This video was published on video platform, Dumpert this morning. It shows Kurdish communists and ANTIFA having a march/demonstration possibly today in The Netherlands even though all such gatherings are forbidden due to Covid regs.
Here are some videos of how police treat Dutch people protesting oppressive Covid regulations:
February 7 2021
— jacknieuw (@jacknieuw1) February 7, 2021
It seems various governments in The Netherlands designate an area where a protest is going to be against Covid measures as a “Security risk zone” allowing the police to bust heads arbitrarily. Unless you are a violent communist insurgent. In which case carry on.
C. has provided more links and information at this comment.
Thank you C.
Many important observations in this series of tweets
We are negotiating bulk rates with law firms across Canada to handle THOUSANDS of https://t.co/94EkUTpA5G cases. We’ll announce the first deal later this week. If we can, we will make police and prosecutors take EVERY SINGLE CASE TO TRIAL. Start building bigger courthouses.
— Ezra Levant ? (@ezralevant) January 27, 2021
Pay no attention. He gets nothing right at all.
(A couple of important notes on this video. While I find a lot of it mind blowing in some ways, he did use this scenario material to advance an ugly agenda. The quote attributed to Kissinger was never found to be anything he said, and all sources lead to neo-Nazis. Also the attempt to massage in the 911 conspiracy stuff is odious at best.)
We must remember to add him to our daily 3 minutes of hate if there is any energy left after Trump.
In 2009, I had the opportunity to see someone speak who to this day I think is the smartest man I have ever heard.
His name is David Yerushalmi. A constitutional lawyer in the US. A man who has argued cases before the Supreme Court and won, and who has defended some of the people beleaguered by the left even back then and since.
In his talk, he explained how freedom of speech works under US law. To be more accurate, I should say, how it worked in 2009. It still technically works like this, but the law is the least of our worries these days.
David explained that you can say anything, even that you want to kill so and so, providing that there is no “immediacy.”
In other words, if a person says or writes, “Im so mad at so and so that I want to kill them!” or, “I hate so and so this much I hope they get a bullet in the head!” that is perfectly legal right up to the point where the person adds “immediacy”. This means when they say, “I want to kill so-and-so tomorrow at 2:00 PM”, now its a crime. It has gone from protected speech to a threat and a plan to carry out that threat.
This all seems very reasonable. It was a great way to run a nation. Maximal allowance for normal human emoting, but a clear line where the law needs to act to prevent a crime.
The left however, which has been planning the destruction of all reason based societies for over a century now, has taken a page from the Chinese war manual, that of unlimited warfare. Or perhaps the Chinese took it from the Frankfurt School, who took it from Marx.
But however the chain of events happened, the result is that the left, in their unceasing efforts to totally deconstruct Western Civilization and all of its institutions, went outside the usual implements of a free society. They find people with a voice and destroy them by getting them fired, getting their families fired from their own jobs, doxxing, arranging for groups of communist insurgent thugs to attack them or their property, and who seem strangely immune from criticism and the law when they do.
One of the most pernicious tactics is the deliberate reinterpretation of whatever they might say to make them appear to have violated vague sets of selectively enforced rules and many many more similar, but unethical, unfair and often even illegal tactics. One clear example is how when President Trump made a video asking people to peacefully go home and the importance of peace in the democratic transfer of power, the video was removed from all leftist controlled platforms and the narrative that President Trump called for violence was invented and amplified as a justification for his further public destruction.
This website for its entire 13 years of operation is riddled with stories about people who have been deplatformed or otherwise destroyed for
And in the last week, it could be entirely those examples, that and it could have a dozen times more examples than we have posted, just from what we have seen in the comments and on Twitter etc.
At this point, what is legal is of considerably less importance than the actual rules of expression as they are enforced by extralegal measures by the left. Which means when you are speaking of a leftist leader, you must phrase your emotional output very carefully. Of course, if its part of the attempt to assassinate President Trump’s character, memory, legacy, accomplishments etc. you can say whatever you want and be celebrated for it, and all the 1st amendment rights will be aggressively championed for you.
I suppose this is part of what one communist, or was it an Islamic tactician explained, would be how they would use our very freedoms to destroy us. But they left out how the really destructive part was denying those freedoms to their enemies. Namely us.
So I ask all commenters to this site to consider the reality of freedom of speech today when using this site. Say what you want of course. but don’t make it easy for our enemies, and they are large and powerful, to destroy this site, and go after its people.
