Category Archives: Explaining leftism

Videos from yesterday’s press conference on the March for Life today in Ottawa

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Please see the detailed description for each speaker at RAIR Foundation 

Ruth Robert:

George Buscemi:

Jack Fonseca: (If you only have time for one, please make it this one. This one deals with the censorship being applied to those who have counter-abortion views. Once the state takes this power for one issue, well… ah… Covid. Right? Anyone even remember what happened to people who tried to warn against lockdowns or the vaxx when it still mattered?

Josie Luetke:

Pete Baklinski:

The videos are presented here in the exact opposite order that they spoke (in the pouring rain) Yesterday on Parliament Hill.

We could write an essay about how with the left the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point, but no time. In point form, once the state has taken the power to limit your rights, either for the collective good or for health reasons, then that is a power that will become the new normal for all issues where the state has ambitions against the public’s interests and rights. It is never about the issue, although they may seek the desired outcome of the issue as they spin it.

Start listening to Mark Carney and how he uses climate and net zero to obliterate Canadian industry when he is made PM. And he will be. And he will do it.

 

Perfect example of intersectionality

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Two words the dialectical left use we need to understand.

“Intersectionality”, and “queer”.

We understand the word queer to mean gay or better, homosexual. But it has been repurposed by the left to mean a kind of corralling of all deviant sexual identities to weaponize them as battering rams against classical civilization and healthy values. Intersectionality, means the point at which various dialectic attacks which are on the surface quite different such as feminism and Islam, but both have the intention of destroying the West. This may be given different names in order to hide the intention somewhat, like “the patriarchy” or “Dar al Harb” the world of war where the infidels rule. But intersectionality is where all groups no matter how different work together to the same purpose.

Below, is just too good an example not to post.

For a much better explanation of the nature of Queer as a concept, please search out James Lindsay’s video on the subject. If I get time, I will add it to this post later on.

It’s not hypocrisy, and it isn’t corruption

Posted on by — 5 Comments ↓

At this point its past undeniable that a communist revolution has taken place in North America, and frankly over a great deal of what was Western Civilization overall.

It has become so obvious that the word communism as an adjective for various events and policies, which mere months to a few years ago caused grimacing and smirks in all listeners, has now become a common descriptor, even among the less aware commenters out there. (No offence meant to the linked hosts. They point out important aspects of the revolution and show clips of Trudeau that all need to see)

A large part of this revolution has been the imposition of pseudo-realities, and forcing people to play along with them. This strategy has been applied to everything from immigration to covid to the created Trans-issue and the created climate ‘crisis’.

Governments across the world are rapidly criminalizing expressing opposing views to government dialectics on things like Global Warming using the ‘hate-speech’ catch-all.

Opposing one of these efforts is what made Jordan Peterson famous and influential. He came on the scene because as a Prof. at U of T, he objected to being forced to use pronouns that people chose for themselves. He referred to this as compelled speech. A much more severe form of communist control than mere censorship. And of course he was entirely correct, even if he himself could not see through the same strategy as it applied to Covid and the Vaxx.

As a commenter said below this excellent example of the captured institution, Scientific American under its article on Gender:

“If a man wants to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to him.

If that man wants me to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to me.

No actually it isn’t. It is now up to the state. This is an excellent juxtaposition of Socratic thinking Vs. Hegelian. Anyone who likely reads this site would find what he said to be a pithy and accurate description of the nature of free thought. One actually worth fighting over. Which it certainly is. But in order to do that and win, we need to understand where we actually are now on a political map. And where we are on that map is well demonstrated on the Scientific American article to which the tweet above is a Response:

One of the complains quite often made on this site is when people confuse hypocrisy with dialectics. The difference is subtle, and yet it isn’t.

Here is a fumbly attempt to explain the difference:

Hypocrisy, like corruption, all exist within a single overarching system. Corruption is when a person or group takes advantage of a position, or weakness within the system to advantage themselves in some way.

Hypocrisy is similar. A person speaks or even leads people in a way that indicates self sacrifice, or claims to behave in a way that results in delayed gratification, or advocates for other morally superior behaviours, while in secret they behave in exactly the way they advise others not to do. In both examples, the hypocrites and the corrupt require our Western system to be intact, in order to take advantage of it.

