Category Archives: Eeyore’s Opeds

1. Pretty much all Western nations, and this includes the United States depending on where exactly, is at one or another stage of the following process. The disassembly of rule of law, and its replacement with a dialectically driven state. And by rule of law, I mean fundamentals. Like equality before the law. And while that was never fully achieved, it was to the extent that most people enjoyed the fruition of their efforts and a reasonable expectation of justice for wrongs committed against them, even by the state. That individuals had rights that would stand up in court, and mostly, (and many highly sleepy people and even lawyers still believe this one) “The truth is always an absolute defence”. I remember a lawyer I knew insisting that was still the case in 2023 after 3 years of people being persecuted and prosecuted for telling the truth about Covid, the vaccines or the origins of the virus.

By a dialectical state, I mean one driven by state created narratives, hammered down to the public via Maoist mass lines, each one of which was made for the same purpose. To convince people to sacrifice their individual rights and move political power upwards to an increasingly distant and unaccountable state. And increasingly, that the only real crime is opposing a state narrative. Especially with facts and evidence, and exponentially so from a position of recognized authority. Like a doctor, lawyer, politician, or influential social media person.

Initially, Cancel culture was used as the defacto punishment. Professional bodies like colleges of physicians were used to destroy someone who dared suggest the state narrative was inaccurate or dangerous to the public. People would be accused of being racist or some other term which made them untouchable in their social and professional circles. This did not need to be something that saw the inside of a court. Like Islamic accusations of blasphemy, the entire process takes place via mob mentality. The truth of the claim has the opposite of importance, and the procedure for determining guilt is the accusation alone. It would attach a smell to the person that others could not afford to have in their orbit. Racism being one of the prime examples, even when it is used ludicrously far from its proper meaning. Like Islamophobia for dislike or opposition to a voluntary belief system, or homophobia, being opposition to special status for people who prefer some sexual practices over others. (I’ll accept some latitude in the definition of the latter. There will be objections and some of them are valid)

Slowly this process worked its way up the chain from defacto to de Jure. Arguably, but I would easily accept correction on this, it became a matter of law and courts when people started to broadcast the obvious facts around the jihad attack of many young girls at a Taylor Swift dance party. The narrative was it was an English Choir boy, while in reality it was a Muslim jihadi with a room full of Islamic State propaganda. People who pointed out the actual nature of the crime fit jihad perfectly rather than the typical behaviour of a Catholic or CoE Choir boy, were arrested and jailed. Sometimes for over a year. And that looked like the shift from a cancel culture off-the-record enforcement of state narrative, to one where the organs of state began to enforce them officially.

Canada has passed the legislation to do this. However its enforcement is nascent. We saw a leading edge example of this when police visited Tanya Gaw over a social media post in British Columbia this spring.

Being as generous as I can to the state, the police somewhat apologetically explained that they had a complaint and so they had to investigate. Sounds reasonable on the surface. But if I make a complaint to the police that my neighbour is enjoying the sunshine in her back yard, there would be no investigation unless there is some law saying you cannot enjoy the sunshine in your back yard.

(Mind you as I typed that last bit I had to stop and struggle to find a ludicrous example, as every one I thought of is probably illegal in some way. Even that one if the back yard person isn’t dressed appropriately etc etc.)

Canada has passed several laws that make counter narrative opinions illegal and are planning more. Bill C4 that criminalizes parents, fines and potentially jails them, and removes their children if they try and suggest they should not be spayed and neutered in the name of “trans-affirming-Care” till they are old enough to buy cigarettes is such a large example most don’t believe it even if you show it to them in black and white. Several people have suggested Climate Denialism and mass Indian graves at residential school denialism should be a criminal offence. And already people are being defacto punished for it with the same above mentioned methods. Loss of professional standing etc. Being reviled by legacy enemy propaganda media and so on. Probably we can blame that on the criminalization of Holocaust denialism. All efforts to do that typically just create the Streisand effect but hand the state the power to determine what can be said. And that itself is a crime against humanity. People will believe what they want about historical events. Legislating what they have to believe wont change that, but will create tyranny.

And it is with this in mind that one should read this site and look at these events. We are not looking for rage bait. We think that is counter productive for reasons stated at the end of this post.

We are looking for data and a model which we can use to understand what is happening to us, and to stop it, and reverse it. And if not reverse it, move forward to a new truth-based individualist society with equal opportunity and inequality of result. Because at the end of the day, being the author of one’s own story is the greatest freedom man has ever known. And because what constitutes inequality of result rests more on the tool you use to measure it, than the actual value of the result. As free people, we value different things, and pursue different things. And to force all of humanity to value the same thing the same way is tyranny. Communism and Islam are perfect examples.

2. For those of you who like this site and feel it has something to offer you, please consider subscribing to Daniel Greenfield’s site. He has been a purveyor of insight and reason on Islam and the left for many a year. In this article he explains why the ‘Palestinian’ flag is being used to trash every Western country, beyond the totem value of a phoney cause to justify communist and Islamic revolution. Like trashing an art gallery cause Global Warming when the real purpose was trashing the art gallery.

Why do the rioters trashing Paris wave the ‘Palestinian’ flag? Because to them, France is Israel and they’re the ‘Palestinians’ out to destroy it and replace it with their own terrorist state.

The ‘white’ in the ‘Palestinian’ flag represents the Umayyad caliphate which had once invaded France, conquered Narbonne, and genocided its Christian population, until it was thrown back by indigenous Christian resistance at the Battle of Toulouse and the Battle of Tours.

The past Islamic conquest of France is just one of the symbols in the ‘Palestinian’ flag.

The ubiquitous presence of the ‘Palestinian’ flag at riots from New York City to Milan isn’t an expression of solidarity: it’s a statement of genocidal intent for every country where it’s flown. Its colors represent the historic Islamic caliphates which once ethnically cleansed the Middle East.

Every place in the world is just a few million Muslims away from becoming another Israel. And Israel is a symbol of what the mobs intend to do to Europe and every nation they invade.

[…] The ‘Palestinian’ flag symbolizes the ability of Muslims to move to any country and then take it over. That’s what makes it a better symbol for what they are doing than any national flag or any flag short of the traditional Islamic battle flag waved by end-stage ISIS and Al Qaeda militias.

3. Muslims mass-murdered Christians in a Church in Jordan. But Christians don’t worry about it they just have a thing about Israel. or the Jews. Or something.

Jordan: Two gunmen open fire on church funeral, murdering seven, for reported ‘Islamic extremist motives’

If this was indeed a jihad attack, why would the jihadis strike at a funeral? Because the Christians were gathered together there:

“Kill them wherever you find them…” (Qur’an 2:191, 4:89, 4:91, cf. 9:5)

But why not have compassion for the mourners? Because the whole idea is to terrify and terrorize the unbelievers: “Make ready for them all that you can of force and of warhorses, so that by them you may strike terror in the enemy of Allah and your enemy…” (Qur’an 8:60)

As well as Greenfield, Jihad Watch is a must read.

Chances are, if it wasn’t for Elon Musk and his purchase of Twitter, we would never actually have known about this event at all, or, maybe a CNN sanitized and dialectically altered version of the story where the attackers were generic, tribally motivated or somehow disconnected from Islamic Jihad.

This is graphic footage showing the wounded victims at the Church in Jordan.

The above link is graphic so cannot be embedded outside of Twitter.

4. Young Israel of West Hempstead reports attempted break-in, fire: Lakeview man charged

While many people will yawn at this story, it’s worth noting that one of the mechanisms of revolution is to normalize horror by mass repetition of events like this such that the public is no longer perturbed by them. In other words, the first time a Synagogue, or even the first few Jewish institutions are vandalized because they are Jewish, the public is shocked. But at this point now it doesn’t even make the news. Even the counter-narrative news barely bothers. This newly minted lack of interest itself is the story. People can get used to anything. Perhaps part of the information warfare taking place against the legacy populations of Western nations is to normalize horror through news. To report on child rape until it stops registering as a problem. Attacks on Jewish people for being Jewish, and very soon Christians, and then all non-Muslims and opponents of communism. The arrest of people for publishing truth about Islam on social media for example, also not making the news much anymore. Well, it never made legacy news of course. But even on sites like this, with 30 arrests a day (probably a lot more) in the UK of people just stating the truth about Islam, migration or any other data or opinions that challenge state narratives, no one really reports on it much as it fails to shock. In part, it is why reading The Gulag Archipelago is so difficult. It is painful to hear endless stories of the arrest of the innocent, their torture and interrogations and prison time for nothing endlessly with no relief. Eventually, it’s just background noise.

Perhaps it may be why sites like this are tolerated even to the extent they are. Because we unwittingly assist that process.

Information warfare is so sophisticated that trying to explain even some of the simpler tactics to people results in disbelief and dismissal. Reading even just the introduction to a book like, Disinformation by Natalie Grant will straighten that out within a couple of hours. But Disinformation, or active measures as a formal method of attack has become a lot more sophisticated since the fall of the Soviet Union when that book was written. It takes a lot of sober second thought to figure out what you hear, see and even say figures in to the gestalt of the revolution that is happening around us, and more and more openly. Knowing what is true, is now the province of experts. And that is a very bad thing.

The suffering of the victims though, is not lessened whatsoever by the indifference of the population to their suffering. And yes, it is impossible to maintain outrage, anger, frustration at what is being made to happen to our former official or unofficial republics by our ruling class, we cannot let it morph into indifference. Calm, calculated action, a clear head, and a running internal inventory of what is taking place, what we are losing and what it is being replaced with, is crucial if we hope to ever get back anything like a reality based free civilization.

There are a lot of dystopian future movies and books out there, but for this particular sentiment, Fahrenheit 451 maybe says it best. Each of us recognizing that the state has totalitarian power, knows we cannot physically preserve our past and our ideas. But we can each commit to memorizing one aspect of it and bring it forward into the future.

According to Fjordman, who’s essay on this is linked at the top of every page of this site, the enlightenment in Europe happened because when the Muslims ransacked Constantinople, all the priests, monks, clergy and intellectuals grabbed armfuls of books from the treasure chest of Greek and Roman knowledge from Byzantium, and escaped Westwards towards Rome. Muslims of course eventually managed to destroy most of Byzantium’s actual history and transformed the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. But the preservation and restoration of that knowledge is what brought Europe out of a period of intellectual darkness.

So yeah, we cannot sustain the outrage and anger at these events Muslims and Communists are perpetrating against us all. but we cannot lose purpose either.

From the above linked article:

A 29-year-old Lakeview man was arrested and charged with arson and criminal mischief after allegedly attempting to set a fire at Young Israel of West Hempstead and damaging a Nassau County Police Department auxiliary vehicle near Halls Pond Park, police said.

According to Nassau County Fifth Squad detectives, officers responded to a report of criminal mischief at Halls Pond Park, 831 Hempstead Ave., at approximately 11:30 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 21. A witness reported seeing a man break the side mirror of an auxiliary police vehicle and called 911.

While officers searched for the suspect, another man stopped them and reported seeing someone starting a fire nearby, police said.

Officers responded to Young Israel of West Hempstead, at 630 Hempstead Ave., where they found Azzm Khan, 29, of Park Avenue in Lakeview, and a bush on fire.

Detectives said Khan had taken a lawn sign from the area, set it on fire and attempted to push it beneath the synagogue’s entrance door. He then allegedly placed the burning sign in a bush, causing it to catch fire, before returning to the entrance and repeatedly kicking the door, damaging it.

“Azzm Khan, a Lakeview man”. Ok then.

5. Probably one of the most common themes used on all counter-narrative sites, including this one for the first several years of its existence, was the device of asking people to imagine the same event but with reversed people in the same roles. It’s perfectly understandable why anyone would want to use that device. Demonstrating the grotesque difference between how the state treats the same event depending on who did it is an excellent tool for mining outrage. I don’t mean that cynically. It is a perfectly good reason to be outraged. But thinking it through, what may matter more is understanding that this outrage comes from the mistaken view that we still live in a system of law and order which at this point is vestigial. Like hip bones on a whale. They don’t do a lot of walking anymore but they still have hips.

Below what we see is not an example of two tier justice, but the replacement of the system of Rule of law with another one. One which is so consistent in its effects that to deny it is self hypnosis. Muslims and leftists may behave in certain ways that the legacy population could not even discuss or suggest on social media. This is perfectly consistent. That means there is a new system in place and not a corrupted one from the past.

