“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
There is a video on YouTube of a woman injecting herself into this speech at a ratio of about 3:1, meaning she speaks about three times as much as he does as she plays snippets of this speech and then interprets it in a way perfectly suited for those who would dismiss what he says as activist white supremacy. As opposed to what it is, A plea for European survival.
We chose to post the actual video of the Prince instead.
The following is a rather unusually good video from I think, German TV, or more likely a regular but professional podcast which we see more and more of these days.
They discuss the usual crime stats and so on, but they do discuss how the media and German state deliberately distorts factual information to create a false impression of whatever they are targeting for dialectic negation.
Put more simply, at one point they show a graph of Germans who want less immigration Vs. those who do not. They put arguably factual numbers in, but then misrepresent the graph to make it look much closer than it really was visually.
I say arguably, because who they call German many include paper germans, Muslims who live and think as Muslims and have zero connection to Germany, its history or culture other than a slip of paper given to them precisely to be used for this sort of purpose.
But this struck me as VERY familiar as a tactic. As I recall, the CBC did EXACTLY the same thing during Covid. I am doing my best to remember some other cases of this particular kind of very deliberate deception by state media, and as I recall, something similar happened in US media more than once as well.
I did manage to find this article about this CBC representation of Canada’s Covid cases in which a formal complaint was lodged about misrepresentation though.
…flash forward to the end of a spectacular hour long call with a friend and colleague and I got the answer I was looking for!
The article on this clip is at RAIR and has insight as well.
The bottom line to us is that this article does a good job of the usual exposing of truth, and a decent job of exposing the nature of the tactics by the state to make sure that people are diss informed about the true nature of Islam, immigration, and most importantly the State’s actual intentionality in its policies. But it still doesn’t get to the main course. The German state, like the Canadian one and British one and so on and so on, are using mass immigration along with the Global warming scam, the trans-scam, Covid, vaxx, bird flu etc. as dialectics. As vectors of attack to destroy everything we are. As Stephen says, to DERACINATE us. Obliterate our identity down past the roots.
This is interesting on a couple of levels. The actual content, which is a must see for sure, even if everyone knows the material. It is well packaged and I guess we can take some form of comfort seeing it expressed in official circles like this. But also because it does not take long till opposition manages to deflect the points he is making into a discussion about freedom of speech. This should not even be a discussion. We should all have it, and no less, Parliamentarians who are exposing the key strategic plan to destroy Europe forever.
But as you watch, even the speaker gets waylaid into losing his own point and engages in this distraction. Which speaks to Maj. Coughlin’s point perhaps, that you can know everything these is to know about Marxism and nothing about dialectics and we lose, but know everything about dialectics and nothing about Marxism and we win. Once you see these dialectical tactics deployed, it changes everything. They won’t work on you.
The good news is, he gets back on the horse and makes his points.
The most disappointing this is his claim that Geert Wilders’ party, the PVV, has entirely caved to globalism, and has only asked for the most trivial of changes to the mass immigration and EU demands.
The emphasis of this site and this author for the past little while has been trying to make the paradigm shift that is necessary to understand events around us in one specific way. That is the undoing of the intellectual sleight of hand known as ‘Hanlon’s Razor’. This is one of the more pernicious cons, as it allows people to see the consequences of profoundly damaging policy, even right in front of you, or that affects you directly, and dismiss it as mere chance due to incompetents. You get the satisfaction of thinking you are smarter than the people creating these circumstances, but are, by the same rhetorical tactic, self paralyzed into inaction.
Hanlon’s Razor goes like this: “Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence”. Or a dozen variations of the same theme. Some of them are as simple as, ‘Trudeau cannot possibly be doing what you are saying he is doing cause he is not that smart!’ This is fallacious on a couple of levels. For one, it is as already stated, a variation of Hanlon’s Razor. His intelligence is assumed to be low, therefore his policies must be well intentioned, but incompetent, The other is that great intelligence is required. But great intelligence is not a necessity at all.
Think of a 5 year old child in Peking speaking perfect Mandarin, or at least as perfect as a 5 year old would. Then think about the effort it would take us to learn Mandarin to that level if we didn’t speak a word of it now. We would have to use a lot of effort and intellect to learn it even close. So it goes with dialectical thought. It is a different system of thought, and easy if raised in it, but very difficult if not, and doubly so if you find it a repugnant way of thinking. Which it most certainly is.