But the system we all knew and grew up with has been replaced with another one.

Therefore, the advocates of that system are not corrupt. They are in fact ideologically pure, but of another system altogether.  They may, and usually do, speak in a way that lets their fellow travellers know what they really mean and intend, (with Trudeau being an excellent example), while knowing full well how the uninitiated will understand their words.

For example, when Trudeau says that those who will not take the mRNA gene therapy shots are racist, misogynists who take up space, he is really saying they are counter-revolutionaries and must be eliminated, or at least their views must be, with the people who refuse government directives being marginalized and disenfranchised. No travel, no leaving or entering Canada, no restaurant access etc.

As an example of what corruption actually is or better, corruption Vs. revolution, The MAFIA requires that the banks and other institutions work as they always have as they need a place to store their own wealth. They need to know that they can build their own homes with cement that will not fall apart after 6 months. They need to know that the cancer that they often are on civilization, does not fully metastasize. Because organized crime, even regular crime for that matter needs a healthy host.

I read a story recently about gangs of people in the US robbing stores, and opening their own sidewalk stores to sell the goods they just stole. I couldn’t help but wonder when gangs will rob those sidewalk shops and set up their own shops with that same merch another block away.

Now while that would make for a decent comedy sketch, we all know why it won’t happen.

The initial robbers who stole the merch from the legal owners, are unencumbered by the rules that stop actual legal merchants from using force against thieves.

In other words, you can rob from the stores with total impunity in many places in the US. Leftist places. Blue cities and states. But try and steal from the thieves and you will be hurt badly or killed.

The following Tweet by president Trump is a powerful indicator of how the courts and justice overall is now dialect as opposed to, well justice based.

The trial isn’t rigged. Trials no longer do what we all thought they did.

Courts, like the CPSO hearings, like the Helen Grus hearings, like many many processes in the Western World which have been captured have re-tuned their entire process to create a pre-determined political outcome, and no longer exist to determine what is true, or lawful or in the interests of society as a whole.

It is no longer using evidence and reason to a rational outcome, but a needed outcome that determines what reasoning and evidence will be allowed.

Looking at the take-over of the Columbia U campus, and other campuses by leftists and Muslims:

We all know that if anything even 10% as antisocial as this happened by Trump supporters what would happen. Or people opposed to Trudeau mandates in Ottawa. What is being permitted on campuses, like what was permitted in 2020 in Seattle and in many cities where the Marxist revolutionary group wearing a beard of Black victimhood called BLM is not hypocrisy.

It is the product of a fundamentally changed system. We need to understand this going forward.

This means there is no changing things back to individual rights and a truth based system by using the system, even if there are partial and occasional victories in the courts.

We need to see first how those victories translate into policy that actually is put into effect to know if our institutions still have any meaning as we thought, and many still think they do.

We, as freedom minded people, as classical liberals perhaps, as believers in the rights of the individual including the right to private property, and raise our children according to our own values, cannot develop effective tactics if we cannot understand the enemy strategy, and more importantly or at least more immediately, know where we are on the game board and what stage of the game is being played.

Senator Babet in Australia does a decent job of listing some of the dialectic attacks for which their system is being re-tuned. Censorship is the new normal now. It has been for decades really, but its enforcement is now overt and exponentially more common. The focus is the same though. Again, David Suzuki and Nuclear Winter as a stunning example of how dozens if not hundreds of hours of TV appearances by Canada’s Fruit Fly Scientist who was banging a drum daily about how Western industry would block out the sun and cause an ice age, are impossible to find. Al Jolson videos from the 1920s. But nothing from Suzuki’s Nuclear Winter narrative attacks from the 1970s. There was video tape by then. Two kinds.

Full text:

Canada does an excellent job of demonstrating dialectical enforcement of protests for or against narrative positions:

Gender identity protestors face arrest in BC if law bans demonstrating at schools

British Columbia’s NDP government is considering new legislation that makes it illegal to demonstrate within 20 metres of school grounds to block gender identity curriculum protests.

