Obama advisor refers to Jerusalem as “Al-Quds” but thats not the worst

We are so fucked:

A friend of mine pointed out that I neglected to say who this was and what the circumstances of this speech are.
Here is who from Israelmatzav

Here’s Obama anti-terrorism czar John Brennan speaking about the beauty of Islam. Listen carefully. At the 1:33 mark, while he’s speaking in Arabic, he refers to Jerusalem as ‘al-Quds’ (which gets translated as Jerusalem) and at the 2:39 mark, he refers to meeting people from the non-existent country of ‘Palestine.’ At the end, he refers to loving al-Quds/Jerusalem.

Still working on where and why.

Facebook caves to Islam

Facebook Submits to Islam: Censors and Destroys “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day” Page
We’ve been promoting it. Pakistan flipped out over it and banned Facebook, YouTube, Wikipedia, and Flickr. Now Facebook has decided to submit to Islam and censor a page, or better yet,  a community of nearly 80,000 fans and over 6,000 photos uploaded…..  The Dhimmis who run Facebook are making the Islamists proud.

At the current moment, when clicking on the link for the “Everybody Draw Mohammad” page, it just takes us to the Facebook home page.  That means Facebook has removed the content.  However, Facebook is known for both its glitchiness and its indecisiveness in these matters.  They used to deactivate and reactivate the founder of the JIDF twice a month for about a year, before they finally made up their minds.  Thus, there is a slight chance that the page could magically crop up again.  Let us know if it does.

please click here for the rest of this story:

****   Everybody Draw Mo FB page/group is now up again a/0 9:07 AM  *****

(comment)

Islam, rape and Norway

Here is a post from Gates of Vienna that needs to be read to get a proper context for the video that Vlad subtitled and posted here about a week or so ago.

From Gates of Vienna:

This story is a year old, but it’s still important and relevant to what we discuss here every day.

In 2009 the Oslo police reported that rape statistics for the past three years showed that none of the rapes in the city were committed by native Norwegians — all were committed by immigrants. The video below is from a report aired on a Norwegian TV news program. Many thanks to TTL for the translation

Our Norwegian correspondent Zylark has translated a contemporaneous newspaper article. Zylark adds these observations:

The article is a good one, but it’s a bit misleading. It states non-Western immigrants are behind all assault rapes, which is true enough, but it is not quite exact. What it should say is: immigrants from Muslim countries are behind all assault rapes.

I dislike the tendency for the mainstream press to lump all non-Western immigrants into one big sack. Non-Westerners from non-Muslim countries integrate perfectly well into our societies. They have their quirks and culture, and that is fine. Quite exciting actually, rather enjoy it. They are decent people, unlike many of the Muslims, who are not.

I would love it if the press managed to grow the [manly equipment] to make that distinction. But I guess it would be racist to say that Indian Hindus are no problem, but Pakistani Muslims are. Never mind that they are essentially the same, ethnically speaking. Only the creed differs.

Below is Zylark’s translation of the article from Dagbladet:

Immigrants behind all reported assault rapes in Oslo

For the last three years according to the police.

All 41 reported assault rapes in Oslo for the last three years were committed by non-Western immigrants, according to the police.

“The perps are relatively young men who come from other countries. They are often asylum-seekers and often from traumatized countries or countries with an entirely different view on women than we have here in Norway,” says Hanne Kristin Rohde, leader of the violence and vice section at the Oslo precinct to NRK [Norwegian Broadcasting Company].

She says the perps are either traumatized or psychologically damaged, or from countries where violence towards women is ordinary.

Brute violence

Men with Kurdish or African background dominate the statistics.

None of the reports involves ethnic Norwegians.

What distinguish the assault rapes are threats or use of brute violence.

– – – – – – – – –

The police think more preventative measures towards men of immigrant background are needed.

[Yes, a course is needed, where one need to tell people rape is wrong. *Sigh*. — translator]

Ole Morten Lyng with the Nordbybråten asylum-reception center agrees.

