Category Archives: Selective enforcement

Hamed Abdel-Samad’s Twitter Account Deleted

Posted on by

Update: Twitter have restated Hamed’s account. Thank you to all of you who supported him!
Today, Friday November 3rd (CET), Hamed Abdel Samad noted that his twitter account @hamed_samad was deleted without prior notice.

Egyptian-German author and scholar Hamed Abdel-Samad.

Coincidentally, the last post he had shared on Twitter was his Facebook message of
November 1:

If within just one year, hundreds of Christian terrorists carried out acts of terror in more than 50 states, invoking the Bible in doing so, then most media would speak of Christian terrorism without batting an eyelid – and rightfully so. Times Magazine spoke of Buddhist terror, referring to violence against Muslims in Burma. But when the terrorists are Muslims, invoking the Koran, then they refuse to see a connection to Islam.
We do not defame all Muslims when we speak of Islamic terrorism. Not all Muslims put everything into action that is written in the Koran. Some just put into action what feels similar to them. Peaceful humans will choose the peaceful passages, and say, this is the message of the Koran. We like these Muslims, and we do not call them “selective”, but “liberal”, or “moderate”. Violent people invoke the violent passages and say, this is what God expects from us. We do not like these Muslims, and we say they are radical and misunderstand the Koran.
The fact that most Muslims do not commit acts of violence is not thanks to Islam. Islam expects of Muslims to pray five times a day in the Mosque. Very few Muslims do that. Is it due to Islam that they neglect this obligation? Islam demands that Muslims work diligently, not lie at the court, and keep the streets clean. Do all Muslims do accordingly? Islam permits man to marry four women at the same time. Very few Muslims use this permission. Islam legitimizes violence against unbelievers, legitimizes discrimination of religious minorities, and beating of women. The fact that many Muslims do not do any of this is not thanks to Islam, but thanks to the pragmatism and reason of the people who don’t do these things.
It is correct to say that not each single decision and each single deed of a Muslim can be attributed to Islam only, but at the same time, we cannot say: cleanliness, diligence, honesty, polygamy, hatred for unbelievers, violence against women, discrimination of minorities and praying five times a day have nothing to do with Islam!
Terror has got many causes that need to come together so that a person will become a terrorist. The social situation, the political situation in the world, the structure of his personality all play a role in that. But the religion and what it says about Jihad and the unbelievers, and what it promises the martyr after death, are central causes. So why is it defamation to say what we can empirically prove?

Hamed Abdel Samad’s twitter profile, @hamed_samad, as of November 3rd, 2PM CDET.

Toronto Star and imam double down on denial

Posted on by

Like the Clintons and sticking to the con, and like Trudeau and his verbal strategy of total cognitive dissonance, the Toronto Star is doubling down on their article defending a genocidal imam, and making him the victim of racism and those who exposed him as the villains.

Honest Reporting’s new article on it today:

The video in question:

Previous article on this issue.

 

London Mayor avoids questions about Hizb’allah marching on London streets

Posted on by

Pretty sure I have posted this before, but in the context of Paul Weston’s tweet:

It deserves to be seen again.

LIVE STREAM FOX NEWS Hannity on at 9:00 ET

Posted on by

Key for decrypting 2day’s boom
4767H
5774A
6a7aN
4d6cN
6330I
666bT
314aY
3453B
0000L
0907O
84b4W
7616S
86f7T
a737R
5707U
5736M
7487P

THE TWEET BELOW IS FROM A FAKE ASSANGE ACCOUNT. Mia Maxima Culpa.

Please report any problems with the streaming of this video in comments

Posted on by

This is a very old video we made some years ago which was purged from Youtube. Bitchute seems to offer a platform where 1970s style free speech is allowed again.

So please report any issues with the playing of it in comments. I find that for me, it only plays in FireFox and the other browsers I use try to get me to download it as a bit torrent. If you want the file, thats great, but if you just want to play it then and there, it is not.

For anyone who has an issue with the subject matter, please see the video below:

If this can be on national and international TV to great applause and awards, then the top video should be every bit as appreciated.

Poland Takes up the Case of Michael Stürzenberger

Posted on by

Michael Stürzenberger is a writer, political activist, and stalwart of the Counterjihad in Germany, especially in Munich. A couple of weeks ago we wrote about the conviction of Mr. Stürzenberger for posting a photo on Facebook of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem shaking hands with a Nazi during the Second World War (see the article and interview about the conviction of Michael Stürzenberger). His crime was “inciting hatred towards Islam”. The court sentenced him to six months in prison — for sharing an accurate historical artifact.

It was encouraging to learn today that Poland has championed Michael Stürzenberger’s case at an official level, and will take Germany to task at the Council of Europe for its failure to uphold freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Germany is a signatory. A persecuted dissident must find it bracing to receive the backing of the governing party of a sovereign nation and member state of the European Union.

