This is a stunning display of Dhimmitude and moral equivalence. Frankly its like the X-files episode we wrote about a few months ago, except its the actual church that is doing it.
“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
This is a stunning display of Dhimmitude and moral equivalence. Frankly its like the X-files episode we wrote about a few months ago, except its the actual church that is doing it.
An Original translation by Nash Montana
Main suspect arrested in deadly attack on 17 year old German boy. The police call him “C” as in “A, B, C” (cause it is three suspects) and confirmed he was born in Italy. Look at the fine print, and the picture that leaked:

“According to chief prosecutor Faßbender, a witness unambiguously identified the 20 year old as the person who beat Niklas. „Also, all components of the description of the [perpetrator’s] person fit.“
Main suspect leans towards violence and denies the deed
Walid S. was born in Italy, Piacenza, but has moroccan roots. He has been living in Bonn for a few years. And: he is already known to the police for violent offenses!
During interrogation, the accused denied being involved in the deed.
Robin Faßbender: „But he got partially caught up in contradictions.“ Among others, he stated where he was during the time of the murder. We were already able to proove that false“, said Faßbender.
note by translator:
What is interesting to note is that after the Antifa riot at the dead teen’s memorial, the press, like F.A.Z. and Spiegel, reported right extremists (!) had hijacked the event and good citizens had protested the right extremists.
No mention of the Antifa excesses.
Yesterday (tuesday) the main suspect was arrested.
At the same time, this whole topic disappeared from the front pages of F.A.Z. and Spiegel, the Germany-wide opinion leaders. Like it never happened.
Wed. May 11 2016. A Jewish deli, already burned down in an act of Arson by “Asians” was burned down again just as it was about to reopen after repairs and renovations.
Ta’am Grill and Bakery in Manchester was due to open just days after the attack – which one of the owners says could have been conducted by “a group of Asian boys”.
Amos Vaisman posted a video on social media showing two men breaking into his shop and dousing it in petrol.
The men then set fire to the building from the bathroom, with the flames spreading rapidly through the various rooms.
[…]
On a post attached to the video he wrote: “We have clear footage of the criminals involved and additional footage of them sending a group of Asian boys to go and buy petrol from the local garage.
(Video of the fire starting at site)
Now lets compare that to related items at the end of the same article:
So when a Muslim structure burns, its “Islamophobic” even though the facts are, a significant amount of the time this happens, it was Muslims who did it, either out of anger, from a competing sect, or to blame the indigenous people of the area in order to get government money to build a larger better newer facility.
When a specific Jewish business is burned not once but twice, its a gang of “Asians”.
Have the people of the Western world bred themselves into a state of suicidal docility?
A few minutes thought will lead us to where this will go, both obvious and less so.
Lets say you are an actuarial. A Jewish person asks for insurance, which is mandatory now of course, to open a deli or any other business that can be identified as Jewish. You check your charts and find that the risk of arson due to ‘crime’ is an order of magnitude higher than for a non-Jewish business. Now the cost of operating is more than one can earn.
Other people who share the same structure also may suddenly not want to allow a Jewish owned or identifiable business to open. They will perceive the risk as coming from the victim, as is the human norm in times of civilizational collapse, as it is recognized that the government cannot and will not act against those who are committing these acts, or as we treat it as a crime and punishment issue and not as a military one, which is what it is, then it doesn’t matter if they do catch the perps because it will make no difference in terms of the risk since there will always be more muslims ready to wage jihad. Again, because it wasn’t a crime per se, in the first place.
The net result will be a net win for the Muslims. They will achieve the first part of the goal, “First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday”. A reference to first, dealing with the Jews and then the Christians.
It is this author’s belief that this cannot change unless we change our view of what is taking place here. Until we understand that war is being waged on us all by Muslims, and that their tactic is to do so in a manner we do not understand, so that we cannot use the proper tools to fight back, we will lose.
