Category Archives: CBC

Rebel Report on CBC active measures Aktivnye meropriyatiya

Posted on by

The following editorial on the video below was written by Johnny U and posted unedited:

Here is a piece by Rebel News that does not quite grasp its own profundity. It reveals Rebel and the people it is trying to help are missing a few vital keys to fully grasping what is going on: namely an active measure.

One definition:

The term, which dates back to the 1920s, includes operations such as espionage, propaganda, sabotage, assassination, and the collection of kompromat for blackmail purposes based on the foreign policy objectives of the Soviet and Russian governments.

Usually we only see the end results of an active measure. This means we see the headline shaming the political target, but not the setup that created the shame. Another example was the placement of Nazi flags by state actors among the Truckers Freedom Convoy, which was intended to disgrace that whole movement in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This Rebel report gives us a rare glimpse into the actual machinery of an active measure. The language of dialectics, of which active measures is a vital component, is difficult and abstract and hard to learn. It becomes, however, an increasingly blunt instrument the more one learns it. Metaphorically, describing in detail a loaded hand gun to a blind person is an abstraction until the gun is fired and the bullet hits them, whereupon the “Aha!” moment instantly erases all abstraction, along with the implied cleverness of the words used to describe the gun.

The full comment can be read here. 

2015: BBC manipulation to scrub the Islam out of one of the most horrifying mob murders we were allowed to know about

Posted on by

First, please watch this BBC report on the murder of an allegedly devoted Muslim woman in Kabul who was murdered in a way worse than anything you have seen on Chimp Wars.

One of the focus points of this site has been the stunning transformation of Western media outlets into agents of enemy propaganda. But that nomenclature falls so short of the mark it’s a lie of understatement.

Using carefully crafted dialectical narrative attacks, the media does more than any kind of Tokyo Rose blunt force, and even comical level propaganda; it does manipulation of reality on a grand scale, such that its users now put themselves in harms way to support those narratives. Narratives that without that propaganda would be so obviously false, that in a now, barely vestigial rational world, no one would let someone get the end of the sentence when they tried to tell you that a man could declare himself a woman and therefore really was one and had to be treated as such. That an untested brand new injectable gene therapy was a “safe and effective vaccine”. So safe that everyone had to take it or lose their career. Or that ICE law enforcement that are trying to arrest illegal migrants, raping, killing and otherwise tearing down the fabric of society should be run over with your car.

That Western emitted CO2 during the process of doing anything productive would cause an existential climate crisis to the entire planet, as demonstrated by the occasional rise and fall of volcanic islands in the ocean. Yes, somehow the Ocean has learned to rise only in one small spot in the South Pacific.

These are ideas that would be patently unbelievable even in a dystopian future movie if it was made in the 1960s or before. Maybe even much later.

Understanding the machinery of this media manipulation is key. And this site repeatedly tries to expose these tactics. I’ll put a couple of videos below of 2 short speeches given in front of the CBC building back during the post Freedom Convoy, but still remnants of the Covid measures era.

In the case of the BBC video at the top of the post, we ask you all to watch the video very carefully. Take notes of how they frame this murder, the victim, and the killers. Also how the Afghan women allegedly reacted to the killing. Also note please what is not said. What motives were not even mentioned in the BBC report, and remember, it was from 2015. Then click through to RAIR Foundation and read this article on the event.

On the tactics and responsibility of the CBC for their crimes against Canadians:

Ari:

John:

It would be great to see comments where people identify propaganda points about the BBC story in the comments.

Remember, deception of omission is as powerful or more so, than deception by insertion or fabrication. Framing is also important.

I really hope an actual discussion gets going in the comments. To understand this media weaponry as throughly as possible is a solid key to thinking your way out of the Panopticon that has been constructed for the people of the West now.

Controlled op, the CBC and the deracination of the Commonwealth: Links 1 for Sept. 1st, 2025

Posted on by

1. Another excellent example, Taylor made really, of how controlled opposition works.

The dialectical or communist state wants the total destruction of freedom of speech. To get that, they have to make you thi8nk it’s in your interests to have speech illegal. As many kinds as possible. Ideally under a rubric the state can arbitrarily define as needs be.

Hate speech is perfect. It’s like Islamic blasphemy laws, except more adjustable to whatever it is the state doesn’t want you to say or think that day, and subject to change without notice.
Next to hate speech laws, Islamic blasphemy laws are mercifully consistent and transparent.

Pierre Poilievre takes advantage of the stabbing of a Jewish woman by a rabid anti-Israel, anti-semite at a Loblaws with a small kosher section on Wednesday to make an appeal for more and stronger “hate-speech” laws. Many people, and nearly all Jewish people will support this. Which is stunning given that Canada already has totalitarian hate speech laws, which have not been enforced against the left and Muslims demanding harm come to Israel and the Jewish people, but has been applied to whoever the state decides is a “vulnerable group” that day. Itself a term of control that lets the state continue to maneuver us all along whatever path is most destructive to Western culture, people and history.

Full text:
Pierre Poilievre
@PierrePoilievre
I am outraged by yet another vile antisemitic attack, this time at a grocery store in Ottawa. Targeting people because they are Jewish is disgusting, un-Canadian, and must be met with the full force of the law. Jewish Canadians should never have to fear walking into their place of worship, sending their kids to school, or getting groceries. I call on the Prime Minister to ensure there are serious consequences for those who commit or incite antisemitic crimes — including stronger hate-crime laws, and the deportation of non-Canadians who come here to spread hatred. We must eradicate the growing scourge of antisemitism in Canada. Never again means never again.

The answer to the problem is more freedom of speech. Not less. And the deporting of people who do not obey our laws, or hold our value.

Whether is rubric of “hate-crimes laws” includes hate speech or not, the same applies. A crime is a crime. Assault, attempted murder etc. is what it is. It is or should be up to the judge to factor motive into the sentencing. If it is a crime of hatred of a stranger because the attacker associates his victim with a group he hates, there can be extra sentencing layered on top or not. But trying to stab someone is a very serious crime. That should be enough. We must be equals before the law. That is a corner stone of the West overall. The moment you have favoured groups as either victims or perps, which is clearly happening in Canada and across the West (perhaps with special emphasis on the UK) civilization is going over a cliff. And that is clearly the intention here.

