As usual, when the government speaks of diversity it means uniformity and when it speaks of fairness it means fascism.
Category Archives: Western Hypocrisy
BNP vindicated by BBC documentary on rape and forced prostitution of British children by Muslims
Say what you want about the BNP. I’ll even listen with a sympathetic ear. There may even be a smattering of truth to some of the worst allegations against them. But let’s be perfectly clear here. The BNP have NOT been making wild public statements about killing all the Jews or any group at all like for instance, oh I dunno the president of Iran for example. The BNP has NOT threatened to nuke a civilized nation because it contains a group he doesn’t like as has, well for instance the president of Iran.
Yet it was that same president of Iran who was asked to deliver the annual Christmas message to the people of England by the BBC instead of the Queen in 2008 and the BNP who are being charged with hate crimes, accused of racism and maligned without any hard proof and certainly no national televised speeches with the leader demanding nuclear annihilation of a friendly state.
So I think for the moment Ill pitch in with the BNP. Sooner or later one has to trust the evidence over allegations.
Dutch TV deliberatly sets out to make Muslims look like victims. Producer fired for manipulation
HAT TIP JDAMN, Found on Bare Naked Islam
A DOMESTIC violence charity is planning to use human rights legislation to sue Greater Manchester Police and the Crown Prosecution Service after a young mother was murdered by her violent husband.
Taxi driver Malik Mannan, 36, stabbed his wife Sabina Akhtar, 26, to death at their home in Longsight.
He was found guilty of murder by a jury who deliberated for 20 minutes – one of the quickest murder trial guilty verdicts in Greater Manchester’s legal history – and jailed for a minimum of 17 years.
It emerged that Sabina told police Mannan had attacked her 25 times previously – and even predicted he would kill her. But prosecutors decided not to press charges, leaving him free to murder.
Today the charity Refuge said it would argue that GMP and the CPS failed to protect Sabina.
Human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy QC said the legal action could become a landmark test case and Sabina’s family told the M.E.N. today that they would back the action ‘100 per cent’.
Sandra Horley, chief executive of Refuge, said: “Under human rights legislation, the authorities have a duty to protect persons and we believed in this case the police and CPS failed spectacularly and if they had handled it better she might still be alive today. I believe the only way to change policy and practice is to hit them where it hurts – in their wallets.”
Sabina’s family believe she would still be alive today if police and prosecutors had listened to her cries for help.
Sabina reported Mannan’s attacks and death threats months before her murder in September last year. Continue Reading →
British hospital bans paintings of churches.
Please England give up the charade. You are a Muslim nation now. Stop pretending you are a secular state which allows freedom and liberal values but are retending to reasonable accomodation to Islam. You shame yourself twice by pretending.
The hospital that banned paintings of churches
By Lucy Ballinger
Last updated at 2:43 AM on 05th May 2009
It was supposed to be a kind gesture to brighten up a hospital for patients.
But a council managed to enrage local artists when it asked them to contribute their paintings to hang in wards.
In an unsolicited letter, Havering council in East London made it clear it would accept pictures of any subject – except churches.
St Paul’s Cathedral: Images of this iconic London church would not have been permitted at the Queen’s Hospital at Romford
The explanation given was that the hospital had to be ‘mindful of all religious denominations’.
Many artists could not understand why images of Christian buildings were banned, but those of other religions were welcome.
Jo Delaney, the council’s arts development officer wrote to art groups in Havering about hanging paintings in Queen’s Hospital, Romford.
She wrote: ‘Whilst the building is spacious, it has many plain black walls which are crying out to be brightened up!
‘The matron of patient environment is keen for local artists to use the space as a gallery.
‘The hospital has asked artists not to submit paintings of churches as they have to be mindful of all religious denominations.’
Artist Roy Storey said that when he phoned the council to complain he was told it was the matron’s decision if she did not want pictures of churches.
Local painter Beryl O’Brien, 71, said: ‘There are so many religious beliefs, why would they pick on churches?
‘What about synagogues? A painting is a good picture because it is a good composition, not because of the religion.
‘It seems ridiculous to try to be so inclusive, and by doing that exclude people who are tolerant to some extent.’
Mrs O’Brien said the hospital had tainted what was a ‘lovely idea’. She did not know anyone who had submitted a painting yet.
A Havering council spokesman said the terms of the initiative were set by the hospital and the council had only been asked to pass on the information.
