“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
You can’t see my censored YouTube video “A Word To The Criminal Migrant” in the UK (over a million views, subtitled in 19 languages).https://t.co/N5lnUiJr3s
But you can see this video on wife beating in Islam (only a rod will help).https://t.co/sYxl7wbllP— Pat Condell (@patcondell) December 19, 2017
Pat’s video CAN, and SHOULD, be seen in the UK on Bitchute
The video that Youtube has been putting increasing pressure on:
This is important. This video is only, and nothing more, than correcting a MSM slander of the good people of Poland.
Youtube has responded to a video showing proof that the MSM and European Union narrative on Poland’s independence day marches is pure anti-nation-state propaganda, by making it almost impossible to find, and no way to interact with it. Please spread it, and please add your thoughts on it under this video, since Youtube decided not to allow it on their platform.
I found this on Swedish Twitter.
Someone reported this anti-semitic and horrible image that someone posted on Facebook.
Facebook deems this photo to not violate their terms of hate speech.
I'm all for free speech, but this is violent and NOT ok.
What is wrong with Facebook? pic.twitter.com/1WphLmibOz
— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) December 11, 2017
Bernie Sanders along with 90 other Senators unanimously voted to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem in June #Zionism https://t.co/RZxoOkffNc pic.twitter.com/nHCHip2Hky
— Julian Assange ? (@JulianAssange) December 9, 2017
As reader’s of this site will be aware, Michael Hanson’s excellent film, Killing Europe, was cancelled within 24 hours of its planned showing at the Ottawa Public Library thanks to severe pressure from highly illiberal forces.
It was however, shown a week later at The Zionist Centre in Toronto to a packed house, and to a standing ovation.
Some threats were made by far left wing violent extremist groups like ANTIFA and other agents, but pretty much nothing happened this time.
Here is an article that is old world journalism. It asks the right questions and attempts to unravel the rhetorical weapons being used to destroy the basic liberal values and individual rights of all of us in the West.
Now have a look at this one from a publication that calls itself, “The Torontoist”
an excerpt:
Despite its hateful tone, the documentary received a standing ovation from the audience.
An Islamophobic documentary made its world premiere on Sunday in Toronto when it was screened at the Toronto Zionist Centre, at an event hosted by the Jewish Defense League and Act For Canada.
Killing Europe uses examples of real and horrific assaults to portray all Muslim migrants as violent rapists or, at the very least, complicit in these crimes.
The Ottawa Public Library cancelled a planned screening of the film in late November after complaints by Ottawa Against Fascism and human rights lawyer Richard Warman. In an interview with Metro News, filmmaker Michael Hansen said the cancellation constituted an act of censorship and claimed his ability to screen his movie was a question of free speech.
Hansen attended the Toronto showing, according to the invitation issued by the Jewish Defense League, an extreme Zionist group that often provides security for anti-Muslim events and demonstrations. It was hosted in partnership with ACT! for Canada, the Canadian offshoot of ACT! for America, which is the largest anti-Muslim group in the United States, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Hansen was provided with questions and an opportunity to comment and declined to do so.
The article is quite the mix of fabrication and half truths. Some readers noticed and commented appropriately:
And when the author was called on it, the comments where not just closed but removed altogether.
This is a free country and people should be free to write whatever they want and hold and broadcast whatever political opinion they want. And in that spirit, I thought I would allow people to comment here on that article, once they have actually clicked over to read it of course. Seems only proper. Even better if you have seen the movie, which you can watch here.
One update. The article says that “Hansen was provided with questions and an opportunity to comment and declined to do so..”.
According to Mr. Hansen however, he was sent a list of questions and Michael offered to do a Skype interview with the journalist and the journalist declined. A rather important omission from the article some may say.
Thank you Anon, who sent in the link and screen caps of the comments.
Apparently Youtube decided to put the original version in some kind of google jail. This means that Google is deciding that democratic government’s positions on issues should not be told while unelected globalists at the EU have free reign to spout whatever nonsense they wish to force on the peoples of Europe.
This is a problem.
UPDATE:
Below is a comment which clearly explains the nature of the “Youtube Jail”.
Comment:
“some kind of jail”
Restricted mode – the video cannot be found unless you have a direct link, you will be warned before watching it, likes and comments will be disabled, it can’t be shared, and it can’t be embedded. Combined with google’s explicit intent on hiding non-politically correct material from search results and instead direct the user to approved playlists for re-education the video is as good as buried alive.
