Interview we did in 2022 with an embalmer on this issue:
RAIR article with John Campbell and John O’looney on the clots
Category Archives: Massive conspiracy
Game Changing peer review on Covid vaxx contamination may mean new court cases with better outcomes: Dr. David Speicher virologist/microbiologist at Pembroke, Rally in the Valley
You may need to sit down and relax a bit for this one. Dr. Speicher has a serious speech impediment. But the importance of his work, and the importance of what he has to say makes it very worth the time and patience required.
RAIR Foundation has an excellent synopsis of this talk by Dr. Speicher in Pembroke, just this past Sunday.
In essense, David announced that a pre-print that had been widely cited in various courts showing actual DNA contamination (maybe or maybe it was deliberately put there. Hard to believe something that high tech that does that exact damage was an accident) in the ‘vaccines’, had now been peer reviewed and scheduled for publication this week.
This slam dunks all previous objections to this scientific evidence on the basis that it had not been “peer reviewed”. A frankly ludicrous criteria anyway from the point of view of actual logic. What we used to call, argumentum ad verecundiam, or deference to authority but with no real basis in logic or evidence. Mind you I get that Peer review isn’t exactly like that. But since various medical journals admitted to publishing BS reports on Hydroxychloroquine (the lancet etc.) and since several US university professors managed to get several utterly ludicrous made up papers published in peer reviewed journals just because they sprinkled them with Marxist terminology, peer review should not be the criteria. But since it is, this is big news. Please watch and share.
A couple of related items. How they fit in here, is an unfinished jigsaw puzzle.
Breaking: Independent Doctors Praise HHS for Rescinding COVID Shots Emergency Use Authorization
IMA doctors celebrate HHS and FDA’s decision to revoke emergency use authorization for COVID-19 mRNA shots, calling it the first step in reckoning with the damage caused by forced mandates.
July 18 2025:
‘NO JAB, NO JOB’: Globe & Mail enforces vaccine mandate while touting equity
And now, paediatricians are suing the CDC over childhood vaccines. Related, but not directly concerning the mRNA shots
Film: Inside the Vaccine Trials
It is important that we never let this go. The fact that there has been zero accountability when there should be Nuremberg type Trials being held over what they did to us with these experimental gene therapy shots, means we should be doubly vigilant. Perhaps in some ways it’s our unending thirst for novelty that defeats us. We get bored with yesterday’s unresolved outrage and hunger for a newer one. But also because we are several attacks on the public past the Covid years; which was of course, the cover for the communist revolution across most of the Western world.
https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1944278060163117332
One thing that stands out to me as I watch this video, is a tiny sound byte from the Audio book, School of Darkness by Bella Dodd as she describes how the Communist infiltration and subversion of the United States went during her years as a communist subversive (1930-1949) She pointed out that the Communist Party which she refers to as, “The Communist International” or sometimes the NewSpeak term, “COMINTERN”, would deliberately pick incompetent people or people with no expertise in the relevant field to which they had been placed as leaders, as those people would take directions more readily from the COMINTERN.
When Covid first was made into an emergency in Canada, the Minister of Health was a woman with a BA in Graphic design from a nothing university and no experience in the health field whatsoever. Patty Hajdu, from Lakehead U.
This site speculated at the time and since, that Trudeau had picked Cabinet members based on their willingness to just do what he said as there would never be another job these people could ever get that would bestow upon them, that kind of money, power and prestige. All they had to do was do what they were told.
While going through School of Darkness, the only change I think I would make is that Trudeau was also one of the people picked for that reason. Carney on the other hand is more likely a person who synthesized the policies people like Trudeau and his cabinet would implement. One might speculate that this is the case based on Carney’s numerous quotes which had a distinctly authoritarian bent when discussing those who protested the state’s illegal Covid measures.
So Dodd in her book then reveals that institutions which existed for an ostensibly reasonable or even noble purpose, or were created with similar sounding goals, where in fact captured or created by the COMINTERN, and then retasked to implement communist policy and destroy ones which serve the interests of a republic, or what people typically call a “democracy”.
