3 Replies to “A different view video of the Lars Vilks lecture. The natives are restless.”
Here is a much longer video of the same event, where the fanatical muslims shriek and threaten, and finally, in jubilation over the cancellation chants:
“Muhammed, Muhammed!”
This SCUM needs to be removed from our societies. NOW!!!!! Before they take everything down with them.
The Danish cartoons’ controversy of 2006-2008 was not a unique storm that has fortunately passed over the world into history. It exhibited reactions that had much in common with previous transnational disputes involving satire, such as the movie Life of Brian and Holocaust cartoons, but there is now the potential for global communications to accelerate
and exacerbate such clashes. The media amplify clashes between the various actors and the taboos involved in such disputes. There is also a ‘dialogue of the deaf’, in which political elites are more concerned with speaking to their own constituencies or refuse to withdraw from problematic statements and policies rather than engaging in dialogue. Such discursive conflict has implications for transnational democracy and public diplomacy.
Discover more from Vlad Tepes
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Here is a much longer video of the same event, where the fanatical muslims shriek and threaten, and finally, in jubilation over the cancellation chants:
“Muhammed, Muhammed!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2IHnWY-i6Y
From the Norwegian site document.no, in the following thread:
http://www.document.no/2010/05/uppsala_-_senter_for_hoyreekst.html
This SCUM needs to be removed from our societies. NOW!!!!! Before they take everything down with them.
The Danish cartoons’ controversy of 2006-2008 was not a unique storm that has fortunately passed over the world into history. It exhibited reactions that had much in common with previous transnational disputes involving satire, such as the movie Life of Brian and Holocaust cartoons, but there is now the potential for global communications to accelerate
and exacerbate such clashes. The media amplify clashes between the various actors and the taboos involved in such disputes. There is also a ‘dialogue of the deaf’, in which political elites are more concerned with speaking to their own constituencies or refuse to withdraw from problematic statements and policies rather than engaging in dialogue. Such discursive conflict has implications for transnational democracy and public diplomacy.