Category Archives: Evidence of Western countries becoming communist

Canadian Government blocks portal to Allison Inquiry and 3 Canadian mass-line events which demonstrate communist strategy to destroy classical Canada

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

1. The portal to the evidence of the Allison Inquiry over damage to people from the mRNA shots is still blocked on the Government network. One of the people who testified was in fact a WHO scientist and writer whose specialty was vaccines. Her testimony was similar to many others, but from her particular perch, it counts for a lot.

2. Here are what we see as three similar tactics which reveal the strategy Carney and the communists in control of much of the West have used in the past few years. There are more of course, but these three are interesting because they adhere to common purpose and tactics. Also are derived from the same strategy.

A: No Kings

B: No pipeline

C: No 51st state.

It is a foundational principle of analysis for this site that “with the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point”. Thus when the left launches a narrative attack, the reason for it is never the reason, but the ultimate (and obvious when you think of it)  intended result, (which has little to nothing to do with the protest or objection) always does. So in those three examples, we can illustrate this.

The No Kings protests were and are the most risible. At one point, a lot of leftists were lined up at the US Embassy in Ottawa with No Kings posters, slogans, chants etc. even effigies of Trump while at the same time, King Charles was in Parliament laying it out to Canada how things were gonna be from now on. The No Kings was a propaganda effort to try and paint Donald Trump, at the time and to this day, one of the very few counter-revolutionary politicians in the world, as a King, tantamount to a dictator, and therefore must be opposed. It likely worked better on the Americans as they fought a revolutionary war against a King. The Canadian left doesn’t care about the logic of it. They just wanted to focus hatred on Donald Trump, 1984 style. But the ultimate goal is to create a communist dictatorship. Paint Donald Trump as a King in order to make him appear as an unelected dictator,.(In Canada, that will tie into item C nicely.) So “No Kings” means get rid of an elected president who is restoring individual liberties, and replace the system with a communist dictator.

Here is one of the No Kings demos from June 2025 at the US Embassy.

The pipeline protests, including no shortage of terrorism in Canada, was really part of the mission to destroy Canada-US relations and trade. Mark Carney who is in fact, King of the Net Zero bollux, approved a pipeline, but one that doesn’t go North South to the US, but west to far west, presumably so that Canadian oil can be exported to China. Carney has also fast tracked it. Spelling it out, this means Canada at the state level was never anti oil, or anti-pipeline. Which also means not anti-CO2. They were anti-USA and especially anti-Trump. Again, the point is never the point. The replacement of a republic like state, with solid principles of liberty and individualism with an elitist run communist state where all decisions are made by faceless nameless bureaucrats thousands of miles away and where no mechanism exists for the people affected by those decisions, IS THE POINT.

No 51st state should be obvious at this point. Canada faked patriotism when Trump trolled Canada on the 51st state thing. They suddenly became flag waving patriots ranting about national sovereignty. Mind you, these were all mass line narrative attacks, seeded by small groups of professional protestors, fed to the public via CBC which landed in the brains of people who think legacy media contains information as opposed to narratives and propaganda. For a few years after the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, when you saw a Canadian flag on a vehicle or a home window, you know it was an actual patriot, who valued individualism and liberty. Essentially people who remembered Canada as a republic more or less, (definitions to follow) as opposed to a malleable ‘Democracy’ where the absolute fundamentals can be changed by nudging the culture with a mass line. Shortly after the 51st state troll, the left took back the Canadian flag, and when you see it in a home now, its a token of fealty to Mark Carney, anti-Americanism, and policies that are actually deracinating Canada faster than most would believe. The flag is a token of loyalty to the destruction of Canada. But then a history of the flag of Canada suggests the Maple Leaf version itself was intended to do that, as it replaced a flag, The Red Ensign, which contained meaningful symbols of Canadian heritage.

Carney and his dialectical engineers have decided to drop the no 51st state chanting for a yes to the 27th member state of the Communist European Union. The EU has a layer above the European Parliament which is the European Commission. They are pretty much totally unaccountable. Below is a video that an Irish MEP made, showing how the EU Library was pretty much locked away from not just the public, but even MEPs. They could only go in so long as they had no recording equipment whatsoever. No camera, no cell phone, and they could not leave with any of the materials concerning the operations of the European Commission. If the odd MEP went rogue and tried to expose the EU for what it is, they would have no proof of the claims they would make about the dictatorial and communist nature of the European Commission.

I really hope you all watched the video above. This is from 10 years ago. This is what the EU is. And it at least suggests that the European Parliament is a Potemkin legislature. A puppet theatre to release steam from any members of the public who notice the destruction of their nation states due to EU and UN policies. This way, the odd MEP can stand up and make a stink and the proles can pretend that something is being done about it. In fairness, it is, but in the opposite way from what they wanted.

Search for videos and articles by and about Vladimir Bukovsky. Especially if you can find articles on him via Diana West.

A few words about Carney and Von Der Leyen’s plot to eliminate Canada

Posted on by — 12 Comments ↓

First, the real decision maker for the European Union, Ursula von Der Leyen’s speech about annexing Canada given on the morning of September 16th, 2026

So they created a new category for membership. Canada is not an actual member, Canada is an “Associate member” of the European Union. This is so the powers that be can get everyone to relax that it isn’t really an actual membership to the EU where Canada surrenders all its autonomy to massive bureaucracy that determines everything that takes place in the country by unelected bureaucrats who have never even visited the country. But in reality, it is a device for making it happen so quickly Canadian’s heads will do the full Linda Blair, right before doing the Linda Lovelace.

Some of us may remember the UN Migration Compact which instructed all UN member states to allow any and all 3rd world migrants into Western Countries, and instructed media to only be allowed to report on this positively. Of course when the very few people who bothered to report on it did so, we were all assured that a UN compact was not something anyone had to do. Except everyone did. Obviously.

These devices, EU associate member, UN compacts, anything which is a horrifying move towards the destruction of the Nation State should be taken very seriously. What they show you they are going to do to you, they are going to do.

Australia UK and Canada switching to criminalization of state narratives from rule of law: 3 data points involving comedy

Posted on by

1. And yet the British have not yet woken up to the fact that they “are not British anymore”. If this story, and the arrest of 30 people a day for similar defiance of narrative, and even some of the most quintessential British cultural accelerants like Graham Linehan, who wrote some of the best TV comedy in British History (The IT Crowd can cause breathing difficulties from excessive laughter) then I guess they will never get it. This is the best example of the boiling frog so far. We see this officer taking about his own arrest and conviction for a meme about Islam which represents about 1/100,000 of the danger and severity of the actual threat of Islam to all other systems of thought, and they still do not understand that a full on communist/authoritarian revolution has taken place in that polity. That the police officer himself in this interview with a lifetime on the force could be subjected to these measures and not state the obvious fact that Britain is about as British as Canada is Canadian.

This is of course the same as the Gelen Grus issue in Ottawa at the level that matters. You may not criticize or defy a state narrative. In Helen’s case, that the mRNA Gene therapy shots are safe and effective, and in the UK, that Islam is the Religion of peace.

2. Same issue: Banned in Australia for jokes

3. Canada was WAY ahead of the curve though with the dialectically named, “Human Rights Commissions”. A proxy court for the communist state to enforce narrative without the need for the transformation of law as it was understood on the street.

Full interview from Michael Hanson’s Killing Canada documentary of 2018 of Guy Earle over his joke in 2007 is here:

 

 

Brazil has moved to the last stage of the dialectical replacement of rule of law and reason to narrative based Marxist repression

Posted on by

An astonishing story caught my eye last week. Typical for this site, it is the relatively subtle things we find important, rather then the blunt force trauma which now overwhelms social media today. Of course, this is because the Islamic Jihad, aided, fuelled even by the Left, has reached the kinetic stage of the revolution in most parts of the West. We can know this in part because of the dialectical reporting and sentencing of perps of Islamic and African, and even Sikh origins as compared to the years long sentences for counter-narrative tweets by Brits who oppose these kinds of actions.

But this story out of Brazil, where a judge sentenced parents for properly raising their children, is the final stage but purely of the Marxist kind.

Here is RAIR Foundation’s Coverage of this story in question.

It is a nicely solid representation of the facts and its meaning.

But if there was anything to add, it would be the progression we see with both Islam and leftism in its war against Western culture and law.

First, there is a request for “reasonable accommodation”. The request is politely made for the legacy population of Western lands to acquiesce to a feeble and humble minority who have quaint customs and rituals that after all, make us look just vanilla and we should all aspire to be like them.

(See Item 2 here)

Then there is greater and greater request for accommodation and each previous one becomes entrenched in law. Eventually, the Westerner legacy population discovers it no longer has the choice for its own cultural preferences at all. For example the lack of any meat in many Canadian cities that is not Halal. Or the inability to speak truthfully about Islam or any history which presents Islam for what it actually is.

Then you see a story like this one, where a Muslim threatened a regular American with a knife for walking his dog on a public sidewalk in front of a mosque. The amazing thing was that the police actually arrested the Muslim and as far as we know, charged him nearly appropriately. The charge should actually have been terrorism, because threatening violence to force a chance in the legal behaviour, or the doing of violence for that matter, is the only rational definition of terrorism after all.

But in any case he was charged with something involving violent crime and so far the dog walker has not. In England, it would have been the full meal deal for the dog walker. We already have seen close approximations of this with a woman who was told to leave an area with her dog because Muslims objected to it.

In Brazil however, a couple was jailed and fined for raising their children properly, even though the prosecution actually asked for an acquittal. The prosecution, asked for the accused to be acquitted for their non-crime of raising their children without exposing them to SOGI and other destructive Marxist dialectic attacks intended to destroy the family. And the Judge convicted, fined and JAILED them.

This is a profoundly important event. It is a stage of the revolution where the state goes from asking for tolerance for insane things like “trans-rights” to literally jailing parents for not exposing their children to lewd music and culture, and Trans-narrative attacks on their identity. These kids however all spoke Portuguese, English and Latin, played classical piano and in general had a better education than the vast majority of Westerners since the 1960s.

This is a precise parallel to what Islam is doing across the West. Pay attention. This is not some philosophical gobbledygook. This is exposing the blueprint.

