Partial list of antisemitic attacks in the West, and how hate speech laws cover for them

There is a profound uptick in antisemitic attacks across the West, both by muslims, and their proxies on the left, and by weak organizations that cave to both. The larger threat to democracies of course, are where august organizations submit to demands or threats by muslim groups, and cancel participants, or even speakers or the even the keynote person at an event because they are Jewish, and may or may not have any connection to Israel. It was repugnant when we did it to Russians and it is no less repugnant now. RAIR Foundation wrote up some of those. This one in Australia is an excellent example of the state of democracy there. It also makes one wonder how much of this is the revenge of the Nazis. After all, Soros was a Nazi, Soros funded the vast migration of Muslims into Western lands. Soros worked with all those who effectively criminalized speaking the truth about Islam and its anti-civilizational, antisemitic core dogma and goals out loud.

The results of a vast Muslim migration anywhere are totally predictable. We can say that with some confidence, because this site has been predicting it since 2008 and it started doing so after reading sites like gatesofvienna.net which has been doing it much longer. Not to mention Bill Warner, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders and many many many more. How Geert Wilders has had to live since speaking clear and obvious provable truth about Islam would, back when reason was the foundation of our cultures, been enough to change immigration policies. After all, one needs only look at 1: if there are any minorities in Islamic lands, and where there are, 2: how they are treated, to know how this is going to go. Then there is history, but you have to get a book published before they Winston Smithed them all. Then there is what the jihadis say when they kill a bunch of people. Yet pointing these out are the left equivalent of blasphemy laws, “hate speech”. Like Islamic blasphemy laws, anything which is a threat to the leftist ideology or its enforcers is “hate speech” especially when it’s true. Exactly like blasphemy laws.

Here is a rather stellar example of exactly that:

A few more examples of the effect of mass migration of Muslims into the West from the last number of hours:

Switzerland: RAIR article here.

But it isn’t just we common folk that have to worry at this stage of the replacement:

British lawmakers fear for their safety after threats and abuse over Gaza

LONDON, Feb 28 (Reuters) – It was 10 minutes of shouted accusations of being a “genocide enabler” and having “blood on your hands” that made a British lawmaker fear for his safety over his decision to voice support for Israel in its war with Hamas.
Almost touching noses with his accuser before walking away and warning he would call the police, the opposition Labour Party member said the incident in a town in his constituency was just the latest of several that made him change his behaviour.
He now makes sure he sits near the door on public transport and limits meetings with the public.
“It feels like it could just need one spark to flip from someone giving you tuppence (criticism) in the street to escalating to actual violence,” the lawmaker said.
After the Oct. 7 Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza, more than 10 British politicians spoken to by Reuters said the abuse directed at them had become more intense. At least one cited this as a factor in deciding not to seek a new term in parliament in an election later this year.

A group of Muslims in Ottawa Canada has used the logo of the University of Ottawa to brand its propaganda:

Continue Reading →

One of the most significant interviews posted to Vlad: Former Intel chief in Germany on the plot to destroy the nation through mass migration

This will be updates later with significantly more information about the interview subject, Hans-Georg Maaßen. But for now, please watch and pay attention up to the last word.

Special thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation. More on this at RAIR

A few years ago, we covered incidents in a town called Chemnitz in Germany. Going by memory, an illegal migrant welcomed by Merkel, raped and killed a woman in that town. In fact many people had been killed by muslim migrants in Chemnitz. The residents had enough and did a march and demonstration with the photos of the victims. ANTIFA had their own weaponized media there and had arranged to have a migrant attacked by people who appeared to be with the demonstration. A classic False Flag that would have made Hitler or Trudeau flush with pride.

As memory serves, they had a migrant harass and otherwise bother protestors until a few of them broke away and chased him away. The chasing away of course, was filmed and broadcast. I guess a variant of what George Soros would call using ‘reactivity’. Like when Muslim terrorists wage a second attack against the first responders to the initial attack.

The German state used this false-flag attack to justify clamping down on the right of the people of Chemnitz to grieve publicly and demand they be protected from illegals.

But the man who was head of what one might say is the equivalent of the Inteligence Oversight in Germany, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the man in the interview above, revealed the facts about the attack. Shortly after, he was removed from his position. Much like General Vance in Canada for refusing to attack the people of Canada with a disinformation operation, except he was taken out of the armed services, while Hans was moved to a different position with a similar salary but wouldn’t be as much of a threat to state tactics.