The fellow in the video below gets a lot right in his analysis. Maybe watch it for the segments of the RCMP spokeswoman and do your own analysis first, then see what you think of his approach. From our point of view, it belongs in this post, even if it means we have drifted a lot from the original video and purpose, the damage the vaxx did. But the greater damage we think is institutional. Because the only reason an experimental gene therapy was allowed out of the lab in the first place, let alone forced into billions of people, was the institutional damage done in part, by the processes we discuss here, and which will continue to rob us of things so precious to us, and so central to our identity and life experience, that in many cases, we don’t even realize we had them till they are taken from us. Like for example having your children sterilized by the state under the rubric of “Trans-affirming-Care”
The MSM andCanadian govt begins to release what we all knew about the vaxx 3 years ago
I guess the real story here is that CBS The National News Desk is reporting on something we all knew since 2021 now. But why now? If we knew it then, they knew it then. What should happen to them? I mean there is something really weird about this. Like how the British state revealed that the stabber of all the little girls in Southport indeed had materials and plans from The Islamic State but way way after lots of people got jailed for saying the obvious. We know that Truth can be hate speech. But somehow it feels like truth can also be disinformation when the state releases small parts of it way after the fact when people really can’t do anything about it.
Related: Dr. Mark Trozzi’s substack on new CANADIAN Data showing booster corelation with death.
They knew, they all knew: RCMP and White House releases on Covid origins and the vaxx
1. So more and more truth is coming out about Covid and the vaxx. At this point, people aren’t taking the mRNA shots anymore, so… not a help. Unless of course, it leads to accountability and the restoration of our individual rights to refuse anything even remotely like this in the future. Or more importantly, if people energize their gonads and take back their God given rights and do not permit anything like this to happen in the future. Which we almost certainly won’t do.
WhiteHouse.Gov on Covid origins
“The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally.
Please click through to the White House website for the rest of the reveal.
2. The RCMP 100% knew that the vaxx was killing large numbers of people. But had no issue with busting heads at the Freedom Convoy. A two Tweet Thread by retired Toronto police detective, Donald Best:
Screenshot
Screenshot
A few articles by Dr. Regina Wateel, author of Fisman’s Fraud
For those that don’t know her, Regina took on the herculean task of analyzing the Covid and Vaxx data from Ontario, and wrote a book exposing it as a total lie. This was not incompetence, or stupidity or error. But deliberate fabrication of, and distortion of actual data to force the various Covid measures which crippled Canada and much of the West for years.
She even titled her book, Fisman’s Fraud after the man who is mostly responsible in Ontario, David Fisman. Normally, a book titled So-and-so’s fraud and describing that fraud in the book would be grounds for a law suit. But interestingly, although Fisman himself has admitted awareness of the book, there is no sign of any legal action.
Here is a link to it in case anyone wants it, and I recommend getting it for several reasons.
1. It is a fantastic read. Although Dr. Wateel is a Ph.D in statistical analysis, the book reads like a mystery novel but contains all the court worthy evidence of the assertions within it.
2. Just showing a large number of sales of the book should put the fear of God into those who perpetrated this enormous and deadly fraud on Canada and beyond.
3. It makes a great gift to people just waking up to the reality of the West as it is now.
Regina also did an analysis of the recent Alberta study on Covid Measures.
ALBERTA’S DAMNING COVID-19 REPORT: What’s In it & What’s Missing
The recent report on Alberta’s COVID-19 pandemic response is a welcomed first step, hopefully of many, towards an open and honest dialogue about the COVID-19 debacle. While much of the information presented isn’t new to those who weren’t lobotomized by the relentless gaslighting, politicians and public health authorities have, until now, been able to keep such inconvenient facts from being officially recognized. This overdue recognition is, in itself, a very BIG deal.
The Alberta report is a damning indictment of the government’s pandemic response that needs to be leveraged to the fullest extent possible, but also reinforced.
The report made clear that it was the federal government who was in the driver’s seat when it came to the province’s pandemic response. Ultimately, decisions were based on federal and international recommendations as opposed to Alberta’s pre-existing pandemic response plan. However, the report doesn’t address WHY the Albertan government was so quick to hand over the keys and WHY they abandoned their own emergency plans. That question was outside the scope of the project.
The report did acknowledge that regulatory bodies essentially acted like mindless thugs, decrying any information that departed from the political narrative as misinformation and punishing any physician who refused to jeopardize their patients’ wellbeing by playing along.
Please click through for the rest:
There was also a major study done in Norway about all cause mortality by ‘vaccine’ status. This is Dr. Wateel’s analysis:
Salvaging the COVID-19 Vaccine Narrative
Many countries worldwide have experienced excess all-cause mortality (ACM) that coincides temporally with the COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns. In a seeming attempt to salvage the “safe and effective” narrative, several studies have emerged to counter the conjecture that the COVID-19 vaccines may increase mortality risk. A recent preprint out of Norway (Dahl et al., 2024) presents one such study.