Premier David Eby said that the Ministry of Education “has documented 18 major disruptions” of protests at schools in the province since the start of the 2023-24 school year, which he claims disrupt educational activities and intimidate students. 

“We’ve had people banging on school windows in British Columbia,” he said.

“It never crossed my mind to be worried that a grown adult would be waiting on the school perimeter to yell at my child about pornographic books or about puberty blockers,” added Eby.

 

In fact, the Government of BC is passing a law creating bubble zones around schools in the same way the Fed Guv did around abortion clinics.

Laws which are enforced strictly enough that a man who stood with a sign which merely read: “Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of our civilization” was arrested for holding it across the street and yards down the block from an abortion facility. And now, you won’t be able to protest the state sterilizing your own children near a school. Interestingly, both policies have the same outcome. No babies. Quell Coincidence non?

Meanwhile, at NYU

Columbia U:

Not Hypocrisy.

Revolution.

Chip Roy, and what he is missing

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Seems that Chip Roy is about 60% of the way to figuring it out. But clearly has not got it all.

Not going into how and why both sides of the house are making everything worse, because in effect, that is all this whole website is about. The capture of institutions by the COMINTERN and the move from Socratic methods of determining and utilizing objective truth, to a Hegelian one of imposing a pseudo-reality on the public, and punishing both legally and extra-legally anyone who won’t obey that pseudo-reality for being a counter-revolutionary.

What I do want to go into, is taxes. More and more it is clear that governments pretend to use tax dollars as the fuel for their programs. In fact they use taxes to punish the middle class while creating the illusion of rational (read microeconomic theory) financing. The juxtaposition I like for Canada is this one:

When Trudeau doesn’t like a relatively low cost program:

Meanwhile, Trudeau seems to be financing this semi-official program called, The Century Initiative. This is the plan to bring Canada’s population up to 100,000,000 people by the end of the century, and they are ahead of schedule, having brought in another million people to Canada since Stats Canada CELEBRATED an official population of 40,000,000 people just a few months ago. Note the stunningly propaganda nature of this Stats-Canada video. This was never the purpose of Stats-Can. It was to coldly report facts in an unbiased way in order to help determine policy for the future. A Socratic epistemology. First figure out the truth, then apply the truth in a way that makes things better until you have a better truth. That is not what Stats-Can is now. The video below is pure propaganda and a central department of state pushing a policy, rather than reporting on the population and showing how the numbers were determined.

 

Nearly all of these people are from Africa and the middle East. Few have the resources to live in a country like Canada where heat is expensive and mandatory for survival. Many have lots of children. And one gets the impression that Children in Canada are expensive, especially if you have to obey all the rules and laws that apply to children, such as car seats and so on. So it kinda sorta looks like 2/3rds of the nation’s new citizens will be funded by the state to one degree or another, while veterans who want proper medical care for damage taken in the military will not be funded ‘for lack of available funds’.

So beyond the clear illusion of taxation as a necessary part of the weaponization of money for the destruction of Canada, we also have PROOF that the Trudeau government itself knows global Warming is a lie, since each person from the middle East and Africa multiplies his or her carbon footprint by a factor of FOUR. That’s right. If you move from a 3rd world, tropical or desert country to Canada, the carbon required to keep you warm and moving to the things you need to do, is 4 X greater than it was a point of origin, and the state knows this for a hot fact.

The same thing obviously has happened with Health Canada. This is a fun exercise you can follow along with at home!

In summary:

– Taxation is likely an illusion to one degree or another. The government prints to do what it wants to do, and taxation is for the illusion of rationality, and likely to punish the middle class, given the Marxist-Leninist-Hegelian nature of our rulers in nearly all of the West today. For those who haven’t read it, you may want to carefully read this NP article on the next prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney.

-Global Warming is another dialectical bomb to destroy Canada in whatever way they need at the moment. Often by selectively enforcing elements of it as needs be.