2. Terrifying new details of Canada’s advancing assisted suicide laws… including push to euthanize newborn BABIES

A huge part of the very Judeo-Christian component of Western culture is the idea of the sacredness of life. Unless;ike Islam, Jewish law for example, allows the eating of pork and a lot of other rules to be broken if it means saving ones own, or the life of another. Christianity kept this tradition in spirit and letter of the law. Murder is still the worst thing you can do, or at least culturally if that is no longer the case in law perhaps.

It has been our suspicion that part of the reason the communists made abortion a sacrament, is that it is a direct intersectional or dialectical attack on the sanctity of life overall. The state wants total power over life and death and cannot tolerate a religion that puts god and life above the state. This also explains the seeming contradiction between my-body-my-choice with abortion, and you have to take a potentially lethal injection to save your grandma with zero evidence to show why. In both cases it is the body belonging to the state, even if abortion is a partial measure. Canada’s slippery slope with assisted suicide is a lot closer to the end game. The parameters are widening quickly in terms of who qualifies to have the state murder them.

Granted, I am using the term murder incorrectly, since after all, whether we know it or not, we usually use the word “murder” to mean killing without the right permission. Meaning of course, permission by the state. If its the death penalty or killing someone in war or self defence, well once upon a time anyway, that was not murder.

Even biblically that remains true, as the commandment actually reads, “Though shalt not murder”. But the bible creates rational conditions for killing another, like self defence. So we can see why the state wants to be rid of Judaism and Christianity. Only the state should have that power, and when it does, everyone not aligned with state doctrine is a candidate. And the statistics on who seems to be the recipient of state driven death should tell you exactly who is, and is not aligned.

From the Daily Mail:

Canada‘s assisted suicide laws have continued rapidly expanding in recent years, with a group of doctors now pushing for disabled newborn babies to be euthanized.

The demand for euthanasia is so high that doctors who provide it cannot keep up, according to a new report by The Atlantic.

Assisted dying, legalized in 2016, now accounts for about one out of 20 deaths in Canada, far surpassing countries where it’s been legal for longer. 

As assisted deaths have become a major part of Canada’s health care system, the Quebec College of Physicians suggested legalizing euthanasia for infants born severely ill.

As The Atlantic noted, the practice is legal in the Netherlands – the first country to adopt it since Nazi Germany did it in 1939. 

In 2022, Louis Roy from the Quebec College of Physicians raised the notion of euthanasia for babies up to a year old ‘who are born with severe deformations, very grave and severe medical syndromes, whose life expectancy and level of suffering are such that it would make sense to ensure that they do not suffer.’

While parents already have the option of stopping treatment for babies suffering from medical conditions, the proposal would accelerate the infant’s death, sparking questions about consent. 

However you may feel about the issue as framed by the DM, the slippery slope argument remains valid.

3. Many times over the past few years, we have explored one of CBC’s main informational weapon tactics. That is the one of appearing to speak truth to power, in order to make the power more powerful. For example during Covid, they would never present a truly opposite PoV to the narrative, even Pfizer’s own documents showing that the Vaxx did not prevent covid and that a side effect of it was in fact Covid. Instead, they would have angry people on and ‘experts’ who would demand that the state did more to crush our rights. Someone someone Kaplan in Ottawa is one excellent example. An MD that wore a mask even on Zoom calls when alone. She ended up on school boards agitating for the most harsh measures possible and operated ferociously against ideological opponents.

She was far from the only one, but it is the only name I can summon at the moment.

Below, Honest reporting notices the same tactic. A tiny protest outside CBC accuses CBC itself for being insufficiently critical of Israel.

THIS protest they give lots of coverage to.

CBC News recently reported on a small protest outside its Winnipeg offices, claiming dissatisfaction with the broadcaster’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict. The August 16th article entitled: “Rally outside Winnipeg CBC building protests broadcaster’s Gaza coverage,” portrayed the CBC as being under fire for not being sufficiently critical of Israel — for allegedly failing to amplify Palestinian voices or adopt activist rhetoric like “genocide.” The suggestion is, of course, outrageous. The CBC’s record is not one of downplaying Palestinian perspectives but of grotesquely skewed, one-sided reporting against Israel. To frame the broadcaster as guilty of under-representing anti-Israel narratives ignores reality, flips the truth on its head, and seriously misinforms Canadians.

The report which was produced by Erin Brohman, a journalist for CBC Manitoba, emphasized the protesters’ calls for an independent review of the network’s Gaza coverage and cited claims from the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba about “censoring, obfuscating and neglecting the truth.” It spotlighted emotional appeals from teenaged students and other activists, asserting that Israel is engaged in “genocide” against Palestinians. The article also referenced 192 journalists killed since the war began, including Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, along with the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry’s (false) claims of malnutrition-related deaths – all without providing critical context.

Click through to read the whole article. It is good, as one would expect from Honest Reporting. But the tight focus of that organization causes it to undersell its own case as well as fail to see the bigger picture. Which makes it actually harder for people to understand the real play.

There are something like 150 wars in the world today.

A substantial fraction of them are Muslims on one or both sides.

Many of those wars are truly genocidal wars by Muslims against non Muslims because they are non Muslims. I mean truly genocidal where the entire population of a Christian village in Africa are exterminated by jihadis, and the women kidnapped as sex slaves. Sex slaves, even though Muslims might call them ‘wives’. A cynical rhetorical trick that many buy into, like referring to the founder of Islam as “The Prophet Mohammad”.

CBC would not cover any of those, except for the briefest of moments. Perhaps when Michelle Obama focussed on the kidnapping of many African women as sex slaves, the CBC would parrot her voice. But at no time did they explain how Islam makes that legal, and a core doctrine and incentive of its ‘faith’.

