If you had any doubts about the UN-WHO Pandemic Treaty, you can put them to rest now – it is about control

An astonishing thing happened a few days ago in Slovakia. Well astonishing only in so much as the head of the WHO, the Marxist revolutionary Tedros, called the PM of Slovakia, Robert Fico, and asked him to bypass all parliamentary procedure and Slovakian law and just pass the Pandemic Treaty, granting all sovereignty to the UN-WHO in the event the WHO decides to call a pandemic. And of course, they can anytime whether there is one or not, and for that matter, there always is one, the question is how much does it matter?

There is a seasonal flu from the East every year. Which is why there is a different useless and dangerous flu shot every year. But in any case, and even if it is a real and serious pandemic, do we want to cede all national sovereignty, actually much much worse, bodily autonomy, in as much as the right to refuse a treatment or other means such as flu gulags or whatever else they did during Covid and whatever else they have planned for us next.

Here is the article at RAIR with a lot of the details.

From Slovakia News:

R. FICO: PHONE CALL WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

A few minutes ago, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus phoned me and asked me to change the position of the Slovak government and not to demand a vote on the pandemic agreement, which is due to take place this evening.

I reiterated that the Slovak delegation is obliged by the instructions of the Slovak government to demand a vote on the pandemic treaty.

The Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic expresses surprise that there are efforts to avoid the basic democratic institution-voting. If the vote takes place, the Slovak delegation is instructed not to support the pandemic agreement, as it undermines the principle of sovereignty of the member states and disproportionately interferes with the sphere of human rights.

The WHO Pandemic treaty passed anyway like a Quebec riding going Liberal. 

No one of course should have had any doubt it wouldn’t pass. That isn’t how things are now. There is no people’s franchise in terms of self governance or any kind of individual rights. If memory serves, at one point they pretended to take the most authoritarian parts of the Pandemic Treaty out of it, and then quietly put it back in. This is basically the COMINTERN methodology. When the EU held a ‘referendum’ on a totally illegal and unwanted ‘EU Constitution” they first held it in one member state who rejected it. France, which 54.7% rejected the document, The Netherlands where 61.54% rejected it, and Spain, where they say 81.8 % approved it. The EU changed it slightly and removed some of the more authoritarian bits and renamed it the Lisbon Treaty. Then Ireland held TWO referendums, because the EU wasn’t happy with the initial rejection, so they held another one till they got the results they wanted.

If memory serves, they then just put the nasty parts back in.

On or before May, 2023, we did an interview with one of the bravest physicians out there. Dr. Kat Lindley who toured the world during the Covid years to try and warn people about the dangers of the mRNA shots. In this interview, we discussed the Pandemic Treaty of the WHO:

The cynicism and evil of COMINTERN orgs. such as the EU, UN, Canadian and German Governments etc. are if nothing else, consistent.

In fairness to them though, a lot of this is because most people living in the formerly free Western more or less Republics, wouldn’t give up a single diet Coke to preserve their own freedoms, let alone the freedoms of others. And now the Panopticon is nearly complete.

 

Wall drops on the new Global full-control Panopticon via UN-WHO VAXX PASSPORT

This is one of the most disturbing videos I have worked on for some time. Watch carefully please.

Even this panel of experts in The Netherlands who clearly get it, are reluctant to say where this is going.

Although it is billed as a “Vaccine Passport” the impression that it is about travel is probably the least of the concerns. Clearly national borders are being dramatically redefined, if not obliterated altogether, Millions of 3rd workers are being brought in to Western countries, obviously at this point, to replace the people who built them. So this won’t be about travel.

It will be about whatever they need it to be about. Buying food. Leaving your 15 minute zone. Fuel of any kind. Anything.

Please spread this around.

Details at RAIR

Marine Le Pen makes POWERFUL victory speech after the EU election results

RAIR Foundation has the results of the overall crushing defeat for the COMINTERN parties across the EU

Macron called a snap election once he saw the results for Le Pen in the EU elections. This means has 90 days to rig the French elections against her. I hope she has a plan.

Another Member of the European Union bluntly explains the nature of that body

This site has long posted materials on the nature of the EU. Diana West probably has the best material on it out there. Her posts on Bukovsky, and expat Soviet serf who escaped to the UK where he was jailed for what is almost certainly planted evidence of child porn but in reality was for exposing the true, Soviet nature of that body makes it worth the time spent on her site alone.

Since then, many MEPs have come out against the body itself. Europeans are voting in anti-EU politicians as it is the closest they will ever get to having any kind of voice in that ‘legislature. Most famously is probably Christine Anderson of course.

In the video below, a Belgian Vlaams Belang MEP explains the plot to negate Europeans in Europe through mass unvetted, decidedly un-European migration. Story at RAIR.

As I recall, there are two layers to the EU. A beard of democracy, where elected members sit, and the European Commission or something like that, where less democratically selected people actually make the rules. Many years ago, we posted a video from a UK MEP who exposed how limited the access was by MEPs to the sanctum sanctorum of the EU. If I can find it. I’ll repost it. But the gist was that the EU library of legislation and other materials concerning how the EU would rule, was only available to MEPs by appointment. That they could not bring in any cameras or recording equipment whatsoever. That they could not reveal what they read or saw, other than by a lose paraphrasing of some materials, but no quoting verbatim.

So journalist rules for a courthouse in Canada at best. And this was for the MEPs.

The European Union is a recreation of the politburo of the Soviet Union.

As an aside, Diana’s site will go off line December 31st. The format it uses is obsolete and canot be sustained by web-servers any longer. For once, this is actually a technical thing and not a conspiracy or a plot against her or her material. Which is somewhat of a relief. But it will be a huge loss to us all when that site goes dark.

Physical fight breaks out between current and previous PMs of Slovakia

This is a tough one to break down. The details as they are understood, are at RIAR Foundation on this one.

My take on it is that the COMINTERN in the form of the EU made a deal with the Slovak mafia to get a leader in who would do their bidding by lying his way in claiming he would stop mass Islamic and African migration and the exodus of actual ethnic Slovaks due to increasingly impossible living conditions for them in Slovakia. Aufhaben der Menchen. The previous PM inserted himself into a presser using a truck loaded with loud speakers and accused the current government of bieng mobsters who are destroying Slovakia.

This came to physical blows.

There is article here from the Storiest.com that seems to detail this as well.

Croatian MEP accuses France of random death sentences by forced use of mRNA

Former Greek Finance minister busts the EU using secret recordings with gross corruption and anti-democratic agendas

We are just a few hours away from the release of #Euroleaks! To find out more, watch Yanis Varoufakis, DiEM25 co-founder and ?eRA25 MP, explain why we’re releasing the files and why now. Leaked by DiEM25 – full transcripts available at euroleaks.diem25.org Join us! https://diem25.org/join?refer=euroleaks

All the secret recordings can be heard here.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnMk-6Brd8rVEKWSWkwsWUg/videos

Thank you MissPIggy for this monumental find.

Germany: Agreement Between Merkel and Seehofer

This agreement below, between Angela Merkel and Horst Seehofer, was moments ago handed to the press and tweeted out by the CSU MP Dorothee Bär.

Original translation:

In order to better regulate, control and prevent secondary migration, we come to this agreement:

  1. We agree to a new border regime at the German-Austrian border, which ensures that asylum seekers for whose asylum procedures other EU-countries are in charge, will be refused entry
  2. To do so, we will establish transit centres, from which the asylum seekers will be directly sent back to the countries in charge (refusing entry on the basis of the legal implication of non-entry). We do not want to act uncoordinated, but come to administrative agreements, or establish communication, with the concerned countries.
  3. In those cases where countries refuse administrative agreements, the rejection at the German-Austrian border will be on the basis of an agreement with the Republic of Austria.”

    The original document as it was handed out to the press

Merkel’s part in this agreement is one single sentence: “We do not want to act uncoordinated, but come to administrative agreements, or establish communication, with the concerned countries.” This allows her to save face, while still conceding to Seehofer.

The true issue at the core of this was whether Germany has got sovereign national borders and can refuse people entry. Merkel, who ideally would like for Germany to dissolve into a supranational, non-democratic EU superstate, had, again, denied national sovereignty two weeks ago (“EU law should always have priority over German law”, on “Anne Will” talkshow on Sunday, June 10), which sparked the crisis between her and conservative new Interior Minister Seehofer. The media onslaught that ensued against Seehofer was so strong that nobody really expected him to come out of this alive.

This is an important day in the fight of Germans for their right to national self-determination, and to even exist as a nation.

Angela Merkel on her way to a crisis meeting this morning.

Merkel’s constestor, former Bavarian premier and new German Interior Minister Seehofer.

German Government Crisis: Seehofer Suggests Resignation

Angela Merkel’s challenger Horst Seehofer has announced to resign from his offices as German Interior Minster and head of the CSU, if no consensus can be reached over his demand to turn away illegal migrants at the border – a demand Merkel staunchly rejects.

Sunday’s CSU board meeting in Munich, photo: private/Facebook

On June 14, Merkel had asked Seehofer give her time to negotiate “European solutions” “with the same effect [as turning away illegal migrants at the border]” at this week’s European Summit (June 26.-27.).

The summit’s results were then presented to the German public as a full success; Merkel’s “European solution” was found; all countries had made concessions to Angela Merkel. No one in the German sphere seemed to realize that the negotiations were in fact a win for the countries who opposed migration (see Orban Wins At EU Summit: No One Takes Migrants They Don’t Want). Only yesterday, Saturday (June 30.), when Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland sent out memos, refuting that they had made resolutions with Merkel, the German public slowly began to understand that they had been fooled.