-Canada’s various departments have all been transformed into a Hegelian-Marxist weapon against Socratic reality. What vestigial aspects of these departments remain, is largely to create the illusion to the blue pill people that their reality is safe. That the rest of us are Chicken Littles, and no amount of clouds or meteors hitting them in the head will allow them to suspect maybe that tiny poultry was in fact correct. As a prediction, the pretence is likely about to be removed. Slowly the institutions of state will allow themselves to be known more closely as to what they really are, as they determine that their old names and purposes were racist and anathema to the revolution.

Tucker Carlson with Cardinal Muller on the fall of the West

Posted on by

Two TIK History videos dealing with the system of thought of Hitler’s gnosticism

Posted on by

One thing should have become apparent to all who study Islam and communism as a threat doctrine. And that is when dealing with an alien system of thought, any attempt to fight it is doomed to fail or at least the cost of winning becomes unimaginably high if you do not understand how the enemy thinks, and therefore why they do what they do, and even in fact, what it is they intend to do. Once you can understand these things, you can predict their actions. If you can predict their actions you have at least the potential to defeat them.

For example, Islam differs from Christianity in several fundamental ways. One of them is in the eschatology. Christianity believes that “Jesus will come as a thief in the night” . One critical aspect of this is that nothing humans do can make these events unfold. Christian end times events are set by God and not by man.

Islam on the other hand, believes that it is up to the followers of Mohamed to create the conditions to bring on the end times. Worse, that the martyrs who died fighting for global Islamic manifest destiny are stuck waiting in their graves for the final battle in a city in Syria until the believers can force this mighty battle to decide all things. This city was Dabiq and was also the name of the Islamic State monthly magazine when they had it. And this is why all roads from the Islamic eschatology point of view, leads to Dabiq.

Understanding even this one tiny example of the fundamental difference in system of thought allows for a large degree of greater understanding in terms of Islam and what it seeks and why.

Another more contemporary example, and one that will set keyboards afire as they object to it, is how Israel had allowed itself to think that Hamas was in fact thinking like Israel does, and was trying to accumulate wealth and build a civilization for their own people and had given up the idea of the destruction of Israel. This I am told, by significant sources, was the reason for Israel’s lack of readiness on Oct. 7 2023. They were not able to understand Islam’s actual core motivations, and therefore Iran’s, The Muslim Brotherhood and its various branch offices like Hamas. Islam, like Nazism has a core belief that motivates their actions. Material comfort and security is not among the attributes. But they do understand how we think very well and use that to their advantage in all propaganda and attacks.

The basic human tendency when looking at huge things is to try and reduce it to the simplest formulae within our own frames of reference. This is because learning another frame of reference is difficult and very few can be bothered to do so, especially when the threat appears to be over. At this point we might all agree that these threats are likely never really over so much as dormant. The “Cold War” with communism being the best current example. And understanding the system of thought of threat doctrines is key to preventing its total victory over us. And it it never really too late to do that even though the later the hour the higher the cost of reconquest.

The current examples of course, are leftism and Islam. Both of which have boat loads more in common with each other than with Western thinkers. And while this may seem counter-intuitive based on leftist and Islamic propaganda, but any self-honest observer can see the truth of it.

In the following two videos, TIK History makes the case that Nazism was also a religion, and an old one at that. A Gnostic cult and provides evidence from Hitler’s own speeches and book. And a case can be made, and it has, that we are fighting the Nazis now. More accurately, the Nazis are fighting us now as we aren’t really fighting back yet. But the COMINTERN, UN, EU and WEF have more in common with Nazis than anyone else except maybe Maoists. And one might argue that would also be a distinction without a difference.

UPDATE: New video from TIK History. Correcting the myth that Hitler was funded by capitalists

 

Stephen Coughlin: The Deep Attack – Marxism’s war on women

Posted on by

I cannot stress enough how good, and how important this is.

In Stephen’s presentation, he uses the illustration of a wild pig trap as an analogy to how we are lured into the blast zone of a dialectical bomb. Its a worthy and effective analogy.

The one below we feel is as good but perhaps for a slightly different aspect of how the COMINTERN states wage information war on us all. The “Two weeks to flatten the curve” is the easiest example, but there are many.

Major Jordan’s diaries on communist subversion of the US back to WW2

Posted on by

This is an astonishing document. As far as I know, only two people were jailed and for a very, very long time for assisting the Soviets to get the nuclear bomb. Yet listening to Major Jordan, it should have been a goodly part of Washington DC. Having read part of the Whittaker Chambers book, Witness, this video makes an excellent companion to his document about the nature of communism in that era, and how penetrated the US, and clearly Canada was at the time.

Partial list of antisemitic attacks in the West, and how hate speech laws cover for them

Posted on by

There is a profound uptick in antisemitic attacks across the West, both by muslims, and their proxies on the left, and by weak organizations that cave to both. The larger threat to democracies of course, are where august organizations submit to demands or threats by muslim groups, and cancel participants, or even speakers or the even the keynote person at an event because they are Jewish, and may or may not have any connection to Israel. It was repugnant when we did it to Russians and it is no less repugnant now. RAIR Foundation wrote up some of those. This one in Australia is an excellent example of the state of democracy there. It also makes one wonder how much of this is the revenge of the Nazis. After all, Soros was a Nazi, Soros funded the vast migration of Muslims into Western lands. Soros worked with all those who effectively criminalized speaking the truth about Islam and its anti-civilizational, antisemitic core dogma and goals out loud.

The results of a vast Muslim migration anywhere are totally predictable. We can say that with some confidence, because this site has been predicting it since 2008 and it started doing so after reading sites like gatesofvienna.net which has been doing it much longer. Not to mention Bill Warner, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders and many many many more. How Geert Wilders has had to live since speaking clear and obvious provable truth about Islam would, back when reason was the foundation of our cultures, been enough to change immigration policies. After all, one needs only look at 1: if there are any minorities in Islamic lands, and where there are, 2: how they are treated, to know how this is going to go. Then there is history, but you have to get a book published before they Winston Smithed them all. Then there is what the jihadis say when they kill a bunch of people. Yet pointing these out are the left equivalent of blasphemy laws, “hate speech”. Like Islamic blasphemy laws, anything which is a threat to the leftist ideology or its enforcers is “hate speech” especially when it’s true. Exactly like blasphemy laws.

Here is a rather stellar example of exactly that:

A few more examples of the effect of mass migration of Muslims into the West from the last number of hours:

Switzerland: RAIR article here.

But it isn’t just we common folk that have to worry at this stage of the replacement:

British lawmakers fear for their safety after threats and abuse over Gaza

LONDON, Feb 28 (Reuters) – It was 10 minutes of shouted accusations of being a “genocide enabler” and having “blood on your hands” that made a British lawmaker fear for his safety over his decision to voice support for Israel in its war with Hamas.
Almost touching noses with his accuser before walking away and warning he would call the police, the opposition Labour Party member said the incident in a town in his constituency was just the latest of several that made him change his behaviour.
He now makes sure he sits near the door on public transport and limits meetings with the public.
“It feels like it could just need one spark to flip from someone giving you tuppence (criticism) in the street to escalating to actual violence,” the lawmaker said.
After the Oct. 7 Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza, more than 10 British politicians spoken to by Reuters said the abuse directed at them had become more intense. At least one cited this as a factor in deciding not to seek a new term in parliament in an election later this year.

A group of Muslims in Ottawa Canada has used the logo of the University of Ottawa to brand its propaganda:

Continue Reading →

No news, but 5 explainer videos on Islamic and communist, global manifest destiny (All good)

Posted on by

1. The multi-hour Senator Ron Johnson on the pandemic measures including the vaxx. This was watched up to over an hour by a reader, who recommends it highly, even for those who have followed the issue as a proper summary of events so far.
Please start at 29 minutes 40 seconds where it begins.

2. Interesting grilling of UK politician for telling even a watered down, neutered version of the truth concerning the influence of Islam on UK institutions. My favorite part is near the start when the mass media host asks the politician if he can even ask the question. The proper answer would have been, “You are the media, YOU decide what can be asked and what must never be asked. what you are really saying is how dare I ask it”. That would have shown some savvy. Even still, this video is a lesson, like so much on this site, as to how far down the communist revolution the Anglosphere (Oceana) has gone.

