Category Archives: Islamic antisemitism

A reader to this site submitted this video to the Reader’s Links on the Druze people, their religion and origins and alliances in the Middle East.

It is of course, impossible to discuss religion without politics when one side of a conflict Is Islam. Because Islam is politics with a religious justification and nearly nothing else. Quoting one Christian 14th century Emperor, who was also quoted by a Catholic Pope that mysteriously retired out of office, giving way to the communist, Pope Francis, “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

First, the video on the Druze. Then a few thoughts of my own.

Accurate? Yes at least compared to all reporting we have seen on the issue. It eclipses the NYT for instance, and infinitely so for all the influential media that doesn’t report on it at all.

(As an aside, at this late stage of the revolution, influential media has come to mean something different. It is more a question of the state media pumping out a narrative attack, and the government using that narrative attack to implement policy, rather than so many people listen to it that they make decisions based on the information they get from it. CBC in Canada has dropped to a staggeringly low amount of viewers, but it’s still influential in the sense that it is prophetic. What they say, heralds a restrictive new policy that no one would ever vote for if it was presented honestly)

The video in our estimate leaves a few questions though.

1. What are the motives for the Islamic attacks on the Druze?

2. Why is there so little publicity on real attempted genocides by Muslims against all other peoples?

3. Why is the media siding with Islamic narratives when it comes to Israel, even when all parties know it is factually inaccurate? And no, it is not actually antisemitism, (although the resurgence of it is definitely a creation of the captured media working with Islam.)

First, a basic understanding of Islam is required. Islam has a lot of rules, laws and directives for its believers. But if one were to put them all in a blender, reduce them for a few hours and pour out the essence, it would read that Muslims must do everything they can do to increase the influence of Islam, both in area of influence and extent.

Maliki, the founder of one of the main schools of Islamic jurisprudence, made it clear that all Muslims should wage jihad against the unbeliever at least once a year. And to be extra-exceptionally clear, Jihad always, always meant actual violent warfare against the infidel to make Islam the only system of human organization possible on Earth. The idea of it being a kind of inner struggle for self betterment is a 20th century invention by a historical revisionist as part of the overall leftist and Islamic plot to allow Islam to be a destructive force against the West by deception. All Islamic and even non Islamic references to jihad prior to that are about warfare against the non-Muslim. (*Source: The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise)

One of these directives is that any land ever held by Muslims is in perpetuity, Islamic lands. That they have a legal right to rule it as per sharia. Spain for instance, is considered an Islamic land by Sharia, and Osama Bin Laden made a video that circulated not too long after 911 making it clear that Spain would be retaken by islam as per their legal right. That video has vanished. But I would go to court and swear on having seen it, and even having it on a hard drive of my own once upon a time.

So the attacks on the Druze, the Jewish people in Israel, and other groups in what they call, “Dar al Islam” or the world of Islam is motivated by the ferocious drive for Islamic Manifest Destiny. The excuses they give are to sell it to the West.  The Justification for Islamic atrocities because *-Insert-victim narrative here.*

The Druze are also the single most loyal group to Israel there is. More by far than left wing Jewish people are in the West. So the forces of Islam have a lot of reasons to try and exterminate the Druze people. None of them are because they are a threat to the Muslims or Islam. But they are an obstacle to Islamic manifest destiny. To total Islamic control of the area. And this is crucial to understand. That is in really, the only core reason for Islamic attacks on anyone.

When they attack someone for blasphemy, it is absolutely because to blaspheme against Islam is to challenge its supreme authority.

In Guantanamo bay Cuba, Islamic prisoners were found to have hollowed out Korans and hid weapons inside them and other contraband. So clearly there is no prohibition on damaging a Koran if it is in the service of jihad. Only when an infidel ‘desecrates’ a koran is it a casus belli. Because it’s a challenge to Islamic supremacy.

On the second question: Islam and communism have the joint goal of total and utter destruction of the West and all other systems of human organization. Call it legal systems or culture or what you like. But it is about destruction of any system in which people develop or chose to live for themselves that is not sharia law and dictated by Muslims operating from the cannon of Islamic scripture.

Leftist media will not report on things that make Islam look bad. This is in accordance with Islamic law itself. Islam defines “slander” as anything which represents Islam in a bad light, even if true. This is in perfect opposition to Western thought, that believes truth is always the absolute defence. This is recently codified in the declaration of Human Rights in Islam, or the Cairo Declaration, submitted to the UN by the OIC just a few years ago.