Still, failure to understand the intent of the destructive policies around us and dismissing it as idiocy, (while often it may seem like a great comfort) is why no one mounts a defence. Even those who do understand the issue in depth have to be careful how to address the intent, as even those who wish to initiate a solution will swell with sanctimony and object to any solution that might actually work for failure to understand the intent of these policies. For example, people who might say that recognizing Islam as a threat doctrine, monitoring mosques, deporting any and all Muslims who preach sedition and jihad and insurrection and so on, will be met even from people who think they are on the side of the West with insults or sanctimonious defence of freedom of religion and other related but misapplied Western liberties. And just to crush this one right out of the box, The United States declared Political Shinto illegal after Pearl Harbour because, as the reasoning goes, one cannot use the Constitution to undermine the Constitution. The same is easily applied to Islam.
It is with this in mind that I post this older video from some point after Obama/Biden term 3 restarted the destruction of the US along Cloward Piven lines. The fact that Biden offered up for sale parts of the US border wall that President Trump built in his first term was more than even what is below. It was a direct insult to the American people. An act of contempt. Something we have seen from Obama/Biden numerous times now.
First, a fun little video from Germany. To decrypt one of the lines of lyrics, remember that AfD uses a specific colour of Blue, and for a while during elections, certain businesses were actually banning the colour blue or writing articles about not allowing blue.
In terms of how Germans should feel about all this, if they knew the extent to which the Cloward-Piven plan had destroyed Germany and all the Western societies that operate on trust and reasonable expectation of safety for women and freedom of speech to criticize religious and political authorities, this is about 10% as happy as they likely really are.
Normalcy wins in Austria: Of course, “Far right” means anyone who believes in what made Europe great and a place the entire freaking world is willing to risk their lives and pay 5 figures to break into and ruin for 2000 years.
And in Germany, they are expecting to deport 500 a week, Which is probably a tenth of what comes in but you have to start somewhere.
https://twitter.com/Klaus_Arminius/status/1829594733032714391
Freude!
https://twitter.com/kunley_drukpa/status/1839323052422902253
Some more propaganda from The Express.
What EU chiefs are banking on after Right-wing Austrian surge sparks fears in Brussels
The hard-Right Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) has won the Austrian general election. The anti-mass migration and Eurosceptic party – considered sympathetic to Russia in a country known for its nuanced approach to East-West ties – is heading for a win on 30 percent of the vote, ahead of the mainstream conservatives on around 26 percent and the Left-leaning Social Democrats on a little over 20 percent.
In principle this should be a major headache for Brussels – off the back of the FPÖ’s recent success in European Union elections and given the party’s stance towards mass immigration, the EU and Ukraine, including re-migration policies. Still, the EU may be able to breathe a sigh of relief, even if the trendlines for the bloc remain worrying.
For starters, the FPÖ will struggle to find coalition partners, unless it compromises its ideas or excludes its leaders from power. This was the position Geert Wilders found himself in after the Dutch election, while the example of Giorgia Meloni in Italy demonstrates EU nationalists – once in power – often find themselves compromising heavily to accommodate to EU norms.
At this point we all have to grab our communist to English translation dictionaries. “Hard-Right” means not communist. “Eurosceptic” means rejecting the COMINTERN. “Anti-Mass migration” is pretty straight forward actually. Although one could say means anti-civilizational-suicide. But that is an interpretation on consequence, albeit an accurate one, more than a direct translation from dialectics to reality. “Sympathetic to Russia” likely means not wanting to go to war against them. Mainstream conservative parties across the West are all captured. None of them are mainstream conservative in views or policies. This is also true in Canada if you look at Poilievre’s voting record on any social issue. On any issue actually. The Third paragraph should be read carefully. They manage to say all that without choking on their donuts writing for a newspaper that pretends to republican values. “Geert Wilders found himself…” No. the COMINTERN saw to it that despite the fact that Wilders’ PVV party overwhelmingly won a national election he would not be allowed to be the PM and his policies would not be enacted. he didn’t “Find himself” in the position, other than how say, Donald Trump keeps “finding himself” in positions where people are shooting at him. A total reversal of agency, which is a classic tactic of the left.
Conservatives will ALWAYS be guilty in any action because either they did it and it was a bad thing to do, or it was done to them and they had it coming. Islam operates by the same principle. They are more honest about it though. NOn Muslims are always guilty, because they are guilty of being non-muslims. It is actually refreshing compared to the leftist constant word salad.
Don’t take it from me. Here is one of the few really honest Muslims, Lawyer turned jihadi, Anjem Choudary:
Anyway, back to the good news:
This is cool. But needs interpretation.
Full text:
Germany’s chancellor Olaf Scholz has announced plans to “deport on a grand scale”.
