Category Archives: Stephen Coughlin

2015: OSCE meeting where the future was foretold – Truth becomes hate speech

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Please take your time and watch this one with focus. This is not a very long video. But like a lot of the old material we repost here from time to time, it has layers of extra meaning and value in hindsight.

First, the blunt question is asked by Henrik Clausen: “Can truth ever constitute hate speech?”

There is a lot of analysis in here by Stephen Coughlin. The whole video is only 19 minutes. But it is a major foreshadowing of the state of freedom of speech in the West today, and identifies some of the actors who crushed it, not the least of which appears to be certain Russian agencies.

Carney, China, Coal power and intersectional lines of attack on all aspects of Western identity

Posted on by

1. The point has been made here before that it seems quite likely that Trudeau was the idiot boy-wonder behind policies that were actually moved into place by a COMINTERN cabal quasi-behind the scenes. I say quasi because the WEF has openly bragged about its penetration of the Canadian Cabinet.

YouTube took it down. Here it is again.

Now, the COMINTERN with some sleazy maneuvers has managed to place a sophisticated actor into the role of Canadian PM. One Mark Carney. Think of it like the same process as the US used, when they placed a senile and highly corrupt and corruptible man in the White House while running it from behind in the person of Brack Obama, but in this case, the useful idiot was out front for 9 years using Hanlon’s Razor as his defence for highly sophisticated intersectional attacks on every one of our liberties and aspects of our identities as Canadians and as citizens of a Western republic/democracy, and now the main agent has stepped into place.

2. Mark Carney appears to have a lot of financial interests in US coal mines but is failing to cover miners with Black Lung.

3. Again, I have heard with my own ears as have others I know, Carney saying he actually wants NEGATIVE net zero. This is code for oppression, as it’s simply impossible to do that. Its outside of the realm of any kind of physics or chemistry.

Peterson gets this pretty much totally correct.

4. This one I can’t help but like as this guy has just taken the National Post article we have posted about 25 times in the past couple of years, and condensed out the most stunning and important parts in a Twitter video.

Here is the article again. Please send the link to everyone you know who can vote in Canada or knows someone who can vote in Canada, so long as we are pretending voting makes a difference.

5. And at last, a NEW National Post article on Carney’s climate policy.

For those that don’t get this, the Climate thing is an intersectional attack against Western and only Western industry and the middle class. For an explanation of that, see the Stephen Coughlin video below.

Terry Newman: Mark Carney’s climate obsessions will put Trudeau to shame

Don’t trust his pledge to turn Canada into an energy superpower

For all of Carney’s supposed superior knowledge of the world and markets, the art of provincial negotiations and incentives for private investment in natural resources appears to have already escaped his grasp. There’s evidence to suggest this is because, at heart, Carney is likely to be a fully fledged ESG prime minister (ESG being short for environmental, social, and governance principles being imposed on business).

In his speech after winning the Liberal leadership, Carney said he had a plan: “A plan, a plan, a plan … that makes us an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy … a plan that creates one Canadian economy, not 13, because in Canada, we are stronger when we are united.”

Unfortunately, everything Carney’s said and done up until this point suggests not only that he’d fail to unite Canadian provinces to create this energy super-economy, but that’s he’s not actually interested in doing so in the first place.

The Liberal party may have a new face, but Carney’s insistence on keeping an emissions cap and industrial carbon tax in place — both products of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government — doesn’t invoke much confidence in his energy superpower plan.

We view articles like the above as colour commentary. Like listening to someone describe the action on the field at a sporting event with maybe some light background on his views of the players or the refs but little to no actual information about the nature of the game at the strategic level.

The strategic level looks like this:

Politicians and other communist revolutionary actors create fictional narratives which have as their focus, a component of Western civilization and the identity of all who live in it which must be destroyed. These are called “Intersectional lines of attack”. The Global Warming thing is so obviously an attack on Western industry it should feel embarrassing to explain it out loud. But most still buy into it, even though China is not just immune from criticism for not living up to the various low carbon policies, but is actively building 5000 coal powered power production facilities a year, and they buy the coal from people like Mark Carney. Then there is the actual science which doesn’t support the Global warming from man-made CO2 claims whatsoever. Then there are the people who claim CO2 from engine exhaust is an existential threat to the entire planet, then take separate jumbo jets from Washington to LA for an afternoon. Michelle to go shopping, and Barack for a meeting. Then take separate jets to go home. Of course, Trudeau and Carney are no different.