He emphasizes that nothing can excuse such actions, but that it is important to understand the situation the assailants are in, in order to prevent such incidents in the future.

“Politicians are afraid”

The leader of the resource center for immigrant and refugee women, Fakhra Salimi, passes the ball to the politicians.

She claims preventative work amongst men with minority background is entirely lacking, and says the politicians are afraid to tackle the problem. Continue Reading →

Apparent Selective Application Of The Law In The United Kingdom

Aenaes over at ICLA did this post on selective enforcement in England, which for all practical purposes, makes it a Muslim country. Selective enforcement of the law, is perhaps the most pernicious form of deployment of tyranny. First, pass into law, a bunch of really really bad ideas that people accept because if they are enforced accross the board they are at least, equally unfair to all, and then only apply those laws to the people who you want to eliminate. This, is what Western nations are doing accross the board against secularists, Christians and Jews, and frankly all non-Muslims, perhaps even more so in Canada than in England as we saw in the case of the Montreal imam and Point De Bascule

Eeyore for Vlad:

Some Muslims appear to think that they can do just about anything in the name of their so-called god, and the British authorities seem all too willing to go along with them. The following video outlines an incident that illustrates this point rather well. The video relates to a group of Muslims going round an area putting stickers on people’s houses. The video is entitled ‘You can’t scare me into silence’:


Christians have been challenged by police when they have been handing out leaflets in so-called ‘Muslim areas’ of the United Kingdom, even though they were not defacing private property as those Muslims in the video were alleged to be doing. I would imagine that atheists would treated in the same way if they tried to encourage Muslims to leave their precious religion. Surely Muslims deserve to be made aware of the alternatives to their religion. Perhaps their lives would be improved if they ceased bowing to Allah. There seems to be a tendency in the United Kingdom to prevent people discussing the awkward truths associated with the Islamic religion. This tendency is totally inconsistent with the established customs of freedom and openness that traditionally characterise British society.

The footage also touches on the issue of Muslims apparently making false allegations and using the gullibility of politically correct authorities to intimidate non-Muslims further. Laws such as the Racial and Religious Hatred Act seem to be tools that some in the Muslim community use to intimidate non-Muslims. It also seems that this Act is mainly used in a highly selective way against white people. Since these laws do not seem to be applied evenly they should be repealed as a matter of urgency. After all, the new LibCon Government claims to be opposed to the police state that was built up by the previous Labour administration and as such should dismantle that particular part of it.

If the EDL Dudley ‘Rooftop Two’ can be tazered and locked up for practicing freedom of expression, why are Muslims allowed to deface people’s houses and intimidate them and not be subject to similar treatment. Why are the Muslim perpetrators of the incident mentioned in this video still at liberty and walking the streets? It is not acceptable for the authorities to treat Muslims more favorably than everyone else just because of a perception that Muslim communities may riot or that ‘community cohesion’ may be adversely affected. It seems that the politically correct authorities in the United Kingdom are becoming no different from sharia enforces, the sort of people who send school girls back into burning buildings because they are not properly dressed.

Interview with Lars Vilks on the arson attack on his home

Here is the first interview I am aware of, with Lars Vilks on the attack on his home with incendiary devices.  Translation was www.snaphanen.dk with help from Gates of Vienna

You need to install or upgrade Flash Player to view this content, install or upgrade by clicking here.


Here is an older video of an Al Queda threat on Lars Vilks.
H/T Miss Trixie

comment from a youtuber:

alJizzerror has made a comment on Lars Wilks speaks on the arson attack on his home today:

Lars Vilks drew a cartoon of a dog with Muhammad’s head. This cartoon was extremely offensive to dogs. Dogs are far too intelligent to associate with the pervert Muhammad or believe in Jizzlam. But dogs did not bite Lars Vilks because they understand that he was exercising his right of free speech. No dogs attacked Lars Vilks because they are more enlightened and civilized than the Muslims who want to kill him.