CDU leader Friedrich Merz has accused Berlin neighbourhoods of not being adequately German and has demanded new immigrants to Germany declare their allegiance to Israel.
Left wing German politician MP Sahra Wagenknecht says “there shouldn’t be any neighbourhoods where natives are in the minority.”
Joachim Stamp from the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), has said that Germany must “finally make progress on repatriation agreements” with non-EU countries to facilitate the deportations.
The government must act “to avoid more and more people arriving,” says Ricarda Lang, the Green Party co-chair has said.
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has warned that Germany “is at breaking point,” as 162,000 people applied for asylum in the country within the first half of the year.
Even the widely respected former German President Joachim Gauck has criticized the current government and called for more radical solutions to curb the numbers of asylum seekers.
“Deals with non EU countries…” Let’s wait and see. So far, any swing that appears to be away from COMINTERN dominance has been a con. Like the referendum that was held on ONE EU country to adopt a European Union Constitution, which right away was against the whole point of the EU as it was sold to the people, and was rejected. They just kept holding the referendums in other nations till they got the results they wanted, and then that was that. All EU states had to abide by it. Meloni? I don’t see any evidence of the things she promised. In fact I see the persecution and prosecution of Salvini continuing. He may spend years in jail for stopping an NGO from committing a crime. Salvini when in the cabinet, actually prevented illegal migrants from stepping off an NGO boat that was smuggling illegals into Europe on the basis that, well they were illegal. He had arranged for Spain to take them. But he is under indictment for kidnapping, because he wouldn’t let the boat land and disembark exactly where it wanted to, in Italy. Illegally. This is dialectic application of the law.
At this point we remain very skeptical of Alberta’s Danielle Smith as well. She actually said out loud, the exact BS of the Century Initiative that Alberta had to import millions of foreiners to do stuff for each other, or whatever the excuse is. This would of course, crush Alberta as a culture and a history forever. If she does this, and frankly even saying this, cancels everything else she said. Even if she passes the new Alberta Constitution that guarantees US style rights on its citizens, it means exactly nothing if the culture of the people in that province is diluted to extinction by Muslims or other people with zero frame of reference on individual rights, and actual tolerance of others as we always knew the term, as opposed to the dialectical use of it now, which is to allow non-Western people to negate and be intolerant of you.
Does she mean Canadians moving from other provinces? Maybe, That would make sense as Alberta would be the only Canadian province left soon if she creates a free and Republic style polity there. But other speeches I have heard of hers indicate she means the same kind of Immigration Canada is getting.
This kind:
Thank you all for reading this site.
Remain skeptical. Avoid being cynical.
Although every word of what this European Parliamentarian says is true and would work, I have a couple of problems with it all.
Now I need someone far more knowledgeable about the intricacies of the Soviet Politburo European Union to fact check me on this. But I believe the actual elected parliament in the EU is kind of a Punch and Judy puppet show in front of the actual power, which is the European Commission.
Let’s see what Vladimir Bukovsky has to say about how it works.
If we compare the internal structure of the two unions, [The Soviet Union and the European Union] we discover a striking similarity. The Soviet Union was run by 15 people, never elected by anyone, members of the political committee of the Communist Party, they appointed each other to the positions, they were not accountable to anyone. The European Union is led by 25 commissioners, also never elected by anyone, members of the European Commission, and they are also not accountable to anyone, and they cannot be replaced either. The common feature of the Soviet and Brussels bodies is that a significant part of their decisions and evaluations are not public. Just a recent example from Brussels.
Christopher Davis, a professor at the University of Oxford, recently revealed in an interview with Magyar Hírlap that Brussels prepared a secret study, the content of which was not shared with EU citizens. According to E, the sanctions decisions against Russia were made too quickly, and all of this was done under political pressure, and there was no prior economic impact study. The EU did not make any plan about the impact of the sanctions, it decided randomly.
In an ideological sense, the similarity between the Soviet and Brussels systems is even more striking, but perhaps in this case it is more appropriate to speak of identity. The goal of the Soviet Union was to create a new historical community, the “Soviet people”, the “socialist type of man”. Everyone was indoctrinated to forget their nationality, traditions and customs. The European Union does not want to see Frenchmen, Germans, Hungarians, Poles, etc. either. He wants a new historical community to be created, everyone to be European, suppress all national feelings and live in a multinational community.
So as thrilling as it is to see this MEP actually offer practical solutions to the problem, indicating that at least he understands the reality of the problem more than we are used to by those who have the pretence of representing our political interests, it feels more like WWE in the light of how the actual legislative body works. The wrestler who represents the average American enters the ring. The crowd cheers. Some folding chairs are broken, People either leave frustrated waiting for a rematch, or leave vindicated imagining that good has conquered evil. But like Brexit, the vote to leave the EU did not seem to have any practical effect in terms of restoring the national sovereignty of the United Kingdom whatsoever.