Below, a couple of protests against CBC itself a couple of years ago at its main offices in Ottawa Canada on Sparks st.

Here is a fairly large one from Nov. 2021

IF CBC covered it, they would have framed it quite differently.

And this was a tiny one in Jan. of 2023

A couple of videos from that protest: that make the point well.

These are protests of CBC and its methods. The one Honest Reporting pointed out are likely funded by them, or funded by the same agencies that fund CBC.

Here is CBC on protests against state narratives on immigration in Australia:

Some first rate deflection and deception in the latter part of that video.

The low hanging fruit here is if it is NOT TRUE that Australia is swamped by ‘immigration’ then why is the government working hard to reduce the numbers? The clay pot fallacy.

But the rest of it, while subtle, is no less enemy propaganda.

One wonders what the percentage is for people at CBC to destroy their own culture, history and people.

4. STD vaccines are being given to NEW BORNS

5. CANADIANS Pay attention to this one. Remember, The Commonwealth is coming down in the same way across the board.

Australia contemplates a tax on spare bedrooms. You know, the country that insists there is not a mass immigration wave.

 

WE DO NOT AGREE with the analysis of the video above on the Commonwealth. This was created by international communists. NOT the pattern this video claims. But the destruction of the Commonwealth is correct.

Thank you all for checking out this site and its views.

For an excellent illustration of the dialectic nature of Canada today and CBC’s role as narrative enforcement we beseech you to read this thread

Posted on by

Please go to X and read this thread:

https://x.com/CandiceMalcolm/status/1953580011694493721

it is very important and illustrative. It must be added to our archives on the nature of the CBC today.

The woman who the dialectical engineer at the CBC interviewed an author of a factual counter-narrative book on the Residential Schools for a hit piece, But the author had the wherewithal to record the interview herself and publish the whole interview, after an edited and deceitful version was foisted on the public by the CBC.

After you read the thread, come back and watch this:

UPDATE: I had to add this video from the thread:

Posted in CBC

Rebel Media report on CBC, good, but an order of magnitude shy of the real evil of the State Broadcaster

Posted on by

This Rebel media report on CBC comes SO close but understates the problem dramatically.

Given the events of the last 10 years, and very calculated and deliberate disinformation by CBC, such as reporting hospitals as being full to overflowing with triage being done in the parking lots because emergency was full etc. etc. when the reality was that the hospitals, in general and foolishly, specific ones CBC mentioned, where actually nearly empty. and that whole wards were closed down, the parking lots were empty except for a few ambulances and police cars…

and given the evidence against CBC claims, we, for example went there ourselves. We filmed all the Ottawa hospitals while CBC broadcast this defacto disinformation. (Not the way CBC and the politicians use the word, but as what it actually means, the knowing dissemination of false information to damage a target) We also have video taken by others across Canada, perhaps most famously at a New Brunswick hospital CBC claimed was overflowing. A person watching the report who lived next to it, jogged over and filmed an empty emergency ward and empty parking lot. And of course, video taken by CBC of a clothing mannequin with an O2 mask on in an ICU which they presented as an actual live person with serious Covid19…

Then we know that the CBC was in fact part of a line of operation in collusion with the state and probably pharmaceutical companies to deceive Canada into the permanent loss of fundamental rights, among other major changes in the way all our systems operate.

I say permanent, because should the state wish to obliterate your basic freedoms in some new way, or the same way again, they simply will. The Carney government has carte blanche now to eliminate any semblance of a people-operated self governance system. We already see that in all kinds of legislation being passed, perfectly consistent with Trudeau’s various fully Hegelian by nature bills.

We did not get any rights back after the illegal and unconstitutional Covid measures were applied. The EM act was found to be unconstitutional by a Federal court, but it made zero difference to anyone charged under it. And no one was punished or even charged for abusing it to destroy basic rights.

In last night’s post we see how the charge against Helen Grus begins to show clarity as a crime against a Hegelian state’s diktats as opposed to any actual malfeasance in the carrying out of her duties.

These changes to our liberties are permanent, even though there may not be a state of lockdown or forced medications at the moment. But our right to object to current and future impediments to our freedoms is gone. Rule of law for the most part is gone and replaced with a system that operate to create political outcomes.

The concept of truth being the absolute defence is not just gone, but the use of truth altogether is gone. Our system no longer considers what is true to be a factor in determining outcomes. This applies both in medicine, (obviously) and in law, and in hearings and any procedure or event which has political consequences. Especially where the outcome has any effect on the power of the state. The state, will determine what is real. Anyone who attempts to inject a Socratic/Aristotelian set of proofs which threatens the power of a state narrative will be punished. So far with things like debanking or hearings in professional associations like the professional colleges.

From John Carpay, the head of one of the very few genuine human rights law firms left in Canada:

CBC was notorious for broadcasting narrative attacks in the 1970s claiming that Western industry post WW2 was going to block out the sun and cause an ice age in a way that would mimic the effects of a global nuclear war. So they called the effect, to make it extra scary, “Nuclear Winter”. What really is scary is how hard it is to find any of the hundreds of hours of footage they broadcast with David Suzuki, the Fruit Fly geneticist, explaining how our industriousness would bring an end to the world from it.

The footage of him saying global warming will end the world is still out there Im sure. But years of his Nuclear Winter agitprop, gone, Memory holed, as Orwell called it in 1984.

CBC, CTV and Global are clearly engaged in a coordinated information warfare effort in collusion with, what we will call, the COMINTERN, What Stephen Coughlin now calls The Powers that Be, as it is somewhat nebulous, and most would call the government, against the people of Canada.

Of course we saw MUCH better examples during elections and Covid and the vaxx push by all captured media. TwitterX was awash with compilations of coordinated messaging appearing like news but was really agitprop for various state narratives.

CBC doesn’t just lie to an agenda. it is part of a full blown weapon to destroy classical Canada, its people, its culture and history. The narrative attack of the mass graves of Amer-Indian children, which the Rebel mentions, is just one excellent example of CBC destruction of Canadian history.