If it was an existential threat you would see some evidence of it in their behaviour. The way they would say, jump out of the way of an oncoming truck. That is how you know they believe the truck is real, and it could really hurt them. Because they jump out of the way. (take any veiled reference you want to the Freedom Convoy and it’s threat to Trudeau’s power during covid you want, although I didn’t pick that example for that reason)

Below is a recentish interview with Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin on the intersectional lines of attack which is used to crush so many aspects of our identity. Think “Trans-affirming care” for the state’s ‘right’ to convince a child it is somehow in the wrong body, and needs to be surgically and chemically sterilized and mutilated to feel comfortable with itself. Ok then. Once you start to see it, examples are numerous and obvious.

Dutch Maj. General takes the position that we live in an imposed pseudo-reality created by the state and enforced by the media

Posted on by

Regulars of this site may recognize the concepts in this video and the companion RAIR article as being the message of Maj, (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin for many years now. Even so, it is amazing to see this understanding coming from someone as deep in the military establishment as this Maj. General in the Dutch army.

Stephen Coughlin thread on the tactical use of “Islamophobia” now of growing importance with UK new laws

Posted on by

Six part Stephen Coughlin thread on X on the critically important use of the term, “Islamophobia” as a catch all to censor all non-revolutionary speech.

Here is Tweet 1/6 but click through for the whole thread.

I decided to reproduce the entire thread here because it is very good and people should see it as its importance to Western Civ has gone up several notches since various Western countries are now implementing Sharia law, even if they disguise it in Marxist language. But Please do click through if you have an X account and re tweet it so that as many as possible can read this thread.

Remember, Hate-speech is just the Marxist equivalent of Islamic Blasphemy laws, but with MUCH wider applications, and not nearly as specific.

Full text of Tweet 1:

1) Islamophobia has no definition – by design. When a term is manufactured to impose one’s will on others that lacks definition, it is a warning that it can mean anything or nothing at all. Stated differently, it means whatever the state wants it to mean.

Hence, the failure to define is a FEATURE, not a FLAW in the drafting

Islamophobia is designed to be interactively interoperable with the intersectional Marxist term “Racism.” Islamophobia is designed to impose Islamic speech laws against non-Muslims in non-Muslim lands.

Check out “Warning on Racism” (word Search “Blair” – and related) –

Tweet 2:

2) At an OSCE Meeting in Warsaw, Poland, in 2013,(below), I directly intervened to get the status on Islamophobia straight from the official horses’ mouths that Islamophobia lacks a definition along lines developed by the OIC and UK-based (the still EU) Marxists (Runnymede Institute) for implementation through international lines.

The Marxist left and the IM have used international forums to introduce, socialize, normalize and then enforce their vocabulary along extra-legal lines while sounding “rule-of-law-ish.” Today, the international language of diplomacy is Marxist in design and intent.

Towards the end, that’s yours truly securing the definition and meaning of Islamophobia from official OIC releases, drafters, and leaders for use in OSCE functions. There is no speculation about Islamophobia – nor its hostile intent.

National leaders who fail to account for this, and even use the term against fellow American citizens, impose Islamic speech laws on U.S. (and N. American, and EU) on American citizens inside the United States – whether they know it or not.

Check it out, this is how the subversion sausage is made (The Runnymede Institute is the Marxist entity that manufactured the term “Islamophobia” in its current use):

 

Tweet 3:

Tweet 3)

In May 2015 in Vienna, Austria, at an official opening forum of the OSCE, we got the official panel to expressly state that saying something known and stipulated to be true can constitute “hate speech.” Hate speech is the Marxist term that Islamophobia is designed to be fully interactive and interoperational with at international, national, and local levels. (It drives the “Palestinian” branded street action on American campuses and streets today).

To be clear, when the UK PM commits to imposing Islamophobia mandates on UK citizens inside the UK, they are engaged in a deliberate effort to supersede UK law in favor of facially neutrally stated Islamic law on slander against those same UK citizens. And it’s a civil rights catastrophe.

KNOW WHAT YOU SEE:

Tweet 4.

