Thank you Geert Wilders. This is exactly correct
Category Archives: Political Correctness
Gingrich grows weary of Soviet style media
While the focus of the site remains on Islam, when you live next to an elephant it is prudent to take notice when it gets rabies.
Speaking of Soviet like media, please take whatever time necessary and read this article from The New American on how Obama’s state department demanded a bail out for a full blown Soviet communist paper in Hungary.
Then add to that, Obama’s interference in Brexit and the Israeli and very possibly Canadian federal elections and one begins to get a pretty clear picture.
Thank you Ilona Szilágyi, Richard, M., Gates of Vienna and many who sent in related links. The Hungarian paper story deserves about a thousand times more media attention than it will get. So once again, its down to us. And thank you to all who have sent in the information on the daily links posts.
Once again, a lot of my time is spent on subtitling videos and researching related issues. So not as much makes it to the posts as deserves to. So please everyone, check the Reader’s links. There is a lot of important content from a lot of observant people.
Installment 2 of the Muslim migrants in Canadian schools issues from The Rebel
Installment 1 can be seen here.
The Hungary Referendum and Mainstream Media Spin
By Ilona Szilágyi
There seems to be a common theme across the leftist media outlets today as news spreads of the results of Hungary’s referendum on EU migrant quotas. Pervasive are words that fit the leftist narrative such as “defeat” and “failure”.
One particular article referenced Viktor Orban as “…a cartoonish leader” and stated that he now “…stands humiliated”.
What is cartoonish is the reporting. What is humiliating is the seemingly total lack of due diligence applied to an unfortunate number of “news” stories today.
A quick search provides one with all of the data required to fully comprehend the significance of what took place in Hungary yesterday, and what one will find is remarkable.
In 2003, Hungary held their referendum on whether or not they should join the EU. That received only a 45.6% turnout and of those who voted, only 83% (38% of registered voters) were for joining.
Yesterday’s turnout was quite comparable at 43%. What is not comparable are the results that showed only 1.56% (less than 1% of registered voters) voted “Yes”. This means that 92% (40% of all registered voters) said “No” to the forced migration. If we disregard blank or invalid votes, this increases to 98%.
That is significant. There isn’t a single polling company in the known universe that would not consider 43% to be a sufficient enough cross-section from which to extrapolate.
This is anything but a failure. This not only demonstrates where the Hungarian people actually sit on this issue, but it absolutely provides a strong case for Hexit.
Bashy Quraishy of EMISCO inverts the moral facts at the OSCE
The video you are about to see shows Bashy Quraishy attempting to level the playing field between the Jews of the holocaust and muslims of today. He is equating the false construct of “islamophobia” with anti-semitism. Remarkable, considering that Islam is, by its very doctrine, anti-semetic.
Before you view the video on how Bashy Quraishy draws the ludicrous comparison between Muslims today and the Jews of the holocaust, first, you must consider the Fatiha that the “faithful” recite on a daily basis.
“All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the lord of the ‘Alamin’ (mandkind, jinn and all that exists.) The most Gracious, the Most Merciful. The Only Owner (and the Only Ruling Judge” of the Day of Recompense (i.e. the Day of Resurrection. You (Alone) we worship, and you (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything.)
Guide us to the Straight Way. The way of those whom You have bestowed your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians.)”
Now the facts:
From The Investigative Project:
Study Exposes the Ugly Depth of European Muslim Anti-Semitism
A new study published by the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy (ISGAP) confirms what many have long suspected: that the worst crimes against Jews in Europe are perpetrated by (European) Muslims, and that Muslims have been responsible for a “disproportionate” number of anti-Semitic attacks over the past 15 years.
And it isn’t just about Israel.
Overall, trends in Jew-hate have fluctuated by country since the beginning of this century. For the most part, reports of anti-Semitism are lower now than they were during the “second intifada” of 2008-2009 despite terrorist attacks on Jews in Brussels, Copenhagen and Paris in the past year alone. But anti-Semitic incidents have risen substantially from 1990s levels; and while, as the ISGAP report notes, “surveys on anti-Semitism that distinguish between Muslims and non-Muslims” have been subject to criticism, “the sum of available studies to date provides strong evidence that the level of anti-Semitism is indeed particularly high among Muslims.”
And so what we see in Mr. Quraishy’s presentation, is a total moral inversion as well as a false equivalence. He actually attempts to create moral authority for Muslims by making them equivalent to the victims to the people who the Muslims themselves victimize.
He does this in order to get the authority to silence those who criticize Islam and Muslims, usually by revealing the truths about the ideology and its observance.
Basically he is that old joke about the child that murders his parents and then beg the court for mercy on the strength that he’s an orphan.