There are less than 4 leaders and even potential leaders who appear to understand this, even by inference, in the world today.
The rest of us had better learn to think for ourselves.
One additional thought.
As the “Islamophobic” attack in the link took place in Corsica, it is much more likely that it was a targeted attack against this building because of its purpose. But the history behind it is not what the article indicated whatsoever. It was an illegal mosque operating by very radical jihadis who had really angered the locals many times and many ways. When it became clear that the authorities would not uphold the laws in Corsica, the people did what people should do. They enforced the laws themselves. The crime was the mosque. The response was enforcement. Just not by those who should have done it.
However what I wrote about arson against Islamic buildings in this article holds true for the UK and nearly everywhere else in the West.
Mosques that are attacked in the Islamic world are pretty much all due to Islamic rivalry, Sunni-Shiia conflicts and personal vendettas with the occasional revenge attack by Christians and Buddhists or Hindus where numbers allow and Muslims are heavily on the offensive to take that territory for Islam.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
There has been quite a lot of attention and activity over Merkel’s supplication to Erdogan over some highly typical media criticism, and well deserved at that, of Turkish policies concerning both internal matters and matters that affect the safety, rights and freedoms of Europeans.
Most of the attention is over a fairly annoying and left leaning TV comic named Böhmermann, who wrote a poem mocking Erdogan’s sexuality, and suggesting he would prefer to share a straw bed with a sheep than a mattress with one of his lady friends.
His poem, which was scrubbed from the internet as much as possible, but managed to find its way on to The Rebel’s servers, was even read out loud the other day by a member of the German Parliament.
The Merkel-party MP did not read it as a show of solidarity with European freedom of speech, especially freedom to mock political authority, the sole purpose of that right along with mocking religious authority, but to show why Erdogan is right to be offended and why this comic should be jailed.
Now lets look at this same TV show that Böhmermann works for, doing a treatment of neighboring Poland:
An excerpt from some media on fashionable views of the Polish leadership.
A parade float in the city of Düsseldorf showing the leader of Poland’s ruling party as a dictator has caused shock in Warsaw. The depiction shows “contempt for Poland,” said the country’s foreign minister.
Germany’s famous Carnival Monday parades may be over on Tuesday, but the controversy many of them were courting was not. While several float makers remained under local police investigation for inciting racial hatred, one parade float from the city of Düsseldorf was causing an international outcry.
The creation in question depicts the leader of Poland’s ruling right-wing Law and Justice Party (PiS), Jaroslaw Kaczynski, as a dictator in military uniform with out booted foot on the head of a woman symbolizing his prostrate nation.
Some rather harsh depictions and illustrations of Poland. A nation that, well I think its safe to say, has some negative history with Germany in the not too distant past.
If one has even a quick look over these cases, there is at least the possibility that what we are seeing can be defined in one word.
Dhimmitude.
Thanks for the help Egri Nok.
Please read these two articles by Diana West on Vladimir Bukovski
#2 FLASH: British Court Imposes Gag Order on Bukovsky Libel Proceeding
What kinds of things does he say?
H/T Xanthippa, Diana West, Andrew Bostom.
An original translation by Egri Nok
Regional
Attacks in Cologne
02.05.16
Who is it who does not want “rape” to emerge?
Two police officers report in parliament that they were told to cross out the word “rape” in a first account on the sexual excesses on New Year’s Eve in Cologne. But they stood their ground.
Explosive news around the New Year’s Eve night in Cologne.
The WELT has obtained an email from the Cologne police that describes how an account of sexual attacks was to be downplayed. Source: Die Welt.
Detective chief superintendent Jürgen H. of the Cologne police remembers very well how a phone caller from the superior authority complained about the “IE account” (important event report) on sexual attacks including rape. “Those are not rapes. Delete this word, and cancel the whole IE-report. Best, you write it over completely from the beginning,” is what the caller from the control center of the police of North Rhine-Westphalia allegedly said on January 1 2016.