It’s a “Dialogue and Praxis” thing. Impose the language and use it, you will become it. Adopt the language of Marxism; YOU WILL EXECUTE the Marxist agenda even when you erroneously believe you’re using it to contest it. The opportunity cost of using the Marxist terms developed to implement Marxist mass lines is that you’re not using your language, and you’re not using the language of freedom. It’s just that simple. (Sorry, but the video is down, but the transcript is still posted)

Tweet 5.

 This is what Islamophobia implements.

The Islamic Law that Islamophobia executes through facially neutral language is that of Islamic notions of slander – which ARE NOT Western notions of the same.

As I explained this back in 2012 when, having just been purged from DOD (again), I put together a makeshift office in my basement. The following was cut in those circumstances, here, to explain Islamic slander laws. (Yes, not looking my best but WT . . .)

 

Tweet 6.

 BTW, Islamophobia laws (“Defamation of Religions” [where only one religion can be defamed]) is what al-Issa is currently socializing to great effect on all those friendly speaking tours, including with the Marxist head of the UN and religious leaders who ought to know better.

Al-Issah runs the Wahhabi World Muslim League (WML)
that is under the direct control of Saudi Arabia and operates in conjunction with KSA policy and OIC guidance.

When interfaith, the Left, and militantly gullible say “building bridges,” force yourself to draw a solid (not a dotted) line to Qutb’s controlling meaning of that phrase.

2012 interview with Stephen Coughlin on Islam, and the push for world wide sharia

Posted on by

We’ve all been at this for a while. And one way to determine the value of things said and models drawn is to see how they age.

This interview with Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin was done in 2012. Let us know what you think in the comments, given what we see around us in the intervening 13 years.

New: Stephen Coughlin on intersectional lines of attack and the Maoist insurgency model

Posted on by

This is maybe the clearest explanation of the phenomenon destroying the West across multiple lines of attack yet by Maj. Coughlin. There is a summary of the interview at RAIR. But watch the interview. It is well worth the time.

We have charted major increases in violence and kinetic tactics during communist-Islamic anti Western demonstrations, usually under the rubric of “Anti-Israel” or “pro-Palestine” events.

For the past year however, the mask slips now and again, and we hear coded and sometimes open calls for the destruction of the Nation state. Sometimes, the states with the most famously individual rights and individualist constitutions, such as The United States, Canada and the formerly great Britain are named for destruction.. For example in the video below, there is no hidden language. The intention is now overt.

It is also evident that the State never use even a fraction of the force the authorities have available to it, or has used in many cases, even against peaceful pro-rule of law, and pro-patriotic protests such as Ottawa’s Freedom Convoy in 2022, and peaceful pro-AfD demonstrations in Germany among others.

So we went to Stephen Coughlin, retired US Military Intelligence officer and lawyer to ask for his perspective on the the nature of these protests, understanding their language and motives, and what we can do to deal with the threat effectively.

The following interview is a little under 90 minutes long. And you will not come out the other side unchanged. Understanding the roots of these movements from Karl Marx back to Hegel and ultimately to the classical philosophers of ancient Greece shines a light on the various devices used to trap us into enemy territory and even becoming unwitting accomplices in our own destruction is critical for effective defence.

Interesting security brief by Stephen Coughlin

Posted on by

This is a fairly straight forward brief by Maj. Coughlin. It gets fascinating at over the half way point when he talks about sorcery and pharmacology. Read the Tweet I put after this video in the context of his explanation of mind control and sorcery.

This appears to be an impromptu interview with Stephen after his brief

 

Preparing yourself to be a good enemy via OPSEC to those waging political Warfare against us: Know what you mean by what you say

Posted on by

A few items suggesting the dialectical revolutionary nature of feminism from roots to trans

Posted on by

1. Has Feminism been a dialectical effort from its inception? With Fourth Wave Feminism (dialectical revolutions never stand still but are always working to destroy the previous order) being the current ‘Trans-movement’?

2. Stephen Coughlin’s Marxism’s War on women

3. Let’s see. The UK Labour party is 100% a product of The Fabian Society. The Fabian Society is a communist project to destroy the UK and remake it as a communist polity through subversion as opposed to violent revolution. Hence the logo, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Labour just ‘won’ an election and their policies and views are starting to be made known and manifested.