The authors compare the all-cause mortality rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals aged 18 years or older living in Norway during January 1, 2021 through to December 31, 2023. The study used individual-level data where individuals were categorized as either unvaccinated (received no doses), partially vaccinated (received one or two doses) or fully vaccinated (received three or more doses) from the date of vaccination and onwards. Based on their analysis, the authors conclude that vaccinated individuals had a lower rate of all-cause death during 2021-2023 in Norway, even after accounting for sex, calendar time, county of residence and a high-risk health indicator. The authors cite several other supporting studies that have concluded there was no observed increase in all-cause mortality in vaccinated individuals.
While it may seem that these studies are evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduced mortality (or at the very least did not contribute to it), that is not the case. Contained within these papers is evidence (falsification tests) that betray such a conclusion. In the end, these studies serve to highlight the inherent limitations of observational studies and demonstrate their potential for misuse. This is particularly problematic for those seeking to show that the C19 vaccines are “safe and effective,” a claim that was not sufficiently established during the clinical trials.
Please click through to read how the Norwegians created their fraudulent result by misrepresenting the data, and how journalists stood in line to republish the fake conclusions.
“Hopefully, these doctors will have a change of heart, and take the time to read the Final Report and respond thoughtfully to all its findings and recommendations.”
Alberta’s medical establishment feels very threatened by the Final Report of the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force.
Commissioned by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, this 269-page report by eminent medical doctors and other distinguished scientists was released on January 24. The report is highly critical of the Alberta government’s lockdowns and vaccine passports as the response to COVID-19 and recommends different policies be used in future public health emergencies.
Three days after the Final Report was released, the Alberta Medical Association (AMA) issued a very short statement, just 64 words, denouncing the entire report as “biased, anti-science, anti-evidence, spreading misinformation,” and advancing “fringe approaches.” I have written about this in a previous column.
Two days after the AMA released its science-free rhetorical statement, 48 physicians and university professors endorsed an open letter to Smith and Alberta Health Minister Adriana LaGrange, calling on both to dismiss the Final Report in its entirety. The number of signatories has reportedly grown, since this open letter was released on January 29.
One might hope that this open letter from doctors and other scientists would refute and rebut the Final Report’s voluminous contents and its detailed review of the government’s response to COVID-19. One might expect that scientists would explain why each and every one of the Final Report’s numerous recommendations are deeply flawed. After all, these experts have publicly called on the premier and health minister to dismiss all of the findings, conclusions and recommendations in a 269-page report.
John Carpay spoke in Ottawa on the 13th about his court case, asking the courts to undo Trudeau’s politically motivated prorogation of Parliament, which he presented to the Federal court also on the 13th. We hope to be able to post that video soon.
Slovakia is making some real progress on vaxx crimes at the legislative level it appears
Gates of Vienna has this story on the legislator in the video below, Peter Kotlár, who is a Slovak physician and member of parliament.
He addresses the concept of involuntary vaxxing via contamination of the blood supply. Keep in mind, Canadians have died because they were denied clean blood by hospitals, even though they had compatible donors with them. All involved need to face Nuremberg style trials. Why would people be denied blood for a procedure from someone who was willing and able to give it?
Similarly from New Zealand. Look at the way the Daily Mail worded this story. The fact that hey had a willing donor for the baby is almost totally hidden in the text while adjectives making the parents seem crazy are sprinkled like Parmesan on pasta.
Followup: The baby died after transfusion.
Related, although they don’t mention transfusion as part of the issue
Shawn Buckley of Canada’s NCI discusses Trudeau bill C-69 on the future of health care in Canada
This is not good.
Shawn Buckley comes on at about 5 minutes in, for those who want to skip the sermon at the start.
Scientists react to leaked unredacted Robert Koch Inst. document showing what the German govt knew about Covid measures and when
The Robert Koch Institute is a highly prestigious German scientific institute equivalent to the CDC or FDA or Health Canada. Except they appear to have known the truth early on.
Please read the article at RAIR with the important details on the video below.
Australian TV show on vaxx damage, tool for soft selling the harm and absolving the guilty
The following video is very good.
Videos of people commenting on other videos have become a staple of YouTube etc. And most are garbage and click bait. But this gentleman does an excellent job of examining a recent Australian TV show that on the surface, is about getting truth and justice for the vaxx injured, but it reality appears to be more about soft selling the real damage. In a clip pasted below the main video, you will see how the TV show host agrees with the government propagandist and blame sink that the government ‘downplayed’ the harm the vaccines did.
The truth is that the government criminalized people that spoke out about their own personal vaccine horror stories. And if someone objects to my use of the word, criminalized, I mean they where ostracized by Cancel-Culture in the same way that the Romans would send enemies of the Emperor to a remote Island to live along for a period of time. The worse the crime, the smaller the island.