A spokesman for Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS trust said its director of nursing had no knowledge of the letter’s content and therefore it had no comment.
West Bank: Death Penalty for Land Sale to Jews
We have blogged this earlier on Vlad but since the New York Times decided to bother to notice it, that it qualifies as ‘news that’s fit to print’ I thought we would re post it here. But here is the question I have to ask:
If a Palestinian gets the death penalty for selling land to a Jew, how is it that Israel is called an apartheid state by the left and Islam worldwide?
A Palestinian court sentenced a man to death on Tuesday for selling land in the West Bank to Israelis. The court in Hebron sentenced the man, Anwat Breghit, 59, to death by hanging after finding him guilty of treason and of “selling Palestinian land to Israelis.” The indictment says he sold property in the village of Beit Omar to Israelis from the Jewish settlement of Karmei Tzur. The sentence requires the approval of President Mahmoud Abbas in order to be carried out.
Labour candidate ‘too white and Jewish’ for office.
I guess that’s justice for representing a party that has inundated Britain with immigrants and coddles the Muslim vote as if the very life of the party depended on it. [They are not far off on that one though.]
From Mail Online April 28-2009
The Labour Party has become embroiled in a race row after a prospective female councillor was allegedly told she was ‘too white and Jewish’ to be selected.
Elaina Cohen claims that Labour councillor Mahmood Hussain said he would not support her application for an inner-city ward because ‘my Muslim members don’t want you because you are Jewish’.
Mrs Cohen, 50, has made an official complaint about the alleged remarks made by Mr Hussain, a Muslim and former lord mayor of Birmingham.
She said: ‘I am shocked and upset that a member of the Labour Party in this day and age could even think something like that, let alone say it.
‘People should not be allowed to make racist comments like that. If someone in the party feels I cannot represent them because of my colour or religion, that’s ridiculous.
‘I felt particularly aggrieved because I have worked across all sections of the community, particularly with the Muslim section, and have been on official visits to Pakistan.’
Mrs Cohen had applied to stand as a Labour councillor for the Birmingham ward of East Handsworth and Lozells, which has a high Asian and Afro-Caribbean population.
As one of Labour’s safest seats on Tory-led Birmingham city council, the final candidate would be almost certain of victory at the June 4 by-election.
But when Mrs Cohen telephoned 57-year-old Mr Hussain for his support, she was astonished to be told that she was too ‘white and Jewish’ to be considered.
Lorraine Briscoe, who runs a local community association, was sitting next to Mrs Cohen when the conversation took place on speakerphone last Tuesday.
‘I was disgusted that a councillor could make comments like that in 2009,’ she said.
‘He told her, “They will not vote for someone who is white and Jewish. My Muslim members don’t want you because you are Jewish”.
‘Elaina then asked him if he had talked to his Muslim members about it and he said, “I don’t want to talk about it with you” and hung up.
‘Elaina does a lot of good work in this community and she does not see race or religion, she just sees people.’
Two days after the alleged conversation, Mrs Cohen and another candidate were rejected by a pre-selection panel after failing to gain the support of the local party.
Instead, members were presented with one candidate, black South African Hendrina Quinnen, who was selected by an almost unanimous vote.
Mrs Cohen has now sent an official complaint to Labour Party general secretary Ray Collins and Birmingham city council accusing Mr Hussain of improper conduct.
Mr Hussain said yesterday: ‘I would not make those sort of comments. The allegations are not true.’
Fjordman: Why we need Germany
From the desk of Fjordman on Mon, 2009-04-27 21:34
I’m tired of people who are busy losing this world war because they are still obsessed with the previous one, which ended generations ago. Anti-Nazism has mutated into a permanent witch-hunt on an imaginary enemy. The notion that “neo-Nazis” constitute a prominent group today is nonsense. The most dangerous people by far are those running the European Union, who are busy dismantling European civilization and enlarging the borders of the EU to include the Middle East and North Africa, thus flooding their own countries with tens of millions of Muslims and other hostile aliens without consulting the native population. This makes the EU the largest criminal entity on the planet, preoccupied with destroying an entire continent, dismantling the greatest civilization that has ever existed and replacing the native population with others. I have described this in my book Defeating Eurabia, which is available online.
The French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut thinks that “Europe does not love itself.” He says that it’s not forces from outside that are threatening Europe as much as the voluntary renunciation of European identity, its wish of freeing itself from its own history and traditions, only replaced by human rights. The EU isn’t just post-national; it’s post-European.
