Category Archives: forcing sharia

On Saturday night a young couple were attacked by up to five people of alien ethnic origin in Silkeborg (Denmark).

Posted on by

An original translation by Tania Groth

From this Danish Website:

In connection with the incident, Mid- and West Jutland police are searching for the offender, whom they describe as a man about 175 cm tall, of standard build, of an ethnic origin other than Danish, and wearing dark clothing. They are also looking for two to four other persons who participated in the attack.

The attack took place on March 12th 6:07 in Nygade in Silkeborg at Eiffel Pizzeria, where the 24-year-old and her male acquaintance sat on a staircase eating pizza.

The perpetrator took one of her pieces of pizza and threw it on the ground. This turned into a scuffle, and soon afterwards a group of men, friends of the perpetrator, arrived at the scene and started kicking and punching her male acquaintance.

Midtjyllands Avis writes that the young couple were asked if there was pork on their pizza, to which they answered yes. It was apparently this that triggered the brawl.

“Suddenly a young man of different ethnic origin rushed out and struck the young girl gratuitously on the head and she subsequently lost her hearing in one ear. At the moment we do not know whether she has permanent hearing loss! He then takes a stranglehold on her and shouts that she sure as hell should not eat pork on her pizza!” Writes the mother of the young man in a post on Facebook. The newspaper has seen the post.

To BT Police Commissioner Bent Riber Nielsen has confirmed that the perpetrator enquired about the contents of the pizza. The Police Commissioner has no further comments to add.

He hopes that the above video can help to identify the as yet unidentified men.

Two expert opinions on Canadian move to blasphemy laws

Posted on by

1, Ezra Levant: Article here

Point de Bascule:

Point de Bascule is a site which has been doing herculean work with nothing for years on the impact of Islam and Islamic penetration, infiltration and subversion of Canadian agencies of state.

#Motion103 – Canadian government delegation met with Islamist lobby NCCM / CAIR-CAN, Islamic Relief and Haroun Bouazzi

On February 8, Liberal MP Iqra Khalid “reconnected” with Islamist lobby NCCM / CAIR-CAN, Montreal-based AMAL-Québec co-president Haroun Bouazzi and Islamic Relief Executive Manager Abdelbasset Benaissa for a discussion about Motion 103. She was accompanied by fellow MPs Salma Zahid and Frank Baylis for the occasion. Motion 103 aims at “develop[ing] a whole-of-government approach” to target so-called Islamophobia.

Officially, Motion 103 is Iqra Khalid’s private member motion. However, very early on Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly was mandated to express the federal government’s “strong and clear support” to Iqra Khalid’s motion. As National Post columnist Barbara Kay pointed out, it is not clear “whether it was MP Iqra Khalid […] or the Prime Minister’s Office” who crafted the motion. MP Khalid refuses media interviews and won’t answer this question and others.

Please click through for the rest.

 

Guest essay on capital punishment for littering in England

Posted on by

The following is a comment left by Perfect Child under this multi item post where I ended it with a few thoughts about the man who died in prison while serving a 1 year sentence for what in reality should be considered littering.

Eeyore

“A MAN put behind bars for a racist attack on a mosque earlier this year has died in prison.”

Let that sink in. The mosque was attacked for racial purposes.

This is what YASMIN JEFFERY of the Sun newspaper reported.

As we are very familiar with Islamists’ attacking and destroying religious property, so YASMIN is equating this as exactly the same.

What actually happened?

“The gang left rashers of bacon on the door handles of the mosque, and put bacon sandwiches on the doorstep.”
“CCTV footage of the racially motivated attack depicted two men standing by a St George flag with “no mosques” written on it.”

This was incredibly restrained.  There was no property damage.  Two bacon sandwiches lay on the floor. Bacon smeared on handles.  A teeshirt sentiment wanting “no mosques.”

Where was the racism?  Their target was the ridiculously dangerous propagation of Islam.  A Femen sacrilege-statement, and not a Martin Luther Reformation notice.

The same intent as George and Mildred’s Christ Art.Apart from trespass, a minor clean up and hurt feelings that may be claimed for, nothing happened.  In the morning, the Imam would be outraged, filled with the fear of retribution for the Jihad attacks in Berlin and Paris and demand police protection.

This was a political protest.  The humor lost on those who cast the spirit of pigs back into their own heads.