Here are some links of stories we did at the time. The servers where the videos had been stored are now gone. But as time permits I will try and find them and restore them somewhere else.

Remember the alleged “migrant hunt” in Chemnitz?

Here is one of the key videos restored that tells the story as it happened:

More may be added later. But this should be enough to get a pretty clear picture as to who Hans-Georg Maasen is and the events that brought Germany to where it is now.

UPDATE: Here is a video exposing one of the “Nazis” in Chemnitz as actually being a communist activist.

Interview with Irish journalist abut the total destruction of Ireland as an entity by immigration

Please read the story details about our interview subject and the nature of this interview at RAIR Foundation

Exceptional excerpt of Geert Wilders speech in Parliament on the cost of mass immigration

One can read the description at RAIR Foundation

Physical fight breaks out between current and previous PMs of Slovakia

This is a tough one to break down. The details as they are understood, are at RIAR Foundation on this one.

My take on it is that the COMINTERN in the form of the EU made a deal with the Slovak mafia to get a leader in who would do their bidding by lying his way in claiming he would stop mass Islamic and African migration and the exodus of actual ethnic Slovaks due to increasingly impossible living conditions for them in Slovakia. Aufhaben der Menchen. The previous PM inserted himself into a presser using a truck loaded with loud speakers and accused the current government of bieng mobsters who are destroying Slovakia.

This came to physical blows.

There is article here from the Storiest.com that seems to detail this as well.

Italian MEP manages to maintain some semblance of women’s rights in the face of Islamic invasion of Europe

Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation

Trans-person makes protest in Sweden against the raw facts of Islam, and Islamic immigration

This is an interesting one. Whoever this guy is, he knows Islam clean down to the ground. Also noteworthy is that people typically associated with far left groups such as transvestites/transexuals in particular, usually support other destructive lines of effort against Western Civ such as Islamic immigration. So this is interesting on that level as well.

RAIR Article here.

Swedish parliamentarian, Swedish SD Member of the Riksdag, Richard Jomshof speaks on Islam and its consequences to Sweden and Europe

Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation

At last we have a measured, calm and lucid member of a European Parliament that speaks about Islam in the most plain and accurate language, and in a way not easily triggering to the leftist dialectical engineers. In other words, the agents of repressive tolerance and other weaponized language tactics of the left as they have been deployed on us for the last 100 years. This is a VERY good interview. Please watch it and spread it and hopefully we can find a way to support him. If Sweden is to have a chance, this would be the guy who could create it for them. Sweden has its own energy, like Canada. So there is no need for them to be at the behest of oil producing muslim countries.

MEP Gunnar Beck: Germany is becoming the Lebanon of Central Europe

Please read the details at RAIR Foundation

Three videos from the past dozen years or so, that reveal what the UN really is, and what they really plan to do to its member states

Like the EU and other supranational organizations, their current intention, if not at founding but now certainly, is to dissolve the polities that make up their constituency and remake them as all one thing under their rule. If one could come up with a Latin phrase for that, it might be solve et coagula. 

Below are three videos that I hope will convince the reader that this is the case. None of these are exactly opinion videos. One is the head of the UN himself explaining how freedom of speech must be eliminated world wide. The other two deal with a motion passed by the UN to which all left-leaning Western nations, which is damn nearly all of them, conformed. Once you see them, you will recognize the effects of the UN migration compact in our own immigration policies, and how they are reported on.

This first one is a dissident group within the EU trying to stop the UN Global Compact on Migration. It is accurately described. Notice how he describes what we know to be the Discourse Theory method of criminalizing opposition to the consensus view, in this case on dialectic negation of local populations through mass migration.

Below, the ONE report I have ever seen that was an honest report at the UN about what that body had passed:

This last one is the head of the UN himself. A life long communist. He explains how he is going to negate all freedom of speech world wide. I post this one from time to time, so if you have seen it before, you are forgiven if you skip this one.

Lebanese immigrant to Europe makes video epitaph for Germany

Please read the story on the author of this video over at RAIR

The perfect example of Frankfurt School Discourse theory: Making opposition to govt. policy illegal

At a dinner once, I was given a licence to only say the word, “Dialectic” three times. After that, no dessert. So I learned to save it for the best uses.

This video below is a stellar example of the Frankfurt School’s Discourse theory. The way that works, is that a communist think-tank comes up with a concept they want to force onto the mainstream. They call that “a consensus”. Usually its to impose a pseudo-reality onto the public at the expense of reality. Often really obvious untruths like men can make themselves real women just by saying they are, and any attempt to stop them from all aspects of female life is a semi-crime.