His tone was “impolite” and “harsh”, and then came the explosive addendum: The deletion is a “request from the Ministry” — referring to the Interior Ministry. Superintendent H remembers that he refused to tolerate the disrespectful tone, and he pointed out to the caller that the case of the 19-year-old, who had fingers inserted into her bodily orifices, was without doubt a “rape”.
It is a key scene, about which the experienced Cologne police officer reports on Monday in front of representatives in parliament. The investigative committee on New Year’s Eve in Cologne tries to elucidate why sexual attacks on a huge scale could take place at the turn of the year 2015/2016 in front of the main train station of the Dome [Cathedral] city, and why the police did not intervene.
Apart from administrative failure, it is also about whether facts were trivialized, and errors downplayed, or even covered up, as the opposition in parliament, CDU and FDP, have come to suspect. The described “cancellation request” from the police control center, with reference to the Ministry, would therefore have to be viewed as a political interference. After all, the contested IE account was the account that first mentioned eleven sexual assaults, including one rape, and a North African group of offenders.
The NRW Interior Ministry has previously publicly denied that such a request for cancellation had occurred and stressed that the control center did not make a phone call to the Cologne police. The Ministry bases its denial on information from the national control center for police services (LZPD), and from the situation room of the State Office of Criminal Investigations (LKA).
But the inconsistency cannot be dispelled that easily, as, in addition to Jürgen H., another witness before the investigation committee reaffirms the attempted interference. Detective Chief Superintendent Joachim H. from the Cologne police reported that he partially overheard his colleague’s phone call on New Year’s morning during shift change, and he too was wondered why someone from the control center of the LZPD would call. This was “absolutely unusual”.
What annoyed him even more was the doubt that it was rape. After all, the victim had been surrounded by 40 to 50 men, and fingers were inserted into her bodily orifices. To fail to acknowledge that this is rape is “from a professional standpoint completely off,” said Joachim H.
He conceded, however, that the organized sexual excesses along with theft and robbery were a “new phenomenon”, a “first case”, unknown to the officers until then. The officer perceived the cancellation request as a “shady threat” from someone from a regional authority, who probably “inflated” himself. The two Cologne detective chief superintendents were not intimidated by the phone call that lasted for about one minute at about 1:30 PM on January 1st, and did not change the wording of the IE account.
But both superintendents don’t know who the caller from the control center LZPD was. The committee is expected to find out who was on duty at that time, and summon that person. The supervisor at that time was deputy CID Director Heidemarie W., and she learned of the explosive call on New Year’s Day. A few days later, she informed the department head for police affairs at the Interior Ministry of NRW, Wolfgang Düren, about the cancellation request, so that he was completely informed. Düren wanted to prepare for the special session in the Interior Committee of Parliament, in which he together with NRW Interior Minister Ralf Jäger (SPD) for the first time commented extensively on New Year’s Eve. But Düren did not mention the cancellation request to the committee then.
However, he said something that now brings additional complications upon himself. In January, Düren stressed that both days after New Year’s Day, January 2 and 3, there was intensive communication about New Year’s Eve, also with deputy CID Director Heidemarie W. of the Cologne police. But the officer now clarifies in front of the investigation committee: “I have to disagree with this.” It was January 4 when she, for the first time, talked to a member of the NRW Interior Ministry.
Please forgive the hubris in this remark. But when people do not understand a set of behaviors, as Christine Hoff Sommers does not, or dismissed clear consistent sets of policies as “Madness” (it is cancer though, as Milo stated) there is a missing piece of the motive for them. In my recent BlogTalk radio appearance I tried to explain the rash of cognitive dissonance amongst those who get it, but just don’t quite get it enough.
An original translation by Egri Nök with much thanks.