Next to the EU, the most dangerous people are the Leftists all over the Western world who are waging a Jihad to destroy their own civilization and have teamed up with Muslims to achieve this goal. Unlike neo-Nazis, these people are not only far more numerous but socially accepted and disproportionately represented in the media and the education system, where they systematically silence “racist” dissenters by destroying their livelihoods and reputations. They use an imaginary “far-Right” threat to crush people they don’t like.
According to Dr Aidan Rankin, “anti-Fascism” is the new Fascism. The so-called anti-racists and Multiculturalists are aggressors with totalitarian leanings; the people they unfairly attack are victims of a failed social experiment and one of the greatest betrayals in history:
“Progressives (as they invariably call themselves) use accusations of racism and fascism as excuses to bully and oppress impoverished white communities and isolate them in racially based ghettos. For white liberals, anti-racism becomes a form of auto-racism, directed at members of their own race who are deemed to be socially inferior. It is, in other words, a new type of snobbery and social exclusion […]. Their ideology allows for no concern for individuals, except for attack or denunciation. This contempt for the individual, the white, male worker in particular, allows the anti-fascist to reconcile two contradictory demands – for civil disobedience (including violence) and for the massive extension of state power […]. [They operate] by appealing to more basic psychological impulses of fear, envy and hatred. Anti-fascism shares with its alleged opposite a belief in the cleansing or redemptive power of violence. They share as well an obsessive preoccupation with race.”
A supposedly “tolerant” nation such as Britain is becoming more and more totalitarian the more “diverse” it gets, and I sometimes suspect that was the whole point. The fact that prominent groups can despise Christianity, destroy free speech, practice widespread censorship and ideological indoctrination, hate capitalism, promote the concept of the all-encompassing state and support other known Nazi policies while denouncing their opponents as “Nazis” only demonstrates that most people no longer understand the real nature of Nazism. “Discrimination” doesn’t necessarily lead to gas chambers. We discriminated quite sensibly in the past against allowing Muslims and other obviously hostile groups to settle in our lands. I would feel quite comfortable with re-instituting that kind of “discrimination.”
Continue Reading →
UAE secret torture tape. This is from ABC news but still very harsh
Here is a video from ABC news about how a crown prince of the United Arab Emirates tortured a grain merchant for apparently failing to deliver the full quota. This is an important video at this time as the world contemplates and condemns the US for state sanctioned torture of some Islamic terrorists and Obama’s publishing certain top secret CIA files on the matter. It’s worth comparing the nature of the torture done, the reasons for which it is done and the degree of certainty of the guilt of the recipient.
For the ABC story please click here. There is also more of the raw footage of the torture tape available here. Not for the weak of heart. Get an Imodium ready before you slick that second link. It’s noteworthy that the Royal prince’s brother was the director of this torture and uniformed police where the ones administering it. Clearly, the UAE is not the paragon of an enlightened Islamic state many of us thought it to be.
Islam in America, Part Six: Education. By Kathy Shaidle
from Right Side News April 7, 2009
Did you know that Muslims discovered America? Or that “ancient Jewish civilization contributed very little to the arts and sciences”?
According to a recent study by Institute for Jewish and Community Research, millions of American public school students in all 50 states use textbooks that contain such erroneous “facts.” Of the 500 historical errors uncovered by the study, hundreds of them tout a blatant agenda of Islamic superiority.
Even more shockingly, U.S. taxpayers are the ones footing the bill. It’s all part of a worrisome trend within the American educational system: the apparent spread of radical Muslim propaganda under the guise of “education.”
Pamela Geller has reported on the story for years. She says that the influence of radical Islam spreads beyond K-12 into colleges and universities.
“No one knows how extensive Saudi funding of U.S. schools is,” Geller told RightSideNews, “but since Saudis control 80% of US mosques financially, it’s very likely that they control the same percentage of schools.”
She cites “$20 million dollar gifts from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, to top U.S. universities like Harvard and Georgetown,” adding that the impact of such gifts flows all the way “down to the kindergarten level.”
