War on terror over. Now, war is against CO2

Now Greenpeace and Obama are both at war with actual elements. Good luck on that.

H/T to oxAO with thanks

From the Telegraph:

Barack Obama declares the ‘War on Terror’ is over

President Barack Obama has rejected George W. Bush’s doctrine that placed the “war on terror” at the centre of American foreign policy,

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Published: 10:00PM BST 27 May 2010

Barack Obama declares the 'War on Terror' is over

Barack Obama Photo: REUTERS

The US president has instead replaced it with a softer approach stressing “new partnerships” and multilateral diplomacy.

“Our long-term security will not come from our ability to instill fear in other peoples but through our capacity to speak to their hopes,” Mr Obama said in a message introducing a new national security strategy.

Continue Reading →

Guantanamo catch and release. Great results.

From STRATFOR:

Yemen: New AQAP Leader Named
May 27, 2010
A new Saudi leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula was introduced in a recently released video, Al Arabiya reported May 27. The leader was identified as Uthman Ahmad al-Ghamidi, 31, who was released from Guantanamo in June 2006. He spent more than four years there after he was arrested in Afghanistan.

Muslims are running out of drinks fast

Back in the 70s, I don’t know how it is now exactly, you could get Coke legally in Israel, but Pepsi was a back market thing. In Arab or Islamic nations the reverse was the case. The reason was, Muslim nations told companies that if they sold their products to Israel, they would not be able to sell them in Arab lands.

Coke, to its credit, said they would not be blackmailed and would sell to anyone who wished to buy it. Pepsi however, caved to the blackmail.

So please add that little story to the following video and enjoy a slice of irony with the stupidity already present:

Then of course we have the Starbucks issue:

If we can get them to boycott a few more drinks out there in the desert, maybe the problem will solve itself in a few days.

Democrats deny purple heart to Pvt. Long

Readers of Vlad I’m sure will be aware of the long standing plea we have made to award Pvt’s Long, who was killed in a terrorist attack at the recruiting center, as well as another man who was injured in the shooting, the Purple Heart award for being wounded in the line of duty.

Both men where in uniform. Both men where on duty. They where shot by an enemy of the United States and an avowed ally of the Islamist enemies of the USA.

Yet for political reasons, where denied the award.

Here is the video I did for these men when it happened, and below that, an excellent article by Diana West:

May 19

Written by: Diana West
Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:24 PM

The House Armed Services Committee today approved an amendment to the 2011 defense authorization bill that declares the 2009 shootings at the Little Rock recruiting station and at Ft. Hood to be acts of war. Or at least a lawyerly equivalent as acts “of an enemy of the United States.” This provision will enable the government to provide, as Marine Times reports, a “one-time payment equal to what those killed and wounded would have received if they were in a combat zone at the time of the shootings.”

But no Purple Hearts.

Killed by Muslims professing jihad, these battle dead will lie in their graves unrecognized by the US government whose uniform they wore.

Another disgrace.

The Marine Times story hints at some distasteful Democrat bargaining over this  — bargaining  I’d like to know more about.

The addition of the June 1 Little Rock shooting to the amendment was part of a compromise on a provision pushed by Republicans to make a point that the war on terror has hit home. As part of the compromise, the final bill also was narrowed so that casualties of the two shootings are not eligible for a Purple Heart or other combat-related benefits that Republicans had wanted in the bill.

How do they live with themselves?

Could a Texan fire a colt 45 as a form of ritual self defence?

If the British government has seen fit to allow Muslims to throw shoes as a legitimate form of ‘traditional ritual protest’ including but not limited to, ski boots and wooden clogs, then why could a Texan who might have had a shoe thrown at him shoot the mother fucker in traditional Texas form? I mean is it not a law and a culture within Texas as a sacred aspect of their individualism that they have the right of lethal self defence? My guess is, the Brits would tell them to stay home if they like their culture so much. One commenter from the originating site said something rather interesting as well…

“Peter Reid wrote:

“Shoes, and particularly the soles of shoes, are regarded as ritually unclean in the Islamic world.”
This is disturbing, because there is a saying in Islam: “A woman’s heaven lies beneath the soles of her husband’s feet.”

Sounds like downtrodden to me.”

In the meantime, from The Times Online:

Met allows Islamic protesters to throw shoes

Protesters throw shoes at a placard of Barack Obama in Jakarta,  Indonesia

Protesters throw shoes at a placard of Barack Obama in Jakarta, Indonesia

David Leppard

SCOTLAND YARD has bowed to Islamic sensitivities and accepted that Muslims are entitled to throw shoes in ritual protest — which could have the unintended consequence of politicians or the police being hit.

News of the concession by the Metropolitan police has come to light amid a series of trials of more than 70 mostly Muslim demonstrators who were charged with violent disorder after last year’s Gaza protests outside the Israeli embassy in London.

Aquib Salim, 21, an IT student at Queen Mary, London University, who was involved in a shoe-throwing incident, is almost certain to avoid a prison sentence as a result.

Chris Holt, Salim’s solicitor, said he was likely to get a suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty to a single charge of throwing a stick at police lines.

“The court accepted that the earlier shoe-throwing incident was simply a ritual form of protest and therefore not a criminal act of violence,” Holt said. Continue Reading →