Berlin Journal
Bürger schalten Anzeige gegen Merkel in der Schweiz
Michael Müller –
26. April 2016
Citizens place advertisement against Merkel in Switzerland
Page 2 of the Neue Züricher Zeitung of Monday shows a ½ page advertisement with the title “Merkel still cheating on. How long will this continue?” The authors criticise Merkel sharply. The German chancellor is portrayed as a smiling hat player
[translator’s note: This type of play is illegal in Germany].
The advertisement in the Swiss daily cost more than 16,000 Swiss Franks
[16,000 USD/20,000 CAD].
But it is not aimed at a Swiss, but at a German audience. The NZZ is widely read in Germany too. The text of the ad obviously aims at German citizens:
Merkel cheats on!
For how long?
This is how the sham looks:
With the EU-Turkey-Treaty, Chancellor Merkel tries to convince us that she has got the mass immigration into Germany under control. But the facts show: the Turkey-Treaty is a sleight of hand.
1. For every illegal Syrian refugee, who is sent back from EU into Turkey, a recognized Syrian refugee can enter the EU and therefore Germany, as most EU-countries do not accept unlimited quantities of refugees. In other words: the illegal migration is rechristened into a legal migration – the mass immigration into Germany remains constantly high.
2. For this rechristening, EU citizens have to pay 20 million Euros per month!
3. As a “Thank you” for taking them back, Turkey pulled the EU over a barrel and achieved Visa freedom for Turkish citizens at the latest end of this year.
More than 74 million Turks can come to Germany without any Visa at all. The consequences? Bavarian Minister of Finance Söder warns of a Kurdish mass immigration, and the renowned Criminologist Christian Pfeiffer calls this Treaty a “monumental stupidity”, because the freedom of travel could start “a wave of illegal mass immigration”.
4. For this “monumental stupidity” the EU tax payers have to wire 6 billion Euro to Turkey until end 2018, to a country that tramples human rights, freedom of opinion, and freedom of the press under their feet.
Therefore we ask YOU to sign our appeal against the “Merkelian Welcome Culture” at www.rechtundfreiheit.de
[end of ad]
It is the Association for the Preservation of Law and Civil Liberty behind the advertisement. Why did this German group place their advertisement in a Swiss newspaper?
The media businessman Josef Konrad answers an enquiry by Blick:
“Except for the Hannoversche Zeitung, all large newspapers in Germany refused to print this ad.” The NZZ-ad has fully been funded by donations of the supporters. But they do not plan further ads in Swiss media.
About 3,500 people have already signed the ‘No’ to the “Merkelian Welcome Culture”. Now they hope to find more signatures through the NZZ advertisement “Merkel cheats on!”.
The name of those behind the association still remain a mystery. Media businessman Josef Konrad says, his cooperation with the association was only temporary, and he has no connections to the association.
“The founders and members of the association currently do not wish to appear in public or to be named”, says Josef Konrad, who is a member of the AfD Bavaria. It is a “loose association of concerned citizens from Germany”.
Thank you Oz-Rita for the hard work on this important translation.
The definition of bullying might be a state broadcaster that uses over a billion dollars in revenue they take from the public by force and then use it to push their own ideas on that same public, even though the mandate is to inform and connect the public.
In this ambush of French presidential candidate Marine le Pen, the interviewer managed to turn it around well enough that the station sort of hid it on their website rather than advertise it. Its worth the watch. Its nearly a template as to how people who are not cultural Marxists, AKA “Far right wing extremists” have to handle pretty much any legacy media contact they may have.
ACT For Canada had James Bissett speak on March 31st in Ottawa about Canada’s immigration and refugee history and current systems and the total lack of debate on such a critical issue for Canada’s future.
Mr. Bissett is an extremely experienced diplomat and was also a consultant to former prime ministers on national security.
More here at The Rebel
Thank you Oz-Rita for the rapid translation of this interesting video.
Below, a muslim who was arrested on the 26th of March 2016 as the third man in the photo of the three attackers of the Brussels airport.
It seems he was a ‘freelance journalist’ before his career peak as a jihadi.
Below is an example of his reportage