Ezra Levant notes the unprecedented use of irrelevant victim impact statements in the Tamara/Chris sentencing hearings

We have provided evidence over the last several years which is at least indicative, if not conclusive that there was a communist revolution which has taken place across the West, and especially the Anglosphere since around 2015. This really manifested in 2020 though with the Covid Line of Operation.

Secondly, communism is not what it sells itself as. It is not a system intended to be more “fair” as any citizen of a Western Republic/’democracy’ would think of the word. But one where all meaningful terms are redefined, especially fair, and reality itself is determined by the state.

Ezra Levant’s report on how the prosecution is handling the hearings for Chris and Tamara do nothing to mitigate these suppositions. Although the hearing for Helen Grus is frankly astonishing in its deployment of a procedure intended to create a political outcome and not determine the truth of the matter.

Here is a short segment of Helen’s Lawyer, Bathsheeba speaking on some of the irregularities of that hearing:

The trial of Helen Grus was a hearing, not quote a criminal trial. but the basic procedure was, and is the same. The appearance is supposed to be a process of determining guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is the presumption of innocence, and that the political consequences to the verdict have no bearing on the outcome. 20 years ago or more, this was basically, not always true, but basically true. When a trial was political, there was a stink about it. Movies got made about it. Appeals were launched.

Increasingly, it appears that any trial, hearing, internal board discussion such as the ‘College of Surgeons and Physicians” that has a political consequence, specifically where the real question is one of defying state diktats with zero consideration as to what is good for the patient, or what is actually true, or what fits the law as it was; all these processes are not the opposite of what they were designed to be.

In other words, none of this is hypocrisy. It is in fact a new modus. A new set of desired outcomes and processes, and for different reasons that have nothing to do with truth in any socratic sense. It does make sense when you understand what it actually is.

And if we expect to have any hope in actually fighting it, we have to start by understanding what it actually is.

ADDENDUM:

This feels like a data point worthy of a red letter addition to this post.

One of the lawyers connected to the Freedom Convoy had her bank account shut down, in what has come to be known as, “Debanking” in Canada where any counter-revolutionary with any authority or just who comes to the attention of someone in the new communist government(s) in Canada will force an end to your relationship with your bank, 100% for political reasons. This will include your mortgage if you have one with that bank.

From the Western Standard:

Royal Bank of Canada shuts down Freedom Convoy lawyer’s accounts over ‘risk concerns’

Eva Chipiuk, a lawyer known for her involvement in the Freedom Convoy and vocal criticism of Canadian institutions, has been blindsided after the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) terminated its banking relationship with her, citing risk-related concerns.

According to an official letter the banking institution sent to Chipiuk, her “recent activity was outside of RBC’s client risk appetite,” and it would “no longer be in a position to continue serving her.”

This is of course the kind of careful language used to disguise a real purpose with one that the public can accept without too much fuss. “Outside the risk appetite”, to mean that the consequences by the COMINTERN to the bank, or its proxies like ANTIFA etc. are more than the bank can handle.

Please see this article and video for another stunning example of Debanking someone with a counter-revolutionary view

ADDENDUM II:

There was no trial/sentencing hearing today. The sentence will be delivered in November of this year.

A few thoughts on Ezra, the revolution, and antisemitism as a kind of beard for anti-westernism

Across the Anglosphere, our entire system of governance and law has been replaced. Cancelled. Aufhaben der Kultur. The revolution is so advanced, that it is now turning from covert, to overt as defined and strategized by the Maoist insurgency model. (Much more on that later this week!)

In the following post there will be several examples of what appear to be, and clearly are antisemitic actions in the West enforced by the state. But that is a surface level look at the events and will serve to make us unwitting assistants in the revolution itself. The issue is not “Jews”, although it certainly will feel and seem that way to Jewish people. The issue is the total replacement of rule of law, which means equality before the law for all. It means the police do not enforce the law, but assist those who defacto make the law. Specifically the Communist and Islamic mobs.

The covert explanation is to keep the peace. Prevent people from being hurt or whatnot. As we saw with Ezra yesterday and frankly, as we have seen with primarily peaceful Jewish groups for around 20 years now, when they demonstrate for peace in Israel or anything which is counter to Islamic-Communist supremacy, they are arrested or cancelled and not the violent, baying and threatening mobs of Muslims and leftists.

The early examples have been documented on this site, and are pretty much all in Europe till the last few years.