ARSON ATTACK ON LARS VILKS

Arson attack on Lars Vilks
Last night attackers tried to burn Muhammad cartoonist’s house down
COPENHAGEN May 15 2010
By Uwe Max Jensen, Sappho.dk
During the night of May 15 unknown perpetrators smashed a window in Lars Vilks’ house in Scania, Sweden, poured gasoline into the bouilding and proceeded to set fire to it.

By coincidence the artist spent the night with his girlfriend and escaped with his life.

After being alerted by the Swedish police, Vilks has returned to his house, where Sappho.dk contacted him at noon today.

“The place is swarming with police and I can talk no further right now,” Vilks told Sappho’s reporter. In the background one can hear policemen talking to each other.

Sappho is following the case and will soon have a man on the spot in Scania.

Lars Vilks’ blog is up and running again after being hacked following Islamicist attacks on him at Uppsala University last Tuesday.

In a comment to this latest attempt on Vilks’ life, the President of the Free Press Society Lars Hedegaard expresses his astonishment.

“How was possible for these murderers to gain access to Vilks’ house only a few days after a mob assaulted him at Uppsala University? What are the Swedish police and political class up to? As far as I know not a single Swedish politician has had a word to say about the attack in Uppsala. Is the truth that Swedish power-holders prefer to see Vilks killed in order to send a message to other critics of the Swedish multicultural idyll?”

“Now is the time to demonstrate practical solidarity. We can all do that by purchasing the drawing his would-be murderers are so angry about,” says Lars Hedegaard.

*****  UPDATE  *****

In Swedish, google translate makes some sense of it:

From The Montreal Gazette:

UPDATE from The Local.se

Arson attack on Muhammad artist’s home

Published: 15 May 10 17:39 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/26662/20100515/

Dictionary tool Double click on a word to get a translation

Police have launched an investigation into arson after the home in southern Sweden of controversial artist Lars Vilks sustained fire damage on Friday night.

Vilks was not at his home in Nyhamnsläge at the time of the attack. An acquaintance of the artist discovered the damage on Saturday morning. Windows had been smashed, there was minor fire damage to the front of the house and plastic bottles filled with petrol were found inside the property, local newspaper Helsingborgs Dagblad reports.

Police said the house was empty and the fire had dissipated of its own accord. A forensic examination was carried out on Saturday morning.

“We’ve launched a preliminary investigation into arson,” police spokeswoman Sofie Österheim told news agency TT.

The embattled artist, who was physically attacked at a lecture theatre in Uppsala earlier in the week, said he was now considering moving from his home.

“I don’t think I can live here full time. It’s obvious this is a high risk area. I guess I’ll just be here at certain times,” Vilks told TT.

The artist left the house at 10.30pm on Friday and was not aware of the damage until the morning.

“It wasn’t all that bad from a purely material perspective. They’ve broken window panes and set fire to a curtain by sticking a hand through a window,” said Vilks.

“It’s not so pleasant but I’ve become hardened. I get threats all the time but it’s hard to assess what’s behind it.”

In this case, Vilks believed the perpetrators were amateurs.

“These are the kind of people who drive off with some petrol and try to start a fire. But one thing can lead to another.”

Vilks has had a $100,000 bounty on his head from an Al-Qaeda-linked group since the publication of his drawing of the Muslim prophet Muhammad as a dog in 2007.

TT/The Local (ne**@******al.se/08 656 6518)

A report from the civil war in England

I don’t know what to make of this guy. Don’t know if he is on the level or what. But based on daily reports I see in the British MSM, some fraction of which we post here on Vlad, I have no reason to doubt the veracity of this report.

Ok some of the mystery of this has been explained to me by a sharp youtube user I speak with occasionally, who goes by dontbendoverforallah. Apparently, there is a campaign by some Muslim organization which is against democracy, and plasters areas including people’s private doors and property, with stickers telling Muslims not to vote. As an additional thought, I would say that is this is done in areas which have a certain percentage of Muslims, its also a method of ethnic cleansing of the non-Muslims.