Multiculturalism for another. And always pushing Islam as if it was not the massively destructive force on the world it has been since the day Mohammad raided and robbed his first Caravan.

The CBC is part of a larger destructive agenda. It is not just sloppy, or incompetent. There is not a trace of Hanlon’s Razor in its overall agenda, even if there is in the occasional detail.

As they said of Merkel, CBC muss weg

Or perhaps more appropriately, CBC delenda est.

Don’t defund it. Force it to make an honest documentary about itself and its dialectic attacks over the last 50 years, then arrest and try its principles and a lot of its propagandist in a real court with a judge that believes in the rule of law.

Then sell off the equipment at market value to any private orgs. that feel its useful for a proper information service,

Two examples of Canadian state broadcasts, pre and post revolution, and letting the air out of a jeans advertisement

Posted on by

This CTV report is fascinating in one aspect only.

In this gossip level report about celebrity hedonist front man for Mark Carney from 2015 to 2024, CTV insinuates that the former marionette is involved with pop singer, Katy Perry, whom they refer to as, “former Astronaut”.

Now either CTV is being tongue in cheek and thereby diminishing them both, after all she is an astronaut in pretty much the way he was prime minister, or, as a much funnier man than I once said, “If Katy Perry is an astronaut, then I’m a gynaecologist”, or this is some astonishingly surreal propaganda.
If it’s the former, kudos to CTV for a change. Maybe it’s just a tiny bit of samisdat working its way out of the fully captured station.

This next one will be a great bit of nostalgia for many Canadians.

It was a broadcast from a documentary made in 2006 by CBC. It is actually informative and for the most part, true, and contains valuable information. Some of which is the reveal that Osama Bin Laden in fact obtained a fatwa from an unnamed Saudi cleric that:

  • In early 2003, bin?Laden secured a fatwa from a radical Saudi cleric that declared—if all other means failed—a nuclear strike against U.S. civilians would be permissible, even obligatory, under Islamic law.

  • The fatwa stated that a weapon capable of killing millions and devastating their lands would be justified if like-scale harm had been inflicted on Muslim lands.

This is a really interesting and informative documentary.

Then compare it to anything from CBC for the past 10 years or more.

Lastly, the gossip level rage bait that has all the talking heads giving both sides of the dialectic is the good jeans/genes BS.

I think it was a few years ago here on the site when we published some ad campaigns that various companies made as a kind of showcase of what they can do, but never actually launched as adds for the products.

These companies know that controversy will sell product, at least to one side, but more importantly, will have everyone watching the add and that is their objective.

They made these adds to get attention. In other words, the same reason all advertising companies make adds.

The odd time it is genuinely political. Like with Bud Lite. And that was a disaster.

The American Eagle Denim products will likely pay for more than the cost of the campaign, + COGS and has a lot of people wasting their time talking about it like it is a real issue.

Anyone who didn’t know who Sweeney was, likely does now.

Here is the 15 second bit tucked into a rant. I think the only substantial aspect of this, is how advertising companies score and how we can use that to tell the future.

Hopefully nothing of real consequence comes of it. This isn’t news, neither is it reality. It’s a good looking girl selling jeans for a company.

There is a point of interest though. If you bother to scroll through social media and find the objections to these adds, they may offer a revealing central aspect of leftist thought.

And that would be the concept of the Blank Slate.

In Steven Pinker’s excellent book, The Blank Slate, he attributes most leftist, science-negating reasoning today to three key concepts.

The Ghost in the machine.

The Noble Savage

And The Blank slate.

In the third idea, the concept must be held that all people, and even all animals must be considered to be equal in potential. And that any perceived advantage a person may have is privilege and must be eliminated. It is in one aspect, part of the process of moving from equality to equity.

The idea that there is an objective beauty. and there really is, remains anathema to the left. This explains a lot about why women who are far to the left make themselves unattractive, and much of the ideas beyond postmodern art. Find a video of Yoko Ono singing if you feel you need to know what that means.

So if something is to be drawn from the Sweeney Jeans/genes fake controversy, it could be that the advertising company knew exactly how segments of the left would react and decided to see if they could do a reverse Bud Lite play. And why they would react that way, would the offence this add represents to the concept of the Blank Slate.

Student film on the Druze eclipses NYT, Western media for accuracy (with added commentary)

Posted on by

A reader to this site submitted this video to the Reader’s Links on the Druze people, their religion and origins and alliances in the Middle East.

It is of course, impossible to discuss religion without politics when one side of a conflict Is Islam. Because Islam is politics with a religious justification and nearly nothing else. Quoting one Christian 14th century Emperor, who was also quoted by a Catholic Pope that mysteriously retired out of office, giving way to the communist, Pope Francis, “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

First, the video on the Druze. Then a few thoughts of my own.

Accurate? Yes at least compared to all reporting we have seen on the issue. It eclipses the NYT for instance, and infinitely so for all the influential media that doesn’t report on it at all.

(As an aside, at this late stage of the revolution, influential media has come to mean something different. It is more a question of the state media pumping out a narrative attack, and the government using that narrative attack to implement policy, rather than so many people listen to it that they make decisions based on the information they get from it. CBC in Canada has dropped to a staggeringly low amount of viewers, but it’s still influential in the sense that it is prophetic. What they say, heralds a restrictive new policy that no one would ever vote for if it was presented honestly)

The video in our estimate leaves a few questions though.

1. What are the motives for the Islamic attacks on the Druze?

2. Why is there so little publicity on real attempted genocides by Muslims against all other peoples?

3. Why is the media siding with Islamic narratives when it comes to Israel, even when all parties know it is factually inaccurate? And no, it is not actually antisemitism, (although the resurgence of it is definitely a creation of the captured media working with Islam.)

First, a basic understanding of Islam is required. Islam has a lot of rules, laws and directives for its believers. But if one were to put them all in a blender, reduce them for a few hours and pour out the essence, it would read that Muslims must do everything they can do to increase the influence of Islam, both in area of influence and extent.