Mass migration increased and without checking I bet the Brits did not get their fishing or any other rights back from the EU.
We can hope that if he keeps this up, he manages to get into a position as did Geert Wilders with courageous and consistent messaging.
The details on this gentleman can be read at RAIR
There may be information at this link, although I think its just a transcript of this video below.
We all know there is insanity coming to the world, and especially the USA up until and for a while after the Nov. 5th elections. This is clearly part of it.
I guess when the cost benefit of telling the truth for moral people tips towards telling the truth, things are very, very bad. At least that would be the formula in a communist country, where truth is hate speech, and its cost is high,
Details on who this guy is can be read at RAIR
Here are two routes to the interview. Below from Jesse’s Rumble channel, and a link to Tucker Carlson Network that appears to work even if you don’t have a membership.
The Rumble version is only half of the interview. So if you are able to watch on the TCN that is your ticket to the whole interview.
Thank you Oz-Rita
There is a profound uptick in antisemitic attacks across the West, both by muslims, and their proxies on the left, and by weak organizations that cave to both. The larger threat to democracies of course, are where august organizations submit to demands or threats by muslim groups, and cancel participants, or even speakers or the even the keynote person at an event because they are Jewish, and may or may not have any connection to Israel. It was repugnant when we did it to Russians and it is no less repugnant now. RAIR Foundation wrote up some of those. This one in Australia is an excellent example of the state of democracy there. It also makes one wonder how much of this is the revenge of the Nazis. After all, Soros was a Nazi, Soros funded the vast migration of Muslims into Western lands. Soros worked with all those who effectively criminalized speaking the truth about Islam and its anti-civilizational, antisemitic core dogma and goals out loud.
The results of a vast Muslim migration anywhere are totally predictable. We can say that with some confidence, because this site has been predicting it since 2008 and it started doing so after reading sites like gatesofvienna.net which has been doing it much longer. Not to mention Bill Warner, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders and many many many more. How Geert Wilders has had to live since speaking clear and obvious provable truth about Islam would, back when reason was the foundation of our cultures, been enough to change immigration policies. After all, one needs only look at 1: if there are any minorities in Islamic lands, and where there are, 2: how they are treated, to know how this is going to go. Then there is history, but you have to get a book published before they Winston Smithed them all. Then there is what the jihadis say when they kill a bunch of people. Yet pointing these out are the left equivalent of blasphemy laws, “hate speech”. Like Islamic blasphemy laws, anything which is a threat to the leftist ideology or its enforcers is “hate speech” especially when it’s true. Exactly like blasphemy laws.
Here is a rather stellar example of exactly that:
A few more examples of the effect of mass migration of Muslims into the West from the last number of hours:
Switzerland: RAIR article here.
But it isn’t just we common folk that have to worry at this stage of the replacement:
British lawmakers fear for their safety after threats and abuse over Gaza
LONDON, Feb 28 (Reuters) – It was 10 minutes of shouted accusations of being a “genocide enabler” and having “blood on your hands” that made a British lawmaker fear for his safety over his decision to voice support for Israel in its war with Hamas.Almost touching noses with his accuser before walking away and warning he would call the police, the opposition Labour Party member said the incident in a town in his constituency was just the latest of several that made him change his behaviour.He now makes sure he sits near the door on public transport and limits meetings with the public.“It feels like it could just need one spark to flip from someone giving you tuppence (criticism) in the street to escalating to actual violence,” the lawmaker said.After the Oct. 7 Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza, more than 10 British politicians spoken to by Reuters said the abuse directed at them had become more intense. At least one cited this as a factor in deciding not to seek a new term in parliament in an election later this year.
A group of Muslims in Ottawa Canada has used the logo of the University of Ottawa to brand its propaganda:
For reasons that will become apparent as you watch, we will call this, The Red Dawn interview
This seems to belong in this post as well. Mark Levin on Chinese purchase of US politicians
The following documentary is by two brothers who followed the entire invasion of the US route from start to the US. They found UN stations all along the way giving support.
The UN is the COMINTERN. Like the Democrat Party at this point. This documentary is a must watch to understand how Biden along with the COMINTERN are attempting to destroy the nation state altogether, and create a world with no culture and no human rights. Once the US is gone, it is not easy to imagine how any people will manage to escape this fate.
The two brothers who made this video appeared on FOX last night in an interview. Once we find that clip we will add it to this post.