Police would brutalize people, including a young mother with a pram at the start of the communist reset we call Covid, for having a walk.
So when the TV host says “Downplayed” in agreement with state oppressor, it is as offensive as the things the host of this video point out. And what he points out is very good.
The video he used for the video above was from a Twitter account called @Crazynews4real
Looking through the clips on that account we found a few from this show:
Listening to Scott Morison, we might be reminded of a few changes Trudeau made that should have been enough for everyone to know not to touch this stuff, as it was clearly all a lie of one kind or another and to a purpose of one kind or another that had nothing to do with the public good.
Trudeau suddenly changed the expiry date. The Vaxx makers had made it extremely clear that these products had to be kept at a very low temperature requiring special freezers, and after a few hours at room temp and they would be useless. They also had a short shelf life even under these conditions.
Trudeau arbitrarily changed the expiry date, and mysteriously, with no changes of the formula of the vaxx itself, they no longer needed to be kept at whatever it was. -70C if memory serves, but very cold. Add that to the sudden changes in recommendations of who should get it and the picture draws itself.
From the same Twitter account, Crazy News 4 real:
Once upon a time when I was much younger and the past seemed much farther away, I wondered why Jewish people didn’t let the Holocaust go. How, I wondered, can we all move on if we keep beating this horse, be it dead or alive? The government response to the ‘Pandemic’ answered that question for me. We never let it go or it just happens again. Forgive? Always. Forget? Never.
In one of the videos from this TV show, I don’t have the time at the moment to rewatch them all, but the bit that made me want to do this post, is where the host of the show parrots in agreement, a statement by the stooge. And this was: ‘we downplayed the vaccine adverse effects’ or something very like it. But downplayed was the word. This is likely moving the sniper’s muzzle that needed millimetre away from the target. The government ‘downplayed’ the harm they did forcing a lethal lie on its entire population. Unless of course, like Canada and the USA, illegal migrants did not have to take the vaccine for some unstated reason. Then not the entire population. Just the law abiding ones.
Last video from Crazy News:
Full text:
???BREAKING: LEADING RESEARCH WEBSITE “LANCET” SET TO RE-RELEASE FINDINGS/RESEARCH FROM AUTOPSIES POST PFIZER/MODERNA VACCINATION!???
The study was initially pulled from their website siting “The conclusions not supported by study methodology”
The study has now gone through the peer review process and is rumored to conclude a very high percentage of sudden death cases are linked to the vaccines.
You can keep an eye on the study being published here??
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137Here is what Dr. Peter A. McCullough (A cardiologist following the harms) has to say about the findings??
If you see this, share this. I imagine it will be suppressed.
The Lancet as I recall, got caught taking money to publish a phoney paper condemning Hydroxychloroquine. Why that rag is still allowed to publish and not on trial for mass murder will be one of the great mysteries of the later half of this century, if we don’t sink entirely under a state based on narratives, destruction and lies.
Meanwhile, in the People’s Democratic Republic of Finland…
Finland to Start Bird Flu Vaccinations for Humans
From June 26 2024:
Finland plans to offer avian influenza vaccinations as soon as the week of June 30 to some workers with exposure to animals, health authorities said on June 25. That would make it the first country in the world to do so.
The Nordic country has bought vaccines for 10,000 people, each consisting of two injections, as part of a joint European procurement of up to 40 million doses for 15 nations from manufacturer CSL Seqirus.
“The vaccine will be offered to those aged 18 or over who are at increased risk of contracting avian influenza due to their work or other circumstances,” the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare said in a statement.
You have to read to the end to get to this:
In a strategy document released on June 25 aimed at a pandemic caused by influenza, U.S. officials said that vaccines “could be deployed before an outbreak begins and provide immune responses to a broad range of influenza viruses [and] could enable the population to have some level of protection against H5Nx viruses prior to a pandemic.”
Officials are backing the testing of multiple experimental vaccines against influenza, including two self-amplifying RNA vaccines targeting H5N1.
Pfizer and Moderna are also in talks with U.S. officials about messenger RNA vaccines against H5N1, after developing two widely used COVID-19 vaccines.
Although three farm workers in the United States have tested positive for H5N1 recently, officials have stressed that the illnesses are believed to have come from cows and that there are no signs as of yet of person-to-person transmission.