Another brick in the wall restricting truth as hate speech

Posted on by

yesterday we reposted the video of Stephen Coughlin at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe here.

If you haven’t seen the video please do watch it.

Here is a rather worthwhile dot to connect to it.

From May 28, 2026

Belgian Court Rules ‘Factually Correct’ Remarks Can Be Hate Speech

Truth is now criminal hate speech if used to “incite hatred,” according to a Belgian court. 

The ruling came in the case of anti-migration activist Dries Van Langenhove, who said in a post on X that, “it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge’s frustration.”

Van Langenhove’s conviction was based on a lecture given in 2024 at Catholic University Leuven, in which he linked mass migration to “crime and a deterioration of our quality of life.”

He said, “Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.”

The judge, however, in his ruling, said, “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

According to Van Langenhove, the judge and prosecutor did not dispute the facts in his speech but said he created a “hostile atmosphere of us versus them” regarding migrants. 

It is Van Langenhove’s second hate speech conviction, and he faces another court case in September. 

He claims there are a dozen active criminal investigations against him for hate speech and has already paid more than 420 thousand euros ($489,000) in legal fees.

 

Two posts about the state of liberty in Canada and how the state uses antisemitism laws to manufacture antisemitism

Posted on by

Link to article

One line of the article is here:

  • “accuses a group of carrying out secret conspiracies to gain global control or that they are plotting to destroy western civilization”

But it’s a fact. The Muslim Brotherhood is indeed doing exactly that. The Project, and the Memorandum both explicitly state what the plan is for religious Muslims to do as it is specified within Islam’s own canon. My guess based on how things have been in Canada for the last 20 years or so, is people who make factual and verifiable claims about certain groups will face persecution, while people who launch massive conspiracies about Jews, which takes place in every mosque every day, will not. Why can we say this? Because it has already been tested when Muslims have broken existing and far more rational ‘hate crimes laws’ if such a thing is possible.

In any case, anyone who thinks this is great and antisemitism will be illegal and finally Jew will be protected from hate yada yada wuzza wuzza, lemme tells ya, that ain’t how it’s gonna go.

It will massively increase hatred of Jews who will be seen, and partially correctly, as being the architects of destroying freedom of speech. They will suddenly appear to be that exact thing which people have accused Jews of being forever. A tiny group that controls everything. And there will only be enforcement against whatever target suits the real interests of the state. Chances are extremely high that groups like the dialectically named, “Canadian Anti-Hate Network” will fund a few Nazis like Second Sons or Diagalon, and the state will pick off a few of them to make examples of them. We can say that with high confidence because their parent organization the SPLC was funding every hate group they could find.

But no charges against any mosques that actually demand genocide of the Jews at pretty much every prayer session and twice on Fridays.

This is one example out of hundreds available on MEMRI.Org, RAIR Foundation, Gates of Vienna and here for that matter. This one is from Toronto.

And below is a story about one brave Montrealer who tried to bring one of the most virulent imams to the Human Rights Commission.

But wait! There’s More!

Full text:

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

 

The right of exit from Canada is being removed one step at a time: First step, massive financial pain

Posted on by

During Covid, we did at least one, if not multiple posts on what we viewed as at minimum, a trial run of communism in a number of aspects.

The last right in any free society, is the right to leave. To say you don’t like it whenever you are, and bug out for greener pastures. That after all, is what millions upon millions of religious muslims did to their Muslim countries in order to come to the West and make them Muslim countries after all.

During Covid, Canada implemented a program where you could not leave the country, or even travel within it without the right papers. Only, to get those papers, you had to take two of a potentially lethal and often very damaging experimental mRNA injection or often more when the first boosters came out, in order to be able to board any kind of transportation beyond a private car.

As I recall, there were actual provincial roadblocks between Ontario and Quebec and other Canadian provinces to check for these papers, if you were allowed to cross at all.

Ottawa Hull Bridge, February 2022

Hwy 417 Ottawa Sept. 2021

Naturally the state under Trudeau used the opportunity to print millions upon millions of dollars to ‘develop an app’ that would track people’s movements and allegedly streamline the process of the state allowing people to leave, again, the most fundamental right in a free society, or make it easy for them to prevent or allow nationals to return. Another fundamental right by the way, is the right of citizens to enter their own country.

Gad Saad’s post is very disturbing. But in typical dialectical fashion, the state has created an excuse to justify it. Kind of like when a public school teacher convinces your child to get spayed or neutered and face a short life full of loneliness and medical issues because it’s “trans-affirming care”.

Here is what Grok says about the nature of the exit tax:

What Canada’s “Departure Tax” (or Exit Tax) Actually Is

This isn’t a flat fee for leaving — it’s the deemed disposition rule under Canadian tax law (in place for decades). When you cease to be a Canadian tax resident:The CRA treats most of your assets as if you sold them at fair market value on the day before you leave.
You pay capital gains tax on the unrealized gains (only 50% of the gain is taxable, but at your marginal rate — which in Quebec for high earners can be around 50%+ combined federal/provincial).
This applies to things like:Non-registered investment accounts (stocks, ETFs, mutual funds)
Cryptocurrency
Private company shares
Collectibles, art, jewelry, etc.

Exemptions (important ones):Principal residence (your home)
RRSPs, RRIFs, TFSAs (tax-sheltered accounts)
Pensions and certain other registered plans

You must file Form T1161 if your assets exceed $25,000 FMV, and the tax is due with your final Canadian tax return.

canada.ca

Many countries (US, Australia, Germany, France, etc.) have similar rules to prevent people from walking away from taxes on gains that accrued while they lived there and benefited from the system.Why It’s “Large” for SaadGad Saad has had a long, successful career as a professor, author, and public figure. If he has substantial non-registered investments, appreciated stocks, or other assets with big unrealized gains, the bill can easily hit hundreds of thousands (or more). He hasn’t publicly stated the exact number, but his reaction and the “10+ years to recover” comment suggest it’s a very painful hit — especially on top of Quebec’s already high taxes.

@GadSaad

He’s moving to the University of Mississippi (US) primarily due to safety concerns (antisemitism and threats in Montreal) and high taxes, but this exit bill adds serious financial friction.Is It Fair? The DebateCritics (including Saad and many leaving Canada) call it punitive, a barrier to mobility, and a driver of brain drain at a time when Canada is losing skilled people.
Defenders say it’s reasonable: you benefited from Canadian infrastructure, education, healthcare, etc., while building that wealth — so pay tax on the gains before taking it elsewhere. Similar systems exist abroad.
Practical note: There are ways to defer the tax (by posting security with the CRA) in some cases, and good tax planning before leaving can reduce the sting.

Bottom line: It’s completely legitimate under long-standing Canadian rules — not a new “punishment” aimed at Saad. But for successful people with significant unrealized gains, it can feel like a brutal final tax grab when they’re already choosing to leave for other reasons.

So this—-> This isn’t a flat fee for leaving — it’s the deemed disposition rule under Canadian tax law (in place for decades). When you cease to be a Canadian tax resident:The CRA treats most of your assets as if you sold them at fair market value on the day before you leave.

Actually is a wonderfully self contradictory statement. In other words, yes. it is an exit tax.

More from Grok after explaining teleological analysis:

What the rule actually does in outcome

It imposes a large, immediate liquidity hit (often hundreds of thousands to millions) on people with substantial unrealized gains when they decide to leave. You pay tax on paper profits without receiving cash from a real sale.
This creates a strong financial deterrent to emigration, especially for successful, mobile, high-net-worth or high-earning individuals (professors, entrepreneurs, professionals) who have built wealth in Canada.
It functions as a final tax trap — you’ve already paid high lifetime taxes (Quebec’s combined marginal rates >50%, plus consumption/property/carbon taxes), and now one more big extraction as you walk out the door.

Real-world results (not theory):Canada is seeing record net emigration, particularly among university-educated and high-earning people. Departures are up sharply (e.g., Q3 2025 was 34% higher than pre-pandemic levels). Skilled emigrants skew young, educated, and in high-demand fields.

thehub.ca

Brain drain data shows top earners (top 1% and next 9%) leaving for the US at notable rates, contributing significantly to Canada’s productivity and GDP-per-capita gaps.

thehub.ca

The rule doesn’t stop everyone, but it raises the cost of leaving and keeps some people staying longer than they want — paying ongoing high taxes instead.

This aligns with your point: the telos (end goal/effect) is retaining taxable bodies and capital in the system. Governments rarely admit “we want to make it painful to leave,” but the structure achieves that. Similar mechanisms exist in other high-tax jurisdictions for the same practical reason.

Covid, as we said at the time, was a trial run for communism.

The greater tragedy is the number of Canadians who will not see it even as it is being constructed around them. Even get hostile if you try and politely explain the facts to them as they are right in front of their faces. Which was also the case during Covid.

 

Carney tips his hand to show his communist revolutionary leanings

Posted on by

Although Carney himself answers questions in this interview in typical Emperor’s New Clothes fashion, in other words, incomprehensibly but in a way that makes you feel that you are the stupid one if you don’t pretend to understand admire its wisdom, the initial question and the nature of the person who asks the question makes it all very clear. Why did Carney agree to be interviewed by Irish Communist, Alex White SC. A former Labour Party politician.

Fist, for those that don’t know who Antonio Gramsci is, look at this very brief summary in Key Wiki:

Antonio Gramsci (January 22, 1891 – April 27, 1937) was an Italian political theorist and founding member and onetime leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s theories have quietly been incorporated into American culture for at least 50 years. Gramsci believed that the way to incorporate Marxism in capitalist societies was best achieved from the bottom up by stealthily changing the beliefs of the culture itself, called “cultural hegemony.” Cultural hegemony involves softening, or radicalizing, the culture’s beliefs about various social issues such as homosexuality, marriage, education, women’s issues, religion, divorce, pornography, media, abortion and established political parties. The idea is to move everything to the left so that eventually new norms are rooted into society – a Gramsci form of the Overton Window if you will…[1]

Gramsci Symposium

The College of Arts and Letters at Michigan State University hosted “Gramsci Now: Cultural and Political Theory,” an international symposium to mark the 70th anniversary of the death of Antonio Gramsci, November 9-11, 2007 in East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Presenters were: Stanley Aronowitz, Joseph Buttigieg, Kate Crehan, Roberto Dainotto, Michael Denning, Benedetto Fontana, Stephen Gill, Marcia Landy, Guido Liguori, Frank Rosengarten, David Ruccio, Epifanio San Juan[2].

References

Template:Reflist

  1. Communist Antonio Gramsci Resides In The White House NewsReal Blog, Nov. 24, 2010

  2. http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org/communications/news.html

As an interesting aside, Pete Buttigieg, who was US secretary of Transportation under Biden (Obama’s 3rd term) was the son of Joseph Biden, who was the founding president of the International Gramsci Society, and spent much of his academic career translating and editing the definitive English edition of Gramsci’s prison diaries. He was a Marxist prof. of literature at Notre Dame.

So for Carney to be discussing accomplishing Gramsci’s vision with an Irish communist, well as the expression goes, “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” -John Heywood, 1546.

I haven’t made it all the way through this yet. But here is the entire video from which that except was taken in case anyone wants to know if there is a contextual conflict between my claims and the entire speech.

Please do not skip this post: FIVE major indicators of where Canada and the Anglosphere are now

Posted on by

1. Law Prof. Bruce Pardy speaks to how the state in Canada treated the Freedom convoy and its supporters are half of the equation proving that Canada was, is and is becoming an increasingly totalitarian authoritarian state.

On occasion one may find oneself in debate with leftists over the Freedom Convoy. So far, I have never had a disagreement with anyone who was actually in attendance. In fact I know of people who vehemently disagreed with the Convoy at the time until they were made to go and check it out in person, at which point, they admitted they had been lied to about it. However, all the people I have had this disagreement with, watch CBC, CTV and Global.

2. I found this interesting an a couple of levels. For one thing, I didn’t know she was talking about the UK till very far into the video. Which shows you that galloping statism, tyranny, is a Commonwealth wide issue. Not just Canada or the UK or Australia etc. But also because there is one point with which I very much disagree. She says this is not a new problem but has been developing over hundreds of years. This is not true. This is the result 100% of relatively recent efforts, maybe over 100 or so years by communist think tanks like The Frankfurt School, Runnymede Trust, The Fabian Society, the WEF, almost certainly the secret meetings of Bilderberg etc.

The battle between state power and individual power is indeed an ancient one. But the destruction of Republics, which basically formed after WW2 in the West is a recent effort, even if it has historical ties and precedents.

She also appears to be wearing a Catholic Rosary. Which kinda confirms that the only people willing to risk their personal liberty and safety for the rights of all of us, tend to be those who believe in God. Those who believe life is all you get, tend not to put themselves out for others like she is.

3. Similar stories in the West are quite common. This is because Muslim women are taught that the only virtue they can have is by supporting Islamic precepts, and the practice of Islamic precepts.

4. Can’t stress this importance of this enough, both to the UK and to Canada.

Note the dry contempt with which the Judge reads a Tweet, and then interprets it in a way to make it criminal and worthy of two years in prison.

The United States may have to give the same access to enter for British, Canadian and Australian people as they did once to Cubans.

Stephen Coughlin once, when at the curious meetings of the OSCE asked specifically if truth could be hate speech. This was May, of 2015. PLEASE pay close attention. This was clearly predicted by Maj. Coughlin and many others 11 years ago and earlier.

We are not posting it as an “I told ya so!” but because often when the prediction and model used for it is paired with the results down the road, it helps to cement it home what has actually happened. This is a very hard pill for many to swallow. Probably not people who read this site, but for sure the friends and family of those who read this site. We are attempting to provide data points to help enough people come around before the panopticon is complete. Which is very soon. To hopefully mobilize people into some kind of action that will stop and reverse the galloping tyranny and destruction of our nation-states, as well as the total deracination of our identities.

5. On this last one, I argued with Grok for quite a while on its veracity. The way it is filmed, graded and edited, I was pretty sure it was fake. It has the classic Hollywood, Orange and teal set design and colour grading. I love that look, but it’s better reserved for fiction as that is its purpose in a way. To help people ease into a narrative. The camera angles and so on. But Grok assured me this is real and provided me with the links to the data to prove it.

So once again, another massive conspiracy theory which we are all shouted down for, becomes fact.

DNI Press Release 

DNI graphics as evidence of the contention of bio-labs in Ukraine and elsewhere, doing gain of function work etc. 

And now I really wanna know more about tick borne illnesses.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This particular post feels like a kind of end game statement in a way. And in a way it is, This is the evidence that much of what we have claimed is happening, has now happened. As the statement at the Gates of Vienna says, “We are in a new phase of a very old war”. This is true. But this particular phase may mean that the normal means of defending one’s individual identity only exist as mirages, when they seem to exist at all.

Once again, we may have to look at the Egyptian example where the people took to the streets in 2011, and stayed there till they deposed a tyrant, not once, but twice within a short period. The first protests lasted from January 25th to February 11. The second round to depose Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammad Morsi, was in June/July of 2013. Both protests being around the same length as the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, but with a LOT more people. But then the people have to have a cost benefit to motivate them to take to the streets like that, which the current communist state apparatus may be too clever to allow to occur.