The way this is done, is to make any opposition to the consensus, “hate-speech”. This is a form of dialectics. Targeted use of language and concepts to always force the culture farther and farther to the left. Examples are easy. Critical race theory. Critical gender theory. Global Warming, which if there was any honesty in the left, would be called, “critical climate theory”.

In this case, it was the Spanish Parliament. A VOX member was making the case that unbridled and massive illegal immigration resulted in certain kinds of criminality.

When he made this case, he was reminded by the president of that parliament, I assume equivalent to the Speaker of the House or Speaker of a British style Parliamentary system, that to equate immigration with crime was illegal and he must take it back and not do it again. There is zero consideration as to the truth or falsity, or even consequences to his claim. It’s that it is a claim that may not be made.

This would be because the plan is to flood the West with African and Islamic migrants with no vetting in order to prepare it for the death of all of its concepts of national identity and individual rights and replace it with an authoritarian essentially Marxist Leninist state, as they are preparing us for in Canada as well under Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau.

Normally the use of Discourse Theory is a little harder to spot. Slightly more subtle. Just real enough to make you sort of accept it while you get that increasingly familiar buzzing in your head from trying to accept what makes no logical sense. But this exchange in the Spanish Parliament was deliciously clear cut. Habermas’ Discourse theory perfectly applied in a Parliamentary situation such that no factual reference to the consequences of the massive invasion of Spain can be made. Not even it seems, pointing out that Illegal immigration is in fact, illegal.

Keep an eye on Stephen Coughlin’s Twitter feed. One suspects he will have something to say about this one.

Below, a refresher course on exactly what Discourse Theory is and how it is applied:

Please also see RAIR Foundation’s write up on the Spanish video

 

Tucker Carlson for September 26th, 2022, Critical Theory attacks by MSM against Meloni

The opening is all on Giorgia Meloni and its excellent. He actually checked the sources on her rather than the critical theory media attacks which is all we get to see outside, and probably inside italy. An example of that is below the Tucker show.

For those who are not yet familiar with critical theory, a strategic use of language to destroy any target that is an obstacle to a communist revolution, watch the following video in short chunks and think about what you have heard. For example, when he says she wants to use a “blockade to stop immigration”, but doesn’t say illegal, we get a solid sense of the deceptive nature of this attack. But even if she was to stop immigration to Italy altogether, why is a national leader’s policy on immigration unacceptable when it is opposed and the natural order of things when its for open unlimited and unvetted immigration? In any case, this entire screed is a series of hatred and half truths. But its an important lesson in Critical Theory.

 

Dutch Government acts out against Dutch Farmers who they have illegally disenfranchised in the name of AGW

AGW of course means Anthropogenic Global Warming. And the farmers are accused of generating nitrogen. Nitrogen is 78% of the Earth’s atmosphere. So I think we can all agree that science has nothing to do with political decisions anymore if they ever did since the beginning of the communist revolution across the Developed World. (Please see table below)

What we get are lying slogans instead of anything factual enough to give a predicible result. Those who do accurately predict the results are called “conspiracy theorists”. Usually followed hard-on by being called, “Racists, misogynists, far right White supremacists” and any combination of, plus any other adjective that adds odiousness.

On to the Netherlands then:

Tensions are high in the Netherland. Now Dutch Cops are pulling weapons on unarmed citizens and shooting. Stills are from videos posted below:

This article actually mentions that police shot at demonstrators:

Farmers’ blockades ‘will cost supermarkets tens of millions’

There will be a great deal more on this soon no doubt at all. Please check this post’s comments for related materials, the Reader’s Links and later today, RAIR Foundation for a more detailed and less chaotic post on the issue.

UPDATE:

FAKE NEWS ON SHOOTING
FAKE NEWS ON TRACTOR SHOOTING
NETHERLANDS, NOS News, 05.07.
?? The newscaster reads out what was editorialized. And that was wrong. In the Dutch news, the shooting at a tractor is presented as if it was in self-defense. That is not correct.
?? The speaker mentions that they were not warning shots, but targeted shots (nl.: “directed”), because the tractors were driving towards the police officers (nl.: “agents”) in a targeted way. This was not the case. The tractors drove past the police.
If the tractor with trailer had driven just a little slower, the tractor driver might have been hit.
??A striking thing about the shooter is that he was filmed for quite some time with his gun drawn and also pointed it at at least one passenger car.
??Dutch farmers are apparently being deliberately defamed by media misrepresentations.