 Gag protein. Inserts 1 and 2 were both six amino acids long had 100% sequence homology with the corresponding segments in HIV. Insert 3 was twelve amino acids long and aligned with a 15-amino acid segment in gp120 if one left a 3-amino acid gap in insert 3. Insert 4 was eight amino acids long and aligned with a sequence in the HIV Gag protein if one left a gap of 11 amino acids between the first four and the last four amino acids in the coronavirus sequence. [Using the one-letter abbreviationsfor amino acids, the amino acid sequence of insert 4 is QTNSPRRA, and is located in positions 677 to 684 of the spike protein.]

The authors thought it was unusual to find short stretches of amino acids in unrelated proteins and expressed the opinion that it was unlikely the inserts were there by chance. When they modelled the structure based on the available structure of the SARS CoV spike protein they found that the first three inserts folded together to constitute part of the binding site that recognizes the host receptor. Insert 4 was located at the junction of the S1 and S2 subunits of the spike protein. (When the virus binds to the host cell, its spike protein S is cleaved by proteases on the host cell into subunits S1 and S2. S1 is needed for binding to the receptor and S2 is involved in fusing the virus membrane with the cell membrane.)

Pradhan et al. also thought that the insertions would provide additional flexibility to the glycoprotein binding site by forming a hydrophilic loop that may facilitate or enhance virus-host interactions. (The spike protein is a glycoprotein, meaning there are sugar groups attached to it.)

Pradhan et al. (2020) withdrew their paper within days of prepublication after it was criticized for methodological reasons.

Continue Reading →

Segment of debate with Muslim Brotherhood “Islamophobia” march leader, and proper French journalist

Thank you Ava for doing this. I know how mad it made me to watch this. So I can barely imagine how angry it made you to actually translate this.

German Parliament applies Frankfurt School tactics to discredit actual science

This is a stunning example of Alynski’s rule 13, (Don’t attack the idea, attack the person) and Habermas’ force a consensus and then accuse all who speak outside of the consensus of hate speech. In this case, the extent to which they had to stretch to discredit solid science, from an exceptionally qualified scientist, resembles what was done to Bilyana Martinovski by the Swedish Police.

Thank you Miss Piggy for what was an enormous task translating this video.

Please watch to the end. This is an important video.

Direct link

Another thing. Miss Piggy who translated this, said that the strident annoying German voice over did not translate everything that was said.

In the original video the translation voice was very loud. So annoying and so occulting of the original that I wondered if they tried to hide his statements.

In the version above I used EQ to make his voice more audible and you can actually follow his English without blowing an ear drum. Miss Piggy did get all he said. But remember that the local audience did not get his complete segments from the German translation, which you can hear at this link.