Which means they are now (minus 1) British political prisoners.

Article above taken from a comment by Perfect Child.

Dutch school children forced to do Islamic ritual

Posted on by

There have been photos of this disgusting abuse of school authority over children circulating in the past. So I don’t know for sure if this is from the same event or a different and ongoing problem. But this is the first time I have seen this particular video.

Where are the Dutch school children forced to take communion? Bar Mitzvah? Meditate to Chen Rezig. I didn’t think so.

H/T Xanthippa

Indonesia succumbs to islamic mob rule

Posted on by

This is an event, the importance of which, will be missed by nearly everybody.

Just a week or so ago, massive mobs demanded that a Christian, more importantly, a non-muslim, governor who is up for reelection in Indonesia, be tried/jailed for blasphemy.

His actual “crime” such as it isn’t, was that he challenged his muslim opponent who claimed that the koran says that muslims may not be ruled by a non-muslim.

The Christian governor disagreed with that interpretation.

He in effect, was trying to say that the literal interpretation of koran should not apply, or be the only consideration when choosing a political leader.

This was determined to be blasphemy by the howling mob.

He was subsequently arrested and is now on trial for this, arguably most victimless crime possible.

The crowds are back, this time demanding a foregone conclusion. Jail. And of course we all know it won’t end there. Assassination attempts will likely take place on him, and his lawyers and any public supporters of his, like it does in Pakistan.

And if it doesn’t. its only a matter of time till it does.

But this is an important event for a few reasons.

The obvious one. That Indonesia is rapidly sliding into a muslim theocracy.

The slightly less obvious one, that we are witnessing a process that can and will take place all over the world if we do not take very very serious measures to stop it.

London England:

Please listen carefully to what the speakers are saying. As some are hard to make out, Breitbart has done us the courtesy of transcribing some of it.

Indonesia was not always a muslim country. And now it is be much more sharia compliant than it was a few years ago. And a few years from now it will be much more sharia compliant than it is now.

Hijra means two things. To make a journey to a place that is not islamic to make it islamic, but it also means the journey of making a place more islamic than it currently is.

As an aside, that is one of the only two clear ways a muslim can make it into the odd, lewd, Islamic concept of an afterlife, with its whores who are virgins and its rivers of wine.

The other reason to be concerned, is that a howling mob can force events to take place in the world of government and courts, based on a blasphemy accusation by a howling mob of people determined to create a despotic state. This is not news and utterly obvious. We see it constantly from Muslims.

But what is less obvious is that it is not for insulting Mohammad or his sock puppet allah.

It is for challenging just one of the ideas in the koran.

This is a demand to make every idea in that insane little book inviolable.

And at the expense of the real meaning of that word.

This is not a slippery slope, this is a well greased slide at a waterpark.

Of course the immediate implication of a guilty verdict will be that no non-muslim can possibly run for office anywhere that the population of muslims is high enough to prevent it, not by voting, although that would be bad enough, but by forming a rabid mob.

Given that Germany now has the highest number of accepted “refugees” in the world, higher than all other countries in THE WORLD COMBINED, one gets a sense of where it will happen first in the Western classical democracies.

(Video on that issue may be available in the next day or so)

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

 

 

Student refuses mosque visit: 300 Euro penalty

Posted on by

A original translation by Nash Montana with much thanks!

From this German website: OE24

Parents are lodging an appeal. But still a 300 Euro penalty is looming and a forced visit to a mosque

According to the syllabus-topic “The Orient – power factor water and crude oil”, a school class in the German Rendsburg was scheduled to visit a mosquee. But one 13 year old student did not want to participate, as the online portal “mmnews.de” reports. The parents were seeking dialogue with the school after the announcement of the field trip destination.

Since they aren’t members of any denomination or faith community, they were of the opinion that no one can be forced to step inside a religious facility. “Why should we send our child to people who generally despise and condemn unbelievers”, the parents asked the school.

300 Euro penalty and forced visit

The German Constitutional law would agree, but the responsible parties at the school see it differently. The school headmistress filed a complaint with the police and the county school inspector decreed a penalty charge notice, against the mother as well as against the father of the student. Reason: The child did not attend the “information event” at the mosque.