3. 2005 lecture on why Nazism was Socialism. In case anyone doesn’t get that yet. TIK History does a more detailed deep dive on Hitler and his philosophy. But this is a great primer on the basics.

4. When you hear President Nixon explain what we call, ‘Petty Tyranny’ in the public service you know why they had to destroy him. In the private sector, petty tyrants also exist. But they usually don’t last long.

5. Black Pigeon Speaks: On the Cold War 2.0. On the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, and China, Turkey and other nation’s resistance to the neo-communist model of the West.

Tucker Carlson with Mao era Chinese ex-pat describe the Cultural Revolution in China and now in the USA

Posted on by

Canadians watching can decide if the same applies in Canada. Same for Germany, Sweden, hell let’s just call it all Oceana.

Related unrelated: Today at 11:00 is the protest at Parliament Hill against Trudeau’s bill to have the state kill the mentally ill, People who in many cases, can’t give legal consent to anything. Yesterday Trudeau’s politburo passed a censorship bill that takes things to the next level. More on that later.

 

Fascinating video on the same communist-Islamic confluence at German University

Posted on by

People who follow this site may have seen some of the videos we have posted on the anti-nation-state protests under a veneer of anti-Israel protests, itself a layered veneer of an anti-war protest. But like most anti-War protests throughout the 20th century, they are in fact pro-war protests but on the other side.

In these cases, it’s anti-counter-revolution protests. Like most things these days.

Let’s look at the tape:

If you read the article at RAIR, you also get a solid idea of the use of these protests to insert antisemitic narratives as well.

Below, another protest in Ottawa outside a building on Laurier that houses The Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries. This appears to have been organized by the Marxist Leninist Party of Canada which.. well doesn’t really directly relate to the Israel Gaza conflict one might not think. Here is alink to one of their pages, although its difficult to find a link to past events. Mostly just the ones coming up. You can see the most enthusiastic flag wavers are from this org. https://cpcml.ca/ As usual, please click the little gear at the bottom tight of the play window and select highest quality to make out the details of the video.

Here are links to a couple of previous videos in Ottawa with a much more detailed explanation of the communist/leftist nature of these protests all over the place in the West

From Nov 2023: The Crescent and the Hammer: Ottawa’s Disturbing Convergence of Islam and Communism on Canada’s Parliament Hill

Palestinian Protests in Ottawa Unmask Intersectional Agenda Against Israel and the West

One of the most interesting Substacks, is this fellow, Eugyppius. If memory serves, Alex Berenson actually posts his stuff from time to time. he has a great article about attending one of these protests, although this one was against the AfD in Dreden and writes it up from the PoV of an attendee. Its quite interesting. 

So that is several examples from Ottawa and now two from Germany. One with video. If you made it this far and read the articles, there should be a pretty solid understanding of what these are all about. Especially when you add the George Soros Factor.

The Trans-dialectic and the perpetual communist revolution

Posted on by

First, the newest example of how the communist revolution steamrolls over whoever cannot keep up.

From the Daily Mail: LGBT hook-up app Grindr is accused of discriminating against GAYS by Stonewall riots hero: Will let users search specifically for transgender men or women – but not biological males because that’s ‘transphobic’

Gay hook-up app Grindr has been blasted by a Stonewall rioter for not letting users search specifically for biological men and claiming that doing so is transphobic.

But Grindr, which is largely used by gay men, does let users search specifically for transgender users, claiming that it is ‘critical for this community to be able to find each other easily.’ 

The policy has angered veteran gay rights activist Fred Sargeant, who rioted at Stonewall in 1969 and others who say it’s hypocritical. 

The app, which is run by George Arison, a conservative gay man, claims that allowing users to filter out transgender users would ‘further perpetuate discrimination and harm for the trans and non binary community.’

“A conservative Gay man”. Ok then.

Remember J K Rowling? She was a feminist. But then the revolution ran her over as well. She didn’t think that men pretending to be women, and competing against women in areas where men had a clear, objective biological advantage was good for women. So the revolution destroyed her as best they could since it isn’t technically a crime yet to object to revolutionary values as it is in the UK for example.

