1. British school and local governments capitulate to sharia law with unabashed appology to muslims and a promise of an investigation for showing a cartoon.
For context, if a school showed a Nazi era cartoon to show what Nazi cartoons of Jews were, that would be both OK and even necessary on a course which included Nazi propaganda. So this is about only one thing. Enforcing sharia limits on the West. And its working.
BBC article to get up to speed for those unfamiliar with the tempest in a teapot which this issue should be. As I write this though, it occurs to me, the way to take total control of a teapot is to create a tempest in it.
A teacher who showed pupils an “inappropriate” cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad – sparking protests outside a school – has been suspended.
The image depicting the founder of Islam was used in a lesson at Batley Grammar School on Monday.
Videos posted online show dozens of people standing outside the school on Thursday, with some demanding the teacher be sacked.
The government said it was never acceptable to “intimidate” teachers.
Head teacher Gary Kibble apologised “unequivocally”, adding the member of staff had “given their most sincere apologies” and been suspended pending an investigation.
Apology by school head.
Parents have been protesting outside Batley Grammar School this morning after a teacher allegedly showed a caricature of the Prophet Muhammed.
— ITV News Calendar (@itvcalendar) March 25, 2021
A lone voice worried about the consequences of capitulation?
Communities secretary @RobertJenrick has waded into the row over the protests at Batley Grammar School.
Says he's 'deeply troubled' that a teacher may have been 'censored' and left feeling 'threatened or intimidated' pic.twitter.com/ZydJBEkt1f
— ITV News Calendar (@itvcalendar) March 26, 2021
Tweet calling for protest:
Muslims use the classic threat of jihad against the school in the form of group allah ackbarring.
Statement by spokesman of the muslim community, who may or may not be a parent of one of the children. Chances are not, if its anything like the Sam patty event.
The demand for criminal proceedings against the teacher is much in accordance with UN resolution 16/18 which demanded that each nation enact some kind of legislation that would make Islamic blasphemy or criticism of Islam to be a criminal matter.
With religion and blues musicians as a rule, the bigger and more ornate the hat, the more important the leader or performer. Below, a complex hat delivers a lecture on the matter.
Another video of the protest:
Daily Mail story on some of this. Note that the protestors are not the parents. This is a critical aspect. This is the Islamic use of an extension of the Rahm Emanuel slogan. Create a crisis, then maximize its use.
Thousands sign petition started by students calling for suspended teacher ‘who showed Prophet Mohammed cartoons’ to keep his job – after he was whisked away from home on police advice over death threats
A petition started by students of the teacher suspended by Batley Grammar School has been signed by thousands of people today – at a rate of one per second – as it was revealed he was forced to flee his home because of death threats.
The ‘burly Yorkshire lad’ in his 20s, who has not been named, is getting support from police after he allegedly showed cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed as the headteacher today kept 980 children at home after 50 Muslim protesters from outside the area turned up for a second day.
Some of his students have launched a petition trying to save his job, which has been signed by more than 3,000 people by 2pm today, up by 2,000 in the past 12 hours.
People who backed the campaign to save his job have described him as a ‘good man’ and a ‘diligent teacher’ who is ‘respectful of all religions’. Others said the school must stand by him, insisting he was being ‘bullied out’ by ‘radicals’.
One Muslim parent signed the petition, named Mohammed J, wrote: ‘I would like to convey my support for the school and also the teacher concerned. He has taught my daughter and she speaks very highly of him. I would not hesitate to see him teach her again. I am confident that the teacher concerned did not mean any offence and I hope following an investigation he returns to his role at the school.’
Thank you C. for all your hard work assembling these links.
Please read the story and details at RAIR Foundation
Please read the whole story over at RAIR Foundation
The following story was published in French in the Quebec newspaper, La Presse
Translation by Sassy with much thanks. The translator suspects the restaurant in the story is in Montreal.
It was December 7th. Suzanne A. was delighted to introduce her family to this great little restaurant. She’d been there at least ten times. As a family, it was going to be their first time. For Danielle’s birthday party, her little sister, it was perfect.
For lunchtime, they were a party of eight including Suzanne’s siblings and their respective spouses.
Because the restaurant is a “Bring your own wine”, they also brought four bottles of wine.
It was also a “Bring your own cake” that day: When Suzanne made the reservation two weeks earlier, the owner agreed that they would bring their own cake for Danielle’s party.
Suzanne is therefore among the first to arrive. It’s the owner’s wife who welcomes them. She recognizes the owner, who is vacuuming the floor.
The guests arrive little by little. “Please open the bottles”, someone says, at the table…
The owner’s wife, who wears the hijab, opens the bottles. But she warns the group: At half-past noon, I’m going to have to take the bottles and glasses away from you…
Consternation at Suzanne’s table: Take away the wine, but why?
The owner’s wife explains: “There is a very religious Muslim group that made a reservation, they do not want any wine in the restaurant …”
“She was nervous, she felt bad,” Suzanne recalls.
The group rebelled, there was no question of accepting such a diktat. They tried to parley (to no avail), to have the owner explain (“unavailable”, replied his wife) and to offer compromises (putting the bottles on the floor), nothing helped.
