“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
There is a video on YouTube of a woman injecting herself into this speech at a ratio of about 3:1, meaning she speaks about three times as much as he does as she plays snippets of this speech and then interprets it in a way perfectly suited for those who would dismiss what he says as activist white supremacy. As opposed to what it is, A plea for European survival.
We chose to post the actual video of the Prince instead.
The following is a rather unusually good video from I think, German TV, or more likely a regular but professional podcast which we see more and more of these days.
They discuss the usual crime stats and so on, but they do discuss how the media and German state deliberately distorts factual information to create a false impression of whatever they are targeting for dialectic negation.
Put more simply, at one point they show a graph of Germans who want less immigration Vs. those who do not. They put arguably factual numbers in, but then misrepresent the graph to make it look much closer than it really was visually.
I say arguably, because who they call German many include paper germans, Muslims who live and think as Muslims and have zero connection to Germany, its history or culture other than a slip of paper given to them precisely to be used for this sort of purpose.
But this struck me as VERY familiar as a tactic. As I recall, the CBC did EXACTLY the same thing during Covid. I am doing my best to remember some other cases of this particular kind of very deliberate deception by state media, and as I recall, something similar happened in US media more than once as well.
I did manage to find this article about this CBC representation of Canada’s Covid cases in which a formal complaint was lodged about misrepresentation though.
…flash forward to the end of a spectacular hour long call with a friend and colleague and I got the answer I was looking for!
The article on this clip is at RAIR and has insight as well.
The bottom line to us is that this article does a good job of the usual exposing of truth, and a decent job of exposing the nature of the tactics by the state to make sure that people are diss informed about the true nature of Islam, immigration, and most importantly the State’s actual intentionality in its policies. But it still doesn’t get to the main course. The German state, like the Canadian one and British one and so on and so on, are using mass immigration along with the Global warming scam, the trans-scam, Covid, vaxx, bird flu etc. as dialectics. As vectors of attack to destroy everything we are. As Stephen says, to DERACINATE us. Obliterate our identity down past the roots.
This is interesting on a couple of levels. The actual content, which is a must see for sure, even if everyone knows the material. It is well packaged and I guess we can take some form of comfort seeing it expressed in official circles like this. But also because it does not take long till opposition manages to deflect the points he is making into a discussion about freedom of speech. This should not even be a discussion. We should all have it, and no less, Parliamentarians who are exposing the key strategic plan to destroy Europe forever.
But as you watch, even the speaker gets waylaid into losing his own point and engages in this distraction. Which speaks to Maj. Coughlin’s point perhaps, that you can know everything these is to know about Marxism and nothing about dialectics and we lose, but know everything about dialectics and nothing about Marxism and we win. Once you see these dialectical tactics deployed, it changes everything. They won’t work on you.
The good news is, he gets back on the horse and makes his points.
The most disappointing this is his claim that Geert Wilders’ party, the PVV, has entirely caved to globalism, and has only asked for the most trivial of changes to the mass immigration and EU demands.
The emphasis of this site and this author for the past little while has been trying to make the paradigm shift that is necessary to understand events around us in one specific way. That is the undoing of the intellectual sleight of hand known as ‘Hanlon’s Razor’. This is one of the more pernicious cons, as it allows people to see the consequences of profoundly damaging policy, even right in front of you, or that affects you directly, and dismiss it as mere chance due to incompetents. You get the satisfaction of thinking you are smarter than the people creating these circumstances, but are, by the same rhetorical tactic, self paralyzed into inaction.
Hanlon’s Razor goes like this: “Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence”. Or a dozen variations of the same theme. Some of them are as simple as, ‘Trudeau cannot possibly be doing what you are saying he is doing cause he is not that smart!’ This is fallacious on a couple of levels. For one, it is as already stated, a variation of Hanlon’s Razor. His intelligence is assumed to be low, therefore his policies must be well intentioned, but incompetent, The other is that great intelligence is required. But great intelligence is not a necessity at all.
Think of a 5 year old child in Peking speaking perfect Mandarin, or at least as perfect as a 5 year old would. Then think about the effort it would take us to learn Mandarin to that level if we didn’t speak a word of it now. We would have to use a lot of effort and intellect to learn it even close. So it goes with dialectical thought. It is a different system of thought, and easy if raised in it, but very difficult if not, and doubly so if you find it a repugnant way of thinking. Which it most certainly is.