A video analysis of the new state policy towards using force and self defence

Posted on by

This is a worthy video detailing the facts on the ground of migrants (and non-white minorities) within Western nations when it comes to crime and self defence. It is worth watching.

Here is my four line summary making the critical distinction that this is deliberate.

The state disarms its citizens and passes strict laws against use of force and especially any kind of force multipliers.

The state then imports millions of people from nations hostile to the West culturally, religiously and for whatever reasons.

The state then de facto, does not apply these new laws to the invited and state supported migrants, such that there is a noticeable and viceral imbalance when it comes to how state law enforcement agencies treat actual citizens of Western nations Vs. invaders. The most obvious De Jure example would be Sikhs being able to carry knives even in schools. But looking at sentencing of actual criminals who are caught with illegal weapons, we also see a de facto permissiveness towards illegal or invited hostile immigrants to Western nations.This results in enormous numbers of armed migrants hostile to the local population, doing attacks frequently enough that it becomes clear to all, consciously or semi-consciously that legacy citizens are second class citizens in their own lands and even homes.

The progression of events make it impossible to not know that this is deliberate state disenfranchisement of the legacy citizens of Western nations, except to the most determined leftists who will cling to their belief that this is a good thing and a form of justice, and the self blinding centrists who would rather feel good believing in a benevolent state than feel as uncomfortable as they should knowing how things actually are.

Interview with Luke Neilson of the JCCF on some of the legislation threatening Canadian liberties

Posted on by

Short discussion with lawyer from the JCCF on some of the more outrageous, (even though voted down ultimately) aspects of some of Canada’s most totalitarian legislation.

Article at RAIR Foundation

Interview with Luke Neilson

Nicholas Jordan Wagter 48 hour psychiatric hold has been extended indefinitely?

Posted on by

The other day we did an article about Nicholas Jordan Wagter, who was Soviet style kidnapped into a mental hospital, bypassing any form of due process because apparently he was passing out information about Chinese penetration of the Canadian political and industrial institutions, and waking people up to how much of a threat that is.

There is an update:

Press For Truth does a decent video above. But again, like during Covid and the Vaxx etc. the central question is missed. Probably because the Canadian spirit has been broken for generations now.

The question of course is: Why does the state have the power to do this? Why is there no due process? How can this be allowed to happen?

Sir William Blackstone (1723–1780), an English jurist, judge, and politician, once said when speaking about criminal law:

“It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”
The version we need is let ten crazy people walk the streets before you certify one and imprison them and force mind altering drugs on them. But the fact is, we clearly already have that. The cities are crawling with the mentally unwell and even violently so. Often from recreational drug abuse, but that is hardly the point. This arrest and detention is as much an egregious breach of all spirit of the law of a free country as was the detention of Dr. Mel bruchet, who was forced into a mental hospital, also in Vancouver, for standing in front of a hospital with the FACTS about how many babies died due to the mRNA Vaxx injections.
In Canada, if you have counter-narrative views, and worse, if you have PROOF of those views, then Caveat Orator. Let the speaker beware.
Gulag Archipelago (Volume 2, Part III)
During a hunger strike, a prosecutor asks an inmate ‘Why are you torturing yourself?’. Stunning the prosecutor with its ‘irrelevance’, the inmate replies: ‘Justice is more precious to me than life’. This individual is subsequently transferred to a psychiatric facility, where a doctor flatly affirms: ‘We suspect you may be a schizophrenic’.

Here is the interview that was done in the coffee shop that led to his state-kidnapping.

We cleaned up the audio as best as we could and subtitled it as accurately as the audio quality allowed.

Please leave your thoughts in the comments.

Discussing this case with Grok we have a few things to add. The story so far, and what the state is able to do to him, ‘legally’ under the form 4 they used to kidnap him.

  • The coffee shop “ambush”: Several weeks before his detention, Wagter was in a café (reportedly for a meet-and-greet with like-minded people). A psychiatrist (Dr. Christine Taylor) and another health worker approached him. They identified themselves and tried to do an on-the-spot “mental health check.” He told them to read his materials and leave him alone, then got up and left. He later described it as feeling like an orchestrated confrontation.
  • The pull-over and certification: On May 23, 2026, Vancouver Police pulled him over while driving. Officers told him he had already been certified under BC’s Mental Health Act (Form 4) based on the earlier café observation + input from his family. He was taken to Vancouver General Hospital for involuntary assessment.
  • Initial 48 hours ? ongoing: It started as a short-term hold (Form 4.1 allows up to 48 hours), but a second certificate was issued, extending it (up to 1 month initially, with possible renewals for longer periods). As of the latest posts (May 27–28), he is still being held at VGH and claims he has been cleared by other doctors but remains detained.

Why it feels very Soviet:

  • No immediate crime.
  • Certification based heavily on observation in a public place + family input, without a fresh full in-person evaluation at the time of apprehension.
  • He was filming police during the stop (his right), and officers asked him to stop.
  • He is an activist/researcher who posts about Chinese influence in Canada, government overreach, and other controversial topics. Supporters call it retaliation / “medical kidnapping” to silence him. Critics say his content shows signs of genuine mental health concerns (e.g., fringe ideas about wireless tech, energy fields, etc.).