So I GUESS these vaccines are Vaxxes? It doesn’t seem to state explicitly that these shots the Finnish may be foolish enough to get are the same platform as the mRNA Covid ones. Either way, fasten your seatbelts and learn critical thinking skills and how to avoid critical theory attacks and propaganda attacks to navigate the next 6 months or so. Below, an example of both
New information on White House censorship of vaxx critics
“First amendment? First amendment! We don’t need no stinkin first amendment!!”
Before Alex Berenson’s post, maybe a look at some of the damage and suffering cause by the White House by censoring people’s ability to look at information critical of the damned mRNA/DNA vaccines.
https://twitter.com/vaxcasualty/status/1805359701758296430
Full text of the Tweet below in case he gets censored again. Please click through and retweet it if you have an account on TwitterX.
THE PFIZER/WHITE HOUSE FILES
In July 2021, a senior Pfizer board member secretly began working with a Biden Administration operative to suppress criticism of Covid vaccines on X, newly released internal documents from X show.
Top officials at Twitter (now X) viewed the men – Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer director, and Andy Slavitt, the operative, who had officially left a senior White House post just weeks before – as speaking for the administration in their censorship demands, the documents show.
The new documents raise constitutional and legal concerns about the Biden Administration’s social media censorship efforts, as well as Pfizer’s role in banning criticism of a product that made up almost half its sales in 2021.
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide Murthy v Missouri, a landmark lawsuit over the administration’s efforts to control debate on social media.
The new documents provide crucial perspective on the Missouri case, showing how far would-be censors went in 2021 to prop up public confidence in the Covid jabs. The documents also show the power the White House had over Twitter, which badly wanted to avoid a confrontation with it.
At the time, the Biden Administration was threatening to “review” a federal law commonly called Section 230, because it was angry social media companies were allowing Covid vaccine skepticism.
Section 230 was crucial to those companies for the near-total immunity it gave them against lawsuits from users. Twitter took threats to it seriously. “We will always be proactive and vigilant about protecting 230,” Lauren Culbertson, the company’s then-head of United States public policy, wrote on July 22, 2021.
—
None of these internal documents has been previously released.
They are part of a tranche of censorship-related material X is making available to me following searches of its internal archives.
Lawyers for X are reviewing the documents before releasing them. But so far only one document they have provided – an email from Jim Baker, Twitter’s then-deputy general counsel – contains any redactions.
In addition, no one at X, including Elon Musk, asked for or placed any restrictions on or had any input into the writing of this article. (Lawyers for X did ask to review it after writing but before publication, to be sure the names of junior employees or their email addresses were not included. Their review did not result in any changes.)
—
The censorship conspiracy by Slavitt and Gottlieb targeted me personally.
I am not named in any of the new documents provided so far. Slavitt and Gottlieb used careful – almost coded – language in their outreach to Twitter on July 18 and 19, 2021. They did initially not refer to any particular censorship targets by name. But emails and other internal Twitter documents that have already been released show I was a top target of both men.
I intend to use the newly released documents to amend Berenson v Biden, my complaint against Slavitt, Gottlieb, Pfizer chairman Dr. Albert Bourla, and the Biden Administration for conspiring to force Twitter to ban me in 2021. Gottlieb’s lawyers previously argued I had not alleged Gottlieb had had any contact with Twitter officials before August 2021. The documents show otherwise.
In fact, Slavitt introduced Gottlieb to Todd O’Boyle – a senior Twitter lobbyist who handled most of the company’s interactions with the White House – by email on Sunday, July 18, 2021. Slavitt, a longtime Democratic operative, had served as senior advisor to the Biden administration’s Covid response team.
“I wonder if you would be open to a 20 minute call with Scott Gottlieb and me about a policy matter,” Slavitt wrote. Slavitt referred to Gottlieb as “FDA commissioner under Trump” and failed to mention his role on Pfizer’s board.
Although he had officially left the Biden Administration weeks before, Slavitt’s email signature also contained his White House email address, asking that “Government Email” be sent there.
Slavitt’s outreach to O’Boyle came as the public debate over the Covid mRNA jabs was intensifying. The jabs, which had appeared very protective against Covid in the spring, were abruptly losing their effectiveness, causing the Biden Administration to consider encouraging Americans to receive a third “booster” shot.
The White House knew boosters – and potential vaccine mandates – would be controversial. As it tried to keep public confidence in the shots high, the administration escalated its attacks on Covid jab skeptics and on the social media platforms that gave them their biggest audiences.
Only two days before Slavitt’s email, on Friday, July 16, President Biden had said social media companies were “killing people” when they allowed vaccine skepticism. The firestorm that followed was mostly publicly directed at Facebook. But the new documents show that top officials at Twitter wanted to avoid similar criticism – or put Twitter’s Section 230 protection at risk.