Here is a link to the page of the group doing the stickering and about which, the person in this video is discussing.

From that website:

One of the main excuses some people use today in attempt to justify the evil act of voting for a person to make law on one’s behalf is that the majority of Muslim scholars say it is allowed to vote, and some even go further saying it is a religious duty
One of the main excuses some people use today in attempt to justify the evil act of voting for a person to make law on one’s behalf is that the majority of Muslim scholars say it is allowed to vote, and some even go further saying it is a religious duty.

This, like every other so-called argument used to justify voting for man to play the role of God and make law, is entirely flawed and can never be used as an excuse to associate partners with Allah by choosing a lawmaker besides Him. There are many places in the Qur’aan in which Allah (SWT) informs us of individuals in the past who were favoured by Him and were given knowledge, yet they abused the knowledge they were given, started to follow their own desires and misled the people.

For example, the Jews and Christians (People of the Book) were accused by Allah of worshipping their rabbis and priests by obeying and following their religious edicts which clearly went against the commands of Allah. Allah (SWT) says in the Qur’aan:

“They (Jews and Christians) took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah (by obeying them in things which they made lawful or unlawful according to their own desires without being ordered by Allah).” (EMQ at-Tawbah, 9:31)

‘Uday bin Haatim used to be a Christian. When he heard the Messenger of Allah (SAW) recite the above verse he tried to deny this and responded: “We did not worship them (rabbis and priests).” The Prophet (SAW) replied: “Did they (rabbis and priests) not forbid what Allah permitted and hence you forbade it; and they permitted what Allah forbade and thus you permitted it?” ‘Uday replied “Yes.” The Prophet (SAW) said, “That is how you worshipped them.” After this incident ‘Uday (RA) embraced Islam.

So it can be argued that any Muslim who blindly follows a scholar when he permits what Allah forbids has taken him as a lord and false god besides Allah. Any matter which is clearly forbidden by Allah – such as alcohol, committing shirk (in this case, voting for man to make law), adultery, interest (ribaa), and so forth – cannot be made lawful by scholars. Moreover, one cannot claim on the Day of Judgement that they were merely following their scholars or the majority of people and therefore cannot be blamed for their actions. Allah (SWT) says:

“And those who followed (blindly) will say: “If only we had one more chance to return (to the worldly life), we would disown (declare ourselves as innocent from) them as they have disowned (declared themselves as innocent from) us.” Thus Allah will show them their deeds as regrets for them. And they will never get out of the Fire.” (EMQ al-Baqarah, 2:167)

Furthermore, it is reported in the Sunan of Ibn Maajah that Allah’s Messenger (SAW) said: “Verily, what I fear most for my Ummah is misguided Imaams.” There can be no doubt that the misguided Imaams (or scholars) of today are those who allow voting for man-made law by twisting the verses of Allah and Shari’ah principles in order to achieve popularity, maintain their career and please the masses, tyrannical governments and disbelievers.

Britain: Catholic schoolgirls told to dress like Muslims for mosque visit or face truancy

From The Daily Mail U.K.

Parents’ outrage as children told ‘dress as a Muslim for mosque trip – or you will be branded a truant’

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 9:19 AM on 12th May 2010

A Catholic schoolgirl has been branded a ‘truant’ by her teachers after she refused to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque.

Staff had ordered 14-year-old Amy Owen and her classmates to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote ‘community cohesion.’

Parents at the 1,100 pupil Ellesmere Port Catholic High School in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire were also told they were each required to make a £3 contribution towards the trip for all Year Nine students.

Michelle Davies' daughter Amy Owen was ordered to wear a headscarf  and trousers or leggings for a school trip to a mosqueMichelle Davies’ daughter Amy Owen was ordered to wear a headscarf and trousers or leggings for a school trip to a mosque

But when Amy refused to dress in Muslim attire for the visit to Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool, staff warned her about rules and said refusal would mean non attendance which would then be marked down as an ‘unauthorised absence.’