Still, failure to understand the intent of the destructive policies around us and dismissing it as idiocy, (while often it may seem like a great comfort) is why no one mounts a defence. Even those who do understand the issue in depth have to be careful how to address the intent, as even those who wish to initiate a solution will swell with sanctimony and object to any solution that might actually work for failure to understand the intent of these policies. For example, people who might say that recognizing Islam as a threat doctrine, monitoring mosques, deporting any and all Muslims who preach sedition and jihad and insurrection and so on, will be met even from people who think they are on the side of the West with insults or sanctimonious defence of freedom of religion and other related but misapplied Western liberties. And just to crush this one right out of the box, The United States declared Political Shinto illegal after Pearl Harbour because, as the reasoning goes, one cannot use the Constitution to undermine the Constitution. The same is easily applied to Islam.
It is with this in mind that I post this older video from some point after Obama/Biden term 3 restarted the destruction of the US along Cloward Piven lines. The fact that Biden offered up for sale parts of the US border wall that President Trump built in his first term was more than even what is below. It was a direct insult to the American people. An act of contempt. Something we have seen from Obama/Biden numerous times now.
Great to hear, but frustrating cause we all know exactly nothing will change, they will attempt to quel anyone speaking obvious truth, and like the mayor of a small Ontario town that decided to fight the “Human Rights Commission”, will likely get debanked and worse. Maybe re watch the interveiw with Rasmus Paludan for an example of what he can expect.
Although every word of what this European Parliamentarian says is true and would work, I have a couple of problems with it all.
Now I need someone far more knowledgeable about the intricacies of the Soviet Politburo European Union to fact check me on this. But I believe the actual elected parliament in the EU is kind of a Punch and Judy puppet show in front of the actual power, which is the European Commission.
Let’s see what Vladimir Bukovsky has to say about how it works.
If we compare the internal structure of the two unions, [The Soviet Union and the European Union] we discover a striking similarity. The Soviet Union was run by 15 people, never elected by anyone, members of the political committee of the Communist Party, they appointed each other to the positions, they were not accountable to anyone. The European Union is led by 25 commissioners, also never elected by anyone, members of the European Commission, and they are also not accountable to anyone, and they cannot be replaced either. The common feature of the Soviet and Brussels bodies is that a significant part of their decisions and evaluations are not public. Just a recent example from Brussels.
Christopher Davis, a professor at the University of Oxford, recently revealed in an interview with Magyar Hírlap that Brussels prepared a secret study, the content of which was not shared with EU citizens. According to E, the sanctions decisions against Russia were made too quickly, and all of this was done under political pressure, and there was no prior economic impact study. The EU did not make any plan about the impact of the sanctions, it decided randomly.
In an ideological sense, the similarity between the Soviet and Brussels systems is even more striking, but perhaps in this case it is more appropriate to speak of identity. The goal of the Soviet Union was to create a new historical community, the “Soviet people”, the “socialist type of man”. Everyone was indoctrinated to forget their nationality, traditions and customs. The European Union does not want to see Frenchmen, Germans, Hungarians, Poles, etc. either. He wants a new historical community to be created, everyone to be European, suppress all national feelings and live in a multinational community.
So as thrilling as it is to see this MEP actually offer practical solutions to the problem, indicating that at least he understands the reality of the problem more than we are used to by those who have the pretence of representing our political interests, it feels more like WWE in the light of how the actual legislative body works. The wrestler who represents the average American enters the ring. The crowd cheers. Some folding chairs are broken, People either leave frustrated waiting for a rematch, or leave vindicated imagining that good has conquered evil. But like Brexit, the vote to leave the EU did not seem to have any practical effect in terms of restoring the national sovereignty of the United Kingdom whatsoever.
Mass migration increased and without checking I bet the Brits did not get their fishing or any other rights back from the EU.
There may be information at this link, although I think its just a transcript of this video below.
We all know there is insanity coming to the world, and especially the USA up until and for a while after the Nov. 5th elections. This is clearly part of it.
I guess when the cost benefit of telling the truth for moral people tips towards telling the truth, things are very, very bad. At least that would be the formula in a communist country, where truth is hate speech, and its cost is high,
Details on who this guy is can be read at RAIR
Here are two routes to the interview. Below from Jesse’s Rumble channel, and a link to Tucker Carlson Network that appears to work even if you don’t have a membership.
The Rumble version is only half of the interview. So if you are able to watch on the TCN that is your ticket to the whole interview.
Thank you Oz-Rita
There is a profound uptick in antisemitic attacks across the West, both by muslims, and their proxies on the left, and by weak organizations that cave to both. The larger threat to democracies of course, are where august organizations submit to demands or threats by muslim groups, and cancel participants, or even speakers or the even the keynote person at an event because they are Jewish, and may or may not have any connection to Israel. It was repugnant when we did it to Russians and it is no less repugnant now. RAIR Foundation wrote up some of those. This one in Australia is an excellent example of the state of democracy there. It also makes one wonder how much of this is the revenge of the Nazis. After all, Soros was a Nazi, Soros funded the vast migration of Muslims into Western lands. Soros worked with all those who effectively criminalized speaking the truth about Islam and its anti-civilizational, antisemitic core dogma and goals out loud.