By this point, everyone has noticed that things in all categories have moved farther and farther to the left. The pendulum theory tends to satisfy most people. That some magic fulcrum exists which over corrects for bad things leading to bad things on the other side of the scale. It doesn’t. All systems, both classic governmental ones and social/cultural ones are tuned to moving things ever leftwards, meaning more state control and less individual rights.

Here are just a few examples of how this works.

Gay marriage was never meant to give rights to homosexuals to live as they pleased. They already could. And a civil union would have allowed homosexuals to enjoy the same assumed rights, like hospital visits and next of kin, as would marriage.

In a conversation with a veteran MSM reporter the other day, his complaint was that the right didn’t want to allow a civil union, and the left wasn’t satisfied with anything other than redefining marriage to include 2 people of the same sex. He explained patiently to me, that this is why we are so far to the left. The intractability of both sides.

He was half right. The left wouldn’t accept anything other then the total deconstruction of the nature of marriage itself. It was, yes, a dialectic attack on a core institution of Western Civilization. To render it meaningless by redefining it to include something totally unrelated to a commitment to stay together through adversity, ideally for the sake of a potential family. And between the two components actually required in order to create a baby, and which through 99.9% history was the consequence of sexual desire between two opposite sex people, and for 99.9% of all the species on earth above a plant, and including most plants. (Aphids clone themselves. This may be the ultimate expression of what communists want for us. Brave New World etc.)

The point is, that this journalist, who had observed decades of concessions to communist deconstruction of components of our civilization, could only see it from the points of view presented on each issue. He was therefore unable to see the inevitable outcome of this strategy. Which is that everything will be moved to the left as people argue the issues as presented, and thereby make concessions where none needed to be granted. The article at the top of this post is not the end point. It is just where we are now. Gay people, who had benefitted for a while from the communist use of both perceived and real discrimination against people who are homosexual, are now not even able to select what they are attracted to.

This is in part why this author committed to abandoning making jokes of logical extremes over 10 years ago. In this case, going back 20 years, the joke might have been, ‘next thing you know, you will be called a racist for preferring opposite sex partners.

In fact there is a meme going around that still sort of works. I think the punch line was, “I’m leaving before they make it mandatory”.

If one person says that 2+2=4 and 100 people say that 2+2=25, the truth remains that 2+2=4. But in the revolutionary logic, incremental concessions are made until it equals whatever the state wants it to equal at any given time. And now you know why math is racist. Math you see, is a process created by ancient greek thought, but also Indian and Persian, which perpetuates Western Civilization, and as WC (Western Civilization) is inherently racist, they would argue, and so math is also racist for supporting WC. So the answer has to be made malleable.

The Grindr story we feel is an important one at the strategic level, as it is such an excellent example of what is actually being done to us, rather than what people think is being done to us from surface conversations about changes in WC.

For another example, abortion as in Canada being available till the last second before birth, and MAiD being offered to young healthy people who have a temporary and sometimes common issue that can lead to suicidal ideation, (being dumped by a love interest for example) has arguments on both sides that can be made to seem very reasonable, and for which, at least for a while, a compromise can be reached. But if you consider that Abortion in an age of easy and free birth control and MAiD was already in practice except quietly for those already at death’s door with no hope, one might look at the strategic. The dialectical arguments lead to compromise. But the purpose is the destruction of the Judeo-Christian belief in the sanctity of life. That is must hold value. The ultimate value. And must be preserved.

This post gives the following video a practical application in terms of the creation of ‘trans’ as a communist dialectic attack.

The dialectic of the destruction of male and females as a biological reality and as archetypes, become wrecking balls for all orders. Especially ones concerning sex, and sexual preferences.

Stephen Coughlin is fond of quoting a Rabbi he works with: “It’s time to stop seeing what you know, and start knowing what you see”.

It’s time to stop arguing the sides handed to you by the enemy and start considering what happens when you abandon truth as the only metric that matters for determining your society’s rules.

No matter how many people insist 2+2= 5, it’s still 4.