Increasingly though, this effort is more and more overt. Police treat Islamic mobs with such deference that they don’ even pretend they have to adhere to any Western laws. This is no accident, or even point of practical necessity. After all, they were brought into the West to do exactly what they are doing. There is no other possible explanation for the massive set of lies and destruction of laws and rights to bring in millions who have no legal basis for immigration, fund them, put them in hotels and feed them, and even, and this cannot be emphasized enough, put an Italian secretary of the Interior on criminal charges for KIDNAPPING because he refused to let a boatload of illegal, male, fighting age men from Africa and the Maghreb, disembark in Italy. This was his job. Not that it should matter at all, but to emphasize the point, Spain and other leftist nations had offered them a port. But Salvini’s actual job was to protect the borders, whether the invaders had other options or not.

The same thing was done to Trump when he started in on the Wall on the Southern border. They tried to claim he was guilty of misusing funds raised for the border wall if memory serves. Same basic con. Use the machinery of enforcement of the law, investigation of crimes and even the judicial system into weapons of the revolution, so to those who will not see, it looks like it was justice.

The post below claims that the uniformed man is explaining to the Muslims that if they have weapons, they should leave them at the mosques. This is in the UK. We know what happens to British people who merely mention there is an issue with Muslims and migrants. Imagine if they were armed in any way.

Again, this is not two tiered policing. This is the result of a revolution in which the culture, laws and systems of governance have been replaced.

It’s a new system of governance which people are not permitted to know about officially, and worse, and are not allowing themselves to see.

The enforcement is so consistent across the board that it is clear the UK is a communist state where Muslims have special law-free status as enforcers of the revolution against classical British people. It doesn’t matter what police may think who may happen to read this. Many may feel that they are in a position where they are only doing what is possible for them to do, to try and avoid people being killed in some situations. The issue is why are the police in that situation, and who put them there?

Why have the police never been in this position before? Why is the law a hammer from Thor when it’s conservatives peacefully protesting genuine illegality by the state such as the Freedom Convoy?

Using the Freedom Convoy as an example, we know for a fact the state has the tools and resources to control these lawless mobs of jihadis.

We have also seen over the last 15 years, a massive reequipping of the police with quasi military gear. In fact a kind of hybridization of police with military in some ways. Police now have at their disposal military tech ranging from small armoured street tanks to full auto rifles, things which police never had in a free society not that long ago. So who exactly are these tools to be used against, since they are not in use against these howling threatening mobs?

https://twitter.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1861000871162589497

The kippah, is clearly a symbol of Jewish observance. More importantly though, it is a sign of the counter-revolution. A refusal to abandon one’s identity. And likely support for a nation-state that is the outpost of Western civilization in a land-sea of barbarism and Sharia law. It is just as likely that a person wearing a Trump hat would be treated the same way. In fact it is likely they wouldn’t get the courtesy of a warning from the police. They would likely just be attacked in some way and to some degree by the mobs.

As an aside, I went to film a pro-Israel demo on parliament hill some months ago. Likely the one the two Muslims have been arrested for planning to bomb, and saw a man with this kippah on. He let me photograph the kippah, but even he, at an event for Israel and well protected, was not comfortable being photographed with it on his head. This of course, is the symbol for Emmanuel Goldstein at its core. Both Jewish and the symbol globally for the counter-revolution.

Reading the Jewish man’s Tweet, we get the same reasoning now common as an excuse for the total abrogation of our individual rights.. The police, for his own protection, warns, moves or arrests a man for his own good. It actually is of secondary importance that he is Jewish. Jews are the canary in the coal mine, (as they so often are historically) but the effort is every bit as much against all non-communists and groups associated with resistance to the revolution as Jews. Just one target at a time.

Once they make the Jews afraid to show who they are in public, once they destroy the nation-state of Israel, the same tactics will be used against all groups they view as an impediment to the revolution.

And it is worth mentioning that all groups are an impediment to the revolution. The example we cite here so often, because its such a fun one, but a hundred thousand times not the only one, is how J. K. Rowlings was cancelled for not going along with the trans dialectic. And she was a major leftist and feminist up to that point. But Jewish people are likely the prime starting point because they won’t fight back in the way certain other groups more likely will. They have been negated already in terms of protected status and now face less protection than other citizens. That became clear when the government media complex lied by omission and deception on stories of attacks on Jewish schools in Toronto.

What few networks who covered the attacks did not mention in one case that it was a Jewish school that had been hit with an arson attack, or that the school buses which had been burned past repair had Hebrew writing and was used by the Jewish school. They instead made a loose association with some business nearby as if that was the actual target or trigger for the attack.

Culturally, Jews are solidly in the rule of law, and Western ethos paradigm, dependant somewhat on sect and of course, the individual.

Here is the Police Chief of Ottawa, Steve Bell, explaining to Canadians how if you participated in a peaceful and legal protest, you would be utterly screwed over by the state using means never before deployed. Debanking, frozen bank accounts etc. and against the law abiding. This would be 2022.