Maliki, the founder of one of the main schools of Islamic jurisprudence, made it clear that all Muslims should wage jihad against the unbeliever at least once a year. And to be extra-exceptionally clear, Jihad always, always meant actual violent warfare against the infidel to make Islam the only system of human organization possible on Earth. The idea of it being a kind of inner struggle for self betterment is a 20th century invention by a historical revisionist as part of the overall leftist and Islamic plot to allow Islam to be a destructive force against the West by deception. All Islamic and even non Islamic references to jihad prior to that are about warfare against the non-Muslim. (*Source: The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise)

One of these directives is that any land ever held by Muslims is in perpetuity, Islamic lands. That they have a legal right to rule it as per sharia. Spain for instance, is considered an Islamic land by Sharia, and Osama Bin Laden made a video that circulated not too long after 911 making it clear that Spain would be retaken by islam as per their legal right. That video has vanished. But I would go to court and swear on having seen it, and even having it on a hard drive of my own once upon a time.

So the attacks on the Druze, the Jewish people in Israel, and other groups in what they call, “Dar al Islam” or the world of Islam is motivated by the ferocious drive for Islamic Manifest Destiny. The excuses they give are to sell it to the West.  The Justification for Islamic atrocities because *-Insert-victim narrative here.*

The Druze are also the single most loyal group to Israel there is. More by far than left wing Jewish people are in the West. So the forces of Islam have a lot of reasons to try and exterminate the Druze people. None of them are because they are a threat to the Muslims or Islam. But they are an obstacle to Islamic manifest destiny. To total Islamic control of the area. And this is crucial to understand. That is in really, the only core reason for Islamic attacks on anyone.

When they attack someone for blasphemy, it is absolutely because to blaspheme against Islam is to challenge its supreme authority.

In Guantanamo bay Cuba, Islamic prisoners were found to have hollowed out Korans and hid weapons inside them and other contraband. So clearly there is no prohibition on damaging a Koran if it is in the service of jihad. Only when an infidel ‘desecrates’ a koran is it a casus belli. Because it’s a challenge to Islamic supremacy.

On the second question: Islam and communism have the joint goal of total and utter destruction of the West and all other systems of human organization. Call it legal systems or culture or what you like. But it is about destruction of any system in which people develop or chose to live for themselves that is not sharia law and dictated by Muslims operating from the cannon of Islamic scripture.

Leftist media will not report on things that make Islam look bad. This is in accordance with Islamic law itself. Islam defines “slander” as anything which represents Islam in a bad light, even if true. This is in perfect opposition to Western thought, that believes truth is always the absolute defence. This is recently codified in the declaration of Human Rights in Islam, or the Cairo Declaration, submitted to the UN by the OIC just a few years ago.

But shaping the narrative to allow Islam to appear virtuous, and the virtuous appear to be villains is the current modus by all Western captured media. In Canada, CTV, CBC and Global, and the US the list is very long but if we just stick with the NYT the point is made.

One famous, or should be famous example, was when a Muslim man in Ontario drowned one or more of his wives and one or more of his children by putting them in a car and sending the car into a canal somewhere near Kingston Ontario, along with his sons, and CBC released an edited version of an RCMP tape they had recorded from his tapped phone calls. He had said as part of his rant on why he killed these women that they had “disgraced Islam” or something almost exactly like that. CBC edited that part out.

(Now they wouldn’t have to. The RCMP would likely do the edit before it was released)

They were willing to allow Afghan migrant, Mohammad Shafia to be the bad guy. But erased his Islamic motive from the crime. They wanted it to be about men being evil to women but not that this is codified in Islamic law. (The entire audio file and edited CBC version can be found at Blazing Cat Fur. Unfortunately there is no way to search their site, likely due to attacks on the search tool.)

So when Muslims rape and murder villages of Christians in Africa, it gets little to no publicity, unless in some way it can be used to assist the narrative attacks against the West. When the slave trade is alive and well in islamic nations, even of black people, it gets no attention. Like in Mauritania. The nation was forced to pass a Potemkin law outlawing slavery but it still appears to be in full practice on last look.

The media is always shaping the representation of reality, in order to create an outcome. They may occasionally even tell a truth if it assists in that goal. As Stephen Coughlin and others point out, it is about Telos. Events leading to an outcome. Not an accurate representation of how things are in order to allow individuals to make proper decisions for themselves or their families.

To the point: Both the left and Islam want the total destruction of the nationstate. The left wants a global COMINTERN. Islam wants a global Ummah where the whole world is a mosque and all religion is for allah. The left and Islam shape the narrative to achieve this goal by increments and no small measure of deception. But once it is understood how this is done, it gets easier to spot.

Lastly, while actual antisemitism is truly on the rise and represents an increasing thereat to Jewish people in the most practical ways, from harassment, denial of services or worse, bad service or deceptive and harmful services, to actual physical attacks, antisemitism as a reason for much of what we see is likely the effect of these things above, and not the cause.

Islam, which holds a core tenet of antisemitism as scriptural diktat does not explain it this way to the infidel. They make up a fake history of Israel, or whatever else they need to invent to make their actions against the one non-Islamic state in the region seem justified to the useful idiots of the West. We could embark on similes here, but chances are, anyone who reads this site likely doesn’t need to have a lot of easy comparisons or ‘imagine ifs’ to make the point.

As Stephen Coughlin points out, the attack on Israel on OCt. 7th was likely to cause reprisals, and then to have leftist media spin it in such a way as Israel would appear to be the aggressor. It worked very well. Antisemitism would be the result of this process. Not the cause of it. The cause of it would be the shaping of events and reality to destroy the nation state, (and also on any strong group identity that is not Islamic or communist. Most people are aware of the tremendous amount of now systemic anti-White racism and bias in the system for example.) both on behalf of Islam and communist theory. Blaming certain events on Antisemitism has benefits for the narrative depending on when it is deployed.

