Reader’s Links for Oct. 28th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Reader’s Links for Oct. 28th, 2026”

  1. The Dems are getting ready for a big loss on election day, they are laying the ground work to start screaming that Trump stole this election. Then they will start rioting, their goal is to force PT to use the insurrection act and send in troops to restore order. They will use this as an excuse to increase to violence.

  2. Absolutely sickening to see the feckless Liberals, the not so honourable men and women in the House of Commons wearing poppies.

    I think of the line in the poem Flanders Field, “Take up our quarrel with the foe, to you with failing hands we throw, the torch, be yours to hold it high, lest yea break faith with us who die………..

    The “Who cares” peoplekind, the followers of Mark Carney, the placed one, the power maniac who wants to be the EU leader next.

  3. This news article is long and confusing, but a datapoint for when political correctness confronts reality and how politicians waste time with debating it.Leftist Jews in Maryland’s state capitol realize everyone else thinks it’s great to award a posthumous citation praising a man who told them he wants Israeli Jews and Christians and Druzim to die so long as he also (allegedly ?) disrupted a City Council meeting with a stink bomb. This is the nonsense that results when words are more relevant than actions. It is unclear if the local Jews want to praise Malcolm X, too.


    “He [Mr. Ateto] said to a friend of mine that Israel and Jews have no right to exist,” she said. “She said ‘what do you mean by that? There’s also Christians and Muslim and Druze [communities in Israel], where are they supposed to go?’ and he said that they could all die with the Jews.”

    Ateto was known for his devotion to the causes he supported. A few years ago, he showed up to a city council meeting in Annapolis dressed in a poop costume to protest a bill that he called a “turd,” according to the Capital Gazette. The newspaper also reported he released a stink bomb in the suit, which caused council members to evacuate the chambers. Ateto received significant community [monetary] support during his [terminal] illness.

    … the Oct. 14 unveiling of a Malcolm X statue at a city library as an example of how a community can acknowledge conflicting aspects of a person’s legacy. Initially, he said he was against the statue’s placement on the grounds that he knew Malcolm X had made antisemitic statements.

    https://washingtonjewishweek.com/annapolis-citation-sparks-dispute-over-late-activists-legacy/
    https://web.archive.org/web/20261023170540/https://washingtonjewishweek.com/annapolis-citation-sparks-dispute-over-late-activists-legacy/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*