Now the parents look like “dangerous felons”, they say. There never was a hearing. The penalty charge notice never considered any exculpatory circumstances. Therefore the parents “didn’t in a satisfying manner care, for their child’s school attendance”.

Now a 300 Euro penalty charge looms and a forced visit to the mosque. The parents have filed an appeal. Therefore this case will be heard in district court soon.

UK: A stunning case of kidnapping of young girls, sexual slavery and degradation, Muslim honour rapes daughter

Posted on by

Anyone uncertain as to the veracity of the claims in this video only need read a few chapters of the earth scortchingly important book, “Easy Meat” and know that even if these people made up the whol story, it is definitly true for thousands of other British white non-Muslim girls.

For an example of Islam and sex as a weapon today, check out this story from Norway.

Additional links to that same story from Norwegian media:

AltMedia Document.no

Local MSM in Fredrikstad

National MSM Aftenposten

Danish MSM Berlingske (BT) 

 

Machteld Zee: “Islamization is Planned”

Posted on by

An original translation by Dr. VanHelsing

With a forward by Gates of Vienna

From this Dutch language website:

 

A young Dutch political scientist is causing consternation among the bien-pensants of the multicultural Left in the Netherlands with her analyses of Islamization. Her impeccable liberal background and credentials make it more difficult for the establishment to discredit her.

Dr. Van Helsing has translated an interview with this iconoclastic young woman. He includes this introductory note:

Machteld Zee Ph.D. is a Dutch scholar who investigated sharia courts in the UK for her Ph.D. thesis. This interview was published in the Algemeen Dagblad, a nationwide Dutch newspaper, on October 4, 2016.

The interview is relevant for several reasons:

  • Very few non-Muslims ever have gained access to the world of sharia courts in the UK. She has.
  • The University of Leiden is fairly highbrow in the Netherlands, because it is not only one of the oldest universities. but also because the heir to the Dutch throne traditionally studies at this university (for example, our former Queens Juliana and Beatrix did, just like our current head of state King Willem-Alexander). The reputation of this university gives authority to her voice.
  • She has become a target of attacks by leftist apologists for radical Islam since she published her thesis. She could do with some positive publicity. Similarly, Islam-sceptics could benefit from her work.

The translated interview:

“Islamization is Planned”

Investigating Sharia

The Islamization of Europe follows a strategy, according to Machteld Zee in her book Holy Identities, which was published today. ‘Once you have knowledge of it, you understand what is going on.’

‘I discovered a comprehensive system of law that contradicts our secular laws.’

Investigating sharia courts

Machteld Zee (32), a Dutch political scientist from the University of Leiden, studied sharia courts in the UK and wrote her Ph.D. thesis on it in 2015.

She was one of the few outsiders who gained access to the sessions of these Islamic courts. 95% of the cases before these courts are divorce cases. Her investigations resulted in a pamphlet, Holy Identities.

‘If you compare the Netherlands in the 1980s with today,’ says the political scientist and law school graduate Machteld Zee, ‘you will see an increased influence of Islam everywhere. Saudi Arabia and other countries flooded the world with thousands of imams, Islamic text books, mosques and tons of money.’

Machteld Zee needed barely 150 pages to describe the background of Islamic fundamentalism, which is gaining ground in Western countries. Her book Holy Identities: On the Road to a Sharia State is an analysis of the problems of the multicultural society.

You say that conservative Muslims want to convince their fellow Muslims to embrace sharia, the religious law of Islam. These fundamentalists are being helped by ‘useful non-believers’, non-Islamic intellectuals, politicians and opinion leaders who don’t want to offend Muslims.

‘Yes, leading multiculturalists actually believe that Muslims should be shielded from criticism because it would inflict psychological damage on them. Although many Muslims consider this an idiotic point of view, others use it to call those who criticize Islam ‘Islamophobes’ and ‘racists’.

You described yourself as left-leaning liberal when you started your investigation on sharia courts in the UK. Now you warn against a lack of knowledge of and a lack of resistance against the advancing radical Islam.

‘I discovered a comprehensive system of law — far more systematic then I had expected — that contradicts our secular laws. Many Muslim women are locked into a religious marriage because their community thinks a divorce according secular law is insufficient. In these communities — Muslim communities — sharia law trumps secular law when it comes to marriage. Women have to ask a sharia judge or an imam to dissolve their marriage, for example when the husband physically abuses her. Even Dutch Muslim women travel to the UK to appear before sharia courts. It is a parallel society. I object to it because these practices go against women’s rights.’