Interview on initial guilty verdict:
An original translation of a press release by the Bundespolizei NRW. (update: we have included a statement of the police at the bottom)
BPOL NRW: After sexual assault in the main train station Dortmund – Federal Police Dog Ivo Apprehends Suspects
13.11.2017 – 10:22
Federal Police ‘Officer’ Ivo. Photo: Bundespolizei
(ots) – Sunday morning (November 12.) sexual harassment against two women on the square in front of the main train station Dortmund was reported. In the manhunt for the suspects, police dog Ivo was able to apprehend three of the suspects. Another suspect was apprehended with the active support of an innocent bystander.
Around 04:00 AM, Police Dortmund informed the Federal Police at the main train station that two women had dialled the police emergency number. Several men were harassing them on the yard in front of the train station.
As part of the search, a large group of men was noted at the northern exit. When they spotted the Federal Police officers, they fled in the direction Nordstadt. Several Federal Police officers pursued them, among them police dog Ivo.
In the Keuning Park, several of the suspects tried to hide, whereupon Ivo was called to action. He picked up the scent of the men and was able to apprehend three persons (18/22/27) in the shrubs. The men froze there, apparently impressed by the barking dog, until the officers were able to arrest them.
One Federal Police officer was able to arrest another 24-year-old suspect at the entrance of the Keuning park, with the help of an innocent bystander.
This deployment against the suspects was observed by two women, who documented the efforts, and noted the license plates of the police cars. Addressed about their demeanor, the women announced that they intend to file criminal complaints against the Federal Police officers. They did not specify what it was exactly that they held against the officers.
According to the two aggrieved women (24/34) from Hamm and Werne, the suspects insulted them, touched them inappropriately, spat on them, and pushed them.
The arrested men are Iraqi nationals, all of wom have asylum applications pending, and who reside in Wuppertal, Bochum and Witten.
The Federal Police have opened investigations against the men for insult, sexual coercion, and sexual harassment. Investigations are ongoing.
Update:
Rundblick Unna obtained a statement by police spokesman Volker Stall as to the two women who announced to sue the officers.
An original translation from HNA (Hessische/Niedersächsische Allgemeine).
“Steinke, you Nazi! We will com [sic] back” – Antifa attack on the former house of an AfD youth organization official. (source: PI news)
Göttingen. The regional chairman of the AfD youth organization, Junge Alternative, Lars Steinke, will presumably have to find a new apartment after a court ruling.
The district court of Göttingen granted his landlord’s action for annulment. Reason: the 24-year old withheld from his landlord that, because of his political opinions, he were a likely target for left-leaning violence. According to the court, he should have had to enlighten her about his special role, because it might affect the lease object, a spokesman said. As he had omitted doing that, the lease contract was a result of malevolent deceit, and therefore invalid.
The 24-year-old had moved into the apartment in the city of Göttingen in July 2017. A few months later, the landlord went to court to refute the lease contract – successfully: the district court of Göttingen pointed in its ruling to the respective jurisdiction of the Federal Court. According to that, it is malevolent deceit even then when someone omits facts about which a contractual partner in good faith and trust can expect clarification. For example, the seller of a car must mention when a used car had an accident.
The Göttinger official of the „Jungen Alternative“ had himself said in posts that he saw himself as a target of leftist activists. As this circumstance were significant for the decision about the lease contract, he should have told the landlord without being asked, the judge ruled. And indeed, in the period following, damage of property and arson on the premises occurred, for example at the trash cans.
In march, the car of the 24-year-old, that he had parked at the street, burst into flames in front of the apartment house. The heat damaged another car and a close balcony parapet. The court pointed to the fact that similar instances had occurred at his previous address in Göttingen.
The father of the 24-year-old had signed the lease. According to a spokesman of the judiciary, the lease contained a clause that the father would consistently loan the apartment to his son. But this were not relevant for the decision.
Appeal against the ruling
The 24-year-old announced after the court ruling that he intends to lodge an appeal against the “scandalous ruling”.
Translator’s note:
Die Achse des Guten comment: “District Court Göttingen shreds Constitution” and remind that the German constitution says, „No one may be disadvantaged or preferred for his sex, his ancestry, his language, his home and origin, his belief, his religious or political views“.