Data points on Islamic and Leftist attacks on Western Civ, how to recognize them and how to get ahead of the tactics to see the strategy: Links 1 for August 14th, 2026

1. Muslims took a Viennese girl as a slave. This is the story, the justification and the reason it will get much much worse unless we the people decide to assert our own right to exist.

‘By Allah, I Will Kill You’: The Vienna Case and the Jihadist Model of Enslaving Non-Muslim Girls

2. Comedian, Ben Bankas gets a critical theory attack by the CBC.

Maybe the most important thing about this CBC critical theory attack on Bankas, Critical theory with more than a pinch of Discourse theory and mostly Habermas’ Repressive tolerance, is how they panned his act without seeing it.

In 1994, a book was released by a singularity brilliant and insightful man named Charles Murray, along with Richard J. Hernstein, the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology and who earlier served as chairman of Harvard’s Department of Psychology (1967–1971). I only heard of the book because it was reviewed everywhere in print, radio etc. The one thing all the reviews had in common was that the reviewers did not read it, and neither should anyone else.

I had never seen a review like that before. But it was intriguing. More than forbidden fruit, this heralded a new era in Canadian official culture where pressure was applied not to think or be exposed to certain thoughts. I can understand debating them, but this was new, and to me even back then, was an obscenity and a reason to hold Canada as a state in contempt.

So naturally I went out and got the book and read as much as I could of it. As much as I could because at a certain point, as the book itself predicted, it became too dense for my own ability to absorb the information. But from what I did read, it was extremely clear that the book was the opposite of what all the reviews claimed it was and why we shouldn’t read it. Yes, the book defied a critical and fundamental state narrative, but not the one or the way they said it did. Which has now become the norm for Canada. And Ben Bankas has become big enough and authoritative enough to get the same treatment as Charles Murray.

At this point for him to tour Canada is a genuine act of bravery and defiance. But then again, as Ezra reminds us, he did that all during Covid doing comedy shows in the park in Toronto while the fun police tried to shut him down.

Another women who didn

t go see him talked about Bankas as always punching down instead for up. As Ezra says, she means not making fun of Trump. But the reason the crowd likes Bankas so much in the clips she may be referring to, if she’s even seen them, are the jokes Bankas makes about those who actually DO have an unfair amount of power compared to everyone else because of a socialist government. And it’s the exact groups she names. Women, those allegedly born in the wrong bodies, (trans) Amer-Indians. The people who the law protects at the expense of the most fundamental rights like freedom of speech. That parents under C4 can be flipping jailed for trying to talk their own pre pubescent children out of being spayed or neutered! That IS punching up. What this woman means of course, is not engaging in the Orwellian 2 minutes of hate against Trump.

Another point to add to Ezra’s accurate observation about a joke about ‘Bad Bunny’. Had Bad Bunny been anyone, not even nearly as successful as he actually is, who had the same act but was counter-narrative then he would be attacked by the exact same CBC consensus-comedians for exploiting women etc. etc. In other words, all attacks on movies, comedians and entertainers in general are teleological in nature. In other words, the content is good or bad based on its effects to the state and state narratives. And that is the summary for the reviews on The Bell Curve, Ben Bankas and so on. It’s actually very simple and impossible to unsee once you get it. The one critic who talks about George Carlin proves both Ezra’a and my points. No one really laughs at carlin, they clap at his witty attacks on conservative (for the most part) people and principles.

One comment on YouTube under this video says it all:
@lsdave

5 months ago

The fact the CBC doesn’t allow commenting on any of their online videos is telling.

As they say, the best revenge is living well, and Bankas appears to be doing so.

If the Bell Curve is still available, I strongly recommend getting it, reading it, and hiding it somewhere in your walls very well. Fahrenheit 451 is not that far away in the Anglosphere. And maybe someday I will do my own review if I remember enough of it to justify doing it.

3. This is the reason that DEI was implemented. To create this. Never forget that.

4. Dr. Trozzi asks what is really a rhetorical question.

5. Here is a link to an Alex Berenson article which contains a letter to him from a college Prof. who responded to another article of Berenson’s about the youngest ever Ivy League prof. who made up his resume in an obvious way and DEI principles, if that is what you can call them, placed him in a rapid incline to authority for the opposite of reasons. We published a video about him some days ago when it briefly hit the news cycle. The article and letter are good of course. But this is important for all who think that under Trump the US is immune to all these Lines of Effort to destroy the country in every possible way by leftist policies like DEI.

6. This is too good and too important to wait for a new post.

This video showing how the study that shows that children raised by same sex couples have 4X the rate of emotional problems got buried, shows a singular methodology used by the Left to warp reality overall to achieve the predetermined outcome the narrative demands.

We may remember during Covid how everything got redefined in order to allow for outcomes the state wanted. One of the moments where my views on the mRNA experimental gene therapy shots moved to a state of crimson alert was when they redefined the word, vaccine, to accommodate something which meant none of its usual defining attributes in order to legally maneuver it as a vaccine. Watch this video with that in mind. Again, like much this site attempts. the idea is not to bring a single issue to your attention, but a methodology being used to control you and remove components of who you are overall. The methods are far more important than the individual targets. You can spend your life doing damage control for each Line of Action, like Gay Marriage (As a quasi-libertarian I believe people should be able to live however they want. But gay Marriage was an attack on marriage. Had it been about homosexual rights, a Civil Union would have solved those issues without being a clear and obvious dialectic on marriage itself) or Global arming etc. the real need is to understand the method so you can actually get ahead of it and recognize an attack when you see it coming rather than in the rearview and then head back and try and put out the fires.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Related: Here is the same woman doing a proper look at the real outcomes of Gay Marriage. Again, important in terms of understanding reality Vs. Narrative, but not dealing with the purpose of Gay Marriage as a dialectic attack on marriage as a whole.

For those who doubt this premise about the real purpose of Gay Marriage being an attack on Marriage itself, this talk by a notable Lesbian activist below should help settle it.

This is notable leftist activist, Masha Gessen.