On Monday, July 19, Gottlieb followed up by emailing O’Boyle directly, complaining about “false narratives on key public health issues” on Twitter.
Gottlieb told O’Boyle Twitter had an “affirmative obligation” to muzzle large accounts that made posts that concerned him. Gottlieb did not mention that he served on the board of a company that stood to make billions of dollars from the federal government if the Biden Administration rolled out booster shots and or jab mandates.
O’Boyle had already responded to Slavitt, offering to set up a conference call with the men that afternoon. “I’d be glad to speak with you and Scott,” he wrote Slavitt.
Note that O’Boyle’s response is time-stamped with a “UTC” code – he actually sent it at 9:22 a.m. Eastern time Monday morning, about 90 minutes before Gottlieb first emailed him.
O’Boyle also forwarded Gottlieb’s email to Culbertson, the head of Twitter’s United States public policy.
In turn, Culbertson sent it to even more senior officials with a comment indicating she viewed the email from Pfizer board member Gottlieb as directly related to the White House’s pressure campaign against vaccine skeptics. While the administration was angriest at Facebook, Twitter “could be next” and needed to “keep up the responsiveness,” she wrote.
Gottlieb increased the pressure on O’Boyle later in the week, after O’Boyle – apparently accidentally – failed to set up their promised conference call. Gottlieb, a regular panelist on Sunday morning political talk shows, wrote O’Boyle on Friday that he would be discussing the issue “on TV this weekend and wanted to just see if you still wanted to connect so I may have the benefit of your views.”
Within minutes, O’Boyle sent his “sincerest apologies” to the Pfizer board member and said he was “absolutely available.”
Within minutes, O’Boyle sent his “sincerest apologies” to the Pfizer board member and said he was “absolutely available.”
At the time, I was arguably the most prominent Covid vaccine skeptic on Twitter.
Slavitt had targeted my removal at least as early as April 2021, when he and Rob Flaherty, another White House official, met with Twitter and asked a “really tough question” about why the company had not suspended my account. I was also a sharp public critic of both Gottlieb and Slavitt.
But Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, supported me internally, and the company initially refused to ban me. By the summer, however, the Biden administration’s attitude towards vaccine skeptics had hardened. Meanwhile, Dorsey’s position at Twitter was increasingly tenuous; he would step down as chief executive in November.
Other Twitter officials did not appear to view the free speech rights of their users as a crucial issue in the same way as either Dorsey or Facebook’s top executives did.
In a note to other top Twitter lawyers and policy executives on July 19, Jim Baker, Twitter’s deputy general counsel, wrote only that “we have to be very thoughtful about how we interact with the government and what we say about it in communications with the USG [United States Government].”
Slavitt had targeted my removal at least as early as April 2021, when he and Rob Flaherty, another White House official, met with Twitter and asked a “really tough question” about why the company had not suspended my account. I was also a sharp public critic of both Gottlieb and Slavitt.
But Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, supported me internally, and the company initially refused to ban me. By the summer, however, the Biden administration’s attitude towards vaccine skeptics had hardened. Meanwhile, Dorsey’s position at Twitter was increasingly tenuous; he would step down as chief executive in November.
Other Twitter officials did not appear to view the free speech rights of their users as a crucial issue in the same way as either Dorsey or Facebook’s top executives did.
In a note to other top Twitter lawyers and policy executives on July 19, Jim Baker, Twitter’s deputy general counsel, wrote only that “we have to be very thoughtful about how we interact with the government and what we say about it in communications with the USG [United States Government].”
So the White House censorship campaign came at a time when Twitter’s users were more vulnerable than they had ever been.
And it succeeded. In a matter of months, it forced Twitter, which had once called itself “the free speech wing of the free speech party,” to become willing to ban anyone – including me – who questioned the efficacy or risks of the Covid jabs.
Note: as X releases more documents to me about Gottlieb, Slavitt, and the 2021 censorship campaign, I will write more articles.
Covid: The lies where from all ends
Many videos and comments have appeared in the past few days because of the 9th Circuit Court decision that the mRNA gene therapy devices are not actually a vaccine after all.
We all knew the mRNA shots were not vaccines. Those that paid attention at the start of all this knew that they actually had the definition of vaccine changed in the damned dictionary to accommodate this technology. A technology which is more of an autoimmune disease than a vaccine. That is to say, it is entirely a device to cause an autoimmune disease, and in no way is a vaccine. Just to be clearer on that.