This case has gone viral in alternative circles exactly because of how it looks: a seemingly functional, educated young man with no violence or immediate threat being detained after public political/activist activity.It’s a fresh and very raw example of how BC’s Mental Health Act can be applied — broad powers that critics say are ripe for abuse, especially when someone is outspoken.

Under the order that they have on him, can they force psychiatric drugs into him?
Yes — under BC’s Mental Health Act, once someone is certified as an involuntary patient, they can be forced to take psychiatric drugs against their will. How it works in practice:

  • Form 4 (the initial certification) allows detention for assessment.
  • Within 24 hours of admission, the facility must complete a Form 5 (Consent for Treatment – Involuntary Patient).
  • On the Form 5, if the patient refuses medication (or is deemed incapable of consenting), the facility director (or designate) can authorize treatment anyway. This includes psychiatric drugs (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc.).
  • Once authorized, staff can use chemical restraint (forced injection) or other coercive measures if the patient physically resists.

This is standard under the Act. Involuntary patients explicitly cannot refuse psychiatric treatment, including medication. For Nicholas Jordan Wagter specifically:

He is currently held under this system at Vancouver General Hospital. If they have completed (or will complete) the Form 5 authorizing treatment, the hospital has legal power to medicate him against his wishes — even if he is conscious, competent in other areas, and objects.This is exactly why many people call these cases “Soviet-style” — the state can override bodily autonomy on psychiatric grounds with relatively little external oversight in the short term.Note: He (or his representatives) can request a Review Panel hearing to challenge the certification, and he has the right to a lawyer and a second medical opinion, but the treatment can still proceed while that’s happening.This is the legal reality in BC right now. Let me know if you want sources for the exact forms or how to support his case.
Comparing what a single psychiatrist can do Vs. the entire justice system to any person in Canada:
Criminal arrest (normal justice system):

  • Police arrest you ? You have the right to call a lawyer immediately.
  • You must be brought before a judge within 24 hours (bail hearing).
  • You are presumed innocent.
  • The state cannot force psychiatric drugs into you.
  • You have full Charter protections, evidence rules, right to silence, etc.

Mental Health Act certification (what happened to Wagter):

  • One doctor (often with family input or a single public sighting) signs a Form 4.
  • You can be picked up off the street (or pulled over) with no warrant.
  • No immediate right to a lawyer in practice.
  • No judge has to approve the initial detention.
  • They can and do force psychiatric drugs (including antipsychotics) into you against your will, even if you are competent and refusing.
  • The “due process” (Review Panel) comes days or weeks later — after you’ve already been medicated.

The abuse of the medical system to discredit counter-narrative people in BC

Posted on by

This story about a BC man who was essentially arrested and forced into a mental health facility for evaluation is still undetermined as to its nature. At least fully. However, this site has a regular reader who had a VERY similar thing happen to her. She may or may not choose to share her experience in the comments. But it mirrors this event nearly perfectly. Even to having 2 doctors determine that she should not be in the facility, and not being let out till she saw a judge.

Secondly, even what we found about his posts on Social media indicate that his views are counter-narrative, and therefore considered to call his ‘sanity’ into question.

Thirdly, there was a doctor we wrote about a fair amount on this site who was sectioned, as they used to call it, during Covid for questioning the vaxx’s effects on the not-yet born. This would be Dr. Mel Bruchet. He was locked up for speaking clear and obvious vaccine truths if memory serves. In fact he was saying much what the Helen Grus research would have turned up. Helen in fact, is relatively lucky compared to Bruchet.

All of this is forward to the current issue. But an event means far less as an isolated case than when you flesh out the context in a relevant way. This is not reaching to a rhetorically useful level of abstraction. That is one of the leftist’s greatest rhetorical cons. We are showing that people with counter-narrative views, especially when they have some academic or societal authority can be destroyed without even the decency of a captured legal process, by channeling them into the mental health system. The gentleman currently facing this Soviet style tactic is a biophysics researcher with a background at Western University.

Below is what Grok gave me on the issue including the narrative negation of the likely truth of the matter:

What Happened

Nicholas Jordan Wagter (a biophysics researcher with a background at Western University) was involuntarily detained under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (specifically a Form 4 certificate). A psychiatrist named Dr. Taylor (Vancouver Coastal Health) observed him in a public café some time earlier.
She gathered additional information from his family members (referred to by him as the “Wagter-Browns”).
Based on that, she issued the certificate authorizing police to apprehend him for psychiatric assessment.
He was stopped in his car by the Car 87 mental health crisis response team (police + mental health workers) and taken to Vancouver General Hospital.

He has been posting videos from inside the hospital claiming:It’s unlawful / retaliatory.
He’s been “cleared by two other medical professionals” but is still being held.
It’s connected to his online research and political views.

Why Was He Committed?

The official reason (according to the process described in his own videos and collateral reports) is the standard criteria under BC’s Mental Health Act:He appeared to be suffering from a mental disorder.
He was deemed to be at risk of harm to himself or others (or unable to care for himself).

No public evidence has emerged that this was done solely for his political views. Family members appear to have been involved in providing collateral information, which is very common in these cases.