If these tools are being used against the Communists and Muslims who are throwing objects at police while threatening to destroy Canada, we are unaware of it.

We are aware of when they are not though. Even though pointing it out can get you much more time in jail than repeated gang rape of a minor.

Speaking of Ezra, here is a tweet about his arrest the other day. Members of his organization are arrested routinely. Usually for doing what all journalists should do, but do not. Occasionally his journalists are physically attacked. One could argue about the wisdom of The Rebels’ tactics in the practical if you like, but not the rightness or legality of them ever. But this arrest was special. A police officer, who was enforcing mob rule of a Muslim communist gang of Bolsheviks and jihadis, for the safety of everyone else you understand, declared himself “the law”. Much as Anthony Fauci declared himself to be science not that long ago. Ezra reminded him that he was a servant of the law, and not the law itself.

This article argues both of them are wrong. Ezra’s view is the de jure one, and a vestigial one at that. The policeman, overly comfortable with his monopoly on use of force and being fully cognizant that Rule of Law no longer applies and he is to do whatever he has to or can do, to stop people from being injured at these events (short of actually enforcing the law against the violent and threatening mob) in a Jewish neighbourhood in Toronto yesterday.

Here is the text of Ezra’s tweet on the matter:

@ezralevant
I was arrested two hours ago, handcuffed, searched and jailed for “causing a disturbance”.

I was just released moments ago.

I wasn’t causing a disturbance — I was standing by myself on a public sidewalk, silently filming a grotesque pro-Hamas mannequin in a Jewish neighbourhood — a reenactment of Hamas leader Yayha Sinwar. It would be like someone reenacting Hitler — and police were stopping me from filming it.

I was pushed away from it by one officer. And another officer, named Macduff, said if I didn’t go to a special “free speech zone” they’d set up far away, I’d be arrested. I told him Canada was my free speech zone, I was a citizen and taxpayer, and I would not get off the sidewalk.

Macduff said that was causing a reaction. I said the hysterical reaction of foreign thugs who hate Jews (and most other Canadians) doesn’t give them a veto over my Charter rights.

Macduff said he “was the law”. I told him no, he was a servant of the law. So he arrested me and had me taken to jail. I was just released and I’ll have more to say — including in a lawsuit against Macduff and
@TorontoPolice
for violating my rights and refusing to protect me. Go to http://SaveEzra.com for more updates, and to help. (Thanks.)

The following video is just under 8 minutes. But the key part begins at about 1:58

If I am understanding this right, the state created a small barricaded “free speech zone” within which one could not be part of the revolutionary antisemitic mob and be safe. This is the de facto Canada. Where revolutionaries can say and pretty much do what they want free of fear for the most part and people who believe in rule of law are pretty restricted.

As we have said before, we have sympathy for the police in most cases. They are in fact putting themselves in harms way to prevent injury or worse between opposing groups. The blame lies higher up. With the people who brought the Muslim in to Western nations to do exactly what they are doing, and funded the universities to manufacture Marxist radicals who are true believers in a Hegelian pseudo-reality over any kind of practical reality-based state within which people can seek truth and make their own decisions, for better or for worse, based on their own understanding of the universe.

 

 

Ezra Levant a victim of the real state of communism in Canada

This is my talk in Pembroke in August, attempting to explain how our various institutions of state actually work:

Ezra wins the Tweet of the day

More from the Director of the CDC. Only because people now try to claim “they never said it would block transmission, only that it would stop severe outcomes”. It doesn’t do that either. It may do the opposite.

Tucker Carlson segment on April 12, 2022: Trudeau’s communism now extends to licensing journalists

Anyone who remembers Canada before it was communist should probably write down all those memoirs on paper and bury them somewhere safe.

Full show:

Please watch the opener for the show. The look at Twitter and Elon Musk is very important and well done.

Worthy Ezra Levant thread

Many important observations in this series of tweets

ONTARIANS: Know your rights with the new mask “laws”

 

Related: Ontario lawyer files lawsuit against feds, province & CBC over Covid-19 measures & masks

Rocco Galati recently discussed the upcoming lawsuit against members of the Canadian Government, the CBC, as well as the topic of mandatory masking. Galati is a constitutional lawyer in Ontario and has been practising law for 31 years, he began his career with the federal department of justice.

During a July 17 interview with Amanda Forbes he said he has filed a constitutional challenge in the Ontario Superior Court on behalf of his clients seeking declatory and injunctive relief against Covid19 measures.

Galati said that both the federal as well as provincial governments have “effectively dispensed with parliament and are ruling by royal decree as it were which is unconstitutional.” He is especially concerned about Ontario’s Bill 195 in which the government can implement executive orders on an ongoing basis with the extension of emergency measures possible for years to come. Galati said this is “unheard of.”