This site has often attempted to demonstrate the numerous ways deceptions where used to create the pseudo-reality of a deadly plague which one could only be saved from, through the use of a device which causes an autoimmune disease.
The excellent book, Fisman’s Fraud is mandatory reading in terms of some of the key deceptions used in Canada, and also in the US and Great Britain with the use of delberately falsified modelling which lead to desired conclusions and not real ones. Although it is the opinion of this site that even if the numbers where true, that the plague was deadly and the vaccine worked perfectly, we as individuals had the right to refuse it and all the other measures in place period. It is when we gave up those most intrinsic rights that the revolution really took hold.
We have featured a video on this site made by a gentleman with a PhD in statistical analysis that demonstrates exactly how the Canadian government misrepresents real statistics to create an impression that is the exact opposite of the truth. Which is that the more injections you have, the worse the outcome and not the other way around.
One of our detractors on a number of issues often chastises me in private demanding “court Worthy evidence”. As if that was still a thing given how courts operate today. Follow any of the political trials to quickly put that thought to rest. But the video below is astonishing and never got the traction it should have. It is actual sworn testimony in a superior court in Rhode Island, where the chief officer of health explains that he would and did declare deaths from any cause to be from Covid if the had a + PCR test, even if they had been shot. in. the. head.
This means that even the deaths reported from Covid, which were not enough to actually show a blip in overall deaths for 2020 before the Vaxx, where likely, what is the term, Bullshit. That’s it.
Please dial the gear up to top quality for sharpest subtitles etc. as it can be difficult to hear.
The other night I had the privilege of attending a support group for some of the people who suffer powerful damage from the shots. I hope to be able to present an interview with one of them soon. She effectively has the symptoms of MS more or less from the Vaxx but does not have MS.
Paul Weston reminds us of critical facts over Covid and deaths which point right at the guilty and must not be washed away
So about Matt Hancock. Remember these things he did and said?
Some items on the mRNA vaxx and Covid measures that must not be forgotten or forgiven ever
1. This is at the moment a live broadcast of the Jason Levigne show with a guest who is/was a paramedic from Canada’s East Coast. He has a lot of very important things to say, among which, is how his employer as a paramedic actually took myocarditis and pericarditis off the list of things that allow one not to go to work, seemingly while denying that was a consequence of the shots they forced employees to take should they wish to remain employed. The show has a lot more interesting stories and reports of the nature of the consequences of the shots, and the consequences of refusing to take them in Canada.
2. The City of Ottawa is still trying to get people to get more injections of the mRNA
RAVE_COVID_spring_update_2024_04_04_ENG
Dear Colleagues, The Ministry of Health has advised Ottawa Public Health that the Ontario Spring COVID-19 vaccine campaign will run from April to June 2024. In alignment with the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommendations, the Ministry of Health is recommending that the following individuals who are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 receive an additional dose of an XBB COVID-19 vaccine in Spring 2024: • Adults 65 years of age and older; • Adult residents of long-term care homes and other congregate living settings for seniors; • Individuals 6 months of age and older who are moderately to severely immunocompromised (due to an underlying condition or treatment); and • Individuals 55 years and older who identify as First Nations, Inuit, or Metis and their nonIndigenous household members who are 55 years and older. An XBB COVID-19 vaccine in Spring 2024 is especially important for individuals at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 who did not receive a dose during the Fall 2023 program. Eligible individuals (as outlined above) are recommended to receive an XBB COVID19 vaccine if it has been 6 months from the previous COVID-19 vaccine dose or known SARSCoV-2 infection (whichever is later). A shorter interval (3 to <6 months) can be used if needed due to timing of protection for certain individuals. Vaccine Availability Participating pharmacies and participating healthcare providers will continue to provide COVID19 for the Spring campaign. Ottawa Public Health (OPH) will continue to offer the COVID-19 vaccine through local community clinics and neighbourhood health and wellness hubs. Visit the Provincial Vaccine Booking Centre to book an appointment with Ottawa Public Health. Ottawa Public Health offers free drop-in services to all residents of Ottawa at our accessible Neighbourhood Health and Wellness Hubs.
3. CDC Releases Hidden Trove Of COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Reports
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released previously hidden reports of facial paralysis and other adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination.
The 780,000 reports were received shortly after the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out, and show people experienced a wide range of post-vaccination problems, including heart inflammation, miscarriages, and seizures.
“Loss of consciousness and seizure immediately following injection. Went to ER by ambulance,” one person reported.
“Diagnosed with Bells Palsy today due to left-sided facial numbness and paralysis,” another said.