Act accordingly one way or the other.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Ben Bankas actually says it about as well as it can be said. In fact it’s been like this fora very long time. In the 80s it became obvious that the Canadian state loathed success and worshipped mediocrity. But its hit a whole new level now.

1. Mass shooting at the Pyramid of the Moon in Mexico: When seconds count, the police are just “10 to 15 minutes away”

That’s the only point of this story. Its CTV so watch your blood pressure for all the salt you need when reading. But keep the title above in mind if you favour the Canadian state plan to disarm everyone.

2. The switch of Great Britain into a totalitarian police state must not be dismissed. Much like once Texas is Islamic, the rest of the US will fall like dominoes, once the US is Commu-slamic then so goes the commonwealth.

3. Canada: Former CIA Analyst Rebukes Senator Woo’s Attempt to Discredit the Study That Has Now Captured Woo’s Own Group as Its 576th United Front-Linked Organization in Canada

OTTAWA — A former Central Intelligence Agency analyst whose Washington think tank documented a swarm of Chinese Communist Party-linked community organizations across Western democracies — and identified Canada as the most heavily penetrated per capita — told Parliament that a sitting Canadian senator’s effort to discredit the research amounted to “a kind of laziness,” after that senator’s own newly founded advocacy group was identified by the same researchers as the 576th United Front-linked organization in Canada.

4. Canada: The destruction of all industry:

5. “Schizophrenic” Muslim behind Toronto army recruiting centre knife attack approved for Mecca pilgrimage. Ayanle Ali also plans to fly to Somalia to meet a potential bride brokered by his father

A few thoughts and hypotheticals about Canada and its immediate future.

Let’s start with some factual things:

From Peter Foster’s article about Mark Carney, with quotes drawn from carney’s own book, Values.

In his book Value(s): Building a Better World for All, Mark Carney, former governor both of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, claims that western society is morally rotten, and that it has been corrupted by capitalism, which has brought about a “climate emergency” that threatens life on earth. This, he claims, requires rigid controls on personal freedom, industry and corporate funding. […]

Carney draws inspiration from, among others, Marx, Engels and Lenin, but the agenda he promotes differs from Marxism in two key respects. First, the private sector is not to be expropriated but made a “partner” in reshaping the economy and society. Second, it does not make a promise to make the lives of ordinary people better, but worse. Carney’s Brave New World will be one of severely constrained choice, less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty: “Assets will be stranded, used gasoline powered cars will be unsaleable, inefficient properties will be unrentable,” he promises.

The other day having dinner with some old friends who live abroad, I was asked questions about what is taking place here in Canada. Eventually, after some discussion about how state policies are destroying both individual rights and prosperity in Canada, the inevitable question of “why would they do that?” was asked.

Having had more time to think about it, I want to take a shot at a better answer than I had at the time. But frankly, the why really only matters if you are trying to convince someone that the thing in question is actually happening in terms they can understand. And that is neigh impossible. The frame of reference of those doing the destruction is fundamentally different from those of us raised in a classical, Socratic, Aristotelian West.

The why in practical terms doesn’t really matter. Quite often we cannot understand the why of things without a great deal of effort, because the motives of alien systems of thought or ethics will not make sense to us, and so we will dismiss the events themselves since the motives don’t make sense to us.

“I don’t believe they would do that because no one would want that result”. Is what you get if you try and explain what is actually happening to the public.

Take for an example of a foreign system of thought, Islam. Islam holds it as central dogma that they have to murder Jewish people, destroy civilization and replace it with sharia law, Understanding why means reading thick heavy books by people like Andrew Bostom, which not nearly enough people do. Reading the Koran is not enough because most Christians or Jews who read the Koran will think its as interpretable a book as their own canon. They will read it in their own context. It isn’t of course anything like other religions. It’s a set of instructions, not an interpretation of history or any kind of allegory. It is literal instruction.

All that is needed to be understood, is that Islam is determined to kill Jewish people and or disenfranchise them wherever possible, and then everyone else who isn’t Muslim, and eventually, everyone who isn’t Muslim enough. The why of it is really trivial in terms of planning a response. In fact will prevent an effective response because they why of it will distract from the facts of it.

Israel got badly wounded on October 7th a few years ago for precisely this reason. They lapsed into a comfortable mode of thought that Gaza “just wanted the same things we all want”. Peace and prosperity etc. etc. A better life for their  children. Islam doesn’t value life. In Islam, religion is not a part of life, life is a part of religion. That isn’t me saying it. That is Sam Solomon, the former Islamic jurist. Life itself is a flash in the pan compared to an eternity after life, which in order to avoid hellfire, you must behave as Islam instructs. But again, I am deflecting to the WHY of it. (It is also noteworthy that Carney is importing a massive amount of Muslims and subsidizing their belief system, and giving them far, far less criminal punishment than legacy Canadians for serious crimes like rape and assault etc. Islam is a major destructive force in Canada and the West in general. So beyond a mere example of a different system of thought resulting in destructive behaviour, it is also an example of Carney’s policies to destroy classical Canada.)

And again, those who are unable to fathom the thinking of Islam and therefore understand the why of it, will dismiss the what of it.

-Actions are downstream from philosophy. Philosophy determines all that we do and how we act-

Most people are not able to understand a set of axioms they do not themselves hold. But they should be able to understand that actions signal intent.

In 1984, it explains that the purpose of war was to destroy the output of human productivity. Not to win or lose any particular battle or strategic objective. But to destroy all the stuff we create in order to impoverish the people. Perhaps that is to make sure they are so worried about meeting their most basic needs that the concept of revolution, of personal liberty is a great luxury for them.

Inner party members had a few more necessities which appeared as luxuries compared to the common folk in Orwell’s 1984. Enough to make them loyal party members, but not enough to allow them the luxury of political thought. Maybe that is one of the purposes of the destruction of wealth. But communist thought is dialectical thought, not Socratic. Dialectics itself is merely polysyllabic word for destruction.

Canada is doing several interesting things simultaneously. All of which have been documented on this site by authoritative sources. Top constitutional lawyers for example, and even main stream media sources.

One is that Canada is spending an undisclosed amount of billions to import, house and feed a vast number of migrants, which will, according to the century initiative who’s plan this is, (again all of this has been VERY well documented repeatedly on this site) to outnumber legacy Canadians by 3:1 more or less, and depending how you define legacy Canadians.

Canada is expropriating vast amounts of farm land to build housing for these immigrants, and now is expropriating and destroying even more farm land to build a redundant and pointless rail system no one wants.

(It is our prediction that very little of the new high speed rail will ever be built, but the expropriations, reduction in property rights already being passed into law to build it, as well as the funds needed to build it will still be taken/printed and the money used to import and feed more people who have no stake in Canadian culture or well being)

So we have these two facts: 1. The amount of food needed to sustain people in Canada is growing at a very high rate of speed. 2. The ability to produce this food is being destroyed as quickly as possible. 3. The logical, obvious and inevitable result is less food per capita. And looking at a teleological analysis, which is the only way to look at events today, this must be the actual purpose of these policies, because it is the obvious and inevitable result of them. Maybe go back to the quotes from Carney’s book above and see if that helps make it clear.

Canada, as we see from some of the items in this post, is dismantling its trade relationship with the United states as quickly as it can. That trade relationship defines our prosperity. meanwhile we have created a new “strategic-partnership” with the Chinese Communist party, and are trying to integrate with the European Union, which, to paraphrase CNN ‘Is the white face of Chinese Communism’.

In one video here in this post it is stated categorically that a foundational industry, one which is a requirement for all other forms of manufacturing has been rendered impossible to continue to exist in Canada. Again, teleology dictates that this must be the only purpose of the attack on the tool and die trade. I guess the collapse of Canadian industry due to the policies generated by the ‘Climate crisis’ did not destroy enough industries with enough speed to satisfy the Bilderberg/Carneyite,WEFers.

Hanlon’s Razor, that one should never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence, is a dialectical weapon of mass distraction. The truth, more often than not, is the opposite. Never let evil people off the hook for brutal acts of destruction and suffering with the excuse of feeble mindedness. These people are brilliant. And when not brilliant, at least bright enough to know what their intent is, or at the very least what the inevitable result of their policies are.

And most importantly, as has been repeated many times by Diana West and so many more excellent thinkers and analysts, “With the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point”.

In other words, what they say they do a thing for, is never what it is for. What the results are of the thing is always what thing was for. And that result will always be bad for the general public.