The results of a vast Muslim migration anywhere are totally predictable. We can say that with some confidence, because this site has been predicting it since 2008 and it started doing so after reading sites like gatesofvienna.net which has been doing it much longer. Not to mention Bill Warner, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders and many many many more. How Geert Wilders has had to live since speaking clear and obvious provable truth about Islam would, back when reason was the foundation of our cultures, been enough to change immigration policies. After all, one needs only look at 1: if there are any minorities in Islamic lands, and where there are, 2: how they are treated, to know how this is going to go. Then there is history, but you have to get a book published before they Winston Smithed them all. Then there is what the jihadis say when they kill a bunch of people. Yet pointing these out are the left equivalent of blasphemy laws, “hate speech”. Like Islamic blasphemy laws, anything which is a threat to the leftist ideology or its enforcers is “hate speech” especially when it’s true. Exactly like blasphemy laws.
Here is a rather stellar example of exactly that:
A few more examples of the effect of mass migration of Muslims into the West from the last number of hours:
Switzerland: RAIR article here.
But it isn’t just we common folk that have to worry at this stage of the replacement:
British lawmakers fear for their safety after threats and abuse over Gaza
LONDON, Feb 28 (Reuters) – It was 10 minutes of shouted accusations of being a “genocide enabler” and having “blood on your hands” that made a British lawmaker fear for his safety over his decision to voice support for Israel in its war with Hamas.Almost touching noses with his accuser before walking away and warning he would call the police, the opposition Labour Party member said the incident in a town in his constituency was just the latest of several that made him change his behaviour.He now makes sure he sits near the door on public transport and limits meetings with the public.“It feels like it could just need one spark to flip from someone giving you tuppence (criticism) in the street to escalating to actual violence,” the lawmaker said.After the Oct. 7 Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza, more than 10 British politicians spoken to by Reuters said the abuse directed at them had become more intense. At least one cited this as a factor in deciding not to seek a new term in parliament in an election later this year.
A group of Muslims in Ottawa Canada has used the logo of the University of Ottawa to brand its propaganda:
For reasons that will become apparent as you watch, we will call this, The Red Dawn interview
This seems to belong in this post as well. Mark Levin on Chinese purchase of US politicians
The following documentary is by two brothers who followed the entire invasion of the US route from start to the US. They found UN stations all along the way giving support.
The UN is the COMINTERN. Like the Democrat Party at this point. This documentary is a must watch to understand how Biden along with the COMINTERN are attempting to destroy the nation state altogether, and create a world with no culture and no human rights. Once the US is gone, it is not easy to imagine how any people will manage to escape this fate.
The two brothers who made this video appeared on FOX last night in an interview. Once we find that clip we will add it to this post.
This will be updates later with significantly more information about the interview subject, Hans-Georg Maaßen. But for now, please watch and pay attention up to the last word.
Special thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation. More on this at RAIR
A few years ago, we covered incidents in a town called Chemnitz in Germany. Going by memory, an illegal migrant welcomed by Merkel, raped and killed a woman in that town. In fact many people had been killed by muslim migrants in Chemnitz. The residents had enough and did a march and demonstration with the photos of the victims. ANTIFA had their own weaponized media there and had arranged to have a migrant attacked by people who appeared to be with the demonstration. A classic False Flag that would have made Hitler or Trudeau flush with pride.
As memory serves, they had a migrant harass and otherwise bother protestors until a few of them broke away and chased him away. The chasing away of course, was filmed and broadcast. I guess a variant of what George Soros would call using ‘reactivity’. Like when Muslim terrorists wage a second attack against the first responders to the initial attack.
The German state used this false-flag attack to justify clamping down on the right of the people of Chemnitz to grieve publicly and demand they be protected from illegals.
But the man who was head of what one might say is the equivalent of the Inteligence Oversight in Germany, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the man in the interview above, revealed the facts about the attack. Shortly after, he was removed from his position. Much like General Vance in Canada for refusing to attack the people of Canada with a disinformation operation, except he was taken out of the armed services, while Hans was moved to a different position with a similar salary but wouldn’t be as much of a threat to state tactics.
Here are some links of stories we did at the time. The servers where the videos had been stored are now gone. But as time permits I will try and find them and restore them somewhere else.
Here is one of the key videos restored that tells the story as it happened:
More may be added later. But this should be enough to get a pretty clear picture as to who Hans-Georg Maasen is and the events that brought Germany to where it is now.
UPDATE: Here is a video exposing one of the “Nazis” in Chemnitz as actually being a communist activist.