We are working on a project to allow real freedom of speech as written in the US 1st amendment right now. And it will have all the freedoms AND legal limits that are the parameters of the traditional American approach to freedom. But till that is up and integrated, please curb your most unfiltered thoughts in the face of what ruefully we have to admit is the new reality, the new landscape of a post legal America and West.
Thank you all for your efforts. This community, which is all of our accomplishment, is still the greatest thing I have ever been involved with.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.
This is an exceptional Tucker video. For those that want the advanced tutorial, and the greater understanding that its not so much selective enforcement as it is dialectic negation, a well formulated Marxist tactic to take down the west, please read this Stephen Coughlin/Rich Higgens document, Re-remembering the misremembered left. And for those with a larger apetite, there is a newer one we haven’t started yet either, Insurrection and Violence.
This is a series of links to articles and videos sent in by C. who has a firm grasp on many things Dutch.
Thank you C for compiling all of this:
English language article:
Police in The Hague said they arrested several people at a protest against the Dutch coronavirus rules after they were attacked by demonstrators. One officer was injured in the incident, police confirmed in a statement. Separately, four more suspects were interrogated in connection with violence at a June anti-coronavirus measures rally also in The Hague.
It was not clear what led to the confrontations between protestors and police at around 2 p.m on Thursday. “We have acted because several protesters behaved provocatively and aggressively towards the police,” police said. […]
Vechten met ME in de Poten. pic.twitter.com/wuJMmmbvyK
— Bob van Keulen (@BobHGL) August 20, 2020
(These do not look like all Muslims or Africans or even ANTIFA or leftists. Its quite a mix of people in on this)
Riots ‘highly counterproductive”, Justice Min says
Rioting and unrest in three Dutch cities in the past week is highly counter-productive, Justice and Security Ferd Grapperhaus said on Thursday. The rioting surprised many, and was believed by some to have been born out of youth frustration, boredom, and anger related to government rules in place to stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus.
“This is not tolerable. We have a social issue, coronavirus, which no one has asked for. We are trying to solve it as best we can,“. Grapperhaus said. “The last thing you should do is riot, [and] commit vandalism,” he said, according to newswire ANP.
Grapperhaus called the unrest in Amersfoort, The Hague and Utrecht anti-social, saying that it was not only young people involved in the criminality. “I also see guys aged 30 or 40 walking in between,” he said.
The minister was set to speak with the mayors of those three cities next week to determine if the national government could offer more assistance.
On Wednesday a third person was arrested for inciting riots in the Kanaleneiland district of Utrecht. The 21-year-old from IJsselstein is accused of using social media to rally people to cause trouble in the streets, the Public Prosecution Service said.
A 17-year-old from Utrecht was also taken into custody for throwing rocks at police and setting off fireworks during the unrest. He was found using closed-circuit video images.
Mixed bunch of people drive off a squad of undercover police”
Mainstream media, what is happening in #TheHague (Netherlands)?
? 'protest against new COVID-19 law'
? 'undercover police team evacuated'pic.twitter.com/2vx2YCLl7M
— Oh boy what a shot (@ohboywhatashot) August 20, 2020
Right before the police took off:
Er gaat op twitter een filmpje rond waarbij je de demonstranten de undercover Romeo’s zomaar ‘ziet insluiten’ waarna ze vertrekken in t busje, maar wat er aan vooraf ging is niet te zien.
Dat is hier wel te zien.
— NEE TEGEN MSM (@NEETEGENMSM1) August 20, 2020
This was across from the Binnenhof / parliament.
C. adds the following observation. A surprise to no one, but its good to see how consistent all our formerly representative governments are across the Western World:
This is not the first such protest, but looks like the biggest yet.looks like police had carte blanche, they beat people with truncheons.
Interesting how the vice-mayor ordered them to hold back during the muslim riots the last few days, at least in Utrecht.
First, please watch this first five minutes of a Danish TV show with one of Facebook’s top execs. Although we hope to have the whole thing done over the course of next week, this first segment contains an admission which is so stunning it is hard to believe he said it out loud like it was an OK thing to say.
And if you do not think this is a big deal, consider it in the context of the video below, and the video below in the context of the one above.
The company that tells you what you can say and not say about a person with zero consideration of what is true, wants you to use money it invents and completely controls.
How would this not become a Chinese like, Social Credit system where Facebook can cancel or refuse to allow you to buy airline or rail tickets or anything else someone with whom it disagrees. And at the moment it disagrees with anyone not sporting a Neo-Marxist value set.