You have analyzed the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is a political and religious movement that aims for world domination, and is supported by lots of money from fundamentalist circles. The sharia courts are part of this project, you wrote.

‘That is why it is so important that we know what is going on. Authors that I studied for my investigation were generally benevolent towards sharia courts. It turned out, however, that none of them ever attended a session of such a court. They don’t know what is going on in these courts. Now they ask me to tell all about it. Women are advised by these courts to accept polygamy and to not file criminal complaints in case of domestic violence. Physically abusive fathers are given custody of their children. I have the impression that the tide of the public debate is turning now that these facts are becoming public. I hardly hear anyone pleading in favour of sharia courts anymore.’

In your book you call out the politically correct elites, who tries to cover up abuse within Islam and tries to downplay the threat of Islamic fundamentalism.

‘In the first place, I think I am reporting facts. Where I notice that influential Western intellectuals tend to discourage critics of Islam and help fundamentalists to isolate and ‘Islamize’ Muslim communities, that is a matter of fact. My book is a compact discourse that aims to bring its readers up to date on fundamentalist Islam.’

How do you see the future?

‘We will have to act more defensively and resist Islamization. We should not yield to demands that images of scantily dressed women in public have to be covered up, for example. Just say no. Citizens should not leave everything to the government. They can defend our beliefs and values themselves, too. Why does a college in The Hague decides to abandon the Christmas tree pre-emptively? Why is alcohol banned in places where Muslims show up? There is no need for that. We are doing it to ourselves.’

Do you fear criticism? Undoubtedly, you will be labeled as a right-winger.

‘I don’t experience that when I speak in public. Even a ‘leftist’ audience responds positively to my story. Right-wing? Come on, equal rights for women and resistance against representatives of a religion who make threats of violence — let’s call that common sense.’

Monday morning side event at the OSCE in Warsaw. Criminalize Islamophobia, but don’t define it

Posted on by

We posted a video of Stephen Coughlin the other day here at Vlad, doing an intervention at the OSCE event in Warsaw last weekend, where he referred to another event which took place on Monday morning at a side event.

The clip of Maj. Coughlin at the OSCE putting on record the danger of the demand to criminalize “Islamophobia” without even defining it is here again for those that missed it:

And here as well:

Below, the event to which Maj. Coughlin was referring:

Austria: Teacher called Mohammed a child molester: prosecutor investigates!

Posted on by

Original translation by Egri Nok with much thanks!

From Vol.At

Bregenz — A middle school teacher allegedly referred to Mohammed as child molester in front of her pupils. The prosecution was informed; the provincial education department now awaits the investigation.

A Bregenzer teacher is said to have described the founder of Islam as a child molester in front of her students. “Yes, there is this allegation against a teacher,” the provincial educational counsellor Bernadette Mennel confirms the corresponding complaint. The education department had immediately forwarded the case to the prosecutor.

They check whether the allegations are true. Due to the ongoing investigation, no further information on the case is currently available through the state school board. If the allegations were true, the teacher would have to face consequences. “Such statements are unacceptable,” stressed Mennel to VOL.AT. However, they would await the outcome of the prosecution, before making decisions.

The accusation that Muhammad was a child molester is not new. It refers to Mohammed’s third wife Aisha bint Abu Bakr.

She was betrothed to Mohammed at the age of six years, and according to tradition at nine years the marriage was consummated.

In the Middle Ages, neither in the East nor in Europe the marriage of underage women for political purposes was unusual. Nowadays, child marriage is illegal in almost all countries of the world, but is still practiced, especially among poorer families in the Arab world, and India. In 2009, because of comparable statements, FPÖ Member of Parliament Susanne Winter was convicted of incitement of the people (Volksverhetzung).

Translator’s notes:

1. I am not aware that child marriages were “not unusual” in medieval Europe, as the article claims.
2. Vorarlberg Online or VOL.AT is a tiny Austrian regional news portal, probably more coverage to follow in the coming days.
3. There are rumours there could be more behind this case than meets the eye, so best to wait for more information.

Eeyore’s notes:

What difference does it make that child marriages may or may not have been normal in the middle ages. So was the black death and I don’t see anyone raising fleas today.