Could a Texan fire a colt 45 as a form of ritual self defence?

Posted on by

If the British government has seen fit to allow Muslims to throw shoes as a legitimate form of ‘traditional ritual protest’ including but not limited to, ski boots and wooden clogs, then why could a Texan who might have had a shoe thrown at him shoot the mother fucker in traditional Texas form? I mean is it not a law and a culture within Texas as a sacred aspect of their individualism that they have the right of lethal self defence? My guess is, the Brits would tell them to stay home if they like their culture so much. One commenter from the originating site said something rather interesting as well…

“Peter Reid wrote:

“Shoes, and particularly the soles of shoes, are regarded as ritually unclean in the Islamic world.”
This is disturbing, because there is a saying in Islam: “A woman’s heaven lies beneath the soles of her husband’s feet.”

Sounds like downtrodden to me.”

In the meantime, from The Times Online:

Met allows Islamic protesters to throw shoes

Protesters throw shoes at a placard of Barack Obama in Jakarta, Indonesia

Protesters throw shoes at a placard of Barack Obama in Jakarta, Indonesia

David Leppard

SCOTLAND YARD has bowed to Islamic sensitivities and accepted that Muslims are entitled to throw shoes in ritual protest — which could have the unintended consequence of politicians or the police being hit.

News of the concession by the Metropolitan police has come to light amid a series of trials of more than 70 mostly Muslim demonstrators who were charged with violent disorder after last year’s Gaza protests outside the Israeli embassy in London.

Aquib Salim, 21, an IT student at Queen Mary, London University, who was involved in a shoe-throwing incident, is almost certain to avoid a prison sentence as a result.

Chris Holt, Salim’s solicitor, said he was likely to get a suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty to a single charge of throwing a stick at police lines.

“The court accepted that the earlier shoe-throwing incident was simply a ritual form of protest and therefore not a criminal act of violence,” Holt said.

Judge Denniss agreed that the act of shoe-throwing should not be considered in a charge of violent disorder against the student because it was “a symbolic” political gesture.

Shoes, and particularly the soles of shoes, are regarded as ritually unclean in the Islamic world. An Iraqi journalist became a folk hero for throwing a shoe at President George W Bush during a press conference in December 2008.

The president ducked, but Muntadhar al-Zaidi was jailed for three years and allegedly tortured by the Iraqis. He was released after nine months and his gesture inspired many imitators.

A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service admitted this weekend that the police advice to the Downing Street protesters was a factor in the case at Isleworth crown court, west London.

It has now emerged that the Metropolitan police first told protesters of its stance on shoe-throwing shortly after the attack on Bush.

The concession has already been taken up enthusiastically by Muslim demonstrators, who pelted Downing Street with shoes in protest at the Israeli bombing of Gaza last year.

Dozens of ski-boots and clogs were also hurled at the US consulate in Edinburgh in a related protest, in which three policemen sustained minor injuries.

Lindsey German, convenor of the Stop the War coalition, said: “After the incident in Baghdad we told the police that people would want to bring shoes to throw at Downing Street.

“They said that was okay and there was a facility allowed for people to bring old pairs of shoes. Afterwards they joked that they didn’t realise we were going to throw the shoes so hard.”

In January 2009, anti-war protesters advertised a demonstration outside Downing Street by posting a photograph of a pair of old shoes under the words: “Bring your old shoes to throw at useless Gordo.”

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

One Reply to “Could a Texan fire a colt 45 as a form of ritual self defence?”

  1. Muslims all over the world see terrorist activity as a legitimate form of “ritual self-defence”, yet the mainstream media doesn’t want to call it that. Instead, they say it is the work of “radical” or “extremist” elements in Islam.

    I wish that they would see this shoe throwing thing as a political statement and not a “religious” one, for it isn’t religious at all. Its the equivalent of insulting a person you disagree with, for no other reason than you disagree with them.

    Muslims throw shoes out of frustration that they can’t talk rationally about politics or religion, since they haven’t the education to do so. Its a core reason why Islam has survived this long; it keeps people ignorant and irrational so that the leaders can better control their followers.