Stephen Coughlin: A detailed explanation of leftist strategy to destroy America, and every aspect of our identities

Posted on by

The following is a wild ride with Maj. (Ret) Stephen Coughlin, Sam Dubé and I did a 3 hour and change session with the retired US military intel analyst on the strategy and the history of the strategy which is the overarching method-of-thought of the enemies of civilization. Having more or less focus-grouped this session, I can say with some confidence that it has been watched all the way through and understood by the people who have seen it so far. Also they have expressed a greater understanding of the events taking place today for having seen this session.

All of the jargon which Stephen often uses in his shorter briefs is well explained and examples are drawn by Stephen and the other participants from recent and current events as a way of showing the application of the strategies used against us, that Stephen details.

In the following brief and Q&A with retired Military Intel officer, Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin, Vlad Tepes and Dr. Sam Dubé go through the detailed analysis of the leftist strategy which defines the tactics they use to not just destroy the West, but manage to get most of us to assist them in destroying the west as unwitting Controlled Opposition.

The following three hours is a riveting conversation and brief with Maj. Coughlin, discusisng how so many of our modern concepts have been cons to maneauver us away from real science and understanding to a place of uncertainty, where reality itself can be “liquified” by the left such that we have to accept whatever narratives they throw at us.

Where real science is a crime, and ‘sceintism’, the kind of language we saw during the Covid pandemic, not to mention global warming and ‘gender theory’ become compulsory, and deviance from these narratives can result in the state use of force against all who resist.

Personally i have been through this three times and working through it again to make a TOC in order to find specific points more quickly in the future. I’ll post what I have so far, but only up to 50 minutes.

RAIR Foundation has a good write up on Stephen with some of the points detailed in this session as well.

Some of the points in the first 50 minutes:

10:00 Stephen’s wife in the pentagon when its attacked on 911

16:30 Islamic Days of Rage from the Danish Cartoons to Pro-Hamas demonstrations today

18:00 President is not really in control. Arguing about Biden’s dementia is maintaining the narrative

18:45 Klaus Schwab along with Biden are people we are allowed to orient against

20:00 Afghan troop suicide rates higher than combat kill rates

20:25 Days of rage explained in terms of Danish cartoon riots

23:00 DEI is an attack on the military

28:20 on Gramsci

29:50 Hegel implemented Plato abstract.

30:00 Hegel coins the term Aufhaben, meaning to create and destroy at the same time and is a violation of the law of identity and is the root of cancel-culture.

38:20 ANTIFA and the Jacobins equivalence

44:30 knowing dialectics is a win and Marx doesnt matter is because Marxism just an application of dialectics.

48 minutes we get into the Gaza pro Hamas anti America protests across colleges

 

Stephen Coughlin: The Deep Attack – Marxism’s war on women

Posted on by

I cannot stress enough how good, and how important this is.

In Stephen’s presentation, he uses the illustration of a wild pig trap as an analogy to how we are lured into the blast zone of a dialectical bomb. Its a worthy and effective analogy.

The one below we feel is as good but perhaps for a slightly different aspect of how the COMINTERN states wage information war on us all. The “Two weeks to flatten the curve” is the easiest example, but there are many.

A few critically important Stephen Coughlin tweets

Posted on by

1. On the vaxx

2. On the hospital parking lot that was hit with an Islamic Jihad missile, did no damage to the hospital, and has caused a global set of attacks

Please click through to read the whole thread. All of them matter.

Like this for one example:

3. The Asylum Claims manager appears to admire hang gliders.

Interview with Stephen Coughlin on July 3rd, 2023

Posted on by

First of all, the summary at RAIR Foundation is quite good. It may be worth popping over to read before you watch this video.

Like much of Stephen’s material, this is a reality check on what most of not nearly all of us have wrong, and how having that wrong can cost us everything. There is some redundancy in this interview which frankly, is probably a good thing as it allows some ideas to sink in properly as opposed to jet skiing across multiple important insights, each of which are transformational in terms of how we tend to think. That can be hard to retain.

At the core, is Stephen’s favorite quote from a Rabbi he works with, and one to take heed of: “We have to stop seeing what we know, and start knowing what we see.”

The videos referenced in this interview are below, as well as the two Twitter threads for a deeper dive on some of the points.

Twitter Thread-reader 1:

Twitter Thread-reader 2:

Diplomats agree, truth can be “hate speech”

Islamophobia has no meaning: