Someone needs to keep an eye on religious muslims in West Midlands for a bit

Thanks to Pym Purnell on Twitter for sending me this story:

Farmer witnesses sheep having throat slit in horror attack

A sheep farmer watched in horror as two men slit the throat of one of his in-lamb ewes in a field in broad daylight.

Adam Neachell and one of his workers were moving an electric fence in a field of turnips when they noticed the flock of Texel cross Mule ewes acting out of character.

“It is a big 120-acre field and the sheep were running towards us, as if there was a dog in with them,” said Mr Neachell, of Shrubbery Farm, Aldridge, West Midlands.

They hopped on a quad bike to investigate and came across two men with one of the ewes, with her throat slit and dying.

“The men were Asian, aged about 25-30 and wearing dark clothing,” Mr Neachell recalled. “As soon as they saw us, they ran off.”

What shocked Mr Neachell was that it was 11.30am and the field has a public footpath running through it, which dozens of walkers use every day.

In the UK, “Asian” usually means muslim. It is highly unlikely these men were Japanese for example. Pym Purnell asked the following:

We of course, have no idea if this action is a prelude to anything. But the video below from 2014 appears to be a prelude to this event in any case:

Cute sheep throat slitting song there.

German school bans all pork products because of two muslim students in 300

Direct link:

https://d.tube/#!/v/vladtepesblog/QmZvWA4SENrPJhF7yacVG8P7s4trrnmMZEQFNnu9qYCWCM

Outrage is preventing me from the calm required to write a proper article on how this is a good example of the phoney nature of multiculturalism, which is clearly just a tactical term for the utter and total destruction of classical (aka European) Civilization.

Any rational person would say if you choose not to eat a thing, then do not eat it and we will not force you to do so.

But this idea that all of us have to give up our own choices because our choices are offensive to a small, or even large percentage of an invading culture, or even a local one, is anathema.

This is dhimmitude at its most advanced.

Fight damn it.

Islamification in the West and how it actually works

One of the things that makes it difficult to get nice people in the West to understand that Islamification is happening, is they cannot allow themselves to understand the methods used to implement it.

To we, tired and ignored peons of Western nations, our bureaucracies are insurmountable monoliths of tedium from which nothing but waste and suffering can emerge.

So one can understand how difficult it is for people raised in that culture to get how a bunch of knuckle dragging superstitious thugs can get whole policies to change without filling out a single form.

Please watch the following video from the Netherlands for just one example of how its done and think, #Nike #Lego #Sony # Burger_King, #CharlieHebdo […]

Thank you C. for finding and translating this news clip for us.

Ontario muslim family ritually slaughters cow in back yard

Showing once again that multiculturalism means two things.

First, it means any culture but Western. Then it means one world culture of cultural Marxism.

Blasphemy now means …

The new normal of course is to avoid, spin or reformat any real world events that cause one to doubt the Marxist-muslim narrative, and exaggerate fictions which promote it. The Trump-Russia story, well I don’t need to say more about that to anyone actually paying attention.

But now and again there is a story with massive importance which just sort of sits there.

Actually every day. And here is one of them:

Indonesia woman irked by mosque noise on trial for blasphemy

Indonesian prosecutors have demanded an 18-month prison term for a woman who was charged with blasphemy after she complained about the volume of a mosque’s loudspeakers.

 

The ethnic Chinese defendant, Meiliana, 44, was arrested on May 18, about two years after her case triggered a riot in Tanjung Balai, a port town in North Sumatra province.

A spokesman at the local prosecutor’s office, Sumanggar Siagian, said Tuesday the sentencing demand for Meiliana was made at the District Court in Medan, the province’s capital, on Monday.

 

Prosecutors said the defendant had violated Indonesia’s criminal code by committing blasphemy against Islam, the dominant faith in Indonesia.

So in moderate Indonesia, simply complaining about the excessive volume of a minaret which blasts its hate of unbelievers, morning, noon and night, is now the crime of blasphemy. She is lucky she isn’t getting the death sentence. But clearly according to sharia she could. Its just a matter of the other meaning of “Hijra”, the increased degree of islamic adherence in a given area.

This part of Indonesia is now so islamic that complaining about the volume of a minaret is blasphemy. This is no more ludicrous, less actually, than the charge of blasphemy itself.

But it isn’t so islamic that this form of blasphemy should be met with death just yet. But anyone who thinks it won’t be in the future is in denial of the trajectory of Islamic rule in Indonesia, and frankly, everywhere else in the world except maybe the Far East.

This is on a rhumb line with M103 as one example. With very little steering we will get to that level of adherence. In some ways we are already there as complaining about increased islamification and any inconvenience and loss of equality before the law, already gets charges of “islamophobia” levelled at you.

In England not that long ago, muslims gained the rational right to bring halal food to school with them. Then, they demanded that halal food be available at schools. Then pork could not be available at schools, even though its a British staple. Then all food at schools had to be halal so that muslim kids could not be “poisoned” with non halal. You know, like peanut butter in case kids trade food with someone fatally allergic.

Then, kids started getting sent home if they brought non-halal food with them to school.

(I cannot find the link about the child who was sent home from school for bringing a non-halal lunch to a public school, but this will do for the moment)

So you can see, the slippery slope argument is not only valid, its not only proven along multiple vectors from secular or Western to Islamic, but at dizzying speeds in terms of change to a once functional civilization.

This is an important story. And should be watched, and people should complain to news agencies that it is not major news. Because it is the future, if it is not actually the present with a leftist disguise on it.

Muslim Brotherhood in the USA Part II

This is the second part of the 2 part series on islamic dominance in the USA.

It is part of the overall series by Israeli TV 10 on the Muslim Brotherhood in the West and so far we have translated part 1 of the USA and part 1 of Islamic control in France.

This one is especially disturbing however.

Very many thanks to our hard working and meticulous translator from Hebrew to English for the hard and time consuming work on these.

[Additional comment by Eeyore]

There are two parts of this video that I feel deserve pointing out in terms of critical omissions. The first is the black cleric who falsely claims that the Bible is racist while the Koran is not. In fact, the koran is much clearer and more direct about Black Africans utility as slaves. Mohammad was a slave trader and also felt that the devil was a black man and there is much more in the Koran about the inherent badness of being a black person, and also the koran and some hadiths, make out that Mohammad was unusually white, which added to his divinity.

So all in all, the Koran is far more racist than the Bible and Im pretty confident that cleric knew it.

Secondly, and more importantly. near the end the Israeli is discussing the Hudud, or sharia corporal punishments and the muslim gets away with a long anticipated logical fallacy. He makes the claim that electrocution and lethal injection and so on are more cruel than beheading.

This may or may not be true, but it commits three critical lies by omission.

The first is that beheading is only one form of hudud. Stoning to death, amputations, crucifixions etc. are certainly more cruel than Western corporal punishments.

Second is that the nature of the crime for which you receive these punishments are wildly different. Essentially, in Islam, anything you are accused of doing that inhibits the growth of the authority of Islam will get you the hudud. In the West, what we consider a crime is based on reason and the sanctity of the individual and his property rights. There has to be a victim generally speaking. And you have to have done that person wrong. With Islam, the victim is Islam itself or the perception of Islam. So blasphemy is a capital offence. In reasoned Western law, the very idea is ludicrous.

And thirdly, the method of determining guilt is vastly different. In Islam a person is guilty in essence for not being a muslim. So if you are accused of say, drinking from a well to be used only by muslims and thereby spreading your “najis”, as in the case of that young Christian girl in jail in Pakistan, you could be executed without any proof other than the say so of a muslim, who may, and even likely, has an ulterior and selfish motive. Such as they want something from you and you wont give it.

In the case of Asia Bibi, my guess would be sex.

In the West, we have to prove, using science and reason, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused actually did whatever it is they are accused of. And the cornerstone of our system is, “let 10 guilty men go free before punishing one innocent”. (This is an excellent method, except when confusing a military act with a criminal one. Then its a recipe for failure)

While this is a documentary exposing the Muslim Brotherhood and the Soft Jihad in the USA and it is not a platform for arguing with its thinking, I did feel that the narrator could have addressed these two items at the end in a voice over. In any case, this is a profoundly important documentary and I hope you will all watch it and send it out to all you know.

Thank you for reading.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

A few links on Halal food and a possible way of avoiding it

First this terrifying video from Rebel Media from July, 2016:

Secondly, one of the most widely read articles Vlad ever did. An original translation by Bear, from a French veterinarian about the health issues connected to Halal slaughter and why.

Thirdly, a Facebook link dedicated to the halal food scam in Canada, much of which applies to the USA.

And last, something I have been looking to find for some time now.

There is an app that will let you identify halal certified foods that doesn’t add your personal information to an Islamic organization’s data base. Its called Buycott.

Below is the logo from the various application sources. You install, and select OTHER in the campaigns tab and one of the options is boycott halal, which does have many thousands of registered users. You then have to ID yourself with either Facebook (bad idea) or an email which means you can use any email you can access but doesn’t have to have your name. Gmail addresses are pretty much impossible to trace I am told.

I have no personal experience with this yet, but plan to try it out the next couple of weeks at the places I typically buy food stuffs. Here is hoping its all good.

 

On Saturday night a young couple were attacked by up to five people of alien ethnic origin in Silkeborg (Denmark).

An original translation by Tania Groth

From this Danish Website:

In connection with the incident, Mid- and West Jutland police are searching for the offender, whom they describe as a man about 175 cm tall, of standard build, of an ethnic origin other than Danish, and wearing dark clothing. They are also looking for two to four other persons who participated in the attack.

The attack took place on March 12th 6:07 in Nygade in Silkeborg at Eiffel Pizzeria, where the 24-year-old and her male acquaintance sat on a staircase eating pizza.

The perpetrator took one of her pieces of pizza and threw it on the ground. This turned into a scuffle, and soon afterwards a group of men, friends of the perpetrator, arrived at the scene and started kicking and punching her male acquaintance.

Midtjyllands Avis writes that the young couple were asked if there was pork on their pizza, to which they answered yes. It was apparently this that triggered the brawl.

“Suddenly a young man of different ethnic origin rushed out and struck the young girl gratuitously on the head and she subsequently lost her hearing in one ear. At the moment we do not know whether she has permanent hearing loss! He then takes a stranglehold on her and shouts that she sure as hell should not eat pork on her pizza!” Writes the mother of the young man in a post on Facebook. The newspaper has seen the post.

To BT Police Commissioner Bent Riber Nielsen has confirmed that the perpetrator enquired about the contents of the pizza. The Police Commissioner has no further comments to add.

He hopes that the above video can help to identify the as yet unidentified men.