In a stern letter to her family with words in block capitals and underlined, the school’s headmaster Peter Lee said the visit was ‘as compulsory as a geography field trip.’ Continue Reading →

Of policy, trends and freedom of speech, and all which rely upon it.

Here are some examples which are, to the best of my knowledge, in order of oldest to newest and show a policy being enforced, or one formed from a trend, or perhaps more insidiously, from some kind of manual.

First, the Israeli ambassador to the US was shouted down, and his speech ended before it began at California Irvine.

Then, former Belgian leftist, who had seen the effects of Islam on all the things he actually cared about, changes his mind and was about to speak at a Norwegian university on Islam and the following happened, where the disrupters credited the students at Irvine of showing them the way:

Lastly, we have todays winner. In a highly calculated ploy to destroy anyone who would oppose Islamic primacy in Europe, Lars Vilks is shouted down and attacked at a university in Sweden. Lots of  information here on Vlad if you want to scroll down a bit. I just felt that this is becoming sufficiently a calculated spreading pattern that it needs to be demonstrated as such, and as such, a counter strategy had better be deployed soon, if we wish to preserve any semblance of the things that gave humanity pretty much everything we have gained since the darkest most brutal and crushingly unfair points of our history.

Artist Lars Vilks attacked at university in Uppsala in Sweden

Translation: Ted Ekeroth

Below, is basically the same video, but from Aftenbladet TV with English subtitles done by VladTepes and translation by www.snaphanen.dk

Edit by Baron Bodissey

Tuesday May 11th

Vilks Attacked During Seminar

On Tuesday a man attacked the artist Lars Vilks in connection with a seminar on art at Uppsala University.

The atmosphere was calm at the beginning, Uppsala Nya Tidning reports. When Vilks showed a movie with sexual content the atmosphere became tense.

“The man in the first row suddenly rushed towards me. He gave me a “Danish,” [dansk skalle, hitting someone on the head using your own head] and I hit the wall and dropped my glasses,” Vilks says to TT.

The Uppsala Nya Tidning photographer, who was on the scene, describes the situation as extremely tense.

According to Vilks the man belonged to a group that tried to disturb the seminar. Vilks was taken to safety after the assault.

“I’m not injured, just a bit bruised.”

The seminar was broadcast by Uppsala Nya Tidning on the net.

The group that the man belongs consists of Muslims, says Vilks.

TT: How do you know that they are Muslims?

“They shouted “Mohammed, Mohammed,” says Vilks

He says that the pandemonium was still going on at around 18:00. The seminar was about Vilks’ own art projects and the topic of art and freedom of speech.

“My seminar in Jönköping was cancelled before I could hold the session, and now it has happened here. I am being stopped by physical violence, and I think it’s problematic if a mob is in charge,” he says.

The police were watching the event. A police officer was assaulted during the pandemonium.

“A crowd rushed forward. When a policeman tried to stop them he was attacked. As of now, two persons are in custody,” says Tommy Karlsson, commanding officer of the police in Uppsala county.

The two arrested persons are in their twenties, Uppsala Nya Tidning reports. A third was taken into custody for “disturbing the peace”.

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/vilks-overfallen-under-forelasning-1.1092322

Meanwhile, outside, the Muslims are showing the world the only two words they seem to learn at university:

Nazia Quazi reaches freedom in Dubai

Nazia Quazi reaches freedom in Dubai

???

After being held in Saudi Arabia  for three years, Nazia Quazi will finally be free of her father’s  control.

After being held in Saudi Arabia for three years, Nazia Quazi will finally be free of her father’s control.

Photograph by: Handout photo, The Ottawa Citizen

OTTAWA — As of Monday morning, Nazia Quazi is free of her father’s control.

The young Muslim woman, who is a Canadian citizen and studied at the University of Ottawa, had been trapped in the Saudi Arabian capital for the past three years under the country’s male guardianship system that sees fathers speak on behalf of their unmarried daughters.

Her father refused to let the 24-year-old Quazi leave the country, allegedly because he didn’t approve of her boyfriend, Bjorn Singhal, whom she met in Ottawa.

Last night, Singhal, who had been communicating with her via text messages, reported that Quazi boarded a plane bound for Dubai, which was rolling away from the terminal when she had to turn off her phone. It landed in Dubai less than two hours later.

As soon as she was in the air, she was officially out of the reach of the male guardianship system and therefore free to make her own choices about where she lives and who she spends time with. The plan, Singhal said, is for them to marry in Dubai on Wednesday.

Quazi’s mother, who lives in Ottawa, travelled to Riyadh with her son last week, reportedly to try to convince her husband to let their daughter leave and be with her boyfriend.

It would seem she was successful as they all traveled to Dubai on Sunday night with Quazi for the wedding.

Singhal’s mother, who lives in Montreal, also travelled to Dubai on Sunday, to be there for her son’s wedding.

Singhal said the plan was to go to the high court and get married while also getting “the necessary paperwork done for Nazia to be with me legally.” Continue Reading →

Ottawa man returns medal to Saudis to protest treatment of trapped woman

Below, a story about a true hero, and champion for justice.

From The Montreal Gazette:
By Jennifer Campbell, The Ottawa Citizen April 19, 2010

Mark Brousseau hopes some of his  700 shipmates will return their Liberation of Kuwait medals as well.

Mark Brousseau hopes some of his 700 shipmates will return their Liberation of Kuwait medals as well.

Photograph by: Bryanna Bradley, The Ottawa Citizen

OTTAWA — A retired naval officer from Ottawa is giving back a medal of honour in protest of the Saudi government’s treatment of a Canadian citizen.

And he hopes others will follow suit.

Mark Brousseau, who served on HMCS Athabaskan in the early 1990s during the first Gulf war, received the Liberation of Kuwait medal from the government of Saudi Arabia.

On Tuesday morning, he’ll head to the Saudi embassy in Ottawa to return it to the ambassador to protest the country’s male guardianship system that has kept 24-year-old Canadian Nazia Quazi in the country against her will.

The Muslim woman, whose mother and brother live in Ottawa, went to Saudi three years ago to visit her father and to do the Umrah, the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca.

But once she arrived, her father, whom she claims doesn’t approve of her boyfriend, took her travel documentation and identification and has refused to let her leave the country. In Saudi Arabia, the male guardianship system says that fathers must make decisions for their unmarried daughters. Quazi lives in housing provided by her employer, and says her father, whom she alleges has beaten her in the past, is becoming increasingly violent and abusive. MPs Paul Dewar and Bob Rae have called for action. Deepak Obhrai, minister of state for foreign affairs, says the government is in contact with Saudi officials, but can’t do much because of the country’s rules. Continue Reading →

ALGERIA: PROTESTS IN FRANCE FOR WOMEN IN HASSI MESSAOUD

ALGERIA: PROTESTS IN FRANCE FOR WOMEN IN HASSI MESSAOUD: ANSAMED HT gov

(ANSAmed) – PARIS, MAY 4 – Protests in France against the daily aggression against women working in Hassi Messaoud, the oil city in the heart of Algeria, continue. These women are considered to be prostitutes by fundamentalist imams, only because they live on their own. The imams set people against them in fiery sermons, which are always followed by punitive expeditions in which the women are robbed, beaten, tortured and raped. Today Francés Grand Lodge for women in a statement denounced “the silence that reigns on this extreme violence, aggression, the rapes and even murders” and deplores “the indifference of the media regarding these dramatic and barbaric events”. The violence has also been denounced by other French associations, particularly that tragic night in 2001 when around a hundred women ended up in hospital after an expedition of men armed with clubs, steel bars, knives. The story was recently told in a book by Algerian writer Nadia Kaci, unveiling the drama to France. But the drama still continues according to articles in Algerian dailies in the oil city, which denounced the impunity of the aggressors, the silence of the institutions and local authorities, the laxity of the community regarding the general condition of women in Algeria. (ANSAmed).
2010-05-04 18:46