But worse. Because he also wants to silence the witnesses on the same basis.
Ilona Szilágyi & Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
Authoritative article on how Google may be working with Obama’s CVE narrative
At last, an industry expert has published an article about Google search engine bias, explaining exactly how Google searches are supposed to objectively work, but demonstrating that they are, in fact, functioning with illiberalism.
In this article at Free Speech Defense, the author explains the mechanisms by which Google chooses what to place in its results and in what order it should appear. When these results repeatedly return content or links with high rankings that are inconsistent with Google’s own criteria, it is reasonable to assume that an agenda may be the influence.
More specifically, when each time someone searches for “Jihad” and a link to a website appears in the top three results, when there is no statistical basis for this ranking (it a minor site with little-to-no maintenance), one has to wonder.
And, when said site completely supports the Obama-Clinton line that “Islam is a religion of peace and there are just a few bad Muslims”, when the operators of the site are, themselves, fringe Muslims, then speculation that Google is propagating Obama’s CVE narrative (see Stephen Coughlin’s paper, Burning Down the House) becomes plausible. That narrative being a deliberate distortion of truth at many levels for a political purpose, and one that is clearly detrimental to classical civilization.
Fun fact: Google is the company that visits the White House more than any other, and has visited on average more than once per week since Obama was elected.
Letting a Corsican hero represent himself
Earlier today, we posted a video, perhaps somewhat of a smear piece, on a Corsican Facebook Vid-blogger who has a very large following.
Many worthy comments followed.
Oz-Rita explained that the German media company that made it is horrifically biased to the left as well as antisemitic.
Sunshine posted a link to the whole video he made, explaining that DW had in fact used an excerpt of it out of context to make him look bad.
M posted the Youtube version of it in French.
So Ava Lon has translated it for us and here is the titled version so we can decide for ourselves.
David Menzies at Rebel does a good job of parsing another fake racism charge
I only wish he had pointed out that Islam isn’t a race, and behaviours that people choose to follow in a country where it is not obligatory means you may find parts of society that do not fit with your behaviours, and none of this has anything to do with race.
Al Jazeera reporters on crash site minutes after Russian heli brought down
Al Jazeera reporters on scene minutes after a fatal crash of a Russian Heli. Russians wondering why.
The most creative explanation is at the Twitter link above:
WARNING: Very disturbing video of the savages dragging a Russian helicopter crew member who’s clothes have burned off behind them chanting the only phrase muslims seem to know while he is followed by what I think are Al Jazeera reporters.
H/T M.
Milo speaks at the RNC today on political correctness and Islam
Clever tactic showing hypocrisy of Democrat gun-banners
Married couple sentenced for anti immigration Facebook group
An original translation by Nash Montana
From Merkur.De
Vierkirchen – A Vierkirchen couple was in front of the district court in Dachau being accused of sedition. The husband had created a group that was hostile towards refugees.
Due to the supposed anonymity on the internet, the number of rightwing radical language groups is increasing. But a married couple from Vierkirchen found out that there is no guaranteed anonymity. About a year ago, Peter M., 27, created a facebook group called “Anti Refugee Movement”. Since he and his wife, Melanie M., 26, are the administrators of the group, they now had to stand trial in court for the charge of sedition.
M.’s description of the group was, “The war and economic refugees are swarming our country. They bring terror, fear, suffering. They rape our women and put our children in danger. It has to be stopped.” He added a picture of the German flag – and just like that, the creation of a radical rightwing group was finished, so says Judge Lukas Neubeck.
The group grew astoundingly fast: In only two months, it gained 900 members. One Facebook user however, whose disposition was in direct opposition to that of M., stumbled over the group and reported it to the administration of the social network. They checked the group – and found it to be indiscriminate.
Therefore the Facebook user went to a police station in Lübeck. They found out that the group was created on a PC from Vierkirchen. So they forwarded the case to the Kripo (Criminal Police) in Fürstenfeldbruck.
The couple came without their lawyer, she had – according to Judge Lukas Neubeck – laid down her mandate right before the main trial. They brought their ten month old son who sat on his mothers lap during the trial.
“One can’t even say anything critical at all to the topic of refugees without immediately being branded a Nazi. I just wanted to create a forum for discussion where people could voice their opinions about the refugees. I’ve never gave it much thought as to the exact phrasing, I didn’t mean it like that”, the accused tried to justify himself.
M. kept asserting that he checked out all members of the group and that he had repeatedly suggested in his posts that he didn’t want to read any radical rightwing utterances – but he couldn’t prove it, the group has been deleted in the meantime.