When the leftist media is being genuinely antisemitic, by irrationally attacking Israel for example when there are dozens of examples of the actual crime being described truly taking place in the Islamic world, it is never presented as antisemitism, but as legitimate criticism of a Western style government.

When antisemitic attacks take place against Toronto Synagogues, the western media will either not report on it, or fail to mention that there was a synagogue that was attacked or the intended target, or in the case of various Hebrew school busses being burned, fail to mention they were for a Hebrew school and claim it was a vagrant or connected to a grocery store somehow. (All these examples have been detailed at this site.)

But antisemitism still remains a powerful narrative attack and does get used when it advances the revolution. Multiple times, the leftist press has attempted to smear Donald Trump with that label. The only president to make the kitchen at the White House Kosher, is somehow an antisemite.

Antisemitism is a replacement by the media for actual content. Like the word, “Instinct” which usually means, “I dunno it just happens like that”. But with antisemitism it’s often used by the media as a way of casting aspersions on the right and deflecting from their own actions and intentions. This has however, led to genuine antisemitism. Although some if not most of these ‘right wing’ groups which foment hatred of Jews can be attributed somewhat to Alexander Dugin’s efforts.

So yes, you need a secret decoder ring to try and extract reality from any media reporting these days.

Which may explain why you can’t get them in cereal anymore.

CBC is enemy propaganda

Posted on by

This has to be one of the most refreshing, not to mention well presented briefs on how CBC is positioned in terms of its place in the new communist state of Canada.

If we swap out “Living amongst a bunch of crazies in an open air asylum” which she says right after, “And then you question your own sanity” with: “And then you question your own sanity because you are clearly living in an imposed pseudo-reality which so many around you buy into like audience volunteers in a hypnosis act” then she basically delivers a 90 minute briefing that I would do in around 48 seconds.

Let’s see what else is floating around about the CBC today:

Leaked Audio: CBC Executive Questions Former Host Dhanraj Over Critical Post on Broadcaster’s President Declining Interview

A leaked audio recording captures a CBC executive confronting former host Travis Dhanraj over a post criticizing the network president’s rejection of an interview on funding and priorities.

The recording, published by the National Post, comes as Dhanraj announced his decision to resign from the network on July 7, alleging editorial bias in the network. His lawyer later said CBC hasn’t accepted his resignation at this point. CBC says that there has been no wrongdoing on its part, and that Dhanraj is still a unionized employee. 
The office of Dhanraj’s lawyer Kathryn Marshall confirmed to The Epoch Times that the leaked audio recording of the April 2024 meeting is authentic.  […]
According to Marshall’s office, Dhanraj was “strongly discouraged from booking conservative voices” in his capacity as Canada Tonight’s host and was retaliated against after his April post asking Tait onto his show. In his July 7 post on X, Dhanraj said he had “no choice” but to quit CBC because it avoided “hard truths” and allowed important voices to be “sidelined.”
There are a couple of things I don’t get about the article though, if you read it in full.
How can the CBC not accept his resignation? I mean he quits he quits, right? They can keep paying him and pretend he still works there in a kind of reverse, George Costanza way, but if someone quits, they quit and there isn’t much you can do about it unless they are your actual slave. Secondly, I get that he said he can’t ethically or in principle keep working for the CBC. But how does anyone ethically or in a principled way, start working for them in the first place? Short of janitorial staff I mean.
Of course it can’t impose anymore than Big Brother’s 2 minutes of hate show, or the daily mandatory exercise show could implode. It is a wing of an informational militarized state. Its purpose is the constant churn of previous narratives and recycling them into new narratives. Like having David Suzuki on TV many times a week warning of “Nuclear Winter” from Western industrial output, to Global Warming, also from Western industrial output. And while that is one of our favorite examples, mostly by how well the COMINTERN in Canada has memory holed all the Nuclear Winter bollux, it is far from the only one. At least some of us can still remember some of the vaxx narratives, the overflowing hospital narratives and mannequins in ICUs etc.

Mark Carney to INCREASE funding for enemy propaganda outlet, CBC and make the funding mandatory

Posted on by

The first sentence in this video is correct. Devil his due and all. China, the WEF, Mark carney who is himself foreign interference, and the COMINTERN overall set the messaging for the CBC. So credit goes where it’s due, the first sentence is correct.

In case it disappears

The Twitter thread under this one makes for some interesting reading.

Tales from MINITRU: The appearance of grilling of a CBC executive

Posted on by

The head of the Ministry of Truth, or MINITRU as it will be called in the future, pitches for more money. The Opposition neglects the most important objection, that the MoT (CBC) actually creates narratives to remove rights from Canadians using everything from climate, forest fires, from non-0existent graves, to Covid and vaxx narratives etc etc. and for decades. Those old enough should remember the Nuclear Winter Line of Operation by CBC and the thousands of hours CBC broadcast that particular Maoist mass-line narrative attack on Western industry, may discover exactly what Orwell meant when he described the “Memory Hole” Winston Smith used to incinerate older versions of narratives, no longer in the interests of the revolution. In other words, you remember it, you can see David Suzuki in your head fear-mongering about it, but you won’t find a scrap of evidence for it. Memory Holed.

As to a lot of the other objections to this odious person which are primarily financial, I think Canadians gave up a long time ago caring about government spending. This is because the amounts are stratospheric and seem to bear no relevance to day to day life or carry consequences to anyone at all that people can feel immediately. No amount of complaining or pointing fingers at ledgers makes a difference,  And whatever government replaces the one going out does the same thing.

People handle things they understand. Which is why the CBC pushed the mass-line about Bev Oda charing a glass of Orange Juice for breakfast at a hotel while working for the govt. that costed $15.00. People understood that was a lot for a glass of orange juice, even though that was in fact the menu price. But the CBC studiously ignores Trudeau’s deliberate weaponization of debt to torpedo the country altogether, let alone his extravagant vacations.

The reason people have come to rightly and viscerally hate the CBC, is because it had the public trust, and then became the Voice of the COMINTERN, deceiving people even unto their deaths as with the vaccine, never giving a voice to any of the world-level scientists who questioned the technology. Instead, CBC ignored them, or dismissed them as anti-science conspiracy theorists. What they did to the general public with rational questions was contempt mixed with mockery.

When the CBC reported on someone in an ICU in Alberta, and it turned out to be a clothing store mannequin, no better example of mocking contempt of the Canadian people is needed.

Let’s listen to carrier journalist who had been with CBC as well, speak to it.

There are many more top shelf CBC journalists who have come out about the CBC’s agenda since the Covid line of operation started. All interested may wish to search Rumble for National Citizens Inquiry and search that channel for all CBC or journalism related testimonies. It is well worth it. Les’t we forget.

Action for Canada arranged a protest at the main CBC building Ottawa, Here is one of the speeches.

Rodney Palmer at NCI:

https://rumble.com/v2otumu-rodney-james-palmer-nci-testimony-from-ottawa-may-18-2023.html

Former CBC journalist: Marianne Klowak

https://rumble.com/v2oyl5e-cbc-whistleblower-marianne-klowak-at-the-nci-may-18-2023.html

Again, the NCI Rumble channel has a great deal more sworn testimony about how the CBC operated during Covid. But to be clear, to one degree or another, CBC has been operating for the COMINTERN agenda for a very long time. The Nuclear Winter, which pivoted to Global Warming, and then to Climate Change is the most obvious example.

Masterful if incomplete take-down of CBC in Parliamentary committee

Posted on by

The following video is solid gold and should be seen by everyone.

The following opinion is not criticism of the speaker or organization she represents.

If I had to speak to that committee and had that exact amount of time, I would likely have made the exact same points she made, and omitted the points I will list below, as to raise the issues I would like to make in point form would make them appear discreditable as well as myself as the speaker. So her speech in that video is indeed masterful.

Still, I would like to explain why her observations are the least of the issues with the CBC, even though one could argue that these issues below are a subset of the fact that they are state funded media.

The CBC is clearly an engine of (dialectical) destruction for all things Canadian and all things civilizational. In fact, when you accept that the motive of the CBC is to destroy, everything they do makes sense. Once again, the opposite of Hanlon’s Razor explains far more than the razor itself.

For a decade or more, the CBC promoted the narrative, championed as I recall as a life long Canadian by far left wing extremists and elite wealthy fruit fly scientist, David Suzuki, that the world was coming to an end due to “nuclear winter”. This was because in a Simpsons like, Mr. Burns fashion, industrial air pollution, the same stuff they now say is causing Global warming, will blot out the sun and cause us to go into a catastrophic ice age.

Ok. So maybe, the rational observer might say, they were wrong then and they are correct now. If that is the case, why is it impossible to find any CBC clips on Nuclear winter? They broadcast material on it constantly. Dozens or hundreds of speeches by Suzuki. If you search for Nuclear Winter on YouTube all you get is one short clip by Leonard Nimoy during his attempt to distance himself from his Star Trek character.

Which itself is ironic since they clearly chose that actor because of his character’s gravitas as a cold rational scientist, would add credibility to the notion of Nuclear Winter.

This indicates that they know they were lying. Had they just changed position because of new information, one would think they would correct the record. Not fully Winston Smith it out of existence. Which given the internet, is quite a feat.

This site has extensively detailed CBC’s attacks on the public throughout Covid. They invented experts who supported and amplified state narratives, while taking established experts who questioned these measures and assisted the state in everything from shadow banning them to defrocking and destroying them in star chamber like hearings like the various colleges, as well as the media. The CBC’s direct involvement in attempting to destroy Helen Grus, the Ottawa police detective is proof alone of their agenda as an agent of state destruction of a free west. They blackmailed the Ottawa Police force to do something about Helen’s investigation into something like 8 dead nursing infants in one week after the Vaxx roll out included pregnant and nursing mothers to see if there was a connection. The CBC threatened to tell the parents of the dead infants that she was looking into that possible connection.

(It is possible that one could say it wasn’t blackmail exactly as they published their story anyway. However I had heard that the author was forced in a law suit to retract some or all of what at least one CBC article said about her and the circumstances.)

As we have written extensively on this case, and a full detailed account can be found at RAIR as well as at https://donaldbest.ca there is no need to detail this much more here. But suffice it to say that what Helen did, which is to examine if the mothers of the dead infants had recently had an injection of an untested novel gene therapy that even Pfizer’s own documents stated should not be given to pregnant or nursing mothers, was a rational line of inquiry for a police officer who’s actual job was dealing with infant and child harm.

For the sake of those who haven’t read this site during Covid, one common CBC, CTV and Global Tactic would be to bring on politicians or anti-state actors from various related government bureaucracies and appear to challenge them on covid measures by asking why they didn’t do even more harsh measures and take away more rights than they have. This gave the illusion of speaking truth to power while in fact allowing a nascent totalitarian state to appear benevolent. Sort of like the Islamic god ‘Allah’, who they consider merciful as he doesn’t screw you over as hard as he could. This is also a standard Soviet tactic as well as appointing state approved experts to ‘represent the people.’

CBC and the other state media also obtained hacked information from Give Send Go about who contributed to a perfectly legal and rational protest against the forced use of experimental genetic therapy shots and other loss of constitutionally guaranteed rights, and then directly emailed the people who’s information had been leaked and asked them questions about their participation in anticipation of writing defamatory articles about them. Cleverly, they elected in the end not to do publish that particular line of attack. But the emails were indeed sent to those who contributed to the Freedom Convoy, and the questions where less journalistic, meaning asking genuine questions about why they felt they needed to support this protest, that they were the opening salvo in a Maoist struggle session. as well as opening them up to further state actions.

So defunding the CBC from our point of view is really just the most obvious first step.

Then the criminal trials must begin. After all, as state paid ‘journalists, they would have a fiduciary duty to inform Canadian citizens of the facts in order to allow Canadians to make the best choices in their own interests, and not submit to lines of operation of the state.