“Independent journalist Joakim Lamotte has claimed that women working at Stockholm’s Kista Galleria shopping centre are quitting their jobs due to harassment from foreign men who refuse to be served by women…..The women also allegedly claimed that many of the male customers would refuse to be served by them, demanding to be served by a male coworker instead. ”
Since 2017, Jihad Watch has reported that even Swedish feminists were running away from no-go zones. They have been rather silent about abuse from migrant men; yet only a couple of months before that Jihad Watch report, over a thousand protesters in Stockholm came out to demonstrate against Trump, when they should have been opposing misogynist Muslim men over Sharia-based discrimination against women and infidels — those same men that they were running away from not long after. […]
Video of secret recording of muslim complaining to store and threatening with police because he was served by a woman:
Muslim goes to store. Muslim is served by female clerk. Muslim objects to being served by female, and warns manager he will call the police if they do not find a make to serve him. This is Sweden today.
The only remaining question is, which side would the police be on? And I bet they would have to phone someone to find out.
Outrage is preventing me from the calm required to write a proper article on how this is a good example of the phoney nature of multiculturalism, which is clearly just a tactical term for the utter and total destruction of classical (aka European) Civilization.
Any rational person would say if you choose not to eat a thing, then do not eat it and we will not force you to do so.
But this idea that all of us have to give up our own choices because our choices are offensive to a small, or even large percentage of an invading culture, or even a local one, is anathema.
This is dhimmitude at its most advanced.
Fight damn it.
Thank you Ava Lon, for the translation from Swiss German on the video, and also for doing this accompanying article.
A 14-year-old Syrian hit his female teacher five to six times — he had received negative attention in the past
by Nadja Rohner
The youth from Möriken-Wildegg talked a lot about the Quran, and during recess instructed girls to dress more modestly.
The case caused shock: last week the Argauer Zeitungpublished the news, that in Möriken-Wildegg a student from the Chestenberg school broke the jaw of a teacher by punching her with his fist.
He did this when she wanted to find out if the Syrian secondary-school student was carrying a knife — as he had already done in the past.
This time the case was taken up by the Weltwochejournalist Alex Baur. According to his research it is about a 14-year-old “M”.
He allegedly comes from a Syrian family with numerous children, who came to Switzerland exactly five years previously and allegedly lives on welfare. His German is good, and he is described as “quite intelligent, self-confident and quick-witted.”
Still, for a while “M.” had often allegedly been talking about the Quran. He also requested — “in Allah’s name”— that the girls from the area dress and behave more modestly. In this context he allegedly played with a knife on the Hellmatt School recess court. This, according to Weltwoche, resulted in his having to empty his pockets every time before being allowed to enter the classroom.
Two days in custody
Obviously, during such a search the attack against the teacher took place. She is said not to have touched the student, but instead only told him to show her the contents of his pockets. At that the teen has attacked her, and, according to eyewitnesses, on whose testimonies theWeltwocheauthor bases his story, he hit the 62-year-old female teacher five to six times with a fist and the edge of his hand.
Additionally, while she was fleeing he allegedly kicked her. The mother of two adult sons was about to retire. As Weltwochefound out from her environment, she is still in shock.
The Syrian was arrested shortly after the act. The youth has been released after having to spend two days in custody. The juvenile prosecutor is investigating.
It is not clear what will happen to him. He will not be going back to the Chestenberg district school. According to Weltwoche, one of his friends, also a Syrian, “had been expelled a year earlier from the Chestenberg district school due to discipline problems, and was put in special setting outside of the Chestenberg district school.”
André Schärer, the school district deputy from the Chestenberg school district, has neither confirmed nor contradicted the question from the Aargauer Zeitungabout the research, based on anonymous sources, by Weltwoche. He could only confirm that the Syrian stood out from the beginning. So Schärer also heard that “M.” had allegedly told the girls on the recess court to dress more modestly:
“There are clearly certain signs that he doesn’t agree with the way we are cultivating our culture.”
In the media and in the village there’s a rumor that the wounded teacher had to spend a long time in the hospital. Schärer insists that this is not the case. “The Monday after the incident she was off. On Tuesday the incident was discussed in the class concerned with the school social worker. At that point the teacher was already present [in the school] for a couple of hours. From Wednesday to Friday she took care of the class.” Schärer did not want to be misunderstood, however: “I don’t want to downplay the incident; it is serious and should be most severely condemned.”
School district deputy: “We cannot give any more information.”
It took a week before the incident was made public. The school district deputy insists, however, that nobody wanted to sweep the case under the rug: “It happened on Friday June 28th. One day before the Youth Festival. Already that same evening we, with the [female] president of the school district, decided on a communication strategy; we decided to actively inform male and female students and the parents as much as possible.”
Of course, it was discussed during the Youth Festival, and the district had to listen to complaints that they wanted to hide something. “This isn’t correct. We wrote a letter to the parents during the week following the Youth Festival. Our hands are tied, because of the investigation by the juvenile prosecutor. Even if we wanted to give out more information, we are not allowed to.”
I think this might be an example of what is meant by the term, ‘Dhimmitude’.
Once again, Youtube teaches us all that it is far far more concerned about exposing Islamic hate and ambitions and ideology than it is about spreading that same ideology via its servers. There are still literally thousands, if not tens of thousands, of videos advising and even demanding that muslims hate the unbeliever, and explaining that the only remedy is torture and death and enslavement of us all. These videos never seem to get pulled. But our videos exposing their actions, teachings and ideals increasingly are being pulled with various penalties attached to the banning of our titled version of the videos.