Today’s CSU board meeting lasted until late in the night. Attendees passed details to the tabloid Bild“Seehofer unmistakably made clear what he thought of Merkel’s negotiation results in Brussels: nothing.” He called the prior evening’s discussion with Merkel on the matter “pointless and ineffective”.

In the meantime, after Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, Greece’s Yanis Varoufakis came out in strong terms about Angela Merkel’s “European Solutions”:

There is no deal really, this is a typical EU fudge. They have agreed on phrasing. They celebrated it, but this hides that there was no agreement on the substance.
They gathered in Brussels to reform the Dublin agreement, which was never designed to cope with mass migration flows. Also to resolve secondary migration, which the CSU demanded action on and even put the Merkel’s government in jeopardy over it.
It is a complete failure of the European Union that has been packaged as a success, but that isn’t new, is it?

Around 10PM, news agencies suddenly reported that Seehofer had just resigned from his office as Interior Minister and leader of the CSU. The Süddeutsche Zeitung, Germany’s equivalent of the Guardian or the Washington Post, and state TV, immediately published obituaries on Seehofer.

A board member of the CSU though messaged that Seehofer had not resigned but offered his resignation, to test if he had the CSU’s full support for challenging Merkel. Seehofer allegedly stated that he had three options: to give in to Merkel, which he refused; to challenge her, for which he needed the party’s support, or to resign. According to members, the CSU expressed their support.

But when Seehofer finally left the building, he told attending press that he would resign from all offices within the next three days if no consensus on turning away illegal migrants at the border was found.

The outcome of all of this is entirely unpredictable at the moment. The way Merkel’s team are detached from reality – the majority of the population support’s Seehofer’s position – reminds of the end days of the DDR though.

 

EU Seeks Methods To Implement New Level Of Censorship

An original translation from the blog of Vera Lengsfeld.

EU-Commission Plans The Final Solution To “Disinformation On The Internet”

Guest author Hanno Vollenweider

There are growing concerns in Brussels over the disinformation of the citizens over the internet. That is why an “expert group” of researchers, journalists and the representatives of platforms is meeting in Brussels, and will finally present suggestions for a final solution of avoiding disinformation on the internet to the EU commission.

„Since the election of Donald Trump as the president of the USA at the end of 2016, there are increasing worries in Europe that fake news on the internet might drastically manipulate public debate. The EU commission therefore wants to take measures against fake news, and, for this purpose, has summoned a group of experts from the sciences, and representatives of the media industry and platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter. This ‘High Level Group’ will submit suggestions for fighting fake news on the internet until summer, write Netzpolitik.org on their website about the plans of the Eurocrats. One does not need particular skills in reading between the lines to understand what this means: The electoral success of Trump was only possible because he had a large voting base who had lost their trust in mainstream media, and who were looking for “alternative” information on the web, far away from anti Trump campaigns. This must not happen in Europe! Just imagine how Eurocracy might end, if the people in Europe were no longer to listen to the soothing mainstream media.

In the German sphere, the so-called “alternative media” are on the march, while “long-established” magazines like Bild, Spiegel, Stern, Focus, etc., keep losing readers. The reason is simple: their unconditional courting of the Merkel regime.

So many of the positive news about the mass migration was such a brazen pack of lies that it was insulting to the readers’ intelligence. This is taking vengeance now, and will probably not be reversibly easily.

And exactly that is the reason why there now will be a political interference. What is particularly telling is that, no matter what the committee of experts will suggest to the EU commission in the end, we will never know, because it has been ordered from the highest place that all documents will remain secret.

There is a reason for that.

There are two suggestions at the moment:

– So-called “Fake News” will be outright banned, and the operators of social networks, servers, alternative websites and other platforms will be required by law to completely delete content. You can imagine who will define what is “fake news” and what is not.

– The competitors of the “Fake News”, in other words, mainstream media, will be made more visible, by
promoting the news that is, in the opinion of the EU, more credible. Additionally, the awareness of “Fake News” will have to be increased by training, for example in schools.

All this reeks of censorship, cooptation (Gleichschaltung) and reeducation, and should be fought sternly before it comes into effect.

Do not rely on politicians, become active! Send news from alternative media per email to friends, educate your friends and family about the possibilities to receive news outside the mainstream media! Beat the Eurocrats by warning as many people as possible about the “reeducation” through these so-called “educational measures”.

Translator’s note:
Read the original EU statement here. It is pretty clear where it is truly aiming:
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/ansip/announcements/statement-vice-president-ansip-european-parliament-strasbourg-plenary-debate-hate-speech-populism_en