Many thanks to Ava Lon for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

Please read the rest at Gates of Vienna.Net

Here is the video interview with Michael shortly after his sentence was pronounced.

Expelled leader of Australia’s far left Labour Party on Rebel Media program

Posted on by

Rebel Oz. A 50 minute show where we see that Australia is dealing with exactly the same set of problems, leftist tilting of reason, and special laws for muslims.

(Oz-Rita informs us that Mark Latham was the Leader of the Australian Labor Party (and very left at the time). Now that he has “turned” he has actually be EXPULSED from the Labor Party.)

Here he is on Andrew Bolt:

Finland: Police selectively enforce who can film based on leftist politics

Posted on by

Regular readers of this site may remember an interview with Finnish city councilman, Junes Lokka. Yesterday he was arrested for filming an ANTIFA counter-demo against citizens for freedom of speech, while standing next to many other people also filming the same event. His girlfriend’s video and explanation is below:

The original interview with Junes Lokka from April 30, 2017 is below:

 

It is forbidden to say that the suspects are foreigners

Posted on by

An original translation by Gary Fousequak with much thanks!

From this Italian news site:

 

 

Even in the face of the horror of a group rape against a girl, the politically correctness softens the blow.

Alessandro Sallusti -Mon, 28/08/2017 – 15:32

Even in the face of the horror of a group rape against a girl, the political-correctness softens the blow. Rape is an infamous crime, regardless of who commits it.

But the point is: why not say who, or rather who is being sought as the alleged persons responsible, as what is happening in the case of the girl raped on the beach of Rimini? Readers of most of yesterday’s daily newspapers and news broadcasts, which have also reserved a lot of room for the matter, do not know or have the slightest idea, reading through the lines, that the police are hunting for three Maghreb (Northern African) immigrants.

Will they be the ones found guilty? We do not know, but the news is that investigators are looking for them. So why not say it, why not give public opinion the identity of the possible killer, as in all cases of black chronicle since the (beginning) of time?

We are confident that if the raped girl and her wounded partner reported being attacked instead of by dark-skinned people, by (ethnic) Italians, there would not have been all these precautions and silence. And the titles would have been more or less: “A gang of blondes rape a young tourist.”

Again, today no one knows the truth, but investigators know well who they are looking for, journalists know the track beaten by investigators, newspaper directors know well what journalists know. Everyone knows, but no one dare say and write clearly. We are so concerned that immigrants, compared to us Italians, are not only protected by the system when they occupy a home but also when they are suspected of raping a girl.

It is the damn virus with which the Boldrinis and Savianos have infected the country, a reverse racism even protected by the Order of Journalists who investigates and punishes those who dare to vaccinate themselves, that is to call things by their own name.
I recently was under investigation for an article: “They try to kidnap a child, the police clean out a Roma (Gypsy) camp”, which faithfully reported the facts. I claim the freedom to inform you that the police, for the facts of Rimini, are looking for three immigrants, which means nothing more and nothing less than what is happening in these hours.

We will not be politically correct but professional, yes. And that’s enough for us.

German Court Rules: Polygamy Not Against the Constitution

Posted on by

An original translation from Stuttgarter Zeitung by Egri Nök.

German Top Court Decides:
German Passport And Two Wives: Both Is Permittable
By Eberhard Wein
August 27, 2017

According to the Koran, a man can marry a second woman; but in Germany, too, this is not against the constitution. At least this is what the two highest administrative law judges say. Photo: ‘Arab with Three Wives and Two Servants’, Wikimedia Commons

A Syrian, who is married to two wives, can still become a German national. The city of Karlsruhe cannot revoke his naturalization, the administative court says.

Karlsruhe – if you contract a second marriage abroad, you can still be a good and loyal citizen. This is the gist of a verdict of the administrative court (VGH) in Mannheim. The highest administrative law judges of the country repealed a contrarian decision by the administrative court Karlsruhe. The city of Karlsruhe had revoked German citizenship from a native of Syria, after it surfaced that he had married a second wife in his old homeland.
The 36 year old Kurd came to Germany in 1999, studied and became a construction engineer in 2008. He married a German that same year, and applied for German citizenship shortly thereafter. At the naturalization test, he scored 33 out of 33 possible points. He received his naturalization certificate in October 2010.

Shortly after the wedding he married a second wife
In 2010, 2013 and 2015, three children were born. But then the man recognized fatherhood for another child born in Damascus in 2012. What surfaced now led to the city of Karlsruhe revoking the naturalization. The man allegedly had married another woman in Syria, already in June 2008, only seven weeks after his marriage in Germany. The charge is that he had given incomplete information in his application.
In the verdict, the administrative court leaves open the question if the plaintiff gained naturalization by willful deceit. It is true that the application form only asked for “previous marriages” and not “additional marriages”. Still, the judges of the previous instance were not wrong to say that a second marriage should have been stated “all the more”. But at the same time, the senate does not share the administrative court’s opinion that the principle of singular marriage was part of the constitution.