After repeated inquiry by Judge Neubeck, M. then said at some point that he doesn’t actually have anything to do with refugees, and that he distances himself. That the only thing that bothers him is “the actions of the chancellor”. M. used the male ‘Kanzler’, instead of female ‘Kanzlerin’ in front of the judge, to which Neubeck indicated to him that Germany has a female chancellor and not a male chancellor. “Furthermore you are exactly not distancing yourself with this group from refugees. The description of the group is a stringing together of pure generalizations with a very clear radical rightwing background.”
M. was sentenced to nine months prison on probation, and his wife was sentenced to a monetary fine of 120 daily rates at 10 Euro. Judge Neubeck: “I hope that you understand the seriousness of the situation. If I find you sitting here again on the bench, you will land in prison.”
[Ed: Immigration is a government policy. One of the most important ones. The right to criticize it is the central pillar of democratic procedure. Imprisoning those who dare question it is defacto totalitarianism.]
AfD party rejects meaningless red/green (Culturally Marxist) action plan
From the AfD website:
The AfD party at the state parliament in Brandenburg spoke against the “Action plan for acceptance of gender and sexual diversity, for self determination, and against homo and transphobia in Brandenburg”.
“We reject this kind of egomaniac politicizing. We do not achieve equality through ideology and we cannot destroy discrimination this way”, says Steffen Königer, speaker for social-political matters of the AfD.
During the debate at the parliament Königer addressed in his speech 60 possible gender descriptions. “I didn’t want to insult anybody, I wanted to show this ideological insanity of the red/green action plan”, he said.
“The reaction of many of the delegates of other parties, many of which had a hard time keeping themselves from laughing out loud, showed me that my intro made people think.”
The from the SPD, Left party and Bündnis 90/The Green Party developed action plan is supposed to improve “the legal and social equality of lesbians, gays, bi-, trans-, intersexual and queer (LSBTTIQ*) in Brandenburg.
German media does a hit piece on German citizens who stopped a violent thief and detained him for police
State-supported leftist mob harasses dentist because he is a member of the AfD
An original translation by Nash Montana
From this German News site:
For years, Dentist Dr. Marius Radtke?(64) has been treating patients in his praxis at the Pistoriusstraße in Weißensee.
Marius Radtke works as a volunteer in the function of spokesman for the Lichtenberg district association of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. This has turned him into the target of left-wing groups who are determined to make his life difficult.
They dropped “warnings” into the mailboxes in the neighborhood, which were meant to inform patients that their dentist was a member of the “racist, un-social and hypocritical AfD party”.
Then they sent warnings to the other dental practices in the area and asked the “dear praxis teams” not to refer any more patients to Dr.?Radtke. In this manner they have tried to ruin the dentist economically since April 13. On their portal, ”antifascist Initiative”, the leftists celebrate themselves about this action, using the motto: “Pulling out Germany’s teeth!”
Demonstration in front of dentist praxis
Then, on Thursday, May 12, it happened: 60 black-clad people demonstrated in front of the dentist’s practice. The police secured the door behind which Dr.? Radtke worked with his dentist’s drill in hand, while they hurled insults at him from the street.
The march to the dentist’s office, which used the title “Weissensee ist bunt”, (Weissensee is colorful), was supported by three groups. One of the groups is the “Willkommensnetzwerk Pankow Hilft” (Welcome Network Pankow Helps). This network receives direct financial aid by the federal government, specifically the Ministry for Family.
“Pankow Hilft” is the recipient of plenty of praise and favorable mentions in public for their voluntary work with migrants and asylum seekers.
Now, the helpers have turned up at Pistoriusstrasse, however not to help, but to insult a dentist because he is a member of the AfD.
All this happened a week ago. [Ed: at the time of writing. It may be a few weeks ago now] The public wasn’t mentionably upset about it. And that may be the worst yet. Because if this becomes the norm, that people because of their political preferences can be harassed by an angry mob with the goal that said person then won’t be able to keep on practicing his livelihood, then Democracy has come to an end. Then we will enter very quickly into a new age of street fights.
Berlin city officials cloaked in silence
In April, the minister president of Thüringen, Bodo Ramelow (Left) had in clear language vehemently condemned the demonstration of left extremists in front of the residence of AfD leading figure Björn Höcke. Ramelow spoke of “nazi-tactics”.
It’s with this same kind of bluntness that the campaign against the Berlin dentist should have also been condemned. But the city leader cloaked himself in silence. As did other politicians, of whom not a word was heard from as well.
If one wishes to dispute Dr. Radtke, they should invite him to a discussion. But that is apparently not at all what these left marchers want. They want to finish a person, because they don’t like him.
The above post was translated by Nash a week or so ago and it got lost in the cracks. But there is an update now.
Please watch the video below: