Facebook now openly admitting its ludicrously Soviet like policies: “Only can say bad things about Tommy Robinson”

First, please watch this first five minutes of a Danish TV show with one of Facebook’s top execs. Although we hope to have the whole thing done over the course of next week, this first segment contains an admission which is so stunning it is hard to believe he said it out loud like it was an OK thing to say.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmYZopgdUHiCi8n6Xy211t2grPaw2CMxYYrdUri73osPvP

And if you do not think this is a big deal, consider it in the context of the video below, and the video below in the context of the one above.

The company that tells you what you can say and not say about a person with zero consideration of what is true, wants you to use money it invents and completely controls.

How would this not become a Chinese like, Social Credit system where Facebook can cancel or refuse to allow you to buy airline or rail tickets or anything else someone with whom it disagrees. And at the moment it disagrees with anyone not sporting a Neo-Marxist value set.

So a muslim decides to get more religious and stab two Jewish people at a market…

Thank you C for finding and translating this video. Interesting how the PM of the Netherlands and all his minions aren’t running around in skull caps and playing Torah readings at all the schools.

Video of the actual attack:

 

Western world now mostly communist

Of all the events I see the ones that frighten me the most are these kinds of things.

That the Australian government officially believes in mob rule now instead of rule of law, and that there must only ever be one position allowed to be taken by any public figure on important issues. No nuances. No shades of grey. This is terrifying.

Parliament now feels that the man who attacked an Australian senator should face no charges because the parliament does not like what he said, should scare the living shit out of all of us.


Not that the above post is not scary enough, but a reader from Oz tells us in a comment that he cannot see this video in Australia.

An Australian, is forbidden from seeing a video of their own parliament in his own country.

Lets hope they can’t block bit.tube yet:

UPDATE #2:

RCMP watching Canadians on ‘social media’

For those of you that think the RCMP are honest actors and act in accordance with rule of law and the enforcement of the legal rights of the public, please watch the videos at the bottom of this post.

‘Project Wide Awake’: How the RCMP Watches You on Social Media

How police are using new software to expand surveillance of citizens’ activities.

The RCMP has been quietly running an operation monitoring individuals’ Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media activity for at least two years, The Tyee has learned.

 

The existence of Project Wide Awake has never been reported.

 

And The Tyee investigation revealed that the RCMP has moved from a “reactive” approach — analyzing specific social media accounts as part of a criminal investigation — to a “proactive approach,” which the RCMP said aims to “help detect and prevent a crime before it occurs.”

That involves ongoing wide-scale monitoring of individuals’ social media use and could pose a threat to Canadians’ privacy and charter rights, say experts.

Yes the RCMP are now doing pre-crime. Maybe that was their excuse for looting the homes of people in High River for legally owned guns using a list the RCMP was expressly forbidden from having by an act of Parliament under Stephen Harper.

H/T ML.

 

 

Martin Sellner updates us on his situation

Martin’s home was raided by police and his name has been viciously slandered internationally by major news organizations because the Christchurch mosque attacker donated some money to his organization, Generation Identitaire, over a year ago.

Imagine if the media treated the Clintons like that. The Clinton Foundation contributions alone would put the Clintons behind bars till their great great grandchildren where collecting social security. And that would be just for the ones that were already criminals. In Martin’s case, the contribution came a year before the person had committed any misdeeds.