An astonishing thing happened a few days ago in Slovakia. Well astonishing only in so much as the head of the WHO, the Marxist revolutionary Tedros, called the PM of Slovakia, Robert Fico, and asked him to bypass all parliamentary procedure and Slovakian law and just pass the Pandemic Treaty, granting all sovereignty to the UN-WHO in the event the WHO decides to call a pandemic. And of course, they can anytime whether there is one or not, and for that matter, there always is one, the question is how much does it matter?
There is a seasonal flu from the East every year. Which is why there is a different useless and dangerous flu shot every year. But in any case, and even if it is a real and serious pandemic, do we want to cede all national sovereignty, actually much much worse, bodily autonomy, in as much as the right to refuse a treatment or other means such as flu gulags or whatever else they did during Covid and whatever else they have planned for us next.
Here is the article at RAIR with a lot of the details.
R. FICO: PHONE CALL WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
A few minutes ago, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus phoned me and asked me to change the position of the Slovak government and not to demand a vote on the pandemic agreement, which is due to take place this evening.
I reiterated that the Slovak delegation is obliged by the instructions of the Slovak government to demand a vote on the pandemic treaty.
The Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic expresses surprise that there are efforts to avoid the basic democratic institution-voting. If the vote takes place, the Slovak delegation is instructed not to support the pandemic agreement, as it undermines the principle of sovereignty of the member states and disproportionately interferes with the sphere of human rights.
The WHO Pandemic treaty passed anyway like a Quebec riding going Liberal.
No one of course should have had any doubt it wouldn’t pass. That isn’t how things are now. There is no people’s franchise in terms of self governance or any kind of individual rights. If memory serves, at one point they pretended to take the most authoritarian parts of the Pandemic Treaty out of it, and then quietly put it back in. This is basically the COMINTERN methodology. When the EU held a ‘referendum’ on a totally illegal and unwanted ‘EU Constitution” they first held it in one member state who rejected it. France, which 54.7% rejected the document, The Netherlands where 61.54% rejected it, and Spain, where they say 81.8 % approved it. The EU changed it slightly and removed some of the more authoritarian bits and renamed it the Lisbon Treaty. Then Ireland held TWO referendums, because the EU wasn’t happy with the initial rejection, so they held another one till they got the results they wanted.
If memory serves, they then just put the nasty parts back in.
On or before May, 2023, we did an interview with one of the bravest physicians out there. Dr. Kat Lindley who toured the world during the Covid years to try and warn people about the dangers of the mRNA shots. In this interview, we discussed the Pandemic Treaty of the WHO:
The cynicism and evil of COMINTERN orgs. such as the EU, UN, Canadian and German Governments etc. are if nothing else, consistent.
In fairness to them though, a lot of this is because most people living in the formerly free Western more or less Republics, wouldn’t give up a single diet Coke to preserve their own freedoms, let alone the freedoms of others. And now the Panopticon is nearly complete.
This video says the US is not bound by the WHO Pandemic treaty.
It’s the same with the “climate change” BS – these Marxist-themed authoritarians are only interested in scenarios which they can use to globalize their ambitions.
Thankfully, at least there is now Trump/Vance standing in their way. Frankly, there isn’t a whole lot else than Red State America in their way.
By the time the next American administration comes in, the “treaty” will be so firmly established elsewhere that it will only make sense for the US to sign on.
This is a tough one, lads. Not a peep by American news, of course
As with the ICJ and the ICC (intern’l courts), some will sign, others do not.
Even if – IFF- the USA, Russia, China deign to sign, smile and nod, they’re unlikely to obey the dictates of foreign dictators.
What’s the WHO’s enforcement mechanism?
Oh dangnab, I forgot- Pandemic refugees incoming
Plus, we’ll have to suppress the hate speech, You can’t turn down people fleeing a virus!
It is NOT all over, WHO expert James Rogusky claims.
_____________________________________________
The WHO seems to have pulled a trick to make us believe it’s over. The headlines in msm are designed to make us give up the fight.
“At this point in time, claiming victory or accepting defeat is premature. The negotiations to finalize the PABS Annex of the “Pandemic Agreement” are scheduled to resume by July 15, 2025.” […] “Signature and ratification has been deferred until completion of an Annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing tentatively set to be agreed by the 79th WHA in May 2026.”
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/this-battle-over-the-pandemic-agreement
https://rumble.com/v6to3i3-more-who-fakery-with-james-roguski-noor-bin-ladin-calls…-s02e16.html
Exactly.
To paraphrase Ben-Gurion just before the 1947 UN vote:
No illusions, no despair. Two things are forbidden: Easy optimism and sterile pessimism.
I’m trying really, really hard to fight my pessimist mode right now.