Context from His Own Content & Public ReactionWagter has been posting extensively about government corruption, Chinese influence in Canada, intelligence issues, etc.
Many of his followers are calling this “medical kidnapping” or political persecution.
A significant number of comments (including on Reddit and Instagram) suggest he may be in the middle of a manic episode or other mental health crisis. His family reportedly has a history of concern.

This is a developing situation — he is still posting from the hospital as of today.Main LinksHis main video announcing it: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYsnXzbyOwO/
“Proof I’m still in here”: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYup9RrzZIu/
His profile: @nicholas_jordan_wagter

The fact that CSIS itself has made a number of speeches, testimonies and interviews attempting to show Canadians the extent of Chinese influence in Canada doesn’t seem to be a mitigating factor here. In other words, he believed that China exercises undue influence. The fact is, anyone who doesn’t comes closer to a definition of crazy.

What’s missing is the order of events.

Reading this, it looks to me like what is at least equally likely is the following:

A psychiatrist who was aware of his social media postings, planted herself at a cafe she knew he would be at. She ‘observed’ him for a while, then went on to seek his family and get data that would add gravitas to her commitment of him. Next thing you know, well you will see the video of his arrest below and subsequent videos from inside the facility.

But even if I am wrong on this and it was a coincidence that the shrink was at the same cafe and she had already gotten reports from his family etc. etc. there is one pressing question that really matters and only one.

From where did the state get the power to do this to him?

It cannot be that they felt he was a danger to himself. The number one killer of Canadians now is the state itself with its increasingly lax criteria for administering MAiD.

A danger to others? Seems to me that if that was the case, every religious Muslim and ANTIFA member should be in the nuthouse and now.

Something really, really stinks about this. The fact that the arresting officer, yes its an arrest when they take you somewhere you don’t want to go and you have no choice. An arrest at best. A kidnapping is also a reasonable characterization given that there is ZERO DUE PROCESS.

I cannot embed the video but you can watch it here:

https://rumble.com/shorts/v7adu2y

From inside the facility:

https://rumble.com/shorts/v7aelaq

Now this may be pure coincidence. In that video he mentions that his was the only room with no drapes. As a consequence, he couldn’t sleep until he taped material over the windows because of the amount of light coming in to his room from them.

As it happens, I am at the part of the Gulag Archipelago where Solzhenitsyn is explaining the various tortures used to get people into a state of willingness to confess to whatever is shoved in front of them, Special emphasis is placed on forcing a lack of sleep. Solzhenitsyn even states that had medieval torturers been aware of the amazing properties of forcing sleep deprivation on people, they could have forgone all the messy and expensive torture devices so typical of the age.

Last data point, British Columbia is the most communist province of Canada. They ran a multi-year pilot decriminalizing pretty much all recreational drugs. Which worked out as one might expect.

But all this aside, every word of it. The only thing that matters is, how did the state take the power to do this to anyone?

Why are we not furious about it and demanding it be undone NO MATTER that justification, given the clearly dialectical way that these kinds of powers are deployed. Again, there is not an Imam in Canada that shouldn’t be locked up based on this criteria. Just thumb through a real translation of Koran, or peruse MEMRI’s site looking for sermons given in Canada.

Make Canada a Republic now.

A post script thought that may help take the point home, In the National Post article showing how a doctor had assessed a man outside a Tim Horton’s restaurant (For American readers, that is basically a McDonalds run by people from India, owned by Brazilians and named after a Canadian Hockey Player) decided he would be better off dead and drove him to his assassination site and killed him with drugs. For this set of actions, the same CPSO that destroyed medical careers of doctors who simply gave their best medical opinions that the mRNA vaxx was not always the best idea for their patients, told this doctor he could continue, but with 6 months supervision.

A London, Ont., doctor who assessed a patient with inflammatory bowel disease and a history of mental health issues for MAID outside a Tim Hortons location and later personally drove the man to the place his life was ended has agreed to a minimum six months’ supervision. […]

As part of an investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) into two public complaints made against MacLean, an independent assessor appointed to review a number of MacLean’s charts concluded that he “did not meet the standard of practice of the profession, displayed a lack of judgment and that his conduct exposes or is likely to expose patients to harm or injury in five out of twenty charts reviewed,” according to a summary decision of the college’s inquiries, complaints and reports committee.

MacLean was called before the committee to be verbally “cautioned” with respect to the MAID complaints.

In addition to agreeing to mandatory clinical supervision for at least six months as part of an “undertaking” with the college, MacLean will undergo ongoing review of his MAID patient charts and mandatory professional education related to MAID, consent, documentation, professional boundaries and professional behaviour.

Compare that to what happened to Dr. Mark Trozzi for just one, and a dozen other doctors I have interviewed, or know personally in Canada, like Dr. Mary O’Connor. They simply didn’t think the vaxx was a good idea and that no one had the right to force it on them. For those two opinions, one of which turned out to be medically true and the other is axiomatically correct, they were destroyed in terms of their medical careers and licences.

This is apples to apples. We are talking about the SAME CPSO, or College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

UPDATE: Someone prompted AI to write a song about this. its AI slop, bit hopefully it will get more attention on this issue.