And that has at least a civil penalty attached to it, but can also be criminal.

 

Canada’s CBC as a weapon against the people, truth and the most basic of human rights

Posted on by

A few clips to remind us all why the CBC needs to be defunded and a committee must be established to determine if and with who, criminal liability resides.

It is also important to remember that even if those of us who did not want the vaxx were wrong, and it really was safe and effective, it would change nothing. A free people cannot be subjected to the measures we endured for 2 or more years. And for medical professionals it is still ongoing.

A few clips to remind us who and what CBC really is:

Please make sure you watch to the end for the ‘5 second command’.

According to the Twitter thread, the entire season with this material has been re released. This is one entire episode. Try and stay more than an arm’s reach away from the screen and if you are eating or drinking, use plastic cups and utensils.

 

 

Dr. Sam Dubé interviews veteran Canadian legacy media giant, Rodney Palmer on the new ‘hate-speech’ laws C-63

Posted on by

Rodney Palmer gave what might be the most important testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry on two occasions in terms of its implications for the conspiracy and complicity of the CBC and other Canadian media giants with the Covid regulations and vaccine propaganda

Rodney was a CBC corespondent stationed within China among other countries, and has first hand experience on similar laws.

Here is Rodney Palmer’s sworn testimony at the Ottawa NCI

Toronto testimony

 

 

Trump Derangement Syndrome, is really a variant of NDS Omicron at least, if not Pi or Rho

Posted on by

Those of us not actually infected with Trump Derangement syndrome and are old enough to clearly remember Bush, may remember that the media treated Bush the same way as they treat Trump, even if not quite as harshly. That is actually where the term was coined. “Bush Derangement Syndrome” was the first iteration of it, at least in memory. But for those even older, we may remember when the media showed constant hydrophobic rage at Nixon. If you wanted to have any degree of ‘cool’ at all, you had to really hate or mock Nixon. Then the 2IC of the FBI took him down by using a couple of ignorant and arguably scruple-less dupes at a major US Newspaper as couriers and beards. Career advancement by carrying documents from “Deepthroat”, a disgruntled FBI executive, to the editors at, all too predictably, The Washington Post with instructions to print without altering anything. Tough gig right? But great way to get a Pulitzer.

Suddenly what Lara Logan said about the prize falls into sharper relief.

One summer, there wasn’t much bad news to pin on GW Bush. So a mildly neurotic woman decided to camp out at the end of Bush’s driveway I think somewhere in Texas for the summer to protest the death of her son in the Iraq war. If memory serves, her name was Cindy Sheehan. And the media lapped this up and published regularly on Sheehan’s camping trip. Her family basically divorced her over it, again if memory serves. She was ventriloquizing her dead son as a weapon against Bush.

Her antics earned her a line in the brief internet hit song, Bush was Right:

One day during the presidency of GW Bush, I was having lunch with some old friends and some people I had never met before. One of them, a doctor at a Canadian forces base spoke out during the meal: “Well everyone hates Bush!”. I answered that actually I didn’t hate Bush. I didn’t say I liked him, just said I didn’t hate him. The response was a visceral and angry, “OH C’MON! YES YOU DO!” An instructive moment. Even back then you hate to hate who you had to hate or be excluded from polite company.

Going backwards to a previous Republican president who actually was the most popular ever up to that point, an entire Frankfurt School Critical Theory industry was spawned. A ‘journalist’ famous for constant and massive doses of mind altering drugs, ones that make you hallucinate things that aren’t there and not see things that are, became the vanguard of critical theory attacks on Nixon. His writing was very entertaining though, and Rolling Stone ended up having to print everything he wrote without editing. That did well for Rolling Stone. And one must add, his books are a really enjoyable read. From Hell’s Angels to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, his material are page turners. But not something upon which one may want to make serious decisions for oneself. Hunter S. Thompson wrote in a way that defied and even showed contempt for all the rules of journalism. But he did it very entertainingly, and even endearingly. When he wrote Hells Angels and told a story in it about how at a party people got extremely high and started firing guns out the window to show how extreme this motorcycle gang was, only to find as you read onwards that in fact it was Thompson himself who did that. Cute. Funny. But not journalism. Great writing, but the story was about him and his behaviour.

In the clip below, Nixon describes what he calls the “Media Elitist Complex”. That is brilliantly succinct. This site has called it the Government media complex since we started it. But Nixon’s name for the threat shows a great deal of insight. It also shows he was a man of the people. Like Trump. So no wonder they had to destroy him.

CBC to get a ninety six million dollar raise: Here is what it will do

Posted on by

Despite a shrinking viewership and a growing contempt for the enemy propaganda network, the CBC, already operating under the most unfair conditions, since they get enormous amounts of government money but also can take advertiser dollars, is getting a huge Trudeau scale raise. Nearly $100,000,000.00 more a year. The CBC article on this raise is confusing as it tries to simultaneously appear to be a victim of not having enough money to operate, while also claiming it asked for less money, and cut a large number of staff in anticipation of that requested pay cut. Yeah. Another mannequin in the ICU by the CBC.

The following videos have been posted before. But given that the CBC is getting an enormous raise, and one they ‘claim’ they didn’t ask for but needed to save CBC jobs, they are worth posting again. Anyone who has not seen them is well advised to watch, to understand to a small degree the nature of the CBC as a weapon against the Canadian people by the COMUNTERN. A delivery mechanism for Maoist mass line narrative attacks. You cannot even listen to a show about the number of crows in Kingston Ontario without it being a capsule for the Global Warming narrative. That is a real example. Not an exaggerated illustration. It only took 2 minutes of listening to CBC radio to hear that.

Under oath: Veteran senior CBC reporter: Marianne Klowak

Under oath: CBC reporter Rodney James Palemer

Q&A with Rodney Palmer

Ari speaks at a demonstration against the CBC

CBC reporter (Ret.) Rodney James Palmer first testimony in Toronto

Going over some old hard drives, I found this gem. All clips are from 2007 or earlier.