Under Title VI of the 1965 Higher Education Act, Harvard and seventeen other universities only qualify for special funding provided they conduct “outreach” to K-12 teachers, helping them shape lesson plans. And naturally, those lesson plans include laudatory information about Islam and the Middle East…
In one notorious instance, outraged parents protested in 2002 when they discovered that their children were learning about Islam in a California public school by praying “in the name of Allah.” Continue Reading →
Kathy Shaidle, Ezra Levant, Salim Mansur speak in London on the HRC’s brilliantly
Kathy is insightful, funny and lucid speaking in London Ontario April 13th 2009 but most of all, deadly accurate. I hope everyone watches this entertaining and important speech. Not to take away anything from the other equally excellent speakers.
Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete? Part 1: Intro & Kathy Shaidle from josephinejosephine on Vimeo.
Below, part two. With Salim Mansur and Ezra Levant
Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete? Part 2: Salim Mansur and Ezra Levant from josephinejosephine on Vimeo.
Questions and answers:
Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete? Part 3: Audience Q&A from josephinejosephine on Vimeo.
Bus driver fired in Niqab passenger controversy
What was this driver thinking. Everyone knows that the laws the rest of us obey do not apply to Muslims. Sheesh, when we we ever learn?
the Copenhagen Post April 14-2009
Union to challenge dismissal of bus driver fired in Funen case of niqab wearing passenger
A 41-year-old bus driver who made headlines two weeks ago after refusing to let a woman wearing a niqab onto his bus was fired on Tuesday by his employer, Fynbus.
According to the bus driver, the woman showed him a monthly pass, which has a photograph of the pass holder on it. When he asked her to lower her veil so he could be certain she was the woman pictured on the pass, she refused, whereupon he told her she could not ride on the bus.
The woman attempted to re-enter the bus four times and was removed on each occasion.
The driver’s labour union, 3F, indicated that they believed the firing to be a political statement and are therefore challenging the dismissal.
Excellent analysis on Galloway and the Canadian debacle. Terry Glavin
This post ripped from this blog. Please visit the original source here.This analysis is excellent and the author Terry Glavin deserves full kudos for figuring it all out where so many failed.
This Is Not A Story About Free Speech. This Is Not A Story About National Security.
(UPDATE: The full half-hour CHQR World Tonight radio interview version of this post’s contents is here).
In his contribution to the cacophony about L’affaire Galloway, Christopher Hitchens is not wrong in the substance of the opinions he expresses here. It is just that they are wholly immaterial to the matter at hand. Hitchens is wholly wrong in his assumptions. He didn’t do a lick of homework. He fails, and fails utterly.
(UPDATE II: Appended to his Slate column today, Christopher writes: In my last column, it seems I may have done an injustice to the government and people of Canada in the matter of George Galloway’s canceled visit to that country. For elucidation, please consult the following blog post. For my part, let me say it was not so much that Hitchens didn’t do a lick of homework, but that the references he relied upon – Canada’s national newspapers – are what led him astray).
The pretended difficulties that the fascist thug George Galloway has encountered in making his Canadian appointments are of his own construction and design. This has nothing to do with Geert Wilders, Skokie, or Jean Marie Le Pen. It certainly not about “the risk of giving the power of censorship to any official.” It is not really a story about Canada’s national security, either. None of these things are at stake here, any more than it was ever going to matter who won or lost when Galloway’s Canadian friends launched a court case to try and get Galloway in, the roundabout way.
This is a media circus of the same sort as the midway freak shows that involve displays of Britney Spears as she’s caught driving her SUV with a suckling infant on her lap, or Amy Winehouse snorting coke in a leaked home video. Dress it up anyway you like, that is the function the Galloway rumpus-making serves the news media.
Best Geert Wilders speech yet! L.A. April 2009
White House seeks to control the Internet
Once again, in the interest of national security, a western democratic government seeks to restrict the freedoms of it’s citizens. Unwilling to address the radical message and teachings of the Qu’ran they seek instead to punish the masses with Orwellian laws. Are our governments so weak that they fear offending those who wish us harm? Are our citizens so weak that they stand by and obey Big Brother? Both seem to be the case.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin
Proposed new powers called ‘drastic federal intervention’
A pair of bills introduced in the U.S. Senate would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private online data, regulate the cybersecurity industry and even shut down Internet traffic during a declared “cyber emergency.”
Senate bills No. 773 and 778, introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., are both part of what’s being called the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, which would create a new Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor, reportable directly to the president and charged with defending the country from cyber attack.
A working draft of the legislation obtained by an Internet privacy group also spells out plans to grant the Secretary of Commerce access to all privately owned information networks deemed to be critical to the nation’s infrastructure “without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy restricting such access.” Continue Reading →