War on terror over. Now, war is against CO2

Now Greenpeace and Obama are both at war with actual elements. Good luck on that.

H/T to oxAO with thanks

From the Telegraph:

Barack Obama declares the ‘War on Terror’ is over

President Barack Obama has rejected George W. Bush’s doctrine that placed the “war on terror” at the centre of American foreign policy,

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Published: 10:00PM BST 27 May 2010

Barack Obama declares the 'War on Terror' is over

Barack Obama Photo: REUTERS

The US president has instead replaced it with a softer approach stressing “new partnerships” and multilateral diplomacy.

“Our long-term security will not come from our ability to instill fear in other peoples but through our capacity to speak to their hopes,” Mr Obama said in a message introducing a new national security strategy.

In the 52-page document, drawn up after 16 months of deliberations, Mr Obama outlines a much broader set of priorities and methods than Mr Bush’s tightly-focused determination to eradicate Islamism by any means possible and alone if necessary.

“We will always seek to delegitimise the use of terrorism and to isolate those who carry it out,” it states. “Yet this is not a global war against a tactic – terrorism – or a religion – Islam.

“We are at war with a specific network, al-Qaeda, and its terrorist affiliates who support efforts to attack the United States, our allies, and partners.”

Mr Obama distances himself from Mr Bush’s concept of pre-emptive wars to prevent emerging threats, instead citing the national security implications of global economic crises and climate change.

American global leadership, the document argues, depends on a strong economy and a determination to progress in the areas of “education, clean energy, science and technology, and a reduced federal deficit”.

It highlights home-grown terrorists who become “radicalised” on American soil. “Our best defences against this threat are well informed and equipped families, local communities, and institutions.

“The Federal Government will invest in intelligence to understand this threat and expand community engagement and development programs to empower local communities.”

It does note that for more than a decade, the United States has been involved in a struggle against a “far-reaching network of violence and hatred”. Military superiority will remain “a cornerstone of our national defence and an anchor of global security”.

But also important will be “new partnerships with emerging centres of influence” and a “push for institutions that are more capable of responding to the challenges of our times”. American innovation is “a leading source of American power”.

The document presents the Obama administration as realist in nature, an implicit rebuke to the neoconservatives who hoped to reorder the world based on American values. “To succeed, we must face the world as it is,” it states.

There should be tough engagement “without illusion” with foes like Iran and North Korea but isolation would be the result of their continued intransigence. In his last national security strategy in 2006, Mr Bush declared that “the war on terror is not over”.

In a preview of the document, John Brennan, Mr Obama’s senior counter-terrorism adviser, said that there was a “new phase” in al-Qaeda tactics in which terrorists who did not fit the “traditional profile” would carry out attacks.

These included Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian who attempted to explode an underpants bombs on a Detroit-bound plane on Christmas Day, and Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani American accused of leaving a car bomb in New York’s in Times Square this month.

“As our enemy adapts and evolves their tactics, so must we constantly adapt and evolve ours, not in a mad rush driven by fear, but in a thoughtful and reasoned way that enhances our security and further delegitimises the actions of our enemy,” Mr Brennan said.

It was wrong, he added, to “describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists” because that would “play into the false perception” that al-Qaeda and its allies were “religious leaders and defending a holy cause, when in fact, they are nothing more than murderers”.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “War on terror over. Now, war is against CO2”

  1. “Our long-term security will not come from our ability to instill fear in other peoples but through our capacity to speak to their hopes,”

    That’s so damn wrong on so many damn levels… First of all, what is the number one rule in understanding how to fight mahoundian inbred bedouin savages, as Thomas Jefferson did when he had the living crap bombarded out of the mahoundian Barbary Pirates?

    The coward and the cripple are doomed to contempt and death. The respect of his neighbor is in proportion to the fear with which he inspires him.

    Secondly, how does one speak to mahoundian hopes, when we know very well that what they want is for the whole world to be ruled by sharia, and to be on its knees before mahound’s imaginary alter-ego allah? And that they want nothing more than to see places like NYC, Zurich, Copenhagen, Paris, Toronto, San Francisco, Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore and you name it turned into such beacons of scientific progress, prosperity, literacy, economic and intellectual development, human rights (especially women’s and gay rights), quality of life and artistic freedom such as Mecca, Cairo, Tripoli, Damascus, Sanaa, Khartoum, Karachi and Mogadishu?

  2. ““We will always seek to delegitimise the use of terrorism and to isolate those who carry it out”

    I don’t know about you guys but this statement says Obama is questioning the legitimacy of the Jihad.

    This year will be the first time since the US had its first memorial day during the civil war has a US president not honored our troops.

    I am telling you this guy is not right in the head.

    Notice this came out the same day another report came out stating attacks are up.

  3. The world has seen the words “multilateral diplomacy” used before, just prior to WWI.

    Back then, the major European powers created such a massive and entangled set of alliances that the merest shove (or bullets, actually) plunged Europe into 4 years of hell.

    The only constant in the new scheme of things isn’t the western powers, but the Muslim states who are showing that they are of one mond when it comes to the establishment of a universal caliphate.

    Now Obama is paving the way for them to succeed.

  4. How do you know he is not going to honour the troops in the traditional way? Is there a link? Has he issued a statement on this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.