But shaping the narrative to allow Islam to appear virtuous, and the virtuous appear to be villains is the current modus by all Western captured media. In Canada, CTV, CBC and Global, and the US the list is very long but if we just stick with the NYT the point is made.

One famous, or should be famous example, was when a Muslim man in Ontario drowned one or more of his wives and one or more of his children by putting them in a car and sending the car into a canal somewhere near Kingston Ontario, along with his sons, and CBC released an edited version of an RCMP tape they had recorded from his tapped phone calls. He had said as part of his rant on why he killed these women that they had “disgraced Islam” or something almost exactly like that. CBC edited that part out.

(Now they wouldn’t have to. The RCMP would likely do the edit before it was released)

They were willing to allow Afghan migrant, Mohammad Shafia to be the bad guy. But erased his Islamic motive from the crime. They wanted it to be about men being evil to women but not that this is codified in Islamic law. (The entire audio file and edited CBC version can be found at Blazing Cat Fur. Unfortunately there is no way to search their site, likely due to attacks on the search tool.)

So when Muslims rape and murder villages of Christians in Africa, it gets little to no publicity, unless in some way it can be used to assist the narrative attacks against the West. When the slave trade is alive and well in islamic nations, even of black people, it gets no attention. Like in Mauritania. The nation was forced to pass a Potemkin law outlawing slavery but it still appears to be in full practice on last look.

The media is always shaping the representation of reality, in order to create an outcome. They may occasionally even tell a truth if it assists in that goal. As Stephen Coughlin and others point out, it is about Telos. Events leading to an outcome. Not an accurate representation of how things are in order to allow individuals to make proper decisions for themselves or their families.

To the point: Both the left and Islam want the total destruction of the nationstate. The left wants a global COMINTERN. Islam wants a global Ummah where the whole world is a mosque and all religion is for allah. The left and Islam shape the narrative to achieve this goal by increments and no small measure of deception. But once it is understood how this is done, it gets easier to spot.

Lastly, while actual antisemitism is truly on the rise and represents an increasing thereat to Jewish people in the most practical ways, from harassment, denial of services or worse, bad service or deceptive and harmful services, to actual physical attacks, antisemitism as a reason for much of what we see is likely the effect of these things above, and not the cause.

Islam, which holds a core tenet of antisemitism as scriptural diktat does not explain it this way to the infidel. They make up a fake history of Israel, or whatever else they need to invent to make their actions against the one non-Islamic state in the region seem justified to the useful idiots of the West. We could embark on similes here, but chances are, anyone who reads this site likely doesn’t need to have a lot of easy comparisons or ‘imagine ifs’ to make the point.

As Stephen Coughlin points out, the attack on Israel on OCt. 7th was likely to cause reprisals, and then to have leftist media spin it in such a way as Israel would appear to be the aggressor. It worked very well. Antisemitism would be the result of this process. Not the cause of it. The cause of it would be the shaping of events and reality to destroy the nation state, (and also on any strong group identity that is not Islamic or communist. Most people are aware of the tremendous amount of now systemic anti-White racism and bias in the system for example.) both on behalf of Islam and communist theory. Blaming certain events on Antisemitism has benefits for the narrative depending on when it is deployed.

When the leftist media is being genuinely antisemitic, by irrationally attacking Israel for example when there are dozens of examples of the actual crime being described truly taking place in the Islamic world, it is never presented as antisemitism, but as legitimate criticism of a Western style government.

When antisemitic attacks take place against Toronto Synagogues, the western media will either not report on it, or fail to mention that there was a synagogue that was attacked or the intended target, or in the case of various Hebrew school busses being burned, fail to mention they were for a Hebrew school and claim it was a vagrant or connected to a grocery store somehow. (All these examples have been detailed at this site.)

But antisemitism still remains a powerful narrative attack and does get used when it advances the revolution. Multiple times, the leftist press has attempted to smear Donald Trump with that label. The only president to make the kitchen at the White House Kosher, is somehow an antisemite.

Antisemitism is a replacement by the media for actual content. Like the word, “Instinct” which usually means, “I dunno it just happens like that”. But with antisemitism it’s often used by the media as a way of casting aspersions on the right and deflecting from their own actions and intentions. This has however, led to genuine antisemitism. Although some if not most of these ‘right wing’ groups which foment hatred of Jews can be attributed somewhat to Alexander Dugin’s efforts.

So yes, you need a secret decoder ring to try and extract reality from any media reporting these days.

Which may explain why you can’t get them in cereal anymore.