People lodged the reports with V-safe, a text-message system created by the CDC to monitor for possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
The CDC, for years, declined to make the V-safe data public, instead publishing studies that described the reports as providing reassurance about the safety of the shots. However, according to data released in 2022, nearly 8 percent of the 10 million users required medical attention or hospital care after vaccination, and many others reported missing school, work, or other normal activities.
That topline data came from check-the-box surveys.
The same judge who ordered the release of that data ordered the agency in January to disclose free-text entries from a different section where individuals could describe their experiences. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, appointed by former President Donald Trump, dismissed the government’s arguments that processing the responses and redacting sensitive information would require too much work.
The first two tranches, comprising 780,000 reports from some 523,000 people, include dozens of reports of heart inflammation, hundreds of reports of facial paralysis, and thousands of reports of tinnitus.
4. The following video is from one of the world’s top virologists who has been quite public and at the centre of the counter to the narrative vaxx movement, Geert Vanden Bossche. There are some truly unthinkable statements in this video, and at one level, there is no point in posting it as there is nothing anyone can do about it now. Either you took a lot of shots and these things may happen to you, or they won’t. There are apparently some forms of nutrient or plant therapy people who have had the vaxx can take which may mitigate some of the consequences of the shots. I don’t know and make no claims on this level. And I truly and sincerely hope Geert is wrong on this. The fallout from the shots have been horrifying already. Many people I know have suffered debilitating heart problems from the shots and mostly young and really healthy and athletic people have been damaged. What has happened already from the vaxx should be enough for a major purge of governments and institutions and aparatchicks in many many countries and districts. Watteel’s book, Fizman’s Fraud should have been enough to fill courtrooms across Canada and beyond. So no need for awful conjecture.
Unless he’s right. Then there is no percentage in not knowing. Any medical or scientific experts listening please offer your best analysis on what Vanden Bossche has to say here.
4. Mike Yeadon for those who don’t know, was a VIP of Pfizer, I think of product development. Like Geert, he has been front and centre warning people not to inject or accept this technology and has made some of the most dire predictions. If we were to go back over them, we might find some of the worst ones did not come to pass. But he’s right that criminal proceedings against a lot of politicians and companies need to be started.
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Introductory Statement About Serious Crimes To UK Police March 11, 2024
I don’t think it’s too great a claim to say that there isn’t anyone better qualified than I am to do this in relation to these novel treatments. I’m going to go directly to the charges. These injections have been carefully designed to intentionally cause toxicity in those injected with them. I can detect at least three, separate features of these injections which would be expected to injure, to kill or to reduce fertility in survivors. These are not mistakes. Each are so obviously deliberate to anyone who has a history of involvement in rational drug design for new medicines. -Dr. Yeadon
Click through for Yeadon’s open letter please.
5. Some GOOD NEWS!
Arbitrator rules Toronto hospital did not have grounds to terminate two employees who refused the COVID-19 vaccine. Arbitrator Jasbir Parmar has ruled that two hospital employees who were terminated by Humber River Hospital in Toronto for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine were wrongfully terminated. It was the employees union who stepped in to defend the two part-time clerical employees Stacy Hughes and Marisol Sanchez. Parmar outlined in her ruling that the hospital initially implemented a vaccine policy aligned with the provincial mandate, permitting unvaccinated hospital employees to undergo regular COVID testing. However, Humber River Hospital exceeded the provincial mandate by eliminating this option in December 2021. Instead, the hospital opted to permit only fully vaccinated individuals and those with documented medical exemptions to continue working. The hospital then established a deadline of January 17, 2022, for the submission of vaccination proof. However, neither of the two women complied, resulting in both being placed on a two-week unpaid leave starting January 20, 2022. Subsequently, the hospital issued a new deadline of February 3, 2022, for vaccination proof, but again, neither complied, leading to their immediate termination. Parmar said “While a result of the grievors’ exercise of their right not to be vaccinated meant they were not in compliance with the Hospital’s policy, the mere fact that the grievors were unwilling to have a vaccine injected into their bodies cannot fairly be characterized as an act of insubordination, or some other culpable conduct.” She concluded her ruling by saying, “I find the hospital did not have cause to terminate the grievers’ employment, either on a disciplinary basis or on non-culpable grounds.”
A family doctor is alerting its athlete patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine, saying they “may not be able to clear you to compete in sports without performing lab work and possibly an echocardiogram to rule out potential heart damage.”
Thank you all for checking out this site
Dr. David Martin: The Great Setup part 1
Each detail he mentions in the timeline, this site remembers well. This is recommended by Conservative Tree House.