Marriage saved woman from ostracism
The city of Karlsruhe had argued that polygamy violated the dignity of man as guaranteed in article 1 [of the German constitution – translator] – in the judges’ opinion “an absolutely unique legal opinion”. They pointed to a decision by the administrative court Regensburg: Who violates the principle of single marriage, is not necessary an “enemy of the constitution”, it said “boldly and correctly”.
In the case at hand, the court also acknowledged the special circumstances. The plaintiff said that he had married the woman, his cousin, because their affair from the year 2006, was busted. Only this way he were able to save her from social ostracism in Syria. His Muslim belief allowed a multiple marriage. At the same time, he admitted, he could not imagine to be one of several husbands.

Case of fundamental importance
After detours over Istanbul, Abu Dhabi and Sweden, the wife now lives in Karlsruhe, too, but in an apartment of her own. His first wife always knew of her, allegedly. There would be no marital contact. The city of Karlsruhe already lodged an appeal against the verdict. The administrative court allowed the revision at the Federal Administrative Court. „We deem the clarification of this legal matter of fundamental importance for generality and consistency”, a townsspeaker said.
(File Reference 12 S 2216/14).

Oh well, now that they are here and we can’t or won’t send them away, we might as well give them work permits and federal funds

Posted on by

An original translation from German daily newspaper Hamburger Abendblatt:

Merkel and Scholz: Integrate Rejected Asylum Seekers
By Christoph Heinemann and Christian Unger
25.08.17

Olaf Scholz, mayor of Hamburg, and Angela Merkel

Abendblatt exclusive: Access to language courses and Federal Funds
Merkel formed task team in response to Scholz’ Motion

Hamburg/Berlin.
The lost ones meet every Friday evening in a cafe in the Schanze. Seven young Afghans without a perspective to stay – as their asylum application has either been in process for more than one year, or has been decided upon negatively, they aren’t allowed to work or to visit a proper language course*.
Several thousand of such people, often merely “tolerated” for years, live in Hamburg.
Mayor Olaf Scholz (SPD, Social Democrats) apparently wants to grant these people extensive assistance measures. As Abendblatt learnt exclusively, already in June a task force was formed upon decision of chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU, Christian Democrats), which is to develop suggestions. Members of this task force are representatives of Senate, the Chief of the Federal Agency for Work, Detlef Scheele (SPD), as well as leaders of Saarland which is led by the CDU. In November, the group is expected to present their findings at a meeting of the Federal Presidents.

Scholz wants to give rejected asylum seekers a perspective
Olaf Scholz (SPD) had put the topic on the agenda at a meeting of the minister presidents, according to sources in the Senate. The plan is to assist all those asylum seekers more, who do not have a safe perspective to stay, but who de facto will be in Germany for a longer period of time. “You need to face reality and give these people a chance, too”, a source neaer Scholz said. The chief of the Agency for Work and former Senator for Social issues, Detlef Scheele, allegedly is also among the advocates for better assitance of the affected peole.

Possible reforms are politically sensitive
A source close to the mayor says that several concrete steps are possible: the admission of people fro countries like Afghanistan into integration courses of the Federal Agency for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) and better care by the Federal Agency for Work, and faster issue of work permits.
According to the source, in the future, also foreigners who are merely tolerated** might be able to profit from assistance programmes, for example the Federal Agency for Work might pay for part of their wage, to encourage giving work to refugees. The focus of the efforts is intended to be on people who have already been living in Hamburg and in other federal states for a few years with an insecure perspective of staying.
Speaker of Senate, Jörg Schmoll, did not want to comment on the task force and the suggestions upon request. A speaker of the Federal Agency for Work merely confirmed that Detlef Scheele would deliver a presentation at the next meeting of the minister presidents. The making available of funds for (rejected) asylum seekers is politically sensitive. Normally, a “tolerance” (suspension of deportation) is only issued when a deportation cannot be carried out for concrete reasons, for example illness. But in fact, deportations to Afghanistan are extremely rare, due to the situation in that country. In Hamburg, Afghans make for the largest group of asylum seekers and refugees, even before the Syrians.

Translator’s notes:
*  “aren’t allowed to work or to visit a proper language course”
Every foreigner in Germany, legal or illegal, may sign up for the many language courses available on the free market. So what is meant by “proper language course” must be public-funded language courses with no tuition fee
** “tolerated”, “geduldet”, is a legal term for people who are in Germany illegally, but who are not deported for a variety of reasons

Interview with Michael Stürzenberger on his 6 month jail sentence for posting historical fact

Posted on by